1
|
Oehrn CR, Cernera S, Hammer LH, Shcherbakova M, Yao J, Hahn A, Wang S, Ostrem JL, Little S, Starr PA. Chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation versus conventional stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a blinded randomized feasibility trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:3345-3356. [PMID: 39160351 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03196-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but lacks dynamic responsiveness to changing clinical and neural states. Feedback control might improve therapeutic effectiveness, but the optimal control strategy and additional benefits of 'adaptive' neurostimulation are unclear. Here we present the results of a blinded randomized cross-over pilot trial aimed at determining the neural correlates of specific motor signs in individuals with PD and the feasibility of using these signals to drive adaptive DBS. Four male patients with PD were recruited from a population undergoing DBS implantation for motor fluctuations, with each patient receiving adaptive DBS and continuous DBS. We identified stimulation-entrained gamma oscillations in the subthalamic nucleus or motor cortex as optimal markers of high versus low dopaminergic states and their associated residual motor signs in all four patients. We then demonstrated improved motor symptoms and quality of life with adaptive compared to clinically optimized standard stimulation. The results of this pilot trial highlight the promise of personalized adaptive neurostimulation in PD based on data-driven selection of neural signals. Furthermore, these findings provide the foundation for further larger clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of personalized adaptive neurostimulation in PD and other neurological disorders. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03582891 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina R Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren H Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Shcherbakova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jiaang Yao
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herbozo Contreras LF, Truong ND, Eshraghian JK, Xu Z, Huang Z, Bersani–Veroni TV, Aguilar I, Leung WH, Nikpour A, Kavehei O. Neuromorphic neuromodulation: Towards the next generation of closed-loop neurostimulation. PNAS NEXUS 2024; 3:pgae488. [PMID: 39554511 PMCID: PMC11565243 DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
Neuromodulation techniques have emerged as promising approaches for treating a wide range of neurological disorders, precisely delivering electrical stimulation to modulate abnormal neuronal activity. While leveraging the unique capabilities of AI holds immense potential for responsive neurostimulation, it appears as an extremely challenging proposition where real-time (low-latency) processing, low-power consumption, and heat constraints are limiting factors. The use of sophisticated AI-driven models for personalized neurostimulation depends on the back-telemetry of data to external systems (e.g. cloud-based medical mesosystems and ecosystems). While this can be a solution, integrating continuous learning within implantable neuromodulation devices for several applications, such as seizure prediction in epilepsy, is an open question. We believe neuromorphic architectures hold an outstanding potential to open new avenues for sophisticated on-chip analysis of neural signals and AI-driven personalized treatments. With more than three orders of magnitude reduction in the total data required for data processing and feature extraction, the high power- and memory-efficiency of neuromorphic computing to hardware-firmware co-design can be considered as the solution-in-the-making to resource-constraint implantable neuromodulation systems. This perspective introduces the concept of Neuromorphic Neuromodulation, a new breed of closed-loop responsive feedback system. It highlights its potential to revolutionize implantable brain-machine microsystems for patient-specific treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nhan Duy Truong
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Sydney Nano Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jason K Eshraghian
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064, USA
| | - Zhangyu Xu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Zhaojing Huang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | | | - Isabelle Aguilar
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Wing Hang Leung
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Omid Kavehei
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Sydney Nano Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cho H, Benjaber M, Alexis Gkogkidis C, Buchheit M, Ruiz-Rodriguez JF, Grannan BL, Weaver KE, Ko AL, Cramer SC, Ojemann JG, Denison T, Herron JA. Development and Evaluation of a Real-Time Phase-Triggered Stimulation Algorithm for the CorTec Brain Interchange. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2024; 32:3625-3635. [PMID: 39264785 PMCID: PMC11485249 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2024.3459801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
With the development and characterization of biomarkers that may reflect neural network state as well as a patient's clinical deficits, there is growing interest in more complex stimulation designs. While current implantable neuromodulation systems offer pathways to expand the design and application of adaptive stimulation paradigms, technological drawbacks of these systems limit adaptive neuromodulation exploration. In this paper, we discuss the implementation of a phase-triggered stimulation paradigm using a research platform composed of an investigational system known as the CorTec Brain Interchange (CorTec GmbH, Freiburg, Germany), and an open-source software tool known as OMNI-BIC. We then evaluate the stimulation paradigm's performance in both benchtop and in vivo human demonstrations. Our findings indicate that the Brain Interchange and OMNI-BIC platform is capable of reliable administration of phase-triggered stimulation and has the potential to help expand investigation within the adaptive neuromodulation design space.
Collapse
|
4
|
Stanslaski S, Summers RLS, Tonder L, Tan Y, Case M, Raike RS, Morelli N, Herrington TM, Beudel M, Ostrem JL, Little S, Almeida L, Ramirez-Zamora A, Fasano A, Hassell T, Mitchell KT, Moro E, Gostkowski M, Sarangmat N, Bronte-Stewart H. Sensing data and methodology from the Adaptive DBS Algorithm for Personalized Therapy in Parkinson's Disease (ADAPT-PD) clinical trial. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2024; 10:174. [PMID: 39289373 PMCID: PMC11408616 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-024-00772-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is an emerging advancement in DBS technology; however, local field potential (LFP) signal rate detection sufficient for aDBS algorithms and the methods to set-up aDBS have yet to be defined. Here we summarize sensing data and aDBS programming steps associated with the ongoing Adaptive DBS Algorithm for Personalized Therapy in Parkinson's Disease (ADAPT-PD) pivotal trial (NCT04547712). Sixty-eight patients were enrolled with either subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus DBS leads connected to a Medtronic PerceptTM PC neurostimulator. During the enrollment and screening procedures, a LFP (8-30 Hz, ≥1.2 µVp) control signal was identified by clinicians in 84.8% of patients on medication (65% bilateral signal), and in 92% of patients off medication (78% bilateral signal). The ADAPT-PD trial sensing data indicate a high LFP signal presence in both on and off medication states of these patients, with bilateral signal in the majority, regardless of PD phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Stanslaski
- Medtronic Neuromodulation, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | | | - Lisa Tonder
- Medtronic Neuromodulation, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ye Tan
- Medtronic Neuromodulation, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michelle Case
- Medtronic Neuromodulation, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert S Raike
- Medtronic Neuromodulation, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nathan Morelli
- Medtronic Neuromodulation, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Martijn Beudel
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
- Department of Neurology, Shands at University of Florida, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Krembil Brain Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Travis Hassell
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Kyle T Mitchell
- Duke University Movement Disorders Center, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Michal Gostkowski
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, USA
| | | | - Helen Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoy CW, de Hemptinne C, Wang SS, Harmer CJ, Apps MAJ, Husain M, Starr PA, Little S. Beta and theta oscillations track effort and previous reward in the human basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex during decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2322869121. [PMID: 39047043 PMCID: PMC11295073 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2322869121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Choosing whether to exert effort to obtain rewards is fundamental to human motivated behavior. However, the neural dynamics underlying the evaluation of reward and effort in humans is poorly understood. Here, we report an exploratory investigation into this with chronic intracranial recordings from the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and basal ganglia (BG; subthalamic nuclei and globus pallidus) in people with Parkinson's disease performing a decision-making task with offers that varied in levels of reward and physical effort required. This revealed dissociable neural signatures of reward and effort, with BG beta (12 to 20 Hz) oscillations tracking effort on a single-trial basis and PFC theta (4 to 7 Hz) signaling previous trial reward, with no effects of net subjective value. Stimulation of PFC increased overall acceptance of offers and sensitivity to reward while decreasing the impact of effort on choices. This work uncovers oscillatory mechanisms that guide fundamental decisions to exert effort for reward across BG and PFC, supports a causal role of PFC for such choices, and seeds hypotheses for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin W. Hoy
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA94143
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL32608
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL32608
| | - Sarah S. Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA94143
| | - Catherine J. Harmer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 7JX, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew A. J. Apps
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX2 6GG, United Kingdom
- Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham UKB15 2TT, United Kingdom
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, BirminghamB15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Masud Husain
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, OxfordOX2 6GG, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, OxfordOX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA94143, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA94143
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilkins KB, Petrucci MN, Lambert EF, Melbourne JA, Gala AS, Akella P, Parisi L, Cui C, Kehnemouyi YM, Hoffman SL, Aditham S, Diep C, Dorris HJ, Parker JE, Herron JA, Bronte-Stewart HM. Beta Burst-Driven Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Improves Gait Impairment and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.06.26.24309418. [PMID: 38978669 PMCID: PMC11230310 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.26.24309418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
Background Freezing of gait (FOG) is a debilitating symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) that is often refractory to medication. Pathological prolonged beta bursts within the subthalamic nucleus (STN) are associated with both worse impairment and freezing behavior in PD, which are improved with deep brain stimulation (DBS). The goal of the current study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of beta burst-driven adaptive DBS (aDBS) for FOG in PD. Methods Seven individuals with PD were implanted with the investigational Summit™ RC+S DBS system (Medtronic, PLC) with leads placed bilaterally in the STN. A PC-in-the-loop architecture was used to adjust stimulation amplitude in real-time based on the observed beta burst durations in the STN. Participants performed either a harnessed stepping-in-place task or a free walking turning and barrier course, as well as clinical motor assessments and instrumented measures of bradykinesia, OFF stimulation, on aDBS, continuous DBS (cDBS), or random intermittent DBS (iDBS). Results Beta burst driven aDBS was successfully implemented and deemed safe and tolerable in all seven participants. Gait metrics such as overall percent time freezing and mean peak shank angular velocity improved from OFF to aDBS and showed similar efficacy as cDBS. Similar improvements were also seen for overall clinical motor impairment, including tremor, as well as quantitative metrics of bradykinesia. Conclusion Beta burst driven adaptive DBS was feasible, safe, and tolerable in individuals with PD with gait impairment and FOG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K B Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - M N Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford Schools of Engineering & Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - E F Lambert
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - J A Melbourne
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - A S Gala
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - P Akella
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - L Parisi
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - C Cui
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Y M Kehnemouyi
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford Schools of Engineering & Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - S L Hoffman
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - S Aditham
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - C Diep
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - H J Dorris
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - J E Parker
