The perioperative surgical home (PSH): a comprehensive review of US and non-US studies shows predominantly positive quality and cost outcomes

Clinician perspectives on the perioperative roles and responsibilities of anesthesia, surgery, and primary care

BACKGROUND

Although high-risk older patients benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to perioperative care, the specific roles and responsibilities of the clinicians involved have yet to be adequately characterized.

METHODS

Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with four anesthesia preoperative clinic providers, seven surgeons, and nine primary care providers in northern New England.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed both distinct and overlapping roles and responsibilities. Anesthesia providers were described as a "safety net" and surgeons as "captain of the ship", in charge of getting "all the ducks in a row" to avoid surgery delays and cancellations. Primary care providers saw themselves as the "quarterback", ensuring care continuity and consideration of patient psychosocial factors.

CONCLUSIONS

While all have a shared responsibility for facilitating patient-centered decision-making and a safe perioperative course, each discipline has different areas of focus and expertise. Role clarification can help optimize the distribution of responsibilities and enhance perioperative communication and collaboration.

Trajectory Analysis of Healthcare Use Before and after Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Frailty correlates with worse postoperative outcomes and higher surgical cost, but the long-term impact on healthcare use remains ill-defined. We sought to evaluate patterns of healthcare use pre- and postsurgery among patients with gastrointestinal cancer and characterize the association with frailty.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on patients who underwent surgical resection for liver, biliary, pancreatic, colon and rectal cancer were obtained from the SEER-Medicare database from 2005 to 2020. Frailty was assessed using the claims-based frailty index. Group-based trajectory modeling identified clusters of patients with discrete patterns of healthcare use. Multivariable regression was performed to predict cluster membership based on preoperative factors, including frailty.

RESULTS

Among 66,684 beneficiaries, 4 distinct use trajectories based on data from 12 months before and after surgical resection were identified. After a surge in use during the month of surgical resection, most patients reverted to presurgery baseline use (low: 6,588, 9.9%; moderate: 17,627, 26.4%; and high: 29,850, 44.8%). However, a notable trajectory involving 12,619 (18.9%) patients was identified, wherein surgical resection precipitated a transition from a "low" presurgery use state to a "high" use state postsurgery. Frail patients were more likely to be among those individuals who transitioned to high users (low: 4.2% vs transition: 12.6% vs high: 7.5%; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis incorporating preoperative variables, frailty was associated with high group trajectory membership (ref: least and moderate; highest: odds ratio 4.90, 95% CI 4.49 to 5.35; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with gastrointestinal cancer demonstrated distinct clusters of healthcare use after surgical resection. Preoperative predictive models may help differentiate different healthcare use trajectories to help tailor care for patients in the postoperative period.

Trajectory Analysis of Health Care Utilization Before and After Major Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patterns of health care utilization before and after surgery and determine any association with preoperative frailty.

BACKGROUND

Frail patients experience worse postoperative outcomes and increased costs during the surgical encounter. Evidence is comparatively lacking for the longer-term effects of frailty on postoperative health care utilization.

METHODS

Retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis of adult patients undergoing any elective surgical procedure after preoperative frailty assessment with the Risk Analysis Index from February 2016 to December 2020 at a large integrated health care delivery and financing system. Group-based trajectory modeling of claims data estimated distinct clusters of patients with discrete utilization trajectories. Multivariable regression predicted membership in trajectories of interest using preoperative characteristics, including frailty.

RESULTS

Among 29,067 surgical encounters, 4 distinct utilization trajectories emerged in longitudinal data from the 12 months before and after surgery. All cases exhibited a surge in utilization during the surgical month, after which most patients returned to "low" [25,473 (87.6%)], "medium" [1403 (4.8%)], or "high" [528 (1.8%)] baseline utilization states established before surgery. The fourth trajectory identified 1663 (5.7%) cases where surgery occasioned a transition from "low" utilization before surgery to "high" utilization afterward. Risk Analysis Index score alone did not effectively predict membership in this transition group, but a multivariable model with other preoperative variables was effective ( c = 0.859, max rescaled R2 = 0.264).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery occasions the transition from low to high health care utilization for a substantial subgroup of surgical patients. Multivariable modeling may effectively discriminate this utilization trajectory, suggesting an opportunity to tailor care processes for these patients.

Preoperative Communication Between Anesthesia, Surgery, and Primary Care Providers for Older Surgical Patients

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal communication between clinicians remains a frequent driver of preventable adverse health care-related events, increased costs, and patient and physician dissatisfaction.

METHODS

Cross-sectional surveys on preoperative interspecialty communication, tailored by stakeholder type, were administered to (1) primary care providers in northern New England, (2) anesthesia providers working in the perioperative clinic of a tertiary rural academic medical center, (3) surgeons from the same center, and (4) older surgical patients who underwent preoperative assessment at the same center.

RESULTS

In total, 107/249 (43.0%) providers and 103/265 (39.9%) patients completed the survey. Preoperative communication was perceived as logistically challenging (59.8%), particularly across health systems. More than 77% of anesthesia and surgery providers indicated that they communicate frequently or sometimes, but 92.5% of primary care providers indicated that they rarely or never communicate with anesthesia providers. Some of the most common reasons for preoperative communication were discussion of complex patients, perioperative medication management, and optimization of comorbidities. Although 96.1% of older surgical patients reported that preoperative communication between providers is important, only 40.4% felt that their providers communicate very or extremely well. Many patients emphasized the importance of preoperative communication between providers to ensure transfer of critical clinical information.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons and anesthesiologists infrequently communicate with primary care providers in one rural tertiary center, in contrast to patient expectations and values. These study results will help identify priorities and potentially resolvable barriers to bridging the gap between the inpatient perioperative and outpatient primary care teams. Future studies should focus on strategies to improve communication between hospital and community providers to prevent complications and readmission.

