1
|
Glaser-Schmitt A, Lemoine M, Kaltenpoth M, Parsch J. Pervasive tissue-, genetic background-, and allele-specific gene expression effects in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet 2024; 20:e1011257. [PMID: 39178312 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The pervasiveness of gene expression variation and its contribution to phenotypic variation and evolution is well known. This gene expression variation is context dependent, with differences in regulatory architecture often associated with intrinsic and environmental factors, and is modulated by regulatory elements that can act in cis (linked) or in trans (unlinked) relative to the genes they affect. So far, little is known about how this genetic variation affects the evolution of regulatory architecture among closely related tissues during population divergence. To address this question, we analyzed gene expression in the midgut, hindgut, and Malpighian tubule as well as microbiome composition in the two gut tissues in four Drosophila melanogaster strains and their F1 hybrids from two divergent populations: one from the derived, European range and one from the ancestral, African range. In both the transcriptome and microbiome data, we detected extensive tissue- and genetic background-specific effects, including effects of genetic background on overall tissue specificity. Tissue-specific effects were typically stronger than genetic background-specific effects, although the two gut tissues were not more similar to each other than to the Malpighian tubules. An examination of allele specific expression revealed that, while both cis and trans effects were more tissue-specific in genes expressed differentially between populations than genes with conserved expression, trans effects were more tissue-specific than cis effects. Despite there being highly variable regulatory architecture, this observation was robust across tissues and genetic backgrounds, suggesting that the expression of trans variation can be spatially fine-tuned as well as or better than cis variation during population divergence and yielding new insights into cis and trans regulatory evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Glaser-Schmitt
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Lemoine
- Department of Insect Symbiosis, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
| | - Martin Kaltenpoth
- Department of Insect Symbiosis, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
| | - John Parsch
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rombaut A, Gallet R, Qitout K, Samy M, Guilhot R, Ghirardini P, Lazzaro BP, Becher PG, Xuéreb A, Gibert P, Fellous S. Microbiota-mediated competition between Drosophila species. MICROBIOME 2023; 11:201. [PMID: 37679800 PMCID: PMC10483763 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-023-01617-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of microbiota in ecological interactions, and in particular competition, is poorly known. We studied competition between two insect species, the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii and the model Drosophila melanogaster, whose larval ecological niches overlap in ripe, but not rotten, fruit. RESULTS We discovered D. suzukii females prevent costly interspecific larval competition by avoiding oviposition on substrates previously visited by D. melanogaster. More precisely, D. melanogaster association with gut bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus triggered D. suzukii avoidance. However, D. suzukii avoidance behavior is condition-dependent, and D. suzukii females that themselves carry D. melanogaster bacteria stop avoiding sites visited by D. melanogaster. The adaptive significance of avoiding cues from the competitor's microbiota was revealed by experimentally reproducing in-fruit larval competition: reduced survival of D. suzukii larvae only occurred if the competitor had its normal microbiota. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes microbiotas as potent mediators of interspecific competition and reveals a central role for context-dependent behaviors under bacterial influence. Video Abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Rombaut
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Romain Gallet
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Kenza Qitout
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Mukherjy Samy
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Robin Guilhot
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pauline Ghirardini
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Brian P Lazzaro
- Department of Entomology, Cornell Institute of Host-Microbe Interactions and Disease, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Paul G Becher
- Dept Plant Protection Biology - Chemical Ecology Horticulture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Anne Xuéreb
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Patricia Gibert
- Laboratoire de Biométrie Et Biologie Evolutive, UMR 5558, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Simon Fellous
- CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Theys C, Verheyen J, Janssens L, Tüzün N, Stoks R. Effects of heat and pesticide stress on life history, physiology and the gut microbiome of two congeneric damselflies that differ in stressor tolerance. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 875:162617. [PMID: 36871721 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The combined impact of toxicants and warming on organisms is getting increased attention in ecotoxicology, but is still hard to predict, especially with regard to heat waves. Recent studies suggested that the gut microbiome may provide mechanistic insights into the single and combined stressor effects on their host. We therefore investigated effects of sequential exposure to a heat spike and a pesticide on both the phenotype (life history and physiology) and the gut microbiome composition of damselfly larvae. We compared the fast-paced Ischnura pumilio, which is more tolerant to both stressors, with the slow-paced I. elegans, to obtain mechanistic insights into species-specific stressor effects. The two species differed in gut microbiome composition, potentially contributing to their pace-of-life differences. Intriguingly, there was a general resemblance between the stressor response patterns in the phenotype and in the gut microbiome, whereby both species responded broadly similar to the single and combined stressors. The heat spike negatively affected the life history of both species (increased mortality, reduced growth rate), which could be explained not only by shared negative effects on physiology (inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, increase of malondialdehyde), but also by shared effects on gut bacterial species' abundances. The pesticide only had negative effects (reduced growth rate, reduced net energy budget) in I. elegans. The pesticide generated shifts in the bacterial community composition (e.g. increased abundance of Sphaerotilus and Enterobacteriaceae in the gut microbiome of I. pumilio), which potentially contributed to the relatively higher pesticide tolerance of I. pumilio. Moreover, in line with the response patterns in the host phenotype, the effects of the heat spike and the pesticide on the gut microbiome were mainly additive. By contrasting two species differing in stress tolerance, our results suggest that response patterns in the gut microbiome may improve our mechanistic understanding of single and combined stressor effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Theys
- Laboratory of Evolutionary Stress Ecology and Ecotoxicology, University of Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Julie Verheyen
- Laboratory of Evolutionary Stress Ecology and Ecotoxicology, University of Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lizanne Janssens
- Laboratory of Evolutionary Stress Ecology and Ecotoxicology, University of Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nedim Tüzün
- Laboratory of Evolutionary Stress Ecology and Ecotoxicology, University of Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Evolutionary and Integrative Ecology, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 301, 12587 Berlin, Germany
| | - Robby Stoks
- Laboratory of Evolutionary Stress Ecology and Ecotoxicology, University of Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Henry LP, Ayroles JF. Drosophila melanogaster microbiome is shaped by strict filtering and neutrality along a latitudinal cline. Mol Ecol 2022; 31:5861-5871. [PMID: 36094780 PMCID: PMC9643648 DOI: 10.1111/mec.16692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Microbiomes affect many aspects of host biology, but the eco-evolutionary forces that shape their diversity in natural populations remain poorly understood. Geographical gradients, such as latitudinal clines, generate predictable patterns in biodiversity at macroecological scales, but whether these macroscale processes apply to host-microbiome interactions is an open question. To address this question, we sampled the microbiomes of 13 natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster along a latitudinal cline in the eastern United States. The microbiomes were surprisingly consistent across the cline, as latitude did not predict either alpha or beta diversity. Only a narrow taxonomic range of bacteria were present in all microbiomes, indicating that strict taxonomic filtering by the host and neutral ecological dynamics are the primary factors shaping the fly microbiome. Our findings reveal the complexity of eco-evolutionary interactions shaping microbial variation in D. melanogaster and highlight the need for additional sampling of the microbiomes in natural populations along environmental gradients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas P Henry
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - Julien F Ayroles
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
- Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paddock KJ, Finke DL, Kim KS, Sappington TW, Hibbard BE. Patterns of Microbiome Composition Vary Across Spatial Scales in a Specialist Insect. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:898744. [PMID: 35722352 PMCID: PMC9201478 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.898744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Microbial communities associated with animals vary based on both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Of many possible determinants affecting microbiome composition, host phylogeny, host diet, and local environment are the most important. How these factors interact across spatial scales is not well understood. Here, we seek to identify the main influences on microbiome composition in a specialist insect, the western corn rootworm (WCR; Diabrotica virgifera virgifera), by analyzing the bacterial communities of adults collected from their obligate host plant, corn (Zea mays), across several geographic locations and comparing the patterns in communities to its congeneric species, the northern corn rootworm (NCR; Diabrotica barberi). We found that bacterial communities of WCR and NCR shared a portion of their bacterial communities even when collected from disparate locations. However, within each species, the location of collection significantly influenced the composition of their microbiome. Correlations of geographic distance between sites with WCR bacterial community composition revealed different patterns at different spatial scales. Community similarity decreased with increased geographic distance at smaller spatial scales (~25 km between the nearest sites). At broad spatial scales (>200 km), community composition was not correlated with distances between sites, but instead reflected the historical invasion path of WCR across the United States. These results suggest bacterial communities are structured directly by dispersal dynamics at small, regional spatial scales, while landscape-level genetic or environmental differences may drive community composition across broad spatial scales in this specialist insect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle J Paddock
