RAP80-directed tuning of BRCA1 homologous recombination function at ionizing radiation-induced nuclear foci

H3K27M diffuse midline glioma is homologous recombination defective and sensitized to radiotherapy and NK cell-mediated antitumor immunity by PARP inhibition

Background

Radiotherapy (RT) is the primary treatment for diffuse midline glioma (DMG), a lethal pediatric malignancy defined by histone H3 lysine 27-to-methionine (H3K27M) mutation. Based on the loss of H3K27 trimethylation producing broad epigenomic alterations, we hypothesized that H3K27M causes a functional double-strand break (DSB) repair defect that could be leveraged therapeutically with PARP inhibitor and RT for selective radiosensitization and antitumor immune responses.

Methods

H3K27M isogenic DMG cells and orthotopic brainstem DMG tumors in immune deficient and syngeneic, immune competent mice were used to evaluate the efficacy and mechanisms of PARP1/2 inhibition by olaparib or PARP1 inhibition by AZD9574 with concurrent RT.

Results

H3K27M mutation caused an HRR defect characterized by impaired RT-induced K63-linked polyubiquitination of histone H1 and inhibition of HRR protein recruitment. H3K27M DMG cells were selectively radiosensitized by olaparib in comparison to isogenic controls, and this effect translated to efficacy in H3K27M orthotopic brainstem tumors. Olaparib and RT induced an innate immune response and induction of NK cell (NKG2D) activating ligands leading to increased NK cell-mediated lysis of DMG tumor cells. In immunocompetent syngeneic orthotopic DMG tumors, either olaparib or AZD9574 in combination with RT enhanced intratumoral NK cell infiltration and activity in association with NK cell-mediated therapeutic responses and favorable activity of AZD9574.

Conclusions

The HRR deficiency in H3K27M DMG can be therapeutically leveraged with PARP inhibitors to radiosensitize and induce an NK cell-mediated antitumor immune response selectively in H3K27M DMG, supporting the clinical investigation of best-in-class PARP inhibitors with RT in DMG patients.

Key points

H3K27M DMG are HRR defective and selectively radiosensitized by PARP inhibitor.PARP inhibitor with RT enhances NKG2D ligand expression and NK cell-mediated lysis.NK cells are required for the therapeutic efficacy of PARP inhibitor and RT.

Importance of the Study

Radiotherapy is the cornerstone of H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma treatment, but almost all patients succumb to tumor recurrence with poor overall survival, underscoring the need for RT-based precision combination therapy. Here, we reveal HRR deficiency as an H3K27M-mediated vulnerability and identify a novel mechanism linking impaired RT-induced histone H1 polyubiquitination and the subsequent RNF168/BRCA1/RAD51 recruitment in H3K27M DMG. This model is supported by selective radiosensitization of H3K27M DMG by PARP inhibitor. Notably, the combination treatment results in NKG2D ligand expression that confers susceptibility to NK cell killing in H3K27M DMG. We also show that the novel brain penetrant, PARP1-selective inhibitor AZD9574 compares favorably to olaparib when combined with RT, prolonging survival in a syngeneic orthotopic model of H3K27M DMG. This study highlights the ability of PARP1 inhibition to radiosensitize and induce an NK cell-mediated antitumor immunity in H3K27M DMG and supports future clinical investigation.

DOT1L-mediated RAP80 methylation promotes BRCA1 recruitment to elicit DNA repair

Breast Cancer Type 1 Susceptibility Protein (BRCA1) is a tumor-suppressor protein that regulates various cellular pathways, including those that are essential for preserving genome stability. One essential mechanism involves a BRCA1-A complex that is recruited to double-strand breaks (DSBs) by RAP80 before initiating DNA damage repair (DDR). How RAP80 itself is recruited to DNA damage sites, however, is unclear. Here, we demonstrate an intrinsic correlation between a methyltransferase DOT1L-mediated RAP80 methylation and BRCA1-A complex chromatin recruitment that occurs during cancer cell radiotherapy resistance. Mechanistically, DOT1L is quickly recruited onto chromatin and methylates RAP80 at multiple lysines in response to DNA damage. Methylated RAP80 is then indispensable for binding to ubiquitinated H2A and subsequently triggering BRCA1-A complex recruitment onto DSBs. Importantly, DOT1L-catalyzed RAP80 methylation and recruitment of BRCA1 have clinical relevance, as inhibition of DOT1L or RAP80 methylation seems to enhance the radiosensitivity of cancer cells both in vivo and in vitro. These data reveal a crucial role for DOT1L in DDR through initiating recruitment of RAP80 and BRCA1 onto chromatin and underscore a therapeutic strategy based on targeting DOT1L to overcome tumor radiotherapy resistance.

Involvement of the splicing factor SART1 in the BRCA1-dependent homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks

Although previous studies have reported that pre-mRNA splicing factors (SFs) are involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) via homologous recombination (HR), their exact role in promoting HR remains poorly understood. Here, we showed that SART1, an SF upregulated in several types of cancer, promotes DSB end resection, an essential first step of HR. The resection-promoting function of SART1 requires phosphorylation at threonine 430 and 695 by ATM/ATR. SART1 is recruited to DSB sites in a manner dependent on transcription and its RS domain. SART1 is epistatic with BRCA1, a major HR factor, in the promotion of resection, especially transcription-associated resection in the G2 phase. SART1 and BRCA1 accumulate at DSB sites in an interdependent manner, and epistatically counteract the resection blockade posed by 53BP1 and RIF1. Furthermore, chromosome analysis demonstrated that SART1 and BRCA1 epistatically suppressed genomic alterations caused by DSB misrepair in the G2 phase. Collectively, these results indicate that SART1 and BRCA1 cooperatively facilitate resection of DSBs arising in transcriptionally active genomic regions in the G2 phase, thereby promoting faithful repair by HR, and suppressing genome instability.

E3 ligases: a ubiquitous link between DNA repair, DNA replication and human disease

Maintenance of genome stability is of paramount importance for the survival of an organism. However, genomic integrity is constantly being challenged by various endogenous and exogenous processes that damage DNA. Therefore, cells are heavily reliant on DNA repair pathways that have evolved to deal with every type of genotoxic insult that threatens to compromise genome stability. Notably, inherited mutations in genes encoding proteins involved in these protective pathways trigger the onset of disease that is driven by chromosome instability e.g. neurodevelopmental abnormalities, neurodegeneration, premature ageing, immunodeficiency and cancer development. The ability of cells to regulate the recruitment of specific DNA repair proteins to sites of DNA damage is extremely complex but is primarily mediated by protein post-translational modifications (PTMs). Ubiquitylation is one such PTM, which controls genome stability by regulating protein localisation, protein turnover, protein-protein interactions and intra-cellular signalling. Over the past two decades, numerous ubiquitin (Ub) E3 ligases have been identified to play a crucial role not only in the initiation of DNA replication and DNA damage repair but also in the efficient termination of these processes. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of how different Ub E3 ligases (RNF168, TRAIP, HUWE1, TRIP12, FANCL, BRCA1, RFWD3) function to regulate DNA repair and replication and the pathological consequences arising from inheriting deleterious mutations that compromise the Ub-dependent DNA damage response.

