1
|
Li Z, Zhao W, Jiang Y, Wen Y, Li M, Liu L, Zou K. New insights into biologic interpretation of bioinformatic pipelines for fish eDNA metabarcoding: A case study in Pearl River estuary. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 368:122136. [PMID: 39128344 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an emerging tool for monitoring biological communities in aquatic ecosystems. The selection of bioinformatic pipelines significantly impacts the results of biodiversity assessments. However, there is currently no consensus on the appropriate bioinformatic pipelines for fish community analysis in eDNA metabarcoding. In this study, we compared three bioinformatic pipelines (Uparse, DADA2, and UNOISE3) using real and mock (constructed with 15/30 known fish) communities to investigate the differences in biological interpretation during the data analysis process in eDNA metabarcoding. Performance evaluation and diversity analyses revealed that the choice of bioinformatic pipeline could impact the biological results of metabarcoding experiments. Among the three pipelines, the operational taxonomic units (OTU)-based pipeline (Uparse) showed the best performance (sensitivity: 0.6250 ± 0.0166; compositional similarity: 0.4000 ± 0.0571), the highest richness (25-102) and minimal inter-group differences in alpha diversity. It suggested the OTU-based pipeline possessed superior capability in fish diversity monitoring compared to ASV/ZOTU-based pipeline. Additionally, the Bray-Curtis distance matrix achieved the highest discriminative effect in the PCoA (43.3%-53.89%) and inter-group analysis (P < 0.01), indicating it was better at distinguishing compositional differences or specific genera of fish community at different sampling sites than other distance matrices. These findings provide new insights into fish community monitoring through eDNA metabarcoding in estuarine environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuoying Li
- Joint Laboratory of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong Region on Marine Bioresource Conservation and Exploitation, College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wencheng Zhao
- Joint Laboratory of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong Region on Marine Bioresource Conservation and Exploitation, College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yun Jiang
- Joint Laboratory of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong Region on Marine Bioresource Conservation and Exploitation, College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongjing Wen
- Joint Laboratory of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong Region on Marine Bioresource Conservation and Exploitation, College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Li
- Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Open-sea Fishery, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, 510300, China.
| | - Li Liu
- Joint Laboratory of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong Region on Marine Bioresource Conservation and Exploitation, College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China
| | - Keshu Zou
- Joint Laboratory of Guangdong Province and Hong Kong Region on Marine Bioresource Conservation and Exploitation, College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University, 510642, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rund H, Wanzenböck J, Dobrovolny S, Kurmayer R. Relating target fish DNA concentration to community composition analysis in freshwater fish via metabarcoding. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 927:172281. [PMID: 38588740 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Metabarcoding has been widely accepted as a useful tool for biodiversity assessment based on eDNA. The method allows for the detection of entire groups of organisms in a single sample, making it particularly applicable in aquatic habitats. The high sensitivity of the molecular approaches is especially beneficial in detecting elusive and rare fish species, improving biodiversity assessments. Numerous biotic and abiotic factors that affect the persistence and availability of fish DNA in surface waters and therefore affecting species detectability, have been identified. However, little is known about the relationship between the total fish DNA concentration and the detectability of differential abundant species. In this study three controlled mock-community DNA samples (56 individual samples) were analyzed by (i) metabarcoding (MiSeq) of 12S rDNA (175 bp) and by (ii) total freshwater fish DNA quantification (via qPCR of 12S rDNA). We show that the fish DNA quantity affects the relative abundance of species-specific sequences and the detectability of rare species. In particular we found that samples with a concentration between 1000 pg/μL down to 10 pg/μL of total fish DNA revealed a stable relative frequency of DNA sequences obtained for a specific fish species, as well as a low variability between replicates. Additionally, we observed that even in complex mock-community DNA samples, a total fish DNA concentration of 23 pg/μL was sufficient to reliably detect all species in every replicate, including three rare species with proportions of ≤0.5 %. We also found that the DNA barcode similarity between species can affect detectability, if evenness is low. Our data suggest that the total DNA concentration of fish is an important factor to consider when analyzing and interpreting relative sequence abundance data. Therefore, the workflow proposed here will contribute to an ecologically and economically efficient application of metabarcoding in fish biodiversity assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Rund
- Research Department for Limnology, Mondsee, Universität Innsbruck, Mondseestraße 9, 5310 Mondsee, Austria.
