The role of 6-acetylmorphine in heroin-induced reward and locomotor sensitization in mice

Dopamine D3 receptor mediates natural and methamphetamine rewards via regulating the expression of miR-29c in the nucleus accumbens of mice

The dopamine D3 receptor (D3R), principally confined to the nucleus accumbens (NAc), is involved in regulating natural and drug rewards; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying the associated process remain unclear. Earlier research has reported the concurrent influence of D3R and miR-29c expressed in the NAc on methamphetamine (METH)-induced reward behaviors and microglial activation, hinting at regulatory roles in reward processing. Herein, we performed viral manipulation-mediating D3R/miR-29c overexpression and inhibition in the whole NAc in male D3R knockout and wild-type mice to investigate this potential relationship. Behavioral responses to the rewarding stimuli were assessed using sucrose preference score, METH-induced locomotor sensitization, and METH-induced conditioned place preference tests. Overall, we observed a notable decrease in the behavioral response to sucrose and METH in D3R-deficient mice, accompanied by the downregulation of miR-29c expression in the NAc. Diminished responses to those rewarding stimuli in D3R-deficient mice primarily stemmed from the reduction of GSK3β activity and subsequent down-regulation of miR-29c in the NAc. Microglial activation in the NAc mediates the effect of D3R-miR-29c deficiency on the reward effects of sucrose and METH. Pharmacological suppression of microglial activity rescued the reduced response in mice lacking D3R-miR-29c in the NAc. Overall, this study revealed the mechanism by which D3R regulates both natural and drug rewards via miR-29c in the murine NAc, highlighting the role of the NAc D3R-miR-29c pathway as a critical regulator of rewards, and providing new insights into the role of NAc D3R-miR-29c in encoding rewarding experiences.

Interactions of pain and opioids on conditioned place preference in rodents

RATIONALE

Opioid analgesics are the most effective medications used for the treatment of pain, however there are significant risks associated with repeated opioid use including opioid misuse and opioid use disorder development. Chronic pain affects millions of adults in the United States, and opioid misuse is often comorbid with pain conditions in individuals who are repeatedly treated with opioids. In addition to providing pain relief, opioids produce rewarding effects, but in chronic pain states, reward processing can become dysregulated. The conditioned place preference task is commonly used to measure the rewarding properties of opioids in rodents. During this task, opioid administration is paired with a distinct environment through repeated conditioning and the change in an animal's preference for the paired environment indicates whether the opioid is rewarding or not.

OBJECTIVES

Rodent pain models can be combined with conditioned place preference to examine the effects of pain on opioid reward. The existing preclinical literature on pain effects on conditioned place preference is conflicting, where pain conditions have been reported to enhance, suppress, or have no effect on opioid reward. This review will discuss several factors that may contribute to these discordant findings including conditioning session duration and number, rodent strain differences in opioid sensitivity, analgesic properties of opioids at tested doses, locomotor effects at tested doses, and diurnal variation in pain sensitivity. Future studies should consider how these factors contribute to opioid conditioned place preference in both pain and pain-free animals to have a better understanding of the interactions between pain and opioid reward.

Enhancing Protective Antibodies against Opioids through Antigen Display on Virus-like Particles

Opioid use disorder (OUD) has become a public health crisis, with recent significant increases in the number of deaths due to overdose. Vaccination can provide an attractive complementary strategy to combat OUD. A key for high vaccine efficacy is the induction of high levels of antibodies specific to the drug of abuse. Herein, a powerful immunogenic carrier, virus-like particle mutant bacteriophage Qβ (mQβ), has been investigated as a carrier of a small molecule hapten 6-AmHap mimicking heroin. The mQβ-6-AmHap conjugate was able to induce significantly higher levels of IgG antibodies against 6-AmHap than mice immunized with the corresponding tetanus toxoid-6-AmHap conjugate in head-to-head comparison studies in multiple strains of mice. The IgG antibody responses were persistent with high anti-6-AmHap titers 600 days after being immunized with mQβ-6-AmHap. The antibodies induced exhibited strong binding toward multiple heroin/morphine derivatives that have the potential to be abused, while binding weakly to medications used for OUD treatment and pain relief. Furthermore, vaccination effectively reduced the impacts of morphine on mice in both ambulation and antinociception assays, highlighting the translational potential of the mQβ-6-AmHap conjugate to mitigate the harmful effects of drugs of abuse.

