1
|
Dacosta-Sánchez D, Michelini Y, Pilatti A, Fernández-Calderón F, Lozano ÓM, González-Ponce BM. The moderating role of sex in the relationship between cannabis use treatment admission profile and treatment processes and outcomes: A gender perspective. Addict Behav 2024; 157:108103. [PMID: 39018615 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gender-specific interventions are crucial in addressing substance use disorders -particularly cannabis use disorder - as they allow for tailored therapeutic approaches and increase the likelihood of successful outcomes. However, differences in therapeutic processes and outcomes between males and females are often not observed, making the prognosis and development of such interventions more difficult. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the moderating role of sex in the relationship between treatment admission profile characterized by indicators of cannabis use and sociodemographic sources of gender inequality (e.g., employment status) and adherence and outcome at discharge. METHOD A multicentric retrospective observational study was conducted with a sample of 3,814 outpatients diagnosed with cannabis use disorder. Electronic health records were used for data analysis. RESULTS The interaction between sex and the number of children, as well as pre-treatment cannabis use, predicted lower treatment adherence, particularly among females. Additionally, the interaction between sex and the number of children predicted outcomes at discharge, with females showing a higher likelihood of dropout compared to males. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Enhanced comprehensive treatment with intensified contingency management programs should be prioritized for females (especially those with children) who have consumed cannabis in the month before treatment. Adopting a treatment policy framework incorporating sex/gender-sensitive therapist training and evaluative measures is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Dacosta-Sánchez
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, University of Huelva, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, 21071 Huelva, Spain; Research Center on Natural Resources, Health and the Environment, University of Huelva, Huelva 21007, Spain.
| | - Yanina Michelini
- Faculty of Psychology, National University of Cordoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina; Institute of Psychological Research, IIPsi-CONICET-UNC, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina.
| | - Angelina Pilatti
- Faculty of Psychology, National University of Cordoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina; Institute of Psychological Research, IIPsi-CONICET-UNC, National University of Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina.
| | - Fermín Fernández-Calderón
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, University of Huelva, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, 21071 Huelva, Spain; Research Center on Natural Resources, Health and the Environment, University of Huelva, Huelva 21007, Spain.
| | - Óscar M Lozano
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, University of Huelva, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, 21071 Huelva, Spain; Research Center on Natural Resources, Health and the Environment, University of Huelva, Huelva 21007, Spain.
| | - Bella M González-Ponce
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, University of Huelva, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, 21071 Huelva, Spain; Research Center on Natural Resources, Health and the Environment, University of Huelva, Huelva 21007, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Macatee RJ, Cannon MJ, Schermitzler BS, Preston TJ, Afshar K. Biological sex and hormonal contraceptive associations with drug cue reactivity in cannabis use disorder. J Psychiatr Res 2024; 174:121-128. [PMID: 38626562 PMCID: PMC11195151 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
Biological sex differences in Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) progression, cannabis withdrawal severity, and pharmacotherapy response have been reported, suggesting that CUD mechanisms may differ by sex. Drug cue reactivity is an established predictor of drug use behavior, but the literature on sex differences in drug cue reactivity is mixed, including in CUD. One possible moderator of sex differences in drug cue reactivity is hormonal contraceptive (HC) use. The aim of the present study was to test whether sex differences in neural cannabis cue reactivity and craving varied by female HC use in a CUD sample. As part of a larger study, 152 adults reporting frequent cannabis use completed a drug cue reactivity task during electrocenphalogram recording. Late positive potential (LPP) amplitude modulation by cannabis cues was used to measure neural cue reactivity. Craving after the cue reactivity task was also assessed. Males (n = 74) and naturally-cycling females (n = 26), who did not differ from each other, showed significantly greater LPP enhancement to cannabis vs. neutral cues compared to HC-using females (n = 52), an effect mostly driven by neutral cues. Craving was significantly higher in naturally-cycling but not HC-using females compared to males, but only in covariate-unadjusted analyses. Exploratory analyses of HC and menstrual phase characteristics indicate a progesterone-related mechanism may underlie HC effects on cannabis cue reactivity. The present study's results suggest that mixed findings on drug cue reactivity sex differences may be due to variability in HC use, which has implications for sex-specific models of CUD progression and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Kaveh Afshar
