1
|
Bernier E, Simoneau C, Desroches S, Morisset AS, Robitaille J. Implementation of Postpartum Nutritional Interventions in Healthcare, Community and eHealth: A Systematic Review. Matern Child Health J 2024; 28:1897-1910. [PMID: 39292385 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-024-03985-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The efficacy of interventions targeting lifestyle habits, particularly dietary habits, among postpartum women is well established. However, whether these results can be translated into tangible changes in the care and services provided to this population remains unclear. Therefore, the aim is to examine the implementation outcomes of postpartum nutritional interventions delivered in healthcare, community, or eHealth settings. METHODS A search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases in July 2024, to identify all relevant studies. Included studies had to report at least 1 of the 8 implementation outcomes studied: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, implementation cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Descriptive analysis of reported outcomes was performed. PROSPERO ID CRD42022351411. RESULTS Of the 8907 unique studies identified, 26 interventions (24 publications) were included.There was a great heterogeneity among interventions studied and implementation outcomes reported. Acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity were the most studied implementation outcomes. Overall, postpartum nutritional interventions were found to be acceptable and useful, but improvements were suggested by participants, such as more frequent contacts and longer programs. Recruitment, retention, participation, and penetration rates widely varied across studies. Challenges hindering the delivery of nutritional interventions were reported by participants, such as lack of time and the presence of medical conditions following delivery. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review demonstrates the potential for the delivery and implementation of nutritional interventions in real-world settings during the postpartum period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Bernier
- École de nutrition, Université Laval, 2425, rue de l'Agriculture, local 1122, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
- Centre de recherche Nutrition Santé et Société (NUTRISS) de l'Institut sur la nutrition et des aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Axe Endocrinologie et Néphrologie, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Charlotte Simoneau
- École de nutrition, Université Laval, 2425, rue de l'Agriculture, local 1122, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
- Centre de recherche Nutrition Santé et Société (NUTRISS) de l'Institut sur la nutrition et des aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Sophie Desroches
- École de nutrition, Université Laval, 2425, rue de l'Agriculture, local 1122, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
- Centre de recherche Nutrition Santé et Société (NUTRISS) de l'Institut sur la nutrition et des aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Anne-Sophie Morisset
- École de nutrition, Université Laval, 2425, rue de l'Agriculture, local 1122, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
- Centre de recherche Nutrition Santé et Société (NUTRISS) de l'Institut sur la nutrition et des aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Axe Endocrinologie et Néphrologie, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Julie Robitaille
- École de nutrition, Université Laval, 2425, rue de l'Agriculture, local 1122, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
- Centre de recherche Nutrition Santé et Société (NUTRISS) de l'Institut sur la nutrition et des aliments fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
- Axe Endocrinologie et Néphrologie, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kemp BJ, Kelly B, Cupples G, Fleck O, McAuley E, Creighton RM, Wallace H, Graham U, Mulligan C, Kennedy A, Patterson CC, McCance DR. A Pregnancy and Postnatal RCT Among Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Overweight/Obesity: The PAIGE2 Study. J Endocr Soc 2024; 8:bvae151. [PMID: 39290335 PMCID: PMC11406749 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvae151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study examined the influence of a pregnancy and postnatal multicomponent lifestyle intervention for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and overweight/obesity from 6 weeks to 12 months postnatal. The primary outcome was weight at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included change in body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Methods The study involved 235 pregnant women with GDM and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 during pregnancy. Intervention components included an educational session, activity tracker (Fitbit), monthly phone calls, weekly motivational text messages, 12-week voucher for a commercial weight management organization and anthropometric, biochemical, and clinical measurements taken at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postnatal. The control group received routine local maternity care. Results A mean weight change of -2.0 (SD 7.1) kg was observed in the intervention group compared with -0.6 (SD 8.0) kg in the control group, difference -1.4 (95% CI -4.4, 1.5) kg from 6 weeks to 12 months postnatal, but this was not statistically significant (P = .34). Neither were significant differences obtained for any secondary outcomes: BMI -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5) kg/m2, WC -1.0 (-5.1, 3.2) cm and FPG 0.07 (-0.15, 0.29) mmol/L. Conclusion This lifestyle intervention among women with overweight/obesity and GDM resulted in a statistically nonsignificant 1.4 kg greater weight loss compared with routine care at 12 months postnatal. Further research is needed to understand how the different components of this lifestyle intervention might be better applied to elicit more successful results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridie J Kemp
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Bronagh Kelly