Complications following single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty and unilateral procedures: experience of a high-volume community hospital

INTRODUCTION

The safety of single-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SSBTKA) compared to unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The present study compares the 90-day postoperative complications encountered following SSBTKA and unilateral TKA in an unselected cohort of patients performed at a high-volume community hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The perioperative electronic medical records of an unselected consecutive cohort of 1032 patients (1345 knees) having undergone unilateral or SSBTKA were reviewed. Ninety-day postoperative complications or need for additional procedures were compared between unilateral and SSBTKA groups.

RESULTS

A total of 719 and 313 patients underwent unilateral and SSBTKA, respectively. There were no significant differences in age or BMI between groups. Patients undergoing SSBTKA were more likely to be male (p = 0.019), have longer lengths of stay (p < 0.001) and were less likely to discharge directly home (13.1%) compared to unilateral patients (80.9%) (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing SSBTKA were more likely to require a transfusion (14.7%) compared to unilateral patients (2.2%) (p < 0.001). Interestingly, mortality rate following unilateral TKA (1.7%) was significantly higher than SSBTKA (0.0%) (p = 0.013). There were no significant differences regarding other complications or need for additional procedures within 90 days following surgery.

CONCLUSION

SSBTKA did not result in greater complications when compared to unilateral TKA in this particular cohort. As expected, transfusion rates will likely be higher and there will be a greater need for acute inpatient care following surgery for SSBTKA patients.

Systems of Care Delivery and Optimization in the Postoperative Care Wards

A third of all patients are at risk for a serious adverse event, including death, in the first month after undergoing a major surgery. Most of these events will occur within 24 hours of the operation but are unlikely to occur in the operating room or postanesthesia care unit. Most opioid-induced respiratory depression events in the postoperative period resulted in death (55%) or anoxic brain injury (22%). A future state of mature artificial intelligence and machine learning will improve situational awareness of acute clinical deterioration, minimize alert fatigue, and facilitate early intervention to minimize poor outcomes.

Systems of Care Delivery and Optimization in the Preoperative Arena

Key elements of an effective preoperative process include the following: history-taking, risk assessment, shared decision making, effective interdisciplinary communication, preoperative optimization of modifiable conditions, longitudinal care coordination, contribution to population health aims, and collection of outcomes-driven metrics. Perioperative medicine tenets can be applied by health systems of all sizes and demographics to improve quality and safety.

Rural implementation of the perioperative surgical home: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative surgical home (PSH) is a novel patient-centric surgical system developed by American Society of Anesthesiologist to improve outcomes and patient satisfaction. PSH has proven success in large urban health centers by reducing surgery cancellation, operating room time, length of stay (LOS), and readmission rates. Yet, only limited studies have assessed the impact of PSH on surgical outcomes in rural areas.

AIM

To evaluate the newly implemented PSH system at a community hospital by comparing the surgical outcomes using a longitudinal case-control study.

METHODS

The research study was conducted at an 83-bed, licensed level-III trauma rural community hospital. A total of 3096 TJR procedures were collected retrospectively between January 2016 and December 2021 and were categorized as PSH and non-PSH cohorts (n = 2305). To evaluate the importance of PSH in the rural surgical system, a case-control study was performed to compare TJR surgical outcomes (LOS, discharge disposition, and 90-d readmission) of the PSH cohort against two control cohorts [Control-1 PSH (C1-PSH) (n = 1413) and Control-2 PSH (C2-PSH) (n = 892)]. Statistical tests including Chi-square test or Fischer’s exact test were performed for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test or Student’s t-test were performed for continuous variables. The general linear models (Poisson regression and binomial logistic regression) were performed to fit adjusted models.

RESULTS

The LOS was significantly shorter in PSH cohort compared to two control cohorts (median PSH = 34 h, C1-PSH = 53 h, C2-PSH = 35 h) (P value < 0.05). Similarly, the PSH cohort had lower percentages of discharges to other facilities (PSH = 3.5%, C1-PSH = 15.5%, C2-PSH = 6.7%) (P value < 0.05). There was no statistical difference observed in 90-d readmission between control and PSH cohorts. However, the PSH implementation reduced the 90-d readmission percentage (PSH = 4.7%, C1-PSH = 6.1%, C2-PSH = 3.6%) lower than the national average 30-d readmission percentage which is 5.5%. The PSH system was effectively established at the rural community hospital with the help of team-based coordinated multi-disciplinary clinicians or physician co-management. The elements of PSH including preoperative assessment, patient education and optimization, and longitudinal digital engagement were vital for improving the TJR surgical outcomes at the community hospital.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the PSH system in a rural community hospital reduced LOS, increased direct-to-home discharge, and reduced 90-d readmission percentages.

Telemedicine in Anesthesiology: Using Simulation to Teach Remote Preoperative Assessment

BACKGROUND

The move toward telemedicine has markedly accelerated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Anesthesia residents must learn to provide preoperative assessments on a virtual platform. We created a pilot telemedicine curriculum for postgraduate year-2 (PGY2) anesthesiology.

METHODS

The curriculum included a virtual didactic session and a simulated virtual preoperative assessment with a standardized patient (SP). A faculty member and the SP provided feedback using a checklist based on the American Medical Association Telehealth Visit Etiquette Checklist and the American Board of Anesthesiology Applied Examination Objective Structured Clinical Examination content outline. Residents completed surveys assessing their perceptions of the effectiveness and helpfulness of the didactic session and simulated encounter, as well as the cognitive workload of the encounter.

RESULTS

A total of 12 PGY2 anesthesiology residents in their first month of clinical anesthesia residency training participated in this study. Whereas most (11/12) residents felt confident, very confident, or extremely confident in being able to conduct a telemedicine preoperative assessment after the didactic session, only 42% ensured adequate lighting and only 33% ensured patient privacy before conducting the visit. Postencounter survey comments indicated that the SP encounter was of greater value (more effective and helpful) than the didactic session. Residents perceived the encounter as demanding, but they felt successful in accomplishing it and did not feel rushed. Faculty and SP indicated that the checklist guided them in providing clear and useful formative feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

A virtual SP encounter can augment didactics to help residents learn and practice essential telemedicine skills for virtual preoperative assessments.

