1
|
Claessens JL, Wanten JC, Bauer NJ, Nuijts RM, Vrijman V, Selek E, Wouters RJ, Reus NJ, van Dorst FJ, Findl O, Ruiss M, Boden K, Januschowski K, Imhof SM, Wisse RP. Web-based telemonitoring of visual function and self-reported postoperative outcomes in cataract care: international multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2024; 50:947-955. [PMID: 38809014 PMCID: PMC11338021 DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare web-based, self-administered follow-up after cataract surgery to conventional face-to-face follow-up. SETTING Eye clinics in the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial with an embedded method comparison study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04809402). METHODS Routine patients with cataract were randomized into 2 groups: The telemonitoring group undertook web-based vision self-assessments and questionnaires from home, while the usual care group received conventional care. All participants had a 4- to 6-week postoperative clinic visit for safety and validation purposes. Outcomes included, the web test's accuracy for assessing postoperative visual acuity (VA) and refractive error, adverse event rates, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). RESULTS 94 participants (188 eyes) were enrolled. Web-based uncorrected distance VA testing demonstrated a negligible mean difference (-0.03 ± 0.14 logMAR) when compared with conventional Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart testing, with 95% limits of agreement ranging from -0.30 to 0.24 logMAR. The web-based refraction assessment overestimated the postoperative refractive error (mean difference in spherical equivalent 0.15 ± 0.67 diopters), resulting in a poorer corrected distance VA compared with subjective refraction (mean 0.1 vs -0.1 logMAR). Rates of adverse events and unscheduled consultations were minimal across both groups. Preoperative and postoperative PROM questionnaires had a 100% response rate. Visual functioning (Catquest-9SF and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25) improved postoperatively (mean improvement -0.80 and 16.70, respectively) and did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS The patients with cataract in this study effectively provided postoperative outcome data using a web interface. Both conventional and web-based follow-ups yielded similar PROMs and adverse event rates. Future developments should reduce the variability in the web-based VA test and yield representative refraction outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneau L.J. Claessens
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Joukje C. Wanten
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Noël J.C. Bauer
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Violette Vrijman
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Esen Selek
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Rob J. Wouters
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Nicolaas J. Reus
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Fallon J.G.M. van Dorst
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Oliver Findl
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Manuel Ruiss
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Karl Boden
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Kai Januschowski
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Saskia M. Imhof
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| | - Robert P.L. Wisse
- From the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Claessens, Imhof, Wisse); University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Wanten, Bauer, Nuijts); Oogcentrum Noordholland, Heerhugowaard, the Netherlands (Vrijman, Selek, Wouters); Department of Ophthalmology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands (Reus, van Dorst); Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria (Findl, Ruiss); Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, Sulzbach, Germany (Boden); Mount Saint Peter Eye Clinic, Trier, Germany (Januschowski)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Orfeo V, Aragona P, Alessio G, Drago L, Mastropasqua L, Rossi S, Vinciguerra P, Ciprandi G, Tognetto D. Expert consensus on the management of patients undergoing cataract surgery: A Delphi study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2024; 34:747-753. [PMID: 37700672 DOI: 10.1177/11206721231200996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To define the management of patients undergoing cataract surgery. SETTING Panel of experts on cataract surgery and members of the Italian Association of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (AICCER) participated in the Delphi study. DESIGN A restricted panel of experts defined the statements concerning the topic and identified a larger panel of experts who voted the statements. The statements concerned a series of practical issues concerning the management of patients undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS An initial web round-table served to develop the statements. The larger panel was constituted by 15 experts which anonymously voted the statements, presented in a web platform, using a 5- point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as at least 80% of agreement. RESULTS All participants completed the questionnaire. Globally, the total percentage of agreement of all statements was 90.4%. The total mean score was 4.5. Score 4 and score 5 accounted for the 27% and the 68% of the total votes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The participants felt they could largely agree with and approve the statements proposed by the board. In addition, the Delphi study identified some points that are highly shared and endorsed. In particular, a new model approach can be based on a seven-day course using a fixed high-potency corticosteroid combination with a broad-spectrum antibiotic. At the end of this cycle, the patient should be re-evaluated in some way to continue any treatment in the most appropriate and personalized way possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Giovanni Alessio
- Ophthalmology Clinic, Neuroscience Department, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Drago
