1
|
Kumari V, Kumar N, Kumar K S, Kumar A, Skandha SS, Saxena S, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Singh N, Fouda MM, Saba L, Singh R, Suri JS. Deep Learning Paradigm and Its Bias for Coronary Artery Wall Segmentation in Intravascular Ultrasound Scans: A Closer Look. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:485. [PMID: 38132653 PMCID: PMC10743870 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10120485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION Coronary artery disease (CAD) has the highest mortality rate; therefore, its diagnosis is vital. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a high-resolution imaging solution that can image coronary arteries, but the diagnosis software via wall segmentation and quantification has been evolving. In this study, a deep learning (DL) paradigm was explored along with its bias. METHODS Using a PRISMA model, 145 best UNet-based and non-UNet-based methods for wall segmentation were selected and analyzed for their characteristics and scientific and clinical validation. This study computed the coronary wall thickness by estimating the inner and outer borders of the coronary artery IVUS cross-sectional scans. Further, the review explored the bias in the DL system for the first time when it comes to wall segmentation in IVUS scans. Three bias methods, namely (i) ranking, (ii) radial, and (iii) regional area, were applied and compared using a Venn diagram. Finally, the study presented explainable AI (XAI) paradigms in the DL framework. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS UNet provides a powerful paradigm for the segmentation of coronary walls in IVUS scans due to its ability to extract automated features at different scales in encoders, reconstruct the segmented image using decoders, and embed the variants in skip connections. Most of the research was hampered by a lack of motivation for XAI and pruned AI (PAI) models. None of the UNet models met the criteria for bias-free design. For clinical assessment and settings, it is necessary to move from a paper-to-practice approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vandana Kumari
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India; (V.K.); (S.K.K.)
| | - Naresh Kumar
- Department of Applied Computational Science and Engineering, G L Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Sampath Kumar K
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India; (V.K.); (S.K.K.)
| | - Ashish Kumar
- School of CSET, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India;
| | - Sanagala S. Skandha
- Department of CSE, CMR College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad 501401, India;
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar 751003, India;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Rajesh Singh
- Department of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostics and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India
- Monitoring and Diagnosis Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dubey AK, Chabert GL, Carriero A, Pasche A, Danna PSC, Agarwal S, Mohanty L, Sharma N, Yadav S, Jain A, Kumar A, Kalra MK, Sobel DW, Laird JR, Singh IM, Singh N, Tsoulfas G, Fouda MM, Alizad A, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Kukuljan M, Al-Maini M, El-Baz A, Saba L, Suri JS. Ensemble Deep Learning Derived from Transfer Learning for Classification of COVID-19 Patients on Hybrid Deep-Learning-Based Lung Segmentation: A Data Augmentation and Balancing Framework. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111954. [PMID: 37296806 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION Lung computed tomography (CT) techniques are high-resolution and are well adopted in the intensive care unit (ICU) for COVID-19 disease control classification. Most artificial intelligence (AI) systems do not undergo generalization and are typically overfitted. Such trained AI systems are not practical for clinical settings and therefore do not give accurate results when executed on unseen data sets. We hypothesize that ensemble deep learning (EDL) is superior to deep transfer learning (TL) in both non-augmented and augmented frameworks. METHODOLOGY The system consists of a cascade of quality control, ResNet-UNet-based hybrid deep learning for lung segmentation, and seven models using TL-based classification followed by five types of EDL's. To prove our hypothesis, five different kinds of data combinations (DC) were designed using a combination of two multicenter cohorts-Croatia (80 COVID) and Italy (72 COVID and 30 controls)-leading to 12,000 CT slices. As part of generalization, the system was tested on unseen data and statistically tested for reliability/stability. RESULTS Using the K5 (80:20) cross-validation protocol on the balanced and augmented dataset, the five DC datasets improved TL mean accuracy by 3.32%, 6.56%, 12.96%, 47.1%, and 2.78%, respectively. The five EDL systems showed improvements in accuracy of 2.12%, 5.78%, 6.72%, 32.05%, and 2.40%, thus validating our hypothesis. All statistical tests proved positive for reliability and stability. CONCLUSION EDL showed superior performance to TL systems for both (a) unbalanced and unaugmented and (b) balanced and augmented datasets for both (i) seen and (ii) unseen paradigms, validating both our hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Kumar Dubey
- Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Gian Luca Chabert
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessio Pasche
- Department of Radiology, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Pietro S C Danna
- Department of Radiology, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Lopamudra Mohanty
- ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad 201009, India
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India
| | - Sarita Yadav
- Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Achin Jain
- Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Mannudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - David W Sobel
- Men's Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Melita Kukuljan
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | - Ayman El-Baz
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Saba L, Chabert GL, Carriero A, Paschè A, Danna P, Mehmedović A, Faa G, Jujaray T, Singh IM, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Sfikakis PP, Agarwal V, Teji JS, R Yadav R, Nagy F, Kincses ZT, Ruzsa Z, Viskovic K, Kalra MK. Multicenter Study on COVID-19 Lung Computed Tomography Segmentation with varying Glass Ground Opacities using Unseen Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Paradigms: COVLIAS 1.0 Validation. J Med Syst 2022; 46:62. [PMID: 35988110 PMCID: PMC9392994 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Variations in COVID-19 lesions such as glass ground opacities (GGO), consolidations, and crazy paving can compromise the ability of solo-deep learning (SDL) or hybrid-deep learning (HDL) artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting automated COVID-19 lung segmentation in Computed Tomography (CT) from unseen data leading to poor clinical manifestations. As the first study of its kind, “COVLIAS 1.0-Unseen” proves two hypotheses, (i) contrast adjustment is vital for AI, and (ii) HDL is superior to SDL. In a multicenter study, 10,000 CT slices were collected from 72 Italian (ITA) patients with low-GGO, and 80 Croatian (CRO) patients with high-GGO. Hounsfield Units (HU) were automatically adjusted to train the AI models and predict from test data, leading to four combinations—two Unseen sets: (i) train-CRO:test-ITA, (ii) train-ITA:test-CRO, and two Seen sets: (iii) train-CRO:test-CRO, (iv) train-ITA:test-ITA. COVILAS used three SDL models: PSPNet, SegNet, UNet and six HDL models: VGG-PSPNet, VGG-SegNet, VGG-UNet, ResNet-PSPNet, ResNet-SegNet, and ResNet-UNet. Two trained, blinded senior radiologists conducted ground truth annotations. Five types of performance metrics were used to validate COVLIAS 1.0-Unseen which was further benchmarked against MedSeg, an open-source web-based system. After HU adjustment for DS and JI, HDL (Unseen AI) > SDL (Unseen AI) by 4% and 5%, respectively. For CC, HDL (Unseen AI) > SDL (Unseen AI) by 6%. The COVLIAS-MedSeg difference was < 5%, meeting regulatory guidelines.Unseen AI was successfully demonstrated using automated HU adjustment. HDL was found to be superior to SDL.
Collapse
|
4
|
Stratification of risk of atherosclerotic plaque using Hu’s moment invariants of segmented ultrasonic images. BIOMED ENG-BIOMED TE 2022; 67:391-402. [DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2021-0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Myocardial infarction is one of the major life-threatening diseases. The cause is atherosclerosis i.e. the occlusion of the coronary artery by deposition of plaque on its walls. The severity of plaque deposition in the artery depends on the characteristics of the plaque. Hence, the classification of the type of plaque is crucial for assessing the risk of atherosclerosis and predicting the chances of myocardial infarction. This paper proposes prediction of atherosclerotic risk by non-invasive ultrasound image segmentation and textural feature extraction. The intima-media complex is segmented using a snakes-based segmentation algorithm on the arterial wall in the ultrasound images. Then, the plaque is extracted from the segmented intima-media complex. The features of the plaque are obtained by computing Hu’s moment invariants. Visual pattern recognition independent of position, size, orientation and parallel projection could be done using these moment invariants. For the classification of the features of the plaque, an SVM classifier is used. The performance shows improvement in accuracy using lesser number of features than previous works. The reduction in feature size is achieved by incorporating segmentation in the pre-processing stage. Tenfold cross-validation protocol is used for training and testing the classifier. An accuracy of 97.9% is obtained with only two features. This proposed technique could work as an adjunct tool in quick decision-making for cardiologists and radiologists. The segmentation step introduced in the preprocessing stage improved the feature extraction technique. An improvement in performance is achieved with much less number of features.