| | - Josef Wanzenböck
- Research Department for Limnology, Mondsee, Universität Innsbruck, Mondseestraße 9, 5310 Mondsee, Austria
| | - Stefanie Dobrovolny
- Department for Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Institute for Food Safety Vienna, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Spargelfeldstraße 191, 1220 Vienna, Austria
| | - Rainer Kurmayer
- Research Department for Limnology, Mondsee, Universität Innsbruck, Mondseestraße 9, 5310 Mondsee, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Forry SP, Servetas SL, Kralj JG, Soh K, Hadjithomas M, Cano R, Carlin M, Amorim MGD, Auch B, Bakker MG, Bartelli TF, Bustamante JP, Cassol I, Chalita M, Dias-Neto E, Duca AD, Gohl DM, Kazantseva J, Haruna MT, Menzel P, Moda BS, Neuberger-Castillo L, Nunes DN, Patel IR, Peralta RD, Saliou A, Schwarzer R, Sevilla S, Takenaka IKTM, Wang JR, Knight R, Gevers D, Jackson SA. Variability and bias in microbiome metagenomic sequencing: an interlaboratory study comparing experimental protocols. Sci Rep 2024; 14:9785. [PMID: 38684791 PMCID: PMC11059151 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57981-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Several studies have documented the significant impact of methodological choices in microbiome analyses. The myriad of methodological options available complicate the replication of results and generally limit the comparability of findings between independent studies that use differing techniques and measurement pipelines. Here we describe the Mosaic Standards Challenge (MSC), an international interlaboratory study designed to assess the impact of methodological variables on the results. The MSC did not prescribe methods but rather asked participating labs to analyze 7 shared reference samples (5 × human stool samples and 2 × mock communities) using their standard laboratory methods. To capture the array of methodological variables, each participating lab completed a metadata reporting sheet that included 100 different questions regarding the details of their protocol. The goal of this study was to survey the methodological landscape for microbiome metagenomic sequencing (MGS) analyses and the impact of methodological decisions on metagenomic sequencing results. A total of 44 labs participated in the MSC by submitting results (16S or WGS) along with accompanying metadata; thirty 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets and 14 WGS datasets were collected. The inclusion of two types of reference materials (human stool and mock communities) enabled analysis of both MGS measurement variability between different protocols using the biologically-relevant stool samples, and MGS bias with respect to ground truth values using the DNA mixtures. Owing to the compositional nature of MGS measurements, analyses were conducted on the ratio of Firmicutes: Bacteroidetes allowing us to directly apply common statistical methods. The resulting analysis demonstrated that protocol choices have significant effects, including both bias of the MGS measurement associated with a particular methodological choices, as well as effects on measurement robustness as observed through the spread of results between labs making similar methodological choices. In the analysis of the DNA mock communities, MGS measurement bias was observed even when there was general consensus among the participating laboratories. This study was the result of a collaborative effort that included academic, commercial, and government labs. In addition to highlighting the impact of different methodological decisions on MGS result comparability, this work also provides insights for consideration in future microbiome measurement study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel P Forry
- Complex Microbial Systems Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
| | - Stephanie L Servetas
- Complex Microbial Systems Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Jason G Kralj
- Complex Microbial Systems Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Keng Soh
- Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michalis Hadjithomas
- LifeMine Therapeutics, Cambridge Discovery Park, 30 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA, 02140, USA
| | - Raul Cano
- The BioCollective, LLC, 5650 Washington Street, Suite C9, Denver, CO, 80216, USA
| | - Martha Carlin
- The BioCollective, LLC, 5650 Washington Street, Suite C9, Denver, CO, 80216, USA
| | - Maria G de Amorim
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, 01508-010, Brazil
| | - Benjamin Auch
- University of Minnesota Genomics Center, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Matthew G Bakker
- Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
| | - Thais F Bartelli
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, 01508-010, Brazil
| | - Juan P Bustamante
- Laboratorio de Investigación, Desarrollo y Transferencia de la Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Austral (LIDTUA), CIC-Austral, Pilar, Argentina
- Instituto de Investigación y Desarrollo en Bioingeniería y Bioinformática (IBB), CONICET-UNER, Oro Verde, Argentina
- Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Concepción del Uruguay, Argentina
| | - Ignacio Cassol
- Laboratorio de Investigación, Desarrollo y Transferencia de la Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Austral (LIDTUA), CIC-Austral, Pilar, Argentina
| | | | - Emmanuel Dias-Neto
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, 01508-010, Brazil
| | | | - Daryl M Gohl
- University of Minnesota Genomics Center, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Jekaterina Kazantseva
- Center of Food and Fermentation Technologies (TFTAK), Mäealuse 2/4, 12618, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Muyideen T Haruna
- Bioenvironmental Program, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter Menzel
- Labor Berlin Charité Vivantes GmbH, Sylter Str. 2, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bruno S Moda
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, 01508-010, Brazil
- Laboratory of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, 01508-010, Brazil
| | | | - Diana N Nunes
