Prevention and therapy of alcohol withdrawal on intensive care units: systematic review of controlled trials

Delirium in Neurocritical Care: Uncovering Undisclosed Psychotropic Substance and Medication Use and Stress Exposure by Hair Analysis

OBJECTIVE

In intensive care, delirium is frequent, prolongs the stay, increases health care costs, and worsens patient outcome. Several substances and medications as well as stress can impact the risk of delirium; however, assessment of previous exposure to psychotropic agents and stress by self-reports or third-party information is not always reliable. Hair analysis can be used to objectively assess medication and substance use (including chronic alcohol consumption), and allows for the determination of stress-related long-term changes in steroid hormones and endocannabinoids.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with acute brain injury admitted to the neurocritical care unit were included. Delirium was diagnosed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was used to investigate psychoactive substances and medications, ethyl glucuronide, steroid hormones, and endocannabinoids in hair samples. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to reveal any associations with the occurrence of delirium.

RESULTS

Of 50 consecutive patients, 21 (42%) were diagnosed with delirium. Detection of antipsychotics or antidepressants in hair was more frequent in patients with delirium (antidepressants: 43% vs. 14%, p = 0.040; antipsychotics: 29% vs. 0%, p = 0.021). These patients also displayed higher ethyl glucuronide levels (p = 0.049). Anandamide (AEA) concentrations were higher in patients with delirium (p = 0.005), whereas oleoylethanolamide (p = 0.045) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) (p = 0.017) concentrations were lower in patients with delirium. Backward stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed antidepressants and AEA/PEA to be independent relevant predictors of delirium.

CONCLUSIONS

Hair analysis provides crucial and otherwise unattainable information regarding chronic stress and the use of psychotropic substances and medications. Undisclosed antidepressant/antipsychotic use or intense chronic alcohol consumption is susceptible to treatment (continuation of medication or provision of low-dose benzodiazepines in case of alcohol). Chronic stress can be evaluated using stress markers and endocannabinoids in hair, potentially allowing for personalized delirium risk stratification and preventive measures.

SAEM GRACE: Phenobarbital for alcohol withdrawal management in the emergency department: A systematic review of direct evidence

OBJECTIVES

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a commonly presenting condition in the emergency department (ED) and can have severe complications, including mortality. Benzodiazepines are first-line medications for treating AWS but may be unavailable or insufficient. This systematic review evaluates the direct evidence assessing the utility of phenobarbital for treating AWS in the ED.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted and designed according to the patient-intervention-comparator-outcome (PICO) question: (P) adults (≥18 years old) presenting to the ED with alcohol withdrawal; (I) phenobarbital (including adjunctive); (C) benzodiazepines or no intervention; and (O) AWS complications, admission to a monitored setting, control of symptoms, adverse effects, and adjunctive medications. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and conducted risk of bias assessments for included studies.

RESULTS

From 70 potentially relevant articles, seven studies met inclusion criteria: three retrospective cohort studies, two retrospective chart reviews, and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one examining phenobarbital monotherapy and one examining adjunctive phenobarbital. Across the retrospective cohort studies, treatment of AWS with phenobarbital resulted in lower odds of a subsequent ED visit. The retrospective chart reviews indicated that phenobarbital was associated with higher discharge rate compared to benzodiazepine-only treatments. For the two RCTs, phenobarbital did not differ significantly from benzodiazepine for most outcomes, although concomitant treatment with phenobarbital was associated with lower benzodiazepine use and intensive care unit admission. The heterogeneous designs and small number of studies prevented quantitative synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively few studies provide direct evidence on the utility of phenobarbital for AWS in the ED, but the evidence that exists generally suggests that it is a reasonable and appropriate approach. Additional RCTs and other methodologically rigorous investigations are needed for more definitive direct evidence.

Prevention of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the surgical ICU: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee Clinical Consensus Document

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome is a common and challenging clinical entity present in trauma and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The screening tools, assessment strategies, and pharmacological methods for preventing alcohol withdrawal have significantly changed during the past 20 years. This Clinical Consensus Document created by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee reviews the best practices for screening, monitoring, and prophylactic treatment of alcohol withdrawal in the surgical ICU.

Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapies for alcohol withdrawal: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There have been few head-to-head clinical trials of pharmacotherapies for alcohol withdrawal (AW). We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the comparative performance of pharmacotherapies for AW.

METHODS

Six databases were searched for randomized clinical trials through November 2021. Trials were included after a blinded review by two independent reviewers. Outcomes included incident seizures, delirium tremens, AW severity scores, adverse events, dropouts, dropouts from adverse events, length of hospital stay, use of additional medications, total benzodiazepine requirements, and death. Effect sizes were pooled using frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis models to generate summary ORs and Cohen's d standardized mean differences (SMDs).

RESULTS

Across the 149 trials, there were 10 692 participants (76% male, median 43.5 years old). AW severity spanned mild (n = 32), moderate (n = 51), and severe (n = 66). Fixed-schedule chlormethiazole (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.65), fixed-schedule diazepam (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.59), fixed-schedule lorazepam (OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.45), fixed-schedule chlordiazepoxide (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08-0.53), and divalproex (OR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05-0.86) were superior to placebo at reducing incident AW seizures. However, only fixed-schedule diazepam (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.76) reduced incident delirium tremens. Oxcarbazepine (d = -3.69; 95% CI, -6.21 to -1.17), carbamazepine (d = -2.76; 95% CI, -4.13 to -1.40), fixed-schedule oxazepam (d = -2.55; 95% CI, -4.26 to -0.83), and γ-hydroxybutyrate (d = -1.80; 95% CI, -3.35 to -0.26) improved endpoint Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-Revised scores over placebo. Promazine and carbamazepine were the only agents significantly associated with greater dropouts because of adverse events. The quality of evidence was downgraded because of the substantial risk of bias, heterogeneity, inconsistency, and imprecision.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some pharmacotherapeutic modalities, particularly benzodiazepines, appear to be safe and efficacious for reducing some measures of alcohol withdrawal, methodological issues and a high risk of bias prevent a consistent estimate of their comparative performance.

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in ICU patients: Clinical features, management, and outcome predictors

Background

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a common condition in hospitalized patients, yet its epidemiology in the ICU remains poorly characterized.

Methods

Retrospective cohort of patients admitted to the Nantes University Hospital ICU between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, and coded for AWS using ICD-10 criteria. The objective of the study was to identify factors associated with complicated hospital stay defined as ICU length of stay ≥7 days or hospital mortality.

Results

Among 5,641 patients admitted to the ICU during the study period, 246 (4.4%) were coded as having AWS. Among them, 42 had exclusion criteria and 204 were included in the study. The three main reasons for ICU admission were sepsis (29.9%), altered consciousness (29.4%), and seizures (24%). At ICU admission, median Cushman’s score was 6 [4–9] and median SOFA score was 3 [2–6]. Delirium tremens occurred in half the patients, seizures in one fifth and pneumonia in one third. Overall, 48% of patients developed complicated hospital stay, of whom 92.8% stayed in the ICU for ≥7 days, 36.7% received MV for ≥7 days, and 16.3% died during hospital stay. By multivariable analysis, two factors were associated with complicated hospital stay: a higher number of organ dysfunctions at ICU admission was associated with a higher risk of complicated hospital stay (OR, 1.18; 95CI, 1.05–1.32, P = 0.005), whereas ICU admission for seizures was associated with a lower risk of complicated hospital stay (OR, 0.14; 95%CI, 0.026–0.80; P = 0.026).

Conclusions

AWS in ICU patients chiefly affects young adults and is often associated with additional factors such as sepsis, trauma, or surgery. Half the patients experienced an extended ICU stay or death during the hospital stay. The likelihood of developing complicated hospital stay relied on the reason for ICU admission and the number of organ dysfunctions at ICU admission.

