Radiographic Detection of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture without Collapse

Bone Scintigraphy for Guidance of Targeted Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures

Background: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are prevalent in the elderly population and might be the source of back pain if they are fresh and yet unhealed. In many cases, it is a diagnostic challenge to differentiate fresh VCFs from healed united fractures, which retain similar radiographic characteristics but no longer generate pain. This information is crucial for appropriate management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of bone scintigraphy (BS) in identifying fresh VCFs appropriate for targeted treatment when compared to the findings of Computerized Tomography (CT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 190 patients with back pain suspected to stem from a recent VCF that underwent both a CT and a BS and compared the imaging patterns per vertebra. Results: The studies were concordant in the majority of cases (95.5%), diagnosing 84.4% normal vertebrae, 6.4% acute VCFs, and 4.7% chronic VCFs. However, in 37 patients, 45 occult acute VCFs were only detected on BS and not on CT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that these patients were older and had lower bone density compared to the rest of the study population. Additionally, 40 patients had acute VCFs visible on CT, but with no increased or low intensity uptake on BS. These cases were associated with a shorter time period between trauma and BS, a higher prevalence of male patients, and a higher bone density. Acute VCFs with no increased uptake or low levels of uptake were found only within the first six days of the trauma. Conclusions: BS detects radiologically occult fractures and can differentiate if a radiographically evident VCF is indeed clinically active, guiding possible treatment options. To avoid missing acute VCFs, BS should be performed six days or more after the injury.

Conversion of osteoporotic vertebral fracture severity score to osteoporosis T-score equivalent status: a framework and a comparative study of Hong Kong Chinese and Rome Caucasian older women

We explored how the severity of radiological osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) can be converted to the equivalent T-score values.

INTRODUCTION

To perform a study to define what portion of older community women with what severity of radiographic OVF correspond to what low T-score status.

METHODS

There were age-matched 301 Italian community women and 301 Chinese community women (sub-group A, age, 73.6 ± 6.1 years). In addition, Chinese sub-groups B and C included 110 community women (age, 68.9 ± 5.5 years) and 101 community women (age: 82.2 ± 4.3 years), respectively. For each vertebra in women, a score of 0, - 0.5, - 1, - 1.5, - 2, - 2.5, and - 3 was assigned for no OVF or OVF of < 20%, ≥ 20 ~ 25%, ≥ 25% ~ 1/3, ≥ 1/3 ~ 40%, ≥ 40%-2/3, and ≥ 2/3 vertebral height loss, respectively, OVFss was defined as the summed score of vertebrae T4 to L5. OVFss and T-scores were ranked from the smallest to the largest values.

RESULTS

For the Chinese total group (sub-groups A, B, and C together), OVFss = - 1 corresponded to lowest T-score (lowest T-score of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip) of - 3.4 ~ - 3.2. OVFss ≤ - 1.5 corresponded to femoral neck T-score ≤ - 2.5. OVFss = -1.5 corresponded to a mean femoral neck T-score of - 3.0, - 2.6, and - 2.4, among Chinese sub-groups B, A, and C subjects, respectively. For Italians, all cases with OVFss ≤ - 1 had lowest T-score ≤ - 2.5. For cases with femoral neck T-score = - 2.5, 41.7% had OVFss = - 1.5, and 58.3% had OVFss = - 1.

CONCLUSION

For older women, statistically OVFss ≤ - 1 suggests this subject is osteoporotic according to lowest T-score. If using femoral neck T-score, OVFss ≤ - 1.5 qualifies osteoporosis diagnosis.

Chest radiograph prevalence of vertebral deformity among young and middle-aged population of mixed city dwellers and rural residents

Background

To interpret the importance of minimal and mild vertebral deformities (VDs) among elderly subjects, we need to know their prevalence among mostly non-osteoporotic subjects.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed VDs among 408 female and 374 male patients who had lateral chest radiographs due to mild illness or for routine healthcheck, all with indications other than spine disorders or metabolic disorders. The study subjects were divided into four age groups, i.e., ≤20, 20-34, 35-44, and ≥45 years. For those aged >20 years, 27.2% females had family roots from farming communities, and 26.4% males had the history of being a farmer or physical laborer (this was 36.1% for males aged ≥45 years). Fracture shaped vertebral deformities (FSVDs) were VDs radiographically indistinguishable from vertebral fracture. Acquired short vertebrae were those with decreased vertebral anterior and middle heights, while without anterior wedging or bi-concave changes, and the diagnosis required at least two adjacent short vertebrae in the same subject.