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, 01508-010, Brazil
| | - Isha R Patel
- Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Applied Research and Safety Assessment, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD, 20708, USA
| | - Rodrigo D Peralta
- Laboratorio de Investigación, Desarrollo y Transferencia de la Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad Austral (LIDTUA), CIC-Austral, Pilar, Argentina
- Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Concepción del Uruguay, Argentina
| | - Adrien Saliou
- OMICS Hub, BIOASTER, Microbiology Research Institute, Lyon, France
| | - Rolf Schwarzer
- Labor Berlin Charité Vivantes GmbH, Sylter Str. 2, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Samantha Sevilla
- Center for Cancer Research, CCR Collaborative Bioinformatics Resource, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
- Advanced Biomedical Computational Sciences, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Isabella K T M Takenaka
- Laboratory of Medical Genomics, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, 01508-010, Brazil
| | - Jeremy R Wang
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Rob Knight
- Departments of Pediatrics, Bioengineering and Computer Science & Engineering, and Center for Microbiome Innovation, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0763, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0763, USA
| | - Dirk Gevers
- Seed Health, 2100 Abbot Kinney Blvd, Venice, CA, 90291-7003, USA
| | - Scott A Jackson
- Complex Microbial Systems Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
von Ammon U, Casanovas P, Pochon X, Zirngibl M, Leonard K, Smith A, Chetham J, Milner D, Zaiko A. Harnessing environmental DNA to reveal biogeographical patterns of non-indigenous species for improved co-governance of the marine environment in Aotearoa New Zealand. Sci Rep 2023; 13:17061. [PMID: 37816793 PMCID: PMC10564887 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44258-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Aotearoa New Zealand's Northern region is a major gateway for the incursion and establishment of non-indigenous species (NIS) populations due to high numbers of recreational and commercial vessels. This region also holds a unique marine ecosystem, home to many taonga (treasured) species of cultural and economic importance. Regular surveillance, eradication plans and public information sharing are undertaken by local communities and governmental organizations to protect these ecosystems from the impact of NIS. Recently, considerable investments went into environmental DNA (eDNA) research, a promising approach for the early detection of NIS for complementing existing biosecurity systems. We applied eDNA metabarcoding for elucidating bioregional patterns of NIS distributions across a gradient from harbors (NIS hotspots) to open seas (spreading areas). Samples were collected during a research cruise sailing across three Aotearoa New Zealand harbors, Waitematā, Whangārei and Pēwhairangi (Bay of Islands), and their adjacent coastal waters. The small-ribosomal subunit (18S rRNA) and mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) genes were screened using the online Pest Alert Tool for automated detection of putative NIS sequences. Using a probabilistic modelling approach, location-dependent occupancies of NIS were investigated and related to the current information on species distribution from biosecurity surveillance programs. This study was collaboratively designed with Māori partners to initiate a model of co-governance within the existing science system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Xavier Pochon
- Cawthron Institute, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand
- Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, 6011, New Zealand
| | | | - Kaeden Leonard
- Northland Regional Council, Whangārei, 9021, New Zealand
| | - Aless Smith
- Northland Regional Council, Whangārei, 9021, New Zealand
| | - Juliane Chetham
- Patuharakeke Te Iwi Trust Board, Takahiwai, 0171, New Zealand
| | - Dave Milner
- Patuharakeke Te Iwi Trust Board, Takahiwai, 0171, New Zealand
| | - Anastasija Zaiko
- Cawthron Institute, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand
- Sequench Ltd, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cock PJA, Cooke DEL, Thorpe P, Pritchard L. THAPBI PICT-a fast, cautious, and accurate metabarcoding analysis pipeline. PeerJ 2023; 11:e15648. [PMID: 37609440 PMCID: PMC10441533 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
THAPBI PICT is an open source software pipeline for metabarcoding analysis of Illumina paired-end reads, including cases of multiplexing where more than one amplicon is amplified per DNA sample. Initially a Phytophthora ITS1 Classification Tool (PICT), we demonstrate using worked examples with our own and public data sets how, with appropriate primer settings and a custom database, it can be applied to other amplicons and organisms, and used for reanalysis of existing datasets. The core dataflow of the implementation is (i) data reduction to unique marker sequences, often called amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), (ii) dynamic thresholds for discarding low abundance sequences to remove noise and artifacts (rather than error correction by default), before (iii) classification using a curated reference database. The default classifier assigns a label to each query sequence based on a database match that is either perfect, or a single base pair edit away (substitution, deletion or insertion). Abundance thresholds for inclusion can be set by the user or automatically using per-batch negative or synthetic control samples. Output is designed for practical interpretation by non-specialists and includes a read report (ASVs with classification and counts per sample), sample report (samples with counts per species classification), and a topological graph of ASVs as nodes with short edit distances as edges. Source code available from https://github.com/peterjc/thapbi-pict/ with documentation including installation instructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J. A. Cock