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - J A Herron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - H M Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Swinnen BEKS, Hoy CW, Pegolo E, Matzilevich EU, Sun J, Ishihara B, Morgante F, Pereira E, Baig F, Hart M, Tan H, Sawacha Z, Beudel M, Wang S, Starr P, Little S, Ricciardi L. Basal ganglia theta power indexes trait anxiety in people with Parkinson's disease. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.06.04.24308449. [PMID: 38883720 PMCID: PMC11177918 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.04.24308449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common and disabling in Parkinson's disease (PD), with troublesome anxiety occurring in one-third of patients. Management of anxiety in PD is challenging, hampered by insufficient insight into underlying mechanisms, lack of objective anxiety measurements, and largely ineffective treatments.In this study, we assessed the intracranial neurophysiological correlates of anxiety in PD patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the laboratory and at home. We hypothesized that low-frequency (theta-alpha) activity would be associated with anxiety. Methods We recorded local field potentials (LFP) from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) DBS implants in three PD cohorts: 1) patients with recordings (STN) performed in hospital at rest via perioperatively externalized leads, without active stimulation, both ON or OFF dopaminergic medication; 2) patients with recordings (STN or GPi) performed at home while resting, via a chronically implanted commercially available sensing-enabled neurostimulator (Medtronic Percept™ device), ON dopaminergic medication, with stimulation both ON or OFF; 3) patients with recordings performed at home while engaging in a behavioral task via STN and GPi leads and electrocorticography paddles (ECoG) over premotor cortex connected to an investigational sensing-enabled neurostimulator, ON dopaminergic medication, with stimulation both ON or OFF.Trait anxiety was measured with validated clinical scales in all participants, and state anxiety was measured with momentary assessment scales at multiple time points in the two at-home cohorts. Power in theta (4-8 Hz) and alpha (8-12 Hz) ranges were extracted from the LFP recordings, and their relation with anxiety ratings was assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Results In total, 33 PD patients (59 hemispheres) were included. Across three independent cohorts, with stimulation OFF, basal ganglia theta power was positively related to trait anxiety (all p<0.05). Also in a naturalistic setting, with individuals at home at rest with stimulation and medication ON, basal ganglia theta power was positively related to trait anxiety (p<0.05). This relationship held regardless of the hemisphere and DBS target. There was no correlation between trait anxiety and premotor cortical theta-alpha power. There was no within-patient association between basal ganglia theta-alpha power and state anxiety. Conclusion We showed that basal ganglia theta activity indexes trait anxiety in PD. Our data suggest that theta could be a possible physiomarker of neuropsychiatric symptoms and specifically of anxiety in PD, potentially suitable for guiding advanced DBS treatment tailored to the individual patient's needs, including non-motor symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart E K S Swinnen
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Colin W Hoy
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elena Pegolo
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Neurosciences and Cell Biology Institute, Neuromodulation and Motor Control Section, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Julia Sun
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bryony Ishihara
- Neurosciences and Cell Biology Institute, Neuromodulation and Motor Control Section, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca Morgante
- Neurosciences and Cell Biology Institute, Neuromodulation and Motor Control Section, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erlick Pereira
- Neurosciences and Cell Biology Institute, Neuromodulation and Motor Control Section, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fahd Baig
- Neurosciences and Cell Biology Institute, Neuromodulation and Motor Control Section, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hart
- Neurosciences and Cell Biology Institute, Neuromodulation and Motor Control Section, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Huiling Tan
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Zimi Sawacha
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Martijn Beudel
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip Starr
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lucia Ricciardi
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Neurosciences and Cell Biology Institute, Neuromodulation and Motor Control Section, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Olaru M, Cernera S, Hahn A, Wozny TA, Anso J, de Hemptinne C, Little S, Neumann WJ, Abbasi-Asl R, Starr PA. Motor network gamma oscillations in chronic home recordings predict dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. Brain 2024; 147:2038-2052. [PMID: 38195196 PMCID: PMC11146421 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
In Parkinson's disease, imbalances between 'antikinetic' and 'prokinetic' patterns of neuronal oscillatory activity are related to motor dysfunction. Invasive brain recordings from the motor network have suggested that medical or surgical therapy can promote a prokinetic state by inducing narrowband gamma rhythms (65-90 Hz). Excessive narrowband gamma in the motor cortex promotes dyskinesia in rodent models, but the relationship between narrowband gamma and dyskinesia in humans has not been well established. To assess this relationship, we used a sensing-enabled deep brain stimulator system, attached to both motor cortex and basal ganglia (subthalamic or pallidal) leads, paired with wearable devices that continuously tracked motor signs in the contralateral upper limbs. We recorded 984 h of multisite field potentials in 30 hemispheres of 16 subjects with Parkinson's disease (2/16 female, mean age 57 ± 12 years) while at home on usual antiparkinsonian medications. Recordings were done 2-4 weeks after implantation, prior to starting therapeutic stimulation. Narrowband gamma was detected in the precentral gyrus, subthalamic nucleus or both structures on at least one side of 92% of subjects with a clinical history of dyskinesia. Narrowband gamma was not detected in the globus pallidus. Narrowband gamma spectral power in both structures co-fluctuated similarly with contralateral wearable dyskinesia scores (mean correlation coefficient of ρ = 0.48 with a range of 0.12-0.82 for cortex, ρ = 0.53 with a range of 0.5-0.77 for subthalamic nucleus). Stratification analysis showed the correlations were not driven by outlier values, and narrowband gamma could distinguish 'on' periods with dyskinesia from 'on' periods without dyskinesia. Time lag comparisons confirmed that gamma oscillations herald dyskinesia onset without a time lag in either structure when using 2-min epochs. A linear model incorporating the three oscillatory bands (beta, theta/alpha and narrowband gamma) increased the predictive power of dyskinesia for several subject hemispheres. We further identified spectrally distinct oscillations in the low gamma range (40-60 Hz) in three subjects, but the relationship of low gamma oscillations to dyskinesia was variable. Our findings support the hypothesis that excessive oscillatory activity at 65-90 Hz in the motor network tracks with dyskinesia similarly across both structures, without a detectable time lag. This rhythm may serve as a promising control signal for closed-loop deep brain stimulation using either cortical or subthalamic detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Olaru
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Thomas A Wozny
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Juan Anso
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida Gainesville, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Reza Abbasi-Asl
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kremen V, Sladky V, Mivalt F, Gregg NM, Balzekas I, Marks V, Brinkmann BH, Lundstrom BN, Cui J, St Louis EK, Croarkin P, Alden EC, Fields J, Crockett K, Adolf J, Bilderbeek J, Hermes D, Messina S, Miller KJ, Van Gompel J, Denison T, Worrell GA. A platform for brain network sensing and stimulation with quantitative behavioral tracking: Application to limbic circuit epilepsy. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.02.09.24302358. [PMID: 38370724 PMCID: PMC10871449 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.09.24302358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Temporal lobe epilepsy is a common neurological disease characterized by recurrent seizures. These seizures often originate from limbic networks and people also experience chronic comorbidities related to memory, mood, and sleep (MMS). Deep brain stimulation targeting the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) is a proven therapy, but the optimal stimulation parameters remain unclear. We developed a neurotechnology platform for tracking seizures and MMS to enable data streaming between an investigational brain sensing-stimulation implant, mobile devices, and a cloud environment. Artificial Intelligence algorithms provided accurate catalogs of seizures, interictal epileptiform spikes, and wake-sleep brain states. Remotely administered memory and mood assessments were used to densely sample cognitive and behavioral response during ANT-DBS. We evaluated the efficacy of low-frequency versus high-frequency ANT-DBS. They both reduced seizures, but low-frequency ANT-DBS showed greater reductions and better sleep and memory. These results highlight the potential of synchronized brain sensing and behavioral tracking for optimizing neuromodulation therapy.
Collapse
|
10
|
Okun MS, Cagle J, Gomez J, Bowers D, Wong J, Foote KD, Gunduz A. Responsive deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Tourette syndrome. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6467. [PMID: 38499664 PMCID: PMC10948908 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57071-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
To report the results of 'responsive' deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Tourette syndrome (TS) in a National Institutes of Health funded experimental cohort. The use of 'brain derived physiology' as a method to trigger DBS devices to deliver trains of electrical stimulation is a proposed approach to address the paroxysmal motor and vocal tic symptoms which appear as part of TS. Ten subjects underwent bilateral staged DBS surgery and each was implanted with bilateral centromedian thalamic (CM) region DBS leads and bilateral M1 region cortical strips. A series of identical experiments and data collections were conducted on three groups of consecutively recruited subjects. Group 1 (n = 2) underwent acute responsive DBS using deep and superficial leads. Group 2 (n = 4) underwent chronic responsive DBS using deep and superficial leads. Group 3 (n = 4) underwent responsive DBS using only the deep leads. The primary outcome measure for each of the 8 subjects with chronic responsive DBS was calculated as the pre-operative baseline Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) motor subscore compared to the 6 month embedded responsive DBS setting. A responder for the study was defined as any subject manifesting a ≥ 30 points improvement on the YGTSS motor subscale. The videotaped Modified Rush Tic Rating Scale (MRVTRS) was a secondary outcome. Outcomes were collected at 6 months across three different device states: no stimulation, conventional open-loop stimulation, and embedded responsive stimulation. The experience programming each of the groups and the methods applied for programming were captured. There were 10 medication refractory TS subjects enrolled in the study (5 male and 5 female) and 4/8 (50%) in the chronic responsive eligible cohort met the primary outcome manifesting a reduction of the YGTSS motor scale of ≥ 30% when on responsive DBS settings. Proof of concept for the use of responsive stimulation was observed in all three groups (acute responsive, cortically triggered and deep DBS leads only). The responsive approach was safe and well tolerated. TS power spectral changes associated with tics occurred consistently in the low frequency 2-10 Hz delta-theta-low alpha oscillation range. The study highlighted the variety of programming strategies which were employed to achieve responsive DBS and those used to overcome stimulation induced artifacts. Proof of concept was also established for a single DBS lead triggering bi-hemispheric delivery of therapeutic stimulation. Responsive DBS was applied to treat TS related motor and vocal tics through the application of three different experimental paradigms. The approach was safe and effective in a subset of individuals. The use of different devices in this study was not aimed at making between device comparisons, but rather, the study was adapted to the current state of the art in technology. Overall, four of the chronic responsive eligible subjects met the primary outcome variable for clinical effectiveness. Cortical physiology was used to trigger responsive DBS when therapy was limited by stimulation induced artifacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 3011 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Jackson Cagle
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 3011 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA
| | - Julieth Gomez
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Dawn Bowers
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Joshua Wong
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 3011 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 3011 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, 3011 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schmidt SL, Chowdhury AH, Mitchell KT, Peters JJ, Gao Q, Lee HJ, Genty K, Chow SC, Grill WM, Pajic M, Turner DA. At home adaptive dual target deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease with proportional control. Brain 2024; 147:911-922. [PMID: 38128546 PMCID: PMC10907084 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Continuous deep brain stimulation (cDBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. The relative benefit of one region over the other is of great interest but cannot usually be compared in the same patient. Simultaneous DBS of both regions may synergistically increase the therapeutic benefit. Continuous DBS is limited by a lack of responsiveness to dynamic, fluctuating symptoms intrinsic to the disease. Adaptive DBS (aDBS) adjusts stimulation in response to biomarkers to improve efficacy, side effects, and efficiency. We combined bilateral DBS of both STN and globus pallidus (dual target DBS) in a prospective within-participant, clinical trial in six patients with Parkinson's disease (n = 6, 55-65 years, n = 2 females). Dual target cDBS was tested for Parkinson's disease symptom control annually over 2 years, measured by motor rating scales, on time without dyskinesia, and medication reduction. Random amplitude experiments probed system dynamics to estimate parameters for aDBS. We then implemented proportional-plus-integral aDBS using a novel distributed (off-implant) architecture. In the home setting, we collected tremor and dyskinesia scores as well as individualized β and DBS amplitudes. Dual target cDBS reduced motor symptoms as measured by Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to a greater degree than either region alone (P < 0.05, linear mixed model) in the cohort. The amplitude of β-oscillations in the STN correlated to the speed of hand grasp movements for five of six participants (P < 0.05, Pearson correlation). Random amplitude experiments provided insight into temporal windowing to avoid stimulation artefacts and demonstrated a correlation between STN β amplitude and DBS amplitude. Proportional plus integral control of aDBS reduced average power, while preserving UPDRS III scores in the clinic (P = 0.28, Wilcoxon signed rank), and tremor and dyskinesia scores during blinded testing at home (n = 3, P > 0.05, Wilcoxon ranked sum). In the home setting, DBS power reductions were slight but significant. Dual target cDBS may offer an improvement in treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease over DBS of either the STN or globus pallidus alone. When combined with proportional plus integral aDBS, stimulation power may be reduced, while preserving the increased benefit of dual target DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen L Schmidt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Afsana H Chowdhury
