Detection of gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis using 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography

Semiquantitative analysis using whole-body dynamic F-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether whole-body dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) is useful for differentiating benign and malignant lesions.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, data from a cohort of 146 lesions from 187 patients who consecutively underwent whole-body dynamic PET scans at our hospital for suspected lesions in the lung, lymph nodes, liver, bone, esophagus, and colon were analyzed. Patients with malignant lymphomas, accumulations > 5 cm in length along the long axis of the esophagus, or lesions in the colon in which the site of accumulation moved during the imaging period were excluded. Patients were administered 3.7 MBq/kg of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG), and dynamic imaging was initiated 60 min after administration. We defined the 60-65, 65-70, 70-75, and 75-80 min time mark as the first, second, third, and fourth pass, respectively. The static image is the summed average of all the four pass images. We measured the accumulation in the mean image of the whole-body dynamic PET scan, which was arithmetically similar to the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) throughout the whole-body static images obtained during 20 min of imaging (S-SUVmax). The ratio of SUVmax in the dynamic first pass(60-65 min after FDG administration) and fourth pass(75-80 min after FDG administration) was calculated as R-SUVmax.

RESULTS

The S-SUVmax in the lung, lymph nodes, and bone did not differ significantly between the benign and malignant groups. However, there was a significant difference in R-SUVmax, which was > 1 in most malignant lesions indicating an increase in accumulation during routine scan time. Significant differences were observed between benign and malignant lesions of the liver in both S-SUVmax and R-SUVmax values, with the latter being > 1 in most malignant lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-body dynamic PET for 20 min starting 1 h after FDG administration improved the accuracy of malignant lesion detection in the liver, lymph nodes, lung, and bone. The incremental improvement was small, and the FDG dynamics in the distribution of values between benign and malignant overlapped. Additional information from whole-body dynamic imaging can help detect malignant lesions in these sites without increasing patient burden or prolonging imaging time.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Epigastric Pain

Epigastric pain can have multiple etiologies including myocardial infarction, pancreatitis, acute aortic syndromes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and hiatal hernia. This document focuses on the scenarios in which epigastric pain is accompanied by symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and hematemesis, which raise suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or hiatal hernia. Although endoscopy may be the test of choice for diagnosing these entities, patients may present with nonspecific or overlapping symptoms, necessitating the use of imaging prior to or instead of endoscopy. The utility of fluoroscopic imaging, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET for these indications are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

A Comparison Study of Esophageal Findings on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the esophageal findings of 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed (18)F-FDG PET/CT and EGD findings of 369 subjects who underwent medical examination between January 2014 and December 2014. The range and intensity of esophageal (18)F-FDG uptake were visually analyzed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the esophagus and around the esophagogastric (EG) junction was measured. EGD results were provided by the gastroenterologist. We compared the esophageal findings obtained using (18)F-FDG PET/CT and EGD.

RESULTS

There were typical linear FDG uptakes in (18)F-FDG PET/CT patients who underwent EGD the same day. In visual analysis of the range and intensity of the (18)F-FDG uptake, the patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and EGD on the same day showed relatively diffuse and discernible (18)F-FDG uptake in the esophagus. Reflux esophagitis was diagnosed in 59 subjects, and 27 of these were classified as higher than Los Angeles classification A. With an increasing degree of reflux esophagitis observed on EGD, the SUVmax in the esophagus and around the EG junction was also increased.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that FDG uptake at the esophagus or the EG junction might be clinically significantly related to esophagitis. However, EGD performed before (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the same day may affect the esophageal (18)F-FDG uptake.

Significance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake at the Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of PET to Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) occasionally reveals unexpected uptake of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). The aim of this study was to determine the importance of unexpected (18)F-FDG uptake at the GEJ on PET/CT by correlating this finding with endoscopy results.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records from June 2009 to October 2012 to identify patients in our Veterans Affairs Medical Center who had an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) performed within 6 months of a PET/CT. Metabolic activity at the GEJ was quantified with standardized uptake values (SUV) and correlated with EGD and histopathology results.

