1
|
Takata H, Masuda Y, Ohmido N. CRISPR imaging reveals chromatin fluctuation at the centromere region related to cellular senescence. Sci Rep 2023; 13:14609. [PMID: 37670098 PMCID: PMC10480159 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41770-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The human genome is spatially and temporally organized in the nucleus as chromatin, and the dynamic structure of chromatin is closely related to genome functions. Cellular senescence characterized by an irreversible arrest of proliferation is accompanied by chromatin reorganisation in the nucleus during senescence. However, chromatin dynamics in chromatin reorganisation is poorly understood. Here, we report chromatin dynamics at the centromere region during senescence in cultured human cell lines using live imaging based on the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/dCas9 system. The repetitive sequence at the centromere region, alpha-satellite DNA, was predominantly detected on chromosomes 1, 12, and 19. Centromeric chromatin formed irregular-shaped domains with high fluctuation in cells undergoing 5'-aza-2'-deoxycytidine-induced senescence. Our findings suggest that the increased fluctuation of the chromatin structure facilitates centromere disorganisation during cellular senescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Takata
- Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ikeda, Osaka, 563-8577, Japan.
| | - Yumena Masuda
- Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan
| | - Nobuko Ohmido
- Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Episomes and Transposases-Utilities to Maintain Transgene Expression from Nonviral Vectors. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13101872. [PMID: 36292757 PMCID: PMC9601623 DOI: 10.3390/genes13101872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficient delivery and stable transgene expression are critical for applications in gene therapy. While carefully selected and engineered viral vectors allowed for remarkable clinical successes, they still bear significant safety risks. Thus, nonviral vectors are a sound alternative and avoid genotoxicity and adverse immunological reactions. Nonviral vector systems have been extensively studied and refined during the last decades. Emerging knowledge of the epigenetic regulation of replication and spatial chromatin organisation, as well as new technologies, such as Crispr/Cas, were employed to enhance the performance of different nonviral vector systems. Thus, nonviral vectors are in focus and hold some promising perspectives for future applications in gene therapy. This review addresses three prominent nonviral vector systems: the Sleeping Beauty transposase, S/MAR-based episomes, and viral plasmid replicon-based EBV vectors. Exemplarily, we review different utilities, modifications, and new concepts that were pursued to overcome limitations regarding stable transgene expression and mitotic stability. New insights into the nuclear localisation of nonviral vector molecules and the potential consequences thereof are highlighted. Finally, we discuss the remaining limitations and provide an outlook on possible future developments in nonviral vector technology.
Collapse
|
3
|
Altemose N, Glennis A, Bzikadze AV, Sidhwani P, Langley SA, Caldas GV, Hoyt SJ, Uralsky L, Ryabov FD, Shew CJ, Sauria MEG, Borchers M, Gershman A, Mikheenko A, Shepelev VA, Dvorkina T, Kunyavskaya O, Vollger MR, Rhie A, McCartney AM, Asri M, Lorig-Roach R, Shafin K, Aganezov S, Olson D, de Lima LG, Potapova T, Hartley GA, Haukness M, Kerpedjiev P, Gusev F, Tigyi K, Brooks S, Young A, Nurk S, Koren S, Salama SR, Paten B, Rogaev EI, Streets A, Karpen GH, Dernburg AF, Sullivan BA, Straight AF, Wheeler TJ, Gerton JL, Eichler EE, Phillippy AM, Timp W, Dennis MY, O'Neill RJ, Zook JM, Schatz MC, Pevzner PA, Diekhans M, Langley CH, Alexandrov IA, Miga KH. Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres. Science 2022; 376:eabl4178. [PMID: 35357911 PMCID: PMC9233505 DOI: 10.1126/science.abl4178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Existing human genome assemblies have almost entirely excluded repetitive sequences within and near centromeres, limiting our understanding of their organization, evolution, and functions, which include facilitating proper chromosome segregation. Now, a complete, telomere-to-telomere human genome assembly (T2T-CHM13) has enabled us to comprehensively characterize pericentromeric and centromeric repeats, which constitute 6.2% of the genome (189.9 megabases). Detailed maps of these regions revealed multimegabase structural rearrangements, including in active centromeric repeat arrays. Analysis of centromere-associated sequences uncovered a strong relationship between the position of the centromere and the evolution of the surrounding DNA through layered repeat expansions. Furthermore, comparisons of chromosome X centromeres across a diverse panel of individuals illuminated high degrees of structural, epigenetic, and sequence variation in these complex and rapidly evolving regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Altemose
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - A. Glennis
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrey V. Bzikadze
- Graduate Program in Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Pragya Sidhwani
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sasha A. Langley
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Gina V. Caldas
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Savannah J. Hoyt
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Lev Uralsky
- Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Colin J. Shew
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ariel Gershman
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alla Mikheenko
- Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Tatiana Dvorkina
- Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Olga Kunyavskaya
- Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Mitchell R. Vollger
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Arang Rhie
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ann M. McCartney
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mobin Asri
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Lorig-Roach
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Kishwar Shafin
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Sergey Aganezov
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Olson
- Department of Computer Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT. USA
| | | | - Tamara Potapova
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Gabrielle A. Hartley
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Marina Haukness
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | - Fedor Gusev
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kristof Tigyi
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Shelise Brooks
- NIH Intramural Sequencing Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alice Young
- NIH Intramural Sequencing Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sergey Nurk
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sergey Koren
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sofie R. Salama
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Benedict Paten
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Evgeny I. Rogaev
- Sirius University of Science and Technology, Sochi, Russia
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
- Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Aaron Streets
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gary H. Karpen
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- BioEngineering and BioMedical Sciences Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Abby F. Dernburg
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Beth A. Sullivan
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Travis J. Wheeler
- Department of Computer Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT. USA
| | - Jennifer L. Gerton
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA
- University of Kansas Medical School, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Cancer Center, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Evan E. Eichler
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Adam M. Phillippy
- Genome Informatics Section, Computational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Winston Timp
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Megan Y. Dennis
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Rachel J. O'Neill
- Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Justin M. Zook
- Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Michael C. Schatz
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pavel A. Pevzner
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mark Diekhans
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Charles H. Langley
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Ivan A. Alexandrov
- Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
- Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Karen H. Miga
- UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Balzano E, Giunta S. Centromeres under Pressure: Evolutionary Innovation in Conflict with Conserved Function. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:E912. [PMID: 32784998 PMCID: PMC7463522 DOI: 10.3390/genes11080912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Centromeres are essential genetic elements that enable spindle microtubule attachment for chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis. While this function is preserved across species, centromeres display an array of dynamic features, including: (1) rapidly evolving DNA; (2) wide evolutionary diversity in size, shape and organization; (3) evidence of mutational processes to generate homogenized repetitive arrays that characterize centromeres in several species; (4) tolerance to changes in position, as in the case of neocentromeres; and (5) intrinsic fragility derived by sequence composition and secondary DNA structures. Centromere drive underlies rapid centromere DNA evolution due to the "selfish" pursuit to bias meiotic transmission and promote the propagation of stronger centromeres. Yet, the origins of other dynamic features of centromeres remain unclear. Here, we review our current understanding of centromere evolution and plasticity. We also detail the mutagenic processes proposed to shape the divergent genetic nature of centromeres. Changes to centromeres are not simply evolutionary relics, but ongoing shifts that on one side promote centromere flexibility, but on the other can undermine centromere integrity and function with potential pathological implications such as genome instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Balzano
- Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy;
| | - Simona Giunta
- Laboratory of Chromosome and Cell Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sullivan LL, Sullivan BA. Genomic and functional variation of human centromeres. Exp Cell Res 2020; 389:111896. [PMID: 32035947 PMCID: PMC7140587 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Centromeres are central to chromosome segregation and genome stability, and thus their molecular foundations are important for understanding their function and the ways in which they go awry. Human centromeres typically form at large megabase-sized arrays of alpha satellite DNA for which there is little genomic understanding due to its repetitive nature. Consequently, it has been difficult to achieve genome assemblies at centromeres using traditional next generation sequencing approaches, so that centromeres represent gaps in the current human genome assembly. The role of alpha satellite DNA has been debated since centromeres can form, albeit rarely, on non-alpha satellite DNA. Conversely, the simple presence of alpha satellite DNA is not sufficient for centromere function since chromosomes with multiple alpha satellite arrays only exhibit a single location of centromere assembly. Here, we discuss the organization of human centromeres as well as genomic and functional variation in human centromere location, and current understanding of the genomic and epigenetic mechanisms that underlie centromere flexibility in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Beth A Sullivan
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, USA; Division of Human Genetics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Contreras-Galindo R, Fischer S, Saha AK, Lundy JD, Cervantes PW, Mourad M, Wang C, Qian B, Dai M, Meng F, Chinnaiyan A, Omenn GS, Kaplan MH, Markovitz DM. Rapid molecular assays to study human centromere genomics. Genome Res 2017; 27:2040-2049. [PMID: 29141960 PMCID: PMC5741061 DOI: 10.1101/gr.219709.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The centromere is the structural unit responsible for the faithful segregation of chromosomes. Although regulation of centromeric function by epigenetic factors has been well-studied, the contributions of the underlying DNA sequences have been much less well defined, and existing methodologies for studying centromere genomics in biology are laborious. We have identified specific markers in the centromere of 23 of the 24 human chromosomes that allow for rapid PCR assays capable of capturing the genomic landscape of human centromeres at a given time. Use of this genetic strategy can also delineate which specific centromere arrays in each chromosome drive the recruitment of epigenetic modulators. We further show that, surprisingly, loss and rearrangement of DNA in centromere 21 is associated with trisomy 21. This new approach can thus be used to rapidly take a snapshot of the genetics and epigenetics of each specific human centromere in nondisjunction disorders and other biological settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sabrina Fischer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Centro de Investigaciones Nucleares, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay 11400
| | - Anjan K Saha
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Program in Cancer Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - John D Lundy
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Patrick W Cervantes
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Mohamad Mourad
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Claire Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Brian Qian
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Manhong Dai
- Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Fan Meng
- Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Arul Chinnaiyan
- Michigan Center for Translational Pathology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA
| | - Gilbert S Omenn
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Department of Human Genetics.,Departments of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - Mark H Kaplan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - David M Markovitz
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Program in Cancer Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Program in Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.,Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dumont M, Fachinetti D. DNA Sequences in Centromere Formation and Function. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR AND SUBCELLULAR BIOLOGY 2017; 56:305-336. [PMID: 28840243 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58592-5_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Faithful chromosome segregation during cell division depends on the centromere, a complex DNA/protein structure that links chromosomes to spindle microtubules. This chromosomal domain has to be marked throughout cell division and its chromosomal localization preserved across cell generations. From fission yeast to human, centromeres are established on a series of repetitive DNA sequences and on specialized centromeric chromatin. This chromatin is enriched with the histone H3 variant, named CENP-A, that was demonstrated to be the epigenetic mark that maintains centromere identity and function indefinitely. Although centromere identity is thought to be exclusively epigenetic, the presence of specific DNA sequences in the majority of eukaryotes and of the centromeric protein CENP-B that binds to these sequences, suggests the existence of a genetic component as well. In this review, we will highlight the importance of centromeric sequences for centromere formation and function, and discuss the centromere DNA sequence/CENP-B paradox.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dumont
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR 144, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
| | - D Fachinetti
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR 144, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ollion J, Loll F, Cochennec J, Boudier T, Escudé C. Proliferation-dependent positioning of individual centromeres in the interphase nucleus of human lymphoblastoid cell lines. Mol Biol Cell 2015; 26:2550-60. [PMID: 25947134 PMCID: PMC4571307 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e14-05-1002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2014] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Centromeres are not randomly distributed in interphase nuclei. High-throughput imaging provides an accurate characterization of how their organization varies as a function of the proliferation state in human lymphoblastoid cells. The results suggest the existence of mechanisms that drive the nuclear positioning of centromeres. The cell nucleus is a highly organized structure and plays an important role in gene regulation. Understanding the mechanisms that sustain this organization is therefore essential for understanding genome function. Centromeric regions (CRs) of chromosomes have been known for years to adopt specific nuclear positioning patterns, but the significance of this observation is not yet completely understood. Here, using a combination of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunochemistry on fixed human cells and high-throughput imaging, we directly and quantitatively investigated the nuclear positioning of specific human CRs. We observe differential attraction of individual CRs toward both the nuclear border and the nucleoli, the former being enhanced in nonproliferating cells and the latter being enhanced in proliferating cells. Similar positioning patterns are observed in two different lymphoblastoid cell lines. Moreover, the positioning of CRs differs from that of noncentromeric regions, and CRs display specific orientations within chromosome territories. These results suggest the existence of not-yet-characterized mechanisms that drive the nuclear positioning of CRs and therefore pave the way toward a better understanding of how CRs affect nuclear organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Ollion
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1154, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7196, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 75231 Paris, France
| | - François Loll
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1154, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7196, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 75231 Paris, France
| | - Julien Cochennec
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1154, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7196, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 75231 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Boudier
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Sorbonne Universités, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Escudé