- Division of Plant Science and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Deborah L Finke
- Division of Plant Science and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Kyung Seok Kim
- Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
| | - Thomas W Sappington
- USDA-ARS, Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
| | - Bruce E Hibbard
- USDA-ARS, Plant Genetics Research Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weinhold A. Bowel Movement: Integrating Host Mobility and Microbial Transmission Across Host Taxa. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:826364. [PMID: 35242121 PMCID: PMC8886138 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.826364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The gut microbiota of animals displays a high degree of plasticity with respect to environmental or dietary adaptations and is shaped by factors like social interactions, diet diversity or the local environment. But the contribution of these drivers varies across host taxa and our ability to explain microbiome variability within wild populations remains limited. Terrestrial animals have divergent mobility ranges and can either crawl, walk or fly, from a couple of centimeters toward thousands of kilometers. Animal movement has been little regarded in host microbiota frameworks, though it can directly influence major drivers of the host microbiota: (1) Aggregation movement can enhance social transmissions, (2) foraging movement can extend range of diet diversity, and (3) dispersal movement determines the local environment of a host. Here, I would like to outline how movement behaviors of different host taxa matter for microbial acquisition across mammals, birds as well as insects. Host movement can have contrasting effects and either reduce or enlarge spatial scale. Increased dispersal movement could dissolve local effects of sampling location, while aggregation could enhance inter-host transmissions and uniformity among social groups. Host movement can also extend the boundaries of microbial dispersal limitations and connect habitat patches across plant-pollinator networks, while the microbiota of wild populations could converge toward a uniform pattern when mobility is interrupted in captivity or laboratory settings. Hence, the implementation of host movement would be a valuable addition to the metacommunity concept, to comprehend microbial dispersal within and across trophic levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Weinhold
- Faculty of Biology, Cellular and Organismic Networks, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mazzucco R, Schlötterer C. Long-term gut microbiome dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster reveal environment-specific associations between bacterial taxa at the family level. Proc Biol Sci 2021; 288:20212193. [PMID: 34905708 PMCID: PMC8670958 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The influence of the microbiome on its host is well-documented, but the interplay of its members is not yet well-understood. Even for simple microbiomes, the interaction among members of the microbiome is difficult to study. Longitudinal studies provide a promising approach to studying such interactions through the temporal covariation of different taxonomic units. By contrast to most longitudinal studies, which span only a single host generation, we here present a post hoc analysis of a whole-genome dataset of 81 samples that follows microbiome composition for up to 180 host generations, which cover nearly 10 years. The microbiome diversity remained rather stable in replicated Drosophila melanogaster populations exposed to two different temperature regimes. The composition changed, however, systematically across replicates of the two temperature regimes. Significant associations between families, mostly specific to one temperature regime, indicate functional interdependence of different microbiome components. These associations also involve moderately abundant families, which emphasizes their functional importance, and highlights the importance of looking beyond the common constituents of the Drosophila microbiome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupert Mazzucco
- Institut für Populationsgenetik, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien, Veterinärplatz 1, Wien 1210, Austria
| | - Christian Schlötterer
- Institut für Populationsgenetik, Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien, Veterinärplatz 1, Wien 1210, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Horizontal gene transfer-mediated bacterial strain variation affects host fitness in Drosophila. BMC Biol 2021; 19:187. [PMID: 34565363 PMCID: PMC8474910 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01124-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background How microbes affect host fitness and environmental adaptation has become a fundamental research question in evolutionary biology. To better understand the role of microbial genomic variation for host fitness, we tested for associations of bacterial genomic variation and Drosophila melanogaster offspring number in a microbial Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS). Results We performed a microbial GWAS, leveraging strain variation in the genus Gluconobacter, a genus of bacteria that are commonly associated with Drosophila under natural conditions. We pinpoint the thiamine biosynthesis pathway (TBP) as contributing to differences in fitness conferred to the fly host. While an effect of thiamine on fly development has been described, we show that strain variation in TBP between bacterial isolates from wild-caught D. melanogaster contributes to variation in offspring production by the host. By tracing the evolutionary history of TBP genes in Gluconobacter, we find that TBP genes were most likely lost and reacquired by horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Conclusion Our study emphasizes the importance of strain variation and highlights that HGT can add to microbiome flexibility and potentially to host adaptation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-021-01124-y.