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Georgina Cupples
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Olwen Fleck
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Emma McAuley
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Rachel M Creighton
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Helen Wallace
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Una Graham
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - Ciara Mulligan
- Diabetes & Endocrinology, Ulster Hospital, South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT16 1RH, UK
| | - Adele Kennedy
- Endocrine and Diabetes, Antrim Area Hospital, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim BT41 2RL, UK
| | - Chris C Patterson
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| | - David R McCance
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gavine A, Farre A, Lynn F, Shinwell S, Buchanan P, Marshall J, Cumming S, Wallace L, Wade A, Ahern E, Hay L, Cranwell M, McFadden A. Lessons for the UK on implementation and evaluation of breastfeeding support: evidence syntheses and stakeholder engagement. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-206. [PMID: 39054917 DOI: 10.3310/dgtp5702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Background Breastfeeding impacts positively on multiple health outcomes, but < 50% of UK women breastfeed at 8 weeks. Women with long-term conditions face additional challenges in breastfeeding. Objectives To synthesise global and UK evidence to co-create an implementation and evaluation toolkit for cost-effective breastfeeding support in the NHS. Design Evidence syntheses with stakeholder engagement. Review methods Systematic reviews examined effectiveness of breastfeeding support for (1) healthy women and (2) women with long-term conditions using Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group methods. Mixed-methods systematic reviews synthesised process evaluations of effective breastfeeding support interventions for healthy women and experiences of receiving/providing support for breastfeeding women with long-term conditions. Cross-study synthesis integrated qualitative and quantitative findings. Systematic reviews synthesised evidence on the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of breastfeeding support following National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. All searches were conducted from May 2021 to October 2022. Stakeholder engagement and toolkit development comprised online discussions, a modified Delphi study, focus groups and four workshops. Participants were 23 stakeholders, 16 parents in the parents' panels, 15 women in the focus groups and 87 stakeholders who attended the workshops. Results We found considerably more interventions designed for healthy women (review 1) than aimed at women with long-term conditions (reviews 1 and 4); approximately half of the studies were targeted at groups at higher risk of poor breastfeeding outcomes, and the impact of support may be different in these populations. Despite this, studies from review 2 found that women perceived the provision of support as positive, important and needed. Studies from review 5 echoed a range of suggestions from participants regarding potential strategies to improve breastfeeding support, with the most widely reported being the need to acknowledge the role and influence of other sources of support (e.g. partners, family, friends, peers, external professionals, web-based resources) and involving these sources in the provision of breastfeeding support for women with long-term conditions. In reviews 3 and 6, there was uncertainty about the cost-effectiveness of breastfeeding support interventions due to the limited number of studies and lack of good-quality evidence. Limitations There was a lack of evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of breastfeeding interventions in the UK. There was often insufficient information reported about intervention characteristics. Conclusions 'Breastfeeding only' support probably reduces the number of women stopping any or exclusive breastfeeding. The evidence for 'breastfeeding plus' interventions is less consistent, but these may reduce the number of women stopping exclusive breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks and at 6 months. We found no evidence of differential intervention effects regarding mode of provision or provider. Cost-effectiveness is uncertain due to the lack of good-quality evidence. Key enablers of successful implementation were responsiveness and tailoring of interventions to both women's and supporters' needs. Breastfeeding support as delivered in the included studies probably has little to no effect on breastfeeding outcomes for women with long-term conditions. The mixed-methods synthesis and stakeholder work identified that existing interventions may not address the complex needs of these women. The main study output is a co-produced toolkit to guide implementation and evaluation of breastfeeding support services in the UK. Future work Evaluation of breastfeeding support for all women, particularly those at risk of poor breastfeeding outcomes (e.g. long-term conditions, deprivation). This could involve tailoring the toolkit to local contexts via implementation and effectiveness studies or using quality improvement studies. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42022337239, CRD42021229769 and CRD42022374509. The reviews of economic evidence were not registered; however, the review protocol can be accessed via the repository held by Queen's University Belfast Research Portal (https://pure.qub.ac.uk/). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130995) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 20. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gavine
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Albert Farre
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Fiona Lynn
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Shona Shinwell
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Joyce Marshall
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Sara Cumming
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Louise Wallace
