The validity and sensitivity of PANSS-6 in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Medication burden reduction and early clinical benefit through aripiprazole once monthly in schizophrenia patients with polypharmacy

Antipsychotic polypharmacy is commonly used in clinical settings, with a growing trend in using long-acting injections to mitigate many side effects of polypharmacy. A previous study demonstrated that long-acting aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) injection increased treatment adherence, restored functionality, and improved symptoms. However, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate the therapeutic effects of AOM in polypharmacy practice. This observational study aimed to investigate the real-world clinical benefits and effectiveness of AOM by assessing changes in drug dosage, the number of drugs, clinical functioning, psychotic symptoms, and the duration of drug efficacy. Study participants were recruited from eight study sites, with the baseline visit marking the initiation of drug treatment. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records at screening, baseline, and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Over 12 months, we analyzed changes in drug dosage, the number of drugs, and scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-6 (PANSS-6), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGIS). Data from 139 participants were analyzed. Total 12-month antipsychotic doses calculated in chlorpromazine equivalents (CPE) were reduced by 32.6%. A comparison of total monthly antipsychotic doses in CPE between the first and last months showed a 24.6% reduction in the dose. Additionally, the quantity of benzodiazepine tablets/capsules, total benzodiazepine doses calculated in lorazepam equivalents, and quantity of tablets/capsules of mood stabilizers, anticholinergics, and beta blockers were significantly reduced. GAF scores increased by 14.1% over 12 months, and PANSS-6 total scores reduced by 17.3% over 12 months, with significant differences observed from month 1 and baseline, respectively. The scores steadily improved until month 9 compared to those of the previous months, continuing to improve through month 12. The CGI-S score reduced by 14.3% over 12 months, showing a significant decrease from month 1 and a steady improvement until month 6, maintaining this improvement until month 12. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the early effectiveness of AOM in treating Korean patients with schizophrenia on polypharmacy. AOM improved function and clinical symptoms in patients with schizophrenia from treatment onset and caused a decrease in the quantity and dosage of drugs taken by the patients.

Adjunctive methylphenidate extended release in patients with schizophrenia: Protocol of a single-centre fixed dose cross-over open-label trial to improve functional and cognitive outcomes

Background

Cognitive symptoms, among the core symptoms of schizophrenia, are associated with poor functional outcome and burden of illness. To date, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for these symptom clusters. Augmentation with psychostimulants has been proposed as a potential treatment option.

Objectives

The present study aims to assess off-label use of adjunctive methylphenidate extended release (ER) in patients with schizophrenia who are stable on antipsychotic medications, and to assess its efficacy on functioning and cognitive outcome.

Methods

This is a single centre study at the Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre. An open-label fixed dose controlled cross-over trial is planned. Eligible participants will be randomized into one of two arms of the study: 1) four weeks of add-on methylphenidate ER 36 mg, or 2) four weeks of treatment as usual. At 4 weeks, participants will switch arms. The duration of the study includes 8 weeks of treatment and a follow-up visit at 12 weeks. Primary outcome measures include tablet-based tests of functioning and cognition (VRFCAT and BAC) and will be administered at baseline and every 4 weeks. We are aiming to recruit a total of 24 participants.

Expected outcomes

The proposed project intends to assess a potential treatment option for cognitive deficits of schizophrenia, for which there are no recommendations by current treatment guidelines. The novelty and significance of the current study is that it investigates this intervention and assess applicability of it in a "real world setting" in a tertiary care hospital.

The Transdiagnostic Global Impression - Psychopathology scale (TGI-P): Initial development of a novel transdiagnostic tool for assessing, tracking, and visualising psychiatric symptom severity in everyday practice

Lacking biomarkers in psychiatry calls for a valid and reliable assessment of psychopathology across mental disorders that is easy to use, bridges research and clinical care, and that can capture clinician and patient perspectives. Herein we propose, a novel, brief, transdiagnostic tool to assess and visualize symptom severity in different psychiatric disorders. The Transdiagnostic Global Impression - Psychopathology scale (TGI-P) is based on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S), which was originally designed to measure global illness severity in one score. The TGI-P covers 10 transdiagnostic symptom domains and similar to the CGI-S, it is rated on a 7-point Likert-scale from 1 (normal) to 7 (extreme). These ten domains include positive symptoms, negative symptoms, manic symptoms, depressive symptoms, addiction symptoms, cognitive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, sleep symptoms, hostility symptoms, and self-harm symptoms. The results are visually presented, thus simplifying the monitoring of symptoms, and facilitating discussion with patients and caregivers. As part of the development process, the TGI-P was surveyed among 36 psychiatrists from 3 countries. Importantly, over 80 % of them was "very positive" or "positive" about the concept of the tool, and most of them (70 %) reported willingness to use it in their everyday practice. Further psychometric development and testing of the TGI-P is underway alongside future TGI scales covering adverse events, functioning and satisfaction.

Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia

There is no established treatment for patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS). Clozapine augmentation strategies with antipsychotics or others substances are effective in comparison with placebo while and Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) showed to be effective in comparison with treatment as usual (TAU) but not with placebo (sham-ECT). In the present double- blind randomized controlled trial, we compared 40 outpatients who received 20 sessions of ECT (n = 21) or sham-ECT (n = 19) (age = 37.40 ± 9.62, males = 77.5 %, illness duration = 14.95 ± 8.32 years, mean total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) = 101.10 ± 24.91) who fulfilled well-defined CRS criteria including baseline clozapine plasma levels ≥350 ng/mL. The primary outcome was the ≥50 % PANSS Total Score reduction; secondary outcomes were the scores of the PANSS subscales, PANSS five-factor dimensions, PANSS-6 and the Calgary Depression Rating Scale (CDRS). Treatment response was analyzed by percentage reduction, Linear Mixed Models and effect sizes. At baseline both groups showed no differences except for years of school education (included as a covariate). At endpoint, only 1/19 of the completers (5.26 %) in the ECT group and 0/17 in the sham-ECT group showed a ≥50 % total PANSS score reduction. Both groups showed no significant differences of the total PANSS score (F = 0.12; p = 0.73), Positive (F = 0.27, p = 0.61), Negative (F = 0.25, p = 0.62), and General Psychopathology scores (F = 0.01, p = 0.94) as well for all PANSS five factors, the PANSS-6 and CDRS. Thus, the present study found no evidence that ECT is better than Sham-ECT in patients with CRS. Future sham-ECT controlled studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to test the efficacy of ECT for patients with CRS.

Variations to plasma H2O2 levels and TAC in chronical medicated and treatment-resistant male schizophrenia patients: Correlations with psychopathology

Accumulating evidence suggests that imbalanced oxidative stress (OS) may contribute to the mechanism of schizophrenia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the associations of OS parameters with psychopathological symptoms in male chronically medicated schizophrenia (CMS) and treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) patients. Levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (·OH), peroxidase (POD), α-tocopherol (α-toc), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) were assayed in males with CMS and TRS, and matched healthy controls. Schizophrenia symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The results demonstrated significant differences in the variables H2O2 (F = 5.068, p = 0.008), ·OH (F = 31.856, p < 0.001), POD (F = 14.043, p < 0.001), α-toc (F = 3.711, p = 0.027), TAC (F = 24.098, p < 0.001), and MMP-9 (F = 3.219, p = 0.043) between TRS and CMS patients and healthy controls. For TRS patients, H2O2 levels were correlated to the PANSS positive subscale (r = 0.386, p = 0.032) and smoking (r = -0,412, p = 0.021), while TAC was significantly negatively correlated to the PANSS total score (r = -0.578, p = 0.001) and POD and TAC levels were positively correlated to body mass index (r = 0.412 and 0.357, p = 0.021 and 0.049, respectively). For patients with CMS, ·OH levels and TAC were positively correlated to the PANSS general subscale (r = 0.308, p = 0.031) and negatively correlated to the PANSS total score (r = -0.543, p < 0.001). Furthermore, H2O2, α-toc, and ·OH may be protective factors against TRS, and POD was a risk factor. Patients with CMS and TRS exhibit an imbalance in OS, thus warranting future investigations.

