CAP-MAP: cap analysis protocol with minimal analyte processing, a rapid and sensitive approach to analysing mRNA cap structures

CK2 phosphorylation of CMTR1 promotes RNA cap formation and influenza virus infection

The RNA cap methyltransferase CMTR1 methylates the first transcribed nucleotide of RNA polymerase II transcripts, impacting gene expression mechanisms, including during innate immune responses. Using mass spectrometry, we identify a multiply phosphorylated region of CMTR1 (phospho-patch [P-Patch]), which is a substrate for the kinase CK2 (casein kinase II). CMTR1 phosphorylation alters intramolecular interactions, increases recruitment to RNA polymerase II, and promotes RNA cap methylation. P-Patch phosphorylation occurs during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, recruiting CMTR1 to RNA polymerase II during a period of rapid transcription and RNA cap formation. CMTR1 phosphorylation is required for the expression of specific RNAs, including ribosomal protein gene transcripts, and promotes cell proliferation. CMTR1 phosphorylation is also required for interferon-stimulated gene expression. The cap-snatching virus, influenza A, utilizes host CMTR1 phosphorylation to produce the caps required for virus production and infection. We present an RNA cap methylation control mechanism whereby CK2 controls CMTR1, enhancing co-transcriptional capping.

Trinucleotide mRNA Cap Analogue N6-Benzylated at the Site of Posttranscriptional m6Am Mark Facilitates mRNA Purification and Confers Superior Translational Properties In Vitro and In Vivo

Eukaryotic mRNAs undergo cotranscriptional 5'-end modification with a 7-methylguanosine cap. In higher eukaryotes, the cap carries additional methylations, such as m6Am─a common epitranscriptomic mark unique to the mRNA 5'-end. This modification is regulated by the Pcif1 methyltransferase and the FTO demethylase, but its biological function is still unknown. Here, we designed and synthesized a trinucleotide FTO-resistant N6-benzyl analogue of the m6Am-cap-m7GpppBn6AmpG (termed AvantCap) and incorporated it into mRNA using T7 polymerase. mRNAs carrying Bn6Am showed several advantages over typical capped transcripts. The Bn6Am moiety was shown to act as a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) purification handle, allowing the separation of capped and uncapped RNA species, and to produce transcripts with lower dsRNA content than reference caps. In some cultured cells, Bn6Am mRNAs provided higher protein yields than mRNAs carrying Am or m6Am, although the effect was cell-line-dependent. m7GpppBn6AmpG-capped mRNAs encoding reporter proteins administered intravenously to mice provided up to 6-fold higher protein outputs than reference mRNAs, while mRNAs encoding tumor antigens showed superior activity in therapeutic settings as anticancer vaccines. The biochemical characterization suggests several phenomena potentially underlying the biological properties of AvantCap: (i) reduced propensity for unspecific interactions, (ii) involvement in alternative translation initiation, and (iii) subtle differences in mRNA impurity profiles or a combination of these effects. AvantCapped-mRNAs bearing the Bn6Am may pave the way for more potent mRNA-based vaccines and therapeutics and serve as molecular tools to unravel the role of m6Am in mRNA.

The molecular language of RNA 5' ends: guardians of RNA identity and immunity

RNA caps are deposited at the 5' end of RNA polymerase II transcripts. This modification regulates several steps of gene expression, in addition to marking transcripts as self to enable the innate immune system to distinguish them from uncapped foreign RNAs, including those derived from viruses. Specialized immune sensors, such as RIG-I and IFITs, trigger antiviral responses upon recognition of uncapped cytoplasmic transcripts. Interestingly, uncapped transcripts can also be produced by mammalian hosts. For instance, 5'-triphosphate RNAs are generated by RNA polymerase III transcription, including tRNAs, Alu RNAs, or vault RNAs. These RNAs have emerged as key players of innate immunity, as they can be recognized by the antiviral sensors. Mechanisms that regulate the presence of 5'-triphosphates, such as 5'-end dephosphorylation or RNA editing, prevent immune recognition of endogenous RNAs and excessive inflammation. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the complexity of RNA cap structures and 5'-triphosphate RNAs, highlighting their roles in transcript identity, immune surveillance, and disease.

