Set-up of a population-based model to verify alcohol abstinence via monitoring of the direct alcohol marker phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1

Phosphatidylethanol (B-PEth) and other direct and indirect biomarkers of alcohol consumption

When identifying, preventing and treating alcohol use disorder, a correct estimation of alcohol intake is essential. An objective marker is preferred as self-reported alcohol intake suffers from bias, and the use of alcohol biomarkers is increasing globally. An easy-to-use blood biomarker to correctly assess alcohol consumption is an invaluable asset in alcohol treatment strategies, as well as in alcohol research studies. The specific, cumulative, biomarker phosphatidylethanol, mirroring the past two weeks of consumption, has shown superiority over traditional biomarkers and is an attractive choice of proxy for alcohol intake.

Artificial elevation of phosphatidylethanol due to red blood cell transfusion

INTRODUCTION

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a marker of alcohol consumption used in clinical and forensic settings. PEth positivity in individuals expected to abstain from alcohol can have serious consequences. PEth is located on erythrocytes, thus packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion is a potential cause of false-positive results. This report is the first to demonstrate this phenomenon in an authentic patient who was negative for PEth immediately prior to transfusion.

METHODS

Residual blood samples collected for clinical testing before and after pRBC transfusion and citrated pRBC segments were tested for PEth homologues 16:0/18:1 (POPEth) and 16:0/18:2 (PLPEth) by liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry with limit of quantitation 10 ng/mL (0.01 µmol/L).

CASE

A 56-year-old male with new-onset leukemia required transfusion of 4 pRBC units on hospital days 1-2. Blood collected at admission (day 0) showed POPEth and PLPEth < 10 ng/mL (<0.01 µmol/L). Blood collected after completion of the fourth pRBC transfusion demonstrated POPEth = 57 ng/mL (0.08 µmol/L), PLPEth = 38 ng/mL (0.05 µmol/L). One citrated segment demonstrated extremely elevated PEth, supporting pRBC transfusion as the source.

DISCUSSION

This case demonstrates pRBC transfusion elevating PEth to concentrations associated with moderate alcohol consumption. Studies suggest that healthy individuals (potential donors) could have PEth concentrations sufficient to cause significant elevation of PEth from a single pRBC unit. This is concerning for populations such as liver transplant candidates who are required to abstain from alcohol, but whose disease sequelae may require pRBC transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

pRBC transfusion can artificially elevate PEth into clinically and forensically relevant ranges. Individuals interpreting toxicology testing should consider recent pRBC transfusion when evaluating PEth concentrations.

Blood microsampling technologies: Innovations and applications in 2022

With the development of highly sensitive bioanalytical techniques, the volume of samples necessary for accurate analysis has reduced. Microsampling, the process of obtaining small amounts of blood, has thus gained popularity as it offers minimal-invasiveness, reduced logistical costs and biohazard risks while simultaneously showing increased sample stability and a potential for the decentralization of the approach and at-home self-sampling. Although the benefits of microsampling have been recognised, its adoption in clinical practice has been slow. Several microsampling technologies and devices are currently available and employed in research studies for various biomedical applications. This review provides an overview of the state-of-the-art in microsampling technology with a focus on the latest developments and advancements in the field of microsampling. Research published in the year 2022, including studies (i) developing strategies for the quantitation of analytes in microsamples and (ii) bridging and comparing the interchangeability between matrices and choice of technology for a given application, is reviewed to assess the advantages, challenges and limitations of the current state of microsampling. Successful implementation of microsampling in routine clinical care requires continued efforts for standardization and harmonization. Microsampling has been shown to facilitate data-rich studies and a patient-centric approach to healthcare and is foreseen to play a central role in the future digital revolution of healthcare through continuous monitoring to improve the quality of life.

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method to quantify the alcohol biomarker phosphatidylethanol 16:0/18:1 in dried blood spots for clinical research purposes

Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a group of phospholipids detectable in red blood cells exclusively following ethanol consumption. The primary PEth analog, PEth 16:0/18:1, has an extended half-life in red cells, providing a long window of detection and tremendous potential for the quantification of cumulative alcohol consumption. We developed and validated an LC/MS-MS method to quantify PEth 16:0/18:1 in dried blood spots (DBS) for clinical research purposes. Method development and validation followed FDA guidance but expanded on prior published methods through the evaluation of additional DBS-specific factors such as sample hematocrit, punch location, and spot volume. This method was applied to the quantification of PEth in participant samples.

Miniature mass spectrometer-based point-of-care assay for measuring phosphatidylethanol in blood

We demonstrate proof-of-concept for point-of-care assessment of long-term alcohol consumption by measuring phosphatidylethanol in blood/dried blood spots with nano-electrospray ionization and MS/MS using a miniature mass spectrometer. 'Abstinence', 'moderate', and 'chronic' consumption could be distinguished rapidly for both sample types, and quantitative performance was obtained with blood (LoQ-100 ng mL^-1).

PEth 16:0/18:1 and 16:0/18:2 after consumption of low doses of alcohol-A contribution to cutoff discussion

Phosphatidylethanol in blood has gained recognition as a direct alcohol biomarker. Although different cutoffs have been suggested, there is no consensus for differentiating abstinence from alcohol consumption. In this study, 75 participants (72% female) consumed 20 g of ethanol on three consecutive evenings. Blood was sampled on each following day and PEth 16:0/18:1 and 16:0/18:2 were determined. PEth 16:0/18:1 ranged from 8.9-21.5, 8.7-19.3, and 8.8-42.3 ng/ml and PEth 16:0/18:2 from 8.7-31.7, 9.0-39.3, and 9.4-43.0 ng/ml after the respective days of ethanol consumption. PEth 16:0/18:1 yielded a sensitivity of 25%, 45%, and 49% and PEth 16:0/18:2 of 40%, 61%, and 68% for the consumption days, respectively (cutoff 10 ng/ml). PEth 16:0/18:1 reached >20 ng/ml in five samples overall. Sensitivity of PEth 16:0/18:2 > 20 ng/ml was better with 35% after the three drinking days. Overall, PEth 16:0/18:1 was >35 ng/ml in one sample and PEth 16:0/18:2 in three samples. Significantly, more women had PEth 16:0/18:1 > 10 ng/ml after the third day of consuming 20 g of alcohol (p = 0.02) and PEth 16:0/18:2 > 10 ng/ml after the second (p = 0.023) and the third (p = 0.002) consumption, which can be led back to the higher blood alcohol concentration women reach after consuming the same alcohol amount as men. Although the response rates of PEth to alcohol uptake are subject to strong interindividual differences, results suggest that PEth cutoff should be lowered for better detection of consumption of low to medium amounts of alcohol. Furthermore, it is advantageous to analyze both PEth 16:0/18:2 and 16:0/18:1.