Predicting Length of Stay using machine learning for total joint replacements performed at a rural community hospital

BACKGROUND

Predicting patient's Length of Stay (LOS) before total joint replacement (TJR) surgery is vital for hospitals to optimally manage costs and resources. Many hospitals including in rural areas use publicly available models such as National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) calculator which, unfortunately, performs suboptimally when predicting LOS for TJR procedures.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this research was to develop a Machine Learning (ML) model to predict LOS for TJR procedures performed at a Perioperative Surgical Home implemented rural community hospital for better accuracy and interpretation than the NSQIP calculator.

METHODS

A total of 158 TJR patients were collected and analyzed from a rural community hospital located in Montana. A random forest (RF) model was used to predict patient's LOS. For interpretation, permuted feature importance and partial dependence plot methods were used to identify the important variables and their relationship with the LOS.

RESULTS

The root mean square error for the RF model (0.7) was lower than the NSQIP calculator (1.21). The five most important variables for predicting LOS were BMI, Duke Activity Status-Index, diabetes, patient's household income, and patient's age.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study is the first of its kind to develop an ML model to predict LOS for TJR procedures that were performed at a small-scale rural community hospital. This pilot study contributes an approach for rural hospitals, making them more independent by developing their own predictions instead of relying on public models.

An evaluation of perioperative surgical procedures and complications in classic bladder exstrophy patients Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P)

INTRODUCTION

Classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) repair report wide variation in success. Given the complexity of CBE care, benefit would be derived from validation of reported outcomes. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) data, this manuscript evaluates surgical complications for bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction in CBE patients.

AIM

The primary aim of this study was to determine complication rates in the CBE population for bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction in national studies compared to single-institutional studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Pediatric cases and complications were identified in the 2012-2019 NSQIP-P database in CBE patients who had either bladder closure or advanced urologic reconstruction. Bladder closure was further defined as early (<7 days) or delayed (>7 days). Differences were assessed using Fisher's exact test and analysis was conducted using SPSS with significance defined as p-value <0.05.

RESULTS

302 patients were included; 152 patients underwent bladder closure, and 150 patients underwent advanced urologic reconstruction. The 30-day complication rate for bladder closure is 30.3% and for advanced urologic reconstruction is 24.0% in the CBC cohort. No differences were found in the rates of NSQIP complications between early and delayed bladder closure, though significant differences (p < 0.001) were found in the rates of blood transfusion (17.9 vs 65.3%). This may be due to the different rates of osteotomy (25.0 vs 48.3%) between early and delayed bladder closure. Rates of readmission are 14.7% and rates of reoperation are 8.0% for advanced urologic reconstruction procedures. Both bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction had infectious issues in greater than 10% of the population.

DISCUSSION

CBE surgeries nationally carry a higher risk of complications than is reported in most institutional studies. Infectious complications occur greater than 10% of the time in both bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction, which should be the source of additional study given the inverse relationship infections pose to surgical success in BE patients. A limitation of this study is that the data is derived from Children's hospitals that elect to participate and includes only data from 30 days after a procedure.

CONCLUSION

CBE complication data for both bladder closure and advanced urologic reconstruction may be underrepresented in the literature.

The Perioperative Surgical Home, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and how integration of these models may improve care for medically complex patients

Perioperative medicine is changing rapidly, and with this change comes the opportunity to improve upon current models of care delivery and integration within the health care system. Perioperative models of care are structured or conceptual arrangements for surgical patients before, during and after their surgery. Models of care such as the Perioperative Surgical Home and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways are increasingly used to guide the structure of perioperative care delivery with an aim to improve patient outcomes and experience in Canadian settings. In this narrative review, we summarize the origins of these perioperative models of care. They are fundamentally different in scope and level of evidence. Both models have potential benefits and limitations to their broad implementation in our health care system. As currently developed, both models are limited in their application to patients with chronic disease. We discuss how these models of care can be used to develop integrated horizontal and vertical perioperative pathways in a Canadian setting. Such integration is a potential solution that will improve their applicability to patients with medically complex conditions and in times when health care systems are under pressure. We describe this approach using the example of patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis.

Conceptual Frameworks of Postoperative Recovery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a scoping review to identify existing conceptual frameworks of postoperative recovery (PR) and assess their content.

BACKGROUND

PR is increasingly recognized by providers and third-party payers as a multidimensional phenomenon. Efforts to optimize PR and reduce complications and readmissions continue to evolve through changes in care (i.e., enhanced recovery protocols) and financial incentives. Delineating all factors affecting PR using a conceptual framework should aid in the design of effective interventions.

METHODS

Web of Science and PubMed were queried to identify articles, between January 1980 and August of 2019, about conceptual frameworks of PR, using the search terms: "concept," "model," "framework," "recovery after surgery," "conceptual framework" "postoperative," "surgery," and "children." Articles considering PR as a concept rather than an outcome were included. Articles were examined in accordance with Walker and Avant's method for the concept analysis. Concepts identified across articles were classified as domains and subdomains of PR.

RESULTS

The search yielded 183 unique articles; 8 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most articles defined PR as a period of days to weeks (n = 7) rather than days (n = 1). PR was mostly conceptualized as a process involving the patient and the health care system (n = 4) rather than the patient alone (n = 2). Physiological recovery (n = 8), activities of daily living (n = 8), pain (n = 5), cognitive/psychological recovery (n = 4), social recovery (n = 2), and patient perspective (n = 1) were the identified domains. Existing patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess most PR domains; however, definitions of domains and subdomains differed. None of the PR conceptual frameworks included were specific to children.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few conceptual frameworks of PR in adults, and the definitions of PR differ. No framework was specific to children. Consensus on a conceptual framework of PR in adults and development of a conceptual framework of PR specific to children are needed.