PCR-based analytics of gene therapies using adeno-associated virus vectors: Considerations for cGMP method development

The field of gene therapy has evolved and improved so that today the treatment of thousands of genetic diseases is now possible. An integral aspect of the drug development process is generating analytical methods to be used throughout clinical and commercial manufacturing. Enumeration and identification assays using genetic testing are critical to ensure the safety, efficacy, and stability of many active pharmaceutical ingredients. While nucleic acid-based methods are already reliable and rapid, there are unique biological, technological, and regulatory aspects in gene therapies that must be considered. This review surveys aspects of method development and validation using nucleic acid-based testing of gene therapies by focusing on adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors and their co-transfection factors. Key differences between quantitative PCR and droplet digital technologies are discussed to show how improvements can be made while still adhering to regulatory guidance. Example validation parameters for AAV genome titers are described to demonstrate the scope of analytical development. Finally, several areas for improving analytical testing are presented to inspire future innovation, including next-generation sequencing and artificial intelligence. Reviewing the broad characteristics of gene therapy assessment serves as an introduction for new researchers, while clarifying processes for professionals already involved in pharmaceutical manufacturing.

RAM is upregulated during T cell activation and is required for RNA cap formation and gene expression

On T cell activation, upregulation of gene expression produces the protein required for the differentiation and proliferation of effector cell populations. RAM (RNMT-Activating Mini protein/RAMAC/Fam103a1), the cofactor of the RNA cap methyltransferase RNMT (RNA guanosine N-7 cap methyltransferase), is upregulated following activation. Formation of the RNA cap protects RNA during synthesis and guides RNA processing and translation. Using conditional gene deletion, we found that Ram expression stabilizes RNMT protein in T cells and is required for its upregulation on activation. When the Ram gene is deleted in naïve T cells, there are major impacts on activation-induced RNA cap formation and gene expression. Activated T cell proliferation is dependent on increased ribosome production; in Ram knockout T cells, activation-induced expression of ribosomal protein genes and snoRNAs is most severely reduced. Consistent with these changes, Ram deletion resulted in reduced protein synthesis, and reduced growth and proliferation of CD4 T cells. Deletion of Ram results in a similar but milder phenotype to Rnmt deletion, supporting the role of RAM as a RNMT cofactor.

A systems-level mass spectrometry-based technique for accurate and sensitive quantification of the RNA cap epitranscriptome

Chemical modifications of transcripts with a 5' cap occur in all organisms and function in many aspects of RNA metabolism. To facilitate analysis of RNA caps, we developed a systems-level mass spectrometry-based technique, CapQuant, for accurate and sensitive quantification of the cap epitranscriptome. The protocol includes the addition of stable isotope-labeled cap nucleotides (CNs) to RNA, enzymatic hydrolysis of endogenous RNA to release CNs, and off-line enrichment of CNs by ion-pairing high-pressure liquid chromatography, followed by a 17 min chromatography-coupled tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry run for the identification and quantification of individual CNs. The total time required for the protocol can be up to 7 d. In this approach, 26 CNs can be quantified in eukaryotic poly(A)-tailed RNA, bacterial total RNA and viral RNA. This protocol can be modified to analyze other types of RNA and RNA from in vitro sources. CapQuant stands out from other methods in terms of superior specificity, sensitivity and accuracy, and it is not limited to individual caps nor does it require radiolabeling. Thanks to its unique capability of accurately and sensitively quantifying RNA caps on a systems level, CapQuant can reveal both the RNA cap landscape and the transcription start site distribution of capped RNA in a broad range of settings.

Contribution of Nudt12 enzyme to differentially methylated dinucleotides of 5'RNA cap structure

Recent findings have substantially broadened our knowledge about the diversity of modifications of the 5'end of RNAs, an issue generally attributed to mRNA cap structure (m⁷GpppN). Nudt12 is one of the recently described new enzymatic activities involved in cap metabolism. However, in contrast to its roles in metabolite-cap turnover (e.g., NAD-cap) and NADH/NAD metabolite hydrolysis, little is known regarding its hydrolytic activity towards dinucleotide cap structures. In order to gain further insight into this Nudt12 activity, comprehensive analysis with a spectrum of cap-like dinucleotides was performed with respect to different nucleotide types adjacent to the (m⁷)G moiety and its methylation status. Among the tested compounds, GpppA, GpppA_m, and Gpppm⁶A_m were identified as novel potent Nudt12 substrates, with K_M values in the same range as that of NADH. Interestingly, substrate inhibition of Nudt12 catalytic activity was detected in the case of the GpppG dinucleotide, a phenomenon not reported to date. Finally, comparison of Nudt12 with DcpS and Nud16, two other enzymes with known activity on dinucleotide cap structures, revealed their overlapping and more specific substrates. Altogether, these findings provide a basis for clarifying the role of Nudt12 in cap-like dinucleotide turnover.

