1
|
Singh J, Khanna NN, Rout RK, Singh N, Laird JR, Singh IM, Kalra MK, Mantella LE, Johri AM, Isenovic ER, Fouda MM, Saba L, Fatemi M, Suri JS. GeneAI 3.0: powerful, novel, generalized hybrid and ensemble deep learning frameworks for miRNA species classification of stationary patterns from nucleotides. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7154. [PMID: 38531923 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56786-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Due to the intricate relationship between the small non-coding ribonucleic acid (miRNA) sequences, the classification of miRNA species, namely Human, Gorilla, Rat, and Mouse is challenging. Previous methods are not robust and accurate. In this study, we present AtheroPoint's GeneAI 3.0, a powerful, novel, and generalized method for extracting features from the fixed patterns of purines and pyrimidines in each miRNA sequence in ensemble paradigms in machine learning (EML) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning (EDL) frameworks. GeneAI 3.0 utilized five conventional (Entropy, Dissimilarity, Energy, Homogeneity, and Contrast), and three contemporary (Shannon entropy, Hurst exponent, Fractal dimension) features, to generate a composite feature set from given miRNA sequences which were then passed into our ML and DL classification framework. A set of 11 new classifiers was designed consisting of 5 EML and 6 EDL for binary/multiclass classification. It was benchmarked against 9 solo ML (SML), 6 solo DL (SDL), 12 hybrid DL (HDL) models, resulting in a total of 11 + 27 = 38 models were designed. Four hypotheses were formulated and validated using explainable AI (XAI) as well as reliability/statistical tests. The order of the mean performance using accuracy (ACC)/area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the 24 DL classifiers was: EDL > HDL > SDL. The mean performance of EDL models with CNN layers was superior to that without CNN layers by 0.73%/0.92%. Mean performance of EML models was superior to SML models with improvements of ACC/AUC by 6.24%/6.46%. EDL models performed significantly better than EML models, with a mean increase in ACC/AUC of 7.09%/6.96%. The GeneAI 3.0 tool produced expected XAI feature plots, and the statistical tests showed significant p-values. Ensemble models with composite features are highly effective and generalized models for effectively classifying miRNA sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaskaran Singh
- Department of Computer Science, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Ranjeet K Rout
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, NIT Srinagar, Hazratbal, Srinagar, India
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Inder M Singh
- Advanced Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Mannudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Laura E Mantella
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Laboratory for Molecular Genetics and Radiobiology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Neurology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kumari V, Kumar N, Kumar K S, Kumar A, Skandha SS, Saxena S, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Singh N, Fouda MM, Saba L, Singh R, Suri JS. Deep Learning Paradigm and Its Bias for Coronary Artery Wall Segmentation in Intravascular Ultrasound Scans: A Closer Look. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:485. [PMID: 38132653 PMCID: PMC10743870 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10120485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION Coronary artery disease (CAD) has the highest mortality rate; therefore, its diagnosis is vital. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a high-resolution imaging solution that can image coronary arteries, but the diagnosis software via wall segmentation and quantification has been evolving. In this study, a deep learning (DL) paradigm was explored along with its bias. METHODS Using a PRISMA model, 145 best UNet-based and non-UNet-based methods for wall segmentation were selected and analyzed for their characteristics and scientific and clinical validation. This study computed the coronary wall thickness by estimating the inner and outer borders of the coronary artery IVUS cross-sectional scans. Further, the review explored the bias in the DL system for the first time when it comes to wall segmentation in IVUS scans. Three bias methods, namely (i) ranking, (ii) radial, and (iii) regional area, were applied and compared using a Venn diagram. Finally, the study presented explainable AI (XAI) paradigms in the DL framework. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS UNet provides a powerful paradigm for the segmentation of coronary walls in IVUS scans due to its ability to extract automated features at different scales in encoders, reconstruct the segmented image using decoders, and embed the variants in skip connections. Most of the research was hampered by a lack of motivation for XAI and pruned AI (PAI) models. None of the UNet models met the criteria for bias-free design. For clinical assessment and settings, it is necessary to move from a paper-to-practice approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vandana Kumari
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India; (V.K.); (S.K.K.)
| | - Naresh Kumar
- Department of Applied Computational Science and Engineering, G L Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Sampath Kumar K
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India; (V.K.); (S.K.K.)
| | - Ashish Kumar
- School of CSET, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India;
| | - Sanagala S. Skandha
- Department of CSE, CMR College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad 501401, India;
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar 751003, India;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Rajesh Singh
- Department of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostics and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India
- Monitoring and Diagnosis Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khanna NN, Singh M, Maindarkar M, Kumar A, Johri AM, Mentella L, Laird JR, Paraskevas KI, Ruzsa Z, Singh N, Kalra MK, Fernandes JFE, Chaturvedi S, Nicolaides A, Rathore V, Singh I, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Isenovic ER, Viswanathan V, Khanna P, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. Polygenic Risk Score for Cardiovascular Diseases in Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Review. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e395. [PMID: 38013648 PMCID: PMC10681845 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) related mortality and morbidity heavily strain society. The relationship between external risk factors and our genetics have not been well established. It is widely acknowledged that environmental influence and individual behaviours play a significant role in CVD vulnerability, leading to the development of polygenic risk scores (PRS). We employed the PRISMA search method to locate pertinent research and literature to extensively review artificial intelligence (AI)-based PRS models for CVD risk prediction. Furthermore, we analyzed and compared conventional vs. AI-based solutions for PRS. We summarized the recent advances in our understanding of the use of AI-based PRS for risk prediction of CVD. Our study proposes three hypotheses: i) Multiple genetic variations and risk factors can be incorporated into AI-based PRS to improve the accuracy of CVD risk predicting. ii) AI-based PRS for CVD circumvents the drawbacks of conventional PRS calculators by incorporating a larger variety of genetic and non-genetic components, allowing for more precise and individualised risk estimations. iii) Using AI approaches, it is possible to significantly reduce the dimensionality of huge genomic datasets, resulting in more accurate and effective disease risk prediction models. Our study highlighted that the AI-PRS model outperformed traditional PRS calculators in predicting CVD risk. Furthermore, using AI-based methods to calculate PRS may increase the precision of risk predictions for CVD and have significant ramifications for individualized prevention and treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
| | - Manasvi Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- Bennett University, Greater Noida, India
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- School of Bioengineering Sciences and Research, Maharashtra Institute of Technology's Art, Design and Technology University, Pune, India
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Laura Mentella
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA, USA
| | | | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
| | | | | | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Inder Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mostafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of The Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Beograd, Serbia
| | | | - Puneet Khanna
- Department of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, India
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
- Department of Computer Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Maini M, Maindarkar M, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Misra DP, Johri AM, Mantella L, Agarwal V, Sharma A, Singh IM, Tsoulfas G, Laird JR, Faa G, Teji J, Turk M, Viskovic K, Ruzsa Z, Mavrogeni S, Rathore V, Miner M, Kalra MK, Isenovic ER, Saba L, Fouda MM, Suri JS. Artificial intelligence-based preventive, personalized and precision medicine for cardiovascular disease/stroke risk assessment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a narrative review. Rheumatol Int 2023; 43:1965-1982. [PMID: 37648884 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05415-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
The challenges associated with diagnosing and treating cardiovascular disease (CVD)/Stroke in Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) arise from the delayed onset of symptoms. Existing clinical risk scores are inadequate in predicting cardiac events, and conventional risk factors alone do not accurately classify many individuals at risk. Several CVD biomarkers consider the multiple pathways involved in the development of atherosclerosis, which is the primary cause of CVD/Stroke in RA. To enhance the accuracy of CVD/Stroke risk assessment in the RA framework, a proposed approach involves combining genomic-based biomarkers (GBBM) derived from plasma and/or serum samples with innovative non-invasive radiomic-based biomarkers (RBBM), such as measurements of synovial fluid, plaque area, and plaque burden. This review presents two hypotheses: (i) RBBM and GBBM biomarkers exhibit a significant correlation and can precisely detect the severity of CVD/Stroke in RA patients. (ii) Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based preventive, precision, and personalized (aiP3) CVD/Stroke risk AtheroEdge™ model (AtheroPoint™, CA, USA) that utilizes deep learning (DL) to accurately classify the risk of CVD/stroke in RA framework. The authors conducted a comprehensive search using the PRISMA technique, identifying 153 studies that assessed the features/biomarkers of RBBM and GBBM for CVD/Stroke. The study demonstrates how DL models can be integrated into the AtheroEdge™-aiP3 framework to determine the risk of CVD/Stroke in RA patients. The findings of this review suggest that the combination of RBBM with GBBM introduces a new dimension to the assessment of CVD/Stroke risk in the RA framework. Synovial fluid levels that are higher than normal lead to an increase in the plaque burden. Additionally, the review provides recommendations for novel, unbiased, and pruned DL algorithms that can predict CVD/Stroke risk within a RA framework that is preventive, precise, and personalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON, L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, 110001, India
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, DY1 2HQ, UK
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Asia Pacific Vascular Society, New Delhi, 110001, India
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, 110001, India
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Laura Mantella
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, SGPIMS, Lucknow, 226014, India
| | - Aman Sharma
- Department of Immunology, SGPIMS, Lucknow, 226014, India
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, 94574, USA
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09124, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, UHID, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, Athens, Greece
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, 95823, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI, 02906, USA
| | - Manudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saba L, Maindarkar M, Khanna NN, Johri AM, Mantella L, Laird JR, Paraskevas KI, Ruzsa Z, Kalra MK, Fernandes JFE, Chaturvedi S, Nicolaides A, Rathore V, Singh N, Fouda MM, Isenovic ER, Al-Maini M, Viswanathan V, Suri JS. A Pharmaceutical Paradigm for Cardiovascular Composite Risk Assessment Using Novel Radiogenomics Risk Predictors in Precision Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework: Clinical Trial Tool. FRONT BIOSCI-LANDMRK 2023; 28:248. [PMID: 37919080 DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2810248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is challenging to diagnose and treat since symptoms appear late during the progression of atherosclerosis. Conventional risk factors alone are not always sufficient to properly categorize at-risk patients, and clinical risk scores are inadequate in predicting cardiac events. Integrating genomic-based biomarkers (GBBM) found in plasma/serum samples with novel non-invasive radiomics-based biomarkers (RBBM) such as plaque area, plaque burden, and maximum plaque height can improve composite CVD risk prediction in the pharmaceutical paradigm. These biomarkers consider several pathways involved in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis disease leading to CVD. OBJECTIVE This review proposes two hypotheses: (i) The composite biomarkers are strongly correlated and can be used to detect the severity of CVD/Stroke precisely, and (ii) an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)-based composite risk CVD/Stroke model with survival analysis using deep learning (DL) can predict in preventive, precision, and personalized (aiP3) framework benefiting the pharmaceutical paradigm. METHOD The PRISMA search technique resulted in 214 studies assessing composite biomarkers using radiogenomics for CVD/Stroke. The study presents a XAI model using AtheroEdgeTM 4.0 to determine the risk of CVD/Stroke in the pharmaceutical framework using the radiogenomics biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS Our observations suggest that the composite CVD risk biomarkers using radiogenomics provide a new dimension to CVD/Stroke risk assessment. The proposed review suggests a unique, unbiased, and XAI model based on AtheroEdgeTM 4.0 that can predict the composite risk of CVD/Stroke using radiogenomics in the pharmaceutical paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- School of Bioengineering Research and Sciences, Maharashtra Institute of Technology's Art, Design and Technology University, 412021 Pune, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, 110001 New Delhi, India
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 1C2, Canada
| | - Laura Mantella
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Kosmas I Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, 11526 Athens, Greece
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Manudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | | | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, 2368 Agios Dometios, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA 95823, USA
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, 248002 Uttarakhand, India
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, National Institute of The Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | | | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Computer Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, 248002 Dehradun, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanga P, Singh J, Dubey AK, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Faa G, Singh IM, Tsoulfas G, Kalra MK, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Rathore V, Agarwal V, Ahluwalia P, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. DermAI 1.0: A Robust, Generalized, and Novel Attention-Enabled Ensemble-Based Transfer Learning Paradigm for Multiclass Classification of Skin Lesion Images. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3159. [PMID: 37835902 PMCID: PMC10573070 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Skin lesion classification plays a crucial role in dermatology, aiding in the early detection, diagnosis, and management of life-threatening malignant lesions. However, standalone transfer learning (TL) models failed to deliver optimal performance. In this study, we present an attention-enabled ensemble-based deep learning technique, a powerful, novel, and generalized method for extracting features for the classification of skin lesions. This technique holds significant promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy by using seven pre-trained TL models for classification. Six ensemble-based DL (EBDL) models were created using stacking, softmax voting, and weighted average techniques. Furthermore, we investigated the attention mechanism as an effective paradigm and created seven attention-enabled transfer learning (aeTL) models before branching out to construct three attention-enabled ensemble-based DL (aeEBDL) models to create a reliable, adaptive, and generalized paradigm. The mean accuracy of the TL models is 95.30%, and the use of an ensemble-based paradigm increased it by 4.22%, to 99.52%. The aeTL models' performance was superior to the TL models in accuracy by 3.01%, and aeEBDL models outperformed aeTL models by 1.29%. Statistical tests show significant p-value and Kappa coefficient along with a 99.6% reliability index for the aeEBDL models. The approach is highly effective and generalized for the classification of skin lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabhav Sanga
- Department of Information Technology, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India; (P.S.); (A.K.D.)
- Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Jaskaran Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA (I.M.S.); (V.R.)
| | - Arun Kumar Dubey
- Department of Information Technology, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India; (P.S.); (A.K.D.)
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA (I.M.S.); (V.R.)
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Mannudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Department of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA (I.M.S.); (V.R.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Department of Uro Oncology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram 122001, India;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA (I.M.S.); (V.R.)
