1
|
Efkemann SA, Lickiewicz J, Doedens P, Lantta T, Bali P, Husum TL. A Scoping Review on Staff Attitudes towards the Use of Coercion in Mental Healthcare. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1552. [PMID: 39201112 PMCID: PMC11354183 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Attitudes of mental health professionals towards the use of coercion are highly relevant concerning its use coercion in mental healthcare, as mental health professionals have to weigh ethical arguments and decide within a legal frame in which situations to use coercion or not. Therefore, assessment of those attitudes is relevant for research in this field. A vital instrument to measure those attitudes towards the use of coercion is the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. This scoping review aims to provide a structured overview of the advantages and limitations in the assessment of attitudes toward coercion. We conducted a scoping review in Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science, based on the PRISMA-ScR. Inclusion criteria were empirical studies on the attitudes of mental health professionals. We included 80 studies and systematically mapped data about the main results and limitations in assessing attitudes toward coercion. The main results highlighted the relevance and increased interest in staff attitudes towards coercion in mental healthcare. Still, the majority of the included studies relied on a variety of different concepts and definitions concerning attitudes. The data further indicated difficulties in developing new and adapting existing assessment instruments because of the equivocal definitions of underlying concepts. To improve the research and knowledge in this area, future studies should be based on solid theoretical foundations. We identified the need for methodological changes and standardized procedures that take into account existing evidence from attitude research in social psychology, nursing science, and other relevant research fields. This would include an update of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale based on the limitations identified in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Agnes Efkemann
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, 44791 Bochum, Germany
| | - Jakub Lickiewicz
- Department of Health Psychology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Krakow, Poland
| | - Paul Doedens
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Urban Vitality—Centre of Expertise, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, 1105 BD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tella Lantta
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland;
- Centre for Forensic Behavioural Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Australia
| | - Panagiota Bali
- Second Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University General Hospital “Attikon”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Chaidari, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Birkeland S, Bogh SB, Pedersen ML, Kerring JH, Morsø L, Tingleff EB, Gildberg FA. Variation in opinions on coercion use among mental healthcare professionals: a questionnaire study. Nord J Psychiatry 2024; 78:448-455. [PMID: 38626028 DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2341928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Even if coercive measures are widely applied in psychiatry and have numerous well-known drawbacks, there is limited known on the agreement among mental healthcare professionals' opinions on their use. In a questionnaire study using standardized scenarios, we investigated variation in staff opinions on coercion. METHODS In a web-based survey distributed to staff at three psychiatry hospitals, respondents were asked to consider if and what coercion to use by introducing two hypothetical scenarios involving involuntary psychiatric admission and in-hospital coercion. RESULTS One hundred thirty-two out of 601 invited staff members responded to the survey (Response Rate = 22%). There was large variation in participating staff members' opinions on how to best manage critical situations and what coercive measures were warranted. In the first scenario, 57% of respondents (n = 76) believed that the patient should be involuntarily admitted to hospital while the remaining respondents believed that the situation should be managed otherwise. Regarding the second scenario, 62% of respondents responded that some in-hospital coercion should be used. The majority of respondents believed that colleagues would behave similarly (60%) or with a tendency towards more coercion use (34%). Male gender, being nursing staff and having less coercion experience predicted being less inclined to choose involuntary hospital admission. CONCLUSION There is a high degree of variation in coercion use. This study suggests that this variation persists despite staff members being confronted with the same standardized situations. There is a need for evidence-based further guidance to minimize coercion in critical mental healthcare situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Søren Birkeland
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Søren Bie Bogh
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Martin Locht Pedersen
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Jonas Harder Kerring
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Lars Morsø
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Ellen Boldrup Tingleff
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Frederik Alkier Gildberg