Anesthesiologists' Role in Value-based Perioperative Care and Healthcare Transformation

Health care is undergoing major transformation with a shift from fee-for-service care to fee-for-value. The advent of new care delivery and payment models is serving as a driver for value-based care. Hospitals, payors, and patients increasingly expect physicians and healthcare systems to improve outcomes and manage costs. The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on surgical and procedural practices further highlights the urgency and need for anesthesiologists to expand their roles in perioperative care, and to impact system improvement. While there have been substantial advances in anesthesia care, perioperative complications and mortality after surgery remain a key concern. Anesthesiologists are in a unique position to impact perioperative health care through their multitude of interactions and influences on various aspects of the perioperative domain, by using the surgical experience as the first touchpoint to reengage the patient in their own health care. Among the key interventions that are being effectively instituted by anesthesiologists include proactive engagement in preoperative optimization of patients' health; personalization and standardization of care delivery by segmenting patients based upon their complexity and risk; and implementation of best practices that are data-driven and evidence-based and provide structure that allow the patient to return to their optimal state of functional, cognitive, and psychologic health. Through collaborative relationships with other perioperative stakeholders, anesthesiologists can consolidate their role as clinical leaders driving value-based care and healthcare transformation in the best interests of patients.

Financial and Clinical Ramifications of Introducing a Novel Pediatric Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Pediatric Complex Hip Reconstructive Surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways confer significant perioperative benefits to patients and are currently well described for adult patients undergoing a variety of surgical procedures. Robust data to support enhanced recovery pathway use in children are relatively lacking in the medical literature, though clinical benefits are reported in targeted pediatric surgical populations. Surgery for complex hip pathology in the adolescent patient is painful, often requiring prolonged courses of opioid analgesia. Postoperative opioid-related side effects may lead to prolonged recovery periods and suboptimal postoperative physical function. Excessive opioid use in the perioperative period is also a major risk factor for the development of opioid misuse in adolescents. Perioperative opioid reduction strategies in this vulnerable population will help to mitigate this risk.

METHODS

A total of 85 adolescents undergoing complex hip reconstructive surgery were enrolled into an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway (October 2015 to December 2018) and were compared with 110 patients undergoing similar procedures in previous years (March 2010 to September 2015). The primary outcome was total perioperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, postoperative nausea, intraoperative blood loss, and other perioperative outcomes. Total cost of care and specific charge sectors were also assessed. Segmented regression was used to assess the effects of pathway implementation on outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders, including the preimplementation trend over time.

RESULTS

Before pathway implementation, there was a significant downward trend over time in average perioperative opioid consumption (-0.10 mg total morphine equivalents/90 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.20 to 0.00) and several secondary perioperative outcomes. However, there was no evidence that pathway implementation by itself significantly altered the prepathway trend in perioperative opioid consumption (ie, the preceding trend continued). For postanesthesia care unit time, the downward trend leveled off significantly (pre: -5.25 min/90 d; 95% CI, -6.13 to -4.36; post: 1.04 min/90 d; 95% CI, -0.47 to 2.56; Change: 6.29; 95% CI, 4.53-8.06). Clinical, laboratory, pharmacy, operating room, and total charges were significantly associated with pathway implementation. There was no evidence that pathway implementation significantly altered the prepathway trend in other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The impacts of our pediatric enhanced recovery pathway for adolescents undergoing complex hip reconstruction are consistent with the ongoing improvement in perioperative metrics at our institution but are difficult to distinguish from the impacts of other initiatives and evolving practice patterns in a pragmatic setting. The ERAS pathway helped codify and organize this new pattern of care, promoting multidisciplinary evidence-based care patterns and sustaining positive preexisting trends in financial and clinical metrics.

[Patient-centered perioperative vigilance: perioperative process quality, effectiveness of pain treatment and mobilization progress after implementation of a treatment bundle for total knee endoprosthesis]

Hintergrund

In den USA wurde das Konzept des „perioperative surgical home“ initialisiert, in dem ein teamorientiertes Vorgehen einen umfassenderen und zügigeren Heilverlauf erzielen soll.

Fragestellung

Evaluation des Effekts eines interdisziplinären Maßnahmenbündels (patient*innenzentrierte perioperative Versorgung, PPV) auf Aspekte der Prozessqualität unter deutschen Rahmenbedingungen.

Material und Methoden

Nach Einführung des PPV-Maßnahmenbündels (1. Patient*innenseminar, 2. spezifische Chirurgietechnik, 3. spezifische Anästhesietechnik, 4. Physiotherapiebeginn am Operationstag) wurden 34 Patient*innen mit elektiver Knietotalendoprothese prospektiv untersucht und mit „matched-pair“-Kontrollen verglichen. Endpunkte sind Dauer der Einleitungszeit (primär) und Krankenhausverweildauer, Ruhe- und Belastungsschmerz am 1. postoperativen Tag (numerische Analogskala), und Mobilisationsfortschritt (MBF) an den postoperativen Tagen 1, 3 und 6 (sekundär). Gruppenvergleiche wurden mit Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Tests auf Nichtunterlegenheit durchgeführt. Im Fall von Nichtunterlegenheit wurde anschließend auf Überlegenheit getestet.

Ergebnisse

Die Einleitungszeit in der PPV-Gruppe betrug im Median 13,5 min (Kontrollgruppe: 60 min, p < 0,0001), die Krankenhausverweildauer betrug in der PPV-Gruppe 8 Tage (Kontrollgruppe: 12 Tage, p < 0,0001). Am ersten postoperativen Tag betrug die mediane Ruheschmerzstärke in der PPV-Gruppe 30 (Kontrollgruppe: 20); die Belastungsschmerzstärke war in beiden Gruppen gleich (Median 40). Die Mobilisation der Patienten*innen der PPV-Gruppe gelang an den postoperativen Tagen 1, 3 und 6 besser (jeweils p < 0,0001).

Schlussfolgerung

Das Konzept der patient*innenzentrierten perioperativen Versorgung (PPV) erscheint vielversprechend genug, um weitere klinische Studien zu rechtfertigen.