Collapse
|
5
|
COVLIAS 2.0-cXAI: Cloud-Based Explainable Deep Learning System for COVID-19 Lesion Localization in Computed Tomography Scans. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12061482. [PMID: 35741292 PMCID: PMC9221733 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The previous COVID-19 lung diagnosis system lacks both scientific validation and the role of explainable artificial intelligence (AI) for understanding lesion localization. This study presents a cloud-based explainable AI, the “COVLIAS 2.0-cXAI” system using four kinds of class activation maps (CAM) models. Methodology: Our cohort consisted of ~6000 CT slices from two sources (Croatia, 80 COVID-19 patients and Italy, 15 control patients). COVLIAS 2.0-cXAI design consisted of three stages: (i) automated lung segmentation using hybrid deep learning ResNet-UNet model by automatic adjustment of Hounsfield units, hyperparameter optimization, and parallel and distributed training, (ii) classification using three kinds of DenseNet (DN) models (DN-121, DN-169, DN-201), and (iii) validation using four kinds of CAM visualization techniques: gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM), Grad-CAM++, score-weighted CAM (Score-CAM), and FasterScore-CAM. The COVLIAS 2.0-cXAI was validated by three trained senior radiologists for its stability and reliability. The Friedman test was also performed on the scores of the three radiologists. Results: The ResNet-UNet segmentation model resulted in dice similarity of 0.96, Jaccard index of 0.93, a correlation coefficient of 0.99, with a figure-of-merit of 95.99%, while the classifier accuracies for the three DN nets (DN-121, DN-169, and DN-201) were 98%, 98%, and 99% with a loss of ~0.003, ~0.0025, and ~0.002 using 50 epochs, respectively. The mean AUC for all three DN models was 0.99 (p < 0.0001). The COVLIAS 2.0-cXAI showed 80% scans for mean alignment index (MAI) between heatmaps and gold standard, a score of four out of five, establishing the system for clinical settings. Conclusions: The COVLIAS 2.0-cXAI successfully showed a cloud-based explainable AI system for lesion localization in lung CT scans.
Collapse
|
6
|
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Radiogenomics for Cancers in the Era of Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122860. [PMID: 35740526 PMCID: PMC9220825 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Recently, radiogenomics has played a significant role and offered a new understanding of cancer’s biology and behavior in response to standard therapy. It also provides a more precise prognosis, investigation, and analysis of the patient’s cancer. Over the years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has provided a significant strength in radiogenomics. In this paper, we offer computational and oncological prospects of the role of AI in radiogenomics, as well as its offers, achievements, opportunities, and limitations in the current clinical practices. Abstract Radiogenomics, a combination of “Radiomics” and “Genomics,” using Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently emerged as the state-of-the-art science in precision medicine, especially in oncology care. Radiogenomics syndicates large-scale quantifiable data extracted from radiological medical images enveloped with personalized genomic phenotypes. It fabricates a prediction model through various AI methods to stratify the risk of patients, monitor therapeutic approaches, and assess clinical outcomes. It has recently shown tremendous achievements in prognosis, treatment planning, survival prediction, heterogeneity analysis, reoccurrence, and progression-free survival for human cancer study. Although AI has shown immense performance in oncology care in various clinical aspects, it has several challenges and limitations. The proposed review provides an overview of radiogenomics with the viewpoints on the role of AI in terms of its promises for computational as well as oncological aspects and offers achievements and opportunities in the era of precision medicine. The review also presents various recommendations to diminish these obstacles.
