1
|
Westafer LM, Beck SA, Simon C, Potee B, Soares WE, Schoenfeld EM. Barriers and Facilitators to Harm Reduction for Opioid Use Disorder: A Qualitative Study of People With Lived Experience. Ann Emerg Med 2024; 83:340-350. [PMID: 38180403 PMCID: PMC10960719 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Although an increasing number of emergency departments (ED) offer opioid agonist treatment, naloxone, and other harm reduction measures, little is known about patient perspectives on harm reduction practices delivered in the ED. The objective of this study was to identify patient-focused barriers and facilitators to harm reduction strategies in the ED. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of individuals in Massachusetts diagnosed with opioid use disorder. We developed an interview guide, and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process using reflexive thematic analysis. After initial interviews and coding, we triangulated the results among a focus group of 4 individuals with lived experience. RESULTS We interviewed 25 participants with opioid use disorder, 6 recruited from 1 ED and 19 recruited from opioid agonist treatment clinics. Key themes included accessibility of harm reduction supplies, lack of self-care resulting from withdrawal and hopelessness, the impact of stigma on the likelihood of using harm reduction practices, habit and knowledge, as well as the need for user-centered harm reduction interventions. CONCLUSION In this study, people with lived experience discussed the characteristics and need for user-centered harm reduction strategies in the ED that centered on reducing stigma, treatment of withdrawal, and availability of harm reduction materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M Westafer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA; Department for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
| | | | - Caty Simon
- National Survivors Union, Greensboro, NC; Whose Corner Is It Anyway, Holyoke, MA
| | | | - William E Soares
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA; Department for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| | - Elizabeth M Schoenfeld
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA; Department for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin CH, Siao SF, Lin PY, Shelley M, Chi YC, Lee YH. Understanding Healthcare Providers' Care for Patients with Medications Treating Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review. Subst Use Misuse 2024; 59:622-637. [PMID: 38115559 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2294964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited research exploring the changing clinical practices among healthcare providers (HPs) care for patients with Emergency Department (ED)-initiated Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD). METHODS This scoping review followed the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley to map relevant evidence and synthesize the findings. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus for related studies from inception through October 12, 2022. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 studies were included. Subsequently, they were charted and analyzed thematically based on ecological systems theory. RESULTS The main determinants in the four ecological systems were generated as follows: (1) microsystem: willingness and attitude, professional competence, readiness, and preference; (2) mesosystem: ED clinical practices, departmental factors; (3) exosystem: multidisciplinary approaches, discharge planning, and (4) macrosystem: stigma, health insurance, policy. The findings have implications for HPs and researchers, as insufficient adoption, implementation, and retention of MOUD in the ED affect clinical practices. CONCLUSIONS Across the four ecological systems, ED-initiated MOUD is shaped by multifaceted determinants. The microsystem underscores pivotal patient-HP trust dynamics, while the mesosystem emphasizes interdepartmental synergies. Exosystemically, resource allocation and standardized training remain paramount. The macrosystem reveals profound effects of stigma, insurance disparities, and evolving policies on treatment access and efficacy. Addressing these interconnected barriers is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes in the context of MOUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Hung Lin
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Fen Siao
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Ying Lin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mack Shelley
- Department of Political Science, Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Yu-Chi Chi
- Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Han Lee
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Azar P, Wong JSH, Mathew N, Ignaszewski MJ, Partovi N, Krausz RM, Ajidahun A, Thotakura S, Harris M, Barrios R, Montaner JSG, Maharaj AR. 48-hour Induction of Transdermal Buprenorphine to Extended-release Buprenorphine. J Addict Med 2024; 18:82-85. [PMID: 37847573 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Buprenorphine extended-release (BUP-XR) provides sustained delivery of buprenorphine to control withdrawal and craving symptoms in the form of a monthly injectable and has been shown to improve health outcomes in patients with opioid use disorder. It is recommended that patients are stabilized with a transmucosal buprenorphine product, for at least 7 days per the product monograph; however, clinically, this timeline may be expedited. We report a case of a hospitalized patient with unregulated fentanyl use who underwent a successful transdermal buprenorphine induction for 48 hours to initiate BUP-XR with minimal levels of withdrawal and without precipitating opioid withdrawal. The approach described could provide a practical, patient-centered, accelerated induction strategy that, once independently validated, could considerably facilitate the use of BUP-XR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouya Azar