Cap analogs with a hydrophobic photocleavable tag enable facile purification of fully capped mRNA with various cap structures

Starting with the clinical application of two vaccines in 2020, mRNA therapeutics are currently being investigated for a variety of applications. Removing immunogenic uncapped mRNA from transcribed mRNA is critical in mRNA research and clinical applications. Commonly used capping methods provide maximum capping efficiency of around 80-90% for widely used Cap-0- and Cap-1-type mRNAs. However, uncapped and capped mRNA possesses almost identical physicochemical properties, posing challenges to their physical separation. In this work, we develop hydrophobic photocaged tag-modified cap analogs, which separate capped mRNA from uncapped mRNA by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Subsequent photo-irradiation recovers footprint-free native capped mRNA. This approach provides 100% capping efficiency even in Cap-2-type mRNA with versatility applicable to 650 nt and 4,247 nt mRNA. We find that the Cap-2-type mRNA shows up to 3- to 4-fold higher translation activity in cultured cells and animals than the Cap-1-type mRNA prepared by the standard capping method.

The RNA cap methyltransferases RNMT and CMTR1 co-ordinate gene expression during neural differentiation

Regulation of RNA cap formation has potent impacts on gene regulation, controlling which transcripts are expressed, processed and translated into protein. Recently, the RNA cap methyltransferases RNA guanine-7 methyltransferase (RNMT) and cap-specific mRNA (nucleoside-2'-O-)-methyltransferase 1 (CMTR1) have been found to be independently regulated during embryonic stem (ES) cell differentiation controlling the expression of overlapping and distinct protein families. During neural differentiation, RNMT is repressed and CMTR1 is up-regulated. RNMT promotes expression of the pluripotency-associated gene products; repression of the RNMT complex (RNMT-RAM) is required for repression of these RNAs and proteins during differentiation. The predominant RNA targets of CMTR1 encode the histones and ribosomal proteins (RPs). CMTR1 up-regulation is required to maintain the expression of histones and RPs during differentiation and to maintain DNA replication, RNA translation and cell proliferation. Thus the co-ordinate regulation of RNMT and CMTR1 is required for different aspects of ES cell differentiation. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms by which RNMT and CMTR1 are independently regulated during ES cell differentiation and explore how this influences the co-ordinated gene regulation required of emerging cell lineages.

The cap epitranscriptome: Early directions to a complex life as mRNA

Animal, protist and viral messenger RNAs (mRNAs) are most prominently modified at the beginning by methylation of cap-adjacent nucleotides at the 2'-O-position of the ribose (cOMe) by dedicated cap methyltransferases (CMTrs). If the first nucleotide of an mRNA is an adenosine, PCIF1 can methylate at the N⁶ -position (m⁶ A), while internally the Mettl3/14 writer complex can methylate. These modifications are introduced co-transcriptionally to affect many aspects of gene expression including localisation to synapses and local translation. Of particular interest, transcription start sites of many genes are heterogeneous leading to sequence diversity at the beginning of mRNAs, which together with cOMe and m⁶ Am could constitute an extensive novel layer of gene expression control. Given the role of cOMe and m⁶ A in local gene expression at synapses and higher brain functions including learning and memory, such code could be implemented at the transcriptional level for lasting memories through local gene expression at synapses.