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Kyle T Mitchell
- Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jennifer J Peters
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Qitong Gao
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Hui-Jie Lee
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Katherine Genty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Shein-Chung Chow
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Miroslav Pajic
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Dennis A Turner
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sermon JJ, Benjaber M, Duchet B, Anso J, Olaru M, Starr PA, Denison T. 1:2 entrainment is not a device-induced artefact, except when it is. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:149-151. [PMID: 38331023 PMCID: PMC7615995 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James J Sermon
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Moaad Benjaber
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Benoit Duchet
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Juan Anso
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Olaru
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Timothy Denison
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Rheede JJ, Alagapan S, Denison TJ, Riva-Posse P, Rozell CJ, Mayberg HS, Waters AC, Sharott A. Cortical signatures of sleep are altered following effective deep brain stimulation for depression. Transl Psychiatry 2024; 14:103. [PMID: 38378677 PMCID: PMC10879134 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-02816-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subcallosal cingulate cortex (SCC) is an experimental therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Chronic SCC DBS leads to long-term changes in the electrophysiological dynamics measured from local field potential (LFP) during wakefulness, but it is unclear how it impacts sleep-related brain activity. This is a crucial gap in knowledge, given the link between depression and sleep disturbances, and an emerging interest in the interaction between DBS, sleep, and circadian rhythms. We therefore sought to characterize changes in electrophysiological markers of sleep associated with DBS treatment for depression. We analyzed key electrophysiological signatures of sleep-slow-wave activity (SWA, 0.5-4.5 Hz) and sleep spindles-in LFPs recorded from the SCC of 9 patients who responded to DBS for TRD. This allowed us to compare the electrophysiological changes before and after 24 weeks of therapeutically effective SCC DBS. SWA power was highly correlated between hemispheres, consistent with a global sleep state. Furthermore, SWA occurred earlier in the night after chronic DBS and had a more prominent peak. While we found no evidence for changes to slow-wave power or stability, we found an increase in the density of sleep spindles. Our results represent a first-of-its-kind report on long-term electrophysiological markers of sleep recorded from the SCC in patients with TRD, and provides evidence of earlier NREM sleep and increased sleep spindle activity following clinically effective DBS treatment. Future work is needed to establish the causal relationship between long-term DBS and the neural mechanisms underlying sleep.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joram J van Rheede
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Sankaraleengam Alagapan
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Timothy J Denison
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Patricio Riva-Posse
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christopher J Rozell
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allison C Waters
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Sharott
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sanger ZT, Henry TR, Park MC, Darrow D, McGovern RA, Netoff TI. Neural signal data collection and analysis of Percept™ PC BrainSense recordings for thalamic stimulation in epilepsy. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:10.1088/1741-2552/ad1dc3. [PMID: 38211344 PMCID: PMC11299490 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad1dc3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) using Medtronic's Percept™ PC implantable pulse generator is FDA-approved for treating Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor, dystonia, obsessive compulsive disorder, and epilepsy. Percept™ PC enables simultaneous recording of neural signals from the same lead used for stimulation. Many Percept™ PC sensing features were built with PD patients in mind, but these features are potentially useful to refine therapies for many different disease processes. When starting our ongoing epilepsy research study, we found it difficult to find detailed descriptions about these features and have compiled information from multiple sources to understand it as a tool, particularly for use in patients other than those with PD. Here we provide a tutorial for scientists and physicians interested in using Percept™ PC's features and provide examples of how neural time series data is often represented and saved. We address characteristics of the recorded signals and discuss Percept™ PC hardware and software capabilities in data pre-processing, signal filtering, and DBS lead performance. We explain the power spectrum of the data and how it is shaped by the filter response of Percept™ PC as well as the aliasing of the stimulation due to digitally sampling the data. We present Percept™ PC's ability to extract biomarkers that may be used to optimize stimulation therapy. We show how differences in lead type affects noise characteristics of the implanted leads from seven epilepsy patients enrolled in our clinical trial. Percept™ PC has sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, sampling capabilities, and stimulus artifact rejection for neural activity recording. Limitations in sampling rate, potential artifacts during stimulation, and shortening of battery life when monitoring neural activity at home were observed. Despite these limitations, Percept™ PC demonstrates potential as a useful tool for recording neural activity in order to optimize stimulation therapies to personalize treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary T Sanger
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Thomas R Henry
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Michael C Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - David Darrow
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Robert A McGovern
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| | - Theoden I Netoff
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ille N, Nakao Y, Yano S, Taura T, Ebert A, Bornfleth H, Asagi S, Kozawa K, Itabashi I, Sato T, Sakuraba R, Tsuda R, Kakisaka Y, Jin K, Nakasato N. Ongoing EEG artifact correction using blind source separation. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 158:149-158. [PMID: 38219404 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.12.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) for epileptic spike and seizure detection or brain-computer interfaces can be severely hampered by the presence of artifacts. The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate a fast automatic algorithm for ongoing correction of artifacts in continuous EEG recordings, which can be applied offline and online. METHODS The automatic algorithm for ongoing correction of artifacts is based on fast blind source separation. It uses a sliding window technique with overlapping epochs and features in the spatial, temporal and frequency domain to detect and correct ocular, cardiac, muscle and powerline artifacts. RESULTS The approach was validated in an independent evaluation study on publicly available continuous EEG data with 2035 marked artifacts. Validation confirmed that 88% of the artifacts could be removed successfully (ocular: 81%, cardiac: 84%, muscle: 98%, powerline: 100%). It outperformed state-of-the-art algorithms both in terms of artifact reduction rates and computation time. CONCLUSIONS Fast ongoing artifact correction successfully removed a good proportion of artifacts, while preserving most of the EEG signals. SIGNIFICANCE The presented algorithm may be useful for ongoing correction of artifacts, e.g., in online systems for epileptic spike and seizure detection or brain-computer interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Suguru Asagi
- Clinical Physiological Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kanoko Kozawa
- Clinical Physiological Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Izumi Itabashi
- Clinical Physiological Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Clinical Physiological Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Rie Sakuraba
- Clinical Physiological Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Rie Tsuda
- Clinical Physiological Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yosuke Kakisaka
- Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Jin
- Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Nobukazu Nakasato
- Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sellers KK, Cohen JL, Khambhati AN, Fan JM, Lee AM, Chang EF, Krystal AD. Closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 49:163-178. [PMID: 37369777 PMCID: PMC10700557 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-023-01631-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Despite increasing prevalence and huge personal and societal burden, psychiatric diseases still lack treatments which can control symptoms for a large fraction of patients. Increasing insight into the neurobiology underlying these diseases has demonstrated wide-ranging aberrant activity and functioning in multiple brain circuits and networks. Together with varied presentation and symptoms, this makes one-size-fits-all treatment a challenge. There has been a resurgence of interest in the use of neurostimulation as a treatment for psychiatric diseases. Initial studies using continuous open-loop stimulation, in which clinicians adjusted stimulation parameters during patient visits, showed promise but also mixed results. Given the periodic nature and fluctuations of symptoms often observed in psychiatric illnesses, the use of device-driven closed-loop stimulation may provide more effective therapy. The use of a biomarker, which is correlated with specific symptoms, to deliver stimulation only during symptomatic periods allows for the personalized therapy needed for such heterogeneous disorders. Here, we provide the reader with background motivating the use of closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. We review foundational studies of open- and closed-loop neurostimulation for neuropsychiatric indications, focusing on deep brain stimulation, and discuss key considerations when designing and implementing closed-loop neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin K Sellers
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joshua L Cohen
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ankit N Khambhati
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joline M Fan
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - A Moses Lee
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew D Krystal
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abbaspourazad H, Erturk E, Pesaran B, Shanechi MM. Dynamical flexible inference of nonlinear latent factors and structures in neural population activity. Nat Biomed Eng 2024; 8:85-108. [PMID: 38082181 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-023-01106-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Modelling the spatiotemporal dynamics in the activity of neural populations while also enabling their flexible inference is hindered by the complexity and noisiness of neural observations. Here we show that the lower-dimensional nonlinear latent factors and latent structures can be computationally modelled in a manner that allows for flexible inference causally, non-causally and in the presence of missing neural observations. To enable flexible inference, we developed a neural network that separates the model into jointly trained manifold and dynamic latent factors such that nonlinearity is captured through the manifold factors and the dynamics can be modelled in tractable linear form on this nonlinear manifold. We show that the model, which we named 'DFINE' (for 'dynamical flexible inference for nonlinear embeddings') achieves flexible inference in simulations of nonlinear dynamics and across neural datasets representing a diversity of brain regions and behaviours. Compared with earlier neural-network models, DFINE enables flexible inference, better predicts neural activity and behaviour, and better captures the latent neural manifold structure. DFINE may advance the development of neurotechnology and investigations in neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamidreza Abbaspourazad
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eray Erturk
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bijan Pesaran
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience, and Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maryam M Shanechi
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science, Alfred E. Mann Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hoy CW, de Hemptinne C, Wang SS, Harmer CJ, Apps MAJ, Husain M, Starr PA, Little S. Beta and theta oscillations track effort and previous reward in human basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex during decision making. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.12.05.570285. [PMID: 38106063 PMCID: PMC10723308 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.05.570285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Choosing whether to exert effort to obtain rewards is fundamental to human motivated behavior. However, the neural dynamics underlying the evaluation of reward and effort in humans is poorly understood. Here, we investigate this with chronic intracranial recordings from prefrontal cortex (PFC) and basal ganglia (BG; subthalamic nuclei and globus pallidus) in people with Parkinson's disease performing a decision-making task with offers that varied in levels of reward and physical effort required. This revealed dissociable neural signatures of reward and effort, with BG beta (12-20 Hz) oscillations tracking subjective effort on a single trial basis and PFC theta (4-7 Hz) signaling previous trial reward. Stimulation of PFC increased overall acceptance of offers in addition to increasing the impact of reward on choices. This work uncovers oscillatory mechanisms that guide fundamental decisions to exert effort for reward across BG and PFC, as well as supporting a causal role of PFC for such choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin W. Hoy