Results

Congenital VDs were observed in four cases (three males, one female). In the age group of ≤20, 20-34, 35-44, and ≥45 years, females had any FSVD prevalence of 13.4%, 8.3%, 11.8%, 25.8% respectively, while the prevalence was 29.3%, 26%, 34.3%, 44.8% respectively for males. From the female ≤20 years group to the 21-34 years group, cases involved multiple vertebrae decreased from 53.8% to 16.7%. For cases ≤34 years, no female case had ≥ mild FSVD (which was defined to have ≥20% vertebral height loss), while five male cases had ≥ mild FSVD. For the 35-44 years group, vertebral endplate depression was noted among 2.0% of the females and 2.9% of the males. Among the cases aged ≤44 years, there was only one male and one female had acquired short vertebrae. For the male cases, acquired short vertebrae prevalence was 15.6% in the group of ≥45 years.

Conclusions

FSVD is common among young and middle-aged population (≤44 years) assumed with normal bone strength, and with a higher FSVD prevalence among men. FSVD may heal among younger subjects, and physical labor may increase VD prevalence.

Radiological features of traumatic vertebral endplate fracture: an analysis of 194 cases with 263 vertebral fractures

BACKGROUND

The importance of identifying osteoporotic vertebral endplate or/and cortex fracture (ECF), which primarily includes endplate fracture (EPF) and vertebral anterior cortex buckling, has been recognized. However, some old traumatic ECFs with healing process in the elderly may be mistaken as osteoporotic. This study analyzes the radiological features of traumatic EPF.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 194 spine trauma patients with 263 vertebral fractures (mean age: 42.11 ± 9.82 years, 118 males and 76 females). All patients had traumatic EPF identified by X-ray/CT/MRI.

RESULTS

The involved vertebra was mostly L1 (29.7%), followed by T12 and L2. Except EPFs involved both superior and inferior endplates (12.6%), only 1.9% involved inferior endplate alone, with the majority involved superior endplate. If each endplate was divided into five segments of equal lengths (from anterior to posterior: a1, a2, m, p2, p1), the most depressed point of superior EPFs was mostly at segment-a2 (approximately 45%), followed by segment-a1 (approximately 20%) or segment-m (approximately 20%), and very rarely at segment-p1. The upper 1/3 of anterior vertebral wall was more likely to fracture, followed by middle 1/3 of anterior wall. For posterior vertebral wall fracture, 68.5% broke the bony wall surrounding the basivertebral vain. 58.6%, 30.0%, and 11.4% of vertebral fractures had <1/5, 1/5-1/3, and >1/3 vertebral body height loss. As the extent of vertebral height loss increased, the chance of having both superior and inferior EPFs also increased; however, the chance of having inferior EPF alone did not increase.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic EPF features are characterized, which may help the differentiation of traumatic and osteoporotic EPFs.

Radiographic osteoporotic vertebral fractures in elderly men: a brief review focusing on differences between the sexes

Bone loss occurs in both sexes as a result of ageing but is exacerbated in women by the hormonal changes associated with menopause. Unlike in women, secondary osteoporosis occurs in almost half of men diagnosed with osteoporosis. Moreover, vertebral fractures (VFs) seen in elderly men may more likely be the result of high energy trauma. The osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) radiograph diagnosis criteria for women may not be directly applicable for men. Particular attention should be paid to the mid-thoracic level where over-diagnosis commonly occurs. For wedge-shaped vertebral deformities (VDs) or VDs with anterior height reduction only, a diagnosis of OVF requires great caution, as they are poorly correlated to bone mineral density (BMD). For age-matched subjects, it is likely that elderly men's prevalent radiographic OVFs are approximately half of the elderly women's. This male-female ratio is very similar to other clinical fractures such as those occurring at the hip. Even so, the clinical relevance of OVF in elderly men may be less than that of elderly women. On the other hand, for elderly men with hip BMD-based osteoporosis, the OVF risk is as high as that of osteoporotic women. Elderly Chinese men have a lower OVF prevalence than age-matched Caucasian men.