- Clinical Microbiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Mastropasqua
- Ophthalmology Clinic, National Center of High Technology in Ophthalmology, University "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Scipione Rossi
- Ophthalmology and Ocular Microbiology, San Carlo Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Ciprandi
- Outpatients Department, Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro, Genoa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lim JS, Tan SS, Yeo YL, Hong M, Teo AWJ, Lee YF, Ting DSW, Aung T, Husain R. Replacing the postoperative week 1 visit after routine phacoemulsification with a telephone consult. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 2024:S0008-4182(24)00096-6. [PMID: 38604239 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the safety of replacing the postoperative week 1 (POW1) clinic visit with a nurse-conducted telephone call. DESIGN Retrospective observational study that included cases from January 2019 to June 2021. PARTICIPANTS Patients who had undergone uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery with an unremarkable postoperative day 1 (POD1) examination. METHODS All patients were seen in clinic on POD1 by an ophthalmologist. They then had a telephone conversation with a nurse at POW1 and subsequently an in-person postoperative month 1 (POM1) clinic consultation with an ophthalmologist. Main outcome measure was the incidence of unexpected management changes related to cataract surgery within POM1. Data also were collected on the reasons for unscheduled patient-initiated visits, additional procedures or medications, and postoperative visual acuity worse than 6/12 at POM1. RESULTS Of the 20,475 patients, 541 patients (2.64%) had an unexpected management change within POM1. There were 565 patients (2.76%) who had self-initiated unscheduled visits between POD1 to POM1. There were 23 patients (0.11%) who required additional surgery within POM1 and 1 patient (0.005%) with endophthalmitis. The most common indication for additional surgical procedures was retained lens material (7 patients, 30.43%). Visual acuity was worse than 6/12 in 1,199 patients (6.22%), with the most common causes attributed to preexisting ocular conditions. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that replacing the POW1 visit with a nurse-conducted telephone consult for patients who have undergone uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery and had a normal POD1 consultation is safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane S Lim
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
| | | | - Yi Lin Yeo
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
| | | | | | - Yi Fang Lee
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Daniel S W Ting
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Tin Aung
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Rahat Husain
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ruiss M, Pai V, Pilwachs C, Bayer N, Palkovits S, Findl O. Quality assurance via telephone interviews after cataract surgery: An explorative study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298149. [PMID: 38451971 PMCID: PMC10919583 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cataract surgery is a relatively safe procedure with satisfactory postoperative results in most patients. However, in rare cases severe complications can occur shortly after the intervention. Therefore, patients are advised to undergo an ophthalmological examination postoperatively, which should be performed as soon as possible in case of emergencies. However, exactly when these follow-up visits should take place is still discussed. A time- and cost-saving alternative to this could be short-term postoperative telemedical approaches. The aim of this study was to analyze patient complaints as well as satisfaction with and the best timepoint to perform telephone calls after cataract surgery. METHODS Patients scheduled for cataract surgery received a telephone call on the surgery day or the day after (study group) during which they were asked about complaints or additional examination visits. Patients without telephone calls served as control group. All patients had a follow-up visit one week after the intervention during which a questionnaire was filled out and the study group was asked about their satisfaction with the telephone calls. RESULTS 181 patients were recruited in this study. Ocular surface problems were the most common postoperative symptom. More than 80% of the patients were very satisfied with the telephone calls, with patients being contacted on the day of surgery being more calmed than those called on the next day. No difference in additional and planned follow-up visits was found between the study and the control group (P > .40). Postoperative patient complaints (Phi 0.372, P < .001) and additional prescribed therapy (Phi 0.480, P < .001) were moderately associated with additional visits. CONCLUSION Satisfaction with telephone reviews shortly after cataract surgery was very high and contacting patients on the evening of the day of the procedure could be a time- and cost-saving alternative to short-term in-house follow-up visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Ruiss
- Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Viktoria Pai
- Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Caroline Pilwachs
- Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Natascha Bayer
- Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Palkovits
- Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Oliver Findl
- Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), a Karl Landsteiner Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McLaughlin M, Salazar P, Piser D, Bands T, Shpountova K. Is It Safe to Omit the 1-week Post-operative Examination after Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification? Optom Vis Sci 2023; 100:697-701. [PMID: 37678385 DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000002068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE The incidence of cataract surgery is increasing, accounting for a large percentage of eye care expenses. Scientific evidence supporting the medical necessity of the traditional post-operative schedule is lacking. Further studies are needed to optimize post-operative care to reduce the burden on patients and medical providers. PURPOSE This study aimed to study the rate of complication 1 week after uncomplicated phacoemulsification to determine if the 1-week post-operative examination can be safely omitted. METHODS A retrospective record review was conducted on all consecutive patients who had uncomplicated phacoemulsification between February 1, 2019, and February 1, 2020, at a clinic in an urban setting with a predominantly Black and African American patient population. Subjects were included if they had no complications during the 1-day post-operative examination. Complications at the 1-week and 1-month post-operative examination were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS Omitting the 1-week post-operative examination would result in missed complications in 4.48 to 15.97% of patients and failure to make unexpected management changes in 1.78 to 13.84% of patients. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study do not support omitting the 1-week post-operative examination after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Further studies are needed to determine whether telemedicine can be safely substituted for post-operative examinations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Al-Ani HH, Li S, Niederer RL. Telephone follow-up one day post-cataract surgery. Clin Exp Optom 2023; 106:741-745. [PMID: 36464321 DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2146482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
CLINICAL RELEVANCE With the increasing use of technology and an emerging need for virtual clinical reviews, particularly following the recent pandemic, it is essential to evaluate the safety of these clinical tools. BACKGROUND This retrospective study aims to determine the safety of virtual follow-up day one after cataract surgery. METHODS All patients who underwent cataract surgery at Auckland District Health Board, New Zealand (Aotearoa), and were triaged for telephone review the day after surgery, from 5th November 2018 to 31st January 2020, were eligible. Outcomes measured: presentations to the acute eye clinic prior to the post-operative visit (number and reasons) and complications at the one-month follow-up (persistent inflammation, cystoid macular oedema, raised intra-ocular pressure). RESULTS Nine hundred and eighty-seven cataract surgeries were triaged for virtual follow-up over the retrospective study period. Nine hundred and eighty-five cases in 928 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median duration of phone calls was 5 minutes (range 2-30). Prior to the one-month post-operative visit, there were 66 presentations to the acute eye clinic, most commonly due to ocular surface irritation (33.3%) and persisting inflammation (25.8%). At the one-month post-operative review, 110 cases (11.2%) had complications; 62 (6.3%) had persisting inflammation, 46 (4.7%) had cystoid macular oedema, and two (0.2%) had raised intraocular pressure. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest study of a virtual day one post-operative follow-up following cataract surgery, and demonstrates that, in carefully selected subjects, virtual follow-up is a safe alternative to a clinic review. This method could significantly reduce healthcare costs and serve to be more efficient and favourable for patients and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haya H Al-Ani
- Ophthalmology Department, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sunny Li
- Ophthalmology Department, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Rachael L Niederer
- Ophthalmology Department, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khavandi S, Lim E, Higham A, de Pennington N, Bindra M, Maling S, Adams M, Mole G. User-acceptability of an automated telephone call for post-operative follow-up after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 2023; 37:2069-2076. [PMID: 36274084 PMCID: PMC10333311 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02289-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovative technology is recommended to address the current capacity challenges facing the NHS. This study evaluates the patient acceptability of automated telephone follow-up after routine cataract surgery using Dora (Ufonia Limited, Oxford, United Kingdom), which to our knowledge is the first AI-powered clinical assistant to be used in the NHS. Dora has a natural-language, phone conversation with patients about their symptoms after cataract surgery. METHODS This is a prospective mixed-methods cohort study that was conducted at Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. All patients who were followed up using Dora were asked to give a Net Promoter Score (NPS), and 24 patients were randomly selected to complete the validated Telephone Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) as well as extended semi-structured interviews that underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 170 autonomous calls were completed. The median NPS score was 9 out of 10. The TUQ (scored out of 5) showed high rates of acceptability, with an overall mean score of 4.0. Simplicity, time saving, and ease of use scored the highest with a median of 5, whilst 'speaking to Dora feels the same as speaking to a clinician' scored a median of 3. The main themes extracted from the qualitative data were 'I can see why you're doing it', 'It went quite well actually', 'I just trust human beings I suppose'. CONCLUSION We found high levels of patient acceptability when using Dora across three acceptability measures. Dora provides a potential solution to reduce pressure on hospital capacity whilst also providing a convenient service for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Khavandi
- Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Ufonia Limited, 3-5 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford, UK
| | - Ernest Lim
- Ufonia Limited, 3-5 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford, UK.