Widespread chromatin context-dependencies of DNA double-strand break repair proteins

DNA double-strand breaks are repaired by multiple pathways, including non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). The balance of these pathways is dependent on the local chromatin context, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. By combining knockout screening with a dual MMEJ:NHEJ reporter inserted in 19 different chromatin environments, we identified dozens of DNA repair proteins that modulate pathway balance dependent on the local chromatin state. Proteins that favor NHEJ mostly synergize with euchromatin, while proteins that favor MMEJ generally synergize with distinct types of heterochromatin. Examples of the former are BRCA2 and POLL, and of the latter the FANC complex and ATM. Moreover, in a diversity of human cancer types, loss of several of these proteins alters the distribution of pathway-specific mutations between heterochromatin and euchromatin. Together, these results uncover a complex network of proteins that regulate MMEJ:NHEJ balance in a chromatin context-dependent manner.

RAP80 phase separation at DNA double-strand break promotes BRCA1 recruitment

RAP80 has been characterized as a component of the BRCA1-A complex and is responsible for the recruitment of BRCA1 to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, we and others found that the recruitment of RAP80 and BRCA1 were not absolutely temporally synchronized, indicating that other mechanisms, apart from physical interaction, might be implicated. Recently, liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) has been characterized as a novel mechanism for the organization of key signaling molecules to drive their particular cellular functions. Here, we characterized that RAP80 LLPS at DSB was required for RAP80-mediated BRCA1 recruitment. Both cellular and in vitro experiments showed that RAP80 phase separated at DSB, which was ascribed to a highly disordered region (IDR) at its N-terminal. Meanwhile, the Lys63-linked poly-ubiquitin chains that quickly formed after DSBs occur, strongly enhanced RAP80 phase separation and were responsible for the induction of RAP80 condensation at the DSB site. Most importantly, abolishing the condensation of RAP80 significantly suppressed the formation of BRCA1 foci, encovering a pivotal role of RAP80 condensates in BRCA1 recruitment and radiosensitivity. Together, our study disclosed a new mechanism underlying RAP80-mediated BRCA1 recruitment, which provided new insight into the role of phase separation in DSB repair.

New Facets of DNA Double Strand Break Repair: Radiation Dose as Key Determinant of HR versus c-NHEJ Engagement

Radiation therapy is an essential component of present-day cancer management, utilizing ionizing radiation (IR) of different modalities to mitigate cancer progression. IR functions by generating ionizations in cells that induce a plethora of DNA lesions. The most detrimental among them are the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). In the course of evolution, cells of higher eukaryotes have evolved four major DSB repair pathways: classical non-homologous end joining (c-NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), alternative end-joining (alt-EJ), and single strand annealing (SSA). These mechanistically distinct repair pathways have different cell cycle- and homology-dependencies but, surprisingly, they operate with widely different fidelity and kinetics and therefore contribute unequally to cell survival and genome maintenance. It is therefore reasonable to anticipate tight regulation and coordination in the engagement of these DSB repair pathway to achieve the maximum possible genomic stability. Here, we provide a state-of-the-art review of the accumulated knowledge on the molecular mechanisms underpinning these repair pathways, with emphasis on c-NHEJ and HR. We discuss factors and processes that have recently come to the fore. We outline mechanisms steering DSB repair pathway choice throughout the cell cycle, and highlight the critical role of DNA end resection in this process. Most importantly, however, we point out the strong preference for HR at low DSB loads, and thus low IR doses, for cells irradiated in the G2-phase of the cell cycle. We further explore the molecular underpinnings of transitions from high fidelity to low fidelity error-prone repair pathways and analyze the coordination and consequences of this transition on cell viability and genomic stability. Finally, we elaborate on how these advances may help in the development of improved cancer treatment protocols in radiation therapy.

Pharmacological Ascorbate Elicits Anti-Cancer Activities against Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer through Hydrogen-Peroxide-Induced-DNA-Damage

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) poses a significant global health burden with unsatisfactory survival rates, despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Novel therapeutic approaches are urgently required to improve patient outcomes. Pharmacological ascorbate (P-AscH-; ascorbate at millimolar concentration in plasma) emerged as a potential candidate for cancer therapy for recent decades. In this present study, we explore the anti-cancer effects of P-AscH- on NSCLC and elucidate its underlying mechanisms. P-AscH- treatment induces formation of cellular oxidative distress; disrupts cellular bioenergetics; and leads to induction of apoptotic cell death and ultimately reduction in clonogenic survival. Remarkably, DNA and DNA damage response machineries are identified as vulnerable targets for P-AscH- in NSCLC therapy. Treatments with P-AscH- increase the formation of DNA damage and replication stress markers while inducing mislocalization of DNA repair machineries. The cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of P-AscH- on NSCLC were reversed by co-treatment with catalase, highlighting the roles of extracellular hydrogen peroxide in anti-cancer activities of P-AscH-. The data from this current research advance our understanding of P-AscH- in cancer treatment and support its potential clinical use as a therapeutic option for NSCLC therapy.

Mapping the Genetic Interaction Network of PARP inhibitor Response

Genetic interactions have long informed our understanding of the coordinated proteins and pathways that respond to DNA damage in mammalian cells, but systematic interrogation of the genetic network underlying that system has yet to be achieved. Towards this goal, we measured 147,153 pairwise interactions among genes implicated in PARP inhibitor (PARPi) response. Evaluating genetic interactions at this scale, with and without exposure to PARPi, revealed hierarchical organization of the pathways and complexes that maintain genome stability during normal growth and defined changes that occur upon accumulation of DNA lesions due to cytotoxic doses of PARPi. We uncovered unexpected relationships among DNA repair genes, including context-specific buffering interactions between the minimally characterized AUNIP and BRCA1-A complex genes. Our work thus establishes a foundation for mapping differential genetic interactions in mammalian cells and provides a comprehensive resource for future studies of DNA repair and PARP inhibitors.

WWOX binds MERIT40 and modulates its function in homologous recombination, implications in breast cancer

The tumor suppressor gene WWOX is localized in an unstable chromosomal region and its expression is decreased or absent in several types of cancer. A low expression of WWOX is associated with a poor prognosis in breast cancer (BC). It has recently been shown that WWOX contributes to genome stability through its role in the DNA damage response (DDR). In breast cancer cells, WWOX inhibits homologous recombination (HR), and thus promotes the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The fine-tuning modulation of HR activity is crucial. Its under or overstimulation inducing genome alterations that can induce cancer. MERIT40 is a positive regulator of the DDR. This protein is indispensable for the function of the multi-protein complex BRCA1-A, which suppresses excessive HR activity. MERIT40 also recruits Tankyrase, a positive regulator of HR, to the DSBs to stimulate DNA repair. Here, we identified MERIT40 as a new molecular partner of WWOX. We demonstrated that WWOX inhibited excessive HR activity induced by overexpression of MERIT40. We showed that WWOX impaired the MERIT40-Tankyrase interaction preventing the role of the complex on DSBs. Furthermore, we found that MERIT40 is overexpressed in BC and that this overexpression is associated to a poor prognosis. These results strongly suggest that WWOX, through its interaction with MERIT40, prevents the deleterious impact of excessive HR on BC development by inhibiting MERIT40-Tankyrase association. This inhibitory effect of WWOX would oppose MERIT40-dependent BC development.