Collapse
|
9
|
McMullen JG, Bueno E, Blow F, Douglas AE. Genome-Inferred Correspondence between Phylogeny and Metabolic Traits in the Wild Drosophila Gut Microbiome. Genome Biol Evol 2021; 13:evab127. [PMID: 34081101 PMCID: PMC8358223 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evab127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Annotated genome sequences provide valuable insight into the functional capabilities of members of microbial communities. Nevertheless, most studies on the microbiome in animal guts use metagenomic data, hampering the assignment of genes to specific microbial taxa. Here, we make use of the readily culturable bacterial communities in the gut of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to obtain draft genome sequences for 96 isolates from wild flies. These include 81 new de novo assembled genomes, assigned to three orders (Enterobacterales, Lactobacillales, and Rhodospirillales) with 80% of strains identified to species level using average nucleotide identity and phylogenomic reconstruction. Based on annotations by the RAST pipeline, among-isolate variation in metabolic function partitioned strongly by bacterial order, particularly by amino acid metabolism (Rhodospirillales), fermentation, and nucleotide metabolism (Lactobacillales) and arginine, urea, and polyamine metabolism (Enterobacterales). Seven bacterial species, comprising 2-3 species in each order, were well-represented among the isolates and included ≥5 strains, permitting analysis of metabolic functions in the accessory genome (i.e., genes not present in every strain). Overall, the metabolic function in the accessory genome partitioned by bacterial order. Two species, Gluconobacter cerinus (Rhodospirillales) and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Lactobacillales) had large accessory genomes, and metabolic functions were dominated by amino acid metabolism (G. cerinus) and carbohydrate metabolism (La. plantarum). The patterns of variation in metabolic capabilities at multiple phylogenetic scales provide the basis for future studies of the ecological and evolutionary processes shaping the diversity of microorganisms associated with natural populations of Drosophila.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G McMullen
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Eduardo Bueno
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Frances Blow
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Angela E Douglas
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaya C, Generalovic TN, Ståhls G, Hauser M, Samayoa AC, Nunes-Silva CG, Roxburgh H, Wohlfahrt J, Ewusie EA, Kenis M, Hanboonsong Y, Orozco J, Carrejo N, Nakamura S, Gasco L, Rojo S, Tanga CM, Meier R, Rhode C, Picard CJ, Jiggins CD, Leiber F, Tomberlin JK, Hasselmann M, Blanckenhorn WU, Kapun M, Sandrock C. Global population genetic structure and demographic trajectories of the black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens. BMC Biol 2021; 19:94. [PMID: 33952283 PMCID: PMC8101212 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01029-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) is the most promising insect candidate for nutrient-recycling through bioconversion of organic waste into biomass, thereby improving sustainability of protein supplies for animal feed and facilitating transition to a circular economy. Contrary to conventional livestock, genetic resources of farmed insects remain poorly characterised. We present the first comprehensive population genetic characterisation of H. illucens. Based on 15 novel microsatellite markers, we genotyped and analysed 2862 individuals from 150 wild and captive populations originating from 57 countries on seven subcontinents. Results We identified 16 well-distinguished genetic clusters indicating substantial global population structure. The data revealed genetic hotspots in central South America and successive northwards range expansions within the indigenous ranges of the Americas. Colonisations and naturalisations of largely unique genetic profiles occurred on all non-native continents, either preceded by demographically independent founder events from various single sources or involving admixture scenarios. A decisive primarily admixed Polynesian bridgehead population serially colonised the entire Australasian region and its secondarily admixed descendants successively mediated invasions into Africa and Europe. Conversely, captive populations from several continents traced back to a single North American origin and exhibit considerably reduced genetic diversity, although some farmed strains carry distinct genetic signatures. We highlight genetic footprints characteristic of progressing domestication due to increasing socio-economic importance of H. illucens, and ongoing introgression between domesticated strains globally traded for large-scale farming and wild populations in some regions. Conclusions We document the dynamic population genetic history of a cosmopolitan dipteran of South American origin shaped by striking geographic patterns. These reflect both ancient dispersal routes, and stochastic and heterogeneous anthropogenic introductions during the last century leading to pronounced diversification of worldwide structure of H. illucens. Upon the recent advent of its agronomic commercialisation, however, current human-mediated translocations of the black soldier fly largely involve genetically highly uniform domesticated strains, which meanwhile threaten the genetic integrity of differentiated unique local resources through introgression. Our in-depth reconstruction of the contemporary and historical demographic trajectories of H. illucens emphasises benchmarking potential for applied future research on this emerging model of the prospering insect-livestock sector. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-021-01029-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cengiz Kaya
- Department of Livestock Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.,Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Gunilla Ståhls
- Zoology unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martin Hauser
- California Department of Food and Agriculture, Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch, Sacramento, USA
| | - Ana C Samayoa
- Department of Entomology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Carlos G Nunes-Silva
- Department of Genetics and Biotechnology Graduate Program, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil
| | - Heather Roxburgh
- Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Jens Wohlfahrt