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Aisling Higham
- Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Mandeep Bindra
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Buckinghamshire, UK
| | - Sarah Maling
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Buckinghamshire, UK
| | - Mike Adams
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Buckinghamshire, UK
- Royal College of Ophthalmology, London, UK
- United Kingdom & Ireland Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons, Wirral, UK
| | - Guy Mole
- Ufonia Limited, 3-5 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
[Position Paper and Recommendations for Action for Ecologically Sustainable Ophthalmology - Statement of the German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG) and the German Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA)]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2023; 240:198-217. [PMID: 36812927 DOI: 10.1055/a-2015-1562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
|
9
|
[Position paper and recommendations for action for ecologically sustainable ophthalmology : Statement of the German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG) and the German Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA)]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2023; 120:52-68. [PMID: 36625883 PMCID: PMC9838365 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-022-01792-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
|
10
|
McIntosh C, O'Higgins C, Philip J, Mizen K. A Survey on Patient and Clinician Satisfaction With a Rapidly Implemented Telephone Consultation Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus 2022; 14:e29325. [PMID: 36277587 PMCID: PMC9580406 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The novel coronavirus pandemic presented unique challenges to healthcare organisations on an unprecedented scale. Due to the cessation of routine care, the Humberside Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department implemented a telephone review service to maintain access to care. This survey study was conducted to gain feedback from patients and staff regarding the recently implemented remote telephone consultation service within the Humberside Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery unit. Methods: A paper questionnaire comprising 16 questions was posted to 199 patients who underwent telephone review. A further questionnaire was sent via SurveyMonkey (Momentive Inc., San Mateo) to the clinicians involved. Results: From 199 patients, 93 surveys returned were suitable for inclusion; 7 out of 12 staff replied to the survey. The results showed a high level of satisfaction with the service from both groups. There were also suggestions for future additions to the service, including use for new patient consultations, addition of webcam facilities and further streamlining of suitable cases for remote consultation. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated high patient and staff satisfaction with telephone consultations. It showed that over one third (37%) of patients were able to be discharged via telephone consultation, helping to maintain access, free up clinical resources and reduce the need for face-to-face clinical attendance, which has been vital throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We now have suggestions for how this service can be implemented in the longer term within our department, including developing clearer guidelines for inclusion in the service and the possible benefit of video consultation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Khair A, Cromwell PM, Abdelatif A, Boland F, O'Reilly C, Maudarbaccus N, Aremu M, Arumugasamy M, Walsh TN. Text Messaging, Telephone, or In-Person Outpatient Visit to the Surgical Clinic: A Randomized Trial. J Surg Res 2022; 280:226-233. [PMID: 36007481 PMCID: PMC9394432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Routine outpatient follow-up visits for surgical patients are a source of strain on health-care resources and patients. With the COVID-19 pandemic adding a new urgency to finding the safest follow-up arrangement, text message follow-up might prove an acceptable alternative to a phone call or an in-person clinic visit. METHODS An open-label, three-arm, parallel randomized trial was conducted. The interventions were traditional in-person appointment, a telephone call, or a text message. The primary outcome was the number of postdischarge complications identified. The secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction with follow-up, future preference, default to follow-up, and preference to receiving medical information by text message. RESULTS Two hundred eight patients underwent randomization: 50 in the in-person group, 80 in the telephone group, and 78 in the text message group. There was no difference in the number of reported complications: 5 (10%) patients in the in-person group, 7 (9%) patients in the text group, and 11 (14%) patients in the telephone group (P = 0.613). The preferred method of follow-up was by telephone (106, 61.6%). The least preferred was the in-person follow-up (15, 8.7%, P = 0.002), which also had the highest default rate (44%). CONCLUSIONS There was no evidence that text messages and telephone calls are unsafe and ineffective methods of follow-up. Although most patients are happy to receive results by text message, the majority of patients would prefer a telephone follow-up and are less likely to default by this method. Health-care systems should develop telehealth initiatives when planning health-care services in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Areeg Khair