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Sarah S. Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Mathew A. J. Apps
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Masud Husain
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Philip A. Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bou Assi E, Schindler K, de Bézenac C, Denison T, Desai S, Keller SS, Lemoine É, Rahimi A, Shoaran M, Rummel C. From basic sciences and engineering to epileptology: A translational approach. Epilepsia 2023; 64 Suppl 3:S72-S84. [PMID: 36861368 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Collaborative efforts between basic scientists, engineers, and clinicians are enabling translational epileptology. In this article, we summarize the recent advances presented at the International Conference for Technology and Analysis of Seizures (ICTALS 2022): (1) novel developments of structural magnetic resonance imaging; (2) latest electroencephalography signal-processing applications; (3) big data for the development of clinical tools; (4) the emerging field of hyperdimensional computing; (5) the new generation of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled neuroprostheses; and (6) the use of collaborative platforms to facilitate epilepsy research translation. We highlight the promise of AI reported in recent investigations and the need for multicenter data-sharing initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Bou Assi
- Department of Neuroscience, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Canada
| | - Kaspar Schindler
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Sleep-Wake-Epilepsy-Center, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christophe de Bézenac
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Timothy Denison
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Simon S Keller
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Émile Lemoine
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | | | - Mahsa Shoaran
- Institute of Electrical and Micro Engineering, Neuro-X Institute, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christian Rummel
- Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (SCAN), University Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wilkins KB, Melbourne JA, Akella P, Bronte-Stewart HM. Unraveling the complexities of programming neural adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1310393. [PMID: 38094147 PMCID: PMC10716917 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1310393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past three decades, deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) has been applied in a continuous open loop fashion, unresponsive to changes in a given patient's state or symptoms over the course of a day. Advances in recent neurostimulator technology enable the possibility for closed loop adaptive DBS (aDBS) for PD as a treatment option in the near future in which stimulation adjusts in a demand-based manner. Although aDBS offers great clinical potential for treatment of motor symptoms, it also brings with it the need for better understanding how to implement it in order to maximize its benefits. In this perspective, we outline considerations for programing several key parameters for aDBS based on our experience across several aDBS-capable research neurostimulators. At its core, aDBS hinges on successful identification of relevant biomarkers that can be measured reliably in real-time working in cohesion with a control policy that governs stimulation adaption. However, auxiliary parameters such as the window in which stimulation is allowed to adapt, as well as the rate it changes, can be just as impactful on performance and vary depending on the control policy and patient. A standardize protocol for programming aDBS will be crucial to ensuring its effective application in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin B. Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jillian A. Melbourne
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Pranav Akella
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ochoa JÁ, Gonzalez-Burgos I, Nicolás MJ, Valencia M. Open Hardware Implementation of Real-Time Phase and Amplitude Estimation for Neurophysiologic Signals. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:1350. [PMID: 38135941 PMCID: PMC10740741 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10121350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is a promising concept in the field of DBS that consists of delivering electrical stimulation in response to specific events. Dynamic adaptivity arises when stimulation targets dynamically changing states, which often calls for a reliable and fast causal estimation of the phase and amplitude of the signals. Here, we present an open-hardware implementation that exploits the concepts of resonators and Hilbert filters embedded in an open-hardware platform. To emulate real-world scenarios, we built a hardware setup that included a system to replay and process different types of physiological signals and test the accuracy of the instantaneous phase and amplitude estimates. The results show that the system can provide a precise and reliable estimation of the phase even in the challenging scenario of dealing with high-frequency oscillations (~250 Hz) in real-time. The framework might be adopted in neuromodulation studies to quickly test biomarkers in clinical and preclinical settings, supporting the advancement of aDBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Ángel Ochoa
- Biomedical Engineering Program, Physiological Monitoring and Control Laboratory, CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Avda Pio XII 55, 31080 Pamplona, Spain; (J.Á.O.); (I.G.-B.); (M.J.N.)
- IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, C/Irunlarrea, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Irene Gonzalez-Burgos
- Biomedical Engineering Program, Physiological Monitoring and Control Laboratory, CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Avda Pio XII 55, 31080 Pamplona, Spain; (J.Á.O.); (I.G.-B.); (M.J.N.)
- IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, C/Irunlarrea, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - María Jesús Nicolás
- Biomedical Engineering Program, Physiological Monitoring and Control Laboratory, CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Avda Pio XII 55, 31080 Pamplona, Spain; (J.Á.O.); (I.G.-B.); (M.J.N.)
- IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, C/Irunlarrea, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Miguel Valencia
- Biomedical Engineering Program, Physiological Monitoring and Control Laboratory, CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Avda Pio XII 55, 31080 Pamplona, Spain; (J.Á.O.); (I.G.-B.); (M.J.N.)
- IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, C/Irunlarrea, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
- Institute of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Universidad de Navarra, Campus Universitario, 31009 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sandoval-Pistorius SS, Hacker ML, Waters AC, Wang J, Provenza NR, de Hemptinne C, Johnson KA, Morrison MA, Cernera S. Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: From Mechanisms to Applications. J Neurosci 2023; 43:7575-7586. [PMID: 37940596 PMCID: PMC10634582 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1427-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for various neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders, involving chronic implantation of electrodes into target brain regions for electrical stimulation delivery. Despite its safety and efficacy, DBS remains an underutilized therapy. Advances in the field of DBS, including in technology, mechanistic understanding, and applications have the potential to expand access and use of DBS, while also improving clinical outcomes. Developments in DBS technology, such as MRI compatibility and bidirectional DBS systems capable of sensing neural activity while providing therapeutic stimulation, have enabled advances in our understanding of DBS mechanisms and its application. In this review, we summarize recent work exploring DBS modulation of target networks. We also cover current work focusing on improved programming and the development of novel stimulation paradigms that go beyond current standards of DBS, many of which are enabled by sensing-enabled DBS systems and have the potential to expand access to DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mallory L Hacker
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232
| | - Allison C Waters
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
- Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Coralie de Hemptinne
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Kara A Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32608
| | - Melanie A Morrison
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Milekovic T, Moraud EM, Macellari N, Moerman C, Raschellà F, Sun S, Perich MG, Varescon C, Demesmaeker R, Bruel A, Bole-Feysot LN, Schiavone G, Pirondini E, YunLong C, Hao L, Galvez A, Hernandez-Charpak SD, Dumont G, Ravier J, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Mignardot JB, Carparelli G, Harte C, Hankov N, Aureli V, Watrin A, Lambert H, Borton D, Laurens J, Vollenweider I, Borgognon S, Bourre F, Goillandeau M, Ko WKD, Petit L, Li Q, Buschman R, Buse N, Yaroshinsky M, Ledoux JB, Becce F, Jimenez MC, Bally JF, Denison T, Guehl D, Ijspeert A, Capogrosso M, Squair JW, Asboth L, Starr PA, Wang DD, Lacour SP, Micera S, Qin C, Bloch J, Bezard E, Courtine G. A spinal cord neuroprosthesis for locomotor deficits due to Parkinson's disease. Nat Med 2023; 29:2854-2865. [PMID: 37932548 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02584-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
People with late-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) often suffer from debilitating locomotor deficits that are resistant to currently available therapies. To alleviate these deficits, we developed a neuroprosthesis operating in closed loop that targets the dorsal root entry zones innervating lumbosacral segments to reproduce the natural spatiotemporal activation of the lumbosacral spinal cord during walking. We first developed this neuroprosthesis in a non-human primate model that replicates locomotor deficits due to PD. This neuroprosthesis not only alleviated locomotor deficits but also restored skilled walking in this model. We then implanted the neuroprosthesis in a 62-year-old male with a 30-year history of PD who presented with severe gait impairments and frequent falls that were medically refractory to currently available therapies. We found that the neuroprosthesis interacted synergistically with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and dopaminergic replacement therapies to alleviate asymmetry and promote longer steps, improve balance and reduce freezing of gait. This neuroprosthesis opens new perspectives to reduce the severity of locomotor deficits in people with PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomislav Milekovic
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Fundamental Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Eduardo Martin Moraud
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolo Macellari
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Moerman
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Flavio Raschellà
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- NeuroX Institute, School of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Shiqi Sun
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthew G Perich
- Department of Fundamental Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Camille Varescon
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Robin Demesmaeker
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alice Bruel
- Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Léa N Bole-Feysot
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Schiavone
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces (LSBI), NeuroX Institute, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Elvira Pirondini
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Cheng YunLong
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Li Hao
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Andrea Galvez
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sergio Daniel Hernandez-Charpak
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gregory Dumont
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jimmy Ravier
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Camille G Le Goff-Mignardot
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Baptiste Mignardot
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Gaia Carparelli
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cathal Harte
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Hankov
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Viviana Aureli
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - David Borton
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- School of Engineering, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jean Laurens
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabelle Vollenweider
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Simon Borgognon
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bourre
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Michel Goillandeau
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Wai Kin D Ko
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Laurent Petit
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Qin Li
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China
| | | | | | - Maria Yaroshinsky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jean-Baptiste Ledoux
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fabio Becce
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Julien F Bally
- Department of Neurology, CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Dominique Guehl
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France
| | - Auke Ijspeert
- Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marco Capogrosso
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Rehab and Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jordan W Squair
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Leonie Asboth
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Doris D Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stéphanie P Lacour
- NeuroX Institute, School of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces (LSBI), NeuroX Institute, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Silvestro Micera
- NeuroX Institute, School of Bioengineering, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Biorobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chuan Qin
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jocelyne Bloch
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Erwan Bezard
- Motac Neuroscience, UK-M15 6WE, Manchester, UK.
- China Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France.