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Graphic Era University (G.E.U.), Dehradun 248002, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhagawati M, Paul S, Agarwal S, Protogeron A, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Tomazu O, Turk M, Faa G, Tsoulfas G, Laird JR, Rathore V, Johri AM, Viskovic K, Kalra M, Balestrieri A, Nicolaides A, Singh IM, Chaturvedi S, Paraskevas KI, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. Cardiovascular disease/stroke risk stratification in deep learning framework: a review. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2023; 13:557-598. [PMID: 37405023 PMCID: PMC10315429 DOI: 10.21037/cdt-22-438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
The global mortality rate is known to be the highest due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Thus, preventive, and early CVD risk identification in a non-invasive manner is vital as healthcare cost is increasing day by day. Conventional methods for risk prediction of CVD lack robustness due to the non-linear relationship between risk factors and cardiovascular events in multi-ethnic cohorts. Few recently proposed machine learning-based risk stratification reviews without deep learning (DL) integration. The proposed study focuses on CVD risk stratification by the use of techniques mainly solo deep learning (SDL) and hybrid deep learning (HDL). Using a PRISMA model, 286 DL-based CVD studies were selected and analyzed. The databases included were Science Direct, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and Google Scholar. This review is focused on different SDL and HDL architectures, their characteristics, applications, scientific and clinical validation, along with plaque tissue characterization for CVD/stroke risk stratification. Since signal processing methods are also crucial, the study further briefly presented Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based solutions. Finally, the study presented the risk due to bias in AI systems. The risk of bias tools used were (I) ranking method (RBS), (II) region-based map (RBM), (III) radial bias area (RBA), (IV) prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST), and (V) risk of bias in non-randomized studies-of interventions (ROBINS-I). The surrogate carotid ultrasound image was mostly used in the UNet-based DL framework for arterial wall segmentation. Ground truth (GT) selection is vital for reducing the risk of bias (RoB) for CVD risk stratification. It was observed that the convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were widely used since the feature extraction process was automated. The ensemble-based DL techniques for risk stratification in CVD are likely to supersede the SDL and HDL paradigms. Due to the reliability, high accuracy, and faster execution on dedicated hardware, these DL methods for CVD risk assessment are powerful and promising. The risk of bias in DL methods can be best reduced by considering multicentre data collection and clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA, USA
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur, India
| | - Athanasios Protogeron
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George D. Kitas
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Aditya M. Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Omerzu Tomazu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, A.O.U., di Cagliari -Polo di Monserrato s.s, Cagliari, Italy
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - John R. Laird
- Cardiology Department, St. Helena Hospital, St. Helena, CA, USA
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| | | | - Manudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology & Stroke Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, N. Iraklio, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dubey AK, Chabert GL, Carriero A, Pasche A, Danna PSC, Agarwal S, Mohanty L, Sharma N, Yadav S, Jain A, Kumar A, Kalra MK, Sobel DW, Laird JR, Singh IM, Singh N, Tsoulfas G, Fouda MM, Alizad A, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Kukuljan M, Al-Maini M, El-Baz A, Saba L, Suri JS. Ensemble Deep Learning Derived from Transfer Learning for Classification of COVID-19 Patients on Hybrid Deep-Learning-Based Lung Segmentation: A Data Augmentation and Balancing Framework. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111954. [PMID: 37296806 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION Lung computed tomography (CT) techniques are high-resolution and are well adopted in the intensive care unit (ICU) for COVID-19 disease control classification. Most artificial intelligence (AI) systems do not undergo generalization and are typically overfitted. Such trained AI systems are not practical for clinical settings and therefore do not give accurate results when executed on unseen data sets. We hypothesize that ensemble deep learning (EDL) is superior to deep transfer learning (TL) in both non-augmented and augmented frameworks. METHODOLOGY The system consists of a cascade of quality control, ResNet-UNet-based hybrid deep learning for lung segmentation, and seven models using TL-based classification followed by five types of EDL's. To prove our hypothesis, five different kinds of data combinations (DC) were designed using a combination of two multicenter cohorts-Croatia (80 COVID) and Italy (72 COVID and 30 controls)-leading to 12,000 CT slices. As part of generalization, the system was tested on unseen data and statistically tested for reliability/stability. RESULTS Using the K5 (80:20) cross-validation protocol on the balanced and augmented dataset, the five DC datasets improved TL mean accuracy by 3.32%, 6.56%, 12.96%, 47.1%, and 2.78%, respectively. The five EDL systems showed improvements in accuracy of 2.12%, 5.78%, 6.72%, 32.05%, and 2.40%, thus validating our hypothesis. All statistical tests proved positive for reliability and stability. CONCLUSION EDL showed superior performance to TL systems for both (a) unbalanced and unaugmented and (b) balanced and augmented datasets for both (i) seen and (ii) unseen paradigms, validating both our hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Kumar Dubey
- Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Gian Luca Chabert
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessio Pasche
- Department of Radiology, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Pietro S C Danna
- Department of Radiology, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Lopamudra Mohanty
- ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad 201009, India
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, India
| | - Sarita Yadav
- Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Achin Jain
- Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi 110063, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Mannudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - David W Sobel
- Men's Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Mostafa M Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Melita Kukuljan
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | - Ayman El-Baz
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09123 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shishehbor MH, Scheinert D, Jain A, Brodmann M, Tepe G, Ando K, Krishnan P, Iida O, Laird JR, Schneider PA, Rocha-Singh KJ, Zeller T. Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloons vs Bare-Metal Stents in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 81:237-249. [PMID: 36332764 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease has shifted toward drug-coated balloons (DCB). However, limited data are available regarding the safety and efficacy of DCB vs bare-metal stents (BMS). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare DCB vs BMS outcomes in a propensity-adjusted, pooled analysis of 4 prospective, multicenter trials. METHODS Patient-level data were pooled from 4 prospective, multicenter studies: the IN.PACT SFA I/II and IN.PACT SFA Japan randomized controlled DCB trials and the Complete SE and DURABILITY II single-arm BMS studies. Outcomes were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Clinical endpoints were 12-month primary patency, freedom from 36-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and cumulative 36-month major adverse events (MAE). RESULTS The primary analysis included 771 patients (288 DCB, 483 BMS). IPTW-adjusted demographic, baseline lesion, and procedural characteristics were matched between groups. The adjusted mean lesion length was 8.1 ± 4.7 cm DCB and 7.9 ± 4.5 cm BMS. The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month primary patency (90.4% DCB, 80.9% BMS, P = 0.007), freedom from 36-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization (85.6% DCB, 73.7% BMS, P = 0.001), and cumulative incidence of 36-month MAE (25.3% DCB, 38.8% BMS, P < 0.001) favored DCB. There were no statistically significant differences observed in all-cause mortality, target limb major amputation, or thrombosis through 36 months. CONCLUSIONS In a patient-level, IPTW-adjusted pooled analysis of prospective, multicenter pivotal studies, DCB demonstrated significantly higher patency, lower revascularization and MAE rates, and no statistically significant differences in mortality, amputation, or thrombosis vs BMS. This analysis supports DCB use vs BMS in moderately complex femoropopliteal lesions amenable to both treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi H Shishehbor
- University Hospitals Health System, Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| | | | - Ashit Jain
- Mission Cardiovascular Research Institute, Fremont, California, USA
| | | | | | | | - Prakash Krishnan
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Osamu Iida
- Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - John R Laird
- Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena, California, USA
| | - Peter A Schneider
- Kaiser Permanente, Moanalua Medical Center and Clinic, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA (current address: University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA)
| | - Krishna J Rocha-Singh
- Department of Cardiology, Prairie Heart Institute at St. John's Hospital, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Thomas Zeller
- Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johri AM, Singh KV, Mantella LE, Saba L, Sharma A, Laird JR, Utkarsh K, Singh IM, Gupta S, Kalra MS, Suri JS. Deep learning artificial intelligence framework for multiclass coronary artery disease prediction using combination of conventional risk factors, carotid ultrasound, and intraplaque neovascularization. Comput Biol Med 2022; 150:106018. [PMID: 36174330 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major healthcare challenge and therefore early risk assessment is vital. Previous assessment techniques use either "conventional CVD risk calculators (CCVRC)" or machine learning (ML) paradigms. These techniques are ad-hoc, unreliable, not fully automated, and have variabilities. We, therefore, introduce AtheroEdge-MCDLAI (AE3.0DL) windows-based platform using multiclass Deep Learning (DL) system. METHODS Data was collected on 500 patients having both carotid ultrasound and corresponding coronary angiography scores (CAS), measured as stenosis in coronary arteries and considered as the gold standard. A total of 39 covariates were used, clubbed into three clusters, namely (i) Office-based: age, gender, body mass index, smoker, hypertension, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure; (ii) Laboratory-based: Hyperlipidemia, hemoglobin A1c, and estimated glomerular filtration rate; and (iii) Carotid ultrasound image phenotypes: maximum plaque height, total plaque area, and intra-plaque neovascularization. Baseline characteristics for four classes (target labels) having significant (p < 0.0001) values were calculated using Chi-square and ANOVA. For handling the cohort's imbalance in the risk classes, AE3.0DL used the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE). AE3.0DL used Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) DL models and the performance (accuracy and area-under-the-curve) was computed using 10-fold cross-validation (90% training, 10% testing) frameworks. AE3.0DL was validated and benchmarked. RESULTS The AE3.0DL using RNN and LSTM showed an accuracy and AUC (p < 0.0001) pairs as (95.00% and 0.98), and (95.34% and 0.99), respectively, and showed an improvement of 32.93% and 9.94% against CCVRC and ML, respectively. AE3.0DL runs in <1 s. CONCLUSION DL algorithms are a powerful paradigm for coronary artery disease (CAD) risk prediction and CVD risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laura E Mantella
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Suneet Gupta
- Department of Computer Science, Bennett University, Gr. Noida, India
| | - Manudeep S Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA; Knowledge Engineering Center, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jena B, Saxena S, Nayak GK, Balestrieri A, Gupta N, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Kalra MK, Fouda MM, Saba L, Suri JS. Brain Tumor Characterization Using Radiogenomics in Artificial Intelligence Framework. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:4052. [PMID: 36011048 PMCID: PMC9406706 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14164052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain tumor characterization (BTC) is the process of knowing the underlying cause of brain tumors and their characteristics through various approaches such as tumor segmentation, classification, detection, and risk analysis. The substantial brain tumor characterization includes the identification of the molecular signature of various useful genomes whose alteration causes the brain tumor. The radiomics approach uses the radiological image for disease characterization by extracting quantitative radiomics features in the artificial intelligence (AI) environment. However, when considering a higher level of disease characteristics such as genetic information and mutation status, the combined study of "radiomics and genomics" has been considered under the umbrella of "radiogenomics". Furthermore, AI in a radiogenomics' environment offers benefits/advantages such as the finalized outcome of personalized treatment and individualized medicine. The proposed study summarizes the brain tumor's characterization in the prospect of an emerging field of research, i.e., radiomics and radiogenomics in an AI environment, with the help of statistical observation and risk-of-bias (RoB) analysis. The PRISMA search approach was used to find 121 relevant studies for the proposed review using IEEE, Google Scholar, PubMed, MDPI, and Scopus. Our findings indicate that both radiomics and radiogenomics have been successfully applied aggressively to several oncology applications with numerous advantages. Furthermore, under the AI paradigm, both the conventional and deep radiomics features have made an impact on the favorable outcomes of the radiogenomics approach of BTC. Furthermore, risk-of-bias (RoB) analysis offers a better understanding of the architectures with stronger benefits of AI by providing the bias involved in them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biswajit Jena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India
| | - Gopal Krishna Nayak
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India
| | | | - Neha Gupta
- Department of IT, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, New Delhi 110056, India
| | - Narinder N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, AOU, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnosis and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Saba L, Chabert GL, Carriero A, Paschè A, Danna P, Mehmedović A, Faa G, Jujaray T, Singh IM, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Sfikakis PP, Agarwal V, Teji JS, R Yadav R, Nagy F, Kincses ZT, Ruzsa Z, Viskovic K, Kalra MK. Multicenter Study on COVID-19 Lung Computed Tomography Segmentation with varying Glass Ground Opacities using Unseen Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Paradigms: COVLIAS 1.0 Validation. J Med Syst 2022; 46:62. [PMID: 35988110 PMCID: PMC9392994 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-022-01850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Variations in COVID-19 lesions such as glass ground opacities (GGO), consolidations, and crazy paving can compromise the ability of solo-deep learning (SDL) or hybrid-deep learning (HDL) artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting automated COVID-19 lung segmentation in Computed Tomography (CT) from unseen data leading to poor clinical manifestations. As the first study of its kind, “COVLIAS 1.0-Unseen” proves two hypotheses, (i) contrast adjustment is vital for AI, and (ii) HDL is superior to SDL. In a multicenter study, 10,000 CT slices were collected from 72 Italian (ITA) patients with low-GGO, and 80 Croatian (CRO) patients with high-GGO. Hounsfield Units (HU) were automatically adjusted to train the AI models and predict from test data, leading to four combinations—two Unseen sets: (i) train-CRO:test-ITA, (ii) train-ITA:test-CRO, and two Seen sets: (iii) train-CRO:test-CRO, (iv) train-ITA:test-ITA. COVILAS used three SDL models: PSPNet, SegNet, UNet and six HDL models: VGG-PSPNet, VGG-SegNet, VGG-UNet, ResNet-PSPNet, ResNet-SegNet, and ResNet-UNet. Two trained, blinded senior radiologists conducted ground truth annotations. Five types of performance metrics were used to validate COVLIAS 1.0-Unseen which was further benchmarked against MedSeg, an open-source web-based system. After HU adjustment for DS and JI, HDL (Unseen AI) > SDL (Unseen AI) by 4% and 5%, respectively. For CC, HDL (Unseen AI) > SDL (Unseen AI) by 6%. The COVLIAS-MedSeg difference was < 5%, meeting regulatory guidelines.Unseen AI was successfully demonstrated using automated HU adjustment. HDL was found to be superior to SDL.