Oxycodone, an opioid like the others?

The over-prescription of opioid analgesics is a growing problem in the field of addiction, which has reached epidemic-like proportions in North America. Over the past decade, oxycodone has gained attention as the leading opioid responsible for the North America opioid crisis. Oxycodone is the most incriminated drug in the early years of the epidemic of opioid use disorder in USA (roughly 1999-2016). The number of preclinical articles on oxycodone is rapidly increasing. Several publications have already compared oxycodone with other opioids, focusing mainly on their analgesic properties. The aim of this review is to focus on the genomic and epigenetic regulatory features of oxycodone compared with other opioid agonists. Our aim is to initiate a discussion of perceptible differences in the pharmacological response observed with these various opioids, particularly after repeated administration in preclinical models commonly used to study drug dependence potential.

Heroin metabolism in human blood and its impact for the design of an immunotherapeutic approach against heroin effects

Immunotherapeutic interventions that block drug effects by binding drug molecules to specific antibodies in the bloodstream have shown promising effects in animal studies. For heroin, which effects are mainly mediated by the metabolites 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM; also known as 6-monoacetylmorphine or 6-MAM) and morphine, the optimal antibody specificity has been discussed. In rodents, 6-AM specific antibodies have been recommended based on the rapid metabolism of heroin to 6-AM in the bloodstream. Since the metabolic rate of heroin in blood is unsettled in humans, we examined heroin metabolism with state-of-the-art analytical methodology (UHPLC-MS/MS) in freshly drawn human whole blood incubated with a wide range of heroin concentrations (1-500 μM). The half-life of heroin was highly concentration dependent, ranging from 1.2-1.7 min for concentrations at or above 25 μM, and gradually increasing to approximately 20 min for 1 μM heroin. At concentrations that can be attained in the bloodstream shortly after an i.v. injection, approximately 70% was transformed into 6-AM within 3 min, similar to previous observations in vivo. Our results indicate that blood enzymes play a more important role for the rapid metabolism of heroin in humans than previously assumed. This points to 6-AM as an important target for an efficient immunotherapeutic approach to block heroin effects in humans.

P-glycoprotein (MDR1/ABCB1) Restricts Brain Penetration of the Main Active Heroin Metabolites 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) and Morphine in Mice

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

Heroin (diacetylmorphine; diamorphine) is a highly addictive opioid prodrug. Heroin prescription is possible in some countries for chronic, treatment-refractory opioid-dependent patients and as a potent analgesic for specific indications. We aimed to study the pharmacokinetic interactions of heroin and its main pharmacodynamically active metabolites, 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM) and morphine, with the multidrug efflux transporters P-glycoprotein/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 using wild-type, Abcb1a/1b and Abcb1a/1b;Abcg2 knockout mice.

METHODS & RESULTS

Upon subcutaneous (s.c.) heroin administration, its blood levels decreased quickly, making it challenging to detect heroin even shortly after dosing. 6-MAM was the predominant active metabolite present in blood and most tissues. At 10 and 30 min after heroin administration, 6-MAM and morphine brain accumulation were increased about 2-fold when mouse (m)Abcb1a/1b and mAbcg2 were ablated. Fifteen minutes after direct s.c. administration of an equimolar dose of 6-MAM, we observed good intrinsic brain penetration of 6-MAM in wild-type mice. Still, mAbcb1 limited brain accumulation of 6-MAM and morphine without affecting their blood exposure, and possibly mediated their direct intestinal excretion. A minor contribution of mAbcg2 to these effects could not be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that mAbcb1a/1b can limit 6-MAM and morphine brain exposure. Pharmacodynamic behavioral/postural observations, while non-quantitative, supported moderately increased brain levels of 6-MAM and morphine in the knockout mouse strains. Variation in ABCB1 activity due to genetic polymorphisms or environmental factors (e.g., drug interactions) might affect 6-MAM/morphine exposure in individuals, but only to a limited extent.