- School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Angie Wade
- Population, Policy and Practice, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Elayne Ahern
- Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Ireland
| | - Laura Hay
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kemp BJ, Creighton RM, Cupples G, Kelly B, McAuley E, Fleck O, Wallace H, Graham U, McCance DR. Mothers' experiences of a lifestyle intervention for weight reduction 12 months after gestational diabetes mellitus: Qualitative findings from the PAIGE2 study. Midwifery 2024; 129:103911. [PMID: 38141456 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
The standardised pooled prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) globally is approximately 14 %, a reflection of increasing rates of obesity in women of childbearing age. Lifestyle interventions to reduce GDM and subsequent type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been deemed a research priority but are challenging to perform and have variable success rates. The PAIGE2 study was a pragmatic lifestyle randomised controlled trial for women with GDM and body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, which began during pregnancy and continued for one year postnatally. The primary outcome was weight loss 12 months postnatally compared with mothers receiving standard maternity care. Qualitative results are presented from end of study focus groups conducted amongst intervention mothers to gather feedback and determine acceptability of the PAIGE2 intervention. In total, 19 mothers participated in five virtual focus groups. Content analysis explored general study experience, longer term changes to lifestyle and suggested improvements of intervention components including monthly phone calls, motivational text messages, Fitbit experience, Slimming World, and study contact timings. Overall, most mothers found the individual PAIGE2 intervention components enjoyable, although opinions differed as to which were the most effective. Several mothers claimed the intervention helped them make long-term changes to their behaviours. A common suggested improvement was the establishment of a local group where mothers could share their experiences. In conclusion, most mothers deemed the intervention acceptable, and felt that with minor enhancements, it could be utilised as an effective tool to support weight loss after pregnancy and reduce future risk of obesity and T2D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridie J Kemp
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Rachel M Creighton
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Gina Cupples
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Bronagh Kelly
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Emma McAuley
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Olwen Fleck
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Helen Wallace
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Una Graham
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - David R McCance
- Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Jubilee Maternity Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kumari A, Ranjan P, Vikram NK, Kaur D, Balsarkar G, Malhotra A, Puri M, Batra A, Madan J, Tyagi S, Guleria K, Dabral A, Sarkar S, Nigam A, Anwar W, Kamath S, Bhatla N, Kumari SS, Kumar R, Choranur A, Venkataraman S, Kaur T, Rathore AM, Kaloiya GS, Prakash A, Tiwaskar M, Verma A, Singh R, Sharma KA, Baitha U, Tewary K, Misra A, Guleria R. Evidence and consensus-based clinical practice guideline for the management of obesity and overweight in postpartum women: An AIIMS-DST initiative. J Family Med Prim Care 2023; 12:812-855. [PMID: 37448937 PMCID: PMC10336934 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_45_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Kumari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Piyush Ranjan
- Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Naval K. Vikram
- Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Divjyot Kaur
- Department of Home Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Geetha Balsarkar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seth G. S. Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anita Malhotra
- Department of Home Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Manju Puri
- Director Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LHMC and SSK Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Achla Batra
- President, Association of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Delhi (AOGD), New Delhi, India
- Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Jagmeet Madan
- National President, Indian Dietetic Association, New Delhi, India
| | - Shakun Tyagi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Kiran Guleria
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Anjali Dabral
- Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Siddharth Sarkar
- Department of Psychiatry and NDDTC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Aruna Nigam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Wareesha Anwar
- Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandhya Kamath
- Former Dean, LT Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Former Dean, Seth G. S. Medical College, and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Neerja Bhatla
- Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S. Shantha Kumari
- President, The Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India, India
| | - Raman Kumar
- President, Academy of Family Physicians of India, India
- President, World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA), New Delhi, India
| | | | - Srikumar Venkataraman
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Tanveer Kaur
- Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Asmita Muthal Rathore
- Director Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Gauri Shankar Kaloiya
- Department of Clinical Psychology and NDDTC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Anupam Prakash
- Department of Medicine, LHMC and SSK Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Archana Verma
- Vice President, The Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India, India