RNA m6A methylation across the transcriptome

Since the early days of foundational studies of nucleic acids, many chemical moieties have been discovered to decorate RNA and DNA in diverse organisms. In mammalian cells, one of these chemical modifications, N6-methyl adenosine (m6A), is unique in a way that it is highly abundant not only on RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcribed, protein-coding transcripts but also on non-coding RNAs, such as ribosomal RNAs and snRNAs, mediated by distinct, evolutionarily conserved enzymes. Here, we review RNA m6A modification in the light of the recent appreciation of nuclear roles for m6A in regulating chromatin states and gene expression, as well as the recent discoveries of the evolutionarily conserved methyltransferases, which catalyze methylation of adenosine on diverse sets of RNAs. Considering that the substrates of these enzymes are involved in many important biological processes, this modification warrants further research to understand the molecular mechanisms and functions of m6A in health and disease.

CAPturAM, a Chemo-Enzymatic Strategy for Selective Enrichment and Detection of Physiological CAPAM-Targets

Modified nucleotides impact all aspects of eukaryotic mRNAs and contribute to regulation of gene expression at the transcriptional and translational level. At the 5' cap, adenosine as first transcribed nucleotide is often N⁶ -methyl-2'-O-methyl adenosine (m⁶ A_m ). This modification is tissue dependent and reversible, pointing to a regulatory function. CAPAM was recently identified as methyltransferase responsible for m⁶ A_m formation, however, the direct assignment of its target transcripts proves difficult. Antibodies do not discriminate between internal N⁶ -methyl adenosine (m⁶ A) and m⁶ A_m . Here we present CAPturAM, an antibody-free chemical biology approach for direct enrichment and probing of physiological CAPAM-targets. We harness CAPAM's cosubstrate promiscuity to install propargyl groups on its targets. Subsequent functionalization with an affinity handle allows for their enrichment. Using wildtype and CAPAM^-/- cells, we successfully applied CAPturAM to confirm or disprove CAPAM-targets, facilitating the verification and identification of CAPAM targets.

CMTr mediated 2'-O-ribose methylation status of cap-adjacent nucleotides across animals

Cap methyltransferases (CMTrs) O methylate the 2' position of the ribose (cOMe) of cap-adjacent nucleotides of animal, protist, and viral mRNAs. Animals generally have two CMTrs, whereas trypanosomes have three, and many viruses encode one in their genome. In the splice leader of mRNAs in trypanosomes, the first four nucleotides contain cOMe, but little is known about the status of cOMe in animals. Here, we show that cOMe is prominently present on the first two cap-adjacent nucleotides with species- and tissue-specific variations in Caenorhabditis elegans, honeybees, zebrafish, mouse, and human cell lines. In contrast, Drosophila contains cOMe primarily on the first cap-adjacent nucleotide. De novo RoseTTA modeling of CMTrs reveals close similarities of the overall structure and near identity for the catalytic tetrad, and for cap and cofactor binding for human, Drosophila and C. elegans CMTrs. Although viral CMTrs maintain the overall structure and catalytic tetrad, they have diverged in cap and cofactor binding. Consistent with the structural similarity, both CMTrs from Drosophila and humans methylate the first cap-adjacent nucleotide of an AGU consensus start. Because the second nucleotide is also methylated upon heat stress in Drosophila, these findings argue for regulated cOMe important for gene expression regulation.

Novel Mobile Phase to Control Charge States and Metal Adducts in the LC/MS for mRNA Characterization Assays

Mass spectrometry is a widely used tool in the characterization of oligonucleotides. This analysis can be challenging due to the large number of possible charge states of oligonucleotides, which can limit the sensitivity of the assay, along with the propensity of oligonucleotides to readily form adducts with free alkali metals. To reduce the adduct formation, oligonucleotides are typically purified with desalting columns prior to analysis. We have developed a mobile phase that gives superior reduction in charge states and adduct formation compared to previously reported methods and, more importantly, obviates the requirement of desalting samples prior to mass spectrometric analysis, significantly decreasing the sample preparation time and amount of RNA required for analysis. We have applied this mobile phase to develop methods to quantify the 5'-capping efficiency and to characterize the polyadenosine (poly(A)) tail of mRNA synthesized in vitro: two critical quality attributes of mRNA therapeutics. Through this, we were able to demonstrate RNA that was co-transcriptionally capped to have capping efficiency equivalent (the percent total molecules that contain a cap) to other reports in the literature using materials that were generated using the same synthesis procedure. Furthermore, by using a mobile phase mixture comprised of hexafluoroisopropanol, triethylammonium acetate, triethylamine, and ethanol, we were able to determine the size distribution of the poly(A) tail in various mRNA samples from DNA templates that ranged from 50 to 150 nt poly(A) and verify that distribution with commercially available RNA standards, successfully demonstrating that this mobile phase composition could be used for characterization assays for both mRNA caps and tails.