Alterations of serum neuropeptide levels and their relationship to cognitive impairment and psychopathology in male patients with chronic schizophrenia

Serum neuropeptide levels may be linked to schizophrenia (SCZ) pathogenesis. This study aims to examine the relation between five serum neuropeptide levels and the cognition of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), chronic stable schizophrenia (CSS), and in healthy controls (HC). Three groups were assessed: 29 TRS and 48 CSS patients who were hospitalized in regional psychiatric hospitals, and 53 HC. After the above participants were enrolled, we examined the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and the blood serum levels of α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), β-endorphin (BE), neurotensin (NT), oxytocin (OT) and substance.P (S.P). Psychiatric symptoms in patients with SCZ were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. SCZ patients performed worse than HC in total score and all subscales of the RBANS. The levels of the above five serum neuropeptides were significantly higher in SCZ than in HC. The levels of OT and S.P were significantly higher in CSS than in TRS patients. The α-MSH levels in TRS patients were significantly and negatively correlated with the language scores of RBANS. However, the BE and NT levels in CSS patients were significantly and positively correlated with the visuospatial/constructional scores of RBANS. Moreover, the interaction effect of NT and BE levels was positively associated with the visuospatial/constructional scores of RBANS. Therefore, abnormally increased serum neuropeptide levels may be associated with the physiology of SCZ, and may cause cognitive impairment and psychiatric symptoms, especially in patients with TRS.

Are informants required to obtain valid ratings on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)?

Ratings on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) are ideally based on both a patient interview and an informant questionnaire. In research and clinical settings, however, the informant questionnaire is often omitted. This study investigated the consequences of omitting informant information by comparing PANSS ratings of patients with schizophrenia (n = 49 patients, 77 ratings) conducted with and without informant information, respectively. Additionally, changes in symptom severity over time based on ratings with and without informant information were also compared for the full PANSS and the six-item version of the PANSS (PANSS-6). PANSS ratings including informant information were higher than those without, both at the total score and individual item level. Additionally, the full PANSS appeared less "responsive" to baseline-to-endpoint changes for ratings without informant information compared to ratings including informant information, while no differences were found for the PANSS-6.

Initial severity of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-30, its main subscales plus the PANSS-6, and the relationship to subsequent improvement and trial dropout: a pooled participant-level analysis of 18 placebo-controlled risperidone and paliperidone trials

Greater initial severity on the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) correlates positively with antipsychotic-placebo separation and trial dropout, but it is unknown whether these associations are present also on PANSS-derived subscales. We assessed the relationship between initial severity and antipsychotic-placebo separation as measured by PANSS-30 and four PANSS symptom subscales: the positive (PANSS-POS), negative (PANSS-NEG), general (PANSS-GEN) and 6-item (PANSS-6) subscales, using patient-level data from 18 placebo-controlled risperidone and paliperidone trials. Analysis of covariance in the intention-to-treat population (last-observation-carried-forward) was used to assess antipsychotic-placebo separation and trial dropout. Across 6685 participants (90% schizophrenia, 10% schizoaffective disorder), the initial severity-by-treatment interaction was statistically significant for PANSS-30 (beta: -0.155; p < 0.001) and all PANSS subscales (beta range: -0.097 to -0.135; p-value range: < 0.001 to 0.002). In all cases, antipsychotic-placebo differences increased with initial severity. Judging by the distribution of relative outcomes (percent remaining symptoms), the interaction was partly explained by an increased chance of responding, but also by larger numerical responses in those who did respond, as initial severity increased. Except for PANSS-NEG, high initial severity on all PANSS scales predicted increased trial dropout, although not statistically significantly so for PANSS-6. In summary, we thus replicate previous findings showing greater initial severity to predict larger antipsychotic-placebo separation and extend these results to four PANSS subscales. For PANSS-POS and PANSS-GEN, but not for PANSS-NEG and PANSS-6, we also replicate the association between initial severity and trial dropout. Patients with low initial negative symptom severity were identified as a group of particular interest for further study since their results diverged most from the average both with regard to antipsychotic-placebo separation (low separation measured by PANSS-NEG) and trial dropout (high level).

Catalase and interleukin-6 serum elevation in a prediction of treatment-resistance in male schizophrenia patients

BACKGROUND

Oxidative stress (OS) and neuroinflammatory pathways play an important role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. The present study investigated the relationship between OS, inflammatory cytokines, and clinical features in male patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS).