Diagnosis and grading of radiographic osteoporotic vertebral deformity by general radiologists after a brief self-learning period

Background

The expanded semi-quantitative (eSQ) osteoporotic vertebral deformity (OVD) classification has minimal, mild, moderate, moderately-severe, severe, and collapsed grades with <20%, 20–25%, >25%–1/3, >1/3–40%, >40%–2/3, >2/3 vertebral height loss respectively. This study evaluates the performance of using this grading criterion by radiology readers who did not have former training in OVD assessment.

Methods

Spine radiographs of 44 elderly women with 278 normal appearing vertebrae and 65 OVDs were selected, with two senior readers agreed the reference reading. Three readers from Italy and three readers from China were invited to evaluate these radiographs after reading five reference articles including one detailing eSQ criteria with illustrative examples. Before the second round of reading, the readers were asked to read an additional explanatory document. For the readers in Italy an additional on-line demonstration was given on how to measure vertebral height loss in another five cases of OVD. Two Chinese readers had a third round of reading after a 90 minutes’ on-line lecture.

Results

The final absolute agreement rate with the reference reading (i.e., exactly the same grading as the reference) ranged between 46.2% to 68.2% for the six readers, and the final relative agreement (with one eSQ grade difference allowed) ranged between 78.5% to 92.5%. The >1 grade disagreement rate was all below 11%, and mostly below 7%. The missed OVD were mostly minimal grade. The rate for missing a ≥ mild OVD was <4.5%, and false positive rate was generally <1.4% among the final reading. If the minimal grade was removed and the remaining gradings were converted to Genant’s semi-quantitative (GSQ) grading, the mean kappa values against the reference reading for SQ grades-1,2,3 were 0.813, 0.814, and 0.916 respectively.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates good performance of the six learner readers for assessing radiographic after a brief self-learning period.

Recognizing osteoporotic vertebral deformity on frontal view radiograph: a cohort analysis and a pictorial review

PURPOSE

Opportunities exist to detect osteoporotic vertebral deformities (VDs) on frontal radiograph (FR) indicated for lung or abdominal diseases, while literature have been mostly based on lateral radiograph (LR). This study analyzed the detectability of moderate and severe grades VD on FR.

METHODS

There were 105 female cases (mean 72 years, range 55~93 year), who were referred for digital spine FR and LR with back and/or leg pain. The LR and FR were read, osteoporotic VDs with < 20%, 20-25%, 25-40%, and > 40% vertebral body height loss were recorded as minimal, mild, moderate, and severe grades, respectively. After a 10-month interval, only FRs were read again, and each vertebra was classified as (1) no notable VD, (2) with notable VD, and (3) ambiguous. The first reading was the reference, while the second reading was allowed to miss minimal/mild VCD and endplate/cortex fracture.

RESULTS

Counting by subjects, for 98 cases, the two reading sessions had agreement, including 43 "true negative" cases and 55 true positive cases. There were two false positive cases, and five ambiguous cases. In total, 1286 vertebra were assessed, FR reading had 1126 vertebrae "true negative," 130 vertebrae true positive, one vertebra false negative, 3 vertebrae false positive, and 26 ambiguous vertebrae (65.4% being true negative and 34.6% being true positive). Most of the disagreements were associated with kyphosis or poor X-ray projection. Nineteen illustrative cases are presented graphically.

CONCLUSION

Moderate and severe grades of VD are identifiable on FR as long as the involved vertebrae are clearly filmed.

Semi-quantitative grading and extended semi-quantitative grading for osteoporotic vertebral deformity: a radiographic image database for education and calibration

The Genant’s semi-quantitative (GSQ) criteria is currently the most used approach in epidemiology studies and clinical trials for osteoporotic vertebral deformity (OVD) evaluation with radiograph. The qualitative diagnosis with radiological knowledge helps to minimize false positive readings. However, unless there is a face-to-face training with experienced readers, it can be difficult to apply GSQ criteria by only reading the text description of Genant et al. (in 1993), even for a musculoskeletal radiologist. We propose an expanded semi-quantitative (eSQ) OVD classification with the following features: (I) GSQ grade-0.5 is noted as minimal grade (eSQ grade-1) for OVDs with height loss <20%; (II) GSQ mild grade (grade-1) is the same as eSQ mild grade (grade-2); (III) GSQ moderate grade (grade-2) is subdivided into eSQ grade-3 (moderate, >25%–1/3 height loss) and eSQ grade-4 (moderately-severe, >1/3–40% height loss); (IV) GSQ severe grade is subdivided into eSQ grade-5 (severe, >40%–2/3 height loss) and eSQ grade-6 (collapsed, with >2/3 height loss). We advocate to estimate vertebral height loss with adjacent vertebral heights as the reference (rather than using individual vertebra’s posterior height as the reference). This article presents radiographs of 36 cases with OVD, together with gradings using GSQ criteria and eSQ criteria. The examples in this article can serve as teaching material or calibration database for readers who will use GSQ criteria or eSQ criteria. Our approach for quantitative measurement is explained graphically.