- Auburn University, Department of Psychological Sciences, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sahlem GL, Kim B, Baker NL, Wong BL, Caruso MA, Campbell LA, Kaloani I, Sherman BJ, Ford TJ, Musleh AH, Kim JP, Williams NR, Manett AJ, Kratter IH, Short EB, Killeen TK, George MS, McRae-Clark AL. A preliminary randomized controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in treatment seeking participants with cannabis use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 254:111035. [PMID: 38043228 PMCID: PMC10837319 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a common and consequential disorder. When applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) reduces craving across substance use disorders and may have therapeutic clinical effects when applied in serial-sessions. The present study sought to preliminarily determine whether serial-sessions of rTMS applied to the DLPFC had a therapeutic effect in CUD. METHODS This study was a two-site, phase-2, double-blind, randomized-controlled-trial. Seventy-two treatment-seeking participants (37.5% Women, mean age 30.2±9.9SD) with ≥moderate-CUD were randomized to active or sham rTMS (Beam-F3, 10Hz, 20-total-sessions, two-sessions-per-visit, two-visits-per-week, with cannabis cues) while undergoing a three-session motivational enhancement therapy intervention. The primary outcome was the change in craving between pre- and post- treatment (Marijuana Craving Questionnaire Short-Form-MCQ-SF). Secondary outcomes included the number of weeks of abstinence and the number of days-per-week of cannabis use during 4-weeks of follow-up. RESULTS There were no significant differences in craving between conditions. Participants who received active-rTMS reported numerically, but not significantly, more weeks of abstinence in the follow-up period than those who received sham-rTMS (15.5%-Active; 9.3%-Sham; rate ratio = 1.66 [95% CI: 0.84, 3.28]; p=0.14). Participants who received active-rTMS reported fewer days-per-week of cannabis use over the final two-weeks of the follow-up period than those receiving sham-rTMS (Active vs. Sham: -0.72; Z=-2.33, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS This trial suggests rTMS is safe and feasible in individuals with CUD and may have a therapeutic effect on frequency of cannabis use, though further study is needed with additional rTMS-sessions and a longer follow-up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory L Sahlem
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| | - Bohye Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Nathaniel L Baker
- Departments of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brendan L Wong
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Margaret A Caruso
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Lauren A Campbell
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Irakli Kaloani
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Brian J Sherman
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Tiffany J Ford
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Ahmad H Musleh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jane P Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Nolan R Williams
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Manett
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Ian H Kratter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Edward B Short
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Terese K Killeen
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Departments of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Aimee L McRae-Clark
- Departments of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Preto MC, Kortas GT, Blaas IK, Lassi DLS, Waisman Campos M, Torales J, Ventriglio A, de Azevedo-Marques Périco C, de Andrade AG, Castaldelli-Maia JM. Unravelling the landscape of Cannabis craving pharmacological treatments: a PRISMA-guided review of evidence. Int Rev Psychiatry 2023; 35:434-449. [PMID: 38299652 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2023.2231540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Currently, few treatments are available for craving in general, and none of them have received approval for cannabis craving. The objective of this review is to evaluate existing studies analysing treatments for cannabis craving and explore novel treatment possibilities for these patients. The study followed PRISMA guidelines and conducted an extensive database search. Inclusion criteria included human randomised controlled trials examining drug effects on craving symptoms. Exclusion criteria involved studies unrelated to craving, non-pharmacological treatments, duplicates, and non-English/Spanish/Portuguese articles. Our included 22 studies that investigated a wide range of compounds used for cravings related to other drugs, as well as interventions based on healthcare professionals' empirical knowledge. The current pharmacological treatments largely involve off-label drug use and the utilisation of cannabinoid-based medications, such as combinations of THC and lofexidine, oxytocin, progesterone, and N-acetylcysteine. These emerging treatments show promise and have the potential to revolutionise current clinical practices, but further investigation is needed to establish their efficacy. In this context, it is essential to consider non-pharmacological interventions, such as psychotherapy and behavioural treatments. These approaches play a crucial role in complementing pharmacological interventions and addressing the complex nature of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayra Cruz Preto
- Medical School, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Trevizan Kortas
- Perdizes Intitute (IPer), Clinics Hospital of Medical School (HCFMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Sirio-Libanês Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Israel Kanaan Blaas
- Perdizes Intitute (IPer), Clinics Hospital of Medical School (HCFMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical School, FMABC University Center, Santo André, Brazil
