1
|
Erdozain M, Cardil A, de-Miguel S. Fire impacts on the biology of stream ecosystems: A synthesis of current knowledge to guide future research and integrated fire management. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2024; 30:e17389. [PMID: 38984506 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems host disproportionately high biodiversity and provide unique ecosystem services, yet they are being degraded at an alarming rate. Fires, which are becoming increasingly frequent and intense due to global change, can affect these ecosystems in many ways, but this relationship is not fully understood. We conducted a systematic review to characterize the literature on the effects of fires on stream ecosystems and found that (1) abiotic indicators were more commonly investigated than biotic ones, (2) most previous research was conducted in North America and in the temperate evergreen forest biome, (3) following a control-impact (CI) or before-after (BA) design, (4) predominantly assessing wildfires as opposed to prescribed fires, (5) in small headwater streams, and (6) with a focus on structural and not functional biological indicators. After quantitatively analyzing previous research, we detected great variability in responses, with increases, decreases, and no changes being reported for most indicators (e.g., macroinvertebrate richness, fish density, algal biomass, and leaf decomposition). We shed light on these seemingly contradicting results by showing that the presence of extreme hydrological post-fire events, the time lag between fire and sampling, and whether the riparian forest burned or not influenced the outcome of previous research. Results suggest that although wildfires and the following hydrological events can have dramatic impacts in the short term, most biological endpoints recover within 5-10 years, and that detrimental effects are minimal in the case of prescribed fires. We also detected that no effects were more often reported by BACI studies than by CI or BA studies, raising the question of whether this research field may be biased by the inherent limitations of CI and BA designs. Finally, we make recommendations to help advance this field of research and guide future integrated fire management that includes the protection of freshwater ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maitane Erdozain
- Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia, Solsona, Spain
| | - Adrián Cardil
- Forest Science and Technology Centre of Catalonia, Solsona, Spain
- Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences and Engineering, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Technosylva Inc, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Sergio de-Miguel
- Department of Agricultural and Forest Sciences and Engineering, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brinkerhoff CB, Gleason CJ, Kotchen MJ, Kysar DA, Raymond PA. Ephemeral stream water contributions to United States drainage networks. Science 2024; 384:1476-1482. [PMID: 38935727 DOI: 10.1126/science.adg9430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Ephemeral streams flow only in direct response to precipitation and are ubiquitous landscape features. However, little is known about their influence on downstream rivers. Here, we modeled ephemeral stream water contributions to the contiguous United States network of more than 20 million rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, finding that ephemeral streams contribute, on average, 55% of the discharge exported from regional river systems, as defined by the United States Geological Survey. Our results show that ephemeral connectivity is a substantial pathway through which water and associated nutrients and pollution may enter the perennial drainage network and influence water quality. We provide quantitative insight into the implications of differing interpretations of regulatory jurisdiction under the United States Clean Water Act, including the current standard adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig B Brinkerhoff
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Colin J Gleason
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Peter A Raymond
- School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trebitz AS, Herlihy AT. Wetland water quality patterns and anthropogenic pressure associations across the continental USA. WETLANDS (WILMINGTON, N.C.) 2023; 43:1-19. [PMID: 38269080 PMCID: PMC10805235 DOI: 10.1007/s13157-023-01754-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Anthropogenic impacts on lake and stream water quality are well established but have been much less studied in wetlands. Here we use data from the 2016 National Wetland Condition Assessment to characterize water quality and its relationship to anthropogenic pressure for inland wetlands across the conterminous USA. Water samples obtained from 525 inland wetlands spanned pH from <4 to >9 and 3 to 5 orders of magnitude in ionic strength (chloride, sulfate, conductivity), nutrients (total N and P), turbidity, planktonic chlorophyll, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Anthropogenic pressure levels were evaluated at two spatial scales - an adjacent scale scored from field checklists, and a catchment scale indicated by percent agricultural plus urban landcover. Pressure at the two spatial scales were uncorrelated and varied considerably across regions and wetland hydrogeomorphic types. Both adjacent- and catchment-scale pressure were associated with elevated ionic-strength metrics; chloride elevation was most evident in road-salt using states, and sulfate was strongly elevated in a few sites with coal mining nearby. Nutrients were elevated in association with catchment-scale pressure but concomitant changes were not seen in planktonic chlorophyll. Acidic pH and high DOC occurred primarily in upper Great Lakes and eastern seaboard sites having low anthropogenic pressure, suggesting natural organic acid sources. Ionic strength and nutrients increased with increasing catchment-scale pressure even in Flats and closed Depression and Lacustrine sites, which indicates connectivity to rather than isolation from upland anthropogenic landuse even for wetlands lacking inflowing streams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anett S Trebitz
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Duluth MN 55804
| | - Alan T Herlihy
- Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis OR 97331
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leibowitz SG, Hill RA, Creed IF, Compton JE, Golden HE, Weber MH, Rains MC, Jones CE, Lee EH, Christensen JR, Bellmore RA, Lane CR. National hydrologic connectivity classification links wetlands with stream water quality. NATURE WATER 2023; 1:370-380. [PMID: 37389401 PMCID: PMC10302404 DOI: 10.1038/s44221-023-00057-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