- Information and Computational Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - David E. L. Cooke
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Thorpe
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
- The Data Analysis Group, School of Life Sciences, The University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Leighton Pritchard
- Information and Computational Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carvalho S, Shchepanik H, Aylagas E, Berumen ML, Costa FO, Costello MJ, Duarte S, Ferrario J, Floerl O, Heinle M, Katsanevakis S, Marchini A, Olenin S, Pearman JK, Peixoto RS, Rabaoui LJ, Ruiz G, Srėbalienė G, Therriault TW, Vieira PE, Zaiko A. Hurdles and opportunities in implementing marine biosecurity systems in data-poor regions. Bioscience 2023; 73:494-512. [PMID: 37560322 PMCID: PMC10408360 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biad056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Managing marine nonindigenous species (mNIS) is challenging, because marine environments are highly connected, allowing the dispersal of species across large spatial scales, including geopolitical borders. Cross-border inconsistencies in biosecurity management can promote the spread of mNIS across geopolitical borders, and incursions often go unnoticed or unreported. Collaborative surveillance programs can enhance the early detection of mNIS, when response may still be possible, and can foster capacity building around a common threat. Regional or international databases curated for mNIS can inform local monitoring programs and can foster real-time information exchange on mNIS of concern. When combined, local species reference libraries, publicly available mNIS databases, and predictive modeling can facilitate the development of biosecurity programs in regions lacking baseline data. Biosecurity programs should be practical, feasible, cost-effective, mainly focused on prevention and early detection, and be built on the collaboration and coordination of government, nongovernment organizations, stakeholders, and local citizens for a rapid response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Carvalho
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Red Sea Research Center, 23955-6900 Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hailey Shchepanik
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Red Sea Research Center, 23955-6900 Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Eva Aylagas
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Red Sea Research Center, 23955-6900 Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
- Red Sea Global, Riyadh 12382-6726, Saudi Arabia
| | - Michael L Berumen
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Red Sea Research Center, 23955-6900 Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Filipe O Costa
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA) and Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
| | | | - Sofia Duarte
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA) and Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
| | - Jasmine Ferrario
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Moritz Heinle
- Applied Research Center for Environment & Marine Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
- International Centre for Water Resources and Global Change, Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Agnese Marchini
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sergej Olenin
- Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Lithuania
| | | | - Raquel S Peixoto
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Red Sea Research Center, 23955-6900 Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
| | - Lotfi J Rabaoui
- Applied Research Center for Environment & Marine Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
- National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Greg Ruiz
- Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland
| | | | | | - Pedro E Vieira
- Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA) and Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal
| | - Anastasija Zaiko
- Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand
- Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rijal DP, Hanebrekke T, Arneberg P, Johansen T, Sint D, Traugott M, Skern‐Mauritzen M, Westgaard J. Contaminants reach everywhere: Fish dietary samples should be surface decontaminated prior to molecular diet analysis. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e10187. [PMID: 37342457 PMCID: PMC10277604 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Knowledge of trophic interaction is necessary to understand the dynamics of ecosystems and develop ecosystem-based management. The key data to measure these interactions should come from large-scale diet analyses with good taxonomic resolution. To that end, molecular methods that analyze prey DNA from guts and feces provide high-resolution dietary taxonomic data. However, molecular diet analysis may also produce unreliable results if the samples are contaminated by external sources of DNA. Employing the freshwater European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) as a tracer for sample contamination, we studied the possible route of whitefish in beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella) guts sampled in the Barents Sea. We used whitefish-specific COI primers for diagnostic analysis, and fish-specific 12S and metazoa-specific COI primers for metabarcoding analyses of intestine and stomach contents of fish samples that were either not cleaned, water cleaned, or bleach cleaned after being in contact with whitefish. Both the diagnostic and COI metabarcoding revealed clear positive effects of cleaning samples as whitefish were detected in significantly higher numbers of uncleaned samples compared to water or bleach-cleaned samples. Stomachs were more susceptible to contamination than intestines and bleach cleaning reduced the frequency of whitefish contamination. Also, the metabarcoding approach detected significantly more reads of whitefish in the stomach than in intestine samples. The diagnostic analysis and COI metabarcoding detected contaminants in a higher and comparable number of gut samples than the 12S-based approach. Our study underlines thus the importance of surface decontamination of aquatic samples to obtain reliable diet information from molecular data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Daniela Sint