RESULTS

A total of 219 patients were identified and assigned to one of five groups based upon EGD findings: esophageal malignancy (n = 34), esophagitis (n = 21), Barrett's esophagus (n = 8), other non-malignant disorders (n = 5), and normal (n = 151). The mean SUV Max for the groups was 6.72, 2.47, 2.40, 3.48, and 2.06, respectively. SUV Max and SUV Mean were significantly higher in the esophageal malignancy group than in all other groups (p < 0.001). SUV for patients with high-grade esophagitis was greater than in patients with low-grade esophagitis. A SUV Max ≥ 3.5 was found to predict necessity for EGD with a positive predictive value of 79 %. A SUV Max ≤ 2.2 yielded a negative predictive value of 86 %.

CONCLUSION

Differentiation between benign and potentially significant disease at the GEJ may be possible with quantification of incidental (18)F-FDG uptake at PET/CT. Our results suggest thresholds that may help determine need for further endoscopic evaluation in patients with abnormal metabolic activity at the GEJ.

FDG PET/CT in eosinophilic esophagitis

A 37-year-old man presented with left upper abdominal pain for 13 months. Laboratory examinations showed elevated peripheral eosinophils. Chest CT showed thickened wall of the entire esophagus. FDG PET/CT was performed showing diffuse FDG uptake in the thickened esophageal wall. Esophageal endoscopy showed pale and edematous mucosa. Histologic examination of the esophageal biopsy specimens revealed marked eosinophil infiltration of the mucosa. The clinical and pathologic findings were consistent with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). This case indicates EoE should be included in the differential diagnosis of abnormal FDG accumulation in the esophageal wall along with malignant and nonmalignant conditions.

Management of incidental esophageal uptake on FDG PET/CT

A 51-year-old Caucasian man with a history of colon carcinoma, status post right hemicolectomy, now with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen underwent positron emission tomography (PET)/CT for evaluation of tumour recurrence. An incidental focal esophageal uptake was noted on PET/CT, without associated mass. Subsequent endoscopy revealed Barrett's esophagus. The second patient, a 63-year-old Caucasian man, underwent a PET/CT to characterise a 12 mm lung nodule. The PET/CT had linear diffuse uptake within the esophagus. Endoscopy and biopsy findings were consistent with reflux esophagitis. This case report discusses management of incidental esophageal uptake on fludeoxyglucose PET/CT.

Association of esophageal inflammation, obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease: from FDG PET/CT perspective

OBJECTIVE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with bothersome symptoms and neoplastic progression into Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. We aim to determine the correlation between GERD, esophageal inflammation and obesity with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

METHODS

We studied 458 subjects who underwent a comprehensive health check-up, which included an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, FDG PET/CT and complete anthropometric measures. GERD symptoms were evaluated with Reflux Disease Questionnaire. Endoscopically erosive esophagitis was scored using the Los Angeles classification system. Inflammatory activity, represented by standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of FDG at pre-determined locations of esophagus, stomach and duodenum, were compared. Association between erosive esophagitis, FDG activity and anthropometric evaluation, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Subjects with erosive esophagitis (n = 178, 38.9%) had significantly higher SUVmax at middle esophagus (2.69±0.74 vs. 2.41±0.57, P<.001) and esophagogastric junction (3.10±0.89 vs. 2.38±0.57, P<.001), marginally higher at upper esophageal sphincter (2.29±0.42 vs. 2.21±0.48, P = .062), but not in stomach or duodenum. The severity of erosive esophagitis correlated with SUVmax and subjects with Barrett's esophagus had the highest SUVmax at middle esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Heartburn positively correlated with higher SUVmax at middle oesophagus (r = .262, P = .003). Using multivariate regression analyses, age (P = .027), total cholesterol level (P = .003), alcohol drinking (P = .03), subcutaneous adipose tissue (P<.001), BMI (P<.001) and waist circumference (P<.001) were independently associated with higher SUVmax at respective esophageal locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal inflammation demonstrated by FDG PET/CT correlates with endoscopic findings and symptomatology of GERD. Obesity markers, both visceral and general, are independent determinants of esophageal inflammation.