Chemo-Enzymatic Modification of the 5' Cap To Study mRNAs

The central dogma of molecular biology hinges on messenger RNA (mRNA), which presents a blueprint of the genetic information encoded in the DNA and serves as a template for translation into proteins. In addition to its fundamental importance in basic research, this class of biomolecules has recently become the first approved Covid vaccine, underscoring its utility in medical applications.Eukaryotic mRNA is heavily processed, including the 5' cap as the primary hallmark. This 5' cap protects mRNA from degradation by exoribonucleases but also interacts specifically with several proteins and enzymes to ensure mRNA turnover and processing, like splicing, export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and initiation of translation. The absence of a 5' cap leads to a strong immune response, and the methylation status contributes to distinguishing self from non-self RNA.Non-natural modifications of the 5' cap provide an avenue to label mRNAs and make them accessible to analyses, which is important to study their cellular localization, trafficking, and binding partners. They bear potential to engineer mRNAs, e.g., more stable or immunogenic mRNAs that are still translated, by impacting select interactions in a distinct manner. The modification of the 5' cap itself is powerful as it can be applied to make long mRNAs (∼1000 nt, not directly accessible by solid-phase synthesis) by in vitro transcription.This Account describes our contribution to the field of chemo-enzymatic modification of mRNA at the 5' cap. Our approach relies on RNA methyltransferases (MTases) with promiscuous activity on analogues of their natural cosubstrate S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet). We will describe how RNA MTases in combination with non-natural cosubstrates provide access to site-specific modification of different positions of the 5' cap, namely, the N² and N7 position of guanosine and the N⁶ position of adenosine as the transcription start nucleotide (TSN) and exemplify strategies to make long mRNAs with modified 5' caps.We will compare the chemical and enzymatic synthesis of the AdoMet analogues used for this purpose. We could overcome previous limitations in methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT) substrate scope by engineering variants (termed PC-MATs) with the ability to convert methionine analogues with benzylic and photocaging groups at the sulfonium ion.The final part of this Account will highlight applications of the modified mRNAs. Like in many chemo-enzymatic approaches, a versatile strategy is to install small functional groups enzymatically and use them as handles in subsequent bioorthogonal reactions. We showed fluorescent labeling of mRNAs via different types of click chemistry in vitro and in cells. In a second line of applications, we used the handles to make mRNAs amenable for analyses, most notably next-generation sequencing. In the case of extremely promiscuous enzymes, the direct installation of photo-cross-linking groups was successful also and provided a way to covalently bind protein-interaction partners. Finally, the non-natural modifications of mRNAs can also modulate the properties of mRNAs. Propargylation of A_m as the transcription start nucleotide at its N⁶ position maintained the translation of mRNAs but increased their immunogenicity. The installation of photocaging groups provides a way to revert these effects and control interactions by light.

CMTr cap-adjacent 2'-O-ribose mRNA methyltransferases are required for reward learning and mRNA localization to synapses

Cap-adjacent nucleotides of animal, protist and viral mRNAs can be O-methylated at the 2‘ position of the ribose (cOMe). The functions of cOMe in animals, however, remain largely unknown. Here we show that the two cap methyltransferases (CMTr1 and CMTr2) of Drosophila can methylate the ribose of the first nucleotide in mRNA. Double-mutant flies lack cOMe but are viable. Consistent with prominent neuronal expression, they have a reward learning defect that can be rescued by conditional expression in mushroom body neurons before training. Among CMTr targets are cell adhesion and signaling molecules. Many are relevant for learning, and are also targets of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP). Like FMRP, cOMe is required for localization of untranslated mRNAs to synapses and enhances binding of the cap binding complex in the nucleus. Hence, our study reveals a mechanism to co-transcriptionally prime mRNAs by cOMe for localized protein synthesis at synapses.

The two cap methyltransferases (CMTrs) redundantly methylate riboses of first cap adjacent nucleotides in messenger RNAs in Drosophila. Here, CMTrs are required for reward learning and localization of untranslated messenger RNAs to synapses.