- Applied Animal Ecology, Department of ZoologyUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
| | - Michael Traugott
- Applied Animal Ecology, Department of ZoologyUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wilding TA, Stoeck T, Morrissey BJ, Carvalho SF, Coulson MW. Maximising signal-to-noise ratios in environmental DNA-based monitoring. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 858:159735. [PMID: 36349630 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Man's impacts on global ecosystems are increasing and there is a growing demand that these activities be appropriately monitored. Monitoring requires measurement of a response metric ('signal') that changes maximally and consistently in response to the monitored activity irrespective of other factors ('noise'), thus maximising the signal-to-noise ratio. Indices derived from time-consuming morphology-based taxonomic identification of organisms are a core part of many monitoring programmes. Metabarcoding is an alternative to morphology-based identification and involves the sequencing of short fragments of DNA ('markers') from multiple taxa simultaneously. DNA suitable for metabarcoding includes that extracted from environmental samples (eDNA). Metabarcoding outputs DNA sequences that can be identified (annotated) by matching them against archived annotated sequences. However, sequences from most organisms are not archived - preventing annotation and potentially limiting metabarcoding in monitoring applications. Consequently, there is growing interest in using unannotated sequences as response metrics in monitoring programmes. We compared the sequences from three commonly used markers (16S (V3/V4 regions), 18S (V1/V2 regions) and COI) and, sampling along steep impact gradients, showed that the 16S and COI sequences were associated with the largest and smallest signal-to-noise ratio respectively. We trialled four separate, intuitive, noise-reduction approaches and demonstrated that removing less frequent sequences improved the signal-to-noise ratio, partitioning an additional 25 % from noise to explanatory factors in non-parametric ANOVA (NPA) and reducing dispersion in the data. For the 16S marker, retaining only the most frequently observed sequence, per sample, resulting in nine sequences across 150 samples, generated a near-maximal signal-to-noise ratio (95 % of the variance explained in NPA). We recommend that NPA, combined with rigorous elimination of less frequent sequences, be used to pre-filter sequences/taxa being used in monitoring applications. Our approach will simplify downstream analysis, for example the identification of key taxa and functional associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Wilding
- Scottish Association for Marine Science, Dunbeg, OBAN, PA34 1QA, UK.
| | - Thorsten Stoeck
- Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Dept. of Ecology, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Barbara J Morrissey
- Institute for Biodiversity and Freshwater Conservation, UHI Inverness, Inverness IV2 5NA, UK
| | | | - Mark W Coulson
- Institute for Biodiversity and Freshwater Conservation, UHI Inverness, Inverness IV2 5NA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gold Z, Wall AR, Schweizer TM, Pentcheff ND, Curd EE, Barber PH, Meyer RS, Wayne R, Stolzenbach K, Prickett K, Luedy J, Wetzer R. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems. PeerJ 2022; 10:e14071. [PMID: 36405018 PMCID: PMC9673773 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a powerful tool that can enhance marine ecosystem/biodiversity monitoring programs. Here we outline five important steps managers and researchers should consider when developing eDNA monitoring program: (1) select genes and primers to target taxa; (2) assemble or develop comprehensive barcode reference databases; (3) apply rigorous site occupancy based decontamination pipelines; (4) conduct pilot studies to define spatial and temporal variance of eDNA; and (5) archive samples, extracts, and raw sequence data. We demonstrate the importance of each of these considerations using a case study of eDNA metabarcoding in the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. eDNA metabarcoding approaches detected 94.1% (16/17) of species observed in paired trawl surveys while identifying an additional 55 native fishes, providing more comprehensive biodiversity inventories. Rigorous benchmarking of eDNA metabarcoding results improved ecological interpretation and confidence in species detections while providing archived genetic resources for future analyses. Well designed and validated eDNA metabarcoding approaches are ideally suited for biomonitoring applications that rely on the detection of species, including mapping invasive species fronts and endangered species habitats as well as tracking range shifts in response to climate change. Incorporating these considerations will enhance the utility and efficacy of eDNA metabarcoding for routine biomonitoring applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Gold
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Adam R. Wall
- Diversity Initiative for the Southern California Ocean (DISCO), Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Teia M. Schweizer
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America
| | - N. Dean Pentcheff
- Diversity Initiative for the Southern California Ocean (DISCO), Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Emily E. Curd
- Department of Natural Sciences, Landmark College, Putney, VT, United States of America
| | - Paul H. Barber
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Rachel S. Meyer
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America
| | - Robert Wayne
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Kevin Stolzenbach
