A model to predict delivery time following induction of labor at term with a dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Dinoprostone vaginal insert is the most common pharmacological method for induction of labor (IOL); however, studies on assessing the time to vaginal delivery (DT) following dinoprostone administration are limited.

AIMS

We sought to identify the primary factors influencing DT in women from central China, at or beyond term, who underwent IOL with dinoprostone vaginal inserts.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the data of 1562 women at 37 weeks 0 days to 41 weeks 6 days of gestation who underwent dinoprostone-induced labor between January 1st, 2019, and December 31st, 2021. The outcomes of interest were vaginal or cesarean delivery and factors influencing DT, including maternal complications and neonatal characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled women, 71% (1109/1562) delivered vaginally, with median DT of 740.50 min (interquartile range 443.25 to 1264.50 min). Of the remaining 29% (453/1562), who delivered by cesarean section, 11.9% (54/453) were multiparous. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that multiparity, advanced maternal age, fetal macrosomia, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and daytime insertion of dinoprostone were the factors that significantly influenced DT. Time to vaginal delivery increased with advanced maternal age and fetal macrosomia and decreased with multiparity, PROM, and daytime insertion of dinoprostone. A mathematical model was developed to integrate these factors for predicting DT: Y = 804.478 - 125.284 × multiparity + 765.637 × advanced maternal age + 411.511 × fetal macrosomia-593.358 × daytime insertion of dinoprostone - 125.284 × PROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may help obstetricians estimate the DT before placing a dinoprostone insert, which may improve patient management in busy maternity wards and minimize potential risks.

Neonatal complications and risk factors associated with assisted vaginal delivery

To investigate neonatal injuries, morbidities and risk factors related to vaginal deliveries. This retrospective, descriptive study identified 3500 patients who underwent vaginal delivery between 2020 and 2022. Demographic data, neonatal injuries, complications arising from vaginal delivery and pertinent risk factors were documented. Neonatal injuries and morbidities were prevalent in cases of assisted vacuum delivery, gestational diabetes mellitus class A2 (GDMA2) and pre-eclampsia with severe features. Caput succedaneum and petechiae were observed in 291/3500 cases (8.31%) and 108/3500 cases (3.09%), respectively. Caput succedaneum was associated with multiparity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.57, P < 0.001) and assisted vacuum delivery (AOR 5.18, 95% CI 2.60-10.3, P < 0.001). Cephalohaematoma was linked to GDMA2 (AOR 11.3, 95% CI 2.96-43.2, P < 0.001) and assisted vacuum delivery (AOR 16.5, 95% CI 6.71-40.5, P < 0.001). Scalp lacerations correlated with assisted vacuum and forceps deliveries (AOR 6.94, 95% CI 1.85-26.1, P < 0.004; and AOR 10.5, 95% CI 1.08-102.2, P < 0.042, respectively). Neonatal morbidities were associated with preterm delivery (AOR 3.49, 95% CI 1.39-8.72, P = 0.008), night-time delivery (AOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.63, P = 0.009) and low birth weight (AOR 7.52, 95% CI 3.79-14.9, P < 0.001). Neonatal injuries and morbidities were common in assisted vacuum delivery, maternal GDMA2, pre-eclampsia with severe features, preterm delivery and low birth weight. Cephalohaematoma and scalp lacerations were prevalent in assisted vaginal deliveries. Most morbidities occurred at night.Clinical trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry 20220126004.

Time of Birth and the Risk of Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes-A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives: To determine whether in a labor floor housed continuously by senior physicians the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcome is affected by time of delivery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study, conducted at a tertiary medical center, assessed singleton term deliveries from 1 January 2011 to 30 January 2020. Participants were categorized based on delivery timing, correlating with nursing shifts, to evaluate perinatal outcomes. The primary endpoint included adverse maternal outcomes such as emergency Cesarean section, anal sphincter injuries, blood product transfusions, and postpartum surgeries (laparotomy/laparoscopy). Secondary outcomes focused on neonatal health indicators, including low Apgar scores, ICU admissions, respiratory issues, extended hospital stays, and neurological complications. Results: 87,863 deliveries were available for analysis with equal distribution during the day. The risk of adverse composite maternal outcome was highest during the evening (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.18-1.32) and lowest during the night (aOR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99) compared to daytime deliveries. This difference was primarily driven by the highest rate of emergency CD in the evening. Neonatal outcomes were comparable, except for length of stay > 5 days, which was more frequent among newborns delivered during the evening and night shifts compared to the morning shift (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.33 and aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.31, respectively). Conclusions: In term pregnancies, the evening shift is associated with the highest risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes despite physician seniority.