The impact of alcohol use and withdrawal on trauma outcomes: A case control study

INTRODUCTION

Many patients admitted to hospitals with acute trauma have positive serum blood alcohol levels. Published associations between alcohol use, injury patterns, and outcomes are inconsistent. We sought to further delineate the impact of alcohol use and alcohol withdrawal on hospital outcomes amongst acute trauma patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of adult trauma patients hospitalized at a suburban level 1 trauma center between January 2015 and September 2019 with a blood alcohol level measurement and/or classification as alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Patients were separated into three groups: BAL ≤10 mg/dL, BAL >10 mg/dL, and alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS).

RESULTS

Overall, 3896 patients met study criteria with 75.6% BAL ≤10, 23.2% BAL >10, and 1.2% AWS. The median age was significantly different (BAL ≤ 10: 59 years, BAL > 10: 44 years, AWS: 53.5 years). Alcohol withdrawal was experienced by patients with BAL ≤10 and BAL >10. While injury severity and mortality were similar across all 3 groups, AWS patients experienced significantly longer hospital and ICU lengths of stay, unplanned ICU admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and higher rates of complications. Patients with AWS had high rates of acute neuropsychiatric symptoms, complicating their management.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for mortality, AWS patients experienced worse outcomes. The complex nature of alcohol withdrawal cases, including the possibility of developing AWS despite a negative BAL on admission, emphasizes the need for early assessment for alcohol withdrawal risk factors and input from specialists.

ATS Core Curriculum 2020. Adult Critical Care Medicine

The American Thoracic Society Core Curriculum updates clinicians annually in adult and pediatric pulmonary disease, medical critical care, and sleep medicine, in a 3- to 4-year recurring cycle of topics. These topics will be presented at the 2020 International Conference. Below is the adult critical care medicine core including complications of chemotherapy, acute-on-chronic liver failure, alcohol withdrawal syndrome, mechanical circulatory support, direct oral anticoagulants, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and vasopressor selection.

Perioperative Management of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome

Background

In the perioperative course, alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) can occur in any setting, especially in aero-digestive and acute trauma surgery. Challenging issues are the overlap of other forms of delirium in perioperative and intensive care settings as well as general anesthesia masking the onset of withdrawal symptoms. In contrast to other etiologies of delirium, the pathophysiology and thus treatment strategy of AWS is different: the key point is the tolerance to GABAergic molecules of alcohol-dependent subjects resulting in central nervous hyperactivity once the effect of alcohol or other GABA-stimulating agents is decreased.

Summary

Despite limitations due to insufficient accuracy of self-reporting questionnaires and limited feasibility in emergency settings, the AUDIT and the shortened AUDIT-C are the standard tools for detection of alcohol use disorders (AUD), as well as predicting AWS risk and severity in approximately half of these AUD patients. The most important risk factors for AWS are a high blood alcohol concentration at hospital admission, AWS episodes in medical history, and lack of control of alcohol use. Patients considered at risk for severe AWS must be treated with prophylactic medication before the onset of symptoms. Thiamine supplementation is required for all malnourished alcohol-dependent patients. Writing down alcohol-related diagnoses in the medical records requires the patient's presumed consent after shared decision-making. These reports should remain strictly confidential if the patient desires. Psychological support for the perioperative period as well as the following course should be offered to all AUD patients including support in short- and long-term detoxification. Alternative diagnoses must be ruled out with no timely delay, especially if fever and coma are the leading symptoms. The backbone of AWS therapy is the symptom-triggered administration of intravenous benzodiazepines (BZO) in escalating doses until the aimed revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale (CIWA-Ar) or Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score is achieved. Clonidine, dexmedetomidine, baclofen, ketamine, and neuroleptics may be used as symptom-orientated adjuncts. The therapeutic administration of ethanol or clomethiazole is considered to be harmful in critically ill patients after the onset of AWS. General supportive and intensive care including high-dose thiamine supplementation are mandatory in severe AWS cases. The timely differential diagnosis of delirium is important - and AWS is a diagnosis of exclusion - because BZO are strongly recommended for AWS patients but may not be the treatment of choice in other etiologies of delirium.