Heroin and its metabolites: relevance to heroin use disorder

Heroin is an opioid agonist commonly abused for its rewarding effects. Since its synthesis at the end of the nineteenth century, its popularity as a recreational drug has ebbed and flowed. In the last three decades, heroin use has increased again, and yet the pharmacology of heroin is still poorly understood. After entering the body, heroin is rapidly deacetylated to 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), which is then deacetylated to morphine. Thus, drug addiction literature has long settled on the notion that heroin is little more than a pro-drug. In contrast to these former views, we will argue for a more complex interplay among heroin and its active metabolites: 6-MAM, morphine, and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). In particular, we propose that the complex temporal pattern of heroin effects results from the sequential, only partially overlapping, actions not only of 6-MAM, morphine, and M6G, but also of heroin per se, which, therefore, should not be seen as a mere brain-delivery system for its active metabolites. We will first review the literature concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of heroin and its metabolites, then examine their neural and behavioral effects, and finally discuss the possible implications of these data for a better understanding of opioid reward and heroin addiction. By so doing we hope to highlight research topics to be investigated by future clinical and pre-clinical studies.

Increased heroin intake and relapse vulnerability in intermittent relative to continuous self-administration: Sex differences in rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Studies using intermittent-access drug self-administration show increased motivation to take and seek cocaine and fentanyl, relative to continuous access. In this study, we examined the effects of intermittent- and continuous-access self-administration on heroin intake, patterns of self-administration and cue-induced heroin-seeking, after forced or voluntary abstinence, in male and female rats. We also modelled brain levels of heroin and its active metabolites.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Rats were trained to self-administer a palatable solution and then heroin (0.075 mg·kg^-1 per inf) either continuously (6 h·day^-1 ; 10 days) or intermittently (6 h·day^-1 ; 5-min access every 30-min; 10 days). Brain levels of heroin and its metabolites were modelled using a pharmacokinetic software. Next, heroin-seeking was assessed after 1 or 21 abstinence days. Between tests, rats underwent either forced or voluntary abstinence. The oestrous cycle was measured using a vaginal smear test.

KEY RESULTS

Intermittent access exacerbated heroin self-administration and was characterized by a burst-like intake, yielding higher brain peaks of heroin and 6-monoacetylmorphine concentrations. Moreover, intermittent access increased cue-induced heroin-seeking during early, but not late abstinence. Heroin-seeking was higher in females after intermittent, but not continuous access, and this effect was independent of the oestrous cycle.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Intermittent heroin access in rats resembles critical features of heroin use disorder: a self-administration pattern characterized by repeated large doses of heroin and higher relapse vulnerability during early abstinence. This has significant implications for refining animal models of substance use disorder and for better understanding of the neuroadaptations responsible for this disorder.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed issue on Advances in Opioid Pharmacology at the Time of the Opioid Epidemic. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v180.7/issuetoc.

Combined effects of quetiapine and opioids: A study of autopsy cases, drug users and sedation in rats

Fatal opioid poisonings often involve methadone or morphine. This study aimed to elucidate if quetiapine, a widely used sedative antipsychotic medication, may increase the risk of fatal opioid poisoning by additive inhibitory effects on the central nervous system. We used data from 323 cases of fatal methadone or/and morphine poisonings autopsied from 2013 to 2020, a survey of 34 drug users, and performed blinded placebo‐controlled studies in 75 Flinders Resistant Line rats receiving three cumulative intraperitoneal doses of vehicle, methadone (2.5, 10 and 15 mg/kg), morphine (3.75, 15 and 22.5 mg/kg), quetiapine (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg) or quetiapine combined with methadone or morphine. Quetiapine was detected in 20.4% of fatal opioid poisonings with a significantly increased frequency over time, primarily in low or therapeutic concentrations, and was not associated with methadone or morphine concentrations. Use of quetiapine, most commonly in low‐to‐moderate doses to obtain a sleep‐inducing or tranquillizing effect, was reported by 67.6% of survey respondents. In the animal studies, a significant impairment of sedation score, performance on the rotarod and open field mobility was observed in all treatment groups compared with vehicle. However, the effect of quetiapine plus the opioid was not significantly different from that of the opioid alone. Thus, no additive sedative effects were observed in rats. Our results suggest that quetiapine is more often an innocent bystander than a contributor to fatal opioid poisoning. However, the combined effects on other parameters, including blood pressure, cardiac rhythm and respiratory rate, need investigation.

