1
|
Nicotra R, Lutz C, Messal HA, Jonkers J. Rat Models of Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2024; 29:12. [PMID: 38913216 PMCID: PMC11196369 DOI: 10.1007/s10911-024-09566-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of breast cancer among women worldwide, accounting for 70-80% of all invasive cases. Patients with HR+ BC are commonly treated with endocrine therapy, but intrinsic or acquired resistance is a frequent problem, making HR+ BC a focal point of intense research. Despite this, the malignancy still lacks adequate in vitro and in vivo models for the study of its initiation and progression as well as response and resistance to endocrine therapy. No mouse models that fully mimic the human disease are available, however rat mammary tumor models pose a promising alternative to overcome this limitation. Compared to mice, rats are more similar to humans in terms of mammary gland architecture, ductal origin of neoplastic lesions and hormone dependency status. Moreover, rats can develop spontaneous or induced mammary tumors that resemble human HR+ BC. To date, six different types of rat models of HR+ BC have been established. These include the spontaneous, carcinogen-induced, transplantation, hormone-induced, radiation-induced and genetically engineered rat mammary tumor models. Each model has distinct advantages, disadvantages and utility for studying HR+ BC. This review provides a comprehensive overview of all published models to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Nicotra
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Catrin Lutz
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Hendrik A Messal
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Jos Jonkers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bulanova D, Akimov Y, Senkowski W, Oikkonen J, Gall-Mas L, Timonen S, Elmadani M, Hynninen J, Hautaniemi S, Aittokallio T, Wennerberg K. A synthetic lethal dependency on casein kinase 2 in response to replication-perturbing therapeutics in RB1-deficient cancer cells. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadj1564. [PMID: 38781347 PMCID: PMC11114247 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj1564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Resistance to therapy commonly develops in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), urging the search for improved therapeutic combinations and their predictive biomarkers. Starting from a CRISPR knockout screen, we identified that loss of RB1 in TNBC or HGSC cells generates a synthetic lethal dependency on casein kinase 2 (CK2) for surviving the treatment with replication-perturbing therapeutics such as carboplatin, gemcitabine, or PARP inhibitors. CK2 inhibition in RB1-deficient cells resulted in the degradation of another RB family cell cycle regulator, p130, which led to S phase accumulation, micronuclei formation, and accelerated PARP inhibition-induced aneuploidy and mitotic cell death. CK2 inhibition was also effective in primary patient-derived cells. It selectively prevented the regrowth of RB1-deficient patient HGSC organoids after treatment with carboplatin or niraparib. As about 25% of HGSCs and 40% of TNBCs have lost RB1 expression, CK2 inhibition is a promising approach to overcome resistance to standard therapeutics in large strata of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Bulanova
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute for Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Yevhen Akimov
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute for Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Wojciech Senkowski
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jaana Oikkonen
- Research Program in Systems Oncology (ONCOSYS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Laura Gall-Mas
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sanna Timonen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute for Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Johanna Hynninen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Sampsa Hautaniemi
- Research Program in Systems Oncology (ONCOSYS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tero Aittokallio
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute for Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Institute for Cancer Research, Department of Cancer Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology (OCBE), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Krister Wennerberg
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Casasent AK, Almekinders MM, Mulder C, Bhattacharjee P, Collyar D, Thompson AM, Jonkers J, Lips EH, van Rheenen J, Hwang ES, Nik-Zainal S, Navin NE, Wesseling J. Learning to distinguish progressive and non-progressive ductal carcinoma in situ. Nat Rev Cancer 2022; 22:663-678. [PMID: 36261705 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-022-00512-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast neoplasia that accounts for 25% of all screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed annually. Neoplastic cells in DCIS are confined to the ductal system of the breast, although they can escape and progress to invasive breast cancer in a subset of patients. A key concern of DCIS is overtreatment, as most patients screened for DCIS and in whom DCIS is diagnosed will not go on to exhibit symptoms or die of breast cancer, even if left untreated. However, differentiating low-risk, indolent DCIS from potentially progressive DCIS remains challenging. In this Review, we summarize our current knowledge of DCIS and explore open questions about the basic biology of DCIS, including those regarding how genomic events in neoplastic cells and the surrounding microenvironment contribute to the progression of DCIS to invasive breast cancer. Further, we discuss what information will be needed to prevent overtreatment of indolent DCIS lesions without compromising adequate treatment for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Casasent
- Department of Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Charlotta Mulder
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jos Jonkers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacco van Rheenen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Serena Nik-Zainal
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicholas E Navin