Wetland hydrologic connections to downstream waters influence stream water quality. However, no systematic approach for characterizing this connectivity exists. Here using physical principles, we categorized conterminous US freshwater wetlands into four hydrologic connectivity classes based on stream contact and flowpath depth to the nearest stream: riparian, non-riparian shallow, non-riparian mid-depth and non-riparian deep. These classes were heterogeneously distributed over the conterminous United States; for example, riparian dominated the south-eastern and Gulf coasts, while non-riparian deep dominated the Upper Midwest and High Plains. Analysis of a national stream dataset indicated acidification and organic matter brownification increased with connectivity. Eutrophication and sedimentation decreased with wetland area but did not respond to connectivity. This classification advances our mechanistic understanding of wetland influences on water quality nationally and could be applied globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G. Leibowitz
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Pacific Ecological Systems Division (PESD), Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Ryan A. Hill
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Pacific Ecological Systems Division (PESD), Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Irena F. Creed
- Department of Physical and Environmental Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jana E. Compton
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Pacific Ecological Systems Division (PESD), Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Heather E. Golden
- US EPA, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling (CEMM), Watershed and Ecosystem Characterization Division, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Marc H. Weber
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Pacific Ecological Systems Division (PESD), Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Mark C. Rains
- School of Geosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Chas E. Jones
- ORISE Post-doctoral Participant, c/o US EPA, CPHEA, PESD, Corvallis, OR, USA
- Present address: Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians, Portland, OR, USA
| | - E. Henry Lee
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment (CPHEA), Pacific Ecological Systems Division (PESD), Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Jay R. Christensen
- US EPA, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling (CEMM), Watershed and Ecosystem Characterization Division, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Rebecca A. Bellmore
- National Research Council, c/o US EPA, CPHEA, PESD, Corvallis, OR, USA
- Present address: Southeast Alaska Watershed Coalition, Juneau, AK, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beyene MT, Leibowitz SG, Dunn CJ, Bladon KD. To burn or not to burn: An empirical assessment of the impacts of wildfires and prescribed fires on trace element concentrations in Western US streams. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 863:160731. [PMID: 36502971 PMCID: PMC9988007 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
The use of low-severity prescribed fires has been increasingly promoted to reduce the impacts from high-severity wildfires and maintain ecosystem resilience. However, the effects of prescribed fires on water quality have rarely been evaluated relative to the effects of wildfires. In this study, we assessed the effects of 54 wildfires and 11 prescribed fires on trace element (arsenic, selenium, and cadmium) concentrations of streams draining burned watersheds in the western US. To obtain results independent of the choice of method, we employed three independent analytical approaches to evaluate fire effects on water quality for the first three post-fire years. In general, we observed significant increases in trace element concentrations in streams burned by large, high-severity wildfires, despite substantial variability across sites. Comparatively, we did not observe increases in the spring mean concentration of arsenic, selenium, and cadmium in watersheds burned by prescribed fires. Our analysis indicated that the post-fire trace element response in streams was primarily influenced by burn area, burn severity, post-fire weather, surface lithology, watershed physiography, and land cover. This study's results demonstrate that prescribed burns could lessen the post-fire trace element loads in downstream waters if prescribed fires reduce subsequent high severity fires in the landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mussie T Beyene
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Post-doc, c/o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA.
| | - Scott G Leibowitz
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA.
| | - Christopher J Dunn
- Oregon State University, Department of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA.
| | - Kevin D Bladon
- Oregon State University, Department of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Julien A, Melles S. From headwaters to outlets: Bird species accrual curves are faster downstream with different implications for varying landcovers and ecoregions. Front Ecol Evol 2023. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1081230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Terrestrial and aquatic systems are geographically connected, yet these systems are typically studied independently of each other. This approach omits a large amount of ecological information as landscapes are best described as mosaics in watersheds. Species Accumulation Curves (SACs) that incorporate sampling effort are familiar models of how biodiversity will change when landcovers are lost. In land-based systems, the consistent pattern of increased species richness with increasing number of sites sampled is an ecological norm. In freshwater systems, fish species discharge relationships are analogous to species-area relationships in terrestrial systems, but the relationship between terrestrial species and discharge remains largely unexplored. Although some studies investigate the effect of terrestrial systems on neighboring aquatic species, less work has been done on exploring the effect of aquatic systems on terrestrial species. Additionally, creating statistical models to observe these interactions need to be explored further. Using data from the Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas (2001–2005), we created bird SACs to explore how increases in diversity with sites sampled varies with watershed position on the Canadian side of the Great Lakes Basin (GLB). The mosaic landscape of the GLB was characterized using six majority land cover classes at a 15 m resolution. This work shows that rates of species accrual and potential maximum species richness vary as a function of watershed position, underlying land cover, and the Ecoregion in which sampling was performed. We also found that Urban landcover has the potential to retain relatively high levels of species richness, which is further modified by Ecoregion and watershed position. Through our ‘world building,’ we believe that we can increase knowledge around the importance of land-water interactions and further the goals of viewing landscapes as mosaic watersheds.