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wullschleger A, Chatton A, Kuenzi N, Baeriswyl R, Kaiser S, Bartolomei J. Experience of violence and attitudes of staff members towards coercion in psychiatric settings: observational study. BJPsych Open 2024; 10:e80. [PMID: 38616714 PMCID: PMC11060063 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among important dimensions related to the use of coercive measures, professionals' attitude towards coercion is of particular interest. Little is known about how experiences of violence in the workplace might influence these attitudes. AIMS The present study aimed to investigate potential correlates of attitudes towards coercion, especially experiences of violence in the workplace. METHOD Mental health professionals were contacted through an online survey to assess their attitudes towards coercion using the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS). The three subscales of the SACS (critical, pragmatic and positive attitudes) were analysed in a multivariate multiple linear regression, using a set of covariates including experiences of violence in the workplace. We hypothesised that experience of violence in the workplace would correlate with less critical attitudes of staff members towards coercion. RESULTS A total of 423 professionals were included in the regression analysis. Age, professional category, feeling of insecurity, having witnessed or used coercion, and the emotional burden associated with coercive measures had a joint significant effect on the three SACS subscales. A feeling of insecurity, but not the experience of violence, was associated with a less critical, more positive appraisal of coercive measures. The emotional burden related to the use of coercion was associated with a more critical attitude. CONCLUSIONS The present results highlight the importance of considering staff members' training and well-being regarding their feelings of insecurity when addressing attitudes towards coercion. The experience of patients should be integrated into staff training and coercion reduction programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Chatton
- Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Noémie Kuenzi
- Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rachel Baeriswyl
- Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Kaiser
- Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Javier Bartolomei
- Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Antonsson H, Dahliavy L, Mouline H, Molin J. Struggling with unnecessary suffering-Registered nurses' experiences of delayed decisions on treatment without consent in forensic psychiatric inpatient care. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32:1681-1690. [PMID: 37458217 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Chemical restraints are used in forensic psychiatric inpatient care, however with caution as it can feel like an assault against patients' integrity. When waiting for decisions on treatment without consent, nursing staff are expected to care for patients with severe mental ill-health without the use of medical treatment, often with a feeling of already having tried all other available means. Knowledge about how registered nurses experience such situations is sparse but could contribute to the development of both teamwork and nursing approaches that could mean reduced suffering for patients. The aim of this study was to describe registered nurses' experiences of delayed decisions on treatment without consent in forensic psychiatric inpatient care. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted with registered nurses working in forensic psychiatric units in Sweden. Data were analysed through qualitative content analysis. The result showed that experiences of treatment without consent were about striving to protect patients from harm, striving for collaboration during difficult circumstances and striving to do good. This was interpreted as a struggle with unnecessary suffering. For registered nurses to be able to handle such challenging situations and relieve suffering for patients, experience and master-level education in mental health nursing are highlighted. Another aspect that is highlighted is the importance of having consultants familiar with the circumstances at the unit. A method for joint reflection is suggested, to promote an open-minded work culture with a well-functioning decision-making process and ensure that both consultants and nursing staff have support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liv Dahliavy
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Jenny Molin
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Psychiatry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Langenbach BP, Thieme A, van der Veen R, Reinehr S, Neuendorff NR. Attitudes towards sex workers: a nationwide cross-sectional survey among German healthcare providers. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1228316. [PMID: 37744482 PMCID: PMC10513093 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1228316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Worldwide, sex workers face stigmatization and discrimination, also within healthcare. Only few studies on healthcare providers' attitudes towards care of sex workers have been performed. This study assessed attitudes and knowledge of healthcare providers in Germany towards sex workers and their specific health risks. Methods German healthcare professionals and medical students were invited to participate in a nationwide cross-sectional study in 2022. The online survey used a German translation of the "Attitudes towards Prostitutes and Prostitution Scale" by Levin and Peled for assessment of attitudes towards sex work and workers, together with prevalence estimates of common mental and physical disorders. Results A total of 469 questionnaires were included into analysis. Older participants tended to regard sex work as less of a choice (p < 0.004) and sex workers as more victimized (p < 0.001). The frequency of professional contact to sex workers neither affected the perception of sex workers' status as victims vs. independent individuals, nor the perceived moral status. Moreover, healthcare professionals overestimated the prevalence of various disorders which was influenced by participants' attitudes towards sex workers. Discussion A comparison to a recent Allensbach survey demonstrated similar attitudes of healthcare providers and the general population towards sex workers. Our results suggest that German healthcare professionals are not free of prejudices against sex workers, as has been shown for other marginalized groups in society. Instead, they seem to be influenced by personal opinion rather than by objective facts which they should have acquired during their professional education. Future interventions (e.g., better training regarding marginal societal groups) are necessary to encounter these issues in order to improve healthcare for sex workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt P. Langenbach
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LVR University Hospital Essen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Thieme
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LVR University Hospital Essen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Raquel van der Veen