Corrigendum to how to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.09.10.].

How to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture?

A vertebral deformity (VD) is not always a vertebral fracture (VF). Because of lack of a completely satisfactory "gold standard", there is no consensus on the exact definition of a VF. Therefore, it may sometimes be difficult, especially in mild cases, to discriminate the prevalent VF from a non-fracture deformity or short vertebral height (SVH). A combined standardized approach based on qualitative and semiquantitative (SQ) vertebral assessment may be the most option to correctly identify a VD as a VF. However this visual approach for VF identification is subjective, therefore it is mandatory an adequate training and experience of radiologist to reach a good sensitivity and specificity. Vertebral morphometry, objective and reproducible method, could be used only to evaluate the severity of VFs but requires the availability of reference values of vertebral height ratios. There is actually an evidentiary basis for suggesting that a qualitative approach by expert radiologists to morphological vertebral assessment, combined SQ and morphometric methods seem to be the preferred option for the correct diagnosis of VF as endplate or/and cortex fracture (ECF) or severe vertebral height loss.

Percutaneous kyphoplasty assisted with/without mixed reality technology in treatment of OVCF with IVC: a prospective study

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) assisted with mixed reality (MR) technology in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) with intravertebral vacuum cleft (IVC).

Method

Forty cases of OVCF with IVC undergoing PKP were randomized into a MR technology-assisted group (group A) and a traditional C-arm fluoroscopy group (group B). Both groups were performed PKP and evaluated by VAS scores, ODI scores, radiological evidence of vertebral body height, and kyphotic angle (KA) at pre-operation and post-operation. The volume of injected cement, fluoroscopy times, and operation time were recorded. And cases of non-PMMA-endplates-contact(NPEC) in radiological evidence was also recorded postoperatively. The clinical outcomes and complications were evaluated afterwards. All patients received 10 to 14 months follow-up, with an average of 12 months.

Result

This MR-assisted group (group A) acquired more about the amount of the polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) injection and postoperative vertebral height and less about postoperative KA, fluoroscopy times, and operation time compared with the control group (group B) (P < 0.05). The VAS scores and ODI scores in both groups have improved, but more significantly in group A (P < 0.05). Also, more cases achieve both-endplates-touching of cement in group A (P < 0.05). And there are less of the loss of vertebral height, KA, and occurrence of re-collapse of the vertebra in group A during the follow-up (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

PKP assisted with MR technology can accurately orientate the position of IVC area, which can be augmented by the balloon leading to more satisfied vertebral height improvement, cement diffusion, and pain relief.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03959059. Registered 25 September 2016.

Multilevel Contiguous Osteoporotic Lumbar Compression Fractures: The Relationship of Scoliosis to the Development of Cascading Fractures

Osteoporotic patients can present with either single or multiple fractures secondary to repeated falls and progressive osteoporosis. Multiple fractures often lead to additional spinal deformity and are a sign of more severe osteoporosis. In the thoracic spine, multiple fractures are associated with the development of gradual thoracic kyphosis but neurologic deficits are uncommon. In the lumbar spine, patients with multiple lumbar fractures have more constant lumbar pain, may have symptoms related to concurrent lumbar stenosis or degenerative scoliosis, and may present with radiculopathy, especially with fractures at L4 and L5. In a review of a series of patients with recurrent multiple lumbar fractures or 'cascading' fractures, it was found that all the patients were female, had severe osteoporosis, often untreated, had a previous history of multiple previous thoracic and lumbar fractures, and all had associated scoliotic spinal deformities ranging from 6^o to 50^o. It was found that if the curve progressed and the greater the degree of curvature, the more frequently subsequent multiple fractures developed, leading to recurrent acute episodes of pain. Forty percent also had additional sacral insufficiency fractures, an unusually high percentage. Biomechanically, the lumbar spine is both more mobile and supports a larger portion of the spinal load compared to the thoracic spine. The existence or worsening of a lumbar spinal deformity from degenerative lumbar scoliosis shifts the mechanical forces more to one side on already weakened osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae and sacrum, leading to an increased incidence of these fractures. Because of the chronic and uneven lower lumbar spinal load with severe vertebral osteoporosis in certain patients with repeat lumbar fractures and worsening degenerative lumbar scoliosis, there may be a rationale to add preventive vertebroplasty at adjacent vertebral endplates when treating acute recurrent lumbar fractures to decrease the incidence of recurrence in other vertebrae.