Key Messages

Screening for AWS risk factors should be integrated in the preoperative and emergency assessment. Other severe diagnoses must be ruled out before the diagnosis of AWS can be established. Preventive treatment should be given to high-risk patients scoring positive for AUD and for patients with a lack of alcohol use control. The principles of AWS therapy are symptom-orientated doses of BZO and as adjuncts α₂-agonists, neuroleptics, and others guided by repeated reassessment with validated tools and thiamine administration. Length of stay and morbidity are reduced if AWS therapy is symptom-orientated and protocol-based.

WFSBP * and IAWMH ** Guidelines for the treatment of alcohol use disorders in pregnant women

OBJECTIVES

These practice guidelines for the treatment of alcohol use disorders during pregnancy were developed by members of the International Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry and the International Association for Women's Mental Health.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of all available publications and extracted data from national and international guidelines. The Task Force evaluated the data with respect to the strength of evidence for the efficacy and safety of each medication.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There is no safe level of alcohol use during pregnancy. Abstinence is recommended. Ideally, women should stop alcohol use when pregnancy is planned and, in any case, as soon as pregnancy is known. Detecting patterns of alcohol maternal drinking should be systematically conducted at first antenatal visit and throughout pregnancy. Brief interventions are recommended in the case of low or moderate risk of alcohol use. Low doses of benzodiazepines, for the shortest duration, may be used to prevent alcohol withdrawal symptoms when high and chronic alcohol intake is stopped and hospitalisation is recommended. Due to the low level of evidence and/or to low benefit/risk ratio, pharmacological treatment for maintenance of abstinence should not be used during pregnancy. At birth, foetal alcohol spectrum disorders must be searched for, and alcohol metabolites should be measured in meconium of neonates in any doubt of foetal alcohol exposure.

[Diagnosis, differential diagnosis and therapy of substance use disorders in general hospital (general section)]

Substance use disorders are becoming an increasingly significant problem in general hospitals and hence play a key role in consultation- and liaison psychiatry. Diverse psychotropic effects of various substances mimic psychiatric disorders. An alcohol intoxication can present depressive or manic symptoms, a cannabis delirium can present as a psychosis while stimulants use can suggest the diagnosis of an anxiety disorder. Obtaining dual diagnoses by identifying substance-induced and non-substance-induced psychopathologies is clinically challenging.The aim of this article is to systematically describe the psychopathology, pathophysiology and therapeutic options of substance-use disorders particularly relevant for consultation and liaison psychiatry.

The Assessment and Management Practices of Acute Alcohol Withdrawal: Results of a Nationwide Survey of Critical Care Pharmacists

Background: Alcohol withdrawal occurs commonly but diagnosis and therapies have not been described. Objective: To characterize practices regarding the assessment and treatment of acute severe alcohol withdrawal and describe perceived barriers to therapies. Methods: A random sample of 500 US-based critical care pharmacists received the pretested, electronically distributed questionnaire. Results: 94 (20%) of 471 eligible recipients responded with diverse representation. Manifestations of alcohol withdrawal that were commonly rated as severe were seizures (91.3%), not oriented to person/place/date (84.1%), delusions (73.8%), diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg (51.7%), inconsolable agitation (50.7%), and tachycardia (50.7%). Scoring tools were considered highly effective for assessing severity by 43 respondents (45.8%). Management protocols existed in 86 (90.5%) institutions. Sixty-eight (72.3%) respondents indicated protocols were used often/routinely for initial management but only 23 (24.5%) for adjunctive therapies (p<0.0001). Agents employed for initial and adjunctive management were benzodiazepines (92.6% and 61.7%, respectively, p<0.0001), clonidine (29.8% and 34%, respectively), haloperidol (26.6% and 33%, respectively), and barbiturates (20.2% and 24.5%, respectively). Adjunctive agents were most commonly added to reduce dosages of benzodiazepines (antipsychotics, barbiturates, alpha-2 agonists), prevent respiratory depression (alpha-2 agonists), prevent or treat autonomic symptoms (alpha-2 agonists), and prevent or treat agitation/delusions (antipsychotics, barbiturates, alpha-2 agonists). Agents with common barriers to use were dexmedetomidine (bradycardia, hypotension, cost), propofol (hypotension, tracheal intubation required), and ketamine (lack of supportive data). Conclusion: Assessment and management strategies of acute severe alcohol withdrawal vary considerably. Benzodiazepines are the mainstay of treatment. Other agents are commonly used to prevent complications from benzodiazepines or treat agitation/delusions.