Outcomes of assisted reproductive technology procedures performed on weekdays versus weekends: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To evaluate if assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes are different based on whether procedures - oocyte retrieval, insemination, embryo biopsy, or embryo transfer - are performed on a weekday versus weekend/holiday.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of all patients ≥ 18 years old who underwent oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization or oocyte banking (n = 3,197 cycles), fresh or natural-cycle frozen embryo transfers (n = 1,739 transfers), or had embryos biopsied for pre-implantation genetic testing (n = 4,568 embryos) in a large academic practice from 2015-2020. The primary outcomes were as follows: oocyte maturity for oocyte retrievals; fertilization rate for insemination; rate of no result on pre-implantation genetic testing for embryo biopsy; and live birth rate for embryo transfers.

RESULTS

The average number of procedures performed per embryologist per day was higher on weekends/holidays than weekdays. For oocyte retrievals performed on weekdays vs. weekends/holidays, there was no difference in oocyte maturity rate (88% vs 88%). There was no difference in the fertilization rate (82% vs 80%) in cycles that had intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed on weekdays vs. weekends/holidays. No difference was found in the no result rate for embryos biopsied on weekdays vs. weekends/holidays (2.5% vs 1.8%). Finally, there was no difference by weekday vs. weekend/holiday in the live birth rate per transfer among all transfers (39.6% vs 36.1%), or when stratified by fresh (35.1% vs 34.9%) or frozen embryo transfer (49.7% vs. 39.6%).

CONCLUSION

We found no differences in ART outcomes among women who had their oocyte retrievals, inseminations, embryo biopsies, or embryo transfers performed on weekdays versus weekends/holidays.

Cerebral regional tissue Oxygen Saturation to Guide Oxygen Delivery in preterm neonates during immediate transition after birth (COSGOD III): multicentre randomised phase 3 clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether monitoring of cerebral tissue oxygen saturation using near infrared spectroscopy in addition to routine monitoring combined with defined treatment guidelines during immediate transition and resuscitation increases survival without cerebral injury of premature infants compared with standard care alone.

DESIGN

Multicentre, multinational, randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

SETTING

11 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in six countries in Europe and in Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

1121 pregnant women (<32 weeks' gestation) were screened prenatally. The primary outcome was analysed in 607 of 655 randomised preterm neonates: 304 neonates in the near infrared spectroscopy group and 303 in the control group.

INTERVENTION

Preterm neonates were randomly assigned to either standard care (control group) or standard care plus monitoring of cerebral oxygen saturation with a dedicated treatment guideline (near infrared spectroscopy group) during immediate transition (first 15 minutes after birth) and resuscitation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome, assessed using all cause mortality and serial cerebral ultrasonography, was a composite of survival without cerebral injury. Cerebral injury was defined as any intraventricular haemorrhage or cystic periventricular leukomalacia, or both, at term equivalent age or before discharge.

RESULTS

Cerebral tissue oxygen saturation was similar in both groups. 252 (82.9%) out of 304 neonates (median gestational age 28.9 (interquartile range 26.9-30.6) weeks) in the near infrared spectroscopy group survived without cerebral injury compared with 238 (78.5%) out of 303 neonates (28.6 (26.6-30.6) weeks) in the control group (relative risk 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.14). 28 neonates died (near infrared spectroscopy group 12 (4.0%) v control group 16 (5.3%): relative risk 0.75 (0.33 to 1.70).

CONCLUSION

Monitoring of cerebral tissue oxygen saturation in combination with dedicated interventions in preterm neonates (<32 weeks' gestation) during immediate transition and resuscitation after birth did not result in substantially higher survival without cerebral injury compared with standard care alone. Survival without cerebral injury increased by 4.3% but was not statistically significant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03166722.