| | - Rakhi Singh
- The Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India, India
| | - K Aparna Sharma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Upendra Baitha
- Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kamlesh Tewary
- President, Association of the Physicians of India, India
| | - Anoop Misra
- Chairman, Fortis-C-DOC Centre of Excellence for Diabetes, Metabolic Diseases and Endocrinology, New Delhi, India
- Chairman, National Diabetes, Obesity and Cholesterol Foundation (N-DOC), New Delhi, India
- President, Diabetes Foundation (India) (DFI), New Delhi, India
| | - Randeep Guleria
- Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang X, Zhu C, Liu H, Sun L, Zhu W, Gu C. Retracted: The effects of a midwife-led weight management program for pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2023; 137:104387. [PMID: 36435003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate weight gain during pregnancy may present risks for maternal and newborn health. Pregnancy is considered the optimal time to intervene on women's health behaviors such as eating habits and physical activity. However, current clinical practice guidelines for weight management during pregnancy were not fully based on randomized trials, thus lacking specific "active intervention ingredients" that are proven effective in achieving appropriate gestational weight gain. Therefore it is essential to develop and implement an evidence-based weight management program for pregnant women. OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of a midwife-led weight management program on improving appropriate gestational weight gain, health literacy, experience of antenatal care, and maternal and neonatal outcomes among Chinese pregnant women. DESIGN A two-group randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 426 pregnant women were recruited from a tertiary women's hospital in eastern China. METHODS Participants were randomly allocated to either intervention group (n = 213) or control group (n = 213). Women in the intervention group participated in a midwife-led weight management program during pregnancy, while women in the control group received the conventional obstetrician-led antenatal care. We assessed women at the first antenatal contact, 35-36 weeks gestation and 2-3 days postpartum. Data on gestational weight gain, health literacy, experience of antenatal care, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Dummy variable analysis was conducted to reveal the effect of weight management program on gestational weight gain. RESULTS The overall gestational weight gain between the two groups was not statistically different (t = -1.377, P = 0.170). Compared with women in the control group, the odds of having inappropriate gestational weight gain was lower in the intervention group (OR = 0.270, 95%CI 0.169, 0.431). Further subgroup analyses showed that women in the intervention group had lower risk of inadequate gestational weight gain (OR = 0.305, 95%CI 0.180, 0.515) and excessive gestational weight gain (OR = 0.236, 95%CI 0.138, 0.404) than those in the control group. The score of experience of antenatal care was significantly higher in the midwife-led weight management group than that in the control group (193.70 ± 18.51 versus 165.70 ± 28.23, P < 0.001). Women's health literacy score was higher in the intervention group than control group [74.41 (69.57, 81.77) versus 71.88 (66.23, 77.18), P = 0.004]. CONCLUSION Compared with the conventional antenatal care, the midwife-led weight management program could facilitate appropriate gestational weight gain, enhance health literacy, and promote positive experience of antenatal care for Chinese pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojiao Wang
- Department of Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunxiang Zhu
- Department of Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongyan Liu
- Department of Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China; School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai,China
| | - Liping Sun
- Department of Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenli Zhu
- Department of Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China; School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai,China
| | - Chunyi Gu
- Department of Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kumari A, Ranjan P, Vikram NK, Kaur D, Balsalkar G, Malhotra A, Puri M, Batra A, Madan J, Tyagi S, Guleria K, Dabral A, Sarkar S, Nigam A, Anwar W, Kamath S, Bhatla N, Kumari SS, Kumar R, Choranur A, Venkataraman S, Kaur T, Rathore AM, Kaloiya G, Prakash A, Tiwaskar M, Verma A, Singh R, Sharma KA, Baitha U, Tewary K, Misra A, Guleria R. Executive summary of evidence and consensus-based clinical practice guideline for management of obesity and overweight in postpartum women: An AIIMS-DST initiative. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2022; 16:102425. [PMID: 35248972 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postpartum obesity is a public health concern. There is a need to counsel women about their postpartum weight management, accounting for various barriers they face. Limited literature in the Indian context underscored the need to develop the clinical practice guideline to be used by healthcare providers in Indian healthcare settings. METHODS The guideline was formulated by following the standardised methodology proposed by the National Health and Medical Research Council. Various steps such as identification of the patient population, assembly of the guideline development groups, identification of the key clinical questions, guideline development methods, grading the quality of evidence and recommendations and guideline translation were carried out to develop and validate the clinical practice recommendations. RESULTS The evidence and consensus-based clinical practice guideline has been developed, providing recommendations for key topics of interest for first-line treatment of obesity (lifestyle-related management). Recommendations focus on screening and initiating discussion with overweight and obese postpartum women as well as those who had normal pre-pregnancy body mass index but have retained excessive weight in the postpartum period. Recommendations highlight the evaluation and management of dietary, physical activity and breastfeeding behaviour. Recommendations also account for behavioural modification techniques to improve adherence to the prescribed weight management advice. Duration and frequency of follow-ups as well as the advice to be disseminated have also been discussed in the recommendations. CONCLUSION The guideline provides clinical practice points that can be used by healthcare providers, postpartum women and policymakers for opportunistic screening and management of postpartum obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Kumari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Piyush Ranjan
- Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - Naval K Vikram
- Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Divjyot Kaur
- Department of Home Science, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Geetha Balsalkar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seth G. S. Medical College, Mumbai, India
| | - Anita Malhotra
- Food and Nutrition, Department of Home Science, Vice-principal, Lakshmibai College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Manju Puri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LHMC and SSK Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Achla Batra
- President, Association of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Delhi (AOGD), Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Shakun Tyagi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Kiran Guleria
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Anjali Dabral
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Siddharth Sarkar
- Department of Psychiatry and NDDTC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Aruna Nigam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Wareesha Anwar
- Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandhya Kamath
- Seth G S Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, LT Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Neerja Bhatla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S Shantha Kumari
- The Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India, India
| | - Raman Kumar
- Academy of Family Physicians of India, India
| | - Ambuja Choranur
- President, Indian Menopause Society, Former Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, India
| | - Srikumar Venkataraman
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Tanveer Kaur
- Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Asmita Muthal Rathore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
| | - Gaurishankar Kaloiya
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Anupam Prakash
- Department of Medicine, LHMC and SSK Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Archana Verma
- The Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India, India
| | - Rakhi Singh
- Endocrinology Committee, The Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India, India
| | - K Aparna Sharma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Upendra Baitha
- Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Kamlesh Tewary
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Anoop Misra
- Chairman, Fortis-C-DOC Centre of Excellence for Diabetes, Metabolic Diseases and Endocrinology, Chairman, National Diabetes, Obesity and Cholesterol Foundation (N-DOC) and President, Diabetes Foundation (India), New Delhi, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Timm A, Kragelund Nielsen K, Joenck L, Husted Jensen N, Jensen DM, Norgaard O, Terkildsen Maindal H. Strategies to promote health behaviors in parents with small children-A systematic review and realist synthesis of behavioral interventions. Obes Rev 2022; 23:e13359. [PMID: 34734473 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In this systematic review and realist synthesis, we aimed to identify strategies to improve dietary and physical activity behaviors for parents with small children. A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO in July 2021. Included studies had to: (i) target one or both parents with at least one child (0-3 years), (ii) aim to improve diet and physical activity, and (iii) report on diet and physical activity outcomes. Intervention context, delivery, and outcomes were extracted, and behavior change techniques were coded. A program theory was developed, and context-mechanism-outcome configurations were identified. In total, 17 interventions reported in 28 studies (19 effectiveness studies; nine protocols) were included. Nine interventions showed small improvements: in diet (n = 5), physical activity (n = 2), or both (n = 2) in mothers. The realist synthesis revealed three strategies to improve health behaviors: (1) using knowledge and role modelling to improve family dynamics, (2) providing various home-based activities to change home environment, and (3) offering flexible delivery, for example, phone or website-based to increase social support. Future interventions for parents with small children should consider involving the whole family, focusing on home-based and practical components, and offering various delivery modes. The protocol for the systematic review and realist synthesis was registered in Research Registry (registration ID: reviewregistry860) March 30th, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Timm
- Health Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Larke Joenck
- Health Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark
| | | | - Dorte Moeller Jensen
- Steno Diabetes Center Odense, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ole Norgaard
- Department of Education, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Helle Terkildsen Maindal