Collapse
|
13
|
Khanna NN, Maindarkar M, Puvvula A, Paul S, Bhagawati M, Ahluwalia P, Ruzsa Z, Sharma A, Munjral S, Kolluri R, Krishnan PR, Singh IM, Laird JR, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Dhanjil SK, Saba L, Balestrieri A, Faa G, Paraskevas KI, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Sharma A, Teji J, Al-Maini M, Nicolaides A, Rathore V, Naidu S, Liblik K, Johri AM, Turk M, Sobel DW, Pareek G, Miner M, Viskovic K, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou AD, Mavrogeni S, Kitas GD, Fouda MM, Kalra MK, Suri JS. Vascular Implications of COVID-19: Role of Radiological Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, and Tissue Characterization: A Special Report. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022; 9:jcdd9080268. [PMID: 36005433 PMCID: PMC9409845 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9080268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused a pandemic, infecting nearly 80 million people worldwide, with mortality exceeding six million. The average survival span is just 14 days from the time the symptoms become aggressive. The present study delineates the deep-driven vascular damage in the pulmonary, renal, coronary, and carotid vessels due to SARS-CoV-2. This special report addresses an important gap in the literature in understanding (i) the pathophysiology of vascular damage and the role of medical imaging in the visualization of the damage caused by SARS-CoV-2, and (ii) further understanding the severity of COVID-19 using artificial intelligence (AI)-based tissue characterization (TC). PRISMA was used to select 296 studies for AI-based TC. Radiological imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound were selected for imaging of the vasculature infected by COVID-19. Four kinds of hypotheses are presented for showing the vascular damage in radiological images due to COVID-19. Three kinds of AI models, namely, machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning, are used for TC. Further, the study presents recommendations for improving AI-based architectures for vascular studies. We conclude that the process of vascular damage due to COVID-19 has similarities across vessel types, even though it results in multi-organ dysfunction. Although the mortality rate is ~2% of those infected, the long-term effect of COVID-19 needs monitoring to avoid deaths. AI seems to be penetrating the health care industry at warp speed, and we expect to see an emerging role in patient care, reduce the mortality and morbidity rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Annu’s Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore 524101, India
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi 110017, India
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
| | - Smiksha Munjral
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Raghu Kolluri
- Ohio Health Heart and Vascular, Columbus, OH 43214, USA
| | | | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Surinder K. Dhanjil
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 40138 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Aman Sharma
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, 2408 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA 95119, USA
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
| | - Kiera Liblik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - David W. Sobel
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Athanasios D. Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, 17674 Athens, Greece
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-916-749-5628
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Agarwal M, Agarwal S, Saba L, Chabert GL, Gupta S, Carriero A, Pasche A, Danna P, Mehmedovic A, Faa G, Shrivastava S, Jain K, Jain H, Jujaray T, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Sobel DW, Miner M, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Yadav RR, Nagy F, Kincses ZT, Ruzsa Z, Naidu S, Viskovic K, Kalra MK, Suri JS. Eight pruning deep learning models for low storage and high-speed COVID-19 computed tomography lung segmentation and heatmap-based lesion localization: A multicenter study using COVLIAS 2.0. Comput Biol Med 2022; 146:105571. [PMID: 35751196 PMCID: PMC9123805 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVLIAS 1.0: an automated lung segmentation was designed for COVID-19 diagnosis. It has issues related to storage space and speed. This study shows that COVLIAS 2.0 uses pruned AI (PAI) networks for improving both storage and speed, wiliest high performance on lung segmentation and lesion localization. METHOD ology: The proposed study uses multicenter ∼9,000 CT slices from two different nations, namely, CroMed from Croatia (80 patients, experimental data), and NovMed from Italy (72 patients, validation data). We hypothesize that by using pruning and evolutionary optimization algorithms, the size of the AI models can be reduced significantly, ensuring optimal performance. Eight different pruning techniques (i) differential evolution (DE), (ii) genetic algorithm (GA), (iii) particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO), and (iv) whale optimization algorithm (WO) in two deep learning frameworks (i) Fully connected network (FCN) and (ii) SegNet were designed. COVLIAS 2.0 was validated using "Unseen NovMed" and benchmarked against MedSeg. Statistical tests for stability and reliability were also conducted. RESULTS Pruning algorithms (i) FCN-DE, (ii) FCN-GA, (iii) FCN-PSO, and (iv) FCN-WO showed improvement in storage by 92.4%, 95.3%, 98.7%, and 99.8% respectively when compared against solo FCN, and (v) SegNet-DE, (vi) SegNet-GA, (vii) SegNet-PSO, and (viii) SegNet-WO showed improvement by 97.1%, 97.9%, 98.8%, and 99.2% respectively when compared against solo SegNet. AUC > 0.94 (p < 0.0001) on CroMed and > 0.86 (p < 0.0001) on NovMed data set for all eight EA model. PAI <0.25 s per image. DenseNet-121-based Grad-CAM heatmaps showed validation on glass ground opacity lesions. CONCLUSIONS Eight PAI networks that were successfully validated are five times faster, storage efficient, and could be used in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Agarwal
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, India
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur, India; Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Chabert
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Suneet Gupta
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, India
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessio Pasche
- Depart of Radiology, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Novara, Italy
| | - Pietro Danna
- Depart of Radiology, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology - AOU of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Saurabh Shrivastava
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, 244001, India
| | - Kanishka Jain
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, 244001, India
| | - Harsh Jain
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, 244001, India
| | - Tanay Jujaray
- Dept of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - David W Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK; Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Jagjit S Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and Univ. of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Dept. of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Frence Nagy
- Department of Radiology, University of Szeged, 6725, Hungary
| | | | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| | | | - Manudeep K Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, 244001, India; Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Chabert GL, Carriero A, Paschè A, Danna PSC, Saba L, Mehmedović A, Faa G, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou AD, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Nagy F, Ruzsa Z, Fouda MM, Naidu S, Viskovic K, Kalra MK. COVLIAS 1.0 Lesion vs. MedSeg: An Artificial Intelligence Framework for Automated Lesion Segmentation in COVID-19 Lung Computed Tomography Scans. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051283. [PMID: 35626438 PMCID: PMC9141749 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 is a disease with multiple variants, and is quickly spreading throughout the world. It is crucial to identify patients who are suspected of having COVID-19 early, because the vaccine is not readily available in certain parts of the world. Methodology: Lung computed tomography (CT) imaging can be used to diagnose COVID-19 as an alternative to the RT-PCR test in some cases. The occurrence of ground-glass opacities in the lung region is a characteristic of COVID-19 in chest CT scans, and these are daunting to locate and segment manually. The proposed study consists of a combination of solo deep learning (DL) and hybrid DL (HDL) models to tackle the lesion location and segmentation more quickly. One DL and four HDL models—namely, PSPNet, VGG-SegNet, ResNet-SegNet, VGG-UNet, and ResNet-UNet—were trained by an expert radiologist. The training scheme adopted a fivefold cross-validation strategy on a cohort of 3000 images selected from a set of 40 COVID-19-positive individuals. Results: The proposed variability study uses tracings from two trained radiologists as part of the validation. Five artificial intelligence (AI) models were benchmarked against MedSeg. The best AI model, ResNet-UNet, was superior to MedSeg by 9% and 15% for Dice and Jaccard, respectively, when compared against MD 1, and by 4% and 8%, respectively, when compared against MD 2. Statistical tests—namely, the Mann−Whitney test, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon test—demonstrated its stability and reliability, with p < 0.0001. The online system for each slice was <1 s. Conclusions: The AI models reliably located and segmented COVID-19 lesions in CT scans. The COVLIAS 1.0Lesion lesion locator passed the intervariability test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(916)-749-5628
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Gian Luca Chabert
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale (UPO), Via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Alessio Paschè
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Pietro S. C. Danna
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Armin Mehmedović
- University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (A.M.); (K.V.)
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 17674 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (G.L.C.); (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Athanasios D. Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2408, Cyprus;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.K.D.); (V.R.)
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Ferenc Nagy
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (A.M.); (K.V.)
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Khanna NN, Maindarkar M, Saxena A, Ahluwalia P, Paul S, Srivastava SK, Cuadrado-Godia E, Sharma A, Omerzu T, Saba L, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Kitas GD, Fatemi M, Barqawi AB, Miner M, Singh IM, Johri A, Kalra MM, Agarwal V, Paraskevas KI, Teji JS, Fouda MM, Pareek G, Suri JS. Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Assessment in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction-A Role of Carotid Wall Arterial Imaging and Plaque Tissue Characterization Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:1249. [PMID: 35626404 PMCID: PMC9141739 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of erectile dysfunction (ED) has recently shown an association with the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) via the atherosclerotic pathway. Cardiovascular disease (CVD)/stroke risk has been widely understood with the help of carotid artery disease (CTAD), a surrogate biomarker for CHD. The proposed study emphasizes artificial intelligence-based frameworks such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) that can accurately predict the severity of CVD/stroke risk using carotid wall arterial imaging in ED patients. METHODS Using the PRISMA model, 231 of the best studies were selected. The proposed study mainly consists of two components: (i) the pathophysiology of ED and its link with coronary artery disease (COAD) and CHD in the ED framework and (ii) the ultrasonic-image morphological changes in the carotid arterial walls by quantifying the wall parameters and the characterization of the wall tissue by adapting the ML/DL-based methods, both for the prediction of the severity of CVD risk. The proposed study analyzes the hypothesis that ML/DL can lead to an accurate and early diagnosis of the CVD/stroke risk in ED patients. Our finding suggests that the routine ED patient practice can be amended for ML/DL-based CVD/stroke risk assessment using carotid wall arterial imaging leading to fast, reliable, and accurate CVD/stroke risk stratification. SUMMARY We conclude that ML and DL methods are very powerful tools for the characterization of CVD/stroke in patients with varying ED conditions. We anticipate a rapid growth of these tools for early and better CVD/stroke risk management in ED patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - Mahesh Maindarkar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.M.); (S.P.)
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
| | - Ajit Saxena
- Department of Urology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi 110017, India;
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.M.); (S.P.)
| | - Saurabh K. Srivastava
- College of Computing Sciences and IT, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad 244001, India;
| | - Elisa Cuadrado-Godia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, 08003 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA;
| | - Tomaz Omerzu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (T.O.); (M.T.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, 176 74 Athens, Greece;
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (T.O.); (M.T.)
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, NY 55905, USA;
| | - Al Baha Barqawi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Centre, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
| | - Amer Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | | | - Vikas Agarwal
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, 106 80 Athens, Greece;
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Suri JS, Paul S, Maindarkar MA, Puvvula A, Saxena S, Saba L, Turk M, Laird JR, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Singh IM, Kalra M, Krishnan PR, Johri A, Paraskevas KI. Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Stratification in Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Atherosclerosis Pathway and Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Systematic Review. Metabolites 2022; 12:metabo12040312. [PMID: 35448500 PMCID: PMC9033076 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12040312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a severe, incurable, and costly condition leading to heart failure. The link between PD and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is not available, leading to controversies and poor prognosis. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has already shown promise for CVD/stroke risk stratification. However, due to a lack of sample size, comorbidity, insufficient validation, clinical examination, and a lack of big data configuration, there have been no well-explained bias-free AI investigations to establish the CVD/Stroke risk stratification in the PD framework. The study has two objectives: (i) to establish a solid link between PD and CVD/stroke; and (ii) to use the AI paradigm to examine a well-defined CVD/stroke risk stratification in the PD framework. The PRISMA search strategy selected 223 studies for CVD/stroke risk, of which 54 and 44 studies were related to the link between PD-CVD, and PD-stroke, respectively, 59 studies for joint PD-CVD-Stroke framework, and 66 studies were only for the early PD diagnosis without CVD/stroke link. Sequential biological links were used for establishing the hypothesis. For AI design, PD risk factors as covariates along with CVD/stroke as the gold standard were used for predicting the CVD/stroke risk. The most fundamental cause of CVD/stroke damage due to PD is cardiac autonomic dysfunction due to neurodegeneration that leads to heart failure and its edema, and this validated our hypothesis. Finally, we present the novel AI solutions for CVD/stroke risk prediction in the PD framework. The study also recommends strategies for removing the bias in AI for CVD/stroke risk prediction using the PD framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (A.P.); (I.M.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(916)-749-5628
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (S.P.); (M.A.M.)
| | - Maheshrao A. Maindarkar
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (S.P.); (M.A.M.)
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (A.P.); (I.M.S.)