Weekend delivery and maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies in the United States: A population-based analysis of 3-million live births

BACKGROUND

Childbirth is the most common cause of hospital admission in the United States. Previous studies have shown that there might be a "weekend effect" in perinatal care, indicating that mothers and newborns whose deliveries occur during the weekends are at increased risk of having adverse outcomes. This study aims to isolate the association between the weekend delivery and maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes by investigating low-risk pregnancies in nationwide data.

METHODS

A population-based study of all low-risk pregnancies (in-hospital, nonanomalous, term, normal birthweight, and singleton) was conducted based on US national natality data in 2017. Four maternal outcomes (ICU admission, uterine rupture, blood transfusion, and perineal laceration) and three neonatal outcomes (5-minute Apgar <7, NICU admission, and neonatal death) were defined as adverse outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association, adjusting for 23 maternal and neonatal characteristics and risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 3 011 577 low-risk pregnancies, 6.0% were reported to have at least one of the maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes. Weekend deliveries were significantly associated with six maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes with an exception of neonatal death. In general, weekend deliveries were 1.13 times significantly as likely to have any of seven maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes than weekday deliveries (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11-1.14), being attributed to adverse outcomes of more than 4500 mother-newborn pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekend delivery is a consistent risk factor for both mothers and babies at the national level. Furthermore, studies are needed about possible modifiable factors that mediate these associations to ensure safe childbirth regardless of the day of delivery.

Birth during off-hours: Impact of time of birth, staff´s seniority, and unit volume on maternal adverse outcomes-a population-based cross-sectional study of 87 065 deliveries

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate whether time of birth, unit volume, and staff seniority impact the incidence of maternal complications in deliveries ≥34 + 0 gestational weeks.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of 87 065 deliveries occurring between 2004 and 2015 in ten public hospitals in Styria, Austria. A composite adverse maternal outcome measure of uterine atony, postpartum hysterectomy, postpartum bleeding, impaired wound healing, postpartum infections requiring antibiotic treatment, sepsis, or maternal death was used to compare outcomes by time of birth, unit volume, and staff seniority. Based on delivery data, generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to calculate the risk of maternal adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Maternal adverse events occurred in 1.33% of deliveries. Incidence of maternal adverse events was highest for units with >1000 deliveries (adjusted OR 1.40; CI 95%: 1.16-1.69) and higher for perinatal centers (adjusted OR 1.35; CI 95%: 1.15-1.57) compared with reference units (500-1000 deliveries/year). Delivery during the daytime compared with the afternoon and nighttime did not affect the incidence of maternal complications (P = 0.765 and P = 0.136, respectively). Compared with resident-guided deliveries, the odds ratio for an adverse event was the same when a consultant attended the delivery (adjusted OR 1.13; CI 95%: 0.98-1.30) but lower in deliveries managed by midwives only (adjusted OR 0.21; CI 95%: 0.07-0.64).

CONCLUSION

Procedures performed during the night shift were not associated with increased complication rates. Delivery volume and high-volume centers were associated with the highest risk of maternal complications, and units with 500-1000 deliveries per year were the lowest. With increasing odds of pregnancy risks, these results change, and delivering in a high-volume center becomes at least as safe as delivering in a smaller unit.

Exposure to night-time light pollution and risk of prolonged duration of labor: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Light pollution (LP) is a ubiquitous environmental agent that affects more than 80% of the world's population. This large nationwide cohort study evaluates whether exposure to LP can influence obstetric outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed Austrian birth registry data on 717 113 cases between 2008 and 2016 and excluded cases involving day-time delivery, <23 + 0 gestational weeks, and/or birthweight <500 g, induction of labor, elective cesarean, or cases with missing data. The independent variable, that is, degree of night-time LP, was categorized as low (0.174 to <0.688 mcd/m² ), medium (0.688 to <3 mcd/m² ), or high (3 to <10 mcd/m² ). Duration of labor and adverse neonatal outcomes served as outcome measures.

RESULTS

Cases in regions with high LP (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.57) and medium LP (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.31) showed increased odds of prolonged labor (P < .0001 each). Newborns born in regions with high LP (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07-1.16) and medium LP (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10) showed increased odds of experiencing adverse outcomes (P < .0001 each). Preterm delivery <28 + 0 weeks was also associated with the degree of LP (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Night-time LP negatively interferes with obstetric outcomes. The perceived influence of LP as an environmental agent needs to be re-evaluated to minimize associated health risks.