- Department of Livestock Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland
| | - Ebenezer A Ewusie
- Biotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Yupa Hanboonsong
- Department of Entomology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Jesus Orozco
- Department of Agricultural Sciences and Production, Zamorano University, Zamorano, Honduras
| | - Nancy Carrejo
- Department of Biology, Universidad del Valle, Santiago de Cali, Colombia
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Crop, Livestock and Environmental Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Laura Gasco
- Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Santos Rojo
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resources, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Chrysantus M Tanga
- International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Rudolf Meier
- Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clint Rhode
- Department of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa
| | - Christine J Picard
- Department of Biology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Chris D Jiggins
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Florian Leiber
- Department of Livestock Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland
| | | | - Martin Hasselmann
- Department of Livestock Population Genomics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Wolf U Blanckenhorn
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Kapun
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Sandrock
- Department of Livestock Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ankrah NYD, Barker BE, Song J, Wu C, McMullen JG, Douglas AE. Predicted Metabolic Function of the Gut Microbiota of Drosophila melanogaster. mSystems 2021. [PMID: 33947801 DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.20.427455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
An important goal for many nutrition-based microbiome studies is to identify the metabolic function of microbes in complex microbial communities and their impact on host physiology. This research can be confounded by poorly understood effects of community composition and host diet on the metabolic traits of individual taxa. Here, we investigated these multiway interactions by constructing and analyzing metabolic models comprising every combination of five bacterial members of the Drosophila gut microbiome (from single taxa to the five-member community of Acetobacter and Lactobacillus species) under three nutrient regimes. We show that the metabolic function of Drosophila gut bacteria is dynamic, influenced by community composition, and responsive to dietary modulation. Furthermore, we show that ecological interactions such as competition and mutualism identified from the growth patterns of gut bacteria are underlain by a diversity of metabolic interactions, and show that the bacteria tend to compete for amino acids and B vitamins more frequently than for carbon sources. Our results reveal that, in addition to fermentation products such as acetate, intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, including 2-oxoglutarate and succinate, are produced at high flux and cross-fed between bacterial taxa, suggesting important roles for TCA cycle intermediates in modulating Drosophila gut microbe interactions and the potential to influence host traits. These metabolic models provide specific predictions of the patterns of ecological and metabolic interactions among gut bacteria under different nutrient regimes, with potentially important consequences for overall community metabolic function and nutritional interactions with the host.IMPORTANCE Drosophila is an important model for microbiome research partly because of the low complexity of its mostly culturable gut microbiota. Our current understanding of how Drosophila interacts with its gut microbes and how these interactions influence host traits derives almost entirely from empirical studies that focus on individual microbial taxa or classes of metabolites. These studies have failed to capture fully the complexity of metabolic interactions that occur between host and microbe. To overcome this limitation, we reconstructed and analyzed 31 metabolic models for every combination of the five principal bacterial taxa in the gut microbiome of Drosophila This revealed that metabolic interactions between Drosophila gut bacterial taxa are highly dynamic and influenced by cooccurring bacteria and nutrient availability. Our results generate testable hypotheses about among-microbe ecological interactions in the Drosophila gut and the diversity of metabolites available to influence host traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Y D Ankrah
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Brandon E Barker
- Center for Advanced Computing, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Joan Song
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Cindy Wu
- Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - John G McMullen
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Angela E Douglas
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ankrah NYD, Barker BE, Song J, Wu C, McMullen JG, Douglas AE. Predicted Metabolic Function of the Gut Microbiota of Drosophila melanogaster. mSystems 2021; 6:e01369-20. [PMID: 33947801 PMCID: PMC8269265 DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01369-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
An important goal for many nutrition-based microbiome studies is to identify the metabolic function of microbes in complex microbial communities and their impact on host physiology. This research can be confounded by poorly understood effects of community composition and host diet on the metabolic traits of individual taxa. Here, we investigated these multiway interactions by constructing and analyzing metabolic models comprising every combination of five bacterial members of the Drosophila gut microbiome (from single taxa to the five-member community of Acetobacter and Lactobacillus species) under three nutrient regimes. We show that the metabolic function of Drosophila gut bacteria is dynamic, influenced by community composition, and responsive to dietary modulation. Furthermore, we show that ecological interactions such as competition and mutualism identified from the growth patterns of gut bacteria are underlain by a diversity of metabolic interactions, and show that the bacteria tend to compete for amino acids and B vitamins more frequently than for carbon sources. Our results reveal that, in addition to fermentation products such as