- CNRS, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR 5293, Bordeaux, France.
| | - G Courtine
- NeuroX Institute, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
- NeuroRestore, Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies, EPFL/CHUV/UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mivalt F, Kremen V, Sladky V, Cui J, Gregg NM, Balzekas I, Marks V, St Louis EK, Croarkin P, Lundstrom BN, Nelson N, Kim J, Hermes D, Messina S, Worrell S, Richner T, Brinkmann BH, Denison T, Miller KJ, Van Gompel J, Stead M, Worrell GA. Impedance Rhythms in Human Limbic System. J Neurosci 2023; 43:6653-6666. [PMID: 37620157 PMCID: PMC10538585 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0241-23.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The impedance is a fundamental electrical property of brain tissue, playing a crucial role in shaping the characteristics of local field potentials, the extent of ephaptic coupling, and the volume of tissue activated by externally applied electrical brain stimulation. We tracked brain impedance, sleep-wake behavioral state, and epileptiform activity in five people with epilepsy living in their natural environment using an investigational device. The study identified impedance oscillations that span hours to weeks in the amygdala, hippocampus, and anterior nucleus thalamus. The impedance in these limbic brain regions exhibit multiscale cycles with ultradian (∼1.5-1.7 h), circadian (∼21.6-26.4 h), and infradian (∼20-33 d) periods. The ultradian and circadian period cycles are driven by sleep-wake state transitions between wakefulness, nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Limbic brain tissue impedance reaches a minimum value in NREM sleep, intermediate values in REM sleep, and rises through the day during wakefulness, reaching a maximum in the early evening before sleep onset. Infradian (∼20-33 d) impedance cycles were not associated with a distinct behavioral correlate. Brain tissue impedance is known to strongly depend on the extracellular space (ECS) volume, and the findings reported here are consistent with sleep-wake-dependent ECS volume changes recently observed in the rodent cortex related to the brain glymphatic system. We hypothesize that human limbic brain ECS changes during sleep-wake state transitions underlie the observed multiscale impedance cycles. Impedance is a simple electrophysiological biomarker that could prove useful for tracking ECS dynamics in human health, disease, and therapy.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The electrical impedance in limbic brain structures (amygdala, hippocampus, anterior nucleus thalamus) is shown to exhibit oscillations over multiple timescales. We observe that impedance oscillations with ultradian and circadian periodicities are associated with transitions between wakefulness, NREM, and REM sleep states. There are also impedance oscillations spanning multiple weeks that do not have a clear behavioral correlate and whose origin remains unclear. These multiscale impedance oscillations will have an impact on extracellular ionic currents that give rise to local field potentials, ephaptic coupling, and the tissue activated by electrical brain stimulation. The approach for measuring tissue impedance using perturbational electrical currents is an established engineering technique that may be useful for tracking ECS volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Mivalt
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, 61600 Brno, Czech Republic
- International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Vaclav Kremen
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
- Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Vladimir Sladky
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
- International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jie Cui
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Nicholas M Gregg
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Irena Balzekas
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Victoria Marks
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Erik K St Louis
- Center for Sleep Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Medicine, Divisions of Sleep Neurology and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | | | - Brian Nils Lundstrom
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Noelle Nelson
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Jiwon Kim
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Dora Hermes
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Steven Messina
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Samuel Worrell
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Thomas Richner
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Benjamin H Brinkmann
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Timothy Denison
- Department of Engineering Science, Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Kai J Miller
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Jamie Van Gompel
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Matthew Stead
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Gregory A Worrell
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mügge F, Kleinholdermann U, Heun A, Ollenschläger M, Hannink J, Pedrosa DJ. Subthalamic 85 Hz deep brain stimulation improves walking pace and stride length in Parkinson's disease patients. Neurol Res Pract 2023; 5:33. [PMID: 37559161 PMCID: PMC10413698 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-023-00263-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile gait sensors represent a compelling tool to objectify the severity of symptoms in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD), but also to determine the therapeutic benefit of interventions. In particular, parameters of Deep Brain stimulation (DBS) with its short latency could be accurately assessed using sensor data. This study aimed at gaining insight into gait changes due to different DBS parameters in patients with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. METHODS An analysis of various gait examinations was performed on 23 of the initially enrolled 27 iPD patients with chronic STN DBS. Stimulation settings were previously adjusted for either amplitude, frequency, or pulse width in a randomised order. A linear mixed effects model was used to analyse changes in gait speed, stride length, and maximum sensor lift. RESULTS The findings of our study indicate significant improvements in gait speed, stride length, and leg lift measurable with mobile gait sensors under different DBS parameter variations. Notably, we observed positive results at 85 Hz, which proved to be more effective than often applied higher frequencies and that these improvements were traceable across almost all conditions. While pulse widths did produce some improvements in leg lift, they were less well tolerated and had inconsistent effects on some of the gait parameters. Our research suggests that using lower frequencies of DBS may offer a more tolerable and effective approach to enhancing gait in individuals with iPD. CONCLUSIONS Our results advocate for lower stimulation frequencies for patients who report gait difficulties, especially those who can adapt their DBS settings remotely. They also show that mobile gait sensors could be incorporated into clinical practice in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Mügge
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany
| | - U Kleinholdermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany.
| | - A Heun
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Ollenschläger
- Portabiles HealthCare Technologies, Henkestraße 91, 91052, Erlangen, Germany
| | - J Hannink
- Portabiles HealthCare Technologies, Henkestraße 91, 91052, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D J Pedrosa
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany
- Center of Mind, Brain and Behaviour, Philipps University Marburg, Hans-Meerwein- Straße, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Oehrn CR, Cernera S, Hammer LH, Shcherbakova M, Yao J, Hahn A, Wang S, Ostrem JL, Little S, Starr PA. Personalized chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation outperforms conventional stimulation in Parkinson's disease. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.08.03.23293450. [PMID: 37649907 PMCID: PMC10463549 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.03.23293450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation is a widely used therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) but currently lacks dynamic responsiveness to changing clinical and neural states. Feedback control has the potential to improve therapeutic effectiveness, but optimal control strategy and additional benefits of "adaptive" neurostimulation are unclear. We implemented adaptive subthalamic nucleus stimulation, controlled by subthalamic or cortical signals, in three PD patients (five hemispheres) during normal daily life. We identified neurophysiological biomarkers of residual motor fluctuations using data-driven analyses of field potentials over a wide frequency range and varying stimulation amplitudes. Narrowband gamma oscillations (65-70 Hz) at either site emerged as the best control signal for sensing during stimulation. A blinded, randomized trial demonstrated improved motor symptoms and quality of life compared to clinically optimized standard stimulation. Our approach highlights the promise of personalized adaptive neurostimulation based on data-driven selection of control signals and may be applied to other neurological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina R Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Cernera
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren H Hammer
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maria Shcherbakova
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jiaang Yao
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Amelia Hahn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Wang
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jill L Ostrem
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley - University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Neumann WJ, Gilron R, Little S, Tinkhauser G. Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation: From Experimental Evidence Toward Practical Implementation. Mov Disord 2023. [PMID: 37148553 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Closed-loop adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) can deliver individualized therapy at an unprecedented temporal precision for neurological disorders. This has the potential to lead to a breakthrough in neurotechnology, but the translation to clinical practice remains a significant challenge. Via bidirectional implantable brain-computer-interfaces that have become commercially available, aDBS can now sense and selectively modulate pathophysiological brain circuit activity. Pilot studies investigating different aDBS control strategies showed promising results, but the short experimental study designs have not yet supported individualized analyses of patient-specific factors in biomarker and therapeutic response dynamics. Notwithstanding the clear theoretical advantages of a patient-tailored approach, these new stimulation possibilities open a vast and mostly unexplored parameter space, leading to practical hurdles in the implementation and development of clinical trials. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the neurophysiological and neurotechnological aspects related to aDBS is crucial to develop evidence-based treatment regimens for clinical practice. Therapeutic success of aDBS will depend on the integrated development of strategies for feedback signal identification, artifact mitigation, signal processing, and control policy adjustment, for precise stimulation delivery tailored to individual patients. The present review introduces the reader to the neurophysiological foundation of aDBS for Parkinson's disease (PD) and other network disorders, explains currently available aDBS control policies, and highlights practical pitfalls and difficulties to be addressed in the upcoming years. Finally, it highlights the importance of interdisciplinary clinical neurotechnological research within and across DBS centers, toward an individualized patient-centered approach to invasive brain stimulation. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Simon Little
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gerd Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gao Q, Schimdt SL, Chowdhury A, Feng G, Peters JJ, Genty K, Grill WM, Turner DA, Pajic M. Offline Learning of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Controllers for Parkinson Disease Treatment. ARXIV 2023:arXiv:2302.02477v4. [PMID: 36798453 PMCID: PMC9934729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown great promise toward treating motor symptoms caused by Parkinson's disease (PD), by delivering electrical pulses to the Basal Ganglia (BG) region of the brain. However, DBS devices approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can only deliver continuous DBS (cDBS) stimuli at a fixed amplitude; this energy inefficient operation reduces battery lifetime of the device, cannot adapt treatment dynamically for activity, and may cause significant side-effects (e.g., gait impairment). In this work, we introduce an offline reinforcement learning (RL) framework, allowing the use of past clinical data to train an RL policy to adjust the stimulation amplitude in real time, with the goal of reducing energy use while maintaining the same level of treatment (i.e., control) efficacy as cDBS. Moreover, clinical protocols require the safety and performance of such RL controllers to be demonstrated ahead of deployments in patients. Thus, we also introduce an offline policy evaluation (OPE) method to estimate the performance of RL policies using historical data, before deploying them on patients. We evaluated our framework on four PD patients equipped with the RC+S DBS system, employing the RL controllers during monthly clinical visits, with the overall control efficacy evaluated by severity of symptoms (i.e., bradykinesia and tremor), changes in PD biomakers (i.e., local field potentials), and patient ratings. The results from clinical experiments show that our RL-based controller maintains the same level of control efficacy as cDBS, but with significantly reduced stimulation energy. Further, the OPE method is shown effective in accurately estimating and ranking the expected returns of RL controllers.
Collapse
|
29
|
A wearable platform for closed-loop stimulation and recording of single-neuron and local field potential activity in freely moving humans. Nat Neurosci 2023; 26:517-527. [PMID: 36804647 PMCID: PMC9991917 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-023-01260-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Advances in technologies that can record and stimulate deep brain activity in humans have led to impactful discoveries within the field of neuroscience and contributed to the development of novel therapies for neurological and psychiatric disorders. Further progress, however, has been hindered by device limitations in that recording of single-neuron activity during freely moving behaviors in humans has not been possible. Additionally, implantable neurostimulation devices, currently approved for human use, have limited stimulation programmability and restricted full-duplex bidirectional capability. In this study, we developed a wearable bidirectional closed-loop neuromodulation system (Neuro-stack) and used it to record single-neuron and local field potential activity during stationary and ambulatory behavior in humans. Together with a highly flexible and customizable stimulation capability, the Neuro-stack provides an opportunity to investigate the neurophysiological basis of disease, develop improved responsive neuromodulation therapies, explore brain function during naturalistic behaviors in humans and, consequently, bridge decades of neuroscientific findings across species.
Collapse
|
30
|
An Q, Yin Z, Ma R, Fan H, Xu Y, Gan Y, Gao Y, Meng F, Yang A, Jiang Y, Zhu G, Zhang J. Adaptive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: looking back at the past decade on motor outcomes. J Neurol 2023; 270:1371-1387. [PMID: 36471098 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11495-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) has been reported to be an effective treatment for motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it remains unclear whether and in which motor domain aDBS provides greater/less benefits than conventional DBS (cDBS). OBJECTIVE To conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review to explore the improvement of the motor symptoms of PD patients undergoing aDBS and the comparison between aDBS and cDBS. METHODS Nineteen studies from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database were eligible for the main analysis. Twelve studies used quantitative plus qualitative analysis; seven studies were only qualitatively analyzed. The efficacy of aDBS was evaluated and compared to cDBS through overall motor function improvements, changes in symptoms of rigidity-bradykinesia, dyskinesia, tremor, and speech function, and total electrical energy delivered (TEED). The overall motor improvement and TEED were investigated through meta-analyses, while other variables were investigated by systematic review. RESULTS Quantitative analysis showed that aDBS, with a reduction of TEED (55% of that of cDBS), significantly improved motor functions (33.9%, p < 0.01) and may be superior to cDBS in overall motor improvement (p = 0.002). However, significant publication bias was detected regarding the superiority (p = 0.006, Egger's test). In the qualitative analysis, rigidity-bradykinesia, dyskinesia, and speech function outcomes after aDBS and cDBS were comparable. Beta-based aDBS may not be as efficient as cDBS for tremor control. CONCLUSIONS aDBS can effectively relieve the clinical symptoms of advanced PD as did cDBS, at least in acute trials, delivering less stimulation than cDBS. Specific symptoms including tremor and axial disability remain to be compared between aDBS and cDBS in long-term studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi An
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Zixiao Yin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Ruoyu Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Houyou Fan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Yichen Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Yifei Gan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Fangang Meng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China.,Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Anchao Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Yin Jiang
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China
| | - Guanyu Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China.