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sabrina Reinehr
- Experimental Eye Research Institute, University Eye Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nina R. Neuendorff
- Department of Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Välimäki M, Lam J, Bressington D, Cheung T, Wong WK, Cheng PYI, Ng CF, Ng T, Yam CP, Ip G, Paul L, Lantta T. Nurses', patients', and informal caregivers' attitudes toward aggression in psychiatric hospitals: A comparative survey study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274536. [PMID: 36174064 PMCID: PMC9522285 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Attitudes toward aggression is a controversial phenomenon in psychiatry. This study examined and compared attitudes toward patient aggression in psychiatric hospitals from the perspectives of nurses, patients and informal caregivers and identified factors associated to these attitudes. A total of 2,424 participants completed a self-reported instrument regarding attitudes toward aggression (12-items Perception of Aggression Scale; POAS-S). We analysed data from nurses (n = 782), patients (n = 886), and informal caregivers (n = 765). Pearson's r correlations were used to examine associations between variables. Differences between group scores were analysed using ANOVA/MANOVA with post-hoc Sheffe tests. Multivariate logistic regression models and logistic regression analysis were used to examine the effects of respondents' characteristics on their attitudes toward aggression. Nurses had significantly more negative and less tolerant perceptions toward aggression (mean [SD] 47.1 [7.5], p<0.001) than the patients (mean [SD] 44.4 [8.2]) and the informal caregivers (mean [SD] 45.0 [6.9), according to the POAS-S total scores. The same trend was found with the dysfunction and function sub-scores (mean [SD] 25.3 [4.1] and 15.0 [3.6], respectively); the differences between the groups were statistically significant (p <0.001) when nurses' scores were compared to those of both the patients (mean [SD] 23.7 [5.3] and 14.0 [4.1], respectively) and the informal caregivers (mean [SD] 24.4 [4.2] and 13.9 [3.5], respectively). The study offers new understanding of aggressive behavior in different treatment settings where attitudes toward patient behavior raises ethical and practical dilemmas. These results indicate a need for more targeted on-the-job training for nursing staff, aggression management rehabilitation programs for patients, and peer-support programs for informal caregivers focused on patient aggression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maritta Välimäki
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Joyce Lam
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Daniel Bressington
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Teris Cheung
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Wai Kit Wong
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Po Yee Ivy Cheng
- Community Psychiatric Services, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Chi Fai Ng
- Department of Psychiatry, Tai Po Hospital, Tai Po, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Tony Ng
- Department of Psychiatry, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Chun Pong Yam
- Department of Psychiatry, Kowloon Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Glendy Ip
- Central Nursing Division, Kwai Chung Hospital, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong (SAR), China
- Hong Kong College of Mental Health Nursing, The Hong Kong Academy of Nursing, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | - Lee Paul
- School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (SAR), China
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fukasawa M, Miyake M, Kikkawa T, Sueyasu T. Development of the Japanese version of Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:1026676. [PMID: 36325534 PMCID: PMC9618617 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1026676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An important factor in proceeding the efforts to reduce coercion in psychiatry is the attitudes of clinical staff toward its use. We aimed to develop the Japanese version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) and clarify its psychometric properties. METHODS After the translation and back-translation of the SACS, which includes 15 items consisting of three subscales, we conducted an anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey of clinical staffs working in 17 wards in two psychiatric hospitals. We administered the second survey to some of the participants to confirm the test-retest reliability. Additionally, we obtained information regarding the 17 wards from the institutions. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Structural validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). For construct validity, the correlation of the SACS score within wards and its association with the actual use of seclusion/restraints were explored using multilevel multivariate linear regression analyses. RESULTS We used 261 (67.1%) responses, 35 responses of which were also used to examine test-retest reliability. Cronbach's alpha coefficients (0.761) and ICC (0.738) indicated good reliability. The results of CFA based on the original three-dimensional structure did not indicate a good fit (CFA = 0.830, RMSEA = 0.088). EFA suggested a four-factor structure, two of which were almost consistent with the original two subscales. The correlation of the SACS score within wards was confirmed while a positive association with the actual use of seclusion/restraints was not identified. CONCLUSION While the original three-dimensional structure was not replicated, construct validity was partially confirmed. Reliability of the total scale was good. In Japan, although using the subscales was not recommended, using the total scale of SACS seemed acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiko Fukasawa
- Health Promotion Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Michi Miyake
- Department of Public Mental Health Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kikkawa
- Faculty of Nursing, Undergraduate School of Medicine, Tokai University, Isehara, Japan
| | - Tamio Sueyasu
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Bukkyo University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|