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1154, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7196, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 75231 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bodor DL, Mata JF, Sergeev M, David AF, Salimian KJ, Panchenko T, Cleveland DW, Black BE, Shah JV, Jansen LE. The quantitative architecture of centromeric chromatin. eLife 2014; 3:e02137. [PMID: 25027692 PMCID: PMC4091408 DOI: 10.7554/elife.02137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The centromere, responsible for chromosome segregation during mitosis, is epigenetically defined by CENP-A containing chromatin. The amount of centromeric CENP-A has direct implications for both the architecture and epigenetic inheritance of centromeres. Using complementary strategies, we determined that typical human centromeres contain ∼400 molecules of CENP-A, which is controlled by a mass-action mechanism. This number, despite representing only ∼4% of all centromeric nucleosomes, forms a ∼50-fold enrichment to the overall genome. In addition, although pre-assembled CENP-A is randomly segregated during cell division, this amount of CENP-A is sufficient to prevent stochastic loss of centromere function and identity. Finally, we produced a statistical map of CENP-A occupancy at a human neocentromere and identified nucleosome positions that feature CENP-A in a majority of cells. In summary, we present a quantitative view of the centromere that provides a mechanistic framework for both robust epigenetic inheritance of centromeres and the paucity of neocentromere formation. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02137.001 The genetic information in a cell is packed into structures called chromosomes. These contain strands of DNA wrapped around proteins called histones, which helps the long DNA chains to fit inside the relatively small nucleus of the cell. When a cell divides, it is important that both of the new cells contain all of the genetic information found in the parent cell. Therefore, the chromosomes duplicate during cell division, with the two copies held together at a single region of the chromosome called the centromere. The centromere then recruits and coordinates the molecular machinery that separates the two copies into different cells. Centromeres are inherited in an epigenetic manner. This means that there is no specific DNA sequence that defines the location of this structure on the chromosomes. Rather, a special type of histone, called CENP-A, is involved in defining its location. Bodor et al. use multiple techniques to show that human centromeres normally contain around 400 molecules of CENP-A, and that this number is crucial for ensuring that centromeres form in the right place. Interestingly, only a minority of the CENP-A molecules are located at centromeres; yet this is more than at any other region of the chromosome. This explains why centromeres are only formed at a single position on each chromosome. When the chromosomes separate, the CENP-A molecules at the centromere are randomly divided between the two copies. In this way memory of the centromere location is maintained. If the number of copies of CENP-A inherited by one of the chromosomes drops below a threshold value, a centromere will not form. However, Bodor et al. found that the number of CENP-A molecules in a centromere is large enough, not only to support the formation of the centromere structure, but also to keep it above the threshold value in nearly all cases. This threshold is also high enough to make it unlikely that a centromere will form in the wrong place because of a random fluctuation in the number of CENP-A molecules. Therefore, the number of CENP-A molecules is crucial for controlling both the formation and the inheritance of the centromere. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02137.002
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dani L Bodor
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
| | - João F Mata
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
| | - Mikhail Sergeev
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
| | | | - Kevan J Salimian
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Tanya Panchenko
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Don W Cleveland
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
| | - Ben E Black
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Jagesh V Shah
- Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Graham AN, Kalitsis P. Chromosome Y centromere array deletion leads to impaired centromere function. PLoS One 2014; 9:e86875. [PMID: 24466276 PMCID: PMC3899357 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2013] [Accepted: 12/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The centromere is an essential chromosomal structure that is required for the faithful distribution of replicated chromosomes to daughter cells. Defects in the centromere can compromise the stability of chromosomes resulting in segregation errors. We have characterised the centromeric structure of the spontaneous mutant mouse strain, BALB/cWt, which exhibits a high rate of Y chromosome instability. The Y centromere DNA array shows a de novo interstitial deletion and a reduction in the level of the foundation centromere protein, CENP-A, when compared to the non-deleted centromere array in the progenitor strain. These results suggest there is a lower threshold limit of centromere size that ensures full kinetochore function during cell division.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison N. Graham
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul Kalitsis
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sullivan LL, Boivin CD, Mravinac B, Song IY, Sullivan BA. Genomic size of CENP-A domain is proportional to total alpha satellite array size at human centromeres and expands in cancer cells. Chromosome Res 2011; 19:457-70. [PMID: 21484447 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-011-9208-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2011] [Revised: 03/26/2011] [Accepted: 03/29/2011] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Human centromeres contain multi-megabase-sized arrays of alpha satellite DNA, a family of satellite DNA repeats based on a tandemly arranged 171 bp monomer. The centromere-specific histone protein CENP-A is assembled on alpha satellite DNA within the primary constriction, but does not extend along its entire length. CENP-A domains have been estimated to extend over 2,500 kb of alpha satellite DNA. However, these estimates do not take into account inter-individual variation in alpha satellite array sizes on homologous chromosomes and among different chromosomes. We defined the genomic distance of CENP-A chromatin on human chromosomes X and Y from different individuals. CENP-A chromatin occupied different genomic intervals on different chromosomes, but despite inter-chromosomal and inter-individual array size variation, the ratio of CENP-A to total alpha satellite DNA size remained consistent. Changes in the ratio of alpha satellite array size to CENP-A domain size were observed when CENP-A was overexpressed and when primary cells were transformed by disrupting interactions between the tumor suppressor protein Rb and chromatin. Our data support a model for centromeric domain organization in which the genomic limits of CENP-A chromatin varies on different human chromosomes, and imply that alpha satellite array size may be a more prominent predictor of CENP-A incorporation than chromosome size. In addition, our results also suggest that cancer transformation and amounts of centromeric heterochromatin have notable effects on the amount of alpha satellite that is associated with CENP-A chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori L Sullivan
- Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pérez-Luz S, Díaz-Nido J. Prospects for the use of artificial chromosomes and minichromosome-like episomes in gene therapy. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010; 2010:642804. [PMID: 20862363 PMCID: PMC2938438 DOI: 10.1155/2010/642804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2010] [Revised: 06/02/2010] [Accepted: 07/05/2010] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial chromosomes and minichromosome-like episomes are large DNA molecules capable of containing whole genomic loci, and be maintained as nonintegrating, replicating molecules in proliferating human somatic cells. Authentic human artificial chromosomes are very difficult to engineer because of the difficulties associated with centromere structure, so they are not widely used for gene-therapy applications. However, OriP/EBNA1-based episomes, which they lack true centromeres, can be maintained stably in dividing cells as they bind to mitotic chromosomes and segregate into daughter cells. These episomes are more easily engineered than true human artificial chromosomes and can carry entire genes along with all their regulatory sequences. Thus, these constructs may facilitate the long-term persistence and physiological regulation of the expression of therapeutic genes, which is crucial for some gene therapy applications. In particular, they are promising vectors for gene therapy in inherited diseases that are caused by recessive mutations, for example haemophilia A and Friedreich's ataxia. Interestingly, the episome carrying the frataxin gene (deficient in Friedreich's ataxia) has been demonstrated to rescue the susceptibility to oxidative stress which is typical of fibroblasts from Friedreich's ataxia patients. This provides evidence of their potential to treat genetic diseases linked to recessive mutations through gene therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Pérez-Luz