acetate, intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, including 2-oxoglutarate and succinate, are produced at high flux and cross-fed between bacterial taxa, suggesting important roles for TCA cycle intermediates in modulating Drosophila gut microbe interactions and the potential to influence host traits. These metabolic models provide specific predictions of the patterns of ecological and metabolic interactions among gut bacteria under different nutrient regimes, with potentially important consequences for overall community metabolic function and nutritional interactions with the host.IMPORTANCE Drosophila is an important model for microbiome research partly because of the low complexity of its mostly culturable gut microbiota. Our current understanding of how Drosophila interacts with its gut microbes and how these interactions influence host traits derives almost entirely from empirical studies that focus on individual microbial taxa or classes of metabolites. These studies have failed to capture fully the complexity of metabolic interactions that occur between host and microbe. To overcome this limitation, we reconstructed and analyzed 31 metabolic models for every combination of the five principal bacterial taxa in the gut microbiome of Drosophila This revealed that metabolic interactions between Drosophila gut bacterial taxa are highly dynamic and influenced by cooccurring bacteria and nutrient availability. Our results generate testable hypotheses about among-microbe ecological interactions in the Drosophila gut and the diversity of metabolites available to influence host traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Y D Ankrah
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Brandon E Barker
- Center for Advanced Computing, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Joan Song
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Cindy Wu
- Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - John G McMullen
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Angela E Douglas
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ruuskanen MO, Sommeria-Klein G, Havulinna AS, Niiranen TJ, Lahti L. Modelling spatial patterns in host-associated microbial communities. Environ Microbiol 2021; 23:2374-2388. [PMID: 33734553 DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Microbial communities exhibit spatial structure at different scales, due to constant interactions with their environment and dispersal limitation. While this spatial structure is often considered in studies focusing on free-living environmental communities, it has received less attention in the context of host-associated microbial communities or microbiota. The wider adoption of methods accounting for spatial variation in these communities will help to address open questions in basic microbial ecology as well as realize the full potential of microbiome-aided medicine. Here, we first overview known factors affecting the composition of microbiota across diverse host types and at different scales, with a focus on the human gut as one of the most actively studied microbiota. We outline a number of topical open questions in the field related to spatial variation and patterns. We then review the existing methodology for the spatial modelling of microbiota. We suggest that methodology from related fields, such as systems biology and macro-organismal ecology, could be adapted to obtain more accurate models of spatial structure. We further posit that methodological developments in the spatial modelling and analysis of microbiota could in turn broadly benefit theoretical and applied ecology and contribute to the development of novel industrial and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti O Ruuskanen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Aki S Havulinna
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.,Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM-HiLIFE, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teemu J Niiranen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.,Division of Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Leo Lahti
- Department of Computing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wallace MA, Coffman KA, Gilbert C, Ravindran S, Albery GF, Abbott J, Argyridou E, Bellosta P, Betancourt AJ, Colinet H, Eric K, Glaser-Schmitt A, Grath S, Jelic M, Kankare M, Kozeretska I, Loeschcke V, Montchamp-Moreau C, Ometto L, Onder BS, Orengo DJ, Parsch J, Pascual M, Patenkovic A, Puerma E, Ritchie MG, Rota-Stabelli O, Schou MF, Serga SV, Stamenkovic-Radak M, Tanaskovic M, Veselinovic MS, Vieira J, Vieira CP, Kapun M, Flatt T, González J, Staubach F, Obbard DJ. The discovery, distribution, and diversity of DNA viruses associated with Drosophila melanogaster in Europe. Virus Evol 2021; 7:veab031. [PMID: 34408913 PMCID: PMC8363768 DOI: 10.1093/ve/veab031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Drosophila melanogaster is an important model for antiviral immunity in arthropods, but very few DNA viruses have been described from the family Drosophilidae. This deficiency limits our opportunity to use natural host-pathogen combinations in experimental studies, and may bias our understanding of the Drosophila virome. Here, we report fourteen DNA viruses detected in a metagenomic analysis of 6668 pool-sequenced Drosophila, sampled from forty-seven European locations between 2014 and 2016. These include three new nudiviruses, a new and divergent entomopoxvirus, a virus related to Leptopilina boulardi filamentous virus, and a virus related to Musca domestica salivary gland hypertrophy virus. We also find an endogenous genomic copy of galbut virus, a double-stranded RNA partitivirus, segregating at very low frequency. Remarkably, we find that Drosophila Vesanto virus, a small DNA virus previously described as a bidnavirus, may be composed of up to twelve segments and thus represent a new lineage of segmented DNA viruses. Two of the DNA viruses, Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus and Drosophila Vesanto virus are relatively common, found in 2 per cent or more of wild flies. The others are rare, with many likely to be represented by a single infected fly. We find that virus prevalence in Europe reflects the prevalence seen in publicly available datasets, with Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus and Drosophila Vesanto virus the only ones commonly detectable in public data from wild-caught flies and large population cages, and the other viruses being rare or absent. These analyses suggest that DNA viruses are at lower prevalence than RNA viruses in D.melanogaster, and may be less likely to persist in laboratory cultures. Our findings go some way to redressing an earlier bias toward RNA virus studies in Drosophila, and lay the foundation needed to harness the power of Drosophila as a model system for the study of DNA viruses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Wallace