Assessment of temporal variations in adherence to NRP using video recording in the delivery room

Introduction

Video recording and video evaluation tools have been successfully used to evaluate neonatal resuscitation performance. The objective of our study was to evaluate differences in Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) adherence at time of birth between three temporal resuscitative periods using scored video recordings.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of in-situ resuscitation video recordings from a level 3 perinatal center between 2017 and 2018. The modified Neonatal Resuscitation Assessment (mNRA) scoring tool was used as a surrogate marker to assess NRP adherence during daytime, evening, and nighttime hours.

Results

A total of 260 resuscitations, of which 258 were births via Cesarean section, were assessed. mNRA composite scores were 86.2% during daytime hours, 87% during evening hours, and 86.6% during nighttime hours. There were no significant differences in mNRA composite scores between any of the three time periods. Differences remained statistically similar after controlling for complexity of resuscitations with administration of positive pressure ventilation (PPV), intubation, or chest compressions.

Conclusion

Overall adherence to NRP, as measured by composite mNRA scores as a surrogate marker, was high across all three daily resuscitative periods without significant differences between daytime, evening, and nighttime hours.

Association between time of delivery and composite adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders

INTRODUCTION

A potential manner to lower the morbidity with the hypertensive disoreders of pregancy is to explore the time of day of delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare composite neonatal adverse outcomes among term women with hypertensive disorders.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study used the U.S. vital statistics dataset from 2013 to 2017. Time of delivery was categorized into three shifts. The primary outcome was composite neonatal adverse outcome..

RESULTS

Compared to neonates delivered at the first shift, the risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was higher at the third shift (aRR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.13-1.25).

CONCLUSION

the risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome is higher if the delivery occurs at the third (23:00-7:00) shift.

Factors associated with appropriate treatment of acute-onset severe obstetrical hypertension

BACKGROUND

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that pregnant patients receive expeditious treatment with first-line antihypertensive agents within 1 hour of confirmed severe hypertension to reduce the risk for maternal stroke. However, it is unknown how often this guideline is followed and what factors influence a patient's likelihood of receiving guideline-concordant care.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify factors associated with receiving guideline-concordant treatment for an obstetrical hypertensive emergency.

STUDY DESIGN

We present a case-control study of all pregnant and postpartum patients who had persistent severe hypertension (≥2 systolic blood pressures ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg, or both within 1 hour of each other) during their delivery hospitalization at a tertiary hospital from October 1, 2013, to August 31, 2020. Data were extracted from the hospital electronic medical records using standard definitions and billing and diagnosis codes. We defined receipt of the recommended treatment as administration of a first-line antihypertensive agent (intravenous labetalol, intravenous hydralazine, or immediate-release oral nifedipine) within 60 minutes of the first or second severe-range blood pressure measurement during their delivery hospitalization. Delayed treatment was defined as the administration of a first-line agent >60 minutes after the second elevated blood pressure measurement. Patients were considered untreated if a first-line agent was never administered. Maternal sociodemographic, clinical and pregnancy factors, and time and day of the week of the hypertensive emergency were compared among patients who received the recommended treatment, those who received delayed treatment, and those who were untreated. Bivariate analyses were performed, and multinomial and multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 39,918 deliveries in the cohort, 1987 (5.0%) were complicated by severe, persistent obstetrical hypertension. Of these patients, 532 (26.8%) received the recommended treatment, 356 (17.9%) received delayed treatment, and 1099 (55.3%) did not receive any first-line antihypertensive therapy. The multinomial regression models that were used to compare these 3 groups indicated that patients who received the recommended treatment were more likely to be Black (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.51), Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.52), or pregnant and at <37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 6.65; 95% confidence interval, 5.08-8.72). Treatment was less likely if the severe obstetrical hypertension emergency occurred overnight (7:00 PM to 6:59 AM) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.97) or during the postpartum period (adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.86).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of obstetrical patients with at least 2 documented severely elevated blood pressure measurements did not receive the recommended antihypertensive treatment. Of those who did receive treatment, about 40% had delayed treatment. Black and Hispanic race and preterm gestation were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving the recommended treatment when compared with White race and term pregnancies. Patients whose severe obstetrical hypertension emergency occurred overnight and those who were postpartum were less likely to receive any first-line antihypertensive treatment. Overall, patients without sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for severe obstetrical hypertension or other pregnancy complications were less likely to be treated. However, treatment improved significantly over time with the implementation of targeted quality measures and specific institutional policies based on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' latest severe obstetrical hypertension management guidelines.