The epitranscriptome toolbox

In the last decade, the notion that mRNA modifications are involved in regulation of gene expression was demonstrated in thousands of studies. To date, new technologies and methods allow accurate identification, transcriptome-wide mapping, and functional characterization of a growing number of RNA modifications, providing important insights into the biology of these marks. Most of the methods and approaches were developed for studying m⁶A, the most prevalent internal mRNA modification. However, unique properties of other RNA modifications stimulated the development of additional approaches. In this technical primer, we will discuss the available tools and approaches for detecting and studying different RNA modifications.

OUP accepted manuscript

CMTR1 (cap methyltransferase 1) catalyses methylation of the first transcribed nucleotide of RNAPII transcripts (N1 2′-O-Me), creating part of the mammalian RNA cap structure. In addition to marking RNA as self, N1 2′-O-Me has ill-defined roles in RNA expression and translation. Here, we investigated the gene specificity of CMTR1 and its impact on RNA expression in embryonic stem cells. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, CMTR1 was found to bind to transcription start sites (TSS) correlating with RNAPII levels, predominantly binding at histone genes and ribosomal protein (RP) genes. Repression of CMTR1 expression resulted in repression of RNAPII binding at the TSS and repression of RNA expression, particularly of histone and RP genes. In correlation with regulation of histones and RP genes, CMTR1 repression resulted in repression of translation and induction of DNA replication stress and damage. Indicating a direct role for CMTR1 in transcription, addition of recombinant CMTR1 to purified nuclei increased transcription of the histone and RP genes. CMTR1 was found to be upregulated during neural differentiation and there was an enhanced requirement for CMTR1 for gene expression and proliferation during this process. We highlight the distinct roles of the cap methyltransferases RNMT and CMTR1 in target gene expression and differentiation.

RNA Binding Proteins as Pioneer Determinants of Infection: Protective, Proviral, or Both?

As the first intracellular host factors that directly interact with the genomes of RNA viruses, RNA binding proteins (RBPs) have a profound impact on the outcome of an infection. Recent discoveries brought about by new methodologies have led to an unprecedented ability to peer into the earliest events between viral RNA and the RBPs that act upon them. These discoveries have sparked a re-evaluation of current paradigms surrounding RBPs and post-transcriptional gene regulation. Here, we highlight questions that have bloomed from the implementation of these novel approaches. Canonical RBPs can impact the fates of both cellular and viral RNA during infection, sometimes in conflicting ways. Noncanonical RBPs, some of which were first characterized via interactions with viral RNA, may encompass physiological roles beyond viral pathogenesis. We discuss how these RBPs might discriminate between an RNA of either cellular or viral origin and thus exert either pro- or antiviral effects—which is a particular challenge as viruses contain mechanisms to mimic molecular features of cellular RNA.

Combined exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and high-fat diet modifies the global epitranscriptomic landscape in mouse liver

Exposure to a single dose of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and a 12-week high-fat diet (HFD) results in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in mice by altering intracellular signaling and inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Post-transcriptional chemical modification (PTM) of RNA regulates biological processes, but the contribution of epitranscriptomics to PCB-induced steatosis remains unknown. This study tested the hypothesis that PCB and HFD exposure alters the global RNA epitranscriptome in male mouse liver. C57BL/6J male mice were fed a HFD for 12 weeks and exposed to a single dose of Aroclor 1260 (20 mg/kg), PCB 126 (20 µg/kg), both Aroclor 1260 and PCB 126 or vehicle control after 2 weeks on HFD. Chemical RNA modifications were identified at the nucleoside level by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. From 22 PTM global RNA modifications, we identified 10 significant changes in RNA modifications in liver with HFD and PCB 126 exposure. Only two modifications were significantly different from HFD control liver in all three PCB exposure groups: 2'-O-methyladenosine (Am) and N(6)-methyladenosine (m6A). Exposure to HFD + PCB 126 + Aroclor 1260 increased the abundance of N(6), O(2)-dimethyladenosine (m6Am), which is associated with the largest number of transcript changes. Increased m6Am and pseudouridine were associated with increased protein expression of the writers of these modifications: Phosphorylated CTD Interacting Factor 1 (PCIF1) and Pseudouridine Synthase 10 (PUS10), respectively, in HFD + PCB 126- + Aroclor 1260-exposed mouse liver. Increased N1-methyladenosine (m1A) and m6A were associated with increased transcript levels of the readers of these modifications: YTH N6-Methyladenosine RNA Binding Protein 2 (YTHDF2), YTH Domain Containing 2 (YTHDC2), and reader FMRP Translational Regulator 1 (FMR1) transcript and protein abundance. The results demonstrate that PCB exposure alters the global epitranscriptome in a mouse model of NASH; however, the mechanism for these changes requires further investigation.