Collapse
|
7
|
Vayghan AH, Rasta M, Zakeri M, Kelly FJ. Spatial distribution of microplastics pollution in sediments and surface waters of the Aras River and reservoir: An international river in Northwestern Iran. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 843:156894. [PMID: 35777571 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) in freshwater environments have been recognized as one of the important sources of plastic contamination in marine ecosystems. Reducing the amount and spatial distribution of MPs reaching the sea through accumulation behind dams remains unclear. In this study we analyzed the spatial distribution of sediment and surface water MPs in the Aras Dam and from nineteen upstream and downstream locations of the Dam in the Aras River. The MPs abundance ranged from 32 to 528 items/kg dry weight (mean 217.8 ± 132.6) and 1 to 43 items/m3 (mean 12.8 ± 10.5) in the sediment and surface water stations, respectively. MPs abundance in surface waters collected within the Dam reservoir was significantly higher than those found either upstream or downstream (P < 0.05). For sediments, reservoir MPs concentration was generally higher than upstream and downstream, although their differences were not significant. High MPs concentration was observed in the vicinity of urban areas. Moreover, MPs abundance was positively correlated with total organic carbon (TOC) and clay content (P < 0.01). GAM analysis revealed that clay is the most important variable with lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) and explained 61.3 % of deviance (R-sq.(adj) = 0.344) in MPs abundance. MP particles ranged from 0.1 to 5 mm in size and were dominated by fibers (53.5 %), black color (24 %) and PE polymer (36.6 %). Our results highlight the high MPs distribution in the Aras River and demonstrate that they accumulate in the surface waters behind the Dam. Consequently, the fate and effects of MPs in international rivers is one of the most politicized issues between countries with a common boundary and therefore needs joint management policies that help mitigate this insidious problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Haghi Vayghan
- Department of Ecology & Aquatic Stocks Management, Artemia & Aquaculture Research Institute, Urmia University, P.O. Box: 57179-44514, Urmia, Iran.
| | - Majid Rasta
- Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Sowmehsara, Iran.
| | - Mohammad Zakeri
- Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
| | - Frank J Kelly
- MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saha TK, Pal S, Sarda R. Impact of river flow modification on wetland hydrological and morphological characters. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 29:75769-75789. [PMID: 35655022 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21072-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
A good number of researchers investigated the impact of flow modification on hydrological, ecological, and geomorphological conditions in a river. A few works also focused on hydrological modification on wetland with some parameters but as far the knowledge is concerned, linking river flow modification to wetland hydrological and morphological transformation following an integrated modeling approach is often lacking. The current study aimed to explore the degree of hydrological alteration in the river and its effect on downstream riparian wetlands by adopting advanced modeling approaches. After damming, maximally 67 to 95% hydrological alteration was recorded for maximum, minimum, and average discharges. Wavelet transformation analysis figured out a strong power spectrum after 2012 (damming year). Due to attenuation of flow, the active inundation area was reduced by 66.2%. After damming, 524.03 km2 (48.9% of total pre-dam wetland) was completely obliterated. Hydrological strength (HS) modeling also reported areas under high HS declined by 14% after post-dam condition. Wetland hydrological security state (WSS) and HS matrix, a new approach, are used to explore wetland characteristics of inundation connectivity and hydrological security state. WSS was defined based on lateral hydrological connectivity. HS under critical and stress WWS zones deteriorated in the post-dam period. The morphological transformation was also well recognized showing an increase in area under the patch, edge, and a decrease in the area under the large core area. All these findings established a clear linkage between river flow modification and wetland transformation, and they provided a good clue for managing wetlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamal Kanti Saha
- Department of Geography, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal, 732103, India
| | - Swades Pal
- Department of Geography, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal, 732103, India
| | - Rajesh Sarda
- Department of Geography, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal, 732103, India.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
AbstractWatershed resilience is the ability of a watershed to maintain its characteristic system state while concurrently resisting, adapting to, and reorganizing after hydrological (for example, drought, flooding) or biogeochemical (for example, excessive nutrient) disturbances. Vulnerable waters include non-floodplain wetlands and headwater streams, abundant watershed components representing the most distal extent of the freshwater aquatic network. Vulnerable waters are hydrologically dynamic and biogeochemically reactive aquatic systems, storing, processing, and releasing water and entrained (that is, dissolved and particulate) materials along expanding and contracting aquatic networks. The hydrological and biogeochemical functions emerging from these processes affect the magnitude, frequency, timing, duration, storage, and rate of change of material and energy fluxes among watershed components and to downstream waters, thereby maintaining watershed states and imparting watershed resilience. We present here a conceptual framework for understanding how vulnerable waters confer watershed resilience. We demonstrate how individual and cumulative vulnerable-water modifications (for example, reduced extent, altered connectivity) affect watershed-scale hydrological and biogeochemical disturbance response and recovery, which decreases watershed resilience and can trigger transitions across thresholds to alternative watershed states (for example, states conducive to increased flood frequency or nutrient concentrations). We subsequently describe how resilient watersheds require spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability in hydrological and biogeochemical interactions between terrestrial systems and down-gradient waters, which necessitates attention to the conservation and restoration of vulnerable waters and their downstream connectivity gradients. To conclude, we provide actionable principles for resilient watersheds and articulate research needs to further watershed resilience science and vulnerable-water management.