- Wood Environment and Infrastructure, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States of America
| | - Kat Prickett
- Port of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Justin Luedy
- Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, United States of America
| | - Regina Wetzer
- Diversity Initiative for the Southern California Ocean (DISCO), Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hajibabaei M. Demystifying eDNA validation. Trends Ecol Evol 2022; 37:826-828. [PMID: 35902292 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
As environmental DNA (eDNA) approaches gain momentum for biodiversity analysis, validation becomes a key consideration. I focus on four facets of eDNA validation. Validation through technical processes, legal use, official statements, and 'good enough' scenarios can advance the field to aid societal issues such as climate emergency and biodiversity crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrdad Hajibabaei
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics & Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1; Centre for Environmental Genomics Applications, eDNAtec Inc., 14 International Place Unit 103, St. John's, NL, Canada A1A 0R6.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Arribas P, Andújar C, Bohmann K, deWaard JR, Economo EP, Elbrecht V, Geisen S, Goberna M, Krehenwinkel H, Novotny V, Zinger L, Creedy TJ, Meramveliotakis E, Noguerales V, Overcast I, Morlon H, Papadopoulou A, Vogler AP, Emerson BC. Toward global integration of biodiversity big data: a harmonized metabarcode data generation module for terrestrial arthropods. Gigascience 2022; 11:6646445. [PMID: 35852418 PMCID: PMC9295367 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giac065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Metazoan metabarcoding is emerging as an essential strategy for inventorying biodiversity, with diverse projects currently generating massive quantities of community-level data. The potential for integrating across such data sets offers new opportunities to better understand biodiversity and how it might respond to global change. However, large-scale syntheses may be compromised if metabarcoding workflows differ from each other. There are ongoing efforts to improve standardization for the reporting of inventory data. However, harmonization at the stage of generating metabarcode data has yet to be addressed. A modular framework for harmonized data generation offers a pathway to navigate the complex structure of terrestrial metazoan biodiversity. Here, through our collective expertise as practitioners, method developers, and researchers leading metabarcoding initiatives to inventory terrestrial biodiversity, we seek to initiate a harmonized framework for metabarcode data generation, with a terrestrial arthropod module. We develop an initial set of submodules covering the 5 main steps of metabarcode data generation: (i) sample acquisition; (ii) sample processing; (iii) DNA extraction; (iv) polymerase chain reaction amplification, library preparation, and sequencing; and (v) DNA sequence and metadata deposition, providing a backbone for a terrestrial arthropod module. To achieve this, we (i) identified key points for harmonization, (ii) reviewed the current state of the art, and (iii) distilled existing knowledge within submodules, thus promoting best practice by providing guidelines and recommendations to reduce the universe of methodological options. We advocate the adoption and further development of the terrestrial arthropod module. We further encourage the development of modules for other biodiversity fractions as an essential step toward large-scale biodiversity synthesis through harmonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Arribas
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Carmelo Andújar
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Kristine Bohmann
- Section for Evolutionary Genomics, Globe Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeremy R deWaard
- Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, N1G2W1 Guelph, Canada.,School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, N1G2W1 Guelph, Canada
| | - Evan P Economo
- Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 904-0495 Japan
| | - Vasco Elbrecht
- Centre for Biodiversity Monitoring (ZBM), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig,D-53113 Bonn, Germany
| | - Stefan Geisen
- Laboratory of Nematology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, 6708PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Goberna
- Department of Environment and Agronomy, INIA-CSIC, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Vojtech Novotny
- Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.,Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
| | - Lucie Zinger
- Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France.,Naturalis Biodiversity Center, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas J Creedy
- Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW7 5BD London, UK
| | | | - Víctor Noguerales
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| | - Isaac Overcast
- Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Hélène Morlon
- Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Anna Papadopoulou
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Alfried P Vogler
- Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, SW7 5BD London, UK.,Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, UK
| | - Brent C Emerson
- Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), 38206 San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Klink R, August T, Bas Y, Bodesheim P, Bonn A, Fossøy F, Høye TT, Jongejans E, Menz MHM, Miraldo A, Roslin T, Roy HE, Ruczyński I, Schigel D, Schäffler L, Sheard JK, Svenningsen C, Tschan GF, Wäldchen J, Zizka VMA, Åström J, Bowler DE. Emerging technologies revolutionise insect ecology and monitoring. Trends Ecol Evol 2022; 37:872-885. [PMID: 35811172 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Insects are the most diverse group of animals on Earth, but their small size and high diversity have always made them challenging to study. Recent technological advances have the potential to revolutionise insect ecology and monitoring. We describe the state of the art of four technologies (computer vision, acoustic monitoring, radar, and molecular methods), and assess their advantages, current limitations, and future potential. We discuss how these technologies can adhere to modern standards of data curation and transparency, their implications for citizen science, and their potential for integration among different monitoring programmes and technologies. We argue that they provide unprecedented possibilities for insect ecology and monitoring, but it will be important to foster international standards via collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roel van Klink
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle Jena Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; Martin Luther University-Halle Wittenberg, Department of Computer Science, 06099, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Tom August
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - Yves Bas
- Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; CEFE, Université Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - Paul Bodesheim
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Computer Vision Group, Ernst-Abbe-Platz 2, 07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Aletta Bonn
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle Jena Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; Helmholtz - Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany; Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Institute of Biodiversity, Dornburger Strasse 159, 07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Frode Fossøy
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685 Torgarden, 7485, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Toke T Høye
- Aarhus University, Department of Ecoscience and Arctic Research Centre, C.F. Møllers Allé 8, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eelke Jongejans
- Radboud University, Animal Ecology and Physiology, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525, AJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Animal Ecology, Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Myles H M Menz
- Max Planck Institute for Animal Behaviour, Department of Migration, Am Obstberg 1, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany; College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia
| | - Andreia Miraldo
- Swedish Museum of Natural Sciences, Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Frescativägen 40, 114 18, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tomas Roslin
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Ecology, Ulls väg 18B, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helen E Roy
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK
| | - Ireneusz Ruczyński
- Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Stoczek 1, 17-230, Białowieża, Poland
| | - Dmitry Schigel
- Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Livia Schäffler
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113, Bonn, Germany
| | - Julie K Sheard
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle Jena Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; Helmholtz - Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany; Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Institute of Biodiversity, Dornburger Strasse 159, 07743, Jena, Germany; University of Copenhagen, Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, Universitetsparken 15, bld. 3, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Svenningsen
- University of Copenhagen, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Georg F Tschan
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jana Wäldchen
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle Jena Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Hans-Knoell-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
| | - Vera M A Zizka
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn, Adenauerallee 127, 53113, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jens Åström
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685 Torgarden, 7485, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Diana E Bowler
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle Jena Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK; Helmholtz - Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany; Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Institute of Biodiversity, Dornburger Strasse 159, 07743, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Zinger L, Nilsson RH, Kennedy PG, Yang T, Anslan S, Mikryukov V. Best practices in metabarcoding of fungi: From experimental design to results. Mol Ecol 2022; 31:2769-2795. [PMID: 35395127 DOI: 10.1111/mec.16460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The development of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies has greatly improved our capacity to identify fungi and unveil their ecological roles across a variety of ecosystems. Here we provide an overview of current best practices in metabarcoding analysis of fungal communities, from experimental design through molecular and computational analyses. By reanalysing published data sets, we demonstrate that operational taxonomic units (OTUs) outperform amplified sequence variants (ASVs) in recovering fungal diversity, a finding that is particularly evident for long markers. Additionally, analysis of the full-length ITS region allows more accurate taxonomic placement of fungi and other eukaryotes compared to the ITS2 subregion. Finally, we show that specific methods for compositional data analyses provide more reliable estimates of shifts in community structure. We conclude that metabarcoding analyses of fungi are especially promising for integrating fungi into the full microbiome and broader ecosystem functioning context, recovery of novel fungal lineages and ancient organisms as well as barcoding of old specimens including type material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leho Tedersoo
- Mycology and Microbiology Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Bahram