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China. .,Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, No. 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Fengtai District, 100070, Beijing, China. .,Beijing Key Laboratory of Neurostimulation, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kouhalvandi L, Matekovits L, Peter I. Amplifiers in Biomedical Engineering: A Review from Application Perspectives. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:2277. [PMID: 36850873 PMCID: PMC9961860 DOI: 10.3390/s23042277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Continuous monitoring and treatment of various diseases with biomedical technologies and wearable electronics has become significantly important. The healthcare area is an important, evolving field that, among other things, requires electronic and micro-electromechanical technologies. Designed circuits and smart devices can lead to reduced hospitalization time and hospitals equipped with high-quality equipment. Some of these devices can also be implanted inside the body. Recently, various implanted electronic devices for monitoring and diagnosing diseases have been presented. These instruments require communication links through wireless technologies. In the transmitters of these devices, power amplifiers are the most important components and their performance plays important roles. This paper is devoted to collecting and providing a comprehensive review on the various designed implanted amplifiers for advanced biomedical applications. The reported amplifiers vary with respect to the class/type of amplifier, implemented CMOS technology, frequency band, output power, and the overall efficiency of the designs. The purpose of the authors is to provide a general view of the available solutions, and any researcher can obtain suitable circuit designs that can be selected for their problem by reading this survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lida Kouhalvandi
- Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Dogus University, Istanbul 34775, Turkey
| | - Ladislau Matekovits
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
- Department of Measurements and Optical Electronics, Politehnica University Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania
- Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell’Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni, National Research Council, 10129 Turin, Italy
| | - Ildiko Peter
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology “George Emil Palade”, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kleinholdermann U, Bacara B, Timmermann L, Pedrosa DJ. Prediction of Movement Ratings and Deep Brain Stimulation Parameters in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:356-363. [PMID: 36396526 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) parameter fine-tuning after lead implantation is laborious work because of the almost uncountable possible combinations. Patients and practitioners often gain the perception that assistive devices could be beneficial for adjusting settings effectively. OBJECTIVE We aimed at a proof-of-principle study to assess the benefits of noninvasive movement recordings as a means to predict best DBS settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS For this study, 32 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, under chronic subthalamic nucleus stimulation with directional leads, were recorded. During monopolar review, each available contact was activated with currents between 0.5 and 5 mA, and diadochokinesia, rigidity, and tapping ability were rated clinically. Moreover, participants' movements were measured during four simple hand movement tasks while wearing a commercially available armband carrying an inertial measurement unit (IMU). We trained random forest models to learn the relations between clinical ratings, electrode settings, and movement features obtained from the IMU. RESULTS Firstly, we could show that clinical mobility ratings can be predicted from IMU features with correlations of up to r = 0.68 between true and predicted values. Secondly, these features also enabled a prediction of DBS parameters, which showed correlations of up to approximately r = 0.8 with clinically optimal DBS settings and were associated with congruent volumes of tissue activated. CONCLUSION Movement recordings from customer-grade mobile IMU carrying devices are promising candidates, not only for remote symptom assessment but also for closed-loop DBS parameter adjustment, and could thus extend the list of available aids for effective programming beyond imaging techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urs Kleinholdermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg and Gießen, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bugrahan Bacara
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg and Gießen, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany
| | - Lars Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg and Gießen, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany; Center of Mind, Brain and Behaviour, Philipps University Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Straße, Marburg, Germany
| | - David J Pedrosa
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg and Gießen, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany; Center of Mind, Brain and Behaviour, Philipps University Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Straße, Marburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Stam MJ, van Wijk BCM, Sharma P, Beudel M, Piña-Fuentes DA, de Bie RMA, Schuurman PR, Neumann WJ, Buijink AWG. A comparison of methods to suppress electrocardiographic artifacts in local field potential recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 146:147-161. [PMID: 36543611 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Local field potential (LFP) recordings from deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes are often contaminated with electrocardiographic (ECG) artifacts that hinder the detection of disease-specific electrical brain activity. METHODS Three ECG suppression methods were evaluated: (1) QRS interpolation of the Perceive toolbox, (2) template subtraction, and (3) singular value decomposition (SVD). LFPs were recorded with the Medtronic PerceptTM PC system in nine Parkinson's disease patients with stimulation OFF ("OFF-DBS"; anode disconnected) and ON at 0 mA ("ON-DBS 0 mA"; anode connected). Findings were verified with simulated ECG-contaminated time series. RESULTS ECG artifacts were present in 10 out of 18 ON-DBS 0 mA recordings. All ECG suppression methods drastically reduced artifact-induced beta band (13-35 Hz) power and at least partly recovered the beta peak and beta burst dynamics. Using external ECG recordings and lengthening artifact epoch length improved the performance of the suppression methods. Increasing epoch length, however, elevated the risk of flattening the beta peak and losing beta burst dynamics. CONCLUSIONS The SVD method formed the preferred trade-off between artifact cleaning and signal loss, as long as its parameter settings are adequately chosen. SIGNIFICANCE ECG suppression methods enable analysis of disease-specific neural activity from signals affected by ECG artifacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Stam
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B C M van Wijk
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Sharma
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - M Beudel
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D A Piña-Fuentes
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M A de Bie
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P R Schuurman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W-J Neumann
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A W G Buijink
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tiruvadi V, James S, Howell B, Obatusin M, Crowell A, Riva-Posse P, Gross RE, McIntyre CC, Mayberg HS, Butera R. Mitigating Mismatch Compression in Differential Local Field Potentials. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2023; 31:68-77. [PMID: 36288215 PMCID: PMC10784110 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2022.3217469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices capable of measuring differential local field potentials ( ∂ LFP) enable neural recordings alongside clinical therapy. Efforts to identify oscillatory correlates of various brain disorders, or disease readouts, are growing but must proceed carefully to ensure readouts are not distorted by brain environment. In this report we identified, characterized, and mitigated a major source of distortion in ∂ LFP that we introduce as mismatch compression (MC). Using in vivo, in silico, and in vitro models of MC, we showed that impedance mismatches in the two recording electrodes can yield incomplete rejection of stimulation artifact and subsequent gain compression that distorts oscillatory power. We then developed and validated an opensource mitigation pipeline that mitigates the distortions arising from MC. This work enables more reliable oscillatory readouts for adaptive DBS applications.
Collapse
|
35
|
Martinez S, Veirano F, Constandinou TG, Silveira F. Trends in volumetric-energy efficiency of implantable neurostimulators: a review from a circuits and systems perspective. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS 2022; PP:2-20. [PMID: 37015536 DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2022.3228895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art, commercially available neurostimulators. We analyse key design parameters and performance metrics of 45 implantable medical devices across six neural target categories: deep brain, vagus nerve, spinal cord, phrenic nerve, sacral nerve and hypoglossal nerve. We then benchmark these alongside modern cardiac pacemaker devices that represent a more established market. This work studies trends in device size, electrode number, battery technology (i.e., primary and secondary use and chemistry), power consumption and longevity. This information is analysed to show the course of design decisions adopted by industry and identifying opportunity for further innovation. We identify fundamental limits in power consumption, longevity and size as well as the interdependencies and trade-offs. We propose a figure of merit to quantify volumetric efficiency within specific therapeutic targets, battery technologies/capacities, charging capabilities and electrode count. Finally, we compare commercially available implantable medical devices with recently developed systems in the research community. We envisage this analysis to aid circuit and system designers in system optimisation and identifying innovation opportunities, particularly those related to low power circuit design techniques.