Collapse
|
10
|
Sediment Yield and Reservoir Sedimentation in Highly Dynamic Watersheds: The Case of Koga Reservoir, Ethiopia. WATER 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/w13233374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Soil erosion is exacerbated by unsustainable land-use activities and poor management practices, undermining reservoir storage capacity. To this effect, appropriate estimation of sediment would help to adopt sustainable land-use activities and best management practices that lead to efficient reservoir operations. This paper aims to investigate the spatial variability of sediment yield, amount of sediment delivery into the reservoir, and reservoir sedimentation in the Koga Reservoir using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Sediment yield and the amount entered into the reservoir were also estimated using a rating curve, providing an alternative approach to spatially referenced SWAT generated suspended sediment load. SWAT was calibrated from 1991 to 2000 and validated from 2002 to 2007 using monthly observations. Model performance indicators showed acceptable values using Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) correlation coefficient (R2), and percent bias (PBIAS) for flow (NSE = 0.75, R2 = 0.78, and PBIAS = 11.83%). There was also good agreement between measured and simulated sediment yields, with NSE, R2, and PBIAS validation values of 0.80, 0.79, and 6.4%, respectively. The measured rating curve and SWAT predictions showed comparable mean annual sediment values of 62,610.08 ton/yr and 58,012.87 ton/yr, respectively. This study provides an implication for the extent of management interventions required to meet sediment load targets to a receiving reservoir, providing a better understanding of catchment processes and responses to anthropogenic and natural stressors in mixed land use temperate climate catchments. Findings would benefit policymakers towards land and water management decisions and serve as a prototype for other catchments where management interventions may be implemented. Specifically, validating SWAT for the Koga Reservoir is a first step to support policymakers, who are faced with implementing land and water management decisions.
Collapse
|
11
|
Erdozain M, Kidd KA, Emilson EJS, Capell SS, Luu T, Kreutzweiser DP, Gray MA. Forest management impacts on stream integrity at varying intensities and spatial scales: Do biological effects accumulate spatially? THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 763:144043. [PMID: 33383512 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The effects of forest harvesting on headwaters are quite well understood, yet our understanding of whether impacts accumulate or dissipate downstream is limited. To address this, we investigated whether several biotic indicators changed from smaller to larger downstream sites (n = 6) within three basins that had intensive, extensive or minimal forest management in New Brunswick (Canada). Biofilm biomass and grazer abundance significantly increased from upstream to downstream, whereas organic matter decomposition and the autotrophic index of biofilms decreased. However, some spatial trends differed among basins and indicated either cumulative (macroinvertebrate abundance, predator density, sculpin GSI) or dissipative (autotrophic index, cotton decomposition) effects downstream, potentially explained by sediment and nutrient dynamics related to harvesting. No such among-basin differences were observed for leaf decomposition, biofilm biomass, macroinvertebrate richness or sculpin condition. Additionally, results suggest that some of the same biological impacts of forestry observed in small headwaters also occurred in larger systems. Although the intensive and extensive basins had lower macroinvertebrate diversity, there were no other signs of biological impairment, suggesting that, overall, current best management practices protect biological integrity downstream despite abiotic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maitane Erdozain
- Canadian Rivers Institute and Biology Department, University of New Brunswick, 100 Tucker Park Road, Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L5, Canada.
| | - Karen A Kidd
- Canadian Rivers Institute and Biology Department, University of New Brunswick, 100 Tucker Park Road, Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L5, Canada; Department of Biology and School of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Erik J S Emilson
- Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St. East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5, Canada
| | - Scott S Capell
- Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St. East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5, Canada
| | - Taylor Luu
- Department of Biology and School of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - David P Kreutzweiser
- Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St. East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5, Canada
| | - Michelle A Gray
- Canadian Rivers Institute and Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, 28 Dineen Drive, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Erdozain M, Kidd KA, Emilson EJS, Capell SS, Kreutzweiser DP, Gray MA. Forest management impacts on stream integrity at varying intensities and spatial scales: Do abiotic effects accumulate spatially? THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2021; 753:141968. [PMID: 32911166 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Though effects of forest harvesting on small streams are well documented, little is known about the cumulative effects in downstream systems. The hierarchical nature and longitudinal connectivity of river networks make them fundamentally cumulative, but lateral and vertical connectivity and instream processes can dissipate the downstream transport of water and materials. To elucidate such effects, we investigated how a suite of abiotic indicators changed from small streams to larger downstream sites (n = 6) within three basins ranging in forest management intensity (intensive, extensive, minimal) in New Brunswick (Canada) in the summer and fall of 2017 and 2018. Inorganic sediments, the inorganic/organic ratios and water temperatures significantly increased longitudinally, whereas nutrients and the fluorescence index of dissolved organic carbon (DOC; indication of terrestrial source) decreased. However, some longitudinal trends differed across basins and indicated downstream cumulative (inorganic sediments, the inorganic/organic ratios and to a lesser extent DOC concentration and humification) as well as dissipative (temperatures, nutrients, organic sediments) effects of forest management. Overall, we found that the effects previously reported for small streams with managed forests also occur at downstream sites and suggest investigating whether different management practices can be used within the extensive basin to reduce these cumulative effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maitane Erdozain
- Canadian Rivers Institute and Biology Department, University of New Brunswick, 100 Tucker Park Road, Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L5, Canada.