Collapse
|
7
|
Sanagala SS, Nicolaides A, Gupta SK, Koppula VK, Saba L, Agarwal S, Johri AM, Kalra MS, Suri JS. Ten Fast Transfer Learning Models for Carotid Ultrasound Plaque Tissue Characterization in Augmentation Framework Embedded with Heatmaps for Stroke Risk Stratification. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:2109. [PMID: 34829456 PMCID: PMC8622690 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Only 1-2% of the internal carotid artery asymptomatic plaques are unstable as a result of >80% stenosis. Thus, unnecessary efforts can be saved if these plaques can be characterized and classified into symptomatic and asymptomatic using non-invasive B-mode ultrasound. Earlier plaque tissue characterization (PTC) methods were machine learning (ML)-based, which used hand-crafted features that yielded lower accuracy and unreliability. The proposed study shows the role of transfer learning (TL)-based deep learning models for PTC. Methods: As pertained weights were used in the supercomputer framework, we hypothesize that transfer learning (TL) provides improved performance compared with deep learning. We applied 11 kinds of artificial intelligence (AI) models, 10 of them were augmented and optimized using TL approaches-a class of Atheromatic™ 2.0 TL (AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA) that consisted of (i-ii) Visual Geometric Group-16, 19 (VGG16, 19); (iii) Inception V3 (IV3); (iv-v) DenseNet121, 169; (vi) XceptionNet; (vii) ResNet50; (viii) MobileNet; (ix) AlexNet; (x) SqueezeNet; and one DL-based (xi) SuriNet-derived from UNet. We benchmark 11 AI models against our earlier deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model. Results: The best performing TL was MobileNet, with accuracy and area-under-the-curve (AUC) pairs of 96.10 ± 3% and 0.961 (p < 0.0001), respectively. In DL, DCNN was comparable to SuriNet, with an accuracy of 95.66% and 92.7 ± 5.66%, and an AUC of 0.956 (p < 0.0001) and 0.927 (p < 0.0001), respectively. We validated the performance of the AI architectures with established biomarkers such as greyscale median (GSM), fractal dimension (FD), higher-order spectra (HOS), and visual heatmaps. We benchmarked against previously developed Atheromatic™ 1.0 ML and showed an improvement of 12.9%. Conclusions: TL is a powerful AI tool for PTC into symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Skandha S. Sanagala
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad 501401, TS, India; (S.S.S.); (V.K.K.)
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida 203206, UP, India;
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 1700, Cyprus;
| | - Suneet K. Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida 203206, UP, India;
| | - Vijaya K. Koppula
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad 501401, TS, India; (S.S.S.); (V.K.K.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy;
| | | | - Amer M. Johri
- Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Manudeep S. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™ LLC, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Elavarthi P, Pathak R, Ketireddy V, Columbu M, Saba L, Gupta SK, Faa G, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Ferenc N, Ruzsa Z, Gupta A, Naidu S, Kalra MK. Inter-Variability Study of COVLIAS 1.0: Hybrid Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Lung Segmentation in Computed Tomography. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:2025. [PMID: 34829372 PMCID: PMC8625039 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: For COVID-19 lung severity, segmentation of lungs on computed tomography (CT) is the first crucial step. Current deep learning (DL)-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have a bias in the training stage of segmentation because only one set of ground truth (GT) annotations are evaluated. We propose a robust and stable inter-variability analysis of CT lung segmentation in COVID-19 to avoid the effect of bias. Methodology: The proposed inter-variability study consists of two GT tracers for lung segmentation on chest CT. Three AI models, PSP Net, VGG-SegNet, and ResNet-SegNet, were trained using GT annotations. We hypothesized that if AI models are trained on the GT tracings from multiple experience levels, and if the AI performance on the test data between these AI models is within the 5% range, one can consider such an AI model robust and unbiased. The K5 protocol (training to testing: 80%:20%) was adapted. Ten kinds of metrics were used for performance evaluation. Results: The database consisted of 5000 CT chest images from 72 COVID-19-infected patients. By computing the coefficient of correlations (CC) between the output of the two AI models trained corresponding to the two GT tracers, computing their differences in their CC, and repeating the process for all three AI-models, we show the differences as 0%, 0.51%, and 2.04% (all < 5%), thereby validating the hypothesis. The performance was comparable; however, it had the following order: ResNet-SegNet > PSP Net > VGG-SegNet. Conclusions: The AI models were clinically robust and stable during the inter-variability analysis on the CT lung segmentation on COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Pranav Elavarthi
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
- Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Alexandria, VA 22312, USA
| | - Rajesh Pathak
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur 492001, India;
| | | | - Marta Columbu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Suneet K. Gupta
- Department of Computer Science, Bennett University, Noida 201310, India;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 10558 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | | | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2368, Cyprus;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA 95611, USA; (S.K.D.); (V.R.)
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Nagy Ferenc
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Zoltan Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Archna Gupta
- Radiology Department, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | - Mannudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saba L, Sanagala SS, Gupta SK, Koppula VK, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Sharma AM, Viswanathan V, Rathore VS, Turk M, Kolluri R, Viskovic K, Cuadrado-Godia E, Kitas GD, Sharma N, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. Multimodality carotid plaque tissue characterization and classification in the artificial intelligence paradigm: a narrative review for stroke application. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1206. [PMID: 34430647 PMCID: PMC8350643 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States of America and globally. Carotid arterial plaque, a cause and also a marker of such CVD, can be detected by various non-invasive imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computer tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US). Characterization and classification of carotid plaque-type in these imaging modalities, especially into symptomatic and asymptomatic plaque, helps in the planning of carotid endarterectomy or stenting. It can be challenging to characterize plaque components due to (I) partial volume effect in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or (II) varying Hausdorff values in plaque regions in CT, and (III) attenuation of echoes reflected by the plaque during US causing acoustic shadowing. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have become an indispensable part of healthcare and their applications to the non-invasive imaging technologies such as MRI, CT, and the US. In this narrative review, three main types of AI models (machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning) are analyzed when applied to MRI, CT, and the US. A link between carotid plaque characteristics and the risk of coronary artery disease is presented. With regard to characterization, we review tools and techniques that use AI models to distinguish carotid plaque types based on signal processing and feature strengths. We conclude that AI-based solutions offer an accurate and robust path for tissue characterization and classification for carotid artery plaque imaging in all three imaging modalities. Due to cost, user-friendliness, and clinical effectiveness, AI in the US has dominated the most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Skandha S Sanagala
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India.,CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Vijaya K Koppula
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Durga P Misra
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes & Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Vijay S Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | | | | | | | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, IIT-BHU, Banaras, UP, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Viswanathan V, Puvvula A, Jamthikar AD, Saba L, Johri AM, Kotsis V, Khanna NN, Dhanjil SK, Majhail M, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Sharma AM, Kolluri R, Naidu S, Suri JS. Bidirectional link between diabetes mellitus and coronavirus disease 2019 leading to cardiovascular disease: A narrative review. World J Diabetes 2021; 12:215-237. [PMID: 33758644 PMCID: PMC7958478 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i3.215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic where several comorbidities have been shown to have a significant effect on mortality. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher mortality rate than non-DM patients if they get COVID-19. Recent studies have indicated that patients with a history of diabetes can increase the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Additionally, patients without any history of diabetes can acquire new-onset DM when infected with COVID-19. Thus, there is a need to explore the bidirectional link between these two conditions, confirming the vicious loop between "DM/COVID-19". This narrative review presents (1) the bidirectional association between the DM and COVID-19, (2) the manifestations of the DM/COVID-19 loop leading to cardiovascular disease, (3) an understanding of primary and secondary factors that influence mortality due to the DM/COVID-19 loop, (4) the role of vitamin-D in DM patients during COVID-19, and finally, (5) the monitoring tools for tracking atherosclerosis burden in DM patients during COVID-19 and "COVID-triggered DM" patients. We conclude that the bidirectional nature of DM/COVID-19 causes acceleration towards cardiovascular events. Due to this alarming condition, early monitoring of atherosclerotic burden is required in "Diabetes patients during COVID-19" or "new-onset Diabetes triggered by COVID-19 in Non-Diabetes patients".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Viswanathan
- M Viswanathan Hospital for Diabetes, M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai 600013, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Annu’s Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore 524101, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communications, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440010, Maharashtra, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Monserrato 09045, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Vasilios Kotsis
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension Center, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541-24, Greece
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110020, India
| | - Surinder K Dhanjil
- Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™ LLC, CA 95661, United States
| | - Misha Majhail
- Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, United States
| | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Departments of Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, United Kingdom
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, United States
| | - Raghu Kolluri
- OhioHealth Heart and Vascular, Ohio, OH 43082, United States
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, United States