Collapse
|
36
|
Löscher W, Worrell GA. Novel subscalp and intracranial devices to wirelessly record and analyze continuous EEG in unsedated, behaving dogs in their natural environments: A new paradigm in canine epilepsy research. Front Vet Sci 2022; 9:1014269. [PMID: 36337210 PMCID: PMC9631025 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1014269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Epilepsy is characterized by unprovoked, recurrent seizures and is a common neurologic disorder in dogs and humans. Roughly 1/3 of canines and humans with epilepsy prove to be drug-resistant and continue to have sporadic seizures despite taking daily anti-seizure medications. The optimization of pharmacologic therapy is often limited by inaccurate seizure diaries and medication side effects. Electroencephalography (EEG) has long been a cornerstone of diagnosis and classification in human epilepsy, but because of several technical challenges has played a smaller clinical role in canine epilepsy. The interictal (between seizures) and ictal (seizure) EEG recorded from the epileptic mammalian brain shows characteristic electrophysiologic biomarkers that are very useful for clinical management. A fundamental engineering gap for both humans and canines with epilepsy has been the challenge of obtaining continuous long-term EEG in the patients' natural environment. We are now on the cusp of a revolution where continuous long-term EEG from behaving canines and humans will be available to guide clinicians in the diagnosis and optimal treatment of their patients. Here we review some of the devices that have recently emerged for obtaining long-term EEG in ambulatory subjects living in their natural environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Löscher
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hanover, Germany
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Hanover, Germany
- *Correspondence: Wolfgang Löscher
| | - Gregory A. Worrell
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alarie ME, Provenza NR, Avendano-Ortega M, McKay SA, Waite AS, Mathura RK, Herron JA, Sheth SA, Borton DA, Goodman WK. Artifact characterization and mitigation techniques during concurrent sensing and stimulation using bidirectional deep brain stimulation platforms. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:1016379. [PMID: 36337849 PMCID: PMC9626519 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1016379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Bidirectional deep brain stimulation (DBS) platforms have enabled a surge in hours of recordings in naturalistic environments, allowing further insight into neurological and psychiatric disease states. However, high amplitude, high frequency stimulation generates artifacts that contaminate neural signals and hinder our ability to interpret the data. This is especially true in psychiatric disorders, for which high amplitude stimulation is commonly applied to deep brain structures where the native neural activity is miniscule in comparison. Here, we characterized artifact sources in recordings from a bidirectional DBS platform, the Medtronic Summit RC + S, with the goal of optimizing recording configurations to improve signal to noise ratio (SNR). Data were collected from three subjects in a clinical trial of DBS for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Stimulation was provided bilaterally to the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) using two independent implantable neurostimulators. We first manipulated DBS amplitude within safe limits (2–5.3 mA) to characterize the impact of stimulation artifacts on neural recordings. We found that high amplitude stimulation produces slew overflow, defined as exceeding the rate of change that the analog to digital converter can accurately measure. Overflow led to expanded spectral distortion of the stimulation artifact, with a six fold increase in the bandwidth of the 150.6 Hz stimulation artifact from 147–153 to 140–180 Hz. By increasing sense blank values during high amplitude stimulation, we reduced overflow by as much as 30% and improved artifact distortion, reducing the bandwidth from 140–180 Hz artifact to 147–153 Hz. We also identified artifacts that shifted in frequency through modulation of telemetry parameters. We found that telemetry ratio changes led to predictable shifts in the center-frequencies of the associated artifacts, allowing us to proactively shift the artifacts outside of our frequency range of interest. Overall, the artifact characterization methods and results described here enable increased data interpretability and unconstrained biomarker exploration using data collected from bidirectional DBS devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicole R. Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michelle Avendano-Ortega
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sarah A. McKay
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ayan S. Waite
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Raissa K. Mathura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jeffrey A. Herron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sameer A. Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David A. Borton
- Brown University School of Engineering, Providence, RI, United States
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Wayne K. Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Wayne K. Goodman,
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stanslaski S, Farooqi H, Sanabria DE, Netoff TI. Fully Closed Loop Test Environment for Adaptive Implantable Neural Stimulators Using Computational Models. J Med Device 2022; 16:034501. [PMID: 35646224 PMCID: PMC9125865 DOI: 10.1115/1.4054083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Implantable brain stimulation devices continue to be developed to treat and monitor brain conditions. As the complexity of these devices grows to include adaptive neuromodulation therapy, validating the operation and verifying the correctness of these systems becomes more complicated. The new complexities lie in the functioning of the device being dependent on the interaction with the patient and environmental factors such as noise and artifacts. Here, we present a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing framework that employs computational models of pathological neural dynamics to test adaptive deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices prior to animal or human testing. A brain stimulation and recording electrode array is placed in the saline tank and connected to an adaptive neuromodulation system that measures and processes the synthetic signals and delivers stimulation back into the saline tank. A data acquisition system is used to detect the stimulation and provide feedback to the computational model in order to simulate the effects of stimulation on the neural dynamics. In this study, we used real-time computational models to emulate the dynamics of epileptic seizures observed in the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) in epilepsy patients and beta band (11-35 Hz) oscillations observed in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. These models simulated neuronal responses to electrical stimulation pulses and the saline tank tested hardware interactions between the detection algorithms and stimulation interference. We tested and validated the operation of adaptive DBS algorithms for seizure and beta band power suppression embedded in an implantable DBS system (Medtronic Summit RC+S). This study highlights the utility of the proposed hardware-in-the-loop framework to systematically test the adaptive DBS systems in the presence of system aggressors such as environmental noise and stimulation-induced electrical artifacts. This testing procedure can help ensure correctness and robustness of adaptive DBS devices prior to animal and human testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Stanslaski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; Neuromodulation Department, Medtronic PLC, Minneapolis, MN 55432
| | - Hafsa Farooqi
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | | | - Theoden Ivan Netoff
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yang Y, Truong ND, Eshraghian JK, Nikpour A, Kavehei O. Weak self-supervised learning for seizure forecasting: a feasibility study. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2022; 9:220374. [PMID: 35950196 PMCID: PMC9346358 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
This paper proposes an artificial intelligence system that continuously improves over time at event prediction using initially unlabelled data by using self-supervised learning. Time-series data are inherently autocorrelated. By using a detection model to generate weak labels on the fly, which are concurrently used as targets to train a prediction model on a time-shifted input data stream, this autocorrelation can effectively be harnessed to reduce the burden of manual labelling. This is critical in medical patient monitoring, as it enables the development of personalized forecasting models without demanding the annotation of long sequences of physiological signal recordings. We perform a feasibility study on seizure prediction, which is identified as an ideal test case, as pre-ictal brainwaves are patient-specific, and tailoring models to individual patients is known to improve forecasting performance significantly. Our self-supervised approach is used to train individualized forecasting models for 10 patients, showing an average relative improvement in sensitivity by 14.30% and a reduction in false alarms by 19.61% in early seizure forecasting. This proof-of-concept on the feasibility of using a continuous stream of time-series neurophysiological data paves the way towards a low-power neuromorphic neuromodulation system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yikai Yang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, and the Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative BioEngineering, Faculty of EngineeringThe University of Sydney Nano Institute, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Nhan Duy Truong
- School of Biomedical Engineering, and the Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative BioEngineering, Faculty of EngineeringThe University of Sydney Nano Institute, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
- The University of Sydney Nano Institute, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Jason K. Eshraghian
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Service and Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
| | - Omid Kavehei
- School of Biomedical Engineering, and the Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovative BioEngineering, Faculty of EngineeringThe University of Sydney Nano Institute, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
- The University of Sydney Nano Institute, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dastin-van Rijn EM, Provenza NR, Vogt GS, Avendano-Ortega M, Sheth SA, Goodman WK, Harrison MT, Borton DA. PELP: Accounting for Missing Data in Neural Time Series by Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:934063. [PMID: 35874161 PMCID: PMC9301255 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.934063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in wireless data transmission technology have the potential to revolutionize clinical neuroscience. Today sensing-capable electrical stimulators, known as "bidirectional devices", are used to acquire chronic brain activity from humans in natural environments. However, with wireless transmission come potential failures in data transmission, and not all available devices correctly account for missing data or provide precise timing for when data losses occur. Our inability to precisely reconstruct time-domain neural signals makes it difficult to apply subsequent neural signal processing techniques and analyses. Here, our goal was to accurately reconstruct time-domain neural signals impacted by data loss during wireless transmission. Towards this end, we developed a method termed Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets (PELP). PELP leverages the highly periodic nature of stimulation artifacts to precisely determine when data losses occur. Using simulated stimulation waveforms added to human EEG data, we show that PELP is robust to a range of stimulation waveforms and noise characteristics. Then, we applied PELP to local field potential (LFP) recordings collected using an implantable, bidirectional DBS platform operating at various telemetry bandwidths. By effectively accounting for the timing of missing data, PELP enables the analysis of neural time series data collected via wireless transmission-a prerequisite for better understanding the brain-behavior relationships underlying neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Dastin-van Rijn
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gregory S Vogt
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Michelle Avendano-Ortega
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Matthew T Harrison
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - David A Borton
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Slavin KV. Commentary: Initial Clinical Outcome With Bilateral, Dual Target Deep Brain Stimulation Trial in Parkinson Disease Using Summit RC + S. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:e61-e62. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
42
|
Fang H, Yang Y. Designing and Validating a Robust Adaptive Neuromodulation Algorithm for Closed-Loop Control of Brain States. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35576912 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac7005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neuromodulation systems that use closed-loop brain stimulation to control brain states can provide new therapies for brain disorders. To date, closed-loop brain stimulation has largely used linear time-invariant controllers. However, nonlinear time-varying brain network dynamics and external disturbances can appear during real-time stimulation, collectively leading to real-time model uncertainty. Real-time model uncertainty can degrade the performance or even cause instability of time-invariant controllers. Three problems need to be resolved to enable accurate and stable control under model uncertainty. First, an adaptive controller is needed to track the model uncertainty. Second, the adaptive controller additionally needs to be robust to noise and disturbances. Third, theoretical analyses of stability and robustness are needed as prerequisites for stable operation of the controller in practical applications. APPROACH We develop a robust adaptive neuromodulation algorithm that solves the above three problems. First, we develop a state-space brain network model that explicitly includes nonlinear terms of real-time model uncertainty and design an adaptive controller to track and cancel the model uncertainty. Second, to improve the robustness of the adaptive controller, we design two linear filters to increase steady-state control accuracy and reduce sensitivity to high-frequency noise and disturbances. Third, we conduct theoretical analyses to prove the stability of the neuromodulation algorithm and establish a trade-off between stability and robustness, which we further use to optimize the algorithm design. Finally, we validate the algorithm using comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations that span a broad range of model nonlinearity, uncertainty, and complexity. MAIN RESULTS The robust adaptive neuromodulation algorithm accurately tracks various types of target brain state trajectories, enables stable and robust control, and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art neuromodulation algorithms. SIGNIFICANCE Our algorithm has implications for future designs of precise, stable, and robust closed-loop brain stimulation systems to treat brain disorders and facilitate brain functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Fang
- University of Central Florida, Research 1 Room 334, 313/316, University of Central Florida, 4353 Scorpius St., Orlando, Florida, 32816-2368, UNITED STATES
| | - Yuxiao Yang
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Central Florida, 4353 Scorpius St., Orlando, Florida, 32816-2368, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zamora M, Toth R, Morgante F, Ottaway J, Gillbe T, Martin S, Lamb G, Noone T, Benjaber M, Nairac Z, Sehgal D, Constandinou TG, Herron J, Aziz TZ, Gillbe I, Green AL, Pereira EAC, Denison T. DyNeuMo Mk-1: Design and pilot validation of an investigational motion-adaptive neurostimulator with integrated chronotherapy. Exp Neurol 2022; 351:113977. [PMID: 35016994 PMCID: PMC7612891 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
There is growing interest in using adaptive neuromodulation to provide a more personalized therapy experience that might improve patient outcomes. Current implant technology, however, can be limited in its adaptive algorithm capability. To enable exploration of adaptive algorithms with chronic implants, we designed and validated the 'Picostim DyNeuMo Mk-1' (DyNeuMo Mk-1 for short), a fully-implantable, adaptive research stimulator that titrates stimulation based on circadian rhythms (e.g. sleep, wake) and the patient's movement state (e.g. posture, activity, shock, free-fall). The design leverages off-the-shelf consumer technology that provides inertial sensing with low-power, high reliability, and relatively modest cost. The DyNeuMo Mk-1 system was designed, manufactured and verified using ISO 13485 design controls, including ISO 14971 risk management techniques to ensure patient safety, while enabling novel algorithms. The system was validated for an intended use case in movement disorders under an emergency-device authorization from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The algorithm configurability and expanded stimulation parameter space allows for a number of applications to be explored in both central and peripheral applications. Intended applications include adaptive stimulation for movement disorders, synchronizing stimulation with circadian patterns, and reacting to transient inertial events such as posture changes, general activity, and walking. With appropriate design controls in place, first-in-human research trials are now being prepared to explore the utility of automated motion-adaptive algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayela Zamora
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Robert Toth
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca Morgante
- Neurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosurgery, Atkinson Morley Regional Neurosciences Centre, St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tom Gillbe
- Bioinduction Ltd., Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sean Martin
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Guy Lamb
- Bioinduction Ltd., Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Tara Noone
- Bioinduction Ltd., Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Moaad Benjaber
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Zachary Nairac
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Devang Sehgal
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy G Constandinou
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Care Research and Technology Centre, UK Dementia Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeffrey Herron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tipu Z Aziz
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexander L Green
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Erlick A C Pereira
- Neurosciences Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurosurgery, Atkinson Morley Regional Neurosciences Centre, St George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Denison
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Toward therapeutic electrophysiology: beta-band suppression as a biomarker in chronic local field potential recordings. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2022; 8:44. [PMID: 35440571 PMCID: PMC9018912 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-022-00301-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is a promising concept for feedback-based neurostimulation, with the potential of clinical implementation with the sensing-enabled Percept neurostimulator. We aim to characterize chronic electrophysiological activity during stimulation and to validate beta-band activity as a biomarker for bradykinesia. Subthalamic activity was recorded during stepwise stimulation amplitude increase OFF medication in 10 Parkinson's patients during rest and finger tapping. Offline analysis of wavelet-transformed beta-band activity and assessment of inter-variable relationships in linear mixed effects models were implemented. There was a stepwise suppression of low-beta activity with increasing stimulation intensity (p = 0.002). Low-beta power was negatively correlated with movement speed and predictive for velocity improvements (p < 0.001), stimulation amplitude for beta suppression (p < 0.001). Here, we characterize beta-band modulation as a chronic biomarker for motor performance. Our investigations support the use of electrophysiology in therapy optimization, providing evidence for the use of biomarker analysis for clinical aDBS.