| | - Karen A Kidd
- Canadian Rivers Institute and Biology Department, University of New Brunswick, 100 Tucker Park Road, Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L5, Canada; Department of Biology, School of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Erik J S Emilson
- Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St. East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5, Canada
| | - Scott S Capell
- Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St. East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5, Canada
| | - David P Kreutzweiser
- Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St. East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5, Canada
| | - Michelle A Gray
- Canadian Rivers Institute, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, 28 Dineen Drive, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McManus MG, D'Amico E, Smith EM, Polinsky R, Ackerman J, Tyler K. Variation in stream network relationships and geospatial predictions of watershed conductivity. FRESHWATER SCIENCE (PRINT) 2020; 39:1-18. [PMID: 33747635 PMCID: PMC7970528 DOI: 10.1086/710340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Secondary salinization, the increase of anthropogenically-derived salts in freshwaters, threatens freshwater biota and ecosystems, drinking water supplies, and infrastructure. The various anthropogenic sources of salts and their locations in a watershed may result in secondary salinization of river and stream networks through multiple inputs. We developed a watershed predictive assessment to investigate the degree to which topology, land-cover, and land-use covariates affect stream specific conductivity (SC), a measure of salinity. We used spatial stream network models to predict SC throughout an Appalachian stream network in a watershed affected by surface coal mining. During high-discharge conditions, 8 to 44% of stream km in the watershed exceeded the SC benchmark of 300 μS/cm, which is meant to be protective of aquatic life in the Central Appalachian ecoregion. During low-discharge conditions, 96 to 100% of stream km exceeded the benchmark. The 2 different discharge conditions altered the spatial dependency of SC among the stream monitoring sites. During most low discharges, SC was a function of upstream-to-downstream network distances, or flow-connected distances, among the sites. Flow-connected distances are indicative of upstream dependencies affecting stream SC. During high discharge, SC was related to both flow-connected distances and flow-unconnected distances (i.e., distances between sites on different branches of the network). Flow-unconnected distances are indicative of processes on adjacent branches and their catchments affecting stream SC. With sites distributed from headwaters to the watershed outlet, the extent of impacts from secondary salinization could be better spatially predicted and assessed with spatial stream network models than with models assuming spatial independence. Importantly, the assessment also recognized the multi-scale spatial relationships that can occur between the landscape and stream network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G McManus
- Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 USA
| | - Ellen D'Amico
- Pegasus Technical Services c/o United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 USA
| | - Elizabeth M Smith
- Water Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, 61 Forsyth Street Southwest, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 USA
| | - Robyn Polinsky
- Water Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, 61 Forsyth Street Southwest, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 USA
| | - Jerry Ackerman
- Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, 980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605 USA
| | - Kip Tyler
- Water Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, 61 Forsyth Street Southwest, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Climate Drivers and Sources of Sediment and Organic Matter Fluxes in Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams (IRES) of a Subtropical Watershed, USA. CLIMATE 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/cli8100117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Climate-driven hydrological models rarely incorporate intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES) due to monitoring difficulties and their perceived minor effect on river networks. Worldwide, IRES represent approximately 50% of river networks and up to 60% of annual flow and are recognized as conduits and processors of organic matter (OM). Climate induced changes in precipitation and discharge (Q) may impact OM fluxes from IRES. We assessed storm-driven source and flux of total suspended solids (TSS) and OM from small IRES in Mississippi, USA. We used linear Pearson correlations to evaluate relationships between water and storm characteristics (e.g., discharge). Stepwise regression was used to predict change in flux. Dissolved OM was derived from saturated flow through soil whereas particulate OM was derived from channel extension during storms. A power log relationship between Q and materials flux indicated that Q was the driver for flux. A 5% increase in Q within IRES may result in flux increase of 2% TSS and 1.7–2.8% OM. Climate change projections of increased storm intensity over a shorter water year will increase channel extension and soil water transfer resulting in higher material flux to downstream reaches. Climate-driven hydrological models of OM flux should incorporate IRES.
Collapse
|
15
|
Pan Z, Sun Y, Liu Q, Lin C, Sun X, He Q, Zhou K, Lin H. Riverine microplastic pollution matters: A case study in the Zhangjiang River of Southeastern China. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2020; 159:111516. [PMID: 32763563 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Microplastics have pulled the alarm for its far-reaching impacts in the environment and potential risks to human health. Here, we first investigated the microplastic pollution in the Zhangjiang River of southeastern China. Water samples were collected across a river catchment using bulk sampling method. The abundance, distribution, and characteristics of microplastics were analyzed using stereomicroscopy and micro-Raman spectroscopy. The results indicated that microplastic abundance ranged from 50 to 725 items m-3 with an average of 246 items m-3. PP and PE were the major polymers and accounted for ~75%. The dominant shape, color, and size of microplastics are fragment, white, and 0.5-1 mm, respectively. The findings established the baseline information on the microplastic pollution in the Zhangjiang River, which may improve the knowledge of sources of microplastic debris to the local watershed and future evaluation on the role of river catchments in transporting microplastics to the estuary and beyond into the ocean.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong Pan
- Laboratory of Marine Chemistry and Environmental Monitoring Technology, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China; Fujian Provincial Station for Field Observation and Research of Island and Costal Zone in Zhangzhou, Zhangzhou 363216, China; Observation and Research Station of Island and Coastal Ecosystem in the Western Taiwan Strait, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.