Arrow pushing in RNA modification sequencing

Methods to accurately determine the location and abundance of RNA modifications are critical to understanding their functional role. In this review, we describe recent efforts in which chemical reactivity and next-generation sequencing have been integrated to detect modified nucleotides in RNA. For eleven exemplary modifications, we detail chemical, enzymatic, and metabolic labeling protocols that can be used to differentiate them from canonical nucleobases. By emphasizing the molecular rationale underlying these detection methods, our survey highlights new opportunities for chemistry to define the role of RNA modifications in disease.

Mass spectrometric analysis of mRNA 5' terminal modifications

The 7-methylguanosine (m⁷G) cap structure, an essential epitranscriptomic mark at the 5' terminus of eukaryotic mRNAs, plays critical roles in mRNA stability, export, and translation. Following the cap structure, the first and second nucleotides at the 5' ends of mRNAs are frequently methylated to give more diverse modifications, especially in vertebrates. To understand the biological roles of the cap structures, precise analyses of the 5' terminal modifications are necessary. Here, we describe a detailed protocol for mass spectrometric analysis of 5' terminal fragments of mRNAs.

Upregulation of RNA cap methyltransferase RNMT drives ribosome biogenesis during T cell activation

The m7G cap is ubiquitous on RNAPII-transcribed RNA and has fundamental roles in eukaryotic gene expression, however its in vivo role in mammals has remained unknown. Here, we identified the m7G cap methyltransferase, RNMT, as a key mediator of T cell activation, which specifically regulates ribosome production. During T cell activation, induction of mRNA expression and ribosome biogenesis drives metabolic reprogramming, rapid proliferation and differentiation generating effector populations. We report that RNMT is induced by T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation and co-ordinates the mRNA, snoRNA and rRNA production required for ribosome biogenesis. Using transcriptomic and proteomic analyses, we demonstrate that RNMT selectively regulates the expression of terminal polypyrimidine tract (TOP) mRNAs, targets of the m7G-cap binding protein LARP1. The expression of LARP1 targets and snoRNAs involved in ribosome biogenesis is selectively compromised in Rnmt cKO CD4 T cells resulting in decreased ribosome synthesis, reduced translation rates and proliferation failure. By enhancing ribosome abundance, upregulation of RNMT co-ordinates mRNA capping and processing with increased translational capacity during T cell activation.

To cap it all off, again: dynamic capping and recapping of coding and non-coding RNAs to control transcript fate and biological activity

The addition of the methyl-7-guanosine (m⁷G) “cap” on the 5' ends of coding and some non-coding RNAs is essential for their protein coding capacity and biochemical activity, respectively. It was previously considered that capping was a constitutive process that generates a complete cap on all transcripts at steady-state. However, development of new methodologies demonstrated that steady-state capping is a dynamic and regulatable feature of many coding and non-coding RNAs. Indeed, capping status of specific RNAs can flux during differentiation and development, thereby impacting on their protein-coding capacity and activity. Moreover, in some primary cancer specimens, capping can be elevated for transcripts encoding proteins involved in proliferation and survival corresponding to their increased protein levels. Overexpression of one of the capping enzymes (RNMT), the transcription factor MYC or the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E all led to increased levels of steady-state capping of selected transcripts. Additionally, transcripts can be decapped and recapped, allowing these to be sequestered until needed. This review provides a summary of the major advances in enzymatic and affinity-based approaches to quantify m⁷G capping. Further, we summarize the evidence for regulation of capping. Capping has emerged as a significant regulatory step in RNA metabolism which is poised to impact a myriad of biological processes.