- Departamento de Biología Molecular, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stimpson KM, Song IY, Jauch A, Holtgreve-Grez H, Hayden KE, Bridger JM, Sullivan BA. Telomere disruption results in non-random formation of de novo dicentric chromosomes involving acrocentric human chromosomes. PLoS Genet 2010; 6. [PMID: 20711355 PMCID: PMC2920838 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2010] [Accepted: 07/12/2010] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Genome rearrangement often produces chromosomes with two centromeres (dicentrics) that are inherently unstable because of bridge formation and breakage during cell division. However, mammalian dicentrics, and particularly those in humans, can be quite stable, usually because one centromere is functionally silenced. Molecular mechanisms of centromere inactivation are poorly understood since there are few systems to experimentally create dicentric human chromosomes. Here, we describe a human cell culture model that enriches for de novo dicentrics. We demonstrate that transient disruption of human telomere structure non-randomly produces dicentric fusions involving acrocentric chromosomes. The induced dicentrics vary in structure near fusion breakpoints and like naturally-occurring dicentrics, exhibit various inter-centromeric distances. Many functional dicentrics persist for months after formation. Even those with distantly spaced centromeres remain functionally dicentric for 20 cell generations. Other dicentrics within the population reflect centromere inactivation. In some cases, centromere inactivation occurs by an apparently epigenetic mechanism. In other dicentrics, the size of the α-satellite DNA array associated with CENP-A is reduced compared to the same array before dicentric formation. Extra-chromosomal fragments that contained CENP-A often appear in the same cells as dicentrics. Some of these fragments are derived from the same α-satellite DNA array as inactivated centromeres. Our results indicate that dicentric human chromosomes undergo alternative fates after formation. Many retain two active centromeres and are stable through multiple cell divisions. Others undergo centromere inactivation. This event occurs within a broad temporal window and can involve deletion of chromatin that marks the locus as a site for CENP-A maintenance/replenishment. Endogenous human centromeres are defined by large arrays of α-satellite DNA. A portion of each α-satellite array is assembled into CENP-A chromatin, the structural and functional platform for kinetochore formation. Most chromosomes are monocentric, meaning they have a single centromere. However, genome rearrangement can produce chromosomes with two centromeres (dicentrics). In most organisms, dicentrics typically break during cell division; however, dicentric human chromosomes can be stable in mitosis and meiosis. This stability reflects centromere inactivation, a poorly understood phenomenon in which one centromere is functionally silenced. To explore molecular and genomic events that occur at the time of dicentric formation, we describe a cell-based system to create dicentric human chromosomes and monitor their behavior after formation. Such dicentrics can experience several fates, including centromere inactivation, breakage, or maintaining two functional centromeres. Unexpectedly, we also find that dicentrics with large (>20Mb) inter-centromeric distances are stable through at least 20 cell divisions. Our results highlight similarities and differences in dicentric behavior between humans and model organisms, and they provide evidence for one mechanism of centromere inactivation by centromeric deletion in some dicentrics. The ability to create dicentric human chromosomes provides a system to test other mechanisms of centromere disassembly and dicentric chromosome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin M. Stimpson
- Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ihn Young Song
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Anna Jauch
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heidi Holtgreve-Grez
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karen E. Hayden
- Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Joanna M. Bridger
- Laboratory of Nuclear and Genomic Health, Centre for Cell and Chromosome Biology, Division of Biosciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - Beth A. Sullivan
- Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bourthoumieu S, Esclaire F, Terro F, Brosset P, Fiorenza M, Aubard V, Beguet M, Yardin C. Familial 18 centromere variant resulting in difficulties in interpreting prenatal interphase FISH. Morphologie 2010; 94:68-72. [PMID: 20304695 DOI: 10.1016/j.morpho.2010.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
We report here on a familial case of centromeric heteromorphism of chromosome 18 detected by prenatal interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis transmitted by the mother to her fetus, and resulting in complete loss of one 18 signal. The prenatal diagnosis was performed by interphase FISH (AneuVysion probe set, and LSI DiGeorge 22q11.2 kit) because of the presence of an isolated fetal cardiac abnormality, and was first difficult to interpret: only one centromeric 18 signal was detectable on prenatal interphase nuclei, along with one signal for the Y and one for the X chromosome. The LSI DiGeorge 22q11.2 kit also showed the absence of one TUPLE 1 signal on all examined nuclei. In fact, the FISH performed on maternal buccal smear displayed the same absence of one chromosome 18 centromeric signal, combined with the presence of two TUPLE1 signals. All these results led to the diagnosis of an isolated 22q11.2 fetal microdeletion that was confirmed on metaphases spreads. This case illustrates once again that the locus specific (LSI) probes are more effective than the alpha centromeric probes for interphase analysis. The development of high-quality LSI probes for chromosomes 18, X and Y could avoid the misinterpretation of prenatal interphase FISH leading to numerous additional and expensive investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bourthoumieu
- Service de cytogénétique, hôpital de la mère et de l'enfant, CHU de Dupuytren, 8, avenue Dominique-Larrey, 87042 Limoges cedex, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pironon N, Puechberty J, Roizès G. Molecular and evolutionary characteristics of the fraction of human alpha satellite DNA associated with CENP-A at the centromeres of chromosomes 1, 5, 19, and 21. BMC Genomics 2010; 11:195. [PMID: 20331851 PMCID: PMC2853522 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2009] [Accepted: 03/23/2010] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The mode of evolution of the highly homogeneous Higher-Order-Repeat-containing alpha satellite arrays is still subject to discussion. This is also true of the CENP-A associated repeats where the centromere is formed. Results In this paper, we show that the molecular mechanisms by which these arrays evolve are identical in multiple chromosomes: i) accumulation of crossovers that homogenise and expand the arrays into different domains and subdomains that are mostly unshared between homologues and ii) sporadic mutations and conversion events that simultaneously differentiate them from one another. Individual arrays are affected by these mechanisms to different extents that presumably increase with time. Repeats associated with CENP-A, where the centromere is formed, are subjected to the same evolutionary mechanisms, but constitute minor subsets that exhibit subtle sequence differences from those of the bulk repeats. While the DNA sequence per se is not essential for centromere localisation along an array, it appears that certain sequences can be selected against. On chromosomes 1 and 19, which are more affected by the above evolutionary mechanisms than are chromosomes 21 and 5, CENP-A associated repeats were also recovered from a second homogeneous array present on each chromosome. This could be a way for chromosomes to sustain mitosis and meiosis when the normal centromere locus is ineluctably undermined by the above mechanisms. Conclusion We discuss, in light of these observations, possible scenarios for the normal evolutionary fates of human centromeric regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Pironon
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, UPR 1142, CNRS, 141 Rue de Cardonille, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Bruijn DRH, van Dijk AHA, Pfundt R, Hoischen A, Merkx GFM, Gradek GA, Lybæk H, Stray-Pedersen A, Brunner HG, Houge G. Severe Progressive Autism Associated with Two de novo Changes: A 2.6-Mb 2q31.1 Deletion and a Balanced t(14;21)(q21.1;p11.2) Translocation with Long-Range Epigenetic Silencing of LRFN5 Expression. Mol Syndromol 2010; 1:46-57. [PMID: 20648246 DOI: 10.1159/000280290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2009] [Accepted: 12/02/2009] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In a 19-year-old severely autistic and mentally retarded girl, a balanced de novo t(14;21)(q21.1;p11.2) translocation was found in addition to a de novo 2.6-Mb 2q31.1 deletion containing 15 protein-encoding genes. To investigate if the translocation might contribute to developmental stagnation at the age of 2 years with later regression of skills, i.e. a more severe phenotype than expected from the 2q31.1 deletion, the epigenetic status and expression of genes proximal and distal to the 14q21.1 breakpoint were investigated in Ebstein Barr Virus-transformed lymphoblast and primary skin fibroblast cells. The 14q21.1 breakpoint was found to be located between a cluster of 7 genes 0.1 Mb upstream, starting with FBXO33, and the single and isolated LRFN5 gene 2.1 Mb downstream. Only expression of LRFN5 appeared to be affected by its novel genomic context. In patient fibroblasts, LRFN5 expression was 10-fold reduced compared to LRFN5 expressed in control fibroblasts. In addition, a relative increase in trimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9M3)-associated DNA starting exactly at the translocation breakpoint and going 2.5 Mb beyond the LRFN5 gene was found. At the LRFN5 promoter, there was a distinct peak of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27M3)-associated DNA in addition to a diminished trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4M3) level. We speculate that dysregulation of LRFN5, a postsynaptic density-associated gene, may contribute to the patient's autism, even though 2 other patients with 14q13.2q21.3 deletions that included LRFN5 were not autistic. More significantly, we have shown that translocations may influence gene expression more than 2 Mb away from the translocation breakpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D R H de Bruijn