- Health Promotion Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Daley AJ, Jolly K, Ives N, Jebb SA, Tearne S, Greenfield SM, Yardley L, Little P, Tyldesley-Marshall N, Bensoussane H, Pritchett RV, Frew E, Parretti HM. Practice nurse-supported weight self-management delivered within the national child immunisation programme for postnatal women: a feasibility cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-130. [PMID: 34382932 DOI: 10.3310/hta25490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy is a high-risk time for excessive weight gain. The rising prevalence of obesity in women, combined with excess weight gain during pregnancy, means that there are more women with obesity in the postnatal period. This can have adverse health consequences for women in later life and increases the health risks during subsequent pregnancies. OBJECTIVE The primary aim was to produce evidence of whether or not a Phase III trial of a brief weight management intervention, in which postnatal women are encouraged by practice nurses as part of the national child immunisation programme to self-monitor their weight and use an online weight management programme, is feasible and acceptable. DESIGN The research involved a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial and two semistructured interview studies with intervention participants and practice nurses who delivered the intervention. Trial data were collected at baseline and 3 months later. The interview studies took place after trial follow-up. SETTING The trial took place in Birmingham, UK. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-eight postnatal women who were overweight/obese were recruited via Birmingham Women's Hospital or general practices. Nine intervention participants and seven nurses were interviewed. INTERVENTIONS The intervention was delivered in the context of the national child immunisation programme. The intervention group were offered brief support that encouraged self-management of weight when they attended their practice to have their child immunised at 2, 3 and 4 months of age. The intervention involved the provision of motivation and support by nurses to encourage participants to make healthier lifestyle choices through self-monitoring of weight and signposting to an online weight management programme. The role of the nurse was to provide regular external accountability for weight loss. Women were asked to weigh themselves weekly and record this on a record card in their child's health record ('red book') or using the online programme. The behavioural goal was for women to lose 0.5-1 kg per week. The usual-care group received a healthy lifestyle leaflet. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the feasibility of a Phase III trial to test the effectiveness of the intervention, as assessed against three traffic-light stop-go criteria (recruitment, adherence to regular self-weighing and registration with an online weight management programme). RESULTS The traffic-light criteria results were red for recruitment (28/80, 35% of target), amber for registration with the online weight loss programme (9/16, 56%) and green for adherence to weekly self-weighing (10/16, 63%). Nurses delivered the intervention with high fidelity. In the qualitative studies, participants indicated that the intervention was acceptable to them and they welcomed receiving support to lose weight at their child immunisation appointments. Although nurses raised some caveats to implementation, they felt that the intervention was easy to deliver and that it would motivate postnatal women to lose weight. LIMITATIONS Fewer participants were recruited than planned. CONCLUSIONS Although women and practice nurses responded well to the intervention and adherence to self-weighing was high, recruitment was challenging and there is scope to improve engagement with the intervention. FUTURE WORK Future research should focus on investigating other methods of recruitment and, thereafter, testing the effectiveness of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12209332. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 49. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Daley
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Natalie Ives
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Susan A Jebb
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Tearne
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sheila M Greenfield
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Hannah Bensoussane
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ruth V Pritchett
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emma Frew
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen M Parretti
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Taylor C, Bhavnani V, Zasada M, Ussher M, Bick D. Barriers and facilitators to uptake and retention of inner-city ethnically diverse women in a postnatal weight management intervention: a mixed-methods process evaluation within a feasibility trial in England. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034747. [PMID: 32699126 PMCID: PMC7375430 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand the barriers and facilitators to uptake and retention of postnatal women randomised to a commercial group weight management intervention using the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation and behaviour) behaviour change model. DESIGN Concurrent mixed-methods (qualitative dominant) process evaluation nested within a feasibility randomised controlled trial, comprising questionnaires and interviews at 6 and 12 months postbirth. SETTING One National Health Service maternity unit in an inner city area in the south of England. PARTICIPANTS 98 postnatal women with body mass indices>25 kg/m2 (overweight/obese) at pregnancy commencement. INTERVENTION Twelve-week Slimming World (SW) commercial group weight management programme, commencing anytime from 8 to 16 weeks postnatally. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Data regarding uptake and retention from questionnaires and interviews conducted 6 and 12 months postbirth analysed thematically and mapped to the COM-B model. RESULTS Barriers to SW uptake mostly concerned opportunity issues (eg, lack of time or childcare support) though some women also lacked motivation, not feeling that weight reduction was a priority, and a few cited capability issues such as lacking confidence. Weight loss aspirations were also a key factor explaining retention, as were social opportunity issues, particularly in relation to factors such as the extent of group identity and relationship with the group consultant; and physical opportunity such as perceived support from and fit with family lifestyle. In addition, barriers relating to beliefs and expectations about the SW programme were identified, including concerns regarding compatibility with breastfeeding and importance of exercise. Women's understanding of the SW approach, and capability to implement into their lifestyles, appeared related to level of attendance (dose-response effect). CONCLUSIONS Uptake and retention in commercial weight management programmes may be enhanced by applying behaviour change techniques to address the barriers impacting on women's perceived capability, motivation and opportunity to participate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN39186148.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cath Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK
- Institute of Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Debra Bick
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bick D, Taylor C, Bhavnani V, Healey A, Seed P, Roberts S, Zasada M, Avery A, Craig V, Khazaezadah N, McMullen S, O’Connor S, Oki B, Oteng-Ntim E, Poston L, Ussher M. Lifestyle information and access to a commercial weight management group to promote maternal postnatal weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour: the SWAN feasibility RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/phr08090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Increasing numbers of UK women have overweight or obese body mass index scores when they become pregnant, or gain excessive weight in pregnancy, increasing their risk of adverse outcomes. Failure to manage postnatal weight is linked to smoking, non-healthy dietary choices, lack of regular exercise and poorer longer-term health. Women living in areas of higher social deprivation are more likely to experience weight management problems postnatally.
Objectives
The objectives were to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle information and access to a commercial weight management group focusing on self-monitoring, goal-setting and motivation to achieve dietary change commencing 8–16 weeks postnatally to achieve and maintain weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour.
Design
The design was a randomised two-arm feasibility trial with a nested mixed-methods process evaluation.
Setting
The setting was a single centre in an inner city setting in the south of England.
Participants
Participants were women with body mass index scores of > 25 kg/m2 at antenatal ‘booking’ and women with normal body mass index scores (18.0–24.9 kg/m2) at antenatal booking who developed excessive gestational weight gain as assessed at 36 weeks’ gestation.
Main outcome measures
Recruitment, retention, acceptability of trial processes and identification of relevant economic data were the feasibility objectives. The proposed primary outcome was difference between groups in weight at 12 months postnatally, expressed as percentage weight change and weight loss from antenatal booking. Other proposed outcomes included assessment of diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, body image, maternal esteem, mental health, infant feeding and NHS costs.
Results
Most objectives were achieved. A total of 193 women were recruited, 98 allocated to the intervention arm and 95 to the control arm. High follow-up rates (> 80%) were achieved to 12 months. There was an 8.8% difference in weight loss at 12 months between women allocated to the intervention arm and women allocated to the control arm (13.0% vs. 4.2%, respectively; p = 0.062); 47% of women in the intervention arm attended at least one weight management session, with low risk of contamination between arms. The greatest benefit was among women who attended ≥ 10 sessions. Barriers to attending sessions included capability, opportunity and motivation issues. Data collection tools were appropriate to support economic evaluation in a definitive trial, and economic modelling is feasible to quantify resource impacts and outcomes not directly measurable within a trial.
Limitations
The trial recruited from only one site. It was not possible to recruit women with normal body mass index scores who developed excessive pregnancy weight gain.
Conclusions
It was feasible to recruit and retain women with overweight or obese body mass index scores at antenatal booking to a trial comparing postnatal weight management plus standard care with standard care only and collect relevant data to assess outcomes. Approaches to recruit women with normal body mass index scores who gain excessive gestational weight need to be considered. Commercial weight management groups could support women’s weight management as assessed at 12 months postnatally, with probable greater benefit from attending ≥ 10 sessions. Process evaluation findings highlighted the importance of providing more information about the intervention on trial allocation, extended duration of time to commence sessions following birth and extended number of sessions offered to enhance uptake and retention. Results support the conduct of a future randomised controlled trial.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN39186148.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 8, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra Bick
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Cath Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Andy Healey
- King’s Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Seed
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Roberts
- King’s Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Amanda Avery
- Faculty of Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Bimpe Oki
- Public Health, London Borough of Lambeth, London, UK
| | | | - Lucilla Poston
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bick D, Taylor C, Ussher M. Re: Reconsidering postpartum weight loss counselling interventions. BJOG 2020; 127:1035-1036. [PMID: 32307870 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D Bick
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - C Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - M Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.,Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|