Progression of Vertebral Compression Fractures After Previous Vertebral Augmentation: Technical Reasons for Recurrent Fractures in a Previously Treated Vertebra

It is well recognized that patients can develop additional vertebral compression fractures (VCF) in an adjacent vertebra or at another vertebral level after successful vertebral augmentation. Factors such as the patient's bone mineral density, post procedure activity, and chronic corticosteroid use contribute to an increased risk of re-fracture or development of new fractures in the first three months after the initial procedure. However, there is a very small subgroup of patients that have unchanged or worse pain after the vertebral augmentation that may indicate continued progression of the treated compression fracture or a recurrent fracture at the previously treated level. This review examines the clinical findings, radiologic signs, and intraprocedural technical failures that may occur during the initial vertebral augmentation that can lead to a progressive fracture in a previously treated vertebra. Causes of failure of the initial vertebral augmentation procedure include inadequate or incomplete filling of the fracture site, the cement missing the actual fracture allowing continued osteoporotic compression, and persistent or worsened intravertebral fluid-filled clefts. The existence of an unfilled intravertebral fluid cleft on preoperative diagnostic studies is the most important indicator of risk for progression as is the later development of fluid at the bone cement interface.

Misdiagnosis of vertebral fractures on local radiographic readings of the multicentre POINT (Prevalence of Osteoporosis in INTernal medicine) study

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) are often misdiagnosed because asymptomatic and occurring in the absence of specific trauma. Further, diagnostic assessment of VFs may be suboptimal.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To assess the misdiagnosis of vertebral fractures on local radiographic readings in the cohort of patients enrolled in the POINT study.

METHODS

We enrolled hospitalised patients, admitted for any cause to the Internal Medicine Units of 37 hospitals participating to the cross-sectional previously published POINT study. The assessment of VFs was performed both by local radiologists and by two expert skeletal radiologists, by using semiquantitative method (SQ). To better evaluate mild vertebral deformities, the two central radiologists also used the algorithm-based qualitative assessment (ABQ).

RESULTS

The radiographs of 661 patients (401 females; mean age 75.8±8.0) were evaluated. The inter-reader percent agreement between two central expert radiologists per-vertebra assessment was excellent (99.78%; k=0.984; 95% CI, 0.977-0.991). Central reading identified 318/661 (48.1%) patients with at least one VF. Local and central readings agreed in 502/661 (75.9%) patients, resulting in a fair reproducibility (k=0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.59). Diagnostic performance parameters of local readings were: sensitivity 76.1%; specificity 75.8%; PPV 74.46%; NPV 77.38%). By examining 9254 vertebrae, central and local readers diagnosed 665 (7.2%) and 562 (6.1%) VFs respectively. Misdiagnosis (102 false positives and 205 false negatives) mainly occurred for mild VFs. Local readings identified correctly 460 out 665 VFs diagnosed by central readings, resulting in sensitivity of 69.2% and PPV of 81.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Following a standardized protocol of acquisition techniques and of interpretation criteria, an excellent agreement between local and central readings for moderate and severe vertebral fractures resulted. However a significant amount of mild vertebral fractures, that are the most of VFs, were misdiagnosed by local radiologists. In order to improve VFs assessment, the radiologists should be trained and sensitized in relation to the relevant clinical significance of osteoporotic VFs identification.