- From the Integrated Psychiatry, Pain, and Addiction Service, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PA, JSHW, NM, MJI); Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (PA, NM); Addictions and Concurrent Disorders Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (JSHW, RMK); BC Mental Health & Substance Use Services, Provincial Health Services Authority, British Columbia, Canada (NM); Substance Use Response and Facilitation Service, BC Children's Hospital, Provincial Health Services Authority, British Columbia, Canada (MJI); Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (NP); Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (NP); British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (AA, MH, RB, JSGM); Pharmacokinetics Modeling and Simulation Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (ST, ARM); Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (MH); School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (RB); and Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (JSGM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mahone A, Enich M, Treitler P, Lloyd J, Crystal S. Opioid use disorder treatment and the role of New Jersey Medicaid policy changes: perspectives of office-based buprenorphine providers. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2023; 49:606-617. [PMID: 37506336 PMCID: PMC10826857 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2023.2234075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Background: In the US, seventy percent of drug-related deaths are attributed to opioids. In response to the ongoing opioid crisis, New Jersey's (NJ) Medicaid program implemented the MATrx model to increase treatment access for Medicaid participants with opioid use disorder (OUD). The model's goals include increasing the number of office-based treatment providers, enhancing Medicaid reimbursement for certain treatment services, and elimination of prior authorizations for OUD medications.Objectives: To explore office-based addiction treatment providers' experiences delivering care in the context of statewide policy changes and their perspectives on treatment access changes and remaining barriers.Methods: This qualitative study used purposive sampling to recruit office-based New Jersey medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) providers . Twenty-two providers (11 females, 11 males) discussed treatment experiences since the policy changes in 2019, including evaluations of the current state of OUD care in New Jersey and perceived outcomes of the MATrx model policy changes.Results: Providers reported the MOUD climate in NJ improved as Medicaid implemented policies intended to reduce barriers to care and increase treatment access. Elimination of prior authorizations was noted as important, as it reduced provider burden and allowed greater focus on care delivery. However, barriers remained, including stigma, pharmacy supply issues, and difficulty obtaining injectable or non-generic medication formulations.Conclusion: NJ policies may have improved access to care for Medicaid beneficiaries by reducing barriers to care and supporting providers in prescribing MOUD. Yet, stigma and lack of psychosocial supports still need to be addressed to further improve access and care quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anais Mahone
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - Michael Enich
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - Peter Treitler
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - James Lloyd
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - Stephen Crystal
- Center for Health Services Research, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 112 Paterson St. 3rd Floor, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St. New Brunswick, NJ 08901
- School of Public Health, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 683 Hoes Lane West. Piscataway, NJ 08854
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rasmussen MLT, Lomborg K, Konradsen H. Patient involvement in decisions about discharge from the emergency department: A qualitative interview study of the healthcare professionals' experiences. Int Emerg Nurs 2023; 69:101307. [PMID: 37267846 DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2023.101307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients in the emergency department are less involved in making decisions than they would like to be. Involving patients improves health-related outcomes, but success depends on the healthcare professional's ability to act in a patient-involving manner, and therefore more knowledge is needed about the healthcare professional's perspective of involving patients in the decisions. AIM To explore what challenges healthcare professionals experience in their daily practice regarding patient involvement in decisions when planning discharge from the emergency department. METHOD Five focus group interviews were conducted with nurses and physicians. The data were analyzed using content analysis. FINDINGS The healthcare professionals described how they experienced that there is no choice to offer the patients in the clinical practice. First, they had to manage the department's routines, which directed them to focus on acute needs and avoid overcrowding. Second, it was too difficult to navigate the diversity of patients with different characteristics. Third, they wanted to guard the patient from a lack of genuine options. CONCLUSION The healthcare professionals experienced patient involvement as incompatible with professionalism. If patient involvement is to be practiced, then new initiatives are needed to improve the conversation with the individual patient about decisions regarding their discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kirsten Lomborg