ABRAXAS1 orchestrates BRCA1 activities to counter genome destabilizing repair pathways-lessons from breast cancer patients

It has been well-established that mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, compromising functions in DNA double-strand break repair (DSBR), confer hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk. Importantly, mutations in these genes explain only a minor fraction of the hereditary risk and of the subset of DSBR deficient tumors. Our screening efforts identified two truncating germline mutations in the gene encoding the BRCA1 complex partner ABRAXAS1 in German early-onset breast cancer patients. To unravel the molecular mechanisms triggering carcinogenesis in these carriers of heterozygous mutations, we examined DSBR functions in patient-derived lymphoblastoid cells (LCLs) and in genetically manipulated mammary epithelial cells. By use of these strategies we were able to demonstrate that these truncating ABRAXAS1 mutations exerted dominant effects on BRCA1 functions. Interestingly, we did not observe haploinsufficiency regarding homologous recombination (HR) proficiency (reporter assay, RAD51-foci, PARP-inhibitor sensitivity) in mutation carriers. However, the balance was shifted to use of mutagenic DSBR-pathways. The dominant effect of truncated ABRAXAS1 devoid of the C-terminal BRCA1 binding site can be explained by retention of the N-terminal interaction sites for other BRCA1-A complex partners like RAP80. In this case BRCA1 was channeled from the BRCA1-A to the BRCA1-C complex, which induced single-strand annealing (SSA). Further truncation, additionally deleting the coiled-coil region of ABRAXAS1, unleashed excessive DNA damage responses (DDRs) de-repressing multiple DSBR-pathways including SSA and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Our data reveal de-repression of low-fidelity repair activities as a common feature of cells from patients with heterozygous mutations in genes encoding BRCA1 and its complex partners.

USP7 - a crucial regulator of cancer hallmarks

Over the course of three decades of study, the deubiquitinase Herpesvirus associated Ubiquitin-Specific Protease/Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 7 (HAUSP/USP7) has gradually come to be recognized as a crucially important molecule in cellular physiology. The fact that USP7 is overexpressed in a number of cancers, including breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancers, supports the idea that USP7 is also an important regulator of tumorigenesis. In this review, we discuss USP7's function in relation to the cancer hallmarks described by Hanahan and Weinberg. This post-translational modifier can support increased proliferation, block unfavorable growth signals, stop cell death, and support an unstable cellular genome by manipulating key players in the pertinent signalling circuit. It is interesting to note that USP7 also aids in the stabilization of molecules that support angiogenesis and metastasis. Targeting USP7 has now emerged as a crucial component of USP7 research because pharmacological inhibition of USP7 supports p53-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Efficacious USP7 inhibition is currently being investigated in both synthetic and natural compounds, but issues with selectivity and a lack of co-crystal structure have hindered USP7 inhibition from being tested in clinical settings. Moreover, the development of new, more effective USP7 inhibitors and their encouraging implications by numerous groups give us a glimmer of hope for USP7-targeting medications as effective substitutes for hazardous cancer chemotherapeutics.

Cellular Functions of Deubiquitinating Enzymes in Ovarian Adenocarcinoma

In ovarian cancer patients, the 5-year survival rate is 90% for stages I and II, but only 30% for stages III and IV. Unfortunately, as 75% of the patients are diagnosed at stages III and IV, many experience a recurrence. To ameliorate this, it is necessary to develop new biomarkers for early diagnosis and treatment. The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a post-translational modification that plays an important role in regulating protein stability through ubiquitination. In particular, deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) regulate protein stability through deubiquitinating substrate proteins. In this review, DUBs and substrates regulated by these enzymes are summarized based on their functions in ovarian cancer cells. This would be useful for the discovery of biomarkers for ovarian cancer and developing new therapeutic candidates.

BRCA1-Dependent and Independent Recruitment of PALB2-BRCA2-RAD51 in the DNA Damage Response and Cancer

The BRCA1-PALB2-BRCA2 axis plays essential roles in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), maintenance of genome integrity, and suppression of cancer development. Upon DNA damage, BRCA1 is recruited to DSBs, where it facilitates end resection and recruits PALB2 and its associated BRCA2 to load the central recombination enzyme RAD51 to initiate homologous recombination (HR) repair. In recent years, several BRCA1-independent mechanisms of PALB2 recruitment have also been reported. Collectively, these available data illustrate a series of hierarchical, context-dependent, and cooperating mechanisms of PALB2 recruitment that is critical for HR and therapy response either in the presence or absence of BRCA1. Here, we review these BRCA1-dependent and independent mechanisms and their importance in DSB repair, cancer development, and therapy. As BRCA1-mutant cancer cells regain HR function, for which PALB2 is generally required, and become resistant to targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors, targeting BRCA1-independent mechanisms of PALB2 recruitment represents a potential new avenue to improve treatment of BRCA1-mutant tumors.

Autologous K63 deubiquitylation within the BRCA1-A complex licenses DNA damage recognition

The BRCA1-A complex contains matching lysine-63 ubiquitin (K63-Ub) binding and deubiquitylating activities. How these functionalities are coordinated to effectively respond to DNA damage remains unknown. We generated Brcc36 deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) inactive mice to address this gap in knowledge in a physiologic system. DUB inactivation impaired BRCA1-A complex damage localization and repair activities while causing early lethality when combined with Brca2 mutation. Damage response dysfunction in DUB-inactive cells corresponded to increased K63-Ub on RAP80 and BRCC36. Chemical cross-linking coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analyses of isolated BRCA1-A complexes demonstrated the RAP80 ubiquitin interaction motifs are occupied by ubiquitin exclusively in the DUB-inactive complex, linking auto-inhibition by internal K63-Ub chains to loss of damage site ubiquitin recognition. These findings identify RAP80 and BRCC36 as autologous DUB substrates in the BRCA1-A complex, thus explaining the evolution of matching ubiquitin-binding and hydrolysis activities within a single macromolecular assembly.

DNA Damage Response Regulation by Histone Ubiquitination

Cells are constantly exposed to numerous genotoxic stresses that induce DNA damage. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most serious damages and should be systematically repaired to preserve genomic integrity. The efficiency of repair is closely associated with chromatin structure, which is regulated by posttranslational modifications of histones, including ubiquitination. Recent evidence shows crosstalk between histone ubiquitination and DNA damage responses, suggesting an integrated model for the systematic regulation of DNA repair. There are two major pathways for DSB repair, viz., nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination, and the choice of the pathway is partially controlled by posttranslational modifications of histones, including ubiquitination. Histone ubiquitination changes chromatin structure in the vicinity of DSBs and serves as a platform to select and recruit repair proteins; the removal of these modifications by deubiquitinating enzymes suppresses the recruitment of repair proteins and promotes the convergence of repair reactions. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the DNA damage response regulated by histone ubiquitination in response to DSBs.

The regulation of DNA end resection by chromatin response to DNA double strand breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) constantly arise upon exposure to genotoxic agents and during physiological processes. The timely repair of DSBs is important for not only the completion of the cellular functions involving DSBs as intermediates, but also the maintenance of genome stability. There are two major pathways dedicated to DSB repair: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The decision of deploying HR or NHEJ to repair DSBs largely depends on the structures of broken DNA ends. DNA ends resected to generate extensive single-strand DNA (ssDNA) overhangs are repaired by HR, while those remaining blunt or minimally processed can be repaired by NHEJ. As the generation and repair of DSB occurs within the context of chromatin, the resection of broken DNA ends is also profoundly affected by the state of chromatin flanking DSBs. Here we review how DNA end resection can be regulated by histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and the presence of ssDNA structure through altering the accessibility to chromatin and the activity of pro- and anti-resection proteins.

The Chromatin Landscape Channels DNA Double-Strand Breaks to Distinct Repair Pathways

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the most deleterious DNA lesions, are primarily repaired by two pathways, namely homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), the choice of which is largely dependent on cell cycle phase and the local chromatin landscape. Recent studies have revealed that post-translational modifications on histones play pivotal roles in regulating DSB repair pathways including repair pathway choice. In this review, we present our current understanding of how these DSB repair pathways are employed in various chromatin landscapes to safeguard genomic integrity. We place an emphasis on the impact of different histone post-translational modifications, characteristic of euchromatin or heterochromatin regions, on DSB repair pathway choice. We discuss the potential roles of damage-induced chromatin modifications in the maintenance of genome and epigenome integrity. Finally, we discuss how RNA transcripts from the vicinity of DSBs at actively transcribed regions also regulate DSB repair pathway choice.