- Mycology and Microbiology Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lucie Zinger
- Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de Biologie, École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.,Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R Henrik Nilsson
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Peter G Kennedy
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Teng Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China
| | - Sten Anslan
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Vladimir Mikryukov
- Mycology and Microbiology Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barnes CJ, Clausen ML, Asplund M, Rasmussen L, Olesen CM, Yüsel YT, Andersen PS, Litman T, Hansen AJ, Agner T. Temporal and Spatial Variation of the Skin-Associated Bacteria from Healthy Participants and Atopic Dermatitis Patients. mSphere 2022; 7:e0091721. [PMID: 35196118 PMCID: PMC8865923 DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00917-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Several factors have been shown to influence the composition of the bacterial communities inhabiting healthy skin, with variation between different individuals, differing skin depths, and body locations (spatial-temporal variation). Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease also affecting the skin-associated bacterial communities. While the effects of AD have been studied on these processes individually, few have considered how AD disrupts the spatial-temporal variation of the skin bacteria as a whole (i.e., considered these processes simultaneously). Here, we characterized the skin-associated bacterial communities of healthy volunteers and lesional and nonlesional skin of AD patients by metabarcoding the universal V3-V4 16S rRNA region from tape strip skin samples. We quantified the spatial-temporal variation (interindividual variation, differing skin depths, multiple time points) of the skin-associated bacteria within healthy controls and AD patients, including the relative change induced by AD in each. Interindividual variation correlated with the bacterial community far more strongly than any other factors followed by skin depth and then AD status. There was no significant temporal variation found within either AD patients or healthy controls. The bacterial community was found to vary markedly according to AD severity, and between patients without and with filaggrin mutations. Therefore, future studies may benefit from sampling subsurface epidermal communities and considering AD severity and the host genome in understanding the role of the skin bacterial community within AD pathogenesis rather than considering AD as a presence-absence disorder. IMPORTANCE The bacteria associated with human skin may influence skin barrier function and the immune response. Previous studies have attempted to understand the factors that regulate the skin bacteria, characterizing the spatial-temporal variation of the skin bacteria within unaffected skin. Here, we quantified the effect of AD on the skin bacteria on multiple spatial-temporal factors simultaneously. Although significant community variation between healthy controls and AD patients was observed, the effects of AD on the overall bacterial community were relatively low compared to other measured factors. Results here suggest that changes in specific taxa rather than wholesale changes in the skin bacteria are associated with mild to moderate AD. Further studies would benefit from incorporating the complexity of AD into models to better understand the condition, including AD severity and the host genome, alongside microbial composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J. Barnes
- The Globe Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maja-Lisa Clausen
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Asplund
- The Globe Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Linett Rasmussen
- The Globe Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Caroline Meyer Olesen
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yasemin Topal Yüsel
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Paal Skytt Andersen
- Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Insitute, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Litman
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, LEO Foundation Skin Immunology Research Center, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Tove Agner
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nagai S, Sildever S, Nishi N, Tazawa S, Basti L, Kobayashi T, Ishino Y. Comparing PCR-generated artifacts of different polymerases for improved accuracy of DNA metabarcoding. METABARCODING AND METAGENOMICS 2022. [DOI: 10.3897/mbmg.6.77704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Accuracy of PCR amplification is vital for obtaining reliable amplicon-sequencing results by metabarcoding. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of error profiles in the PCR products by 14 different PCR kits using a mock eukaryotic community DNA sample mimicking metabarcoding analysis. To prepare a mock eukaryotic community from the marine environment, equal amounts of plasmid DNA from 40 microalgal species were mixed and used for amplicon-sequencing by a high-throughput sequencing approach. To compare the differences in PCR kits used for this experiment, we focused on the following seven parameters: 1) Quality, 2) Chimera, 3) Blast top hit accuracy, 4) Deletion, 5) Insertion, 6) Base substitution and 7) Amplification bias amongst species. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) for all of the seven parameters depending on the PCR kits used. These differences may result from the different DNA polymerases included in each kit, although the result can also be influenced by PCR reaction conditions. Simultaneous analysis of several parameters suggested that kits containing KOD plus Neo (TOYOBO) and HotStart Taq DNA polymerase (BiONEER, CA, US) at the annealing temperature of 65 °C displayed better results in terms of parameters associated with chimeras, top hit similarity and deletions.
Collapse
|