Delayed Recognition of Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebral Compression Fractures in Minor Accident Cases

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) in the elderly are commonly diagnosed after a minor fall or trauma; however, the majority of these patients have either been previously evaluated for osteoporosis or are already under some form of medical treatment for osteoporosis at the time of the fall. Although accidents are a known cause of VCFs, these fractures are too often undiagnosed. In reviewing a group of patients seen after minor falls or automobile accidents who were complaining of general spine pain, we found a smaller subgroup with previously undiagnosed VCFs. These fractures were also the initial signs of a previously unrecognized osteoporotic process. Initial diagnosis, treatment, and therapy were usually focused on other spinal segments (i.e. mainly the lumbar spine) until both the VCF and the osteoporosis were identified. The purpose of this report is to raise awareness and discuss the steps for improved diagnosis of osteoporotic VCFs.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a large group of patients from one pain/accident clinic in a 24 month period. These patients were diagnosed with VCFs subsequent to the initial evaluation due to either persistent pain after conservative therapy or complaints of pain beyond the original injured area (i.e. typically the lumbar spine). At this point, a more detailed history was taken, including any past treatment for osteoporosis, or previous falls or injury to exclude the possibility of pre-existing fractures. A more focused examination of the painful area was completed, consisting of percussion at the fracture site identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan. If possible, a bone scan was ordered to separate acute and subacute traumatic fractures from old/chronic fractures. Additionally, we surveyed two other similar pain/accident clinics who saw a comparable number and population of patients diagnosed with VCFs within a 24 month period to make a comparison of the number of VCFs they identified.

Ten out of approximately 2700 patients seen over a 24 month period sustained acute thoracic or lumbar VCFs during a minor accident and were not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis. Since approximately 30% of the 2,700 patients had new accidents, 10 out of 800 new patients (1.25%) were found to have VCFs without a known history of osteoporosis. Two other surveyed pain/accident, clinics saw a similar number and population of patients in the same time period; however, each only diagnosed two or three VCFs while examining a similar number of patients in the clinic. In these two other clinics, a much lower percentage (0.3%) of patients were diagnosed with new VCFs.

Awareness of the possibility of osteoporotic VCFs is the first step in detecting them. This study reveals the presence of a small but real risk of overlooking osteoporotic VCFs in minor trauma cases. When necessary, repeat or obtain better quality imaging in spinal segments affected by persistent pain. The thoracolumbar junction (i.e. T12 & L1 vertebrae) is especially at risk for sustaining VCFs. The delayed recognition of these VCFs and the patient's underlying osteoporosis after minor accident cases could present a major problem, as the critical time for patients to receive the proper medical or surgical treatments responsible for correcting and preventing further spinal deformity and pain has been reduced.

[Spinal fractures]

Osteoporotic spinal fractures are typical age-related fragility fractures. Their impact on the quality of life is often underestimated; therefore, anti-osteoporotic drug treatment according to the current guidelines is essential. Occult vertebral fractures may be difficult to detect and a differentiation between fresh and old fractures is often only possible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to reveal cancellous bone edema. Treatment recommendations are predominantly based on traumatic fractures in younger adults and are thus not applicable in orthogeriatrics. A new classification currently under validation and presented in this article was developed in order to aid decision-making for operative interventions. Minimally invasive treatment options include vertebroplasty, kyphopasty and internal fixation. The application of cement provides additional stability but can be accompanied by cement-specific complications, such as extravasation and embolism.

Violet Fox: A Clinical View of Vertebral Fractures

Had Violet's abdominal MR not been performed, or its findings not appreciated, the cause of her clinical event might never have been known because our current concept of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (VF) is substantially predicated on a change in either vertebral height or shape on lateral or sagittal spine imaging. The intention of this commentary is to stimulate a multidisciplinary conversation of osteoporotic VFs from an integrated clinical, physiological, and imaging perspective. For research and epidemiological purposes, osteoporotic VFs have been defined as a reduction in anterior, middle, or posterior vertebral height although the required minimum height reduction (e.g., 15% or 20%) varies among definition schemes. We further classify osteoporotic VFs to be "clinical" when they are accompanied by back pain and "morphometric" when they are not, and we have generally accepted the assertion that most of the osteoporotic VFs are painless, that is, morphometric. This dichotomous VF definition scheme has been the foundation of osteoporosis epidemiology and the primary endpoint in most pivotal osteoporosis pharmaceutical trials. Although, having served the osteoporosis community well, our clinical experience, refined by recent insights into vertebral anatomy and spinal biomechanics, advances in vertebral imaging, and 2 decades of vertebral augmentation suggest that the spectrum of osteoporotic VFs is more complicated than this scheme suggests.