New answers to the old RIDDLE: RNF168 and the DNA damage response pathway

The chromatin-based DNA damage response pathway is tightly orchestrated by histone post-translational modifications, including histone H2A ubiquitination. Ubiquitination plays an integral role in regulating cellular processes including DNA damage signaling and repair. The ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF168 is essential in assembling a cohort of DNA repair proteins at the damaged chromatin via its enzymatic activity. RNF168 ubiquitinates histone H2A(X) at the N terminus and generates a specific docking scaffold for ubiquitin-binding motif-containing proteins. The regulation of RNF168 at damaged chromatin and the mechanistic implication in the recruitment of DNA repair proteins to the damaged sites remain an area of active investigation. Here, we review the function and regulation of RNF168 in the context of ubiquitin-mediated DNA damage signaling and repair. We will also discuss the unanswered questions that require further investigation and how understanding RNF168 targeting specificity could benefit the therapeutic development for cancer treatment.

RAP80 suppresses the vulnerability of R-loops during DNA double-strand break repair

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) arising as an intermediate of cellular processes on DNA is a potential vulnerability of the genome unless it is appropriately protected. Recent evidence suggests that R-loops, consisting of ssDNA and DNA-RNA hybrids, can form in the proximity of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) within transcriptionally active regions. However, how the vulnerability of ssDNA in R-loops is overcome during DSB repair remains unclear. Here, we identify RAP80 as a factor suppressing the vulnerability of ssDNA in R-loops, chromosome translocations, and deletions during DSB repair. Mechanistically, RAP80 prevents unscheduled nucleolytic processing of ssDNA in R-loops by CtIP. This mechanism promotes efficient DSB repair via transcription-associated end joining dependent on BRCA1, Polθ, and LIG1/3. Thus, RAP80 suppresses the vulnerability of R-loops during DSB repair, thereby precluding genomic abnormalities in a critical component of the genome caused by deleterious R-loop processing.

Immediate-Early, Early, and Late Responses to DNA Double Stranded Breaks

Loss or rearrangement of genetic information can result from incorrect responses to DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). The cellular responses to DSBs encompass a range of highly coordinated events designed to detect and respond appropriately to the damage, thereby preserving genomic integrity. In analogy with events occurring during viral infection, we appropriate the terms Immediate-Early, Early, and Late to describe the pre-repair responses to DSBs. A distinguishing feature of the Immediate-Early response is that the large protein condensates that form during the Early and Late response and are resolved upon repair, termed foci, are not visible. The Immediate-Early response encompasses initial lesion sensing, involving poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), KU70/80, and MRN, as well as rapid repair by so-called ‘fast-kinetic’ canonical non-homologous end joining (cNHEJ). Initial binding of PARPs and the KU70/80 complex to breaks appears to be mutually exclusive at easily ligatable DSBs that are repaired efficiently by fast-kinetic cNHEJ; a process that is PARP-, ATM-, 53BP1-, Artemis-, and resection-independent. However, at more complex breaks requiring processing, the Immediate-Early response involving PARPs and the ensuing highly dynamic PARylation (polyADP ribosylation) of many substrates may aid recruitment of both KU70/80 and MRN to DSBs. Complex DSBs rely upon the Early response, largely defined by ATM-dependent focal recruitment of many signalling molecules into large condensates, and regulated by complex chromatin dynamics. Finally, the Late response integrates information from cell cycle phase, chromatin context, and type of DSB to determine appropriate pathway choice. Critical to pathway choice is the recruitment of p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) and breast cancer associated 1 (BRCA1). However, additional factors recruited throughout the DSB response also impact upon pathway choice, although these remain to be fully characterised. The Late response somehow channels DSBs into the appropriate high-fidelity repair pathway, typically either ‘slow-kinetic’ cNHEJ or homologous recombination (HR). Loss of specific components of the DSB repair machinery results in cells utilising remaining factors to effect repair, but often at the cost of increased mutagenesis. Here we discuss the complex regulation of the Immediate-Early, Early, and Late responses to DSBs proceeding repair itself.

Proline-serine-threonine-repeat region of MDC1 mediates Chk1 phosphorylation and the DNA double-strand break repair

MDC1, a mediator of DNA damage response, recruits other repair proteins on double-strand break (DSB) sites. MDC1 is necessary for activating checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2. It is unclear whether Chk1 interacts with MDC1. MDC1 also comprises many discrete domains. The role of the proline-serine-threonine (PST)-repeat domain of MDC1 in the DNA damage response is unclear. Here, we showed that MDC1 directly binds Chk1 through this PST-repeat region. Phosphorylation of Chk1 by ionizing radiation (IR) also required this PST-repeat domain. Degradation of intact MDC1 was accelerated depending on the PST-repeat domain after IR exposure. In the IR damage response, the PST-repeat-deleted MDC1 levels remained elevated with slow degradation. This abnormal regulation of MDC1 was F-box- and WD40 repeat-containing 7 (FBXW7)-dependent. The mutation of lysine 1413 within the PST-repeat of MDC1 deregulated MDC1 with or without damage. K1413R mutant and PST-deleted MDC1 displayed reduced ability to repair the damaged genome post-IR exposure. These results provide that the PST domain of MDC1 is involved in Chk1 and DNA repair activation. The findings suggest new insights into how MDC1 connects the checkpoint and DNA repair in the DNA damage response.

Roles of the SUMO-related enzymes, PIAS1, PIAS4, and RNF4, in DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination

Post-translational modification of proteins by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) is known to be involved in a variety of cellular events. This modification, called SUMOylation, is carried out by the E1 activating enzyme, the E2 conjugating enzyme, and multiple E3 ligases. Previous studies have demonstrated that the SUMO E3 ligases, protein inhibitors of activated STAT 1 (PIAS1) and 4 (PIAS4), and the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase, RING finger protein 4 (RNF4), play important roles in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, the mechanism by which these SUMO-related enzymes promote DSB repair is still poorly understood. In the present study, we focused on homologous recombination (HR), the most accurate DSB repair pathway, and aimed to elucidate the mechanism by which PIAS1, PIAS4, and RNF4 promote HR. In γ-ray-irradiated normal human fibroblasts, DSB end resection and RAD51 loading, the two essential steps of HR, were significantly impaired by small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of PIAS1, PIAS4, or RNF4. The recruitment of BRCA1, a major HR factor, to DSB sites was reduced in cells depleted of these SUMO-related enzymes. Consistent with the role of BRCA1 in counteracting the p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1)-mediated resection blockade, 53BP1 depletion rescued the reduced resection and RAD51 loading in the cells depleted of PIAS1, PIAS4, or RNF4. Moreover, Rap1-interacting factor 1 (RIF1), a resection inhibitor downstream of 53BP1, became more abundant at DSBs when PIAS1, PIAS4, RNF4, or BRCA1 was depleted. Importantly, the concomitant depletion of BRCA1 with either one of the SUMO-related enzymes did not further increase RIF1 at DSBs, when compared to single depletion of BRCA1. Collectively, these results suggest that PIAS1, PIAS4, RNF4, and BRCA1 work epistatically to counteract 53BP1/RIF1-mediated resection blockade, thereby promoting resection.