| | - Yan Sun
- Laboratory of Marine Chemistry and Environmental Monitoring Technology, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
| | - Qianlong Liu
- College of Ocean and Earth Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
| | - Cai Lin
- Laboratory of Marine Chemistry and Environmental Monitoring Technology, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
| | - Xiuwu Sun
- Laboratory of Marine Chemistry and Environmental Monitoring Technology, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
| | - Qing He
- Laboratory of Marine Chemistry and Environmental Monitoring Technology, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
| | - Kaiwen Zhou
- Laboratory of Marine Chemistry and Environmental Monitoring Technology, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
| | - Hui Lin
- Laboratory of Marine Chemistry and Environmental Monitoring Technology, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Meng B, Liu JL, Bao K, Sun B. Methodologies and Management Framework for Restoration of Wetland Hydrologic Connectivity: A Synthesis. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT 2020; 16:438-451. [PMID: 32100941 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Under the dual influences of high-intensity anthropogenic activity and climate change, wetland hydrologic connectivity (HC) has decreased significantly, resulting in the severe fragmentation of wetlands, a decrease in wetland area, and a degradation of hydrological functions, resulting in a worsening disaster response to floods and droughts. Dynamic changes in wetland HC are affected by a variety of factors. Many degraded wetlands have undergone measures to restore HC. Recovery can improve the HC pattern of degraded wetlands. Based on the knowledge of practitioners and a review of the literature, it was found that recovery measures can be divided into structural recovery and functional recovery according to the specific recovery objectives. However, the current recovery method lacks a holistic analysis of the HC pattern. To this end, we propose a hydrologic network-water balance-based HC recovery and management framework that overcomes the limitations of single-drive-factor repair and local repair effects. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2020;16:438-451. © 2020 SETAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Meng
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Jing-Ling Liu
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Bao
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Sun
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Catchment-Scale Analysis Reveals High Cost-Effectiveness of Wetland Buffer Zones as a Remedy to Non-Point Nutrient Pollution in North-Eastern Poland. WATER 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/w12030629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Large-scale re-establishment of wetland buffer zones (WBZ) along rivers is regarded as an effective measure in order to reduce non-point source nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) pollution in agricultural catchments. We estimated efficiency and costs of a hypothetical establishment of WBZs along all watercourses in an agricultural landscape of the lower Narew River catchment (north-eastern Poland, 16,444 km2, amounting to 5% of Poland) by upscaling results obtained in five sub-catchments (1087 km2). Two scenarios were analysed, with either rewetting selected wetland polygons that collect water from larger areas (polygonal WBZs) or reshaping and rewetting banks of rivers (linear WBZs), both considered in all ecologically suitable locations along rivers. Cost calculation included engineering works necessary in order to establish WBZs, costs of land purchase where relevant, and compensation costs of income forgone to farmers (needed only for polygonal WBZs). Polygonal WBZs were estimated in order to remove 11%–30% N and 14%–42% P load from the catchment, whereas linear WBZs were even higher with 33%–82% N and 41%–87% P. Upscaled costs of WBZ establishment for the study area were found to be 8.9 M EUR plus 26.4 M EUR per year (polygonal WBZ scenario) or 170.8 M EUR (linear WBZ scenario). The latter value compares to costs of building about 20 km of an express road. Implementation of buffer zones on a larger scale is thus a question of setting policy priorities rather than financial impossibility.
Collapse
|
18
|
Vanderhoof MK, Christensen JR, Alexander LC. Influence of multi-decadal land use, irrigation practices and climate on riparian corridors across the Upper Missouri River headwaters basin, Montana. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES 2019; 23:4269-4292. [PMID: 33354099 PMCID: PMC7751644 DOI: 10.5194/hess-23-4269-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
The Upper Missouri River headwaters (UMH) basin (36 400 km2) depends on its river corridors to support irrigated agriculture and world-class trout fisheries. We evaluated trends (1984-2016) in riparian wetness, an indicator of the riparian condition, in peak irrigation months (June, July and August) for 158 km2 of riparian area across the basin using the Landsat normalized difference wetness index (NDWI). We found that 8 of the 19 riparian reaches across the basin showed a significant drying trend over this period, including all three basin outlet reaches along the Jefferson, Madison and Gallatin rivers. The influence of upstream climate was quantified using per reach random forest regressions. Much of the interannual variability in the NDWI was explained by climate, especially by drought indices and annual precipitation, but the significant temporal drying trends persisted in the NDWI-climate model residuals, indicating that trends were not entirely attributable to climate. Over the same period we documented a basin-wide shift from 9 % of agriculture irrigated with center-pivot irrigation to 50 % irrigated with center-pivot irrigation. Riparian reaches with a drying trend had a greater increase in the total area with center-pivot irrigation (within reach and upstream from the reach) relative to riparian reaches without such a trend (p < 0.05). The drying trend, however, did not extend to river discharge. Over the same period, stream gages (n = 7) showed a positive correlation with riparian wetness (p < 0.05) but no trend in summer river discharge, suggesting that riparian areas may be more sensitive to changes in irrigation return flows relative to river discharge. Identifying trends in riparian vegetation is a critical precursor for enhancing the resiliency of river systems and associated riparian corridors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie K. Vanderhoof
- Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046, DFC, MS980, Denver, CO 80225, USA
| | - Jay R. Christensen
- National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., MS-642, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA
| | - Laurie C. Alexander