- Annu’s Hospitals for Skin & Diabetes, Gudur 524101, India
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhuneshwar 751003, India;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, 09121 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Monika Turk
- Deparment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 1262 Maribor, Slovenia;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110001, India;
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (A.P.); (I.M.S.)
| | - Mannudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | | | - Amer Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, 106 80 Athens, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Suri JS, Bhagawati M, Paul S, Protogerou AD, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Saxena S, Faa G, Laird JR, Johri AM, Kalra MK, Paraskevas KI, Saba L. A Powerful Paradigm for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Multiclass, Multi-Label, and Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Paradigms: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030722. [PMID: 35328275 PMCID: PMC8947682 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Motivation: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) causes the highest mortality globally. With escalating healthcare costs, early non-invasive CVD risk assessment is vital. Conventional methods have shown poor performance compared to more recent and fast-evolving Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods. The proposed study reviews the three most recent paradigms for CVD risk assessment, namely multiclass, multi-label, and ensemble-based methods in (i) office-based and (ii) stress-test laboratories. Methods: A total of 265 CVD-based studies were selected using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) model. Due to its popularity and recent development, the study analyzed the above three paradigms using machine learning (ML) frameworks. We review comprehensively these three methods using attributes, such as architecture, applications, pro-and-cons, scientific validation, clinical evaluation, and AI risk-of-bias (RoB) in the CVD framework. These ML techniques were then extended under mobile and cloud-based infrastructure. Findings: Most popular biomarkers used were office-based, laboratory-based, image-based phenotypes, and medication usage. Surrogate carotid scanning for coronary artery risk prediction had shown promising results. Ground truth (GT) selection for AI-based training along with scientific and clinical validation is very important for CVD stratification to avoid RoB. It was observed that the most popular classification paradigm is multiclass followed by the ensemble, and multi-label. The use of deep learning techniques in CVD risk stratification is in a very early stage of development. Mobile and cloud-based AI technologies are more likely to be the future. Conclusions: AI-based methods for CVD risk assessment are most promising and successful. Choice of GT is most vital in AI-based models to prevent the RoB. The amalgamation of image-based strategies with conventional risk factors provides the highest stability when using the three CVD paradigms in non-cloud and cloud-based frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(916)-749-5628
| | - Mrinalini Bhagawati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Sudip Paul
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India; (M.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Athanasios D. Protogerou
- Research Unit Clinic, Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - George D. Kitas
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester University, Manchester 46962, UK;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110020, India;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Department of Internal Medicines, Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Aditya M. Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA;
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of CSE, International Institute of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, A.O.U., di Cagliari-Polo di Monserrato s.s., 09045 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - John R. Laird
- Cardiology Department, St. Helena Hospital, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Manudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Kosmas I. Paraskevas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Central Clinic of Athens, N. Iraklio, 14122 Athens, Greece;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U., di Cagliari-Polo di Monserrato s.s., 09045 Cagliari, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Suri JS, Bhagawati M, Paul S, Protogeron A, Sfikakis PP, Kitas GD, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Saxena S, Faa G, Paraskevas KI, Laird JR, Johri AM, Saba L, Kalra M. Understanding the bias in machine learning systems for cardiovascular disease risk assessment: The first of its kind review. Comput Biol Med 2022; 142:105204. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
|
20
|
Konstantonis G, Singh KV, Sfikakis PP, Jamthikar AD, Kitas GD, Gupta SK, Saba L, Verrou K, Khanna NN, Ruzsa Z, Sharma AM, Laird JR, Johri AM, Kalra M, Protogerou A, Suri JS. Cardiovascular disease detection using machine learning and carotid/femoral arterial imaging frameworks in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42:215-239. [PMID: 35013839 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-05062-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The study proposes a novel machine learning (ML) paradigm for cardiovascular disease (CVD) detection in individuals at medium to high cardiovascular risk using data from a Greek cohort of 542 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, or diabetes mellitus, and/or arterial hypertension, using conventional or office-based, laboratory-based blood biomarkers and carotid/femoral ultrasound image-based phenotypes. Two kinds of data (CVD risk factors and presence of CVD-defined as stroke, or myocardial infarction, or coronary artery syndrome, or peripheral artery disease, or coronary heart disease) as ground truth, were collected at two-time points: (i) at visit 1 and (ii) at visit 2 after 3 years. The CVD risk factors were divided into three clusters (conventional or office-based, laboratory-based blood biomarkers, carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes) to study their effect on the ML classifiers. Three kinds of ML classifiers (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Linear Discriminant Analysis) were applied in a two-fold cross-validation framework using the data augmented by synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) strategy. The performance of the ML classifiers was recorded. In this cohort with overall 46 CVD risk factors (covariates) implemented in an online cardiovascular framework, that requires calculation time less than 1 s per patient, a mean accuracy and area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 98.40% and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) for CVD presence detection at visit 1, and 98.39% and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) at visit 2, respectively. The performance of the cardiovascular framework was significantly better than the classical CVD risk score. The ML paradigm proved to be powerful for CVD prediction in individuals at medium to high cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Konstantonis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Research Scientist, AtheroPoint™, USA, Roseville, CA, USA.,Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, M13, UK
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- Department of Computer Science, Bennett University, Gr. Noida, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Kleio Verrou
- Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Department of Internal Medicines, Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Manudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Carriero A, Paschè A, Danna PSC, Columbu M, Saba L, Viskovic K, Mehmedović A, Agarwal S, Gupta L, Faa G, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Nagy F, Ruzsa Z, Gupta A, Naidu S, Paraskevas KI, Kalra MK. COVLIAS 1.0 vs. MedSeg: Artificial Intelligence-Based Comparative Study for Automated COVID-19 Computed Tomography Lung Segmentation in Italian and Croatian Cohorts. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122367. [PMID: 34943603 PMCID: PMC8699928 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: COVID-19 computed tomography (CT) lung segmentation is critical for COVID lung severity diagnosis. Earlier proposed approaches during 2020–2021 were semiautomated or automated but not accurate, user-friendly, and industry-standard benchmarked. The proposed study compared the COVID Lung Image Analysis System, COVLIAS 1.0 (GBTI, Inc., and AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA, USA, referred to as COVLIAS), against MedSeg, a web-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) segmentation tool, where COVLIAS uses hybrid deep learning (HDL) models for CT lung segmentation. (2) Materials and Methods: The proposed study used 5000 ITALIAN COVID-19 positive CT lung images collected from 72 patients (experimental data) that confirmed the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Two hybrid AI models from the COVLIAS system, namely, VGG-SegNet (HDL 1) and ResNet-SegNet (HDL 2), were used to segment the CT lungs. As part of the results, we compared both COVLIAS and MedSeg against two manual delineations (MD 1 and MD 2) using (i) Bland–Altman plots, (ii) Correlation coefficient (CC) plots, (iii) Receiver operating characteristic curve, and (iv) Figure of Merit and (v) visual overlays. A cohort of 500 CROATIA COVID-19 positive CT lung images (validation data) was used. A previously trained COVLIAS model was directly applied to the validation data (as part of Unseen-AI) to segment the CT lungs and compare them against MedSeg. (3) Result: For the experimental data, the four CCs between COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MD 1, COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MD 2, COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MD 1, and COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MD 2 were 0.96, 0.96, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively. The mean value of the COVLIAS system for the above four readings was 0.96. CC between MedSeg vs. MD 1 and MedSeg vs. MD 2 was 0.98 and 0.98, respectively. Both had a mean value of 0.98. On the validation data, the CC between COVLIAS (HDL 1) vs. MedSeg and COVLIAS (HDL 2) vs. MedSeg was 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. For the experimental data, the difference between the mean values for COVLIAS and MedSeg showed a difference of <2.5%, meeting the standard of equivalence. The average running times for COVLIAS and MedSeg on a single lung CT slice were ~4 s and ~10 s, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The performances of COVLIAS and MedSeg were similar. However, COVLIAS showed improved computing time over MedSeg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (S.A.); (L.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(916)-749-5628
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (S.A.); (L.G.)
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, University of Piemonte Orientale (UPO), 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Alessio Paschè
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Pietro S. C. Danna
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Marta Columbu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (K.V.); (A.M.)
| | - Armin Mehmedović
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (K.V.); (A.M.)
| | - Samriddhi Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (S.A.); (L.G.)
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Lakshya Gupta
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (S.A.); (L.G.)
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, AOU of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 17674 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (A.P.); (P.S.C.D.); (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece;
| | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2408, Cyprus;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA 95611, USA; (S.K.D.); (V.R.)
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Ferenc Nagy
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Archna Gupta
- Radiology Department, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | | | - Mannudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Munjral S, Ahluwalia P, Jamthikar AD, Puvvula A, Saba L, Faa G, Singh IM, Chadha PS, Turk M, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra P, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Kolluri R, Teji J, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Sockalingam M, Saxena A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Viswanathan V, Krishnan PK, Omerzu T, Naidu S, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. Nutrition, atherosclerosis, arterial imaging, cardiovascular risk stratification, and manifestations in COVID-19 framework: a narrative review. FRONT BIOSCI-LANDMRK 2021; 26:1312-1339. [PMID: 34856770 DOI: 10.52586/5026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background: Atherosclerosis is the primary cause of the cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several risk factors lead to atherosclerosis, and altered nutrition is one among those. Nutrition has been ignored quite often in the process of CVD risk assessment. Altered nutrition along with carotid ultrasound imaging-driven atherosclerotic plaque features can help in understanding and banishing the problems associated with the late diagnosis of CVD. Artificial intelligence (AI) is another promisingly adopted technology for CVD risk assessment and management. Therefore, we hypothesize that the risk of atherosclerotic CVD can be accurately monitored using carotid ultrasound imaging, predicted using AI-based algorithms, and reduced with the help of proper nutrition. Layout: The review presents a pathophysiological link between nutrition and atherosclerosis by gaining a deep insight into the processes involved at each stage of plaque development. After targeting the causes and finding out results by low-cost, user-friendly, ultrasound-based arterial imaging, it is important to (i) stratify the risks and (ii) monitor them by measuring plaque burden and computing risk score as part of the preventive framework. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based strategies are used to provide efficient CVD risk assessments. Finally, the review presents the role of AI for CVD risk assessment during COVID-19. Conclusions: By studying the mechanism of low-density lipoprotein formation, saturated and trans fat, and other dietary components that lead to plaque formation, we demonstrate the use of CVD risk assessment due to nutrition and atherosclerosis disease formation during normal and COVID times. Further, nutrition if included, as a part of the associated risk factors can benefit from atherosclerotic disease progression and its management using AI-based CVD risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smiksha Munjral
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA 95678, USA
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Superspeciality Hospital, 110058 New Delhi, India
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA 95678, USA.,Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, 440001 Nagpur, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA 95678, USA.,Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, 24002 Nellore, AP, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 09125 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, AOU of Cagliari, 09125 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA 95678, USA
| | - Paramjit S Chadha
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA 95678, USA
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27749 Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, 110001 New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 106 71 Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - David W Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA
| | | | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 106 71 Athens, Greece
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 546 30 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Prasanna Misra
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, 226018 Lucknow, UP, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, 226018 Lucknow, UP, India
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, DY2 8 Dudley, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, M13 9 Manchester, UK
| | | | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60629, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON M5H, Canada
| | - Surinder K Dhanjil
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA 95678, USA
| | | | - Ajit Saxena
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, 110001 New Delhi, India
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA 95823, USA
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN 55441, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN 55441, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor MVD Research Centre, 600003 Chennai, India
| | - P K Krishnan
- Neurology Department, Fortis Hospital, 562123 Bangalore, India
| | - Tomaz Omerzu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, 999058 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPointTM, Roseville, CA 95678, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Elavarthi P, Pathak R, Ketireddy V, Columbu M, Saba L, Gupta SK, Faa G, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Ferenc N, Ruzsa Z, Gupta A, Naidu S, Kalra MK. Inter-Variability Study of COVLIAS 1.0: Hybrid Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Lung Segmentation in Computed Tomography. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:2025. [PMID: 34829372 PMCID: PMC8625039 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: For COVID-19 lung severity, segmentation of lungs on computed tomography (CT) is the first crucial step. Current deep learning (DL)-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have a bias in the training stage of segmentation because only one set of ground truth (GT) annotations are evaluated. We propose a robust and stable inter-variability analysis of CT lung segmentation in COVID-19 to avoid the effect of bias. Methodology: The proposed inter-variability study consists of two GT tracers for lung segmentation on chest CT. Three AI models, PSP Net, VGG-SegNet, and ResNet-SegNet, were trained using GT annotations. We hypothesized that if AI models are trained on the GT tracings from multiple experience levels, and if the AI performance on the test data between these AI models is within the 5% range, one can consider such an AI model robust and unbiased. The K5 protocol (training to testing: 80%:20%) was adapted. Ten kinds of metrics were used for performance evaluation. Results: The database consisted of 5000 CT chest images from 72 COVID-19-infected patients. By computing the coefficient of correlations (CC) between the output of the two AI models trained corresponding to the two GT tracers, computing their differences in their CC, and repeating the process for all three AI-models, we show the differences as 0%, 0.51%, and 2.04% (all < 5%), thereby validating the hypothesis. The performance was comparable; however, it had the following order: ResNet-SegNet > PSP Net > VGG-SegNet. Conclusions: The AI models were clinically robust and stable during the inter-variability analysis on the CT lung segmentation on COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Pranav Elavarthi
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (S.A.); (P.E.)
- Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Alexandria, VA 22312, USA
| | - Rajesh Pathak
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur 492001, India;
| | | | - Marta Columbu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Suneet K. Gupta
- Department of Computer Science, Bennett University, Noida 201310, India;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 10558 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 10015 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | | | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON L4Z 4C4, Canada;
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2368, Cyprus;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- AtheroPoint LLC, Roseville, CA 95611, USA; (S.K.D.); (V.R.)