Optimization of the Operating Room Scheduling Process for Improving Efficiency in a Tertiary Hospital

Efficient operating room (OR) scheduling can improve OR utilization and reduce costs. We hypothesize that the scheduling office (ORSO) leading the modification scheduling process could increase OR utilization rate. Using retrospective data from a single tertiary hospital in two consecutive calendar years, we compared OR utilization rate, the number of daily cases and cumulative operative time in the pre- and post-implementation of scheduling process alteration. We operated about 100,609 cases in the OR during the study period. Daytime utilization rate increased from 85.6% to 89.4% (P < 0.001); overall OR utilization rate from 115.1% to 117.6% (P = 0.019); daily case numbers from 229.9 ± 7.3 to 239.6 ± 7.6 (P = 0.0.14); and cumulative operation time of total and daytime cases from 611.7 case-hour/day to 624.5 case-hour/day (P = 0.013) and from 510.8 case-hour/day to 533.8 case-hour/day (P < 0.001), respectively. Evening/night time case-hour significantly decreased from 100.9 case-hour/day to 90.7 case-hour/day (P < 0.001). The optimization of the scheduling process and coordination by the office during regular workhours resulted in enhanced OR efficiency. The OR scheduling office can act as a control tower to make OR management more flexible, which can improve efficiency and carry financial benefits in tertiary hospitals.

The Perioperative Surgical Home in Pediatrics: Improve Patient Outcomes, Decrease Cancellations, Improve HealthCare Spending and Allocation of Resources during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Cancellations or delays in surgical care for pediatric patients that present to the operating room create a great obstacle for both the physician and the patient. Perioperative outpatient management begins prior to the patient entering the hospital for the day of surgery, and many organizations practice using the perioperative surgical home (PSH), incorporating enhanced recovery concepts. This paper describes changes in standard operating procedures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and proposes the expansion of PSH, as a means of improving perioperative quality of care in pediatric populations.

Implementing a Pediatric Perioperative Surgical Home Integrated Care Coordination Pathway for Laryngeal Cleft Repair

BACKGROUND

The Pediatric Perioperative Surgical Home (PPSH) model is an integrative care model designed to provide better patient care and value by shifting focus from the patient encounter level to the overarching surgical episode of care. So far, no PPSH model has targeted a complex airway disorder. It was hypothesized that the development of a PPSH for laryngeal cleft repair would reduce the high rates of postoperative resource utilization observed in this population.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained for the purpose of data collection and analysis. A multidisciplinary team of anesthesiologists, surgeons, nursing staff, information technology specialists, and finance administrators was gathered during the PPSH development phase. Standardized perioperative (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) protocols were developed, with a focus on preoperative risk stratification. Patients presenting before surgery with ≥1 predefined medical comorbidity were triaged to the intensive care unit (ICU) postoperatively, while patients without severe systemic disease were triaged to a lower-acuity floor for overnight observation. The success of the PPSH protocol was defined by quality outcome and value measurements.

RESULTS

The PPSH initiative included 120 patients, and the pre-PPSH period included 115 patients who underwent laryngeal cleft repair before implementation of the new process. Patients in the pre-PPSH period were reviewed and classified as ICU candidates or lower acuity floor candidates had they presented in the post-PPSH period. Among the 79 patients in the pre-PPSH period who were identified as candidates for the lower-acuity floor transfer, 70 patients (89%) were transferred to the ICU (P < .001). Retrospective analysis concluded that 143 ICU bedded days could have been avoided in the pre-PPSH group by using PPSH risk stratification. Surgery duration (P = .034) and hospital length of stay (P = .015) were found to be slightly longer in the group of pre-PPSH observation unit candidates. Rates of 30-day unplanned readmissions to the hospital were not associated with the new PPSH initiative (P = .093). No patients in either group experienced emergent postoperative intubation or other expected complications. Total hospital costs were not lower for PPSH observation unit patients as compared to pre-PPSH observation unit candidates (difference = 8%; 95% confidence interval, -7% to 23%).

CONCLUSIONS

A well-defined preoperative screening protocol for patients undergoing laryngeal cleft repair can reduce postoperative ICU utilization without affecting patient safety. Further research is needed to see if these findings are applicable to other complex airway surgeries.

Understanding the Costs Associated With Surgical Care Delivery in the Medicare Population

BACKGROUND

Surgical care has been largely untargeted by Medicare payment reforms because episode costs associated with its delivery are not currently well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the costs of inpatient and outpatient surgery in the Medicare population.

METHODS

We analyzed claims data from a 20% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries (2008-2014). For a given study year, we identified all inpatient and outpatient procedures and constructed claims windows around them to define surgical episodes. After summing payments for services rendered during each episode, we totaled all inpatient and outpatient episode payments by surgical specialty. For inpatient episodes, we determined component payments related to the index hospitalization, readmissions, physician services, and postacute care. For outpatient episodes, we differentiated by the site of care (hospital outpatient department versus physician office versus ambulatory surgery center). We used linear regression to evaluate temporal trends in inpatient and outpatient surgical spending. Finally, we estimated the contribution of surgical care to overall Medicare expenditures.

RESULTS

Total Medicare payments for surgical care are substantial, representing 51% of Program spending in 2014. They declined modestly over the study period, from $133.1 billion in 2008 to $124.9 billion in 2014 (-6.2%, P = 0.085 for the temporal trend). While spending on inpatient surgery contributed the most to total surgical payments (69.4% in 2014), it declined over the study period, driven by decreases in index hospitalization (-16.7%, P = 0.002) and readmissions payments (-27.0%, P = 0.003). In contrast, spending on outpatient surgery increased by $8.5 billion (28.7%, P < 0.001). This increase was realized across all sites of care (hospital outpatient department: 36.6%, P < 0.001; physician office: 22.1%, P < 0.001; ambulatory surgery center: 36.6%, P < 0.001). Ophthalmology and hand surgery witnessed the greatest growth in surgical spending over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Surgical care accounts for half of all Medicare spending. Our findings not only highlight the magnitude of spending on surgery, but also the areas of greatest growth, which could be targeted by future payment reforms.