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW (8623-P), Washington, DC 20460, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vanderhoof MK, Lane CR. The potential role of very high-resolution imagery to characterise lake, wetland and stream systems across the Prairie Pothole Region, United States. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING 2019; 40:5768-5798. [PMID: 33408426 PMCID: PMC7784670 DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1582112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/01/2019] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Aquatic features critical to watershed hydrology range widely in size from narrow, shallow streams to large, deep lakes. In this study we evaluated wetland, lake, and river systems across the Prairie Pothole Region to explore where pan-sharpened high-resolution (PSHR) imagery, relative to Landsat imagery, could pro-vide additional data on surface water distribution and movement, missed by Landsat. We used the monthly Global Surface Water (GSW) Landsat product as well as surface water derived from Landsat imagery using a matched filtering algorithm (MF Landsat) to help consider how including partially inundated Landsat pixels as water influenced our findings. The PSHR outputs (and MF Landsat) were able to identify ~60-90% more surface water interactions between waterbodies, relative to the GSW Landsat product. However, regardless of Landsat source, by doc-umenting many smaller (<0.2 ha), inundated wetlands, the PSHR outputs modified our interpretation of wetland size distribution across the Prairie Pothole Region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie K Vanderhoof
- U.S. Geological Survey, Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Charles R Lane
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lane CR, Leibowitz SG, Autrey BC, LeDuc SD, Alexander LC. HYDROLOGICAL, PHYSICAL, AND CHEMICAL FUNCTIONS AND CONNECTIVITY OF NON-FLOODPLAIN WETLANDS TO DOWNSTREAM WATERS: A REVIEW. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 2018; 54:346-371. [PMID: 34887654 PMCID: PMC8654163 DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
We reviewed the scientific literature on non-floodplain wetlands (NFWs), freshwater wetlands typically located distal to riparian and floodplain systems, to determine hydrological, physical, and chemical functioning and stream and river network connectivity. We assayed the literature for source, sink, lag, and transformation functions, as well as factors affecting connectivity. We determined NFWs are important landscape components, hydrologically, physically, and chemically affecting downstream aquatic systems. NFWs are hydrologic and chemical sources for other waters, hydrologically connecting across long distances and contributing compounds such as methylated mercury and dissolved organic matter. NFWs reduced flood peaks and maintained baseflows in stream and river networks through hydrologic lag and sink functions, and sequestered or assimilated substantial nutrient inputs through chemical sink and transformative functions. Landscape-scale connectivity of NFWs affects water and material fluxes to downstream river networks, substantially modifying the characteristics and function of downstream waters. Many factors determine the effects of NFW hydrological, physical, and chemical functions on downstream systems, and additional research quantifying these factors and impacts is warranted. We conclude NFWs are hydrologically, chemically, and physically interconnected with stream and river networks though this connectivity varies in frequency, duration, magnitude, and timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R Lane
- National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Scott G Leibowitz
- National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Bradley C Autrey
- National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Stephen D LeDuc
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Laurie C Alexander
- National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leibowitz SG, Wigington PJ, Schofield KA, Alexander LC, Vanderhoof MK, Golden HE. CONNECTIVITY OF STREAMS AND WETLANDS TO DOWNSTREAM WATERS: AN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS FRAMEWORK. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 2018; 54:298-322. [PMID: 30078985 PMCID: PMC6071435 DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Interest in connectivity has increased in the aquatic sciences, partly because of its relevance to the Clean Water Act. This paper has two objectives: (1) provide a framework to understand hydrological, chemical, and biological connectivity, focusing on how headwater streams and wetlands connect to and contribute to rivers; and (2) review methods to quantify hydrological and chemical connectivity. Streams and wetlands affect river structure and function by altering material and biological fluxes to the river; this depends on two factors: (1) functions within streams and wetlands that affect material fluxes; and (2) connectivity (or isolation) from streams and wetlands to rivers that allows (or prevents) material transport between systems. Connectivity can be described in terms of frequency, magnitude, duration, timing, and rate of change. It results from physical characteristics of a system, e.g., climate, soils, geology, topography, and the spatial distribution of aquatic components. Biological connectivity is also affected by traits and behavior of the biota. Connectivity can be altered by human impacts, often in complex ways. Because of variability in these factors, connectivity is not constant but varies over time and space. Connectivity can be quantified with field-based methods, modeling, and remote sensing. Further studies using these methods are needed to classify and quantify connectivity of aquatic ecosystems and to understand how impacts affect connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott G Leibowitz
- Research Ecologist (Leibowitz) and formerly Research Hydrologist (Wigington), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35 St, Corvallis, Oregon 97333; Ecologist (Schofield and Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arlington, Virginia 22202; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225; and Research Physical Scientist (Golden), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 (Email/Leibowitz: )
| | - Parker J Wigington
- Research Ecologist (Leibowitz) and formerly Research Hydrologist (Wigington), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35 St, Corvallis, Oregon 97333; Ecologist (Schofield and Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arlington, Virginia 22202; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225; and Research Physical Scientist (Golden), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 (Email/Leibowitz: )
| | - Kate A Schofield
- Research Ecologist (Leibowitz) and formerly Research Hydrologist (Wigington), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35 St, Corvallis, Oregon 97333; Ecologist (Schofield and Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arlington, Virginia 22202; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225; and Research Physical Scientist (Golden), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 (Email/Leibowitz: )
| | - Laurie C Alexander
- Research Ecologist (Leibowitz) and formerly Research Hydrologist (Wigington), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35 St, Corvallis, Oregon 97333; Ecologist (Schofield and Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arlington, Virginia 22202; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225; and Research Physical Scientist (Golden), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 (Email/Leibowitz: )