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Wong LH, Brettingham-Moore KH, Chan L, Quach JM, Anderson MA, Northrop EL, Hannan R, Saffery R, Shaw ML, Williams E, Choo KHA. Centromere RNA is a key component for the assembly of nucleoproteins at the nucleolus and centromere. Genes Dev 2007; 17:1146-60. [PMID: 17623812 PMCID: PMC1933521 DOI: 10.1101/gr.6022807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 223] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2006] [Accepted: 04/27/2007] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The centromere is a complex structure, the components and assembly pathway of which remain inadequately defined. Here, we demonstrate that centromeric alpha-satellite RNA and proteins CENPC1 and INCENP accumulate in the human interphase nucleolus in an RNA polymerase I-dependent manner. The nucleolar targeting of CENPC1 and INCENP requires alpha-satellite RNA, as evident from the delocalization of both proteins from the nucleolus in RNase-treated cells, and the nucleolar relocalization of these proteins following alpha-satellite RNA replenishment in these cells. Using protein truncation and in vitro mutagenesis, we have identified the nucleolar localization sequences on CENPC1 and INCENP. We present evidence that CENPC1 is an RNA-associating protein that binds alpha-satellite RNA by an in vitro binding assay. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, RNase treatment, and "RNA replenishment" experiments, we show that alpha-satellite RNA is a key component in the assembly of CENPC1, INCENP, and survivin (an INCENP-interacting protein) at the metaphase centromere. Our data suggest that centromere satellite RNA directly facilitates the accumulation and assembly of centromere-specific nucleoprotein components at the nucleolus and mitotic centromere, and that the sequestration of these components in the interphase nucleolus provides a regulatory mechanism for their timely release into the nucleoplasm for kinetochore assembly at the onset of mitosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee H Wong
- Chromosome and Chromatin Research Laboratory, Murdoch Children's Research Institute & Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Paar V, Basar I, Rosandić M, Glunčić M. Consensus higher order repeats and frequency of string distributions in human genome. Curr Genomics 2007; 8:93-111. [PMID: 18660848 PMCID: PMC2435359 DOI: 10.2174/138920207780368169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2007] [Revised: 01/26/2007] [Accepted: 01/30/2007] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Key string algorithm (KSA) could be viewed as robust computational generalization of restriction enzyme method. KSA enables robust and effective identification and structural analyzes of any given genomic sequences, like in the case of NCBI assembly for human genome. We have developed a method, using total frequency distribution of all r-bp key strings in dependence on the fragment length l, to determine the exact size of all repeats within the given genomic sequence, both of monomeric and HOR type. Subsequently, for particular fragment lengths equal to each of these repeat sizes we compute the partial frequency distribution of r-bp key strings; the key string with highest frequency is a dominant key string, optimal for segmentation of a given genomic sequence into repeat units. We illustrate how a wide class of 3-bp key strings leads to a key-string-dependent periodic cell which enables a simple identification and consensus length determinations of HORs, or any other highly convergent repeat of monomeric or HOR type, both tandem or dispersed. We illustrated KSA application for HORs in human genome and determined consensus HORs in the Build 35.1 assembly. In the next step we compute suprachromosomal family classification and CENP-B box / pJalpha distributions for HORs. In the case of less convergent repeats, like for example monomeric alpha satellite (20-40% divergence), we searched for optimal compact key string using frequency method and developed a concept of composite key string (GAAAC--CTTTG) or flexible relaxation (28 bp key string) which provides both monomeric alpha satellites as well as alpha monomer segmentation of internal HOR structure. This method is convenient also for study of R-strand (direct) / S-strand (reverse complement) alpha monomer alternations. Using KSA we identified 16 alternating regions of R-strand and S-strand monomers in one contig in choromosome 7. Use of CENP-B box and/or pJalpha motif as key string is suitable both for identification of HORs and monomeric pattern as well as for studies of CENP-B box / pJalpha distribution. As an example of application of KSA to sequences outside of HOR regions we present our finding of a tandem with highly convergent 3434-bp Long monomer in chromosome 5 (divergence less then 0.3%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Paar
- Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Bijenička 32, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ivan Basar
- Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Bijenička 32, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marija Rosandić
- Department of Internal Medicine,
University Hospital Rebro, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Matko Glunčić
- Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Bijenička 32, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shaffer LG, Bejjani BA. Medical applications of array CGH and the transformation of clinical cytogenetics. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 115:303-9. [PMID: 17124414 DOI: 10.1159/000095928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2006] [Accepted: 05/02/2006] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) merges molecular diagnostics with traditional chromosome analysis and is transforming the field of cytogenetics. Prospective studies of individuals with developmental delay and dysmorphic features have demonstrated that array CGH has the ability to detect any genomic imbalance including deletions, duplications, aneuploidies and amplifications. Detection rates for chromosome abnormalities with array CGH range from 5-17% in individuals with normal results from prior routine cytogenetic testing. In addition, copy number variants (CNVs) were identified in all studies. These CNVs may include large-scale variation and can confound the diagnostic interpretations. Although cytogeneticists will require additional training and laboratories must become appropriately equipped, array CGH holds the promise of being the initial diagnostic tool in the identification of visible and submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities in mental retardation and other developmental disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L G Shaffer
- Signature Genomic Laboratories, LLC, Spokane, WA 99204, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
In research as well as in clinical applications, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has gained increasing popularity as a highly sensitive technique to study cytogenetic changes. Today, hundreds of commercially available DNA probes serve the basic needs of the biomedical research community. Widespread applications, however, are often limited by the lack of appropriately labeled, specific nucleic acid probes. We describe two approaches for an expeditious preparation of chromosome-specific DNAs and the subsequent probe labeling with reporter molecules of choice. The described techniques allow the preparation of highly specific DNA repeat probes suitable for enumeration of chromosomes in interphase cell nuclei or tissue sections. In addition, there is no need for chromosome enrichment by flow cytometry and sorting or molecular cloning. Our PCR-based method uses either bacterial artificial chromosomes or human genomic DNA as templates with alpha-satellite-specific primers. Here we demonstrate the production of fluorochrome-labeled DNA repeat probes specific for human chromosomes 17 and 18 in just a few days without the need for highly specialized equipment and without the limitation to only a few fluorochrome labels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adolf Baumgartner
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, CA 94720, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Roberts KA, Martineau M, Broadfield ZJ, Gibson BES, Harewood L, Stewart J, Harrison CJ. A diminutive chromosome 21 centromere in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 167:78-81. [PMID: 16682292 DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2005.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2005] [Revised: 10/14/2005] [Accepted: 10/17/2005] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
A chance observation of a tiny constitutional variant for the centromere of chromosome 21 in two patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), suggested a possible correlation with the cytogenetic findings in their leukemic cells. Interphase FISH revealed three 13/21 centromeric signals and a single MLL signal in the blast cells of each patient. Metaphase FISH with dual-color application of whole-chromosome paint (wcp) and centromeric probes for chromosome 21 showed two copies of chromosome 21, one with a tiny centromeric signal which corresponded to the invisible centromere in the interphase cells. Patient 2700 had a normal karyotype in his bone marrow at diagnosis. All metaphases from his stimulated peripheral blood also had the tiny chromosome 21 centromere, proving it to be a constitutional variant. Patient 3314 showed the abnormal karyotype 46,XY,inv(1)(p?q?),del(11)(q?),del(12)(p?),inc in his bone marrow. Interphase FISH revealed only one copy each of the ABL and ETV6 genes, in addition to the loss of the MLL signal. The question arises, is there an association between the diminutive centromeric signals for chromosome 21 and the chromosomal instability demonstrated by the deletions of key genes from the leukemic blasts of these two patients?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn A Roberts
- LRF Cytogenetics Group, Cancer Sciences Division, University of Southampton, MP 822, Duthie Building, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Roizès G. Human centromeric alphoid domains are periodically homogenized so that they vary substantially between homologues. Mechanism and implications for centromere functioning. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:1912-24. [PMID: 16598075 PMCID: PMC1447651 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Sequence analysis of alphoid repeats from human chromosomes 17, 21 and 13 reveals recurrent diagnostic variant nucleotides. Their combinations define haplotypes, with higher order repeats (HORs) containing identical or closely-related haplotypes tandemly arranged into separate domains. The haplotypes found on homologues can be totally different, while HORs remain 99.8% homogeneous both intrachromosomally and between homologues. These results support the hypothesis, never before demonstrated, that unequal crossovers between sister chromatids accumulate to produce homogenization and amplification into tandem alphoid repeats. I propose that the molecular basis of this involves the diagnostic variant nucleotides, which enable pairing between HORs with identical or closely-related haplotypes. Domains are thus periodically renewed to maintain high intrachromosomal and interhomologue homogeneity. The capacity of a domain to form an active centromere is maintained as long as neither retrotransposons nor significant numbers of mutations affect it. In the presented model, a chromosome with an altered centromere can be transiently rescued by forming a neocentromere, until a restored, fully-competent domain is amplified de novo or rehomogenized through the accumulation of unequal crossovers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gérard Roizès