The Future of Data-Driven Wound Care

Care for patients with chronic wounds can be complex, and the chances of poor outcomes are high if wound care is not optimized through evidence-based protocols. Tracking and managing every variable and comorbidity in patients with wounds is difficult despite the increasing use of wound-specific electronic medical records. Harnessing the power of big data analytics to help nurses and physicians provide optimized care based on the care provided to millions of patients can result in better outcomes. Numerous applications of machine learning toward workflow improvements, inpatient monitoring, outpatient communication, and hospital operations can improve overall efficiency and efficacy of care delivery in and out of the hospital, while reducing adverse events and complications. This article provides an overview of the application of big data analytics and machine learning in health care, highlights important recent advances, and discusses how these technologies may revolutionize advanced wound care.

Cost-Effectiveness Research in Anesthesiology

Perioperative interventions aimed at decreasing costs and improving outcomes have become increasingly popular in recent years. Anesthesiologists are often faced with a choice among different treatment strategies with little data available on the comparative cost-effectiveness. We performed a systematic review of the English language literature between 1980 and 2014 to identify cost-effectiveness analyses of anesthesiology and perioperative medicine interventions. We excluded interventions related to critical care or pediatric anesthesiology, and articles on interventions not normally ordered or performed by anesthesiologists. Of the >5000 cost-effectiveness analyses published to date, only 28 were applicable to anesthesiology and perioperative medicine and met inclusion criteria. Multidisciplinary interventions were the most cost-effective overall; 8 of 8 interventions were "dominant" (improved outcomes, reduced cost) or cost-effective, including accelerated, standardized perioperative recovery pathways, and perioperative delirium prevention bundles. Intraoperative measures were dominant in 3 of 5 cases, including spinal anesthesia for benign abdominal hysterectomy. With regard to prevention of perioperative infection, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonization was dominant or cost-effective in 2 of 2 studies. Three studies assessing various antibiotic prophylaxis regimens had mixed results. Autologous blood donation was not found to be cost-effective in 5 of 7 studies, and intraoperative cell salvage therapy was also not cost-effective in 2 of 2 reports. Overall, there remains a paucity of cost-effectiveness literature in anesthesiology, particularly relating to intraoperative interventions and multidisciplinary perioperative interventions. Based on the available studies, multidisciplinary perioperative optimization interventions such as accelerated, standardized perioperative recovery pathways, and perioperative delirium prevention bundles tended to be most cost-effective. Our review demonstrates that there is a need for more rigorous cost-effective analyses in many areas of anesthesiology and that anesthesiologists should continue to lead collaborative, multidisciplinary efforts in perioperative medicine.

Projecting Cost Containment in the Operating Room Utilizing Incentivized Strategies to Reduce Healthcare Cost

Introduction:

Streamlining healthcare in United States is of paramount concern while maintaining standards of quality and safety. Incentivizing change may be even more effective in driving such measures. At Nationwide Children’s Hospital, we incentivize cost savings directly to the healthcare team member. In this project, we evaluated a simple substitution of a buretrol for Y-type tubing based on weight rather than age cutoffs.

Methods:

This was deemed a quality improvement project and therefore exempt from Institutional Review Board approval. We obtained costs of Y-type tubing versus buretrols. We interrogated the electronic medical record to quantify case volume in the main operating room according to age and weight. We calculated our costs to compare our current practice of using buretrol fo age ≤ 12 years and the planned practice of using buretrol for weight < 20 kg.

Results:

We identified 28,875 children ages 0-12 (60% weight <20kg) and 6,301 children ages 13-18 (0.1% weight <20kg) undergoing procedures in the main operating rooms over a 1-year period.. A unit cost savings of $4.40 substituting Y-type tubing for a buretrol was determined. Transitioning from age-based to weight-based criteria for buretrol use was determined to potentially save $51,260 over the period reviewed.

Conclusions:

Simple changes can impact efficiency and cost in healthcare. It is important to consider incentivizing such measures to help drive these changes. In the future, with more incentivized measures, hopefully we can successfully make an impact of efficiency and cost of healthcare in United States without compromising safety or quality.

Designing and Running a Preoperative Clinic

Value in health care has been described as quality divided by cost, where quality is the sum of patient outcomes and experience. A well-run preoperative evaluation clinic (PEC) offers many opportunities to improve the value of the care delivered to patients by reducing the associated costs and improving the quality of care. Certain patient education and medical optimization strategies initiated in the PEC clinic are linked to an improvement in patients' long-term health outcomes. When designing a PEC, it is important to address the PEC's mission and scope with all stakeholders early in the process.

Preoperative Evaluation Clinic Redesign: An Initiative to Improve Access, Efficiency, and Staff Satisfaction

In 2008, Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, developed the preoperative evaluation (POE) clinic under the department of anesthesiology to provide preoperative history and physical examination, and medical optimization. Over time, the POE clinic expanded to accommodate more than 90% of surgical patients, outgrowing the initial practice model. The increased patient volume with shortened turnaround times bottlenecked patient access. A multidisciplinary quality improvement team used Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control methodology to understand the issues, test potential solutions, and develop sustainable processes. With progressive Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, it moved from small internal tests of change to implementation throughout the institution. Patient access improved by 14% (P < .001) and triage efficiency by 30% (P < .001). These elements led to a 14% improvement in operating margin and a 24% improvement in staff satisfaction. Sustainability was ensured with an accessible dashboard of performance indicators.

Perioperative Surgical Home Models

The rising prominence of value-based health care and population health management supports evolving perioperative surgical home (PSH) models that rely on continuously evolving evidence-based best practice and telemedicine and telehealth, including mobile technologies and connectivity. To successfully deliver greater perioperative valued-based care and to effectively contribute to sustained and meaningful perioperative population health management, the scope of existing perioperative management and its associated services and care provider skills must be expanded. This article focuses on the PSH model as continued opportunity and mechanism for delivering greater value-based, comprehensive perioperative assessment and global optimization of surgical patients.

Nurse Practitioner-Driven Optimization of Presurgical Testing

Nurse practitioners play a pivotal role as members of the perioperative team. This article outlines the evolution of presurgical testing from the vantage of generic testing to one that is tailored to the patient's clinical presentation and the type of surgery to be performed, whether it is high, intermediate, or low risk. Emphasis is placed on indicated testing, screening tools to identify patients at risk for perioperative complications, the optimization of patients before undergoing major cancer surgery, and enhanced recovery after surgery. The goal was to bring awareness to our colleagues that evidence-based practice defines the present role of the nurse practitioner in this setting and evidence will shape its future direction.

