1
|
Kumari V, Kumar N, Kumar K S, Kumar A, Skandha SS, Saxena S, Khanna NN, Laird JR, Singh N, Fouda MM, Saba L, Singh R, Suri JS. Deep Learning Paradigm and Its Bias for Coronary Artery Wall Segmentation in Intravascular Ultrasound Scans: A Closer Look. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:485. [PMID: 38132653 PMCID: PMC10743870 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10120485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION Coronary artery disease (CAD) has the highest mortality rate; therefore, its diagnosis is vital. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a high-resolution imaging solution that can image coronary arteries, but the diagnosis software via wall segmentation and quantification has been evolving. In this study, a deep learning (DL) paradigm was explored along with its bias. METHODS Using a PRISMA model, 145 best UNet-based and non-UNet-based methods for wall segmentation were selected and analyzed for their characteristics and scientific and clinical validation. This study computed the coronary wall thickness by estimating the inner and outer borders of the coronary artery IVUS cross-sectional scans. Further, the review explored the bias in the DL system for the first time when it comes to wall segmentation in IVUS scans. Three bias methods, namely (i) ranking, (ii) radial, and (iii) regional area, were applied and compared using a Venn diagram. Finally, the study presented explainable AI (XAI) paradigms in the DL framework. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS UNet provides a powerful paradigm for the segmentation of coronary walls in IVUS scans due to its ability to extract automated features at different scales in encoders, reconstruct the segmented image using decoders, and embed the variants in skip connections. Most of the research was hampered by a lack of motivation for XAI and pruned AI (PAI) models. None of the UNet models met the criteria for bias-free design. For clinical assessment and settings, it is necessary to move from a paper-to-practice approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vandana Kumari
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India; (V.K.); (S.K.K.)
| | - Naresh Kumar
- Department of Applied Computational Science and Engineering, G L Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida 201310, India
| | - Sampath Kumar K
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, India; (V.K.); (S.K.K.)
| | - Ashish Kumar
- School of CSET, Bennett University, Greater Noida 201310, India;
| | - Sanagala S. Skandha
- Department of CSE, CMR College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad 501401, India;
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar 751003, India;
| | - Narendra N. Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India;
| | - John R. Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA 94574, USA;
| | - Narpinder Singh
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India;
| | - Mostafa M. Fouda
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209, USA;
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), 09100 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Rajesh Singh
- Department of Research and Innovation, Uttaranchal Institute of Technology, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India;
| | - Jasjit S. Suri
- Stroke Diagnostics and Monitoring Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
- Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Graphic Era, Deemed to be University, Dehradun 248002, India
- Monitoring and Diagnosis Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Skandha SS, Gupta SK, Saba L, Koppula VK, Johri AM, Khanna NN, Mavrogeni S, Laird JR, Pareek G, Miner M, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Sharma AM, Viswanathan V, Rathore VS, Turk M, Kolluri R, Viskovic K, Cuadrado-Godia E, Kitas GD, Nicolaides A, Suri JS. 3-D optimized classification and characterization artificial intelligence paradigm for cardiovascular/stroke risk stratification using carotid ultrasound-based delineated plaque: Atheromatic™ 2.0. Comput Biol Med 2020; 125:103958. [PMID: 32927257 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Atherosclerotic plaque tissue rupture is one of the leading causes of strokes. Early carotid plaque monitoring can help reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Manual ultrasound plaque classification and characterization methods are time-consuming and can be imprecise due to significant variations in tissue characteristics. We report a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based plaque tissue classification and characterization system. METHODS We hypothesize that symptomatic plaque is hypoechoic due to its large lipid core and minimal collagen, as well as its heterogeneous makeup. Meanwhile, asymptomatic plaque is hyperechoic due to its small lipid core, abundant collagen, and the fact that it is often calcified. We designed a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system consisting of three kinds of deep learning (DL) classification paradigms: Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN), Visual Geometric Group-16 (VGG16), and transfer learning, (tCNN). DCNN was 3-D optimized by varying the number of CNN layers and data augmentation frameworks. The DL systems were benchmarked against four types of machine learning (ML) classification systems, and the CADx system was characterized using two novel strategies consisting of DL mean feature strength (MFS) and a bispectrum model using higher-order spectra. RESULTS After balancing symptomatic and asymptomatic plaque classes, a five-fold augmentation process was applied, yielding 1000 carotid scans in each class. Then, using a K10 protocol (trained to test the ratio of 90%-10%), tCNN and DCNN yielded accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)) pairs of 83.33%, 0.833 (p < 0.0001) and 95.66%, 0.956 (p < 0.0001), respectively. DCNN was superior to ML by 7.01%. As part of the characterization process, the MFS of the symptomatic plaque was found to be higher compared to the asymptomatic plaque by 17.5% (p < 0.0001). A similar pattern was seen in the bispectrum, which was higher for symptomatic plaque by 5.4% (p < 0.0001). It took <2 s to perform the online CADx process on a supercomputer. CONCLUSIONS The performance order of the three AI systems was DCNN > tCNN > ML. Bispectrum-based on higher-order spectra proved a powerful paradigm for plaque tissue characterization. Overall, the AI-based systems offer a powerful solution for plaque tissue classification and characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanagala S Skandha
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India; CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Suneet K Gupta
- CSE Department, Bennett University, Greater Noida, UP, India
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Vijaya K Koppula
- CSE Department, CMR College of Engineering & Technology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Amer M Johri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Narendra N Khanna
- Department of Cardiology, Indraprastha APOLLO Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Sophie Mavrogeni
- Cardiology Clinic, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece
| | - John R Laird
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Adventist Health St. Helena, St Helena, CA, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Martin Miner
- Men's Health Center, Miriam Hospital Providence, RI, USA
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Rheumatology Unit, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Protogerou
- Department of Cardiovascular Prevention, National and Kapodistrian Univ. of Athens, Greece
| | - Durga P Misra
- Dept. of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Vikas Agarwal
- Dept. of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India
| | - Aditya M Sharma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, VA, USA
| | - Vijay Viswanathan
- MV Hospital for Diabetes & Professor M Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India
| | - Vijay S Rathore
- Nephrology Department, Kaiser Permanente, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Monika Turk
- The Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
| | | | | | | | - George D Kitas
- R & D Academic Affairs, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK
| | - Andrew Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|