METHOD

We measured plasma OS parameters, including manganese-superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD), copper/zinc-containing SOD (CuZn-SOD), total-SOD (T-SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px); and serum inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)- 1α, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon (IFN)-γ, from 80 male patients with chronic schizophrenia (31 had TRS and 49 had chronic stable schizophrenia (CSS)), and 42 healthy controls. The severity of psychotic symptoms was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

RESULTS

Compared with healthy controls, plasma Mn-SOD, CuZn-SOD, T-SOD, GSH-Px, and MDA levels were significantly lower, while CAT and serum IL-6 levels were higher in both TRS and CSS male patients (all P < 0.05). Significant differences in the activities of CAT (F = 6.068, P = 0.016) and IL-6 levels (F = 6.876, P = 0.011) were observed between TRS and CSS male patients after analysis of covariance. Moreover, a significant positive correlation was found between IL-6 levels and PANSS general psychopathology subscores (r = 0.485, P = 0.006) and between CAT activity and PANSS total scores (r = 0.409, P = 0.022) in TRS male patients. CAT and IL-6 levels were predictors for TRS. Additionally, in chronic schizophrenia patients, a significant positive correlation was observed between IL-6 and GSH-Px (r = 0.292, P = 0.012), and the interaction effect of IL-6 and GSH-Px was positively associated with PANSS general psychopathology scores (r = 0.287, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study indicated that variations in OS and inflammatory cytokines may be involved in psychopathology for patients with chronic schizophrenia, especially in male patients with TRS.

Validation of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale obtained via the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview among outpatients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

The six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) is a measure of the severity of core symptoms of schizophrenia, which can be administered via the brief Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI). A recent study has confirmed the validity of PANSS-6 ratings as derived by SNAPSI (PANSS-6_SNAPSI) among inpatients with schizophrenia.

AIMS

We aimed to test the validity of PANSS-6_SNAPSI among outpatients with schizophrenia using PANSS-6 ratings extracted from the 30-item PANSS-30 as derived by the Structured Clinical Interview for the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6_SCI-PANSS) as a gold standard reference.

METHODS

PANSS-6_SNAPSI and PANSS-6_SCI-PANSS ratings were obtained at two time points by independent raters with established inter-rater reliability. Agreement between PANSS-6_SNAPSI and PANSS-6_SCI-PANSS ratings was estimated via intra-class coefficients (ICCs) and responsiveness over time was quantified using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Post hoc "leave-one-out" analyses were carried out, in which each rater in turn was excluded from the ICC calculations.

RESULTS

Seventy-three outpatients with schizophrenia participated in the study (mean age: 38.3 years; 56% males). The ICC for PANSS-6_SNAPSI versus PANSS-6_SCI-PANSS was 0.67 [95%CI = 0.56-0.76] and the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for responsiveness was 0.40 (p = 0.004). When data from a specific outlying rater were excluded, the ICC for PANSS-6_SNAPSI versus PANSS-6_SCI-PANSS was 0.75 [95% CI = 0.63-0.83] and the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for responsiveness was 0.55 (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

We found PANSS-6_SNAPSI ratings to have acceptable clinical validity, suggesting that PANSS-6_SNAPSI can be used for both inpatients and outpatients with schizophrenia.

A Guideline and Checklist for Initiating and Managing Clozapine Treatment in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) will affect about one in three patients with schizophrenia. Clozapine is the only treatment approved for TRS, and patients should be treated as soon as possible to improve their chances of achieving remission. Despite its effectiveness, concern over side effects, monitoring requirements, and inexperience with prescribing often result in long delays that can expose patients to unnecessary risks and compromise their chances of achieving favorable long-term outcomes. We critically reviewed the literature on clozapine use in TRS, focusing on guidelines, systematic reviews, and algorithms to identify strategies for improving clozapine safety and tolerability. Based on this, we have provided an overview of strategies to support early initiation of clozapine in patients with TRS based on the latest evidence and our clinical experience, and have summarized the key elements in a practical, evidence-based checklist for identifying and managing patients with TRS, with the aim of increasing confidence in prescribing and monitoring clozapine therapy.

Scalability of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in first-episode schizophrenia assessed by Rasch models

OBJECTIVE

Historically, assessment of the psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) has had several foci: (1) calculation of reliability indexes, (2) extraction of subdimensions from the scale, and (3) assessment of the validity of the total score. In this study, we aimed to examine the scalability and to assess the clinical performance of the 30-item PANSS total score as well as the scalability of a shorter version (PANSS-6) of the scale.

METHODS

A composite data set of 1073 patients with first-episode schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorder was subjected to Rasch analysis of PANSS data from baseline and 4-6 weeks follow-up.