Measuring Team Effectiveness in the Health Care Setting: An Inventory of Survey Tools

Background:

Guidance for measuring team effectiveness in dynamic clinical settings is necessary; however, there are no consensus strategies to help health care organizations achieve optimal teamwork. This systematic review aims to identify validated survey instruments of team effectiveness by clinical settings.

Methods:

PubMed, MEDLINE, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched for team effectiveness surveys deployed from 1990 to 2016. Validity and reliability were evaluated using 4 psychometric properties: interrater agreement, internal consistency, content validity, and structural integrity. Two conceptual frameworks, the Donabedian model and the Command Team Effectiveness model, assess conceptual dimensions most measured in each health care setting.

Results:

The 22 articles focused on surgical, primary care, and other health care settings. Few instruments report the required psychometric properties or feature non-self-reported outcomes. The major conceptual dimensions measured in the survey instruments differed across settings. Team cohesion and overall perceived team effectiveness can be found in all the team effectiveness measurement tools regardless of the health care setting. We found that surgical settings have distinctive conditions for measuring team effectiveness relative to primary or ambulatory care.

Discussion:

Further development of setting-specific team effectiveness measurement tools can help further enhance continuous quality improvements and clinical outcomes in the future.

From programme theory to logic models for multispecialty community providers: a realist evidence synthesis

Background

The NHS policy of constructing multispecialty community providers (MCPs) rests on a complex set of assumptions about how health systems can replace hospital use with enhanced primary care for people with complex, chronic or multiple health problems, while contributing savings to health-care budgets.

Objectives

To use policy-makers’ assumptions to elicit an initial programme theory (IPT) of how MCPs can achieve their outcomes and to compare this with published secondary evidence and revise the programme theory accordingly.

Design

Realist synthesis with a three-stage method: (1) for policy documents, elicit the IPT underlying the MCP policy, (2) review and synthesise secondary evidence relevant to those assumptions and (3) compare the programme theory with the secondary evidence and, when necessary, reformulate the programme theory in a more evidence-based way.

Data sources

Systematic searches and data extraction using (1) the Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC) database for policy statements and (2) topically appropriate databases, including MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA). A total of 1319 titles and abstracts were reviewed in two rounds and 116 were selected for full-text data extraction. We extracted data using a formal data extraction tool and synthesised them using a framework reflecting the main policy assumptions.

Results

The IPT of MCPs contained 28 interconnected context–mechanism–outcome relationships. Few policy statements specified what contexts the policy mechanisms required. We found strong evidence supporting the IPT assumptions concerning organisational culture, interorganisational network management, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), the uses and effects of health information technology (HIT) in MCP-like settings, planned referral networks, care planning for individual patients and the diversion of patients from inpatient to primary care. The evidence was weaker, or mixed (supporting some of the constituent assumptions but not others), concerning voluntary sector involvement, the effects of preventative care on hospital admissions and patient experience, planned referral networks and demand management systems. The evidence about the effects of referral reductions on costs was equivocal. We found no studies confirming that the development of preventative care would reduce demands on inpatient services. The IPT had overlooked certain mechanisms relevant to MCPs, mostly concerning MDTs and the uses of HITs.

Limitations

The studies reviewed were limited to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries and, because of the large amount of published material, the period 2014–16, assuming that later studies, especially systematic reviews, already include important earlier findings. No empirical studies of MCPs yet existed.

Conclusions

Multidisciplinary teams are a central mechanism by which MCPs (and equivalent networks and organisations) work, provided that the teams include the relevant professions (hence, organisations) and, for care planning, individual patients. Further primary research would be required to test elements of the revised logic model, in particular about (1) how MDTs and enhanced general practice compare and interact, or can be combined, in managing referral networks and (2) under what circumstances diverting patients from in-patient to primary care reduces NHS costs and improves the quality of patient experience.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016038900.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula.

Optimising perioperative care for hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa: a Delphi consensus study

Background

A structured approach to perioperative patient management based on an enhanced recovery pathway protocol facilitates early recovery and reduces morbidity in high income countries. However, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the feasibility of implementing enhanced recovery pathways and its influence on patient outcomes is scarcely investigated. To inform similar practice in LMICs for total hip and knee arthroplasty, it is necessary to identify potential factors for inclusion in such a programme, appropriate for LMICs.

Methods

Applying a Delphi method, 33 stakeholders (13 arthroplasty surgeons, 12 anaesthetists and 8 physiotherapists) from 10 state hospitals representing 4 South African provinces identified and prioritised i) risk factors associated with poor outcomes, ii) perioperative interventions to improve outcomes and iii) patient and clinical outcomes necessary to benchmark practice for patients scheduled for primary elective unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Results

Thirty of the thirty-three stakeholders completed the 3 months Delphi study. The first round yielded i) 36 suggestions to preoperative risk factors, ii) 14 (preoperative), 18 (intraoperative) and 23 (postoperative) suggestions to best practices for perioperative interventions to improve outcomes and iii) 25 suggestions to important postsurgical outcomes. These items were prioritised by the group in the consecutive rounds and consensus was reached for the top ten priorities for each category.

Conclusion

The consensus derived risk factors, perioperative interventions and important outcomes will inform the development of a structured, perioperative multidisciplinary enhanced patient care protocol for total hip and knee arthroplasty. It is anticipated that this study will provide the construct necessary for developing pragmatic enhanced care pathways aimed at improving patient outcomes after arthroplasty in LMICs.

Making the pediatric perioperative surgical home come to life by leveraging existing health information technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To design a patient data dashboard for the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine at Boston Children's Hospital that supports care integration across the healthcare system as described by the pediatric perioperative surgical home (PPSH) initiative.