- Institut de Génétique Humaine, UPR 1142, CNRS, 141 Rue de la Cardonille, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hasterok R, Dulawa J, Jenkins G, Leggett M, Langdon T. Multi-substrate chromosome preparations for high throughput comparative FISH. BMC Biotechnol 2006; 6:20. [PMID: 16549000 PMCID: PMC1481663 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-6-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2005] [Accepted: 03/20/2006] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A modification of a standard method of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) is described, by which a combination of several substrates and probes on single microscope slides enables more accurate comparisons of the distribution and abundance of chromosomal sequences and improves the relatively low throughput of standard FISH methods. RESULTS The utility and application of multi-colour, multi-substrate FISH is illustrated by the simultaneous physical mapping of retrotransposon sequences to three species of Avena, and single locus BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) clones and rDNA probes to three species of Brachypodium, demonstrating how this would enable better understanding of complex phylogenetic relationships among some of the species belonging to these two genera. CONCLUSION The results show that use of multi-substrate chromosome preparations significantly increases the utility of FISH in comparative analyses of the distribution and abundance of chromosomal sequences in closely related plant species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Hasterok
- Department of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland
| | - Joanna Dulawa
- Department of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland
| | - Glyn Jenkins
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Edward Llwyd Building, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Penglais, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3DA, UK
| | - Mike Leggett
- Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EB, UK
| | - Tim Langdon
- Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies that are derived from mesenchymal cells, which under normal circumstances lead to the development of connective tissues such as bone, muscle, fat, and cartilage. During the past decade, insight has been gained regarding the aberrancies that occur during normal development that result in mesenchymal cells transforming into sarcomas. More recently, these insights have led to the development of successful therapies that target the specific mechanisms inherent to individual sarcomas. This overview discusses some of the aberrant molecular mechanisms shared in sarcomas and reviews several sarcoma subtypes in which the most advances have been made. Finally, the ways in which these advances in basic science are translating into and redefining clinical practice are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Matushansky
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pellestor F, Anahory T, Hamamah S. The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 11:15-32. [PMID: 15569701 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmh051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The cytogenetic survey of mature human oocytes has been and remains a subject of great interest because of the prevalence of aneuploidy of maternal origin in abnormal human conceptuses, and the lack of understanding about the non-disjunction processes in human meiosis. The first attempts to analyse the chromosomal content of human female gametes were made in the early 1970s, and led to limited data because of the paucity of materials and the inadequacy of the procedure used. The years to follow brought a resurgence of interest in this field, because of the development of human IVF techniques which made oocytes unfertilized in vitro available for cytogenetic analysis. Numerous studies have since been performed. However, the difficulties in obtaining good chromosome preparations and of performing accurate chromosome identification have reduced the viability of these studies, resulting in large variations in the reported incidences of chromosomal abnormalities. The further introduction of new procedures for oocyte fixation and the screening of large oocyte samples have allowed more reliable data to be obtained and to identify premature chromatid separation as a major mechanism in aneuploidy occurrence. The last decade has been privileged to witness the adaptation of molecular cytogenetic techniques to human oocytes, and thus various powerful procedures have been tried not only on female gametes, but also on polar bodies, involving sequential and multicolour fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) labelling, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), spectral karyotyping and alternative methods such as primed in situ labelling (PRINS) and peptide nucleic acid (PNA) techniques. A large body of data has been obtained, but these studies also display a great variability in the frequency of abnormalities, which may be essentially attributable to the technical limitations of these in situ methods when applied to human oocytes. However, molecular cytogenetic approaches have also evidenced the co-existence of both whole chromosome non-disjunction and chromatid separation in maternal aneuploidy. In addition, the extension of these techniques to oocyte polar body materials has provided additional data on the mechanism of meiotic malsegregation. Improvements of some of these techniques have already been reported. The further development of new approaches for the in situ analysis of human meiosis will increase the impact of cytogenetic investigation of human oocytes in the understanding of aneuploidy processes in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Pellestor
- CNRS UPR 1142, Institute of Human Genetics, 141 rue de la Cardonille, F-34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Krzywinski J, Sangaré D, Besansky NJ. Satellite DNA from the Y chromosome of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Genetics 2004; 169:185-96. [PMID: 15466420 PMCID: PMC1448884 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.034264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Satellite DNA is an enigmatic component of genomic DNA with unclear function that has been regarded as "junk." Yet, persistence of these tandem highly repetitive sequences in heterochromatic regions of most eukaryotic chromosomes attests to their importance in the genome. We explored the Anopheles gambiae genome for the presence of satellite repeats and identified 12 novel satellite DNA families. Certain families were found in close juxtaposition within the genome. Six satellites, falling into two evolutionarily linked groups, were investigated in detail. Four of them were experimentally confirmed to be linked to the Y chromosome, whereas their relatives occupy centromeric regions of either the X chromosome or the autosomes. A complex evolutionary pattern was revealed among the AgY477-like satellites, suggesting their rapid turnover in the A. gambiae complex and, potentially, recombination between sex chromosomes. The substitution pattern suggested rolling circle replication as an array expansion mechanism in the Y-linked 53-bp satellite families. Despite residing in different portions of the genome, the 53-bp satellites share the same monomer lengths, apparently maintained by molecular drive or structural constraints. Potential functional centromeric DNA structures, consisting of twofold dyad symmetries flanked by a common sequence motif, have been identified in both satellite groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaroslaw Krzywinski
- Center for Tropical Disease Research and Training, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The complete sequence of rice centromere 8 reveals a small amount of centromere-specific satellite sequence in blocks interrupted by retrotransposons and other repetitive DNA, in an arrangement that is similar in size and content to other centromeres of multicellular eukaryotes. The complete sequence of rice centromere 8 reveals a small amount of centromere-specific satellite sequence in blocks interrupted by retrotransposons and other repetitive DNA, in an arrangement that is strikingly similar in overall size and content to other centromeres of multicellular eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan C Lamb
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
| | - James Theuri
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
| | - James A Birchler
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Maternal ageing is the only etiological factor unequivocally associated with the occurrence of aneuploid conceptuses. Molecular studies of trisomies have demonstrated that the pattern of recombinaison was an important predisposing factor to meiotic nondisjunction. To complete this data, a large chromosomal study has been undertaken on 1,397 unfertilised human oocytes recovered from women participating in in vitro fertilization programmes. Conventional whole chromosome nondisjunction and premature chromatid separation were the major types of numerical abnormalities observed. A positive relationship was found between maternal age and these two types of nondisjunction, but the most significant correlation was observed with chromatid separation resulting in the presence of free chromatid in metaphase II oocyte. These data revealed that chromatid separation was an essential factor in the age-dependent occurrence of aneuploidy. This finding provided new insights into the mechanism of nondisjunction in female meiosis since disturbance in molecular chromatid cohesion by cohesins might be a causal mechanism predisposing to nondisjunction and involved in the maternal age effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franck Pellestor