Association between time of delivery and composite adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diabetes

OBJECTIVES

To compare the composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes among women with diabetes who labor and deliver at 37-41 weeks at distinct time shifts.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study using the US Vital Statistics dataset on Period Linked Birth-Infant Death Data from 2013-2017. The study population was restricted to non-anomalous singleton live births from women with pregestational or gestational diabetes, who labored and delivered at 37 0/7 to 41 6/7 weeks of gestation. The time of delivery was categorized as the first shift (7:00-15:00), the second shift (15:00-23:00), and the third shift (23:00-7:00). The primary outcome was a composite neonatal adverse outcome; the secondary outcome was a composite maternal adverse outcome. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between the time of delivery and adverse outcomes (using adjusted relative risk [aRR] and 95% CI).

RESULTS

Of 19.8 million live births during the study period, 3.3% (643,610) met the study inclusion criteria. The overall rate of composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes were 9.62 and 3.63 per 1000 live births, respectively. Multivariable adjusted regression analysis showed that, compared to newborns delivered at the first shift, the risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was modestly but significantly higher (aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.27) in the third shift (23:00-7:00). There was no significant difference in the risk of composite maternal adverse outcomes between time shifts. In the sensitivity analysis stratified by the day of the week (weekday vs weekend), the results were consistent with the primary analyses.

CONCLUSION

Among term pregnancies complicated by diabetes, compared with delivery at 7:00-15:00, the risk of a composite neonatal adverse outcome is marginally but significantly higher if delivery occurs at the third shift (23:00-7:00).

Creating a model to predict time intervals from induction of labor to induction of anesthesia and delivery to coordinate workload

BACKGROUND

Induction of labor continues to become more common. We analyzed induction of labor and timing of obstetric and anesthesia work to create a model to predict the induction-anesthesia interval and the induction-delivery interval in order to co-ordinate workload to occur when staff are most available.

METHODS

Patients who underwent induction of labor at a single medical center were identified and multivariable linear regression was used to model anesthesia and delivery times. Data were collected on date of birth, race/ethnicity, body mass index, gestational age, gravidity, parity, indication for labor induction, number of prior deliveries, time of induction, induction agent, cervical dilation, effacement, and fetal station on admission, date and time of anesthesia administration, date and time of delivery, and delivery type.

RESULTS

A total of 1746 women met inclusion criteria. Associations which significantly influenced time from induction of labor to anesthesia and delivery included maternal age (anesthesia P <0.001, delivery P =0.002), body mass index (both P <0.001), prior vaginal delivery (both P <0.001), gestational age (anesthesia P <0.001, delivery P <0.018), simplified Bishop score (both P <0.001), and first induction agent (both P <0.001). Induction of labor of nulliparous women at 02:00 h and parous women at 04:00 or 05:00 h had the highest estimated probability of the mother having her first anesthesia encounter and delivering during optimally staffed hours when our institution's specialty personnel are most available.

CONCLUSIONS

Time to obstetric and anesthesia tasks can be estimated to optimize induction of labor start times, and shift anesthesia and delivery workload to hours when staff are most available.

Decision-to-delivery interval of emergency cesarean section in Uganda: a retrospective cohort study

Background

In many low and medium human development index countries, the rate of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is high. One factor which may influence this is the decision-to-delivery interval of emergency cesarean section. We aimed to investigate the maternal risk factors, indications and decision-to-delivery interval of emergency cesarean section in a large, under-resourced obstetric setting in Uganda.