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Nagy Ferenc
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Zoltan Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Archna Gupta
- Radiology Department, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA;
| | - Mannudeep K. Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Pathak R, Ketireddy V, Columbu M, Saba L, Gupta SK, Faa G, Singh IM, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Teji JS, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Krishnan PR, Frence N, Ruzsa Z, Gupta A, Naidu S, Kalra M. COVLIAS 1.0: Lung Segmentation in COVID-19 Computed Tomography Scans Using Hybrid Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Models. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1405. [PMID: 34441340 PMCID: PMC8392426 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 lung segmentation using Computed Tomography (CT) scans is important for the diagnosis of lung severity. The process of automated lung segmentation is challenging due to (a) CT radiation dosage and (b) ground-glass opacities caused by COVID-19. The lung segmentation methodologies proposed in 2020 were semi- or automated but not reliable, accurate, and user-friendly. The proposed study presents a COVID Lung Image Analysis System (COVLIAS 1.0, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA) consisting of hybrid deep learning (HDL) models for lung segmentation. METHODOLOGY The COVLIAS 1.0 consists of three methods based on solo deep learning (SDL) or hybrid deep learning (HDL). SegNet is proposed in the SDL category while VGG-SegNet and ResNet-SegNet are designed under the HDL paradigm. The three proposed AI approaches were benchmarked against the National Institute of Health (NIH)-based conventional segmentation model using fuzzy-connectedness. A cross-validation protocol with a 40:60 ratio between training and testing was designed, with 10% validation data. The ground truth (GT) was manually traced by a radiologist trained personnel. For performance evaluation, nine different criteria were selected to perform the evaluation of SDL or HDL lung segmentation regions and lungs long axis against GT. RESULTS Using the database of 5000 chest CT images (from 72 patients), COVLIAS 1.0 yielded AUC of ~0.96, ~0.97, ~0.98, and ~0.96 (p-value < 0.001), respectively within 5% range of GT area, for SegNet, VGG-SegNet, ResNet-SegNet, and NIH. The mean Figure of Merit using four models (left and right lung) was above 94%. On benchmarking against the National Institute of Health (NIH) segmentation method, the proposed model demonstrated a 58% and 44% improvement in ResNet-SegNet, 52% and 36% improvement in VGG-SegNet for lung area, and lung long axis, respectively. The PE statistics performance was in the following order: ResNet-SegNet > VGG-SegNet > NIH > SegNet. The HDL runs in <1 s on test data per image. CONCLUSIONS The COVLIAS 1.0 system can be applied in real-time for radiology-based clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA 95661, USA;
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur 209305, India
| | - Rajesh Pathak
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur 492015, India;
| | | | - Marta Columbu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Suneet K. Gupta
- Department of Computer Science, Bennett University, Noida 201310, India;
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology—AOU of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27753 Delmenhorst, Germany;
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA; (I.M.S.); (P.S.C.)
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 208011, India;
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 176 74 Athens, Greece;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence City, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Martin Miner
- Men’s Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI 02906, USA;
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence City, RI 02912, USA; (G.P.); (D.W.S.)
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09124 Cagliari, Italy; (M.C.); (L.S.); (A.B.)
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece;
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | | | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India; (D.P.M.); (V.A.)
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, UK;
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jagjit S. Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1N8, Canada;
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia 2408, Cyprus;
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA;
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Athero Point LLC, Roseville, CA 95611, USA; (S.K.D.); (V.R.)
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | | | - Nagy Frence
- Department of Internal Medicines, Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (N.F.); (Z.R.)
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Department of Internal Medicines, Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (N.F.); (Z.R.)
| | - Archna Gupta
- Radiology Department, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India;
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55455, USA;
| | - Mannudeep Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Saba L, Sanagala SS, Gupta SK, Koppula VK, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Sharma AM, Viswanathan V, Rathore VS, Turk M, Kolluri R, Viskovic K, Cuadrado-Godia E, Kitas GD, Sharma N, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. Multimodality carotid plaque tissue characterization and classification in the artificial intelligence paradigm: a narrative review for stroke application. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9:1206. [PMID: 34430647 PMCID: PMC8350643 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States of America and globally. Carotid arterial plaque, a cause and also a marker of such CVD, can be detected by various non-invasive imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computer tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US). Characterization and classification of carotid plaque-type in these imaging modalities, especially into symptomatic and asymptomatic plaque, helps in the planning of carotid endarterectomy or stenting. It can be challenging to characterize plaque components due to (I) partial volume effect in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or (II) varying Hausdorff values in plaque regions in CT, and (III) attenuation of echoes reflected by the plaque during US causing acoustic shadowing. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have become an indispensable part of healthcare and their applications to the non-invasive imaging technologies such as MRI, CT, and the US. In this narrative review, three main types of AI models (machine learning, deep learning, and transfer learning) are analyzed when applied to MRI, CT, and the US. A link between carotid plaque characteristics and the risk of coronary artery disease is presented. With regard to characterization, we review tools and techniques that use AI models to distinguish carotid plaque types based on signal processing and feature strengths. We conclude that AI-based solutions offer an accurate and robust path for tissue characterization and classification for carotid artery plaque imaging in all three imaging modalities. Due to cost, user-friendliness, and clinical effectiveness, AI in the US has dominated the most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Skandha S Sanagala
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India.,CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Vijaya K Koppula
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Durga P Misra
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes & Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Vijay S Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | | | | | | | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, IIT-BHU, Banaras, UP, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Biswas M, Saba L, Omerzu T, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Kolluri R, Sharma A, Viswanathan V, Ruzsa Z, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. A Review on Joint Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Plaque Area Measurement in Ultrasound for Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Monitoring: Artificial Intelligence Framework. J Digit Imaging 2021; 34:581-604. [PMID: 34080104 PMCID: PMC8329154 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00461-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the top ten leading causes of death worldwide. Atherosclerosis disease in the arteries is the main cause of the CVD, leading to myocardial infarction and stroke. The two primary image-based phenotypes used for monitoring the atherosclerosis burden is carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and plaque area (PA). Earlier segmentation and measurement methods were based on ad hoc conventional and semi-automated digital imaging solutions, which are unreliable, tedious, slow, and not robust. This study reviews the modern and automated methods such as artificial intelligence (AI)-based. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) can provide automated techniques in the detection and measurement of cIMT and PA from carotid vascular images. Both ML and DL techniques are examples of supervised learning, i.e., learn from "ground truth" images and transformation of test images that are not part of the training. This review summarizes (1) the evolution and impact of the fast-changing AI technology on cIMT/PA measurement, (2) the mathematical representations of ML/DL methods, and (3) segmentation approaches for cIMT/PA regions in carotid scans based for (a) region-of-interest detection and (b) lumen-intima and media-adventitia interface detection using ML/DL frameworks. AI-based methods for cIMT/PA segmentation have emerged for CVD/stroke risk monitoring and may expand to the recommended parameters for atherosclerosis assessment by carotid ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Tomaž Omerzu
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Vikas Agarwal
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Invasive Cardiology Division, University of Szeged, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Suri JS, Agarwal S, Gupta SK, Puvvula A, Biswas M, Saba L, Bit A, Tandel GS, Agarwal M, Patrick A, Faa G, Singh IM, Oberleitner R, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Miguel Sanches J, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Ahluwalia P, Teji J, Al-Maini M, Dhanjil SK, Sockalingam M, Saxena A, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Ajuluchukwu JNA, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Viswanathan V, Krishnan PK, Naidu S. A narrative review on characterization of acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19-infected lungs using artificial intelligence. Comput Biol Med 2021; 130:104210. [PMID: 33550068 PMCID: PMC7813499 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 has infected 77.4 million people worldwide and has caused 1.7 million fatalities as of December 21, 2020. The primary cause of death due to COVID-19 is Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), people who are at least 60 years old or have comorbidities that have primarily been targeted are at the highest risk from SARS-CoV-2. Medical imaging provides a non-invasive, touch-free, and relatively safer alternative tool for diagnosis during the current ongoing pandemic. Artificial intelligence (AI) scientists are developing several intelligent computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tools in multiple imaging modalities, i.e., lung computed tomography (CT), chest X-rays, and lung ultrasounds. These AI tools assist the pulmonary and critical care clinicians through (a) faster detection of the presence of a virus, (b) classifying pneumonia types, and (c) measuring the severity of viral damage in COVID-19-infected patients. Thus, it is of the utmost importance to fully understand the requirements of for a fast and successful, and timely lung scans analysis. This narrative review first presents the pathological layout of the lungs in the COVID-19 scenario, followed by understanding and then explains the comorbid statistical distributions in the ARDS framework. The novelty of this review is the approach to classifying the AI models as per the by school of thought (SoTs), exhibiting based on segregation of techniques and their characteristics. The study also discusses the identification of AI models and its extension from non-ARDS lungs (pre-COVID-19) to ARDS lungs (post-COVID-19). Furthermore, it also presents AI workflow considerations of for medical imaging modalities in the COVID-19 framework. Finally, clinical AI design considerations will be discussed. We conclude that the design of the current existing AI models can be improved by considering comorbidity as an independent factor. Furthermore, ARDS post-processing clinical systems must involve include (i) the clinical validation and verification of AI-models, (ii) reliability and stability criteria, and (iii) easily adaptable, and (iv) generalization assessments of AI systems for their use in pulmonary, critical care, and radiological settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| | - Sushant Agarwal
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, GBTI, Roseville, CA, USA; Department of Computer Science Engineering, PSIT, Kanpur, India
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA; Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, AP, India
| | - Mainak Biswas
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, JIS University, Kolkata, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Arindam Bit
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, NIT, Raipur, India
| | - Gopal S Tandel
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, VNIT, Nagpur, India
| | - Mohit Agarwal
- Department of Computer Science Engineering, Bennett University, India
| | | | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology - AOU of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | | | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Paramjit S Chadha
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Miguel Sanches
- Institute of Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - David W Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Vikas Agarwal
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK; Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Ajit Saxena
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Stroke Diagnostic and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | | | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Dept. of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - P K Krishnan
- Neurology Department, Fortis Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Agarwal M, Saba L, Gupta SK, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Sharma AM, Viswanathan V, Kitas GD, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. Wilson disease tissue classification and characterization using seven artificial intelligence models embedded with 3D optimization paradigm on a weak training brain magnetic resonance imaging datasets: a supercomputer application. Med Biol Eng Comput 2021; 59:511-533. [PMID: 33547549 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02322-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Wilson's disease (WD) is caused by copper accumulation in the brain and liver, and if not treated early, can lead to severe disability and death. WD has shown white matter hyperintensity (WMH) in the brain magnetic resonance scans (MRI) scans, but the diagnosis is challenging due to (i) subtle intensity changes and (ii) weak training MRI when using artificial intelligence (AI). Design and validate seven types of high-performing AI-based computer-aided design (CADx) systems consisting of 3D optimized classification, and characterization of WD against controls. We propose a "conventional deep convolution neural network" (cDCNN) and an "improved DCNN" (iDCNN) where rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation function was modified ensuring "differentiable at zero." Three-dimensional optimization was achieved by recording accuracy while changing the CNN layers and augmentation by several folds. WD was characterized using (i) CNN-based feature map strength and (ii) Bispectrum strengths of pixels having higher probabilities of WD. We further computed the (a) area under the curve (AUC), (b) diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), (c) reliability, and (d) stability and (e) benchmarking. Optimal results were achieved using 9 layers of CNN, with 4-fold augmentation. iDCNN yields superior performance compared to cDCNN with accuracy and AUC of 98.28 ± 1.55, 0.99 (p < 0.0001), and 97.19 ± 2.53%, 0.984 (p < 0.0001), respectively. DOR of iDCNN outperformed cDCNN fourfold. iDCNN also outperformed (a) transfer learning-based "Inception V3" paradigm by 11.92% and (b) four types of "conventional machine learning-based systems": k-NN, decision tree, support vector machine, and random forest by 55.13%, 28.36%, 15.35%, and 14.11%, respectively. The AI-based systems can potentially be useful in the early WD diagnosis. Graphical Abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit Agarwal
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Ontario, Kingston, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes & Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Saba L, Agarwal M, Patrick A, Puvvula A, Gupta SK, Carriero A, Laird JR, Kitas GD, Johri AM, Balestrieri A, Falaschi Z, Paschè A, Viswanathan V, El-Baz A, Alam I, Jain A, Naidu S, Oberleitner R, Khanna NN, Bit A, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Suri JS. Six artificial intelligence paradigms for tissue characterisation and classification of non-COVID-19 pneumonia against COVID-19 pneumonia in computed tomography lungs. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021; 16:423-434. [PMID: 33532975 PMCID: PMC7854027 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02317-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background COVID-19 pandemic has currently no vaccines. Thus, the only feasible solution for prevention relies on the detection of COVID-19-positive cases through quick and accurate testing. Since artificial intelligence (AI) offers the powerful mechanism to automatically extract the tissue features and characterise the disease, we therefore hypothesise that AI-based strategies can provide quick detection and classification, especially for radiological computed tomography (CT) lung scans. Methodology Six models, two traditional machine learning (ML)-based (k-NN and RF), two transfer learning (TL)-based (VGG19 and InceptionV3), and the last two were our custom-designed deep learning (DL) models (CNN and iCNN), were developed for classification between COVID pneumonia (CoP) and non-COVID pneumonia (NCoP). K10 cross-validation (90% training: 10% testing) protocol on an Italian cohort of 100 CoP and 30 NCoP patients was used for performance evaluation and bispectrum analysis for CT lung characterisation. Results Using K10 protocol, our results showed the accuracy in the order of DL > TL > ML, ranging the six accuracies for k-NN, RF, VGG19, IV3, CNN, iCNN as 74.58 ± 2.44%, 96.84 ± 2.6, 94.84 ± 2.85%, 99.53 ± 0.75%, 99.53 ± 1.05%, and 99.69 ± 0.66%, respectively. The corresponding AUCs were 0.74, 0.94, 0.96, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99 (p-values < 0.0001), respectively. Our Bispectrum-based characterisation system suggested CoP can be separated against NCoP using AI models. COVID risk severity stratification also showed a high correlation of 0.7270 (p < 0.0001) with clinical scores such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), further validating our AI models. Conclusions We prove our hypothesis by demonstrating that all the six AI models successfully classified CoP against NCoP due to the strong presence of contrasting features such as ground-glass opacities (GGO), consolidations, and pleural effusion in CoP patients. Further, our online system takes < 2 s for inference. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-021-02317-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Cagliari, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy
| | - Mohit Agarwal
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Anubhav Patrick
- CSE Department, KIET Group of Institutions, Delhi, NCR, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, AP, India
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U. Maggiore D.C. University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U. Maggiore D.C. University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Zeno Falaschi
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U. Maggiore D.C. University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessio Paschè
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U. Maggiore D.C. University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Ayman El-Baz
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Iqbal Alam
- Department of Physiology, HIMSR, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
| | - Abhinav Jain
- Department of Radiology, HIMSR, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| | | | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Arindam Bit
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Raipur, India
| | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc., Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Suri JS, Puvvula A, Majhail M, Biswas M, Jamthikar AD, Saba L, Faa G, Singh IM, Oberleitner R, Turk M, Srivastava S, Chadha PS, Suri HS, Johri AM, Nambi V, Sanches JM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Bit A, Pareek G, Miner M, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Kolluri R, Teji J, Porcu M, Al-Maini M, Agbakoba A, Sockalingam M, Sexena A, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Viswanathan V, Naidu S, Bhatt DL. Integration of cardiovascular risk assessment with COVID-19 using artificial intelligence. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2021; 21:541-560. [PMID: 33387999 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI), in general, refers to the machines (or computers) that mimic "cognitive" functions that we associate with our mind, such as "learning" and "solving problem". New biomarkers derived from medical imaging are being discovered and are then fused with non-imaging biomarkers (such as office, laboratory, physiological, genetic, epidemiological, and clinical-based biomarkers) in a big data framework, to develop AI systems. These systems can support risk prediction and monitoring. This perspective narrative shows the powerful methods of AI for tracking cardiovascular risks. We conclude that AI could potentially become an integral part of the COVID-19 disease management system. Countries, large and small, should join hands with the WHO in building biobanks for scientists around the world to build AI-based platforms for tracking the cardiovascular risk assessment during COVID-19 times and long-term follow-up of the survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, 95747, CA, USA
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, 95747, CA, USA.,Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, 524001, AP, India
| | - Misha Majhail
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, 95747, CA, USA.,Oakmount High School and AtheroPoint™, Roseville, 95747, CA, USA
| | | | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of ECE, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, 440010, MH, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, 09100, AOU of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Inder M Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, 95747, CA, USA
| | | | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, 27749, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Saurabh Srivastava
- School of Computing Science & Engineering, Galgotias University, 201301, Gr. Noida, India
| | - Paramjit S Chadha
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, 95747, CA, USA
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, B0P 1R0, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vijay Nambi
- Department of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, 77001, TX, USA
| | - J Miguel Sanches
- Institute of Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Tecnico, 1000-001, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, 110001, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, 104 31, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, 94574, CA, USA
| | - Arindam Bit
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, NIT, Raipur, 783334, CG, India
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, 02901, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, 02901, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Antonella Balestrieri
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 104 31, Greece
| | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, 544 53, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Durga Prasanna Misra
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226001, UP, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226001, UP, India
| | - George D Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, DY1, Dudley, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, M13, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 60601, Chicago, USA
| | - Michele Porcu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mustafa Al-Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, M3H 6A7, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Ajit Sexena
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, 110001, New Delhi, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, 999058, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22901, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, 94203, CA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, 600001, Chennai, India
| | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, 55801, MN, USA
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02108, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Laird JR, Mathews SJ, Brodmann M, Soukas PA, Schmidt A. Performance of the Wingman catheter in peripheral artery chronic total occlusions: Short-term results from the international Wing-It trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 97:310-316. [PMID: 33211386 PMCID: PMC7984280 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the safety and effectiveness of a peripheral artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) crossing catheter following failed crossing attempts with standard guidewires. BACKGROUND CTO crossing remains a challenge during peripheral artery interventions. METHODS In this prospective, international, single-arm study, patients with a peripheral artery CTO that was uncrossable with standard guidewires were treated with a crossing catheter (Wingman, Reflow Medical). The primary efficacy endpoint of CTO crossing success was compared to a performance goal of 70.7%. The primary composite safety endpoint (major adverse event [MAE], clinically significant perforation or embolization, or grade C or greater dissection) was assessed over a 30-day follow-up period and compared to a performance goal of 13.0%. RESULTS A total of 85 patients were treated using the Wingman catheter for peripheral artery CTO crossing. Key patient characteristics were mean age of 71±9 years, 66% male, and mean lesion length of 188±94 mm in the superficial femoral artery (71%), popliteal artery (15%), or infrapopliteal arteries (14%). Both primary endpoints of the trial were met¾CTO crossing success was 90% (lower confidence limit=82.5%) and 5 primary safety events occurred in 4 (4.8%) patients (upper confidence limit=10.7%). Over 30 days of follow-up, Rutherford score decreased by at least 2 categories in 74% patients; the percentage of patients with normal hemodynamics assessed with the ankle-brachial index increased from 1% to 51%. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a CTO that was unable to be crossed with a standard guidewire, the Wingman catheter was able to cross 90% of occlusions with a favorable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Laird
- Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist St. Helena Hospital, St. Helena, California
| | | | | | - Peter A Soukas
- Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Andrej Schmidt
- Division of Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology and Dermatology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Saba L, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Sattar N, Johri AM, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Viswanathan V, Sharma A, Kitas GD, Nicolaides A, Kolluri R, Suri JS. Artificial intelligence framework for predictive cardiovascular and stroke risk assessment models: A narrative review of integrated approaches using carotid ultrasound. Comput Biol Med 2020; 126:104043. [PMID: 33065389 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
RECENT FINDINGS Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality and poses challenges for healthcare providers globally. Risk-based approaches for the management of CVD are becoming popular for recommending treatment plans for asymptomatic individuals. Several conventional predictive CVD risk models based do not provide an accurate CVD risk assessment for patients with different baseline risk profiles. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have changed the landscape of CVD risk assessment and demonstrated a better performance when compared against conventional models, mainly due to its ability to handle the input nonlinear variations. Further, it has the flexibility to add risk factors derived from medical imaging modalities that image the morphology of the plaque. The integration of noninvasive carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes with conventional risk factors in the AI framework has further provided stronger power for CVD risk prediction, so-called "integrated predictive CVD risk models." PURPOSE of the review: The objective of this review is (i) to understand several aspects in the development of predictive CVD risk models, (ii) to explore current conventional predictive risk models and their successes and challenges, and (iii) to refine the search for predictive CVD risk models using noninvasive carotid ultrasound as an exemplar in the artificial intelligence-based framework. CONCLUSION Conventional predictive CVD risk models are suboptimal and could be improved. This review examines the potential to include more noninvasive image-based phenotypes in the CVD risk assessment using powerful AI-based strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Croatia
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Naveed Sattar
- Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens, Greece
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Suri JS, Puvvula A, Biswas M, Majhail M, Saba L, Faa G, Singh IM, Oberleitner R, Turk M, Chadha PS, Johri AM, Sanches JM, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sobel DW, Balestrieri A, Sfikakis PP, Tsoulfas G, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Ahluwalia P, Kolluri R, Teji J, Maini MA, Agbakoba A, Dhanjil SK, Sockalingam M, Saxena A, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Rathore V, Ajuluchukwu JN, Fatemi M, Alizad A, Viswanathan V, Krishnan PR, Naidu S. COVID-19 pathways for brain and heart injury in comorbidity patients: A role of medical imaging and artificial intelligence-based COVID severity classification: A review. Comput Biol Med 2020; 124:103960. [PMID: 32919186 PMCID: PMC7426723 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has penetrated the field of medicine, particularly the field of radiology. Since its emergence, the highly virulent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected over 10 million people, leading to over 500,000 deaths as of July 1st, 2020. Since the outbreak began, almost 28,000 articles about COVID-19 have been published (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov); however, few have explored the role of imaging and artificial intelligence in COVID-19 patients-specifically, those with comorbidities. This paper begins by presenting the four pathways that can lead to heart and brain injuries following a COVID-19 infection. Our survey also offers insights into the role that imaging can play in the treatment of comorbid patients, based on probabilities derived from COVID-19 symptom statistics. Such symptoms include myocardial injury, hypoxia, plaque rupture, arrhythmias, venous thromboembolism, coronary thrombosis, encephalitis, ischemia, inflammation, and lung injury. At its core, this study considers the role of image-based AI, which can be used to characterize the tissues of a COVID-19 patient and classify the severity of their infection. Image-based AI is more important than ever as the pandemic surges and countries worldwide grapple with limited medical resources for detection and diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA,Corresponding author. American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering Fellow, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Fellow, Asia Pacific Vascular Society Stroke Monitoring and Diagnosis Division AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA,Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, AP, India
| | | | - Misha Majhail
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA,Oakmont High School and AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology - AOU of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Inder M. Singh
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | | | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | - Paramjit S. Chadha
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| | - Amer M. Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology,Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - J. Miguel Sanches
- Institute of Systems and Robotics, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - David W. Sobel
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | | - George Tsoulfas
- Aristoteleion University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Vikas Agarwal
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - George D. Kitas
- Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK,Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Puneet Ahluwalia
- Max Institute of Cancer Care, Max Superspeciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Jagjit Teji
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Mustafa Al Maini
- Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ajit Saxena
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Mostafa Fatemi
- Dept. of Physiology & Biomedical Engg., Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | - Azra Alizad
- Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, MN, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | | | - Subbaram Naidu
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Puvvula A, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Saba L, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Kolluri R, Sharma AM, Viswanathan V, Rathore VS, Suri JS. Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using carotid ultrasound B-mode imaging. Rheumatol Int 2020; 40:1921-1939. [PMID: 32857281 PMCID: PMC7453675 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04691-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic chronic inflammatory disease that affects synovial joints and has various extra-articular manifestations, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with RA experience a higher risk of CVD, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Inflammation is a common phenomenon in RA and CVD. The pathophysiological association between these diseases is still not clear, and, thus, the risk assessment and detection of CVD in such patients is of clinical importance. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has gained prominence in advancing healthcare and, therefore, may further help to investigate the RA-CVD association. There are three aims of this review: (1) to summarize the three pathophysiological pathways that link RA to CVD; (2) to identify several traditional and carotid ultrasound image-based CVD risk calculators useful for RA patients, and (3) to understand the role of artificial intelligence in CVD risk assessment in RA patients. Our search strategy involves extensively searches in PubMed and Web of Science databases using search terms associated with CVD risk assessment in RA patients. A total of 120 peer-reviewed articles were screened for this review. We conclude that (a) two of the three pathways directly affect the atherosclerotic process, leading to heart injury, (b) carotid ultrasound image-based calculators have shown superior performance compared with conventional calculators, and (c) AI-based technologies in CVD risk assessment in RA patients are aggressively being adapted for routine practice of RA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, MH, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, MH, India
| | | | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- Department of Rheumatology, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | | | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Vijay S Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, 95661, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Skandha SS, Gupta SK, Saba L, Koppula VK, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Sharma AM, Viswanathan V, Rathore VS, Turk M, Kolluri R, Viskovic K, Cuadrado-Godia E, Kitas GD, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. 3-D optimized classification and characterization artificial intelligence paradigm for cardiovascular/stroke risk stratification using carotid ultrasound-based delineated plaque: Atheromatic™ 2.0. Comput Biol Med 2020; 125:103958. [PMID: 32927257 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Atherosclerotic plaque tissue rupture is one of the leading causes of strokes. Early carotid plaque monitoring can help reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Manual ultrasound plaque classification and characterization methods are time-consuming and can be imprecise due to significant variations in tissue characteristics. We report a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based plaque tissue classification and characterization system. METHODS We hypothesize that symptomatic plaque is hypoechoic due to its large lipid core and minimal collagen, as well as its heterogeneous makeup. Meanwhile, asymptomatic plaque is hyperechoic due to its small lipid core, abundant collagen, and the fact that it is often calcified. We designed a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system consisting of three kinds of deep learning (DL) classification paradigms: Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN), Visual Geometric Group-16 (VGG16), and transfer learning, (tCNN). DCNN was 3-D optimized by varying the number of CNN layers and data augmentation frameworks. The DL systems were benchmarked against four types of machine learning (ML) classification systems, and the CADx system was characterized using two novel strategies consisting of DL mean feature strength (MFS) and a bispectrum model using higher-order spectra. RESULTS After balancing symptomatic and asymptomatic plaque classes, a five-fold augmentation process was applied, yielding 1000 carotid scans in each class. Then, using a K10 protocol (trained to test the ratio of 90%-10%), tCNN and DCNN yielded accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)) pairs of 83.33%, 0.833 (p < 0.0001) and 95.66%, 0.956 (p < 0.0001), respectively. DCNN was superior to ML by 7.01%. As part of the characterization process, the MFS of the symptomatic plaque was found to be higher compared to the asymptomatic plaque by 17.5% (p < 0.0001). A similar pattern was seen in the bispectrum, which was higher for symptomatic plaque by 5.4% (p < 0.0001). It took <2 s to perform the online CADx process on a supercomputer. CONCLUSIONS The performance order of the three AI systems was DCNN > tCNN > ML. Bispectrum-based on higher-order spectra proved a powerful paradigm for plaque tissue characterization. Overall, the AI-based systems offer a powerful solution for plaque tissue classification and characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanagala S Skandha
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India; CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Vijaya K Koppula
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, RI, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens, Greece
| | - Durga P Misra
- Dept. of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Dept. of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes & Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Vijay S Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | | | | | | | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Saba L, Khanna NN, Araki T, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Viswanathan V, Sharma A, Nicolaides A, Kitas GD, Suri JS. Cardiovascular/stroke risk predictive calculators: a comparison between statistical and machine learning models. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020; 10:919-938. [PMID: 32968651 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2020.01.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Statistically derived cardiovascular risk calculators (CVRC) that use conventional risk factors, generally underestimate or overestimate the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or stroke events primarily due to lack of integration of plaque burden. This study investigates the role of machine learning (ML)-based CVD/stroke risk calculators (CVRCML) and compares against statistically derived CVRC (CVRCStat) based on (I) conventional factors or (II) combined conventional with plaque burden (integrated factors). Methods The proposed study is divided into 3 parts: (I) statistical calculator: initially, the 10-year CVD/stroke risk was computed using 13 types of CVRCStat (without and with plaque burden) and binary risk stratification of the patients was performed using the predefined thresholds and risk classes; (II) ML calculator: using the same risk factors (without and with plaque burden), as adopted in 13 different CVRCStat, the patients were again risk-stratified using CVRCML based on support vector machine (SVM) and finally; (III) both types of calculators were evaluated using AUC based on ROC analysis, which was computed using combination of predicted class and endpoint equivalent to CVD/stroke events. Results An Institutional Review Board approved 202 patients (156 males and 46 females) of Japanese ethnicity were recruited for this study with a mean age of 69±11 years. The AUC for 13 different types of CVRCStat calculators were: AECRS2.0 (AUC 0.83, P<0.001), QRISK3 (AUC 0.72, P<0.001), WHO (AUC 0.70, P<0.001), ASCVD (AUC 0.67, P<0.001), FRScardio (AUC 0.67, P<0.01), FRSstroke (AUC 0.64, P<0.001), MSRC (AUC 0.63, P=0.03), UKPDS56 (AUC 0.63, P<0.001), NIPPON (AUC 0.63, P<0.001), PROCAM (AUC 0.59, P<0.001), RRS (AUC 0.57, P<0.001), UKPDS60 (AUC 0.53, P<0.001), and SCORE (AUC 0.45, P<0.001), while the AUC for the CVRCML with integrated risk factors (AUC 0.88, P<0.001), a 42% increase in performance. The overall risk-stratification accuracy for the CVRCML with integrated risk factors was 92.52% which was higher compared all the other CVRCStat. Conclusions ML-based CVD/stroke risk calculator provided a higher predictive ability of 10-year CVD/stroke compared to the 13 different types of statistically derived risk calculators including integrated model AECRS 2.0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Tadashi Araki
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Cuadrado-Godia E, Puvvula A, Khanna NN, Saba L, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Shankar C, Nicolaides A, Viswanathan V, Sharma A, Suri JS. Ultrasound-based stroke/cardiovascular risk stratification using Framingham Risk Score and ASCVD Risk Score based on "Integrated Vascular Age" instead of "Chronological Age": a multi-ethnic study of Asian Indian, Caucasian, and Japanese cohorts. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2020; 10:939-954. [PMID: 32968652 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2020.01.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Vascular age (VA) has recently emerged for CVD risk assessment and can either be computed using conventional risk factors (CRF) or by using carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) derived from carotid ultrasound (CUS). This study investigates a novel method of integrating both CRF and cIMT for estimating VA [so-called integrated VA (IVA)]. Further, the study analyzes and compares CVD/stroke risk using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS)-based risk calculator when adapting IVA against VA. Methods The system follows a four-step process: (I) VA using cIMT based using linear-regression (LR) model and its coefficients; (II) VA prediction using ten CRF using a multivariate linear regression (MLR)-based model with gender adjustment; (III) coefficients from the LR-based model and MLR-based model are combined using a linear model to predict the final IVA; (IV) the final step consists of FRS-based risk stratification with IVA as inputs and benchmarked against FRS using conventional method of CA. Area-under-the-curve (AUC) is computed using IVA and benchmarked against CA while taking the response variable as a standardized combination of cIMT and glycated hemoglobin. Results The study recruited 648 patients, 202 were Japanese, 314 were Asian Indian, and 132 were Caucasians. Both left and right common carotid arteries (CCA) of all the population were scanned, thus a total of 1,287 ultrasound scans. The 10-year FRS using IVA reported higher AUC (AUC =0.78) compared with 10-year FRS using CA (AUC =0.66) by ~18%. Conclusions IVA is an efficient biomarker for risk stratifications for patients in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, Andra Pradesh, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Viswanathan V, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Puvvula A, Khanna NN, Saba L, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Sharma A, Kancharana P, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Kitas GD, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. Does the Carotid Bulb Offer a Better 10-Year CVD/Stroke Risk Assessment Compared to the Common Carotid Artery? A 1516 Ultrasound Scan Study. Angiology 2020; 71:920-933. [PMID: 32696658 DOI: 10.1177/0003319720941730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to (1) examine the "10-year cardiovascular risk" in the common carotid artery (CCA) versus carotid bulb using an integrated calculator called "AtheroEdge Composite Risk Score 2.0" (AECRS2.0) and (2) evaluate the performance of AECRS2.0 against "conventional cardiovascular risk calculators." These objectives are met by measuring (1) image-based phenotypes and AECRS2.0 score computation and (2) performance evaluation of AECRS2.0 against 12 conventional cardiovascular risk calculators. The Asian-Indian cohort (n = 379) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or hypertension were retrospectively analyzed by acquiring the 1516 carotid ultrasound scans (mean age: 55 ± 10.1 years, 67% males, ∼92% with T2DM, ∼83% with CKD [stage 1-5], and 87.5% with hypertension [stage 1-2]). The carotid bulb showed a higher 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to the CCA by 18% (P < .0001). Patients with T2DM and/or CKD also followed a similar trend. The carotid bulb demonstrated a superior risk assessment compared to CCA in patients with T2DM and/or CKD by showing: (1) ∼13% better than CCA (0.93 vs 0.82, P = .0001) and (2) ∼29% better compared with 12 types of risk conventional calculators (0.93 vs 0.72, P = .06).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Viswanathan
- 58896Moopil Viswanathan Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 29583Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 29583Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, 75911Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, 6752Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, 68993National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, 68993National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Priyanka Kancharana
- 58896Moopil Viswanathan Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Vikas Agarwal
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, 7714Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Saba L, Laird JR, Suri JS. Cardiovascular/stroke risk prevention: A new machine learning framework integrating carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes and its harmonics with conventional risk factors. Indian Heart J 2020; 72:258-264. [PMID: 32861380 PMCID: PMC7474133 DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Machine learning (ML)-based stroke risk stratification systems have typically focused on conventional risk factors (CRF) (AtheroRisk-conventional). Besides CRF, carotid ultrasound image phenotypes (CUSIP) have shown to be powerful phenotypes risk stratification. This is the first ML study of its kind that integrates CUSIP and CRF for risk stratification (AtheroRisk-integrated) and compares against AtheroRisk-conventional. METHODS Two types of ML-based setups called (i) AtheroRisk-integrated and (ii) AtheroRisk-conventional were developed using random forest (RF) classifiers. AtheroRisk-conventional uses a feature set of 13 CRF such as age, gender, hemoglobin A1c, fasting blood sugar, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol (TC), a ratio of TC and HDL, hypertension, smoking, family history, triglyceride, and ultrasound-based carotid plaque score. AtheroRisk-integrated system uses the feature set of 38 features with a combination of 13 CRF and 25 CUSIP features (6 types of current CUSIP, 6 types of 10-year CUSIP, 12 types of quadratic CUSIP (harmonics), and age-adjusted grayscale median). Logistic regression approach was used to select the significant features on which the RF classifier was trained. The performance of both ML systems was evaluated by area-under-the-curve (AUC) statistics computed using a leave-one-out cross-validation protocol. RESULTS Left and right common carotid arteries of 202 Japanese patients were retrospectively examined to obtain 404 ultrasound scans. RF classifier showed higher improvement in AUC (~57%) for leave-one-out cross-validation protocol. Using RF classifier, AUC statistics for AtheroRisk-integrated system was higher (AUC = 0.99,p-value<0.001) compared to AtheroRisk-conventional (AUC = 0.63,p-value<0.001). CONCLUSION The AtheroRisk-integrated ML system outperforms the AtheroRisk-conventional ML system using RF classifier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Biswas M, Saba L, Chakrabartty S, Khanna NN, Song H, Suri HS, Sfikakis PP, Mavrogeni S, Viskovic K, Laird JR, Cuadrado-Godia E, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Viswanathan V, Protogerou A, Kitas G, Pareek G, Miner M, Suri JS. Two-stage artificial intelligence model for jointly measurement of atherosclerotic wall thickness and plaque burden in carotid ultrasound: A screening tool for cardiovascular/stroke risk assessment. Comput Biol Med 2020; 123:103847. [PMID: 32768040 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
MOTIVATION The early screening of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) can lead to effective treatment. Thus, accurate and reliable atherosclerotic carotid wall detection and plaque measurements are crucial. Current measurement methods are time-consuming and do not utilize the power of knowledge-based paradigms such as artificial intelligence (AI). We present an AI-based methodology for the joint automated detection and measurement of wall thickness and carotid plaque (CP) in the form of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and total plaque area (TPA), a class of AtheroEdge™ system (AtheroPoint™, CA, USA). METHOD The novel system consists of two stages, and each stage comprises an independent deep learning (DL) model. In Stage I, the first DL model segregates the common carotid artery (CCA) patches from ultrasound (US) images into the rectangular wall and non-wall patches. The characterized wall patches are integrated to form the region of interest (ROI), which is then fed into Stage II. In Stage II, the second DL model segments the far wall region. Lumen-intima (LI) and media-adventitial (MA) boundaries are then extracted from the wall region, which is then used for cIMT and PA measurement. RESULTS Using the database of 250 carotid scans, the cIMT error using the AI model is 0.0935±0.0637 mm, which is lower than those of all previous methods. The PA error is found to be 2.7939±2.3702 mm2. The system's correlation coefficient (CC) between AI and ground truth (GT) values for cIMT is 0.99 (p < 0.0001), which is higher compared with the CC of 0.96 (p < 0.0001) shown by the earlier DL method. The CC for PA between AI and GT values is 0.89 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION A novel AI-based strategy was applied to carotid US images for the joint detection of carotid wall thickness (cWT) and plaque area (PA), followed by cIMT and PA measurement. This AI-based strategy shows improved performance using the patch technique compared with previous methods using full carotid scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U., Italy
| | | | - Narender N Khanna
- Cardiology Department, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | | | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, London, UK; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | | | - George Kitas
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Manchester, Dudley, UK
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Viswanathan V, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Puvvula A, Khanna NN, Saba L, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Ajuluchukwu J, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Suri JS. Integration of estimated glomerular filtration rate biomarker in image-based cardiovascular disease/stroke risk calculator: a south Asian-Indian diabetes cohort with moderate chronic kidney disease. INT ANGIOL 2020; 39:290-306. [PMID: 32214072 DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.20.04338-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, a 10-year image-based integrated calculator (called AtheroEdge Composite Risk Score-AECRS1.0) was developed which combines conventional cardiovascular risk factors (CCVRF) with image phenotypes derived from carotid ultrasound (CUS). Such calculators did not include chronic kidney disease (CKD)-based biomarker called estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The novelty of this study is to design and develop an advanced integrated version called-AECRS2.0 that combines eGFR with image phenotypes to compute the composite risk score. Furthermore, AECRS2.0 was benchmarked against QRISK3 which considers eGFR for risk assessment. METHODS The method consists of three major steps: 1) five, current CUS image phenotypes (CUSIP) measurements using AtheroEdge system (AtheroPoint, CA, USA) consisting of: average carotid intima-media thickness (cIMTave), maximum cIMT (cIMTmax), minimum cIMT (cIMTmin), variability in cIMT (cIMTV), and total plaque area (TPA); 2) five, 10-year CUSIP measurements by combining these current five CUSIP with 11 CCVRF (age, ethnicity, gender, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, smoking, carotid artery type, hemoglobin, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and eGFR); 3) AECRS2.0 risk score computation and its comparison to QRISK3 using area-under-the-curve (AUC). RESULTS South Asian-Indian 339 patients were retrospectively analyzed by acquiring their left/right common carotid arteries (678 CUS, mean age: 54.25±9.84 years; 75.22% males; 93.51% diabetic with HbA1c ≥6.5%; and mean eGFR 73.84±20.91 mL/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>). The proposed AECRS2.0 reported higher AUC (AUC=0.89, P<0.001) compared to QRISK3 (AUC=0.51, P<0.001) by ~74% in CKD patients. CONCLUSIONS An integrated calculator AECRS2.0 can be used to assess the 10-year CVD/stroke risk in patients suffering from CKD. AECRS2.0 was much superior to QRISK3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communications, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communications, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
| | | | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jna Ajuluchukwu
- Department of Medicine, LUTH (Lagos University Teaching Hospital), Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Unit of Rheumatology, National Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention and, Research Unit Clinic, Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Center, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Division of Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostics, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Puvvula A, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Porcu M, Saba L, Viskovic K, Ajuluchukwu JNA, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Nicolaides A, Viswanathan V, Suri JS. Morphological Carotid Plaque Area Is Associated With Glomerular Filtration Rate: A Study of South Asian Indian Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. Angiology 2020; 71:520-535. [PMID: 32180436 DOI: 10.1177/0003319720910660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated the association between automatically measured carotid total plaque area (TPA) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a biomarker of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Automated average carotid intima-media thickness (cIMTave) and TPA measurements in carotid ultrasound (CUS) were performed using AtheroEdge (AtheroPoint). Pearson correlation coefficient (CC) was then computed between the TPA and eGFR for (1) males versus females, (2) diabetic versus nondiabetic patients, and (3) between the left and right carotid artery. Overall, 339 South Asian Indian patients with either type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or CKD, or hypertension (stage 1 or stage 2) were retrospectively analyzed by acquiring cIMTave and TPA measurements of their left and right common carotid arteries (CCA; total CUS: 678, mean age: 54.2 ± 9.8 years; 75.2% males; 93.5% with T2DM). The CC between TPA and eGFR for different scenarios were (1) for males and females -0.25 (P < .001) and -0.35 (P < .001), respectively; (2) for T2DM and non-T2DM -0.26 (P < .001) and -0.49 (P = .02), respectively, and (3) for left and right CCA -0.25 (P < .001) and -0.23 (P < .001), respectively. Automated TPA is an equally reliable biomarker compared with cIMTave for patients with CKD (with or without T2DM) with subclinical atherosclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anudeep Puvvula
- Annu's Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Michele Porcu
