Exome sequencing identifies a novel frameshift mutation of MYO6 as the cause of autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss in a Chinese family

Review and research gap identification in genetics causes of syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss in Saudi Arabia

Congenital hearing loss is one of the most common sensory disabilities worldwide. The genetic causes of hearing loss account for 50% of hearing loss. Genetic causes of hearing loss can be classified as nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) or syndromic hearing loss (SHL). NSHL is defined as a partial or complete hearing loss without additional phenotypes; however, SHL, known as hearing loss, is associated with other phenotypes. Both types follow a simple Mendelian inheritance fashion. Several studies have been conducted to uncover the genetic factors contributing to NSHL and SHL in Saudi patients. However, these studies have encountered certain limitations. This review assesses and discusses the genetic factors underpinning NSHL and SHL globally, with a specific emphasis on the Saudi Arabian context. It also explores the prevalence of the most observed genetic causes of NSHL and SHL in Saudi Arabia. It also sheds light on areas where further research is needed to fully understand the genetic foundations of hearing loss in the Saudi population. This review identifies several gaps in research in NSHL and SHL and provides insights into potential research to be conducted.

Novel mutation leading to splice donor loss in a conserved site of DMD gene causes Duchenne muscular dystrophy with cryptorchidism

BACKGROUND

As one of the most common congenital abnormalities in male births, cryptorchidism has been found to have a polygenic aetiology according to previous studies of common variants. However, little is known about genetic predisposition of rare variants for cryptorchidism, since rare variants have larger effective size on diseases than common variants.

METHODS

In this study, a cohort of 115 Chinese probands with cryptorchidism was analysed using whole-genome sequencing, alongside 19 parental controls and 2136 unaffected men. Additionally, CRISPR-Cas9 editing of a conserved variant was performed in a mouse model, with MRI screening used to observe the phenotype.

RESULTS

In 30 of 115 patients (26.1%), we identified four novel genes (ARSH, DMD, MAGEA4 and SHROOM2) affecting at least five unrelated patients and four known genes (USP9Y, UBA1, BCORL1 and KDM6A) with the candidate rare pathogenic variants affecting at least two cases. Burden tests of rare variants revealed the genome-wide significances for newly identified genes (p<2.5×10-6) under the Bonferroni correction. Surprisingly, novel and known genes were mainly found on X chromosome (seven on X and one on Y) and all rare X-chromosomal segregating variants exhibited a maternal inheritance rather than de novo origin. CRISPR-Cas9 mouse modelling of a splice donor loss variant in DMD (NC_000023.11:g.32454661C>G), which resides in a conserved site across vertebrates, replicated bilateral cryptorchidism phenotypes, confirmed by MRI at 4 and 10 weeks. The movement tests further revealed symptoms of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in transgenic mice.

CONCLUSION

Our results revealed the role of the DMD gene mutation in causing cryptorchidism. The results also suggest that maternal-X inheritance of pathogenic defects could have a predominant role in the development of cryptorchidism.

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis Reveals a Novel Genetic Variant in MYO6 Gene in an Indian Family with Postlingual Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss

Background: Hereditary nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) is an extremely heterogeneous disorder, both genetically and clinically. Myosin VI (MYO6) pathogenic variations have been reported to cause both prelingual and postlingual forms of NSHL. Postlingual autosomal dominant cases are often overlooked for genetic etiology in clinical setups. In this study, we used next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based targeted deafness gene panel assay to identify the cause of postlingual hearing loss in an Indian family. Methods: The proband and his father from a multigenerational Indian family affected by postlingual hearing loss were examined via targeted capture of 129 deafness genes, after excluding gap junction protein beta 2 (GJB2) pathogenic variants by Sanger sequencing. NGS data analysis and co-segregation of the candidate variants in the family were carried out. The variant effect was predicted by in silico tools and interpreted following American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines. Results: A novel heterozygous transversion c.3225T>G, p.(Tyr1075*) in MYO6 gene was identified as the disease-causing variant in this family. This stop-gained variant is predicted to form a truncated myosin VI protein, which is devoid of crucial cargo-binding domain. PCR-RFLP screening in 200 NSHL cases and 200 normal-hearing controls showed the absence of this variant indicating its de novo nature in the population. Furthermore, we reviewed MYO6 variants reported from various populations to date. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first family with MYO6-associated hearing loss from an Indian population. The study also highlights the importance of deafness gene panels in molecular diagnosis of GJB2-negative pedigrees, contributing to genetic counseling in the affected families.

Autosomal Dominant Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (DFNA): A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (HL) typically occurs when only one dominant allele within the disease gene is sufficient to express the phenotype. Therefore, most patients diagnosed with autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL have a hearing-impaired parent, although de novo mutations should be considered in all cases of negative family history. To date, more than 50 genes and 80 loci have been identified for autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL. DFNA22 (MYO6 gene), DFNA8/12 (TECTA gene), DFNA20/26 (ACTG1 gene), DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1 gene), DFNA15 (POU4F3 gene), DFNA2A (KCNQ4 gene), and DFNA10 (EYA4 gene) are some of the most common forms of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL. The characteristics of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL are heterogenous. However, in most cases, HL tends to be bilateral, post-lingual in onset (childhood to early adulthood), high-frequency (sloping audiometric configuration), progressive, and variable in severity (mild to profound degree). DFNA1 (DIAPH1 gene) and DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1 gene) are the most common forms of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL affecting low frequencies, while DFNA16 (unknown gene) is characterized by fluctuating HL. A long audiological follow-up is of paramount importance to identify hearing threshold deteriorations early and ensure prompt treatment with hearing aids or cochlear implants.

Predicting pathogenicity for novel hearing loss mutations based on genetic and protein structure approaches

Hearing loss is a heterogeneous disorder. Identification of causative mutations is demanding due to genetic heterogeneity. In this study, we investigated the genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss in patients with severe/profound deafness. After the exclusion of GJB2-GJB6 mutations, we performed whole exome sequencing in 32 unrelated Argentinean families. Mutations were detected in 16 known deafness genes in 20 patients: ACTG1, ADGRV1 (GPR98), CDH23, COL4A3, COL4A5, DFNA5 (GSDDE), EYA4, LARS2, LOXHD1, MITF, MYO6, MYO7A, TECTA, TMPRSS3, USH2A and WSF1. Notably, 11 variants affecting 9 different non-GJB2 genes resulted novel: c.12829C > T, p.(Arg4277*) in ADGRV1; c.337del, p.(Asp109*) and c.3352del, p.(Gly1118Alafs*7) in CDH23; c.3500G > A, p.(Gly1167Glu) in COL4A3; c.1183C > T, p.(Pro395Ser) and c.1759C > T, p.(Pro587Ser) in COL4A5; c.580 + 2 T > C in EYA4; c.1481dup, p.(Leu495Profs*31) in LARS2; c.1939 T > C, p.(Phe647Leu), in MYO6; c.733C > T, p.(Gln245*) in MYO7A and c.242C > G, p.(Ser81*) in TMPRSS3 genes. To predict the effect of these variants, novel protein modeling and protein stability analysis were employed. These results highlight the value of whole exome sequencing to identify candidate variants, as well as bioinformatic strategies to infer their pathogenicity.

Myosin VI Haploinsufficiency Reduced Hearing Ability in Mice

In human, myosin VI (MYO6) haploinsufficiency causes postlingual progressive hearing loss. Because the usefulness of mouse models remains unclear, we produced novel Myo6 null (-/-) mutant mice and analyzed the hearing phenotypes of Myo6^+/- (+/-) heterozygous mutants. We first recorded and compared the auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in control Myo6^+/+ (+/+) wild-type and +/- mice. These hearing phenotypes of +/- mice were mild; however, we confirmed that +/- mice developed progressive hearing loss. In particular, the hearing loss of female +/- mice progressed faster than that of male +/- mice. The stereocilia bundles of +/- mice exhibited progressive taper loss in cochlear inner hair cells (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs). The loss of OHCs in +/- heterozygotes occurred at an earlier age than in +/+ mice. In particular, the OHCs at the basal area of the cochlea were decreased in +/- mice. IHC ribbon synapses from the area at the base of the cochlea were significantly reduced in +/- mice. Thus, our study indicated that MYO6 haploinsufficiency affected the detection of sounds in mice, and we suggest that +/- mice with Myo6 null alleles are useful animal models for gene therapy and drug treatment in patients with progressive hearing loss due to MYO6 haploinsufficiency.

High Prevalence of MYO6 Variants in an Austrian Patient Cohort With Autosomal Dominant Hereditary Hearing Loss

INTRODUCTION

Genetic hearing loss (HL) is often monogenic. Whereas more than half of autosomal recessive (AR) cases in Austria are caused by mutations in a single gene, no disproportionately frequent contributing genetic factor has been identified in cases of autosomal dominant (AD) HL. The genetic characterization of HL continues to improve diagnosis, genetic counseling, and lays a foundation for the development of personalized medicine approaches.

METHODS

Diagnostic HL panel screening was performed in an Austrian multiplex family with AD HL, and segregation was tested with polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. In an independent approach, 18 unrelated patients with AD HL were screened for causative variants in all known HL genes to date and segregation was tested if additional family members were available. The pathogenicity of novel variants was assessed based on previous literature and bioinformatic tools such as prediction software and protein modeling.

RESULTS

In six of the 19 families under study, candidate pathogenic variants were identified in MYO6, including three novel variants (p.Gln441Pro, p.Ser612Tyr, and p.Gln650ValfsTer7). Some patients carried more than one likely pathogenic variant in known deafness genes.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest a potential high prevalence of MYO6 variants in Austrian cases of AD HL. The presence of multiple rare HL variants in some patients highlights the relevance of considering multiple-hit diagnoses for genetic counseling and targeted therapy design.

Clinical Characteristics and In Vitro Analysis of MYO6 Variants Causing Late-Onset Progressive Hearing Loss

MYO6 is known as a genetic cause of autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive inherited hearing loss. In this study, to clarify the frequency and clinical characteristics of hearing loss caused by MYO6 gene mutations, a large-scale genetic analysis of Japanese patients with hearing loss was performed. By means of massively parallel DNA sequencing (MPS) using next-generation sequencing for 8074 Japanese families, we found 27 MYO6 variants in 33 families, 22 of which are novel. In total, 2.40% of autosomal dominant sensorineural hearing loss (ADSNHL) in families in this study (32 out of 1336) was found to be caused by MYO6 mutations. The present study clarified that most cases showed juvenile-onset progressive hearing loss and their hearing deteriorated markedly after 40 years of age. The estimated hearing deterioration was found to be 0.57 dB per year; when restricted to change after 40 years of age, the deterioration speed was accelerated to 1.07 dB per year. To obtain supportive evidence for pathogenicity, variants identified in the patients were introduced to MYO6 cDNA by site-directed mutagenesis and overexpressed in epithelial cells. They were then assessed for their effects on espin1-induced microvilli formation. Cells with wildtype myosin 6 and espin1 co-expressed created long microvilli, while co-expression with mutant constructs resulted in severely shortened microvilli. In conclusion, the present data clearly showed that MYO6 is one of the genes to keep in mind with regard to ADSNHL, and the molecular characteristics of the identified gene variants suggest that a possible pathology seems to result from malformed stereocilia of the cochlear hair cells.

A clinical guidance to DFNA22 drawn from a Korean cohort study with an autosomal dominant deaf population: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The MYO6 gene, if altered, can cause nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) either in an autosomal dominant (AD) (DFNA22) or recessive form. The present study identified MYO6 variants in the cohort of Korean AD NSHL families and investigated the audiological phenotypes of DFNA22 with respect to suggesting clinical guides for the counseling of DFNA22.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 81 AD NSHL families in two hospitals. Among them, five families (SH21, SB60, SB247, SB290 and SB305) segregating with MYO6 variant were genetically and clinically assessed.

RESULTS

We identified two novel missense variants of MYO6: p.G223R (SB290) and p.T158R (SB305). A known heterozygous truncation variant, p.R205X, reported previously (SH21, SB60), was identified (SB247). The overall frequency of DFNA22 among such cases was 6.2%. Specifically, we found p.R205X from three of five DFNA22 families (60%). Five DFNA22 families demonstrated extremely diverse audiogram configurations and age of onset with even intrafamilial variations, whereas the severity of hearing loss mostly ranged within moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a recurring predominant allele and two new missense variants of MYO6, highlighting the significant contribution of MYO6 to AD NSHL in the Korean population. Extremely diverse audiological configurations of DFNA22 suggest that MYO6 should be considered in future genetic studies of patients with AD NSHL. Gradual progression with a good speech audiometry score could provide physicians with clinical insight with respect to advising patients to use hearing aids or consider middle ear implants, whereas, in the case of certain exceptional circumstances, physicians could provide patients with the option to consider a cochlear implant.

Massively Parallel Sequencing for Genetic Diagnosis of Hearing Loss: The New Standard of Care

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of new genetic sequencing techniques for comprehensive genetic testing for hearing loss.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar databases using pertinent search terms.

REVIEW METHODS

Literature search identified 30 studies as candidates that met search criteria. Three studies were excluded, and 8 studies were found to be case reports. Twenty studies were included for review analysis, including 7 studies that evaluated controls and 16 studies that evaluated patients with unknown causes of hearing loss; 3 studies evaluated both controls and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 20 studies included in the review analysis, 426 control samples and 603 patients with unknown causes of hearing loss underwent comprehensive genetic diagnosis for hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing. Control analysis showed a sensitivity and specificity >99%, sufficient for clinical use of these tests. The overall diagnostic rate was 41% (range, 10%-83%) and varied based on several factors, including inheritance and prescreening prior to comprehensive testing. There were significant differences in platforms available with regard to the number and type of genes included and whether copy number variations were examined. Based on these results, comprehensive genetic testing should form the cornerstone of a tiered approach to clinical evaluation of patients with hearing loss along with history, physical examination, and audiometry and can determine further testing that may be required, if any.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Comprehensive genetic testing has become the new standard of care for genetic testing for patients with sensorineural hearing loss.