Methods

Records of 344 singleton pregnancies delivered at ≥24 weeks throughout June 2017 at Mulago National Referral Hospital were analysed using Cox proportional hazards models and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

An emergency cesarean section was performed every 104 min and the median decision-to-delivery interval was 5.5 h. Longer interval was associated with preeclampsia and premature rupture of membranes/oligohydramnios. Fetal distress was associated with a shorter interval (p < 0.001). There was no association between decision-to-delivery interval and adverse perinatal outcomes (p > 0.05). Mothers waited on average 6 h longer for deliveries between 00:00–08:00 compared to those between 12:00–20:00 (p < 0.01). The risk of perinatal death was higher in neonates where the decision to deliver was made between 20:00–02:00 compared to 08:00–12:00 (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

In this setting, the average decision-to-delivery interval is longer than targets adopted in high development index countries. Decision-to-delivery interval varies diurnally, with decisions and deliveries made at night carrying a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This suggests a need for targeting the improvement of service provision overnight.

Working-hour phenomenon in obstetrics is an attainable target to improve neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

Giving birth in a health care facility does not guarantee high-quality care or favorable outcomes. The working-hour phenomenon describes adverse outcomes of institutional births outside regular working hours.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to evaluate whether the time of birth is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes and to identify the riskiest time periods for obstetrical care.

STUDY DESIGN

This nationwide retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2008 to 2016 from all 82 obstetric departments in Austria. Births at ≥ 23+0 gestational weeks with ≥500 g birthweight were included. Independent variables were categorized by the time of day vs night as core time (morning, day) and off hours (evening, nighttime periods 1-4). The composite primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome, defined as arterial umbilical cord blood pH <7.2, 5 minute Apgar score <7, and/or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a model to predict these adverse neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 462,947 births, 227,672 (49.2%) occurred during off hours and had a comparable distribution in all maternity units, regardless of volume (<500 births per year: 50.3% during core time vs 49.7% during off hours; ≥500 births per year: 50.7% core time vs 49.3% off hours; perinatal tertiary center: 51.2% core time vs 48.8% off hours). Furthermore, most women (35.8-35.9%) gave birth between 2:00 and 5:59 am (night periods 3 and 4). After adjustment for covariates, we found that adverse neonatal outcomes also occurred more frequently during these night periods 3 and 4, in addition to the early morning period (night 3: odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.08; P < .001; night 4: odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.10; P < .001; early morning period: odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.08; P < .001). The adjusted odds for adverse outcomes were lowest for births between 6:00 and 7:59 pm (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.99; P = .006).

CONCLUSION

There is an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes when giving birth between 2:00 and 7:59 am. The so-called working-hour phenomenon is an attainable target to improve neonatal outcomes. Health care providers should ensure an optimal organizational framework during this time period.

Daytime Compared With Nighttime Differences in Management and Outcomes of Postpartum Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether postpartum hemorrhage management or subsequent morbidity differs based on whether delivery occurred during the day or night.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational obstetric cohort of more than 115,000 mother-neonate pairs from 25 hospitals (2008-2011). This analysis included women delivering singleton or twin births who experienced postpartum hemorrhage (estimated blood loss greater than 500 cc for vaginal delivery, estimated blood loss greater than 1,000 cc for cesarean delivery, or documented treatment for postpartum hemorrhage). Nighttime delivery was defined as that occurring between 8 PM and 6 AM. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity (death, hysterectomy, intensive care unit admission, transfusion, or unanticipated procedure for bleeding). Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, uterotonic use, and procedures to treat bleeding that occurred during the postpartum hospitalization. Multivariable logistic, linear, quantile, and multinomial regression models were used to assess associations between nighttime delivery and outcomes, adjusting for potential patient-level confounders and hospital as a fixed effect.

RESULTS

In total, 2,709 (34.2%) of 7,917 women with postpartum hemorrhage delivered at night. Women who delivered at night were younger, had a lower body mass index, and were more likely to have government-sponsored insurance, be nulliparous, have hypertension, use neuraxial analgesia, and deliver vaginally. After adjusting for potential confounders, the primary composite outcome of maternal morbidity was similar regardless of night compared with day delivery (15.5% night vs 17.5% day; adjusted odds ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03). Some secondary outcomes, including mean EBL, frequency of uterotonic use, and time from delivery to first uterotonic dose, differed on unadjusted analyses, but these associations did not persist in multivariable analysis. The study had limited power to assess differences in uncommon outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Nighttime delivery was not associated with significant differences in postpartum hemorrhage-related management or morbidity.