- Institut de Génétique humaine, CNRS UPR 1142, 141, rue de la Cardonille, 34396 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Amor DJ, Bentley K, Ryan J, Perry J, Wong L, Slater H, Choo KHA. Human centromere repositioning "in progress". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:6542-7. [PMID: 15084747 PMCID: PMC404081 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0308637101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2003] [Accepted: 03/12/2004] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Centromere repositioning provides a potentially powerful evolutionary force for reproductive isolation and speciation, but the underlying mechanisms remain ill-defined. An attractive model is through the simultaneous inactivation of a normal centromere and the formation of a new centromere at a hitherto noncentromeric chromosomal location with minimal detrimental effect. We report a two-generation family in which the centromeric activity of one chromosome 4 has been relocated to a euchromatic site at 4q21.3 through the epigenetic formation of a neocentromere in otherwise cytogenetically normal and mitotically stable karyotypes. Strong epigenetic inactivation of the original centromere is suggested by retention of 1.3 megabases of centromeric alpha-satellite DNA, absence of detectable molecular alteration in chromosome 4-centromereproximal p- and q-arm sequences, and failure of the inactive centromere to be reactivated through extensive culturing or treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. The neocentromere binds functionally essential centromere proteins (CENP-A, CENP-C, CENP-E, CENP-I, BUB1, and HP1), although a moderate reduction in CENP-A binding and sister-chromatid cohesion compared with the typical centromeres suggests possible underlying structural/functional differences. The stable mitotic and meiotic transmissibility of this pseudodicentric-neocentric chromosome in healthy individuals and the ability of the neocentric activity to form in a euchromatic site in preference to a preexisting alphoid domain provide direct evidence for an inherent mechanism of human centromere repositioning and karyotype evolution "in progress." We discuss the wider implication of such a mechanism for meiotic drive and the evolution of primate and other species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Amor
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute and Department of Paediatrics, Genetic Health Services Victoria, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Podgornaya OI, Voronin AP, Enukashvily NI, Matveev IV, Lobov IB. Structure-specific DNA-binding proteins as the foundation for three-dimensional chromatin organization. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CYTOLOGY 2003; 224:227-96. [PMID: 12722952 DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7696(05)24006-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Any functions of tandem repetitive sequences need proteins that specifically bind to them. Telomere-binding TRF2/MTBP attaches telomeres to the nuclear envelope in interphase due to its rod-domain-like motif. Interphase nuclei organized as a number of sponge-like ruffly round chromosome territories that could be rotated from outside. SAF-A/hnRNP-U and p68-helicase are proteins suitable to do that. Their location in the interchromosome territory space, ATPase domains, and the ability to be bound by satellite DNAs (satDNA) make them part of the wires used to help chromosome territory rotates. In case of active transcription p68-helicase can be involved in the formation of local "gene expression matrices" and due to its satDNA-binding specificity cause the rearrangement of the local chromosome territory. The marks of chromatin rearrangement, which have to be heritable, could be provided by SAF-A/hnRNP-U. During telophase unfolding the proper chromatin arrangement is restored according to these marks. The structural specificity of both proteins to the satDNAs provides a regulative but relatively stable mode of binding. The structural specificity of protein binding could help to find the "magic" centromeric sequence. With future investigations of proteins with the structural specificity of binding during early embryogenesis, when heterochromatin formation goes on, the molecular mechanisms of the "gene gating" hypothesis (Blobel, 1985) will be confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O I Podgornaya
- Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Spence JM, Critcher R, Ebersole TA, Valdivia MM, Earnshaw WC, Fukagawa T, Farr CJ. Co-localization of centromere activity, proteins and topoisomerase II within a subdomain of the major human X alpha-satellite array. EMBO J 2002; 21:5269-80. [PMID: 12356743 PMCID: PMC129033 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdf511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Dissection of human centromeres is difficult because of the lack of landmarks within highly repeated DNA. We have systematically manipulated a single human X centromere generating a large series of deletion derivatives, which have been examined at four levels: linear DNA structure; the distribution of constitutive centromere proteins; topoisomerase IIalpha cleavage activity; and mitotic stability. We have determined that the human X major alpha-satellite locus, DXZ1, is asymmetrically organized with an active subdomain anchored approximately 150 kb in from the Xp-edge. We demonstrate a major site of topoisomerase II cleavage within this domain that can shift if juxtaposed with a telomere, suggesting that this enzyme recognizes an epigenetic determinant within the DXZ1 chromatin. The observation that the only part of the DXZ1 locus shared by all deletion derivatives is a highly restricted region of <50 kb, which coincides with the topo isomerase II cleavage site, together with the high levels of cleavage detected, identify topoisomerase II as a major player in centromere biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Thomas A. Ebersole
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH,
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK, Laboratory of Biosystems and Cancer Genome Structure and Function Section, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 49, Room 4A56, Bethesda, MD 20892-4471, USA, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain and PRESTO of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation, National Institute of Genetics and Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan Corresponding author e-mail:
| | - Manuel M. Valdivia
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH,
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK, Laboratory of Biosystems and Cancer Genome Structure and Function Section, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 49, Room 4A56, Bethesda, MD 20892-4471, USA, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain and PRESTO of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation, National Institute of Genetics and Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan Corresponding author e-mail:
| | - William C. Earnshaw
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH,
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK, Laboratory of Biosystems and Cancer Genome Structure and Function Section, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 49, Room 4A56, Bethesda, MD 20892-4471, USA, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain and PRESTO of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation, National Institute of Genetics and Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan Corresponding author e-mail:
| | - Tatsuo Fukagawa
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH,
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK, Laboratory of Biosystems and Cancer Genome Structure and Function Section, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 49, Room 4A56, Bethesda, MD 20892-4471, USA, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain and PRESTO of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation, National Institute of Genetics and Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan Corresponding author e-mail:
| | - Christine J. Farr
- Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH,
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK, Laboratory of Biosystems and Cancer Genome Structure and Function Section, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 49, Room 4A56, Bethesda, MD 20892-4471, USA, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Cadiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain and PRESTO of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation, National Institute of Genetics and Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan Corresponding author e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lo AWI, Sprung CN, Fouladi B, Pedram M, Sabatier L, Ricoul M, Reynolds GE, Murnane JP. Chromosome instability as a result of double-strand breaks near telomeres in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:4836-50. [PMID: 12052890 PMCID: PMC133890 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.22.13.4836-4850.2002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Telomeres are essential for protecting the ends of chromosomes and preventing chromosome fusion. Telomere loss has been proposed to play an important role in the chromosomal rearrangements associated with tumorigenesis. To determine the relationship between telomere loss and chromosome instability in mammalian cells, we investigated the events resulting from the introduction of a double-strand break near a telomere with I-SceI endonuclease in mouse embryonic stem cells. The inactivation of a selectable marker gene adjacent to a telomere as a result of the I-SceI-induced double-strand break involved either the addition of a telomere at the site of the break or the formation of inverted repeats and large tandem duplications on the end of the chromosome. Nucleotide sequence analysis demonstrated large deletions and little or no complementarity at the recombination sites involved in the formation of the inverted repeats. The formation of inverted repeats was followed by a period of chromosome instability, characterized by amplification of the subtelomeric region, translocation of chromosomal fragments onto the end of the chromosome, and the formation of dicentric chromosomes. Despite this heterogeneity, the rearranged chromosomes eventually acquired telomeres and were stable in most of the cells in the population at the time of analysis. Our observations are consistent with a model in which broken chromosomes that do not regain a telomere undergo sister chromatid fusion involving nonhomologous end joining. Sister chromatid fusion is followed by chromosome instability resulting from breakage-fusion-bridge cycles involving the sister chromatids and rearrangements with other chromosomes. This process results in highly rearranged chromosomes that eventually become stable through the addition of a telomere onto the broken end. We have observed similar events after spontaneous telomere loss in a human tumor cell line, suggesting that chromosome instability resulting from telomere loss plays a role in chromosomal rearrangements associated with tumor cell progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony W. I. Lo