Interaction of Wwox with Brca1 and associated complex proteins prevents premature resection at double-strand breaks and aberrant homologous recombination

Down regulation of Wwox protein expression occurs in many cancers, contributing to insensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR) and platinum drug treatments. Patients with reduced Wwox expression in their cancer tissue show decreased overall survival following these treatments, in accord with our earlier finding that reduced Wwox protein expression in cancers is associated with changes in choice of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway. Our current investigation of mechanisms underlying the initial choice of repair by homologous recombination/single-strand annealing (HR/SSA) in Wwox-deficient cells, showed immediate DNA end-resection at DSBs following IR, abrogating initial repair by the expected non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. Mechanisms supporting the expected choice of DSB repair by NHEJ in Wwox-sufficient cells are: 1) direct recruitment of Wwox protein binding to Brca1 through the Brca1 ⁹⁸¹PPLF⁹⁸⁴ Wwox-binding motif; 2) possible Wwox blocking of Brca1-Rad50 interaction and of Brca1 activation by Chk2 phosphorylation of Brca1 S988; 3) Wwox suppression of Brca1 interaction with the B and C complex proteins, Brip1 and CtIP, thereby delaying the process of DSB end-resection post-IR. Wwox deficiency, instead, leads to early formation of the Brca1-CtIP/MRN complex at induced DSBs, stimulating immediate post-IR end-resection. This premature resection at DNA DSBs leads to inappropriate HR/SSA repair not restricted to late S/G2 cell cycle phases, and increases mutations in genomes of radiation or platinum-resistant colonies. Prevention of premature initiation of end-resection, by combining Chk2 inhibition with IR or carboplatin treatment, successfully sensitized IR and platinum-resistant Wwox-deficient cells by synthetic lethality, but did not alter response of Wwox-sufficient cells. Our results establish Wwox as a biomarker for treatment response and provide potential targets, such as Chk2, for reversal of treatment resistance.

Two redundant ubiquitin-dependent pathways of BRCA1 localization to DNA damage sites

The tumor suppressor BRCA1 accumulates at sites of DNA damage in a ubiquitin‐dependent manner. In this work, we revisit the role of RAP80 in promoting BRCA1 recruitment to damaged chromatin. We find that RAP80 acts redundantly with the BRCA1 RING domain to promote BRCA1 recruitment to DNA damage sites. We show that that RNF8 E3 ligase acts upstream of both the RAP80‐ and RING‐dependent activities, whereas RNF168 acts uniquely upstream of the RING domain. BRCA1 RING mutations that do not impact BARD1 interaction, such as the E2 binding‐deficient I26A mutation, render BRCA1 unable to accumulate at DNA damage sites in the absence of RAP80. Cells that combine BRCA1 I26A and mutations that disable the RAP80–BRCA1 interaction are hypersensitive to PARP inhibition and are unable to form RAD51 foci. Our results suggest that in the absence of RAP80, the BRCA1 E3 ligase activity is necessary for recognition of histone H2A Lys13/Lys15 ubiquitylation by BARD1, although we cannot rule out the possibility that the BRCA1 RING facilitates ubiquitylated nucleosome recognition in other ways.

Histone lysine modifying enzymes and their critical roles in DNA double-strand break repair

Cells protect the integrity of the genome against DNA double-strand breaks through several well-characterized mechanisms including nonhomologous end-joining repair, homologous recombination repair, microhomology-mediated end-joining and single-strand annealing. However, aberrant DNA damage responses (DDRs) lead to genome instability and tumorigenesis. Clarification of the mechanisms underlying the DDR following lethal damage will facilitate the identification of therapeutic targets for cancer. Histones are small proteins that play a major role in condensing DNA into chromatin and regulating gene function. Histone modifications commonly occur in several residues including lysine, arginine, serine, threonine and tyrosine, which can be acetylated, methylated, ubiquitinated and phosphorylated. Of these, lysine modifications have been extensively explored during DDRs. Here, we focus on discussing the roles of lysine modifying enzymes involved in acetylation, methylation, and ubiquitination during the DDR. We provide a comprehensive understanding of the basis of potential epigenetic therapies driven by histone lysine modifications.

Making Connections: Integrative Signaling Mechanisms Coordinate DNA Break Repair in Chromatin

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are hazardous to genome integrity and can promote mutations and disease if not handled correctly. Cells respond to these dangers by engaging DNA damage response (DDR) pathways that are able to identify DNA breaks within chromatin leading ultimately to their repair. The recognition and repair of DSBs by the DDR is largely dependent on the ability of DNA damage sensing factors to bind to and interact with nucleic acids, nucleosomes and their modified forms to target these activities to the break site. These contacts orientate and localize factors to lesions within chromatin, allowing signaling and faithful repair of the break to occur. Coordinating these events requires the integration of several signaling and binding events. Studies are revealing an enormously complex array of interactions that contribute to DNA lesion recognition and repair including binding events on DNA, as well as RNA, RNA:DNA hybrids, nucleosomes, histone and non-histone protein post-translational modifications and protein-protein interactions. Here we examine several DDR pathways that highlight and provide prime examples of these emerging concepts. A combination of approaches including genetic, cellular, and structural biology have begun to reveal new insights into the molecular interactions that govern the DDR within chromatin. While many questions remain, a clearer picture has started to emerge for how DNA-templated processes including transcription, replication and DSB repair are coordinated. Multivalent interactions with several biomolecules serve as key signals to recruit and orientate proteins at DNA lesions, which is essential to integrate signaling events and coordinate the DDR within the milieu of the nucleus where competing genome functions take place. Genome architecture, chromatin structure and phase separation have emerged as additional vital regulatory mechanisms that also influence genome integrity pathways including DSB repair. Collectively, recent advancements in the field have not only provided a deeper understanding of these fundamental processes that maintain genome integrity and cellular homeostasis but have also started to identify new strategies to target deficiencies in these pathways that are prevalent in human diseases including cancer.

RNF168-mediated localization of BARD1 recruits the BRCA1-PALB2 complex to DNA damage

DNA damage prompts a diverse range of alterations to the chromatin landscape. The RNF168 E3 ubiquitin ligase catalyzes the mono-ubiquitination of histone H2A at lysine (K)13/15 (mUb-H2A), forming a binding module for DNA repair proteins. BRCA1 promotes homologous recombination (HR), in part, through its interaction with PALB2, and the formation of a larger BRCA1-PALB2-BRCA2-RAD51 (BRCA1-P) complex. The mechanism by which BRCA1-P is recruited to chromatin surrounding DNA breaks is unclear. In this study, we reveal that an RNF168-governed signaling pathway is responsible for localizing the BRCA1-P complex to DNA damage. Using mice harboring a Brca1^CC (coiled coil) mutation that blocks the Brca1-Palb2 interaction, we uncovered an epistatic relationship between Rnf168⁻ and Brca1^CC alleles, which disrupted development, and reduced the efficiency of Palb2-Rad51 localization. Mechanistically, we show that RNF168-generated mUb-H2A recruits BARD1 through a BRCT domain ubiquitin-dependent recruitment motif (BUDR). Subsequently, BARD1-BRCA1 accumulate PALB2-RAD51 at DNA breaks via the CC domain-mediated BRCA1-PALB2 interaction. Together, these findings establish a series of molecular interactions that connect the DNA damage signaling and HR repair machinery.