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Ashworth Laboratories, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK
| | - Kelsey A Coffman
- Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Clément Gilbert
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Sanjana Ravindran
- Ashworth Laboratories, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK
| | - Gregory F Albery
- Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jessica Abbott
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, Lund 223 62, Sweden
| | - Eliza Argyridou
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany
| | - Paola Bellosta
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, CIBIO University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, Trento 38123, Italy
- Department of Medicine & Endocrinology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Andrea J Betancourt
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK
| | - Hervé Colinet
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- UMR CNRS 6553 ECOBIO, Université de Rennes1, Rennes, France
| | - Katarina Eric
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Amanda Glaser-Schmitt
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany
| | - Sonja Grath
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany
| | - Mihailo Jelic
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Maaria Kankare
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Iryna Kozeretska
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- National Antarctic Scientific Center of Ukraine, 16 Shevchenko Avenue, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
| | - Volker Loeschcke
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology, Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 116, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark
| | - Catherine Montchamp-Moreau
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Lino Ometto
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy
| | - Banu Sebnem Onder
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dorcas J Orengo
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - John Parsch
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany
| | - Marta Pascual
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aleksandra Patenkovic
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Eva Puerma
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael G Ritchie
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Centre for Biological Diversity, St Andrews University, St Andrews HY15 4SS, UK
| | - Omar Rota-Stabelli
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Research and Innovation Center, Fondazione E. Mach, San Michele all’Adige (TN) 38010, Italy
- Centre Agriculture Food Environment, University of Trento, San Michele all’Adige (TN) 38010, Italy
| | - Mads Fristrup Schou
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology, Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, Lund 223 62, Sweden
- Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Svitlana V Serga
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- National Antarctic Scientific Center of Ukraine, 16 Shevchenko Avenue, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
- Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64 Volodymyrska str, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine
| | - Marina Stamenkovic-Radak
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Marija Tanaskovic
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stankovic”, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Marija Savic Veselinovic
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Jorge Vieira
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, i3S, Porto, Portugal
| | - Cristina P Vieira
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, i3S, Porto, Portugal
| | - Martin Kapun
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Division of Cell & Developmental Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Flatt
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg CH-1700, Switzerland
| | - Josefa González
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabian Staubach
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79104, Germany
| | - Darren J Obbard
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Ashworth Laboratories, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kapopoulou A, Kapun M, Pieper B, Pavlidis P, Wilches R, Duchen P, Stephan W, Laurent S. Demographic analyses of a new sample of haploid genomes from a Swedish population of Drosophila melanogaster. Sci Rep 2020; 10:22415. [PMID: 33376238 PMCID: PMC7772335 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79720-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
European and African natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster have been the focus of several studies aiming at inferring demographic and adaptive processes based on genetic variation data. However, in these analyses little attention has been given to gene flow between African and European samples. Here we present a dataset consisting of 14 fully sequenced haploid genomes sampled from a natural population from the northern species range (Umeå, Sweden). We co-analyzed this new data with an African population to compare the likelihood of several competing demographic scenarios for European and African populations and show that gene flow improves the fit of demographic models to data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adamandia Kapopoulou
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin Kapun
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Cell and Developmental Biology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Département de Biologie, Université de Fribourg, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Bjorn Pieper
- Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Köln, Germany
| | - Pavlos Pavlidis
- Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Crete, Greece
| | - Ricardo Wilches
- Section of Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology II, University of Munich, 82152, Planegg, Germany
| | - Pablo Duchen
- Department of Computational Biology, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Stephan
- Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Natural History Museum, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Laurent
- Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829, Köln, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kapun M, Barrón MG, Staubach F, Obbard DJ, Wiberg RAW, Vieira J, Goubert C, Rota-Stabelli O, Kankare M, Bogaerts-Márquez M, Haudry A, Waidele L, Kozeretska I, Pasyukova EG, Loeschcke V, Pascual M, Vieira CP, Serga S, Montchamp-Moreau C, Abbott J, Gibert P, Porcelli D, Posnien N, Sánchez-Gracia A, Grath S, Sucena É, Bergland AO, Guerreiro MPG, Onder BS, Argyridou E, Guio L, Schou MF, Deplancke B, Vieira C, Ritchie MG, Zwaan BJ, Tauber E, Orengo DJ, Puerma E, Aguadé M, Schmidt P, Parsch J, Betancourt AJ, Flatt T, González J. Genomic Analysis of European Drosophila melanogaster Populations Reveals Longitudinal Structure, Continent-Wide Selection, and Previously Unknown DNA Viruses. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:2661-2678. [PMID: 32413142 PMCID: PMC7475034 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msaa120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic variation is the fuel of evolution, with standing genetic variation especially important for short-term evolution and local adaptation. To date, studies of spatiotemporal patterns of genetic variation in natural populations have been challenging, as comprehensive sampling is logistically difficult, and sequencing of entire populations costly. Here, we address these issues using a collaborative approach, sequencing 48 pooled population samples from 32 locations, and perform the first continent-wide genomic analysis of genetic variation in European Drosophila melanogaster. Our analyses uncover longitudinal population structure, provide evidence for continent-wide selective sweeps, identify candidate genes for local climate adaptation, and document clines in chromosomal inversion and transposable element frequencies. We also characterize variation among populations in the composition of the fly microbiome, and identify five new DNA viruses in our samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Kapun
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Division of Cell and Developmental Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maite G Barrón
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabian Staubach
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Darren J Obbard
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - R Axel W Wiberg
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Zoological Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jorge Vieira
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (I3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Clément Goubert
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
| | - Omar Rota-Stabelli
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all’ Adige, Italy
| | - Maaria Kankare
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - María Bogaerts-Márquez
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Annabelle Haudry
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Lena Waidele
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Iryna Kozeretska
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- General and Medical Genetics Department, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
- State Institution National Antarctic Scientific Center of Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Elena G Pasyukova
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Laboratory of Genome Variation, Institute of Molecular Genetics of RAS, Moscow, Russia
| | - Volker Loeschcke
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Bioscience—Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Marta Pascual
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina P Vieira
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (I3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Svitlana Serga
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- General and Medical Genetics Department, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Catherine Montchamp-Moreau
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Jessica Abbott
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Patricia Gibert
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Damiano Porcelli
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Nico Posnien
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institut für Zoologie und Anthropologie, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alejandro Sánchez-Gracia
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonja Grath
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany
| | - Élio Sucena
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
- Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Alan O Bergland
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Maria Pilar Garcia Guerreiro
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica i Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Banu Sebnem Onder
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Eliza Argyridou
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany
| | - Lain Guio
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mads Fristrup Schou
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Bioscience—Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
- Section for Evolutionary Ecology, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bart Deplancke
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute of Bio-engineering, School of Life Sciences, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Vieira
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Michael G Ritchie
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland
| | - Bas J Zwaan
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Laboratory of Genetics, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Eran Tauber
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dorcas J Orengo
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Puerma
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Aguadé
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Departament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul Schmidt
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John Parsch
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg, Germany
| | - Andrea J Betancourt
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Behaviour, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Flatt
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Josefa González
- The European Drosophila Population Genomics Consortium (DrosEU)
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|