RESULTS

The central tests of fit of the Rasch model failed to satisfy the statistical requirements behind item homogeneity for the PANSS-30 as well as the PANSS-6 total score. For the PANSS-30, Differential Item Functioning was pronounced both for the 7-point Likert scale rating categories and when dichotomizing the rating categories. Subsequently, the Rasch structure analysis in the context of dichotomized items was used to isolate and estimate a systematic error because of item inhomogeneity, as well as a random error. The size of the combined sources of error for the PANSS-30 total score approximated 20% which is often regarded as clinical cut-off between response versus no-response.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate the operational consequences of a lack of statistical fit of the Rasch model and suggest that the calculated measure of uncertainty needs to be considered when using the PANSS-30 total score.

Clinical validation of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale obtained via the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview

BACKGROUND

The six-item version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) has shown promise as a brief measure of the severity of core symptoms of schizophrenia. However, since all prior analyses of the PANSS-6 were based on data extracted from studies using the full 30-item PANSS (PANSS-30), it remains unknown whether it is possible to obtain valid information for the PANSS-6 ratings via a brief interview, such as the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI).

AIMS

We aimed to validate the PANSS-6 ratings obtained via the SNAPSI using the PANSS-6 scores extracted from the PANSS-30 ratings obtained via the comprehensive Structured Clinical Interview for PANSS (SCI-PANSS) as the gold-standard reference.

METHODS

The PANSS-6 ratings based on the SNAPSI and the PANSS-30 ratings based on the SCI-PANSS were conducted by independent raters with established inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven inpatients with schizophrenia (M_age = 35.1 ± 11.7 years; males = 57%; paranoid schizophrenia = 75%) participated in the study. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the PANSS-6 total scores obtained using the SNAPSI and the PANSS-30-derived PANSS-6 total scores via the SCI-PANSS was 0.77 (p < 0.001). The ICC for the PANSS-6 total score and the PANSS-30-derived PANSS-8 (Andreasen's remission criteria) was 0.75 (p < 0.001). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for changes in PANSS-6 total scores via the SNAPSI and changes in PANSS-30-derived PANSS-6 total scores was 0.70 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the SNAPSI to rate the PANSS-6 enables a focused and brief assessment of the severity of core symptoms of schizophrenia, which facilitates measurement-based care and clinical decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis

In order for measurement-based care to be implemented, there is a need for brief rating instruments that can be administered in a short amount of time, but that are still sufficiently informative. Here, we assessed the drug-placebo sensitivity of the six-item subscale (PANSS-6) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) using a large collection of patient-level data (n = 6685) from randomized controlled trials of risperidone and paliperidone. When analyzing the data by study, we found no material difference in mean effect sizes (ES) between the two measures (PANSS-30 ES = 0.45, PANSS-6 ES = 0.44; p = 0.642). Stratifying the pooled population according to several putative effect moderators (e.g., age, formulation, dose, or diagnosis) generally yielded no meaningful ES differences between the two measures. Similarly, early improvement (≥20% improvement at week 1) on the PANSS-6 predicted subsequent response (≥40% improvement at endpoint) as well as the analog prediction using PANSS-30. Finally, cross-sectional symptom remission assessed via the PANSS-6 showed very good agreement (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 98%) with cross-sectional symptom remission defined by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group.

Clinical validation of the Symptom Self-rating Scale for Schizophrenia (4S) among inpatients

PURPOSE

Self-reports of psychosis-related symptoms may be a valuable supplement to clinician-ratings, but more validation studies are required. The aim of this study was to conduct clinical validation for the Symptom Self-rating Scale for Schizophrenia (4S) in an inpatient setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia were invited to participate in the study. The participants completed the 4S, the 5-item World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (WHO-5) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at two time points. Trained raters assessed participants using the 6-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6). The relationship between the 4S and PANSS-6, self-reported side effects, functioning and wellbeing was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho).

RESULTS

Sixty-one participants completed the 4S at least once (yielding a total of 91 completed 4S questionnaires). The 4S total score was weakly correlated with the PANSS-6 total score (rho = 0.37, p < 0.001). The rho's for individual 4S and PANSS-6 subscales and item comparisons ranged from -0.24 (thought disorder) to 0.69 (hallucinations). Finally, the 4S hallucination subscale was also sensitive to change. The 4S was strongly inversely correlated with wellbeing (WHO-5) and moderately inversely correlated with functioning (SDS total score).

CONCLUSION

The 4S holds promise as a valid self-report of core schizophrenia symptoms among inpatients. While the hallucination subscale seems superior to existing scales, the thought disorder subscale needs to be re-developed.