The BRCA1-PALB2-BRCA2-RAD51 (BRCA1-P) complex is well known to play a fundamental role in DNA repair, but how the complex recruitment is regulated is still a matter of interest. Here the authors reveal mechanistic insights into RNF168 activity being responsible for PALB2 recruitment, through BARD1-BRCA1 during homologous recombination repair.

BARD1 reads H2A lysine 15 ubiquitination to direct homologous recombination

Protein ubiquitination at sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by RNF168 recruits BRCA1 and 53BP11,2, which are mediators of the homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining DSB repair pathways, respectively3. Non-homologous end joining relies on 53BP1 binding directly to ubiquitinated lysine 15 on H2A-type histones (H2AK15ub)4,5 (which is an RNF168-dependent modification6), but how RNF168 promotes BRCA1 recruitment and function remains unclear. Here we identify a tandem BRCT-domain-associated ubiquitin-dependent recruitment motif (BUDR) in BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1) (the obligate partner protein of BRCA1) that, by engaging H2AK15ub, recruits BRCA1 to DSBs. Disruption of the BUDR of BARD1 compromises homologous recombination and renders cells hypersensitive to PARP inhibition and cisplatin. We further show that BARD1 binds nucleosomes through multivalent interactions: coordinated binding of H2AK15ub and unmethylated H4 lysine 20 by its adjacent BUDR and ankyrin repeat domains, respectively, provides high-affinity recognition of DNA lesions in replicated chromatin and promotes the homologous recombination activities of the BRCA1-BARD1 complex. Finally, our genetic epistasis experiments confirm that the need for BARD1 chromatin-binding activities can be entirely relieved upon deletion of RNF168 or 53BP1. Thus, our results demonstrate that by sensing DNA-damage-dependent and post-replication histone post-translation modification states, BRCA1-BARD1 complexes coordinate the antagonization of the 53BP1 pathway with promotion of homologous recombination, establishing a simple paradigm for the governance of the choice of DSB repair pathway.

Mechanisms of BRCA1-BARD1 nucleosome recognition and ubiquitylation

The BRCA1-BARD1 tumour suppressor is an E3 ubiquitin ligase necessary for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination^1-10. The BRCA1-BARD1 complex localizes to damaged chromatin after DNA replication and catalyses the ubiquitylation of histone H2A and other cellular targets^11-14. The molecular bases for the recruitment to double-strand breaks and target recognition of BRCA1-BARD1 remain unknown. Here we use cryo-electron microscopy to show that the ankyrin repeat and tandem BRCT domains in BARD1 adopt a compact fold and bind to nucleosomal histones, DNA and monoubiquitin attached to H2A amino-terminal K13 or K15, two signals known to be specific for double-strand breaks^15,16. We further show that RING domains¹⁷ in BRCA1-BARD1 orient an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme atop the nucleosome in a dynamic conformation, primed for ubiquitin transfer to the flexible carboxy-terminal tails of H2A and variant H2AX. Our work reveals a regulatory crosstalk in which recognition of monoubiquitin by BRCA1-BARD1 at the N terminus of H2A blocks the formation of polyubiquitin chains and cooperatively promotes ubiquitylation at the C terminus of H2A. These findings elucidate the mechanisms of BRCA1-BARD1 chromatin recruitment and ubiquitylation specificity, highlight key functions of BARD1 in both processes and explain how BRCA1-BARD1 promotes homologous recombination by opposing the DNA repair protein 53BP1 in post-replicative chromatin^18-22. These data provide a structural framework to evaluate BARD1 variants and help to identify mutations that drive the development of cancer.

Genetic vulnerabilities upon inhibition of DNA damage response

Because of essential roles of DNA damage response (DDR) in the maintenance of genomic integrity, cellular homeostasis, and tumor suppression, targeting DDR has become a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. However, the benefits of cancer therapy targeting DDR are limited mainly due to the lack of predictive biomarkers. To address this challenge, we performed CRISPR screens to search for genetic vulnerabilities that affect cells’ response to DDR inhibition. By undertaking CRISPR screens with inhibitors targeting key DDR mediators, i.e. ATR, ATM, DNAPK and CHK1, we obtained a global and unbiased view of genetic interactions with DDR inhibition. Specifically, we identified YWHAE loss as a key determinant of sensitivity to CHK1 inhibition. We showed that KLHL15 loss protects cells from DNA damage induced by ATM inhibition. Moreover, we validated that APEX1 loss sensitizes cells to DNAPK inhibition. Additionally, we compared the synergistic effects of combining different DDR inhibitors and found that an ATM inhibitor plus a PARP inhibitor induced dramatic levels of cell death, probably through promoting apoptosis. Our results enhance the understanding of DDR pathways and will facilitate the use of DDR-targeting agents in cancer therapy.

Homologous recombination is reduced in female embryonic stem cells by two active X chromosomes

The reactivation of X-linked genes is observed in some primary breast tumors. Two active X chromosomes are also observed in female embryonic stem cells (ESCs), but whether double doses of X-linked genes affect DNA repair efficiency remains unclear. Here, we establish isogenic female/male ESCs and show that the female ESCs are more sensitive to camptothecin and have lower gene targeting efficiency than male ESCs, suggesting that homologous recombination (HR) efficiency is reduced in female ESCs. We also generate Xist-inducible female ESCs and show that the lower HR efficiency is restored when X chromosome inactivation is induced. Finally, we assess the X-linked genes with a role in DNA repair and find that Brcc3 is one of the genes involved in a network promoting proper HR. Our findings link the double doses of X-linked genes with lower DNA repair activity, and this may have relevance for common diseases in female patients, such as breast cancer.

Abraxas suppresses DNA end resection and limits break-induced replication by controlling SLX4/MUS81 chromatin loading in response to TOP1 inhibitor-induced DNA damage

Although homologous recombination (HR) is indicated as a high-fidelity repair mechanism, break-induced replication (BIR), a subtype of HR, is a mutagenic mechanism that leads to chromosome rearrangements. It remains poorly understood how cells suppress mutagenic BIR. Trapping of Topoisomerase 1 by camptothecin (CPT) in a cleavage complex on the DNA can be transformed into single-ended double-strand breaks (seDSBs) upon DNA replication or colliding with transcriptional machinery. Here, we demonstrate a role of Abraxas in limiting seDSBs undergoing BIR-dependent mitotic DNA synthesis. Through counteracting K63-linked ubiquitin modification, Abraxas restricts SLX4/Mus81 recruitment to CPT damage sites for cleavage and subsequent resection processed by MRE11 endonuclease, CtIP, and DNA2/BLM. Uncontrolled SLX4/MUS81 loading and excessive end resection due to Abraxas-deficiency leads to increased mitotic DNA synthesis via RAD52- and POLD3- dependent, RAD51-independent BIR and extensive chromosome aberrations. Our work implicates Abraxas/BRCA1-A complex as a critical regulator that restrains BIR for protection of genome stability.

DHX9-dependent recruitment of BRCA1 to RNA promotes DNA end resection in homologous recombination

Double stranded DNA Breaks (DSB) that occur in highly transcribed regions of the genome are preferentially repaired by homologous recombination repair (HR). However, the mechanisms that link transcription with HR are unknown. Here we identify a critical role for DHX9, a RNA helicase involved in the processing of pre-mRNA during transcription, in the initiation of HR. Cells that are deficient in DHX9 are impaired in the recruitment of RPA and RAD51 to sites of DNA damage and fail to repair DSB by HR. Consequently, these cells are hypersensitive to treatment with agents such as camptothecin and Olaparib that block transcription and generate DSB that specifically require HR for their repair. We show that DHX9 plays a critical role in HR by promoting the recruitment of BRCA1 to RNA as part of the RNA Polymerase II transcription complex, where it facilitates the resection of DSB. Moreover, defects in DHX9 also lead to impaired ATR-mediated damage signalling and an inability to restart DNA replication at camptothecin-induced DSB. Together, our data reveal a previously unknown role for DHX9 in the DNA Damage Response that provides a critical link between RNA, RNA Pol II and the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination.