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Carl N. Sprung
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Bijan Fouladi
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Mehrdad Pedram
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Laure Sabatier
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Michelle Ricoul
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Gloria E. Reynolds
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - John P. Murnane
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie et Oncologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
- Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, 1855 Folsom St., MCB 200, San Francisco, CA 94103. Phone: (415) 476-9083. Fax: (415) 476-9069. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tsuchiya K, Schueler MG, Dev VG. Familial X centromere variant resulting in false-positive prenatal diagnosis of monosomy X by interphase FISH. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21:852-5. [PMID: 11746128 DOI: 10.1002/pd.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis performed on uncultured amniotic fluid cells from a female fetus revealed a single signal using an X chromosome alpha-satellite probe, and the absence of any signal using a Y chromosome alpha-satellite probe. This result was initially interpreted as monosomy for the X chromosome in the fetus. Subsequent chromosome analysis from the cultured amniotic fluid cells showed two apparently normal X chromosomes. FISH using the X alpha-satellite probe on metaphase spreads revealed hybridization to both X chromosomes, although one signal was markedly reduced compared to the other. The same hybridization pattern was observed in the mother of the fetus. This is the first report of a rare familial X centromere variant resulting in a false-positive diagnosis of monosomy X by interphase FISH analysis for prenatal diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Tsuchiya
- Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-2561, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Recent data indicate that the eukaryotic centromere and pericentromeric regions are organized into definable functional and structural domains. Studies in different organisms point to a model of conserved pattern of organization for these domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H Choo
- The Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
The properties that define centromeres in complex eukaryotes are poorly understood because the underlying DNA is normally repetitive and indistinguishable from surrounding noncentromeric sequences. However, centromeric chromatin contains variant H3-like histones that may specify centromeric regions. Nucleosomes are normally assembled during DNA replication; therefore, we examined replication and chromatin assembly at centromeres in Drosophila cells. DNA in pericentric heterochromatin replicates late in S phase, and so centromeres are also thought to replicate late. In contrast to expectation, we show that centromeres replicate as isolated domains early in S phase. These domains do not appear to assemble conventional H3-containing nucleosomes, and deposition of the Cid centromeric H3-like variant proceeds by a replication-independent pathway. We suggest that late-replicating pericentric heterochromatin helps to maintain embedded centromeres by blocking conventional nucleosome assembly early in S phase, thereby allowing the deposition of centromeric histones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kami Ahmad
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109
| | - Steven Henikoff
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Goobie S, Popovic M, Morrison J, Ellis L, Ginzberg H, Boocock GRB, Ehtesham N, Bétard C, Brewer CG, Roslin NM, Hudson TJ, Morgan K, Fujiwara TM, Durie PR, Rommens JM. Shwachman-Diamond syndrome with exocrine pancreatic dysfunction and bone marrow failure maps to the centromeric region of chromosome 7. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68:1048-54. [PMID: 11254457 PMCID: PMC1275624 DOI: 10.1086/319505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2000] [Accepted: 01/18/2001] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and hematologic and skeletal abnormalities. A genomewide scan of families with SDS was terminated at approximately 50% completion, with the identification of chromosome 7 markers that showed linkage with the disease. Finer mapping revealed significant linkage across a broad interval that included the centromere. The maximum two-point LOD score was 8.7, with D7S473, at a recombination fraction of 0. The maximum multipoint LOD score was 10, in the interval between D7S499 and D7S482 (5.4 cM on the female map and 0 cM on the male map), a region delimited by recombinant events detected in affected children. Evidence from all 15 of the multiplex families analyzed provided support for the linkage, consistent with a single locus for SDS. However, the presence of several different mutations is suggested by the heterogeneity of disease-associated haplotypes in the candidate region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharan Goobie
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Maja Popovic
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Jodi Morrison
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Lynda Ellis
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Hedy Ginzberg
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Graeme R. B. Boocock
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Nadia Ehtesham
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Christine Bétard
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Carl G. Brewer
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Nicole M. Roslin
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Thomas J. Hudson
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Kenneth Morgan
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - T. Mary Fujiwara
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Peter R. Durie
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| | - Johanna M. Rommens
- Programs in Genetics and Genomic Biology and Integrative Biology, Research Institute, and Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto; and Montreal Genome Centre, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, and Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Floridia G, Zatterale A, Zuffardi O, Tyler-Smith C. Mapping of a human centromere onto the DNA by topoisomerase II cleavage. EMBO Rep 2000; 1:489-93. [PMID: 11263492 PMCID: PMC1083782 DOI: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We have mapped the positions of topoisomerase II binding sites at the centromere of the human Y chromosome using etoposide-mediated DNA cleavage. A single region of cleavage is seen at normal centromeres, spanning approximately 50 kb within the centromeric alphoid array, but this pattern is abolished at two inactive centromeres. It therefore provides a marker for the position of the active centromere. Although the underlying centromeric DNA structure is variable, the position of the centromere measured in this way is fixed relative to the Yp edge of the array, and has retained the same position for >100,000 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Floridia
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
O'Keefe CL, Matera AG. Alpha satellite DNA variant-specific oligoprobes differing by a single base can distinguish chromosome 15 homologs. Genome Res 2000; 10:1342-50. [PMID: 10984452 DOI: 10.1101/gr.10.9.1342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The ability to distinguish homologous chromosomes is a powerful cytogenetic tool. However, traditional techniques can only distinguish extreme physical variants and are highly dependent on sample preparation. We have previously reported oligonucleotide probes, specific for human chromosome 17 alpha satellite DNA sequence variants, that distinguish cytogenetically normal homologous chromosomes by FISH. Here we report the development of similar oligoprobes, differing at a single nucleotide position, that not only distinguish homologous chromosomes 15 but can be used to follow the transmission of a chromosome from parents to their offspring. We also identified a novel array-size polymorphism in another family. The alphoid array of one chromosome is quite small and below the detection threshold for our oligoprobes, although it is detectable by conventional FISH probes. This size polymorphism provides an additional FISH-based method for distinguishing homologs. Most importantly, this work illustrates the potential applicability of the technique to the entire human chromosome complement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L O'Keefe
- Department of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|