Standardized training in the rating of the six-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6)

The six-item Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) allows for a brief assessment of the severity of core symptoms of schizophrenia. However, implementing the PANSS-6 in clinical practice requires that staff members' ratings are accurate and reliable. We aimed to investigate whether such accuracy and reliability can be obtained via a brief video-based training program. One-hundred-and-four staff members from a psychiatric hospital in Denmark participated in the training. Participants performed a baseline PANSS-6 rating based on a video of a patient being interviewed using the Simplified positive And Negative Symptoms interview (SNAPSI). Subsequently, a theoretical introduction video was displayed followed by five successive videotaped SNAPSI patient interviews. After each SNAPSI video, individual ratings were conducted before a video providing the gold standard rating was displayed. The accuracy of ratings was estimated by calculating the proportion of participants not deviating from the gold standard rating with >2 points on individual items or >6 points on the PANSS-6 total score. Reliability was tested after each step in the training by means of Gwet's Agreement Coefficient (Gwet). By the end of the training, 72% of the participants rated within the acceptable deviations of the gold standard, ranging from 60% (nurses) to 91% (medical doctors & psychologists). The reliability improved (Gwet baseline vs. endpoint) for all PANSS-6 items, except for Blunted affect. In conclusion, the majority of the staff members conducted accurate PANSS-6 ratings after a brief standardized training program, supporting the implementation of PANSS-6 in clinical settings to facilitate measurement-based care.

Measurement based care in schizophrenia-Feasibility in routine clinical practice

Measurement based care (MBC) implies the utilization of structured objective scales/batteries in the assessment and monitoring of an illness. Patients with schizophrenia with heterogeneous presentation would potentially benefit better through MBC. Time constraints and additional work burden are frequently cited as barriers in implementing objective assessments. In this selective review, the authors discuss the available standard scales for assessment in schizophrenia, the advantages and disadvantages in implementing MBC and a feasible approach to overcome the barriers by adapting shorter versions of structured scales.

Transdermal Asenapine in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Asenapine is a novel antipsychotic that has demonstrated efficacy in controlling psychosis in schizophrenia and mania in bipolar illness. It must be administered as a sublingual formulation because it is nearly completely metabolized in the first pass through the liver. Recently, a transdermal formulation of asenapine has been approved for schizophrenia by the Food and Drug Administration.

METHODS

A systematic review of transdermal asenapine was done utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) model.

DISCUSSION

There are several formulations of transdermal asenapine but only Secuado^® has been approved for clinical use. Total bioavailability is 35%. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) is 4 ng/mL and occurs within 1 hr (Tmax); elimination half-life (t_1/2) is 24 hrs (range 13.4 to 39.2 h). Asenapine is highly bound (95%) to albumin and α₁-acid glycoprotein. It has a unique receptor profile in which it functions as an antagonist at multiple receptors with affinity that is higher than D₂ (K_i = 1.3) including D₃, D₄, 5HT_2A, 5HT_2C, 5HT_2B, 5HT₇, 5HT₆, H₁, and α2. This profile suggests that asenapine may be of particular value off label for bipolar depression, anxiety, and aggression. Transdermal asenapine was only tested in one randomized, placebo-controlled study of acute psychosis in schizophrenia. It was superior to placebo at week 6 with nearly one-third of patients experiencing >30% improvement in total PANSS score which translates in a number needed to treat (NNT) of 9.

Can the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (PANSS) differentiate treatment-resistant from non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia? A factor analytic investigation based on data from the Pattern cohort study

Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (TRS) and Non-Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia (NTRS) may represent different subtypes of schizophrenia. However, few studies have investigated their PANSS symptom dimensions by Exploratory (EFA) or Confirmatory (CFA). Data from the present study are derived from 1429 patients of the Pattern study. TRS was defined by the use of clozapine in the previous year whereas NTRS by the use of non-clozapine antipsychotics ("by proxy"). Factors were chosen based on the Kaiser criterion and considered valid when loadings were greater than or equal to 0.5. The fit to the data was evaluated by CFA in comparison with well-established PANSS models, using fit indexes. The EFA yielded similar five-factor model in both groups: Negative, Positive, Anxiety/Depression, Cognitive and Excited. CFA showed a satisfactory, but not perfect, fit to the data, as compared with the previous PANSS factor analytic models. Despite the limitations regarding the 'by proxy' definition of TRS, the results of the present study show that there are no differences in the factorial structure of PANSS in patients with TRS and NTRS.