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Agarwal M, Saba L, Gupta SK, Carriero A, Falaschi Z, Paschè A, Danna P, El-Baz A, Naidu S, Suri JS. A Novel Block Imaging Technique Using Nine Artificial Intelligence Models for COVID-19 Disease Classification, Characterization and Severity Measurement in Lung Computed Tomography Scans on an Italian Cohort. J Med Syst 2021; 45:28. [PMID: 33496876 PMCID: PMC7835451 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01707-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Computer Tomography (CT) is currently being adapted for visualization of COVID-19 lung damage. Manual classification and characterization of COVID-19 may be biased depending on the expert's opinion. Artificial Intelligence has recently penetrated COVID-19, especially deep learning paradigms. There are nine kinds of classification systems in this study, namely one deep learning-based CNN, five kinds of transfer learning (TL) systems namely VGG16, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, DenseNet201 and MobileNet, three kinds of machine-learning (ML) systems, namely artificial neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF) that have been designed for classification of COVID-19 segmented CT lung against Controls. Three kinds of characterization systems were developed namely (a) Block imaging for COVID-19 severity index (CSI); (b) Bispectrum analysis; and (c) Block Entropy. A cohort of Italian patients with 30 controls (990 slices) and 30 COVID-19 patients (705 slices) was used to test the performance of three types of classifiers. Using K10 protocol (90% training and 10% testing), the best accuracy and AUC was for DCNN and RF pairs were 99.41 ± 5.12%, 0.991 (p < 0.0001), and 99.41 ± 0.62%, 0.988 (p < 0.0001), respectively, followed by other ML and TL classifiers. We show that diagnostics odds ratio (DOR) was higher for DL compared to ML, and both, Bispecturm and Block Entropy shows higher values for COVID-19 patients. CSI shows an association with Ground Glass Opacities (0.9146, p < 0.0001). Our hypothesis holds true that deep learning shows superior performance compared to machine learning models. Block imaging is a powerful novel approach for pinpointing COVID-19 severity and is clinically validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Agarwal
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, India
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U, "Maggiore d.c." Universiy of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Zeno Falaschi
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U, "Maggiore d.c." Universiy of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessio Paschè
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U, "Maggiore d.c." Universiy of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Pietro Danna
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U, "Maggiore d.c." Universiy of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Ayman El-Baz
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ultrasound-based internal carotid artery plaque characterization using deep learning paradigm on a supercomputer: a cardiovascular disease/stroke risk assessment system. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 37:1511-1528. [DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-02124-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
13
|
Suri JS, Puvvula A, Biswas M, Majhail M, Saba L, Faa G, Singh IM, Oberleitner R, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Sanches JM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Ahluwalia P, Kolluri R, Teji J, Maini MA, Agbakoba A, Dhanjil SK, Sockalingam M, Saxena A, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Ajuluchukwu JNA, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Viswanathan V, Krishnan PR, Naidu S. COVID-19 pathways for brain and heart injury in comorbidity patients: A role of medical imaging and artificial intelligence-based COVID severity classification: A review. Comput Biol Med 2020; 124:103960. [PMID: 32919186 PMCID: PMC7426723 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has penetrated the field of medicine, particularly the field of radiology. Since its emergence, the highly virulent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected over 10 million people, leading to over 500,000 deaths as of July 1st, 2020. Since the outbreak began, almost 28,000 articles about COVID-19 have been published (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov); however, few have explored the role of imaging and artificial intelligence in COVID-19 patients-specifically, those with comorbidities. This paper begins by presenting the four pathways that can lead to heart and brain injuries following a COVID-19 infection. Our survey also offers insights into the role that imaging can play in the treatment of comorbid patients, based on probabilities derived from COVID-19 symptom statistics. Such symptoms include myocardial injury, hypoxia, plaque rupture, arrhythmias, venous thromboembolism, coronary thrombosis, encephalitis, ischemia, inflammation, and lung injury. At its core, this study considers the role of image-based AI, which can be used to characterize the tissues of a COVID-19 patient and classify the severity of their infection. Image-based AI is more important than ever as the pandemic surges and countries worldwide grapple with limited medical resources for detection and diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA; Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, AP, India
| | | | - Misha Majhail
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA; Oakmont High School and AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology - AOU of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | | | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Paramjit S Chadha
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology,Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Miguel Sanches
- Institute of Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - David W Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Vikas Agarwal
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK; Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Mustafa Al Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ajit Saxena
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Dept. of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | | | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wivern: a Web-Based System Enabling Computer-Aided Diagnosis and Interdisciplinary Expert Collaboration for Vascular Research. J Med Biol Eng 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40846-017-0256-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
15
|
Computer-aided diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction using ultrasound images with DWT, GLCM and HOS methods: A comparative study. Comput Biol Med 2015; 62:86-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2014] [Revised: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|