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul M Cromwell
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Asila Abdelatif
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fiona Boland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colum O'Reilly
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nadiim Maudarbaccus
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Muyiwa Aremu
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mayilone Arumugasamy
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tom N Walsh
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Birtel J, Heimann H, Hoerauf H, Helbig H, Schulz C, Holz FG, Geerling G. [Sustainability in ophthalmology : Adaptation to the climate crisis and mitigation]. Ophthalmologe 2022; 119:567-576. [PMID: 35451609 PMCID: PMC9024069 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-022-01608-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Die Klimakrise bedroht die Gesundheit heutiger und künftiger Generationen und stellt das Gesundheitssystem vor besondere Herausforderungen. Zur Anpassung an den anthropogene Klimawandel sind umfängliche Adaptationsstrategien und eine Mitigation des Klimawandels notwendig. In der Medizin sowie in der Augenheilkunde gibt es vielfältige Möglichkeiten zur Reduktion des CO2(Kohlendioxid)-Fußabdrucks, die es zu ergreifen gilt, die ordnungspolitisch gefördert und eingefordert werden sollten. Das aufkommende Feld der datengesteuerten Nachhaltigkeit kann Werkzeuge liefern, um den ökologischen Fußabdruck der eigenen Tätigkeit zu evaluieren sowie Optimierungen zu initiieren. Lebenszyklusanalysen können Instrumente für systematische Ökobilanzen sein und nachhaltige Produkt- und Praxisentscheidungen ermöglichen. Das deutsche Gesundheitssystem sollte eine quantifizierbare und holistische Strategie zur CO2-Reduktion entwickeln; Nachhaltigkeit könnte zukünftig ein Leistungsindikator sein. Dieser Artikel diskutiert mit augenärztlicher Perspektive Beispiele zur Adaptation an die Klimakrise und zur Mitigation; dies schließt kleine Maßnahmen, die jeder Einzelne umsetzen kann, als auch größere, strukturelle Ansätze ein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Birtel
- Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Großbritannien.
- Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Großbritannien.
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
| | - Heinrich Heimann
- St. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Großbritannien
| | - Hans Hoerauf
- Augenklinik der Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Horst Helbig
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Christian Schulz
- Deutsche Allianz Klimawandel und Gesundheit, Berlin, Deutschland
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Frank G Holz
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Gerd Geerling
- Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dığın F, Özkan ZK, Şahin A. Effect of Sending SMS, Which Reminds About the Intake of Medication, on Reducing Postoperative Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Perianesth Nurs 2021; 37:75-79. [PMID: 34815165 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients undergoing cataract surgery find postoperative medication management difficult and are anxious about this issue. Differences in the number of medications and frequency of administration can lead to confusion in patients. The aim of this randomized-controlled study was to evaluate the effect of sending short message service (SMS) texts, to reminds patients about need to take postoperative medications, on reducing postoperative anxiety in patients undergoing cataract surgery. DESIGN The randomized, controlled study. METHODS The patients in the experimental group received short message service reminders on the first to the seventh days postoperatively. FINDINGS The SMS group was found to have significantly lower State Anxiety Inventory mean scores than the control group on the seventh postoperative day (P = .001). The majority (82.9%) of patients were satisfied with receiving an SMS reminder. CONCLUSIONS In this study, SMS reminders may be effective in decreasing postoperative anxiety for patients undergoing cataract surgery and this intervention was welcomed by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Figen Dığın
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kırklareli University, Kırklareli, Turkey.