Impact of an Alcohol Withdrawal Treatment Pathway on Hospital Length of Stay: A Retrospective Observational Study Comparing Pre and Post Pathway Implementation

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the implementation of a hospital-specific alcohol withdrawal treatment pathway used in a medical-surgical patient population decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) compared with the standard of care.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study, conducted in a large academic tertiary care hospital, involved 582 subjects who met criteria for study inclusion, with 275 subjects in the 2010 cohort and 307 in the 2012 cohort. The Alcohol Withdrawal Project Team was formed with the goal of creating a standardized approach to the recognition and treatment of alcohol withdrawal at Duke University Hospital. The group created a computerized physician order entry alcohol withdrawal treatment pathway with 4 possible treatment paths chosen on the basis of current withdrawal symptoms, vital signs, and alcohol withdrawal history. The 4 treatment paths are 1 prophylaxis; 2 mild-to-moderate withdrawal; 3 moderate-to-severe withdrawal, and 4 severe withdrawal/alcohol withdrawal delirium. Each treatment path corresponds to a different lorazepam dose and dose schedule and symptom assessment. This pathway was implemented in the hospital at the end of 2011.

RESULTS

Using a Cox proportional hazards model and adjusting for covariates, there was a 1 day [95% confidence interval (CI), 1-2 d] reduction in median hospital LOS between the 2010 and 2012 cohorts, 5 versus 4 days, respectively. The average ratio in hospital LOS between the 2 cohorts was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.25-1.67). The CI was estimated by bootstrapping and indicated a significantly longer LOS in the 2010 cohort compared with the 2012 cohort. Nonsignificant changes were found in the proportion of subjects admitted to the intensive care unit (24% in 2010 vs. 29.3% in 2012), LOS in the intensive care unit (7.1±8 d in 2010 vs. 5.6±6.9 d in 2012), and proportion of patients discharged with a diagnosis of delirium tremens (17.8% in 2010 vs. 15.3% in 2012).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the successful implementation of an alcohol withdrawal treatment pathway in a medical-surgical population hospitalized in a large tertiary care facility with significant impact on hospital LOS.

Guidelines for biological treatment of substance use and related disorders, part 1: Alcoholism, first revision

These practice guidelines for the biological treatment of alcohol use disorders are an update of the first edition, published in 2008, which was developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). For this 2016 revision, we performed a systematic review (MEDLINE/PUBMED database, Cochrane Library) of all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of alcoholism and extracted data from national guidelines. The Task Force evaluated the identified literature with respect to the strength of evidence for the efficacy of each medication and subsequently categorised it into six levels of evidence (A-F) and five levels of recommendation (1-5). Thus, the current guidelines provide a clinically and scientifically relevant, evidence-based update of our earlier recommendations. These guidelines are intended for use by clinicians and practitioners who evaluate and treat people with alcohol use disorders and are primarily concerned with the biological treatment of adults with such disorders.

Comparison of enteral ethanol and benzodiazepines for alcohol withdrawal in neurocritical care patients

We designed a study to evaluate the use of benzodiazepines and ethanol in patients being assessed for alcohol withdrawal and compare outcomes between the two agents. This is a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to neurocritical care or neurosurgical services who were at risk for ethanol withdrawal between June 2011 and September 2015. Patients were divided into two groups based on the first medication administered for alcohol withdrawal management, either benzodiazepine (n=50) or enteral ethanol (n=50). The primary endpoint was the maximum change in Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol scale (CIWA) score within the first 24hours. Secondary endpoints included maximum and minimum CIWA score in 5days, length of stay, and change in Glasgow Coma Scale. Study groups differed by mortality risk, level of coma at admission, and other clinical characteristics, with the ethanol group appearing less severely ill. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the maximum change in CIWA score at 24hours (-0.97, 95%CI: -3.21 to 1.27, p=0.39). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay was 6.5 days and 1 day shorter for the ethanol group (p=0.03 and p=0.02, respectively). In summary, enteral ethanol was preferentially used in patients who are more likely to be capable of tolerating oral intake. We found that the change from baseline in CIWA score or other physiologic variables was not substantially different between the two agents. The overall utility of benzodiazepines and enteral ethanol remains unclear for this population and further study is needed to determine superiority.