- Department of Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Bioinformatics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Metastasis is a major contributor to cancer-associated deaths. It is characterized by a multistep process that occurs through the acquisition of molecular and phenotypic changes enabling cancer cells from a primary tumour to disseminate and colonize at distant organ sites. Over the past decade, the discovery and characterization of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have revealed the diversity of their regulatory roles, including key contributions throughout the metastatic cascade. Here, we review how lncRNAs promote metastasis by functioning in discrete pro-metastatic steps including the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion and migration and organotrophic colonization, and by influencing the metastatic tumour microenvironment, often by interacting within ribonucleoprotein complexes or directly with other nucleic acid entities. We discuss well-characterized lncRNAs with in vivo phenotypes and highlight mechanistic commonalities such as convergence with the TGFβ-ZEB1/ZEB2 axis or the nuclear factor-κB pathway, in addition to lncRNAs with controversial mechanisms and the influence of methodologies on mechanistic interpretation. Furthermore, some lncRNAs can help identify tumours with increased metastatic risk and spur novel therapeutic strategies, with several lncRNAs having shown potential as novel targets for antisense oligonucleotide therapy in animal models. In addition to well-characterized examples of lncRNAs functioning in metastasis, we discuss controversies and ongoing challenges in lncRNA biology. Finally, we present areas for future study for this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S John Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ha X Dang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Daniel A Lim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher A Maher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tarsounas M, Sung P. The antitumorigenic roles of BRCA1-BARD1 in DNA repair and replication. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020; 21:284-299. [PMID: 32094664 PMCID: PMC7204409 DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-0218-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The tumour suppressor breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) promotes DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination and protects DNA replication forks from attrition. BRCA1 partners with BRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 (BARD1) and other tumour suppressor proteins to mediate the initial nucleolytic resection of DNA lesions and the recruitment and regulation of the recombinase RAD51. The discovery of the opposing functions of BRCA1 and the p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1)-associated complex in DNA resection sheds light on how BRCA1 influences the choice of homologous recombination over non-homologous end joining and potentially other mutagenic pathways of DSB repair. Understanding the functional crosstalk between BRCA1-BARD1 and its cofactors and antagonists will illuminate the molecular basis of cancers that arise from a deficiency or misregulation of chromosome damage repair and replication fork maintenance. Such knowledge will also be valuable for understanding acquired tumour resistance to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and other therapeutics and for the development of new treatments. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in elucidating the mechanisms by which BRCA1-BARD1 functions in DNA repair, replication fork maintenance and tumour suppression, and its therapeutic relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madalena Tarsounas
- Genome Stability and Tumourigenesis Group, Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Patrick Sung
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Testa U, Castelli G, Pelosi E. Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments. Med Sci (Basel) 2020; 8:E18. [PMID: 32210163 PMCID: PMC7151639 DOI: 10.3390/medsci8010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer in women. There were over two-million new cases in world in 2018. It is the second leading cause of death from cancer in western countries. At the molecular level, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, which is characterized by high genomic instability evidenced by somatic gene mutations, copy number alterations, and chromosome structural rearrangements. The genomic instability is caused by defects in DNA damage repair, transcription, DNA replication, telomere maintenance and mitotic chromosome segregation. According to molecular features, breast cancers are subdivided in subtypes, according to activation of hormone receptors (estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor), of human epidermal growth factors receptor 2 (HER2), and or BRCA mutations. In-depth analyses of the molecular features of primary and metastatic breast cancer have shown the great heterogeneity of genetic alterations and their clonal evolution during disease development. These studies have contributed to identify a repertoire of numerous disease-causing genes that are altered through different mutational processes. While early-stage breast cancer is a curable disease in about 70% of patients, advanced breast cancer is largely incurable. However, molecular studies have contributed to develop new therapeutic approaches targeting HER2, CDK4/6, PI3K, or involving poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for BRCA mutation carriers and immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Testa
- Department of Oncology, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.C.); (E.P.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gogola E, Rottenberg S, Jonkers J. Resistance to PARP Inhibitors: Lessons from Preclinical Models of BRCA-Associated Cancer. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CANCER BIOLOGY 2019; 3:235-254. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030617-050232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) have recently entered the clinic for the treatment of homologous recombination–deficient cancers. Despite the success of this approach, resistance to PARP inhibitors (PARPis) is a clinical hurdle, and it is poorly understood how cancer cells escape the deadly effects of PARPis without restoring BRCA1/2 function. By synergizing the advantages of next-generation sequencing with functional genetic screens in tractable model systems, novel mechanisms providing useful insights into DNA damage response (DDR) have been identified. BRCA1/2 models not only are tools to explore therapy escape mechanisms but also yield basic knowledge about DDR pathways and PARPis’ mechanism of action. Moreover, alterations that render cells resistant to targeted therapies may cause new synthetic dependencies that can be exploited to combat resistant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Gogola
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, 3521 AL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sven Rottenberg
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jos Jonkers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Genomics Centre Netherlands, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, 3521 AL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gogola E, Duarte AA, de Ruiter JR, Wiegant WW, Schmid JA, de Bruijn R, James DI, Guerrero Llobet S, Vis DJ, Annunziato S, van den Broek B, Barazas M, Kersbergen A, van de Ven M, Tarsounas M, Ogilvie DJ, van Vugt M, Wessels LFA, Bartkova J, Gromova I, Andújar-Sánchez M, Bartek J, Lopes M, van Attikum H, Borst P, Jonkers J, Rottenberg S. Selective Loss of PARG Restores PARylation and Counteracts PARP Inhibitor-Mediated Synthetic Lethality. Cancer Cell 2018; 33:1078-1093.e12. [PMID: 29894693 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymerase (PARPi) have recently entered the clinic for the treatment of homologous recombination (HR)-deficient cancers. Despite the success of this approach, drug resistance is a clinical hurdle, and we poorly understand how cancer cells escape the deadly effects of PARPi without restoring the HR pathway. By combining genetic screens with multi-omics analysis of matched PARPi-sensitive and -resistant Brca2-mutated mouse mammary tumors, we identified loss of PAR glycohydrolase (PARG) as a major resistance mechanism. We also found the presence of PARG-negative clones in a subset of human serous ovarian and triple-negative breast cancers. PARG depletion restores PAR formation and partially rescues PARP1 signaling. Importantly, PARG inactivation exposes vulnerabilities that can be exploited therapeutically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Gogola
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Alexandra A Duarte
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Julian R de Ruiter
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter W Wiegant
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands
| | - Jonas A Schmid
- Institute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zurich, Zurich CH-8057, Switzerland
| | - Roebi de Bruijn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Dominic I James
- Drug Discovery Unit, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Sergi Guerrero Llobet
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9723GZ, the Netherlands
| | - Daniel J Vis
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Stefano Annunziato
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Bram van den Broek
- Division of Cell Biology and BioImaging Facility, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Barazas
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Ariena Kersbergen
- Division of Molecular Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke van de Ven
- Mouse Clinic for Cancer and Aging (MCCA), Preclinical Intervention Unit, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Madalena Tarsounas
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Donald J Ogilvie
- Drug Discovery Unit, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Marcel van Vugt
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9723GZ, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Jirina Bartkova
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark; Karolinska Institute, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Division of Genome Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden
| | - Irina Gromova
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| | - Miguel Andújar-Sánchez
- Pathology Department, Complejo Hospt. Univ. Insular Materno Infantil, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Jiri Bartek
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark; Karolinska Institute, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Division of Genome Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden
| | - Massimo Lopes
- Institute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zurich, Zurich CH-8057, Switzerland
| | - Haico van Attikum
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333 ZC, the Netherlands
| | - Piet Borst
- Division of Molecular Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Jos Jonkers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| | - Sven Rottenberg
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands; Institute of Animal Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern 3012, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
BRCA-deficient mouse mammary tumor organoids to study cancer-drug resistance. Nat Methods 2017; 15:134-140. [PMID: 29256493 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition (PARPi) is a promising new therapeutic approach for the treatment of cancers that show homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Despite the success of PARPi in targeting HRD in tumors that lack the tumor suppressor function of BRCA1 or BRCA2, drug resistance poses a major obstacle. We developed three-dimensional cancer organoids derived from genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) for BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cancers. Unlike conventional cell lines or mammospheres, organoid cultures can be efficiently derived and rapidly expanded in vitro. Orthotopically transplanted organoids give rise to mammary tumors that recapitulate the epithelial morphology and preserve the drug response of the original tumor. Notably, GEMM-tumor-derived organoids can be easily genetically modified, making them a powerful tool for genetic studies of tumor biology and drug resistance.
Collapse
|