| | - Zeynep Kızılcık Özkan
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Ayşe Şahin
- Martyr Professor Dr İlhan Varank Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kamal Z, Jamil AZ, Khokhar HS, Huma F. Comparison of safety and number of post-operative visits of patients in convenient day versus conventional first day follow-up after phacoemulsification. Pak J Med Sci 2021; 37:1440-1444. [PMID: 34475927 PMCID: PMC8377886 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.4121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To compare safety and number of post-operative visits of patients in convenient day versus conventional first day follow-up after phacoemulsification. Methods This observational cohort study was conducted in Department of ophthalmology, Sahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal from November 2019 to August 2020. There were 600 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. Patients were allocated into two groups. Group-I comprised of patients with convenient day follow-up during the first post-operative week. Group-II comprised of the patients with conventional first day follow-up. Rate of complications, number of visits during the first month and final visual acuity were recorded. Results In Group-I post-operative complications were noted in 12.67% cases on first follow up visit and in 2.67% cases on first month follow up visit. In Group-II post-operative complication were noted in 22 % cases on first follow up visit and in 4% cases on first month follow up visit. Common postoperative complications were corneal oedema, anterior segment intraocular inflammation, residual lens matter in anterior chamber and intraocular lens subluxation. There was no difference in presenting and postoperative visual acuity between the two groups. Mean follow-up visits were 2.23 ± 0.42 in Group-I and 3.55 ± 0.50 in Group-II. Conclusion Convenient day follow-up is as safe as conventional first day follow-up. Convenient day follow-up significantly reduces the number of post-operative visits. This would translate into cost reduction both for the patients and the health care facility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahid Kamal
- Zahid Kamal, MBBS, FRCS(Ed), FCPS, FRVEEH, MCPS (HPE). Professor of Ophthalmology, Sahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal, Pakistan
| | - Ahmad Zeeshan Jamil
- Ahmad Zeeshan Jamil, MBBS, MCPS, FCPS, FRCS, FCPS (VRO). Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Sahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal, Pakistan
| | - Hira Shuja Khokhar
- Hira Shuja Khokhar, MBBS. Post Graduate Trainee, Department of Ophthalmology, Unit 1, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Farah Huma
- Farah Huma, MBBS. Post Graduate Trainee, Department of Ophthalmology, Unit 1, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lin PF, Naveed H, Eleftheriadou M, Purbrick R, Zarei Ghanavati M, Liu C. Cataract service redesign in the post-COVID-19 era. Br J Ophthalmol 2020; 105:745-750. [PMID: 32703783 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 has impacted all aspects of clinical practice in the UK. Cataract services suffered severe disruption due to necessary measures taken to reduce elective surgery in order to release capacity to support intensive care requirements. Faced with a potential 50% increase in cataract surgery workload per week in the post-COVID-19 world, eye units should use this event to innovate, not just survive but to also evolve for a sustainable future. In this article, we discuss the inadequacies of existing service rationing options to tackle the COVID-19 cataract backlog. This includes limiting rationing based on visual acuity, limiting surgery to first or only seeing eyes, and postponing clinic and surgical dates according to referral dates. We propose units use the lockdown time to reset and develop a comprehensive patient-centred care pathway using principles of value-based healthcare: the cataract integrated practice units. Developing an agile surgical database that incorporates all aspects of patient need from education to follow-up in their individual cataract journey will allow units to react and plan quickly in the early phase of recovery and beyond. We also discuss the considerations units should bear in mind on telemedicine, modifications for face-to-face clinics, theatre organisation and options of expanding cataract throughput capacity. The pause in elective surgery due to the pandemic may have provided cataract services a rare opportunity to reset and transform cataract service pathways for the digital era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Fen Lin
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hasan Naveed
- Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.,Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Robert Purbrick
- Sussex Eye Hospital, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Moustafa GA, Borkar DS, Borboli-Gerogiannis S, Greenstein SH, Lorch AC, Vasan RA, Kloek CE. Optimization of cataract surgery follow-up: A standard set of questions can predict unexpected management changes at postoperative week one. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0221243. [PMID: 31536500 PMCID: PMC6752806 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is limited evidence to inform the optimal follow-up schedule after cataract surgery. This study aims to determine whether a standardized question set can predict unexpected management changes (UMCs) at the postoperative week one (POW1) timepoint. SETTING Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. METHODS Two-hundred-and-fifty-four consecutive phacoemulsification cases having attended an examination between postoperative days 5-14. A set of 7 'Yes' or 'No' questions were administered to all participants by a technician at the POW1 visit. Patient answers along with perioperative patient information were recorded and analyzed. Outcomes were the incidence of UMCs at POW1. RESULTS The incidence of UMCs was zero in uneventful cataract cases with unremarkable history and normal postoperative day one exam if no positive answers were given with the question set demonstrating 100% sensitivity (p<0.0001). A test version with 5 questions was equally sensitive in detecting UMCs at POW1 after cataract surgery. CONCLUSION In routine cataract cases with no positive answers to the current set of clinical questions, a POW1 visit is unlikely to result in a management change. This result offers the opportunity for eye care providers to risk-stratify patients who have had cataract surgery and individualize follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giannis A. Moustafa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Durga S. Borkar
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Sheila Borboli-Gerogiannis
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Scott H. Greenstein
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Alice C. Lorch
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ryan A. Vasan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Carolyn E. Kloek
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gülşen M, Akansel N. Effects of Discharge Education and Telephone Follow-up on Cataract Patients' Activities According to the Model of Living. J Perianesth Nurs 2019; 35:67-74. [PMID: 31522953 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assess the impact of planned discharge education and telephone follow-up of patients who underwent cataract surgery on daily living activities. DESIGN A controlled comparative study. METHODS This study was carried out on patients who underwent cataract surgery (intervention group = 72, control group = 72). Discharge education designed according to the Model of Living was used in the intervention group. Phone follow up was performed for both groups after surgery and activities were assessed. FINDINGS Significant differences were found between the two groups in applying eye drops, knowledge on using old eye glasses and protecting the operated eye, conditions requiring a physician call, conditions that may deteriorate the operated eye, personal hygiene, mobilization, and sleeping (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Using a Model of Living in discharge education of cataract patients and following up using a structured checklist was an effective intervention. This model can be efficiently used in postoperative education of day surgery patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muaz Gülşen
- Department of Surgical Nursing, Çukurova University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Adana, Turkey
| | - Neriman Akansel
- Department of Surgical Nursing, Bursa Uludağ University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bursa, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Incidence of Management Changes at the Postoperative Week 1 Visit after Cataract Surgery: Results from the Perioperative Care for IntraOcular Lens Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2019; 199:94-100. [PMID: 30339795 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To ascertain the incidence of unexpected management changes at the postoperative week 1 visit in asymptomatic patients who have had an uncomplicated cataract surgery and a routine postoperative day 1 examination. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted of all cases of cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens insertion performed by the Comprehensive Ophthalmology Service at Massachusetts Eye and Ear between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014. The preoperative consultation, operative report, and postoperative day 1 and week 1 (postoperative days 5-14) visits were reviewed. Cases with intraoperative complications, as well as clinical findings at postoperative day 1 requiring close follow-up, were excluded. The main outcome measure was incidence of unexpected management changes at the postoperative week 1 visit after cataract surgery, defined as an unanticipated change in postoperative drops, additional procedures, or urgent referral to a specialty service. RESULTS Overall, 1938 surgical cases of 1471 patients were reviewed, and 1510 cases (77.9%) underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation with a routine postoperative day 1 examination. Of these 1510 cases, 238 (15.8%) reported symptoms at the postoperative week 1 visit, including flashes, floaters, redness, pain, or decreased vision, which warranted an examination. In total, 1272 cases were asymptomatic, and only 11 of these cases (0.9%) had an unexpected management change at postoperative week 1. Eight of 11 patients were asymptomatic steroid responders requiring alteration of their postoperative drops. Two of these patients had an intraocular pressure >30 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS Unexpected management changes at the postoperative week 1 timepoint after cataract surgery are rare in asymptomatic patients who have had uncomplicated cataract surgery and a routine postoperative day 1 examination. Limited data are available to outline an optimal postoperative regimen after cataract surgery. The results of this study suggest that postoperative week 1 examinations could potentially be performed on an as-needed basis in the appropriate subgroup of patients after cataract surgery.
Collapse
|