RECENT FINDINGS

By using 360 Technology, patient data was automatically pulled from all available Electronic Health Record sources from 2005 to the present. The PPSH dashboard described in this report provides a guide for implementation of PPSH Clinical Care Pathways. The dashboard integrates several databases to allow for visual longitudinal tracking of patient care, outcomes, and cost. The integration of electronic information provided the ability to display, compare, and analyze selected PPSH metrics in real time. By utilizing the PPSH dashboard format the use of an automated, integrated clinical, and financial health data profile for a specific patient population may improve clinicians' ability to have a comprehensive assessment of all care elements. This more global clinical thinking has the potential to produce bottom-up, evidence-based healthcare reform.

SUMMARY

The experience with the PPSH dashboard provides solid evidence for the use of integrated Electronic Health Record to improve patient outcomes and decrease cost.

Patient Health Engagement (PHE) model in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): monitoring patients' engagement and psychological resilience in minimally invasive thoracic surgery

In the last decade, the humanization of medicine has contributed to an important shift in medical paradigms (from a doctor-centered to a patient-centered approach to care). This paradigm shift promoted a greater acknowledgement of patient engagement as a crucial asset for healthcare due to its benefits on both clinical outcomes and healthcare sustainability. Particularly, patient engagement should be considered a vital parameter for the healthcare system as well as it is a marker of the patients' ability to be resilient to the illness experience and thus to be an effective manager of his/her own health after the diagnosis. For this reason, measuring and promoting patient engagement both in chronic and acute care is today a priority for healthcare systems all over the world. In this contribution, the authors propose the Patient Health Engagement (PHE) model and the PHE scale as scientific and reliable tools to orient clinical actions and organizational strategies based on the patient engagement score. Particularly, this work discusses the implication of the adoption of these scientific tools in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) experience and their potentialities for healthcare professionals working in thoracic surgery settings.

Organizational capacity for change in health care: Development and validation of a scale

BACKGROUND

We do not have a strong understanding of a health care organization's capacity for attempting and completing multiple and sometimes competing change initiatives. Capacity for change implementation is a critical success factor as the health care industry is faced with ongoing demands for change and transformation because of technological advances, market forces, and regulatory environment.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a tool to measure health care organizations' capacity to change by building upon previous conceptualizations of absorptive capacity and organizational readiness for change.

METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

A multistep process was used to develop the organizational capacity for change survey. The survey was sent to two populations requesting answers to questions about the organization's leadership, culture, and technologies in use throughout the organization. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to validate the survey as a measurement tool for organizational capacity for change in the health care setting.

FINDINGS

The resulting organizational capacity for change measurement tool proves to be a valid and reliable method of evaluating a hospital's capacity for change through the measurement of the population's perceptions related to leadership, culture, and organizational technologies.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The organizational capacity for change measurement tool can help health care managers and leaders evaluate the capacity of employees, departments, and teams for change before large-scale implementation.

Market Evaluation: Finances, Bundled Payments, and Accountable Care Organizations

To control costs and improve quality, changes in health care delivery and financing have emerged, resulting in shifting of financial risk to providers for the quality and cost of care, including emergence of accountable care organizations and bundled payment models. This article discusses health care financing and delivery models in the context of procedures and surgeries that happen outside of the operating room. It describes the history of health insurance, trends in ambulatory surgery centers, and new payment models that have emerged from the Affordable Care Act and the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act.

Consensus Statement for Clinical Pathway Development for Perioperative Pain Management and Care Transitions

The perioperative surgical home (PSH) model has been created with the intention to reduce costs and to improve efficiency of care and patient experience in the perioperative period. The PSH is a comprehensive model of care that is team-based and patient-centric. The team in each facility should be multidisciplinary and include the input of perioperative services leadership, surgical services, and support personnel in order to provide seamless care for the patient from the preoperative period when decision to undergo surgery is initially made to discharge and, if needed after discharge from the hospital, until full recovery is achieved. PSH is discussed in this consensus article with the emphasis on perioperative care coordination of patients with chronic pain conditions. Preoperative optimization can be successfully undertaken through patient evaluation, screening, and education. Many important positive implications in the PSH model, in particular for those patients with increased potential morbidity, mortality, and high-risk populations, including those with a history of substance abuse or anxiety, reflect a more modern approach to health care. Newer strategies, such as preemptive and multimodal analgesic techniques, have been demonstrated to reduce opioid consumption and to improve pain relief. Continuous catheters, ketamine, methadone, buprenorphine, and other modalities can be best delivered with the expertise of an anesthesiologist and a support team, such as an acute pain care coordinator. A physician-led PSH is a model of care that is patient-centered with the integration of care from multiple disciplines and is ideally suited for leadership from the anesthesia team. Optimum pain control will have a significant positive impact on the measures of the PSH, including lowering of complication rates, lowering of readmissions, improved patient satisfaction, reduced morbidity and mortality, and shortening of hospital stays. All stakeholders should work together and consider the PSH model to ensure the best quality of health care for patients undergoing surgery in the future. The pain management physician's role in the postoperative period should be focused on providing optimal analgesia associated with improved patient satisfaction and outcomes that result in reduced health care costs.

The Implementation of a Preoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography Consult Service by Anesthesiologists

We describe a preoperative transthoracic echocardiography consult service led by anesthesiologists. The implementation process and the patient cohort are described. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiographic examinations were mostly performed in patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk noncardiac surgery and in patients with a higher calculated mortality risk. All transthoracic echocardiographic examinations were interpreted by anesthesiologists.

The Perioperative Surgical Home: Improving the Value and Quality of Care in Total Joint Replacement

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The perioperative surgical home (PSH) is a patient-centered, physician-led, multidisciplinary care pathway developed to deliver value-based care based on shared decision-making. Physician and hospital reimbursement will be tied to providing quality care at lower cost, and the PSH model has been used in providing care to patients undergoing lower extremity arthroplasty. The purpose of this review is to discuss the rationale, definition, development, current state, and future direction of the PSH.

RECENT FINDINGS

The PSH model guides the patient throughout the pre and perioperative process and into the postoperative phase. It has been shown in multiple studies to decrease length of stay, improve functional outcomes, allow more home discharges, and lower costs. There is no increase in complications or readmission rates. The PSH pathway is a safe and effective method of providing value-based care to patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty.