1
|
Jordan AE, Jette G, Graham JK, Burke C, Cunningham CO. Drug Overdose Death Following Substance Use Disorder Treatment Termination in New York City: A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Urban Health 2024; 101:1045-1057. [PMID: 39095494 PMCID: PMC11461374 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-024-00893-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Drug overdose death rates are the highest recorded in New York City (NYC). Substance use disorder (SUD) treatment termination can confer increased risk of drug overdose death. Our objective was to determine the probability of, and factors associated with, drug overdose death following SUD treatment termination. Using a retrospective longitudinal cohort design, we identified those who had NYC-based SUD treatment terminated (01/2016-06/2019) using Chief Medical Examiner and SUD treatment data. Using survival analyses, we examined drug overdose deaths ≤ 14 and ≤ 90 days following SUD treatment termination, respectively. Of 51,171 patients with SUD treatment termination, 140 and 342 had a drug overdose death < 14 and ≤ 90 days, respectively. The crude drug overdose death rate was 26.7 per 1000 person-years at-risk in the ≤ 90-day period and was 71.6 per 1000 person-years at-risk in the ≤ 14-day period. In adjusted Cox proportional hazard model examining death ≤ 14 days, those unemployed (compared to employed) and those terminated from residential treatment (compared to medically supervised withdrawal, opioid treatment programs, and outpatient treatment) were more likely to have had a drug overdose death (all p-values < 0.01). In adjusted Cox proportional hazard model examining death ≤ 90 days, non-Hispanic White people (compared to non-Hispanic Black people), those not stably housed (compared to stably housed), those unemployed and those terminated from residential treatment were more likely to have had a drug overdose death (all p-values < 0.01). Strategies to improve retention including the reassessment of program treatment termination criteria along with strategies to promote ongoing OUD treatment, engagement in harm reduction, and distribution of naloxone are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashly E Jordan
- New York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, New York City and Albany, NY, USA.
| | - Gail Jette
- New York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, New York City and Albany, NY, USA
| | - Jason K Graham
- New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constance Burke
- New York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, New York City and Albany, NY, USA
| | - Chinazo O Cunningham
- New York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, New York City and Albany, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sibley AL, Noar SM, Muessig KE, O'Shea NG, Paquette CE, Spears AG, Miller WC, Go VF. An Automated Text Messaging Intervention to Reduce Substance Use Self-Stigma (Project RESTART): Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e59224. [PMID: 39121478 PMCID: PMC11344186 DOI: 10.2196/59224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stigma is a barrier to treatment and harm reduction seeking in people who use drugs. Most stigma reduction interventions offer psychotherapy or psychoeducation in group-based clinical settings, failing to reach people who are not in treatment. SMS text messaging is an effective and acceptable modality for delivering health information to people who use drugs and may be a suitable conduit for providing information and advice to understand and cope with stigma. OBJECTIVE This paper presents the protocol for a study that aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a 4-week automated SMS text message intervention to increase stigma resistance and reduce self-stigma in people who use drugs. METHODS We designed a novel automated SMS text message intervention to address the four personal-level constructs of stigma resistance: (1) not believing stigma and catching and challenging stigmatizing thoughts, (2) empowering oneself through learning about substance use and one's recovery, (3) maintaining one's recovery and proving stigma wrong, and (4) developing a meaningful identity and purpose apart from one's substance use. Theory-based messages were developed and pilot-tested in qualitative elicitation interviews with 22 people who use drugs, resulting in a library of 56 messages. In a single-group, within-subjects, community-based pilot trial, we will enroll 30 participants in the Resisting Stigma and Revaluating Your Thoughts (RESTART) intervention. Participants will receive 2 daily SMS text messages for 4 weeks. Implementation feasibility will be assessed through recruitment, enrollment, retention, and message delivery statistics. User feasibility and acceptability will be assessed at follow-up using 23 survey items informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Primary effectiveness outcomes are changes in self-stigma (Substance Abuse Self-Stigma Scale) and stigma resistance (Stigma Resistance Scale) from baseline to follow-up measured via a self-administered survey. Secondary outcomes are changes in hope (Adult Dispositional Hope Scale) and self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale). Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed with descriptive statistics; effectiveness outcomes will be assessed with paired 2-tailed t tests, and group differences will be explored using ANOVA. Overall, 12 participants will also be selected to complete acceptability interviews. RESULTS This pilot study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse in April 2023 and received regulatory approval in January 2024 by the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board. Recruitment and enrollment began in March 2024. Follow-up visits are expected to conclude by May 2024. Results will be disseminated in relevant peer-reviewed journals. CONCLUSIONS To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to address substance use stigma via a self-help SMS text messaging program. Results will add to the nascent literature on stigma reduction in people who use drugs. This protocol may interest researchers who are considering text messaging to address psychosocial needs in hard-to-reach populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06281548; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06281548. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/59224.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adams L Sibley
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Seth M Noar
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Kathryn E Muessig
- Institute on Digital Health and Innovation, College of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States
| | - Nisha G O'Shea
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Catherine E Paquette
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | | | - William C Miller
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Vivian F Go
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knudsen HK, Walker DM, Mack N, Kinnard EN, Huerta TR, Glasgow L, Gilbert L, Garner BR, Dasgupta A, Chandler R, Walsh SL, Tin Y, Tan S, Sprunger J, Sprague-Martinez L, Salsberry P, Saucier M, Rudorf M, Rodriguez S, Oser CB, Oga E, Nakayima J, Linas BS, Lefebvre RC, Kosakowski S, Katz RE, Hunt T, Holman A, Holloway J, Goddard-Eckrich D, Fareed N, Christopher M, Aldrich A, Adams JW, Drainoni ML. Reducing perceived barriers to scaling up overdose education and naloxone distribution and medications for opioid use disorder in the United States in the HEALing (Helping End Addiction Long-Term®) communities study. Prev Med 2024; 185:108034. [PMID: 38857770 PMCID: PMC11269010 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scaling up overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is needed to reduce opioid overdose deaths, but barriers are pervasive. This study examines whether the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention reduced perceived barriers to expanding OEND and MOUD in healthcare/behavioral health, criminal-legal, and other/non-traditional venues. METHODS The HEALing (Helping End Addiction Long-Term®) Communities Study is a parallel, wait-list, cluster randomized trial testing the CTH intervention in 67 communities in the United States. Surveys administered to coalition members and key stakeholders measured the magnitude of perceived barriers to scaling up OEND and MOUD in November 2019-January 2020, May-June 2021, and May-June 2022. Multilevel linear mixed models compared Wave 1 (intervention) and Wave 2 (wait-list control) respondents. Interactions by rural/urban status and research site were tested. RESULTS Wave 1 respondents reported significantly greater reductions in mean scores for three outcomes: perceived barriers to scaling up OEND in Healthcare/Behavioral Health Venues (-0.26, 95% confidence interval, CI: -0.48, -0.05, p = 0.015), OEND in Other/Non-traditional Venues (-0.53, 95% CI: - 0.84, -0.22, p = 0.001) and MOUD in Other/Non-traditional Venues (-0.34, 95% CI: -0.62, -0.05, p = 0.020). There were significant interactions by research site for perceived barriers to scaling up OEND and MOUD in Criminal-Legal Venues. There were no significant interactions by rural/urban status. DISCUSSION The CTH Intervention reduced perceived barriers to scaling up OEND and MOUD in certain venues, with no difference in effectiveness between rural and urban communities. More research is needed to understand facilitators and barriers in different venues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K Knudsen
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Ohio State University, Suite 5000, 700 Ackerman Rd, Columbus, OH 43202, USA.
| | - Daniel M Walker
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Ohio State University, Suite 5000, 700 Ackerman Rd, Columbus, OH 43202, USA.
| | - Nicole Mack
- Center for Official Statistics, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Elizabeth N Kinnard
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| | - Timothy R Huerta
- CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, 540 W. Spring St., Columbus, OH 43215, USA.
| | - LaShawn Glasgow
- Center for Program and Policy Evaluation to Advance Community Health, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Louisa Gilbert
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - Bryan R Garner
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, 2050 Kenny Road Columbus, OH 43221, USA.
| | - Anindita Dasgupta
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - Redonna Chandler
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Ave, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 202, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.
| | - Yjuliana Tin
- General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Ave Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Sylvia Tan
- Center for Clinical Research, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Joel Sprunger
- Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3131 Harvey Ave, Suite 204, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | | | - Pamela Salsberry
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Merielle Saucier
- Clinical Addiction Research and Evaluation Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| | - Maria Rudorf
- General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| | - Sandra Rodriguez
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - Carrie B Oser
- Department of Sociology, Center on Drug & Alcohol Research, Center for Health Equity Transformation, University of Kentucky, 1531 Patterson Office Tower, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
| | - Emmanuel Oga
- Center for Public Health Surveillance and Technology, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Julie Nakayima
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.
| | - Beth S Linas
- Center for Public Health Surveillance and Technology, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - R Craig Lefebvre
- Communication Practice Area, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Sarah Kosakowski
- General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| | - Rachel E Katz
- Addiction Services, Clinical & Support Options, 8 Atwood Dr Suite 201, Northampton, MA 01060, USA.
| | - Timothy Hunt
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - Ari Holman
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - JaNae Holloway
- Center for Clinical Research, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Dawn Goddard-Eckrich
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, 1255 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - Naleef Fareed
- Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, 370 W. 9th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Mia Christopher
- Center for Public Health Surveillance and Technology, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Alison Aldrich
- CATALYST, Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, The Ohio State University, Suite 5000, 700 Ackerman Rd, Columbus, OH 43202, USA.
| | - Joella W Adams
- Center for Public Health Surveillance and Technology, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Mari-Lynn Drainoni
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, and Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Room 2014, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shulman M, Provost S, Ohrtman K, Novo P, Meyers-Ohki S, Van Veldhuisen P, Oden N, Otterstatter M, Bailey GL, Liu D, Rotrosen J, Nunes EV, Weiss RD. Discontinuation of medication treatment for opioid use disorder after a successful course: The discontinuation phase of the CTN-0100 (RDD) trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 142:107543. [PMID: 38657730 PMCID: PMC11180567 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Buprenorphine, and extended-release naltrexone, are effective in decreasing opioid use, morbidity and mortality. The available evidence suggests that these medications should be used for long term treatment; however, patients often ask how long they need to be on medication, and whether it would be safe to discontinue. There are sparse data to guide us. The CTN-0100 trial will address this gap in our knowledge by studying participants who have decided to discontinue buprenorphine and extended-release naltrexone for OUD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The trial is a multicenter, randomized, non-blinded study. Participants are stable adult volunteers, on sublingual buprenorphine, extended-release buprenorphine, or extended-release naltrexone, expressing an interest in discontinuing medication. Participants on buprenorphine must be stable for at least 1 year and participants on extended-release naltrexone must be stable for at least 6 months. Participants are engaged in the study for up to 96 weeks, including a flexible taper period, and are then transitioned to follow-up within the trial. All participants are randomly assigned to the study Medical Management (MM) or to MM plus Connections (CHESS health) digital smartphone application aimed at recovery and abstinence (MMD). Sublingual Buprenorphine participants are also randomized (2 × 2 design) to a taper using either sublingual or extended-release buprenorphine. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION It is hoped that this trial will provide a rich source of data on management of patients discontinuing medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) to inform future research and practice. The trial will shed light on which strategies are most likely to lead to long-term success (absence of relapse), and what participant characteristics distinguish those who can safely discontinue MOUD from those who remain at risk of relapse should they discontinue. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT04464980.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matisyahu Shulman
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, USA; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, USA.
| | | | | | - Patricia Novo
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Genie L Bailey
- Warren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University / Stanley Street Treatment and Resources, Inc., USA
| | - David Liu
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, USA
| | - John Rotrosen
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, USA
| | - Edward V Nunes
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, USA; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scheidell JD, Townsend TN, Zhou Q, Manandhar-Sasaki P, Rodriguez-Santana R, Jenkins M, Buchelli M, Charles DL, Frechette JM, Su JIS, Braithwaite RS. Reducing overdose deaths among persons with opioid use disorder in connecticut. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:103. [PMID: 38807226 PMCID: PMC11131266 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-01026-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People in Connecticut are now more likely to die of a drug-related overdose than a traffic accident. While Connecticut has had some success in slowing the rise in overdose death rates, substantial additional progress is necessary. METHODS We developed, verified, and calibrated a mechanistic simulation of alternative overdose prevention policy options, including scaling up naloxone (NLX) distribution in the community and medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) among people who are incarcerated (MOUD-INC) and in the community (MOUD-COM) in a simulated cohort of people with OUD in Connecticut. We estimated how maximally scaling up each option individually and in combinations would impact 5-year overdose deaths, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years. All costs were assessed in 2021 USD, employing a health sector perspective in base-case analyses and a societal perspective in sensitivity analyses, using a 3% discount rate and 5-year and lifetime time horizons. RESULTS Maximally scaling NLX alone reduces overdose deaths 20% in the next 5 years at a favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER); if injectable rather than intranasal NLX was distributed, 240 additional overdose deaths could be prevented. Maximally scaling MOUD-COM and MOUD-INC alone reduce overdose deaths by 14% and 6% respectively at favorable ICERS. Considering all permutations of scaling up policies, scaling NLX and MOUD-COM together is the cost-effective choice, reducing overdose deaths 32% at ICER $19,000/QALY. In sensitivity analyses using a societal perspective, all policy options were cost saving and overdose deaths reduced 33% over 5 years while saving society $338,000 per capita over the simulated cohort lifetime. CONCLUSIONS Maximally scaling access to naloxone and MOUD in the community can reduce 5-year overdose deaths by 32% among people with OUD in Connecticut under realistic budget scenarios. If societal cost savings due to increased productivity and reduced crime costs are considered, one-third of overdose deaths can be reduced by maximally scaling all three policy options, while saving money.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy D Scheidell
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Central Florida, PO Box 160000, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.
| | - Tarlise N Townsend
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qinlian Zhou
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Prima Manandhar-Sasaki
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Ramon Rodriguez-Santana
- HIV Prevention Program, Connecticut Department of Public Health, 410 Capitol Avenue, MS #11APV, Hartford, CT, 06134-0308, USA
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Connecticut Harm Reduction Alliance, 28 Grand St, Hartford, CT, 06106, USA
| | - Marianne Buchelli
- HIV Prevention Program, Connecticut Department of Public Health, 410 Capitol Avenue, MS #11APV, Hartford, CT, 06134-0308, USA
- TB, HIV, STD and Viral Hepatitis Section, Connecticut Department of Public Health, 410 Capitol Avenue, MS #11APV, Hartford, CT, 06134, USA
| | - Dyanna L Charles
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Jillian M Frechette
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Jasmine I-Shin Su
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - R Scott Braithwaite
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pasman E, Lee G, Singer S, Burson N, Agius E, Resko SM. Attitudes toward medications for opioid use disorder among peer recovery specialists. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2024; 50:391-400. [PMID: 38640497 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2332597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Background: Peer recovery specialists (PRSs) are substance use service providers with lived experience in recovery. Although a large body of research demonstrates the efficacy of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), emerging research suggests PRSs' attitudes toward MOUD are ambivalent or mixed. Few studies have quantitatively assessed factors influencing PRSs' attitudes.Objectives: This study identifies personal and professional characteristics associated with attitudes toward MOUD among PRSs.Methods: PRSs working at publicly funded agencies in Michigan completed a self-administered web-based survey (N = 266, 60.5% women). Surveys assessed socio-demographics, treatment and recovery history, attitudes toward clients, and attitudes toward MOUD. Multiple linear regression was used to identify factors associated with attitudes toward MOUD.Results: A minority of PRSs (21.4%) reported a history of treatment with MOUD, while nearly two-thirds reported current 12-step involvement (62.5%). Compared to PRSs without a history of MOUD treatment, PRSs who had positive (b = 4.71, p < .001) and mixed (b = 3.36, p = .010) experiences with MOUD had more positive attitudes; PRSs with negative experiences with MOUD had less positive attitudes (b = -3.16, p = .003). Current 12-step involvement (b = -1.63, p = .007) and more stigmatizing attitudes toward clients (b = -.294, p < .001) were associated with less positive attitudes toward MOUD. Black PRSs had less positive attitudes than White PRSs (b = -2.50, p = .001), and women had more positive attitudes than men (b = 1.19, p = .038).Conclusion: PRSs' attitudes toward MOUD varied based on the nature of their lived experience. Findings highlight considerations for training and supervising PRSs who serve individuals with opioid use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Pasman
- Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Guijin Lee
- Department of Counseling and Human Development Services, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Samantha Singer
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Nick Burson
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Elizabeth Agius
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Stella M Resko
- School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choi SA, Yan CH, Gastala NM, Touchette DR, Stranges PM. Cost-effectiveness of full and partial opioid agonists for opioid use disorder in outpatient settings: United States healthcare sector perspective. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 160:209237. [PMID: 38061629 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies show that medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce illicit opioid use, emergency healthcare services, opioid-related overdose, and death. However, few studies have investigated the long-term cost-effectiveness of MOUD in office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) and opioid treatment program (OTP) settings. We aimed to estimate the cost, utility, quality-adjusted life years gained (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of three MOUD compared to each other and counseling without medication from a US healthcare sector perspective. METHODS Our study developed a Markov model to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of counseling and three MOUD in the OBOT and OTP settings: sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (BUPNX), buprenorphine extended-release (XR-BUP) injection, and oral methadone. The model included five health states representing combinations of receiving or off treatment while either using or not actively using illicit opioids, and death. The cycle length was one month; the time-horizon was ten years. The study obtained model inputs from systematic reviews of published literature and public data. A 3 % annual discount rate was applied to cost and utility calculation. The primary outcomes included total costs, life-years (LYs), QALYs, and ICERs. We also conducted a scenario analysis using a hypothetical OBOT outpatient setting with methadone. RESULTS In the base-case OBOT setting, the total costs and QALYs, respectively, were counseling $22,848, 5.60; BUPNX $29,875, 5.82; and XR-BUP $63,936, 5.87. ICERs were $32,345/QALY (BUPNX vs. counseling) and $625,858/QALY (XR-BUP vs BUPNX). In the OTP setting, the total costs of counseling, methadone, BUPNX, and XR-BUP were $20,124, $27,000, $33,500, and $75,272, respectively. QALYs of methadone were 5.86. QALYs of counseling, BUPNX, and XR-BUP remained the same as in the OBOT setting. Incremental ICERs were $26,714/QALY (methadone vs counseling) and $3,337,623/QALY (XR-BUP vs methadone). BUPNX was dominated by methadone. In the scenario analysis, BUPNX was also dominated by methadone. CONCLUSIONS Outpatient MOUD resulted in important gains in quality of life and life expectancy. In both OBOT and OTP settings, XR-BUP was not cost-effective. BUPNX was cost-effective in the OBOT setting, while it was dominated by methadone in the OTP setting. The cost-effectiveness of BUPNX and XR-BUP could be enhanced if the costs of these medications were reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun A Choi
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street MC 871, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | - Connie H Yan
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street MC 871, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | - Nicole M Gastala
- Department of Family Medicine, Mile Square Health Centers, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Science Systems, 1220 S. Wood St., 60608 Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Daniel R Touchette
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street MC 871, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | - Paul M Stranges
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street Rm C-300, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wyse JJ, Eckhardt A, Waller D, Gordon AJ, Shull S, Lovejoy TI, Mackey K, Morasco BJ. Patients' Perspectives on Discontinuing Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. J Addict Med 2024; 18:300-305. [PMID: 38498620 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Buprenorphine and other medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are recommended as standard of care in the treatment of OUD and are associated with positive health and addiction-related outcomes. Despite benefits, discontinuation is common, with half of patients discontinuing in the first year of treatment. Addressing OUD is a major clinical priority, yet little is known about the causes of medication discontinuation from the patient perspective. METHODS From March 2021 to April 2022, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients who had discontinued buprenorphine for the treatment of OUD within the past 12 months. Eligible participants were selected from 2 Veterans Health Administration Health Care Systems in Oregon. Coding and analysis were guided by conventional qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Twenty participants completed an interview; 90% were White and 90% were male, and the mean age was 54.2 years. Before discontinuation, participants had received buprenorphine for 8.3 months on average (range, 1-40 months); 80% had received buprenorphine for less than 12 months. Qualitative analysis identified the following themes relating to discontinuation: health system barriers (eg, logistical hurdles, rules and policy violations), medication effects (adverse effects; attributed adverse effects, lack of efficacy in treating chronic pain) and desire for opioid use. Patient description of decisions to discontinue buprenorphine could be multicausal, reflecting provider or system-level barriers in interaction with patient complexity or medication ambivalence. CONCLUSIONS Study results identify several actionable ways OUD treatment could be modified to enhance patient retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Wyse
- From the Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR (JJW, AE, DW, SS, TIL, KM, BJM); School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR (JJW); Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT (AJG); Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT (AJG); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (TIL, BJM); and VA Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, Portland, OR (TIL)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Durrance CP, Austin AE, Runyan CW, Runyan DK, Martin SL, Mercer J, Shanahan ME. Affordable housing through the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program and opioid overdose emergency department visits. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 158:209249. [PMID: 38081542 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The United States continues to experience an opioid overdose crisis. As a key social determinant of health, housing insecurity may contribute to initiation of substance use and can threaten outcomes for those with substance use disorders by increasing stress, risky substance use, discontinuity of treatment, and return to use, all of which may increase the risk of overdose. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program supports access to rental housing for low-income populations. By facilitating access to affordable housing, this program may improve housing security, thereby reducing overdose risk. METHODS We used data from LIHTC Property Data and the State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) to identify the number of LIHTC units available and opioid overdoses discharged from the emergency department (ED) in 13 states between 2005 and 2014. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2014, mean opioid overdose ED visits were higher in states with fewer LIHTC units (<28 LIHTC units per 100,000 population) at 26.5 per 100,000 population as compared to states with higher LIHTC units (≥28 LIHTC units per 100,000 population) at 21.1 per 100,000. We find that greater availability of LIHTC units was associated with decreased rates of opioid overdose ED visits (RR 0.94; CI 0.90, 1.00). CONCLUSIONS Given the importance of housing as a key social determinant of health, the provision of affordable housing may mitigate substance misuse and prevent nonfatal opioid overdose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna E Austin
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America
| | - Carol W Runyan
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, United States of America; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America
| | - Desmond K Runyan
- Department of Pediatrics and Kempe Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Sandra L Martin
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America
| | - Jeremy Mercer
- Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America
| | - Meghan E Shanahan
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bechtol AC, Ramage M, Krulikas LJ, Futrell K, Caron O. Naloxone access in perinatal substance use disorder. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2024:102026. [PMID: 38320652 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk of fatal drug overdose is higher in pregnant and postpartum people with substance use disorder (SUD) than for nonpregnant women of reproductive age. It is recommended that naloxone is prescribed for pregnancies complicated by opioid or stimulant use disorder. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the rates of naloxone coprescribing with buprenorphine in a perinatal SUD (PSUD) specialty clinic and identify opportunities for pharmacist-led interventions to improve communication and documentation surrounding naloxone access to achieve a rate of 100% coprescribing of naloxone with buprenorphine. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION A clinical pharmacist practitioner is embedded on the Project CARA (Care that Advocates Respect/Resilience/Recovery for All) team, which provides outpatient SUD care integrated with perinatal care in Western North Carolina. PRACTICE INNOVATION The clinical pharmacist practitioner assessed baseline rates of naloxone coprescribing with medications for opioid use disorder. Interventions to improve rates of coprescribing include provider education, electronic health record (EHR) documentation templates, and direct patient outreach. EVALUATION METHODS Baseline rates of naloxone coprescribing were assessed and then re-evaluated after different interventions to measure pharmacist impact. RESULTS Each intervention improved rates of naloxone coprescribing in a PSUD clinic. EHR documentation templates had the largest impact on baseline efforts, although the long-term benefits derived from these efforts have not yet been demonstrated. Substantial time investment from the pharmacist was required to address patients' barriers to obtaining naloxone after their visits. CONCLUSION Further process improvement should address barriers to naloxone access for both patients and providers. This may include proactive identification of patients in need of naloxone and a "meds-to-beds" pilot to assist patients in navigating logistical challenges.
Collapse
|
11
|
Green EW, Byers IS, Deutsch-Link S. Closing the Care Gap: Management of Alcohol Use Disorder in Patients with Alcohol-associated Liver Disease. Clin Ther 2023; 45:1189-1200. [PMID: 38052695 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD)-related morbidity and mortality are rising in the United States. Although effective medications and behavioral interventions are available for the treatment of patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD), patients with ALD are profoundly undertreated for AUD. This article reviews the management of AUD in patients with ALD, with a focus on appropriate screening and diagnosis, management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, pharmacotherapy for AUD, alcohol biomarkers, and behavioral interventions. Expanding access to AUD treatment is imperative for improving health outcomes in patients with ALD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen W Green
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Isabelle S Byers
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sasha Deutsch-Link
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shang M, Thiel B, Liebschutz JM, Kraemer KL, Freund A, Jawa R. Implementing harm reduction kits in an office-based addiction treatment program. Harm Reduct J 2023; 20:163. [PMID: 37919741 PMCID: PMC10621216 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00897-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rising rates of drug use-related complications call for a paradigm shift in the care for people who use drugs. While addiction treatment and harm reduction have historically been siloed in the US, co-location of these services in office-based addiction treatment (OBAT) settings offers a more realistic and patient-centered approach. We describe a quality improvement program on integrating harm reduction kits into an urban OBAT clinic. METHODS After engaging appropriate stakeholders and delivering clinician and staff trainings on safer use best practices, we developed a clinical workflow for universal offering and distribution of pre-packaged kits coupled with patient-facing educational handouts. We assessed: (1) kit uptake with kit number and types distributed; and (2) implementation outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and patient perceptions. RESULTS One-month post-implementation, 28% (40/141) of completed in-person visits had at least one kit request, and a total of 121 kits were distributed. Staff and clinicians found the program to be highly feasible, acceptable, and appropriate, and patient perceptions were positive. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating kits in OBAT settings is an important step toward increasing patient access and utilization of life-saving services. Our program uncovered a significant unmet need among our patients, suggesting that kit integration within addiction treatment can improve the standard of care for people who use drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Shang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brent Thiel
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jane M Liebschutz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for Research on Healthcare, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3609 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Kevin L Kraemer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for Research on Healthcare, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3609 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Ariana Freund
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Raagini Jawa
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Center for Research on Healthcare, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3609 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Slocum S, Paquette CE, Walley AY, Pollini RA. Civil commitment perspectives and experiences among friends and family of people who use illicit opioids in Massachusetts, USA. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 117:104074. [PMID: 37244144 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Civil commitment statutes allow qualified individuals to petition for court-mandated commitment for someone with a substance use disorder (SUD). Despite a lack of empirical evidence showing efficacy of involuntary commitment, these statutes are prevalent worldwide. We examined perspectives on civil commitment among family members and close friends of people who use illicit opioids in Massachusetts, U.S.A. METHODS Eligible individuals were Massachusetts residents, ≥18 years of age, did not use illicit opioids but had a close relationship with someone who did. We used a sequential mixed methods approach in which semi-structured interviews (N=22) were followed by a quantitative survey (N=260). Thematic analysis was used to analyze qualitative data and survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS While some family members were influenced by SUD professionals to petition for civil commitment, influence from social networks based on personal experience was more common. Motivations for civil commitment included initiating recovery and believing that commitment would reduce overdose risk. Some reported that it afforded them respite from caring for, and worrying about, their loved one. A minority discussed increases in overdose risk following a period of forced abstinence. Participants expressed concerns about the variable quality of care during commitment, largely based on the use of corrections facilities for civil commitment in Massachusetts. A minority endorsed the use of these facilities for civil commitment. CONCLUSIONS Despite participants' uncertainty and the harms stemming from civil commitment, including increased risk of overdose after forced abstinence and the use of corrections facilities, family members resorted to this mechanism to reduce immediate overdose risk. Our findings indicate that peer support groups are an appropriate forum to disseminate information about evidenced-based treatment and that family members and others close to those with SUD often lack adequate support for, and respite from, the stress of caring for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susannah Slocum
- Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States
| | - Catherine E Paquette
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Alexander Y Walley
- Grayken Center for Addiction, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robin A Pollini
- Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bailey SR, Wyte-Lake T, Lucas JA, Williams S, Cantone RE, Garvey BT, Hallock-Koppelman L, Angier H, Cohen DJ. Use of Telehealth for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in Safety Net Primary Care Settings: A Mixed-Methods Study. Subst Use Misuse 2023; 58:1143-1151. [PMID: 37170596 PMCID: PMC10396057 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2212378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a marked increase in telehealth for the provision of primary care-based opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. This mixed methods study examines characteristics associated with having the majority of OUD-related visits via telehealth versus in-person, and changes in mode of delivery (in-person, telephone, video) over time. Methods: Logistic regression was performed using electronic health record data from patients with ≥1 visit with an OUD diagnosis to ≥1 of the two study clinics (Rural Health Clinic; urban Federally Qualified Health Center) and ≥1 OUD medication ordered from 3/8/2020-9/1/2021, with >50% of OUD visits via telehealth (vs. >50% in-person) as the dependent variable and patient characteristics as independent variables. Changes in visit type over time were also examined. Inductive coding was used to analyze data from interviews with clinical team members (n = 10) who provide OUD care to understand decision-making around visit type. Results: New patients (vs. returning; OR = 0.47;95%CI:0.27-0.83), those with ≥1 psychiatric diagnosis (vs. none; OR = 0.49,95%CI:0.29-0.82), and rural clinic patients (vs. urban; OR = 0.05; 95%CI:0.03-0.08) had lower odds of having the majority of visits via telehealth than in-person. Patterns of visit type varied over time by clinic, with the majority of telehealth visits delivered via telephone. Team members described flexibility for patients as a key telehealth benefit, but described in-person visits as more conducive to building rapport with new patients and those with increased psychological burden. Conclusion: Understanding how and why telehealth is used for OUD treatment is critical for ensuring access to care and informing OUD-related policy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffani R Bailey
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Tamar Wyte-Lake
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jennifer A Lucas
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Shannon Williams
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Rebecca E Cantone
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Brian T Garvey
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Heather Angier
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Deborah J Cohen
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wyse JJ, Lovejoy TI, Gordon AJ, Mackey K, Herreid-O'Neill A, Morasco BJ. "I'm Clean and Sober, But Not Necessarily Free": Perceptions of Buprenorphine Among Patients in Long-Term Treatment. Subst Abus 2023; 44:41-50. [PMID: 37226910 PMCID: PMC11132627 DOI: 10.1177/08897077231165625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients receiving buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) experience a roughly 50% reduction in mortality risk relative to those not receiving medication. Longer periods of treatment are also associated with improved clinical outcomes. Despite this, patients often express desires to discontinue treatment and some view taper as treatment success. Little is known about the beliefs and medication perspectives of patients engaged in long-term buprenorphine treatment that may underlie motivations to discontinue. METHODS This study was conducted at the VA Portland Health Care System (2019-2020). Qualitative interviews were conducted with participants prescribed buprenorphine for ≥2 years. Coding and analysis were guided by directed qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Fourteen patients engaged in office-based buprenorphine treatment completed interviews. While patients expressed strong enthusiasm for buprenorphine as a medication, the majority expressed the desire to discontinue, including patients actively tapering. Motivations to discontinue fell into 4 categories. First, patients were troubled by perceived side effects of the medication, including effects on sleep, emotion, and memory. Second, patients expressed unhappiness with being "dependent" on buprenorphine, framed in opposition to personal strength/independence. Third, patients expressed stigmatized beliefs about buprenorphine, describing it as "illicit," and associated with past drug use. Finally, patients expressed fears about buprenorphine unknowns, including potential long-term health effects and interactions with medications required for surgery. CONCLUSIONS Despite recognizing benefits, many patients engaged in long-term buprenorphine treatment express a desire to discontinue. Findings from this study may help clinicians anticipate patient concerns and can be used to inform shared decision-making conversations regarding buprenorphine treatment duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Wyse
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Travis I Lovejoy
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Epidemiology & Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Katherine Mackey
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Anders Herreid-O'Neill
- Oregon Rural Practice Network (ORPRN), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin J Morasco
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|