| | - Melanie K Vanderhoof
- Research Ecologist (Leibowitz) and formerly Research Hydrologist (Wigington), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35 St, Corvallis, Oregon 97333; Ecologist (Schofield and Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arlington, Virginia 22202; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225; and Research Physical Scientist (Golden), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 (Email/Leibowitz: )
| | - Heather E Golden
- Research Ecologist (Leibowitz) and formerly Research Hydrologist (Wigington), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35 St, Corvallis, Oregon 97333; Ecologist (Schofield and Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arlington, Virginia 22202; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225; and Research Physical Scientist (Golden), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 (Email/Leibowitz: )
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schofield KA, Alexander LC, Ridley CE, Vanderhoof MK, Fritz KM, Autrey BC, DeMeester JE, Kepner WG, Lane CR, Leibowitz SG, Pollard AI. BIOTA CONNECT AQUATIC HABITATS THROUGHOUT FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM MOSAICS. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 2018; 54:372-399. [PMID: 31296983 DOI: 10.1111/17521688.12634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems are linked at various spatial and temporal scales by movements of biota adapted to life in water. We review the literature on movements of aquatic organisms that connect different types of freshwater habitats, focusing on linkages from streams and wetlands to downstream waters. Here, streams, wetlands, rivers, lakes, ponds, and other freshwater habitats are viewed as dynamic freshwater ecosystem mosaics (FEMs) that collectively provide the resources needed to sustain aquatic life. Based on existing evidence, it is clear that biotic linkages throughout FEMs have important consequences for biological integrity and biodiversity. All aquatic organisms move within and among FEM components, but differ in the mode, frequency, distance, and timing of their movements. These movements allow biota to recolonize habitats, avoid inbreeding, escape stressors, locate mates, and acquire resources. Cumulatively, these individual movements connect populations within and among FEMs and contribute to local and regional diversity, resilience to disturbance, and persistence of aquatic species in the face of environmental change. Thus, the biological connections established by movement of biota among streams, wetlands, and downstream waters are critical to the ecological integrity of these systems. Future research will help advance our understanding of the movements that link FEMs and their cumulative effects on downstream waters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate A Schofield
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Laurie C Alexander
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Caroline E Ridley
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Melanie K Vanderhoof
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Ken M Fritz
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Bradley C Autrey
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Julie E DeMeester
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - William G Kepner
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Charles R Lane
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Scott G Leibowitz
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Amina I Pollard
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schofield KA, Alexander LC, Ridley CE, Vanderhoof MK, Fritz KM, Autrey BC, DeMeester JE, Kepner WG, Lane CR, Leibowitz SG, Pollard AI. BIOTA CONNECT AQUATIC HABITATS THROUGHOUT FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM MOSAICS. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 2018; 54:372-399. [PMID: 31296983 PMCID: PMC6621606 DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems are linked at various spatial and temporal scales by movements of biota adapted to life in water. We review the literature on movements of aquatic organisms that connect different types of freshwater habitats, focusing on linkages from streams and wetlands to downstream waters. Here, streams, wetlands, rivers, lakes, ponds, and other freshwater habitats are viewed as dynamic freshwater ecosystem mosaics (FEMs) that collectively provide the resources needed to sustain aquatic life. Based on existing evidence, it is clear that biotic linkages throughout FEMs have important consequences for biological integrity and biodiversity. All aquatic organisms move within and among FEM components, but differ in the mode, frequency, distance, and timing of their movements. These movements allow biota to recolonize habitats, avoid inbreeding, escape stressors, locate mates, and acquire resources. Cumulatively, these individual movements connect populations within and among FEMs and contribute to local and regional diversity, resilience to disturbance, and persistence of aquatic species in the face of environmental change. Thus, the biological connections established by movement of biota among streams, wetlands, and downstream waters are critical to the ecological integrity of these systems. Future research will help advance our understanding of the movements that link FEMs and their cumulative effects on downstream waters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate A Schofield
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Laurie C Alexander
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Caroline E Ridley
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Melanie K Vanderhoof
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Ken M Fritz
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Bradley C Autrey
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Julie E DeMeester
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - William G Kepner
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Charles R Lane
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Scott G Leibowitz
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| | - Amina I Pollard
- Respectively, Ecologist (Schofield), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue. NW, Mail Code 8623R, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Alexander), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460; Ecologist (Ridley), National Center for Environmental Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; Research Geographer (Vanderhoof), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center, US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225; Research Ecologist (Fritz), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Program Analyst (Autrey), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; Water Program Director (DeMeester), The Nature Conservancy, Durham, NC 27701; Research Ecologist (Kepner), Research Ecologist (Lane), National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268; National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV 89119; Research Ecologist (Leibowitz), National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR 97333; Research Ecologist (Pollard), Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460
| |
Collapse
|