Does the preparation for intravenous administration affect the composition of heroin injections? A controlled laboratory study

AIMS

To study whether the preparation procedure, and its acidic and heating conditions, used by heroin users to prepare heroin for intravenous administration affects the final composition of the fluid to be injected.

METHODS

Samples from different seizures of illegal heroin provided by the Norwegian police were prepared by adding water and ascorbic acid before heating under controlled conditions in the laboratory. Further, three seizures were prepared with different amounts of ascorbic or citric acid relative to their diacetylmorphine content. Pure diacetylmorphine base or salt was also submitted to the procedure applying two different heating intensities. The seizures and the final product after preparation were analysed for diacetylmorphine, 6-acetylmorphine and morphine using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS).

RESULTS

After preparation, a decrease of 19.8% (25th and 75th percentiles = -29.2 and -15.3) in the initial diacetylmorphine content was observed. Both the 6-acetylmorphine and morphine content increased but, due to their low content in the initial product, diacetylmorphine still represented 83.9% (25th and 75th percentiles = 77.3 and 88.0) of the sum of these three opioids in the final solution. The loss of water during preparation caused an increase in the concentration of diacetylmorphine, 6-acetylmorphine and morphine, depending on the heating intensity applied. The content of these opioids was affected by the quantity and type of acid added in relation to the heroin purity and the level of diacetylmorphine dissolved being proportional to the amount of ascorbic acid, but not citric acid, in the sample with high heroin purity.

CONCLUSIONS

Preparation of heroin for intravenous injection appears to change the amount or concentration of diacetylmorphine and its active metabolites, 6-acetylmorphine and morphine in the final product, depending on heroin purity, amount and type of acid used or heating conditions. These circumstances can contribute to unintentional variations in the potency of the final injected solution, and therefore affect the outcome after injection.

Identification of Morphine and Heroin-Treatment in Mice Using Metabonomics

Although heroin and morphine are structural analogues and morphine is a metabolite of heroin, it is not known how the effect of each substance on metabolites in vivo differs. Heroin and morphine were administered to C57BL/6J mice in increasing doses from 2 to 25 and 3 to 9 mg kg⁻¹ (twice a day, i.p.), respectively, for 20 days. The animals underwent withdrawal for 5 days and were readministered the drugs after 10 days. Serum and urine analytes were profiled using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and metabolic patterns were evaluated based on metabonomics data. Metabonomics data showed that heroin administration changed metabolic pattern, and heroin withdrawal did not quickly restore it to baseline levels. A relapse of heroin exposure changed metabolic pattern again. In contrast, although the administration of morphine changed metabolic pattern, whether from morphine withdrawal or relapse, metabolic pattern was similar to control levels. The analysis of metabolites showed that both heroin and morphine interfered with lipid metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and amino acid metabolism. In addition, both heroin and morphine increased the levels of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and citric acid but decreased the serum levels of 2-ketoglutaric acid and tryptophan. Moreover, heroin and morphine reduced the levels of aconitic acid, cysteine, glycine, and oxalic acid in urine. The results show 3-Hydroxybutyric acid, tryptophan, citric acid and 2-ketoglutaric acid can be used as potential markers of opiate abuse in serum, while oxalic acid, aconitic acid, cysteine, and glycine can be used as potential markers in urine.