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
| | - Hanne Konradsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, 2750 Herlev, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Galarneau LR, Scheuermeyer FX, Hilburt J, O'Neill ZR, Barbic S, Moe J, Buxton JA, Orkin AM, Kaczorowski J, Dong K, Tobin D, Miles I, Bath M, Grier S, Garrod E, Kestler A. Qualitative Exploration of Emergency Department Care Experiences Among People With Opioid Use Disorder. Ann Emerg Med 2023; 82:1-10. [PMID: 36967276 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We described the experiences and preferences of people with opioid use disorder who access emergency department (ED) services regarding ED care and ED-based interventions. METHODS Between June and September 2020, we conducted phone or in-person semistructured qualitative interviews with patients recently discharged from 2 urban EDs in Vancouver, BC, Canada, to explore experiences and preferences of ED care and ED-based opioid use disorder interventions. We recruited participants from a cohort of adults with opioid use disorder who were participating in an ED-initiated outreach program. We transcribed audio recordings verbatim. We iteratively developed a thematic coding structure, with interim analyses to assess for thematic saturation. Two team members with lived experience of opioid use provided feedback on content, wording, and analysis throughout the study. RESULTS We interviewed 19 participants. Participants felt discriminated against for their drug use, which led to poorer perceived health care and downstream ED avoidance. Participants desired to be treated like ED patients who do not use drugs and to be more involved in their ED care. Participants nevertheless felt comfortable discussing their substance use with ED staff and valued continuous ED operating hours. Regarding opioid use disorder treatment, participants supported ED-based buprenorphine/naloxone programs but also suggested additional options (eg, different initiation regimens and settings and other opioid agonist therapies) to facilitate further treatment uptake. CONCLUSION Based on participant experiences, we recommend addressing potentially stigmatizing practices, increasing patient involvement in their care during ED visits, and increasing access to various opioid use disorder-related treatments and community support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lexis R Galarneau
- George Spady Society, Edmonton, Alberta; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
| | - Frank X Scheuermeyer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Jesse Hilburt
- Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Zoe R O'Neill
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec
| | - Skye Barbic
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Providence Health Research, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Jessica Moe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, and Vancouver General Hospital and British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia; British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Jane A Buxton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Aaron M Orkin
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, and Inner City Health Associates, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Janusz Kaczorowski
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, University of Montréal, and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec
| | - Kathryn Dong
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Dianne Tobin
- Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Isabelle Miles
- Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Misty Bath
- Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Sherry Grier
- Portland Hotel Society Community Services Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Emma Garrod
- Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew Kestler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia; Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia; British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jawa R, Tin Y, Nall S, Calcaterra SL, Savinkina A, Marks LR, Kimmel SD, Linas BP, Barocas JA. Estimated Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Provision of Addiction Treatment in US Primary Care Clinics. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e237888. [PMID: 37043198 PMCID: PMC10098970 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance US primary care practitioners (PCPs) are the largest clinical workforce, but few provide addiction care. Primary care is a practical place to expand addiction services, including buprenorphine and harm reduction kits, yet the clinical outcomes and health care sector costs are unknown. Objective To estimate the long-term clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of integrated buprenorphine and harm reduction kits in primary care for people who inject opioids. Design, Setting, and Participants In this modeling study, the Reducing Infections Related to Drug Use Cost-Effectiveness (REDUCE) microsimulation model, which tracks serious injection-related infections, overdose, hospitalization, and death, was used to examine the following treatment strategies: (1) PCP services with external referral to addiction care (status quo), (2) PCP services plus onsite buprenorphine prescribing with referral to offsite harm reduction kits (BUP), and (3) PCP services plus onsite buprenorphine prescribing and harm reduction kits (BUP plus HR). Model inputs were derived from clinical trials and observational cohorts, and costs were discounted annually at 3%. The cost-effectiveness was evaluated over a lifetime from the modified health care sector perspective, and sensitivity analyses were performed to address uncertainty. Model simulation began January 1, 2021, and ran for the entire lifetime of the cohort. Main Outcomes and Measures Life-years (LYs), hospitalizations, mortality from