DHX9 is an RNA helicase involved in the processing of pre-mRNA during transcription. Here the authors reveal a role for DHX9 in the initiation of homologues recombination during the early steps of end-resection.

Bivalent recognition of histone marks by BARD1

BARD1 directs BRCA1 to DNA damage sites to facilitate homology recombination. Zhou and colleagues have now determined the cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of BARD1 bound to a nucleosome core particle with two marks: H2AK15ub and H4K20me0. The structure illustrates how bivalent recognition of both marks mediates highly specified recruitment of the BARD1-BRCA1 complex.

Post-Translational Modifications of Deubiquitinating Enzymes: Expanding the Ubiquitin Code

Post-translational modifications such as ubiquitination play important regulatory roles in several biological processes in eukaryotes. This process could be reversed by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), which remove conjugated ubiquitin molecules from target substrates. Owing to their role as essential enzymes in regulating all ubiquitin-related processes, the abundance, localization, and catalytic activity of DUBs are tightly regulated. Dysregulation of DUBs can cause dramatic physiological consequences and a variety of disorders such as cancer, and neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases. Multiple factors, such as transcription and translation of associated genes, and the presence of accessory domains, binding proteins, and inhibitors have been implicated in several aspects of DUB regulation. Beyond this level of regulation, emerging studies show that the function of DUBs can be regulated by a variety of post-translational modifications, which significantly affect the abundance, localization, and catalytic activity of DUBs. The most extensively studied post-translational modification of DUBs is phosphorylation. Besides phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, acetylation, oxidation, and hydroxylation are also reported in DUBs. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the regulatory effects of post-translational modifications of DUBs.

Communication between chromatin and homologous recombination

Higher-order chromatin packing serves as a structural barrier to the recognition and repair of genomic lesions. The initiation and outcome of the repair response is dictated by a highly coordinated yet complex interplay between chromatin modifying enzymes and their cognate readers, damage induced chemical modifications, nucleosome density, transcriptional state, and cell cycle-dependent availability of DNA repair machinery. The physical and chemical properties of the DNA lesions themselves further regulate the nature of ensuing chromatin responses. Here we review recent discoveries across these various contexts, where chromatin regulates the homology-guided double-strand break repair mechanism, homologous recombination, and also highlight the key knowledge gaps vital to generate a holistic understanding of this process and its contributions to genome integrity.

Untangling the crosstalk between BRCA1 and R-loops during DNA repair

R-loops are RNA:DNA hybrids assembled during biological processes but are also linked to genetic instability when formed out of their natural context. Emerging evidence suggests that the repair of DNA double-strand breaks requires the formation of a transient R-loop, which eventually must be removed to guarantee a correct repair process. The multifaceted BRCA1 protein has been shown to be recruited at this specific break-induced R-loop, and it facilitates mechanisms in order to regulate R-loop removal. In this review, we discuss the different potential roles of BRCA1 in R-loop homeostasis during DNA repair and how these processes ensure faithful DSB repair.

Role of deubiquitinating enzymes in DNA double-strand break repair

DNA is the hereditary material in humans and almost all other organisms. It is essential for maintaining accurate transmission of genetic information. In the life cycle, DNA replication, cell division, or genome damage, including that caused by endogenous and exogenous agents, may cause DNA aberrations. Of all forms of DNA damage, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most serious. If the repair function is defective, DNA damage may cause gene mutation, genome instability, and cell chromosome loss, which in turn can even lead to tumorigenesis. DNA damage can be repaired through multiple mechanisms. Homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) are the two main repair mechanisms for DNA DSBs. Increasing amounts of evidence reveal that protein modifications play an essential role in DNA damage repair. Protein deubiquitination is a vital post-translational modification which removes ubiquitin molecules or polyubiquitinated chains from substrates in order to reverse the ubiquitination reaction. This review discusses the role of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) in repairing DNA DSBs. Exploring the molecular mechanisms of DUB regulation in DSB repair will provide new insights to combat human diseases and develop novel therapeutic approaches.

CHD7 and 53BP1 regulate distinct pathways for the re-ligation of DNA double-strand breaks

Chromatin structure is dynamically reorganized at multiple levels in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Yet, how the different steps of chromatin reorganization are coordinated in space and time to differentially regulate DNA repair pathways is insufficiently understood. Here, we identify the Chromodomain Helicase DNA Binding Protein 7 (CHD7), which is frequently mutated in CHARGE syndrome, as an integral component of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) DSB repair pathway. Upon recruitment via PARP1-triggered chromatin remodeling, CHD7 stimulates further chromatin relaxation around DNA break sites and brings in HDAC1/2 for localized chromatin de-acetylation. This counteracts the CHD7-induced chromatin expansion, thereby ensuring temporally and spatially controlled 'chromatin breathing' upon DNA damage, which we demonstrate fosters efficient and accurate DSB repair by controlling Ku and LIG4/XRCC4 activities. Loss of CHD7-HDAC1/2-dependent cNHEJ reinforces 53BP1 assembly at the damaged chromatin and shifts DSB repair to mutagenic NHEJ, revealing a backup function of 53BP1 when cNHEJ fails.

BRCA1-A and BRISC: Multifunctional Molecular Machines for Ubiquitin Signaling

The K63-linkage specific deubiquitinase BRCC36 forms the core of two multi-subunit deubiquitination complexes: BRCA1-A and BRISC. BRCA1-A is recruited to DNA repair foci, edits ubiquitin signals on chromatin, and sequesters BRCA1 away from the site of damage, suppressing homologous recombination by limiting resection. BRISC forms a complex with metabolic enzyme SHMT2 and regulates the immune response, mitosis, and hematopoiesis. Almost two decades of research have revealed how BRCA1-A and BRISC use the same core of subunits to perform very distinct biological tasks.

FANCJ compensates for RAP80 deficiency and suppresses genomic instability induced by interstrand cross-links

FANCJ, a DNA helicase and interacting partner of the tumor suppressor BRCA1, is crucial for the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICL), a highly toxic lesion that leads to chromosomal instability and perturbs normal transcription. In diploid cells, FANCJ is believed to operate in homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB); however, its precise role and molecular mechanism is poorly understood. Moreover, compensatory mechanisms of ICL resistance when FANCJ is deficient have not been explored. In this work, we conducted a siRNA screen to identify genes of the DNA damage response/DNA repair regime that when acutely depleted sensitize FANCJ CRISPR knockout cells to a low concentration of the DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin C (MMC). One of the top hits from the screen was RAP80, a protein that recruits repair machinery to broken DNA ends and regulates DNA end-processing. Concomitant loss of FANCJ and RAP80 not only accentuates DNA damage levels in human cells but also adversely affects the cell cycle checkpoint, resulting in profound chromosomal instability. Genetic complementation experiments demonstrated that both FANCJ's catalytic activity and interaction with BRCA1 are important for ICL resistance when RAP80 is deficient. The elevated RPA and RAD51 foci in cells co-deficient of FANCJ and RAP80 exposed to MMC are attributed to single-stranded DNA created by Mre11 and CtIP nucleases. Altogether, our cell-based findings together with biochemical studies suggest a critical function of FANCJ to suppress incompletely processed and toxic joint DNA molecules during repair of ICL-induced DNA damage.