Investigation of allyphenyline efficacy in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal symptoms

We have recently demonstrated that allyphenyline, behaving as α2C-adrenoceptor/serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist and α2A-adrenoceptor antagonist, in mice enhanced morphine analgesia, attenuated morphine withdrawal symptoms, showed significant antidepressant-like activity and was devoid of sedative side effects. Opioid and alcohol withdrawal shares several common neurobiological and molecular mechanisms. Therefore, in this study we expanded our analysis of the pharmacological properties of allyphenyline by investigating its ability to prevent the expression of somatic withdrawal signs, anxiety-like behavior and hyperlocomotion associated with chronic ethanol intoxication. Rats were subjected to induction of ethanol dependence via repeated daily intragastric ethanol (20%) administration for 4 consecutive days. Twelve hours after the last alcohol administration, somatic alcohol withdrawal signs were scored. Results revealed a significant expression of physical withdrawal signs that were not affected by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of allyphenyline at the doses of 0.05, 0.275 and 0.5 mg/kg. In contrast, allyphenyline (0.05 and 0.275 mg/kg i.p.) significantly reduced hyperanxiety-like behavior observed 6 days after alcohol intoxication as measured using the defensive burying test. Allyphenyline also reduced open field hyperlocomotor activity associated with alcohol withdrawal. Notably, the anxiolytic effect of the compound, as well as the already reported antidepressant action, was observed at very low doses, suggesting the involvement of its α2C-adrenoceptor/serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonism. Therefore, the present investigation suggests that allyphenyline might represent an interesting pharmacological tool to investigate the potential of compounds exhibiting α2C-adrenoceptor/serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonism and α2A-adrenoceptor antagonism in the treatment of hyperanxiety and hyperlocomotion occurring during alcohol withdrawal in dependent subjects.

Is it prime time for alpha2-adrenocepter agonists in the treatment of withdrawal syndromes?

The need to treat withdrawal syndromes is a common occurrence in outpatient, inpatient ward, and intensive care unit (ICU) settings. A PubMed and Google Scholar search using alpha2-adrenoreceptor agonist (A2AA), specific A2AA agents, withdrawal syndrome and nicotine, and alcohol and opioid withdrawal terms was performed. A2AA agents appear to be able to modulate many of the signs and symptoms of significant withdrawal syndromes but are also capable of significant side effects, which can limit clinical use. Non-opioid oral A2AA agent use for opioid withdrawal has been well established. Pharmacologic combination therapy that utilizes A2AA agents for withdrawal syndromes appears promising but requires further formal testing to better define which other agents, under what condition(s), and at what A2AA doses are needed. The A2AA dexmedetomidine may be useful as an adjunctive agent in treating severe alcohol withdrawal syndromes in the ICU. In general, the current data does not support the routine use of A2AA as the primary or sole agent to treat ethanol/alcohol or nicotine withdrawal syndromes. Specific A2AA agents such as lofexidine has been shown to have a primary role in non-opioid-based treatment of opioid withdrawal syndrome and dexmedetomidine in combination with benzodiazepines has been shown to have potential in the treatment of severe ICU-based alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

Evaluation of Early Dexmedetomidine Addition to the Standard of Care for Severe Alcohol Withdrawal in the ICU: A Retrospective Controlled Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the impact of dexmedetomidine (DEX) administration on benzodiazepine (BZD) requirements in intensive care unit (ICU) patients experiencing alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS).

METHODS

This trial included adults admitted to the ICU for >24 hours for AWS. Early DEX was defined as receiving DEX within 60 hours of hospital admission. The primary outcome was 12-hour BZD requirement from the inflection point or DEX initiation. Secondary outcomes included 24-hour BZD requirements, symptom control, ICU and hospital length of stay, and incidence and duration of mechanical ventilation. Safety outcomes included incidence of bradycardia and hypotension.

RESULTS

Twenty patients receiving DEX were matched to 22 control patients. The mean 12-hour change in BZD requirement was significantly different for DEX versus control (-20 vs -8.3 mg, P = .0455) with a trend toward significance at 24 hours (-29.6 vs -11 mg, P = .06). No significant differences were noted in other secondary outcomes. Patients receiving DEX experienced significantly more bradycardia than controls (35% vs 0%, P < .01) but not hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests DEX is associated with a reduction in BZD requirement when utilized as adjunctive therapy for AWS. A larger prospective trial is needed to evaluate the clinical impact of DEX for AWS.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose range study of dexmedetomidine as adjunctive therapy for alcohol withdrawal

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate dexmedetomidine as adjunctive therapy to lorazepam for severe alcohol withdrawal.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Single center; medical ICU.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four adult patients with a Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment score greater than or equal to 15 despite greater than or equal to 16 mg of lorazepam over a 4-hour period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received a symptom-triggered Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment protocol with lorazepam and were randomized to dexmedetomidine 1.2 μg/kg/hr (high dose), 0.4 μg/kg/hr (low dose), or placebo as adjunctive therapy for up to 5 days or resolution of withdrawal symptoms.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

High-dose and low-dose groups were combined as a single dexmedetomidine group for primary analysis with secondary analysis exploring a dose-response relationship. The difference in 24-hour lorazepam requirements after versus before study drug was greater in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the placebo group (-56 mg vs -8 mg, p = 0.037). Median differences were similar for high dose and low dose. The 7-day cumulative lorazepam requirements were not statistically different between dexmedetomidine and placebo (159 mg vs 181 mg). Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment or Riker sedation-agitation scale scores representing severe agitation (13% vs 25%) or moderate agitation (27% vs 22%) within 24 hours of initiating study drug were similar for dexmedetomidine and placebo groups, respectively. Bradycardia occurred more frequently in the dexmedetomidine group versus placebo group (25% vs 0%, p = not significant), with the majority of bradycardia occurring in the high-dose group (37.5%). Study drug rate adjustments occurred more often in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the placebo group (50% vs 0%, p = 0.02). Neither endotracheal intubation nor seizure occurred in any group while on study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive dexmedetomidine for severe alcohol withdrawal maintains symptom control and reduces lorazepam exposure in the short term, but not long term, when using a symptom-triggered protocol. Monitoring for bradycardia is needed with dexmedetomidine but the occurrence may be lessened with low dose. Further study is needed to evaluate the clinical impact of dexmedetomidine.

Alcohol, nicotine, and iatrogenic withdrawals in the ICU

OBJECTIVES

The neurophysiology, risk factors, and screening tools associated with alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the ICU are reviewed. Alcohol withdrawal syndrome assessment and its treatment options are discussed. Description of nicotine withdrawal and related publications specific to the critically ill are also reviewed. A brief comment as to sedative and opiate withdrawal follows.

DATA AND SUMMARY

The role of currently published alcohol withdrawal syndrome pharmacologic strategies (benzodiazepines, ethanol, clomethiazole, antipsychotics, barbiturates, propofol, and dexmedetomidine) is detailed. Studies on nicotine withdrawal management in the ICU focus mainly on the safety (mortality) of nicotine replacement therapy. Study characteristics and methodological limitations are presented.

CONCLUSION

We recommend a pharmacologic regimen titrated to withdrawal symptoms in ICU patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Benzodiazepines are a reasonable option; phenobarbital appears to confer some advantages in combination with benzodiazepines. Propofol and dexmedetomidine have not been rigorously tested in comparative studies of drug withdrawal treatment; their use as additional or alternative strategies for managing withdrawal syndromes in ICU patients should therefore be individualized to each patient. Insufficient data preclude recommendations as to nicotine replacement therapy and management of iatrogenic drug withdrawal in ICU patients.