sequelae (overdose, severe skin and soft tissue infections, and endocarditis), costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results The simulated cohort included 2.25 million people and reflected the age and gender of US persons who inject opioids. Status quo resulted in 6.56 discounted LYs at a discounted cost of $203 500 per person (95% credible interval, $203 000-$222 000). Each strategy extended discounted life expectancy: BUP by 0.16 years and BUP plus HR by 0.17 years. Compared with status quo, BUP plus HR reduced sequelae-related mortality by 33%. The mean discounted lifetime cost per person of BUP and BUP plus HR were more than that of the status quo strategy. The dominating strategy was BUP plus HR. Compared with status quo, BUP plus HR was cost-effective (ICER, $34 400 per LY). During a 5-year time horizon, BUP plus HR cost an individual PCP practice approximately $13 000. Conclusions and Relevance This modeling study of integrated addiction service in primary care found improved clinical outcomes and modestly increased costs. The integration of addiction service into primary care practices should be a health care system priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raagini Jawa
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Healthcare, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yjuliana Tin
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samantha Nall
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Susan L. Calcaterra
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Alexandra Savinkina
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Laura R. Marks
- Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, Missouri
| | - Simeon D. Kimmel
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin P. Linas
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua A. Barocas
- Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Faude S, Delgado MK, Perrone J, McFadden R, Xiong RA, O'Donnell N, Wood C, Solomon G, Lowenstein M. Variability in opioid use disorder clinical presentations and treatment in the emergency department: A mixed-methods study. Am J Emerg Med 2023; 66:53-60. [PMID: 36706482 PMCID: PMC10038883 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is strong evidence for emergency department (ED)-initiated treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). However, implementation is variable, and ED management of OUD may differ by clinical presentation. Our aim was to use mixed methods to explore variation in ED-based OUD care by patient clinical presentation and understand barriers and facilitators to ED implementation of OUD treatment across scenarios. METHODS We analyzed treatment outcomes in OUD-related visits within three urban, academic EDs from 12/2018 to 7/2020 following the implementation of interventions to increase ED-initiated OUD treatment. We assessed differences in treatment with medications for OUD (MOUDs) by clinical presentation (overdose, withdrawal, others). These data were integrated with results from 5 focus groups conducted with 28 ED physicians and nurses January to April 2020 to provide a richer understanding of clinician perspectives on caring for ED patients with OUD. RESULTS Of the 1339 total opioid-related visits, there were 265 (20%) visits for overdose, 123 (9%) for withdrawal, and 951 (71%) for other OUD-related conditions. 23% of patients received MOUDs during their visit or at discharge. Treatment with MOUDs was least common in overdose presentations (6%) and most common in withdrawal presentations (69%, p < 0.001). Buprenorphine was prescribed at discharge in 15% of visits, including 42% of withdrawal visits, 14% of other OUD-related visits, and 5% of overdose visits (p < 0.001). In focus groups, clinicians highlighted variation in ED presentations among patients with OUD. Clinicians also highlighted key aspects necessary for successful treatment initiation including perceived patient receptivity, provider confidence, and patient clinical readiness. CONCLUSIONS ED-based treatment of OUD differed by clinical presentation. Clinician focus groups identified several areas where targeted guidance or novel approaches may improve current practices. These results highlight the need for tailored clinical guidance and can inform health system and policy interventions seeking to increase ED-initiated treatment for OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Faude
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - M Kit Delgado
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Rachel McFadden
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Ruiying Aria Xiong
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Nicole O'Donnell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America. Nicole.O'
| | - Christian Wood
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Gabrielle Solomon
- School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Margaret Lowenstein
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Enhancing Patient Choice: Using Self-administered Intranasal Naloxone for Novel Rapid Buprenorphine Initiation. J Addict Med 2023; 17:237-240. [PMID: 36149001 PMCID: PMC10022654 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) is a lifesaving treatment for opioid use disorder. The increasing use of illicitly manufactured fentanyl, however, has made initiating BUP-NX more likely to precipitate withdrawal-an experience that deters treatment and causes return to use. If BUP-NX cannot be successfully started, it cannot work. We describe the case of a patient who was able to transition to a therapeutic dose of BUP-NX less than 3 hours after his last illicitly manufactured fentanyl use by choosing to self-administer intranasal naloxone. After the naloxone, the transition took 31 minutes, including 14 minutes of expected moderately severe withdrawal. He remains in care with BUP-NX and would recommend this transition approach to others.
Collapse
|