Collapse
|
45
|
Ansó J, Benjaber M, Parks B, Parker S, Oehrn CR, Petrucci M, Gilron R, Little S, Wilt R, Bronte-Stewart H, Gunduz A, Borton D, Starr PA, Denison T. Concurrent stimulation and sensing in bi-directional brain interfaces: a multi-site translational experience. J Neural Eng 2022; 19:10.1088/1741-2552/ac59a3. [PMID: 35234664 PMCID: PMC9095704 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac59a3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To provide a design analysis and guidance framework for the implementation of concurrent stimulation and sensing during adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) with particular emphasis on artifact mitigations.Approach. We defined a general architecture of feedback-enabled devices, identified key components in the signal chain which might result in unwanted artifacts and proposed methods that might ultimately enable improved aDBS therapies. We gathered data from research subjects chronically-implanted with an investigational aDBS system, Summit RC + S, to characterize and explore artifact mitigations arising from concurrent stimulation and sensing. We then used a prototype investigational implantable device, DyNeuMo, and a bench-setup that accounts for tissue-electrode properties, to confirm our observations and verify mitigations. The strategies to reduce transient stimulation artifacts and improve performance during aDBS were confirmed in a chronic implant using updated configuration settings.Main results.We derived and validated a 'checklist' of configuration settings to improve system performance and areas for future device improvement. Key considerations for the configuration include (a) active instead of passive recharge, (b) sense-channel blanking in the amplifier, (c) high-pass filter settings, (d) tissue-electrode impedance mismatch management, (e) time-frequency trade-offs in the classifier, (f) algorithm blanking and transition rate limits. Without proper channel configuration, the aDBS algorithm was susceptible to limit-cycles of oscillating stimulation independent of physiological state. By applying the checklist, we could optimize each block's performance characteristics within the overall system. With system-level optimization, a 'fast' aDBS prototype algorithm was demonstrated to be feasible without reentrant loops, and with noise performance suitable for subcortical brain circuits.Significance. We present a framework to study sources and propose mitigations of artifacts in devices that provide chronic aDBS. This work highlights the trade-offs in performance as novel sensing devices translate to the clinic. Finding the appropriate balance of constraints is imperative for successful translation of aDBS therapies.Clinical trial:Institutional Review Board and Investigational Device Exemption numbers: NCT02649166/IRB201501021 (University of Florida), NCT04043403/IRB52548 (Stanford University), NCT03582891/IRB1824454 (University of California San Francisco). IDE #180 097.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ansó
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
- Shared first author
| | - Moaad Benjaber
- MRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Shared first author
| | - Brandon Parks
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
- Shared first author
| | - Samuel Parker
- School of Engineering and Carney Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Carina Renate Oehrn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Matthew Petrucci
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Ro’ee Gilron
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Simon Little
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Robert Wilt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Helen Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America
| | - David Borton
- School of Engineering and Carney Institute, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
- Shared senior author
| | - Timothy Denison
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Shared senior author
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fleming JE, Kremen V, Gilron R, Gregg NM, Zamora M, Dijk DJ, Starr PA, Worrell GA, Little S, Denison TJ. Embedding Digital Chronotherapy into Bioelectronic Medicines. iScience 2022; 25:104028. [PMID: 35313697 PMCID: PMC8933700 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
47
|
Tiruvadi V, Choi KS, Gross RE, Butera R, Jirsa V, Mayberg H. Dynamic Oscillations Evoked by Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:768355. [PMID: 35281513 PMCID: PMC8905359 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.768355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of subcallosal cingulate white matter (SCCwm) alleviates symptoms of depression, but its mechanistic effects on brain dynamics remain unclear. In this study we used novel intracranial recordings (LFP) in n = 6 depressed patients stimulated with DBS around the SCCwm target, observing a novel dynamic oscillation (DOs). We confirm that DOs in the LFP are of neural origin and consistently evoked within certain patients. We then characterize the frequency and dynamics of DOs, observing significant variability in DO behavior across patients. Under the hypothesis that LFP-DOs reflect network engagement, we characterize the white matter tracts associated with LFP-DO observations and report a preliminary observation of DO-like activity measured in a single patient's electroencephalography (dEEG). These results support further study of DOs as an objective signal for mechanistic study and connectomics guided DBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vineet Tiruvadi
- Emory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Robert E. Gross
- Emory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Robert Butera
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Tech and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Viktor Jirsa
- Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Helen Mayberg
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mivalt F, Kremen V, Sladky V, Balzekas I, Nejedly P, Gregg N, Lundstrom B, Lepkova K, Pridalova T, Brinkmann BH, Jurak P, Van Gompel JJ, Miller K, Denison T, Louis ES, Worrell GA. Electrical brain stimulation and continuous behavioral state tracking in ambulatory humans. J Neural Eng 2022; 19:10.1088/1741-2552/ac4bfd. [PMID: 35038687 PMCID: PMC9070680 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac4bfd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Electrical deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Sleep disorders are common in people with epilepsy, and DBS may actually further disturb normal sleep patterns and sleep quality. Novel implantable devices capable of DBS and streaming of continuous intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) signals enable detailed assessments of therapy efficacy and tracking of sleep related comorbidities. Here, we investigate the feasibility of automated sleep classification using continuous iEEG data recorded from Papez's circuit in four patients with drug resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy using an investigational implantable sensing and stimulation device with electrodes implanted in bilateral hippocampus (HPC) and anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT).Approach.The iEEG recorded from HPC is used to classify sleep during concurrent DBS targeting ANT. Simultaneous polysomnography (PSG) and sensing from HPC were used to train, validate and test an automated classifier for a range of ANT DBS frequencies: no stimulation, 2 Hz, 7 Hz, and high frequency (>100 Hz).Main results.We show that it is possible to build a patient specific automated sleep staging classifier using power in band features extracted from one HPC iEEG sensing channel. The patient specific classifiers performed well under all thalamic DBS frequencies with an average F1-score 0.894, and provided viable classification into awake and major sleep categories, rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM. We retrospectively analyzed classification performance with gold-standard PSG annotations, and then prospectively deployed the classifier on chronic continuous iEEG data spanning multiple months to characterize sleep patterns in ambulatory patients living in their home environment.Significance.The ability to continuously track behavioral state and fully characterize sleep should prove useful for optimizing DBS for epilepsy and associated sleep, cognitive and mood comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Mivalt
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia
| | - Vaclav Kremen
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Vladimir Sladky
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
- International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Irena Balzekas
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Mayo Clinic School of Medicine and the Mayo Clinic Medical Scientist Training Program, Rochester, MN, USA
- Biomedical Engineering and Physiology Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Petr Nejedly
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Nick Gregg
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brian Lundstrom
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kamila Lepkova
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Tereza Pridalova
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia
- International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne’s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Benjamin H. Brinkmann
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Pavel Jurak
- The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Kai Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Timothy Denison
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Erik St Louis
- Center for Sleep Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Medicine, Divisions of Sleep Neurology & Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gregory A. Worrell
- Bioelectronics Neurophysiology and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zhang Z, Savolainen OW, Constandinou T. Algorithm and hardware considerations for real-time neural signal on-implant processing. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35130536 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac5268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective Various on-workstation neural-spike-based brain machine interface(BMI) systems have reached the point of in-human trials, but on-node and on-implant BMI systems are still under exploration. Such systems are constrained by the area and battery. Researchers should consider the algorithm complexity, available resources, power budgets, CMOS technologies, and the choice of platforms when designing BMI systems. However, the effect of these factors is currently still unclear. Approaches. Here we have proposed a novel real-time 128 channel spike detection algorithm and optimised it on Microcontroller(MCU) and Field Programmable Gate Array(FPGA) platforms towards consuming minimal power and memory/resources. It is presented as a use case to explore the different considerations in system design. Main results. The proposed spike detection algorithm achieved over 97% sensitivity and a smaller than 3% false detection rate. The MCU implementation occupies less than 3KB RAM and consumes 31.5μW/ch. The FPGA platform only occupies 299 logic cells and 3KB RAM for 128 channels and consumes 0.04μW/ch. Significance. On the spike detection algorithm front, we have eliminated the processing bottleneck by reducing the dynamic power consumption to lower than the hardware static power, without sacrificing detection performance. More importantly, we have explored the considerations in algorithm and hardware design with respect to scalability, portability, and costs. These findings can facilitate and guide the future development of real-time on-implant neural signal processing platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Zhang
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - Oscar W Savolainen
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, London, SW7 2AZ, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - Timothy Constandinou
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, London, SW7 2AZ, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Arlotti M, Colombo M, Bonfanti A, Mandat T, Lanotte MM, Pirola E, Borellini L, Rampini P, Eleopra R, Rinaldo S, Romito L, Janssen MLF, Priori A, Marceglia S. A New Implantable Closed-Loop Clinical Neural Interface: First Application in Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:763235. [PMID: 34949982 PMCID: PMC8689059 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.763235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for the treatment of movement disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, and has shown clinical benefits in other brain disorders. A natural path for the improvement of this technique is to continuously observe the stimulation effects on patient symptoms and neurophysiological markers. This requires the evolution of conventional deep brain stimulators to bidirectional interfaces, able to record, process, store, and wirelessly communicate neural signals in a robust and reliable fashion. Here, we present the architecture, design, and first use of an implantable stimulation and sensing interface (AlphaDBSR System) characterized by artifact-free recording and distributed data management protocols. Its application in three patients with Parkinson’s disease (clinical trial n. NCT04681534) is shown as a proof of functioning of a clinically viable implanted brain-computer interface (BCI) for adaptive DBS. Reliable artifact free-recordings, and chronic long-term data and neural signal management are in place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrea Bonfanti
- Newronika SpA, Milan, Italy.,Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tomasz Mandat
- Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michele Maria Lanotte
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.,AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Pirola
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Linda Borellini
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Rampini
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Eleopra
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Rinaldo
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Romito
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcus L F Janssen
- Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Alberto Priori
- Department of Health Sciences, Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Marceglia
- Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Architettura, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|