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Slovenia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit Clinic and Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- M. V. Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Viswanathan V, Jamthikar AD, Gupta D, Shanu N, Puvvula A, Khanna NN, Saba L, Omerzum T, Viskovic K, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, S C, Joshi S, Fiscian H, Folson AA, Wu DH, Ruzsa Z, Nicolaides A, Sharma A, Bhatt DL, Suri JS. Low-cost preventive screening using carotid ultrasound in patients with diabetes. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2020; 25:1132-1171. [PMID: 32114427 DOI: 10.2741/4850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes and atherosclerosis are the predominant causes of stroke and cardiovascular disease (CVD) both in low- and high-income countries. This is due to the lack of appropriate medical care or high medical costs. Low-cost 10-year preventive screening can be used for deciding an effective therapy to reduce the effects of atherosclerosis in diabetes patients. American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) recommended the use of 10-year risk calculators, before advising therapy. Conventional risk calculators are suboptimal in certain groups of patients because their stratification depends on (a) current blood biomarkers and (b) clinical phenotypes, such as age, hypertension, ethnicity, and sex. The focus of this review is on risk assessment using innovative composite risk scores that use conventional blood biomarkers combined with vascular image-based phenotypes. AtheroEdge™ tool is beneficial for low-moderate to high-moderate and low-risk to high-risk patients for the current and 10-year risk assessment that outperforms conventional risk calculators. The preventive screening tool that combines the image-based phenotypes with conventional risk factors can improve the 10-year cardiovascular/stroke risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ankush D Jamthikar
- Department of ECE, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of ECE, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
| | - Nizarudeen Shanu
- Department of ECE working with College of Engineering Karunagapally, India
| | - Anudeep Puvvula
- Annu\'s Hospitals for Skin and Diabetes, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy
| | - Tomaz Omerzum
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases Croatia
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention and Research Unit Clinic and Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- R and D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, United kingdom
| | - Chitra S
- Physician Shree polyclinic and lab, India
| | - Shalini Joshi
- Preventive Health Check, Fortis Hospital, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru, India
| | | | | | - Dee H Wu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Cyprus
| | - Aditya Sharma
- Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Advanced Knowledge Engineering Centre, Global Biomedical Technologies, Inc. Roseville, CA, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kokkinidis DG, Strobel A, Jawaid O, Haider MN, Alvandi B, Singh GD, Laird JR, Waldo SW, Armstrong EJ. Development and validation of a predictive score for anterograde crossing of infrapopliteal chronic total occlusions: (The Infrapop‐CTO Score). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 95:748-755. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Damianos G. Kokkinidis
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Aaron Strobel
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Omar Jawaid
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Moosa N. Haider
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of California Davis California
| | - Bejan Alvandi
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of California Davis California
| | - Gagan D. Singh
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of California Davis California
| | - John R. Laird
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of California Davis California
| | - Stephen W. Waldo
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Ehrin J. Armstrong
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kokkinidis DG, Behan S, Jawaid O, Hossain P, Giannopoulos S, Singh GD, Laird JR, Valle JA, Waldo SW, Armstrong EJ. Laser atherectomy and drug‐coated balloons for the treatment of femoropopliteal in‐stent restenosis: 2‐Year outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 95:439-446. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 10/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Damianos G. Kokkinidis
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Sean Behan
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Omar Jawaid
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Prio Hossain
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of California Davis Sacramento California
| | - Stefanos Giannopoulos
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Gagan D. Singh
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of California Davis Sacramento California
| | - John R. Laird
- Vascular Center and Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of California Davis Sacramento California
| | - Javier A. Valle
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Stephen W. Waldo
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| | - Ehrin J. Armstrong
- Division of Cardiology, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical CenterUniversity of Colorado Denver Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Saba L, Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Viskovic K, Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Viswanathan V, Nicolaides A, Bhatt DL, Suri JS. Global perspective on carotid intima-media thickness and plaque: should the current measurement guidelines be revisited? INT ANGIOL 2019; 38:451-465. [PMID: 31782286 DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.19.04267-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque (CP) currently act as risk predictors for CVD/Stroke risk assessment. Over 2000 articles have been published that cover either use cIMT/CP or alterations of cIMT/CP and additional image-based phenotypes to associate cIMT related markers with CVD/Stroke risk. These articles have shown variable results, which likely reflect a lack of standardization in the tools for measurement, risk stratification, and risk assessment. Guidelines for cIMT/CP measurement are influenced by major factors like the atherosclerosis disease itself, conventional risk factors, 10-year measurement tools, types of CVD/Stroke risk calculators, incomplete validation of measurement tools, and the fast pace of computer technology advancements. This review discusses the following major points: 1) the American Society of Echocardiography and Mannheim guidelines for cIMT/CP measurements; 2) forces that influence the guidelines; and 3) calculators for risk stratification and assessment under the influence of advanced intelligence methods. The review also presents the knowledge-based learning strategies such as machine and deep learning which may play a future role in CVD/stroke risk assessment. We conclude that both machine learning and non-machine learning strategies will flourish for current and 10-year CVD/Stroke risk prediction as long as they integrate image-based phenotypes with conventional risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Ankush Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Unit of Rheumatology, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention and Research, Clinic and Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- R and D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabete, Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Center, Chennai, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Center, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart, Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA -
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jamthikar A, Gupta D, Khanna NN, Saba L, Araki T, Viskovic K, Suri HS, Gupta A, Mavrogeni S, Turk M, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Kitas GD, Viswanathan V, Nicolaides A, Bhatt DL, Suri JS. A low-cost machine learning-based cardiovascular/stroke risk assessment system: integration of conventional factors with image phenotypes. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2019; 9:420-430. [PMID: 31737514 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.09.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Most cardiovascular (CV)/stroke risk calculators using the integration of carotid ultrasound image-based phenotypes (CUSIP) with conventional risk factors (CRF) have shown improved risk stratification compared with either method. However such approaches have not yet leveraged the potential of machine learning (ML). Most intelligent ML strategies use follow-ups for the endpoints but are costly and time-intensive. We introduce an integrated ML system using stenosis as an endpoint for training and determine whether such a system can lead to superior performance compared with the conventional ML system. Methods The ML-based algorithm consists of an offline and online system. The offline system extracts 47 features which comprised of 13 CRF and 34 CUSIP. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to select the most significant features. These offline features were then trained using the event-equivalent gold standard (consisting of percentage stenosis) using a random forest (RF) classifier framework to generate training coefficients. The online system then transforms the PCA-based test features using offline trained coefficients to predict the risk labels on test subjects. The above ML system determines the area under the curve (AUC) using a 10-fold cross-validation paradigm. The above system so-called "AtheroRisk-Integrated" was compared against "AtheroRisk-Conventional", where only 13 CRF were considered in a feature set. Results Left and right common carotid arteries of 202 Japanese patients (Toho University, Japan) were retrospectively examined to obtain 395 ultrasound scans. AtheroRisk-Integrated system [AUC =0.80, P<0.0001, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77 to 0.84] showed an improvement of ~18% against AtheroRisk-Conventional ML (AUC =0.68, P<0.0001, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.72). Conclusions ML-based integrated model with the event-equivalent gold standard as percentage stenosis is powerful and offers low cost and high performance CV/stroke risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush Jamthikar
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Deep Gupta
- Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Tadashi Araki
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound, University Hospital for Infectious Diseases Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Harman S Suri
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - Monika Turk
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St. Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention & Research Unit Clinic & Laboratory of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- M.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre and University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Saba L, Biswas M, Suri HS, Viskovic K, Laird JR, Cuadrado-Godia E, Nicolaides A, Khanna NN, Viswanathan V, Suri JS. Ultrasound-based carotid stenosis measurement and risk stratification in diabetic cohort: a deep learning paradigm. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2019; 9:439-461. [PMID: 31737516 PMCID: PMC6837906 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.09.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stroke is in the top three leading causes of death worldwide. Non-invasive monitoring of stroke can be accomplished via stenosis measurements. The current conventional image-based methods for these measurements are not accurate and reliable. They do not incorporate shape and intelligent learning component in their design. METHODS In this study, we propose a deep learning (DL)-based methodology for accurate measurement of stenosis in common carotid artery (CCA) ultrasound (US) scans using a class of AtheroEdge system from AtheroPoint, USA. Three radiologists manually traced the lumen-intima (LI) for the near and the far walls, respectively, which served as a gold standard (GS) for training the DL-based model. Three DL-based systems were developed based on three types of GS. RESULTS IRB approved (Toho University, Japan) 407 US scans from 204 patients were collected. The risk was characterized into three classes: low, moderate, and high-risk. The area-under-curve (AUC) corresponding to three DL systems using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis computed were: 0.90, 0.94 and 0.86, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Novel DL-based strategy showed reliable, accurate and stable stenosis severity index (SSI) measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U., Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mainak Biswas
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, JIS University, Agarpara, Kolkata, India
| | | | - Klaudija Viskovic
- Department of Radiology and Ultrasound University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist, St. Helena Hospital, Napa Valley, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, London, UK
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - N. N. Khanna
- Cardiology Department, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes and Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shishehbor MH, Schneider PA, Zeller T, Razavi MK, Laird JR, Wang H, Tieché C, Parikh SA, Iida O, Jaff MR. Total IN.PACT drug-coated balloon initiative reporting pooled imaging and propensity-matched cohorts. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70:1177-1191.e9. [PMID: 31543165 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Randomized controlled trials have shown that drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide superior results compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease. However, these trials have generally included short lesions, few occlusions, and small sample sizes. The present study was an individual-level pooled analysis of duplex ultrasonography (DUS) core laboratory-adjudicated and clinical events committee-adjudicated IN.PACT Admiral DCB subjects across two randomized controlled trials and two single-arm prospective studies to characterize the safety and effectiveness of DCB compared with PTA. METHODS The subjects were treated with DCB (n = 926) or PTA (n = 143). The end points through 12 months included DUS core laboratory-adjudicated primary patency and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) using Kaplan-Meier estimates and primary safety using proportions. A propensity-matched analysis of DCB (n = 466) to PTA (n = 136) was conducted to address confounders. RESULTS At 12 months, DCB compared with PTA had significantly greater primary patency (88.8% vs 53.9%; P < .001), freedom from CD-TLR (94.3% vs 80.2%; P < .001), and better primary safety composite end point (94.1% vs 78.0%; P < .001). After propensity-matched analysis, DCB remained superior to PTA at 12 months for primary patency (90.5% vs 53.8%; P < .001), freedom from CD-TLR (96.9% vs 80.7%; P < .001), and the primary safety composite end point (96.3% vs 78.4%; P < .001). Across multiple prespecified subgroup analyses, including provisional stenting, DCB remained persistently superior to PTA. CONCLUSIONS In the largest, DUS core laboratory-adjudicated, multiethnic, pooled DCB series to date, the IN.PACT Admiral DCB demonstrated significantly greater primary patency, freedom from CD-TLR, and better composite safety at 12 months compared with PTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi H Shishehbor
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Peter A Schneider
- Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Thomas Zeller
- Department of Angiology, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | | | - John R Laird
- Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, Calif
| | | | | | - Sahil A Parikh
- College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Osamu Iida
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schneider PA, Laird JR, Tepe G, Brodmann M, Zeller T, Scheinert D, Metzger C, Micari A, Sachar R, Jaff MR, Wang H, Hasenbank MS, Krishnan P. Treatment Effect of Drug-Coated Balloons Is Durable to 3 Years in the Femoropopliteal Arteries: Long-Term Results of the IN.PACT SFA Randomized Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 11:e005891. [PMID: 29326153 PMCID: PMC5771683 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.117.005891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background— Randomized controlled trials have reported favorable 1-year outcomes with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease when compared with standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Evidence remains limited on the durability of the treatment effect with DCBs in the longer term. Methods and Results— IN.PACT SFA is a single-blind, randomized trial (Randomized Trial of IN.PACT Admiral Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty [PTA] Balloon Catheter vs Standard PTA for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery [SFA] and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery [PPA]) that enrolled 331 patients with symptomatic (Rutherford 2–4) femoropopliteal lesions up to 18 cm in length. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive treatment with DCB or PTA. The 36-month assessments included primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, major adverse events, and functional outcomes. At 36 months, primary patency remained significantly higher among patients treated with DCB compared with PTA (69.5% versus 45.1%; log rank P<0.001). The rates of clinically driven target lesion revascularization were 15.2% and 31.1% (P=0.002) for the DCB and PTA groups, respectively. Functional outcomes were similarly improved between treatment groups even though subjects in the DCB group required significantly fewer reinterventions versus those in the PTA group (P<0.001 for target lesion revascularization, P=0.001 for target vessel revascularization). There were no device- or procedure-related deaths as adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Conclusions— Three-year results demonstrate a durable and superior treatment effect among patients treated with DCB versus standard PTA, with significantly higher primary patency and lower clinically driven target lesion revascularization, resulting in similar functional improvements with reduced need for repeat interventions. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01175850 for IN.PACT SFA phase I in the European Union and NCT01566461 for IN.PACT SFA phase II in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Schneider
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.).
| | - John R Laird
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Gunnar Tepe
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Marianne Brodmann
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Thomas Zeller
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Dierk Scheinert
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Christopher Metzger
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Antonio Micari
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Ravish Sachar
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Michael R Jaff
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Hong Wang
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Melissa S Hasenbank
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | - Prakash Krishnan
- From the Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.); Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena Hospital, CA (J.R.L.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RoMed Klinikum, Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.); Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Medical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.); Angiology Division, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.); Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.); Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center, Kingsport, TN (C.M.); GVM Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy (A.M.); North Carolina Heart and Vascular, UNC-REX Health Care, Raleigh, NC (R.S.); Newton-Wellesley Hospital, MA (M.R.J.); Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.S.H.); and Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (P.K.)
| | | |
Collapse
|