Chemo-Enzymatic Modification of the 5' Cap Maintains Translation and Increases Immunogenic Properties of mRNA

Eukaryotic mRNAs are emerging modalities for protein replacement therapy and vaccination. Their 5' cap is important for mRNA translation and immune response and can be naturally methylated at different positions by S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet)-dependent methyltransferases (MTases). We report on the cosubstrate scope of the MTase CAPAM responsible for methylation at the N6 -position of adenosine start nucleotides using synthetic AdoMet analogs. The chemo-enzymatic propargylation enabled production of site-specifically modified reporter-mRNAs. These cap-propargylated mRNAs were efficiently translated and showed ≈3-fold increased immune response in human cells. The same effects were observed when the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2-a currently tested epitope for mRNA vaccination-was used. Site-specific chemo-enzymatic modification of eukaryotic mRNA may thus be a suitable strategy to modulate translation and immune response of mRNAs for future therapeutic applications.

Quantification of mRNA cap-modifications by means of LC-QqQ-MS

Enzymatic modification of the 5'-cap is a versatile approach to modulate the properties of mRNAs. Transfer of methyl groups from S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) or functional moieties from non-natural analogs by methyltransferases (MTases) allows for site-specific modifications at the cap. These modifications have been used to tune translation or control it in a temporal manner and even influence immunogenicity of mRNA. For quantification of the MTase-mediated cap modification, liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) provides the required sensitivity and accuracy. Here, we describe the complete workflow starting from in vitro transcription to produce mRNAs, via their enzymatic modification at the cap with natural or non-natural moieties to the quantification of these cap-modifications by LC-QqQ-MS.

Cap 1 Messenger RNA Synthesis with Co-transcriptional CleanCap® Analog by In Vitro Transcription

Synthetic messenger RNA (mRNA)-based therapeutics are an increasingly popular approach to gene and cell therapies, genome engineering, enzyme replacement therapy, and now, during the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, vaccine development. mRNA for such purposes can be synthesized through an enzymatic in vitro transcription (IVT) reaction and formulated for in vivo delivery. Mature mRNA requires a 5'-cap for gene expression and mRNA stability. There are two methods to add a cap in vitro: via a two-step multi-enzymatic reaction or co-transcriptionally. Co-transcriptional methods minimize reaction steps and enzymes needed to make mRNA when compared to enzymatic capping. CleanCap^® AG co-transcriptional capping results in 5 mg/ml of IVT with 94% 5'-cap 1 structure. This is highly efficient compared to first-generation cap analogs, such as mCap and ARCA, that incorporate cap 0 structures at lower efficiency and reaction yield. This article describes co-transcriptional capping using TriLink Biotechnology's CleanCap^® AG in IVT. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: IVT with CleanCap Basic Protocol 2: mRNA purification and analysis.

New Twists in Detecting mRNA Modification Dynamics

Modified nucleotides in mRNA are an essential addition to the standard genetic code of four nucleotides in animals, plants, and their viruses. The emerging field of epitranscriptomics examines nucleotide modifications in mRNA and their impact on gene expression. The low abundance of nucleotide modifications and technical limitations, however, have hampered systematic analysis of their occurrence and functions. Selective chemical and immunological identification of modified nucleotides has revealed global candidate topology maps for many modifications in mRNA, but further technical advances to increase confidence will be necessary. Single-molecule sequencing introduced by Oxford Nanopore now promises to overcome such limitations, and we summarize current progress with a particular focus on the bioinformatic challenges of this novel sequencing technology.

The multifaceted eukaryotic cap structure

The 5' cap structure is added onto RNA polymerase II transcripts soon after initiation of transcription and modulates several post-transcriptional regulatory events involved in RNA maturation. It is also required for stimulating translation initiation of many cytoplasmic mRNAs and serves to protect mRNAs from degradation. These functional properties of the cap are mediated by several cap binding proteins (CBPs) involved in nuclear and cytoplasmic gene expression steps. The role that CBPs play in gene regulation, as well as the biophysical nature by which they recognize the cap, is quite intricate. Differences in mechanisms of capping as well as nuances in cap recognition speak to the potential of targeting these processes for drug development. In this review, we focus on recent findings concerning the cap epitranscriptome, our understanding of cap binding by different CBPs, and explore therapeutic targeting of CBP-cap interaction. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Recognition RNA Processing > Capping and 5' End Modifications Translation > Translation Mechanisms.