Epigenetic Regulation and Dietary Control of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a highly heterogeneous group of breast cancers, lacking expression of the estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). TNBC are characterized by a high level of mutation and metastasis, poor clinical outcomes and overall survival. Here, we review the epigenetic mechanisms of regulation involved in cell pathways disrupted in TNBC, with particular emphasis on dietary food components that may be exploited for the development of effective strategies for management of TNBC.

PHF2 regulates homology-directed DNA repair by controlling the resection of DNA double strand breaks

Post-translational histone modifications and chromatin remodelling play a critical role controlling the integrity of the genome. Here, we identify histone lysine demethylase PHF2 as a novel regulator of the DNA damage response by regulating DNA damage-induced focus formation of 53BP1 and BRCA1, critical factors in the pathway choice for DNA double strand break repair. PHF2 knockdown leads to impaired BRCA1 focus formation and delays the resolution of 53BP1 foci. Moreover, irradiation-induced RPA phosphorylation and focus formation, as well as localization of CtIP, required for DNA end resection, to sites of DNA lesions are affected by depletion of PHF2. These results are indicative of a defective resection of double strand breaks and thereby an impaired homologous recombination upon PHF2 depletion. In accordance with these data, Rad51 focus formation and homology-directed double strand break repair is inhibited in cells depleted for PHF2. Importantly, we demonstrate that PHF2 knockdown decreases CtIP and BRCA1 protein and mRNA levels, an effect that is dependent on the demethylase activity of PHF2. Furthermore, PHF2-depleted cells display genome instability and are mildly sensitive to the inhibition of PARP. Together these results demonstrate that PHF2 promotes DNA repair by homologous recombination by controlling CtIP-dependent resection of double strand breaks.

The Chromatin Response to Double-Strand DNA Breaks and Their Repair

Cellular DNA is constantly being damaged by numerous internal and external mutagenic factors. Probably the most severe type of insults DNA could suffer are the double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs). They sever both DNA strands and compromise genomic stability, causing deleterious chromosomal aberrations that are implicated in numerous maladies, including cancer. Not surprisingly, cells have evolved several DSB repair pathways encompassing hundreds of different DNA repair proteins to cope with this challenge. In eukaryotic cells, DSB repair is fulfilled in the immensely complex environment of the chromatin. The chromatin is not just a passive background that accommodates the multitude of DNA repair proteins, but it is a highly dynamic and active participant in the repair process. Chromatin alterations, such as changing patterns of histone modifications shaped by numerous histone-modifying enzymes and chromatin remodeling, are pivotal for proficient DSB repair. Dynamic chromatin changes ensure accessibility to the damaged region, recruit DNA repair proteins, and regulate their association and activity, contributing to DSB repair pathway choice and coordination. Given the paramount importance of DSB repair in tumorigenesis and cancer progression, DSB repair has turned into an attractive target for the development of novel anticancer therapies, some of which have already entered the clinic.

Regulation of Histone Ubiquitination in Response to DNA Double Strand Breaks

Eukaryotic cells are constantly exposed to both endogenous and exogenous stressors that promote the induction of DNA damage. Of this damage, double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most lethal and must be efficiently repaired in order to maintain genomic integrity. Repair of DSBs occurs primarily through one of two major pathways: non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR). The choice between these pathways is in part regulated by histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) including ubiquitination. Ubiquitinated histones not only influence transcription and chromatin architecture at sites neighboring DSBs but serve as critical recruitment platforms for repair machinery as well. The reversal of these modifications by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) is increasingly being recognized in a number of cellular processes including DSB repair. In this context, DUBs ensure proper levels of ubiquitin, regulate recruitment of downstream effectors, dictate repair pathway choice, and facilitate appropriate termination of the repair response. This review outlines the current understanding of histone ubiquitination in response to DSBs, followed by a comprehensive overview of the DUBs that catalyze the removal of these marks.

DNA double-strand break end resection: a critical relay point for determining the pathway of repair and signaling

A DNA double-strand break (DSB) is considered the most critical DNA lesion because it causes cell death and severe mutations if it is not repaired or repaired incorrectly. Accumulating evidence has shown that the majority of DSBs are repaired by DNA non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), the first utilized repair pathway in human cells. In contrast, the repair pathway is sometimes diverted into using homologous recombination (HR), which has increased precision under specific circumstances: e.g., when DSBs are generated at transcriptionally active loci or are not readily repaired due to the complexity of damage at the DSB ends or due to highly compacted chromatin. DSB end resection (resection) is considered the most critical turning point for directing repair towards HR. After resection, the HR process is finalized by RAD51 loading and recombination. Thus, understanding the process of resection is critically important to understand the regulation of the choice of DSB repair pathway. In addition, resection is also an important factor influencing DNA damage signaling because unresected ends preferentially activate ATM, whereas longer resected ends activate ATR. Thus, DSB end resection is a key relay point that determines the repair pathway and the signal balance. In this review, we summarize the mechanism underlying DSB end resection and further discuss how it is involved in cancer therapy.

Role of H3K9 demethylases in DNA double-strand break repair

H3K9 demethylases can remove the repressive H3K9 methylation marks on histones to alter chromatin structure, gene transcription and epigenetic state of cells. By counteracting the function of H3K9 methyltransferases, H3K9 demethylases have been shown to play an important role in numerous biological processes, including diseases such as cancer. Recent evidence points to a key role for some H3K9 demethylases in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) via homologous recombination (HR) and/or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways. Mechanistically, H3K9 demethylases can upregulate the expression of DNA repair factors. They can also be recruited to the DNA damage sites and regulate the recruitment or function of DNA repair factors. Here, we will discuss the role and mechanisms of H3K9 demethylases in the regulation of DSB repair.

Protein expression profiling identifies differential modulation of homologous recombination by platinum-based antitumor agents

PURPOSE

Oxaliplatin and satraplatin demonstrate activity against cisplatin-resistant tumor cells. Although the two platinum analogs are structurally-related, oxaliplatin is more active. Therefore, studies focusing on protein expression profiling were undertaken to identify the molecular mechanism for the difference in antitumor activity.

METHODS

We included cisplatin as reference and DAP as a Pt(IV)-prodrug of oxaliplatin to offset Pt(IV) status of satraplatin, and utilized A2780, cisplatin-resistant 2780CP/Cl-16, U2OS, and HCT-116 tumor cells in the investigation. Protein expressions following drug exposures were examined by reverse-phase protein array and ingenuity pathway analysis. Cell cycle was assessed by flow cytometry, cytotoxicity by growth inhibition assay, and homologous recombination (HR) by a GFP reporter assay.

RESULTS

Clustering analysis paired oxaliplatin with DAP and, surprisingly, satraplatin with cisplatin. This correlated with differential upregulation of p53/p21 pathway, with S and G2/M arrests by cisplatin and satraplatin in contrast to G1 arrest by oxaliplatin and DAP. Moreover, Rad51 and BRCA1 were severely downregulated by oxaliplatin and DAP, but not cisplatin and satraplatin. As a result, HR was inhibited only by oxaliplatin and DAP and this also contributed to their greater drug activity over cisplatin and satraplatin.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin and DAP robustly activate p53 and p21, which downregulate HR proteins to enhance drug activity. More significantly, since oxaliplatin induces a BRCAness state, it may have potential against BRCA-proficient cancers. Satraplatin, on the other hand, resembled cisplatin in its protein expression profile, which indicates that small changes in chemical structure can substantially alter signal transduction pathways to modulate drug activity.