| | - Dangela Layne Silva Lassi
- Perdizes Intitute (IPer), Clinics Hospital of Medical School (HCFMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcela Waisman Campos
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, and Neuropsychology, FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Julio Torales
- Department of Medical Psychology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Asuncion, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
| | - Antonio Ventriglio
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Medical School, Medical School, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Arthur Guerra de Andrade
- Perdizes Intitute (IPer), Clinics Hospital of Medical School (HCFMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Sirio-Libanês Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical School, FMABC University Center, Santo André, Brazil
| | - João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical School, FMABC University Center, Santo André, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sahlem GL, Kim B, Baker NL, Wong BL, Caruso MA, Campbell LA, Kaloani I, Sherman BJ, Ford TJ, Musleh AH, Kim JP, Williams NR, Manett AJ, Kratter IH, Short EB, Killeen TK, George MS, McRae-Clark AL. A Preliminary Investigation Of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applied To The Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex In Treatment Seeking Participants With Cannabis Use Disorder. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.07.10.23292461. [PMID: 37503294 PMCID: PMC10370231 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.10.23292461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Background Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a common and consequential disorder. When applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) reduces craving across substance use disorders and may have a therapeutic clinical effect when applied in serial sessions. The present study sought to preliminarily determine whether serial sessions of rTMS applied to the DLPFC had a therapeutic effect in CUD. Methods This study was a two-site, phase-2, double-blind, randomized-controlled-trial. Seventy-two treatment-seeking participants (37.5% Women, mean age 30.2±9.9SD) with ≥moderate-CUD were randomized to active or sham rTMS (Beam-F3, 10Hz, 20-total-sessions, with cannabis cues) while undergoing a three-session motivational enhancement therapy intervention. The primary outcome was the change in craving between pre- and post-treatment (Marijuana Craving Questionnaire Short-Form-MCQ-SF). Secondary outcomes included the number of weeks of abstinence and the number of days-per-week of cannabis use during 4-weeks of follow-up. Results There were no significant differences in craving between conditions. Participants who received active rTMS reported numerically, but not significantly, more weeks of abstinence in the follow-up period than those who received sham rTMS (15.5%-Active; 9.3%-Sham; rate ratio = 1.66 [95% CI: 0.84, 3.28]; p=0.14). Participants who received active rTMS reported fewer days-per-week of cannabis use over the final two-weeks of the follow-up period (Active vs. Sham: -0.72; Z=-2.33, p=0.02). Conclusions This trial suggests rTMS is safe and feasible in individuals with CUD and may have a therapeutic effect on frequency of cannabis use, though further study is needed with additional rTMS-sessions and a longer follow-up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory L. Sahlem
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Bohye Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Nathaniel L. Baker
- Departments of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brendan L. Wong
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Margaret A. Caruso
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Lauren A. Campbell
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Irakli Kaloani
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Brian J. Sherman
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Tiffany J. Ford
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Ahmad H. Musleh
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jane P. Kim
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Nolan R. Williams
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Andrew J. Manett
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ian H. Kratter
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Edward B. Short
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Terese K. Killeen
- Departments of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Mark S. George
- Departments of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Aimee L. McRae-Clark
- Departments of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McKee SA, McRae-Clark AL. Consideration of sex and gender differences in addiction medication response. Biol Sex Differ 2022; 13:34. [PMID: 35761351 PMCID: PMC9235243 DOI: 10.1186/s13293-022-00441-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Substance use continues to contribute to significant morbidity and mortality in the United States, for both women and men, more so than another other preventable health condition. To reduce the public health burden attributable to substances, the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism have identified that medication development for substance use disorder is a high priority research area. Furthermore, both Institutes have stated that research on sex and gender differences in substance use medication development is a critical area. The purpose of the current narrative review is to highlight how sex and gender have been considered (or not) in medication trials for substance use disorders to clarify and summarize what is known regarding sex and gender differences in efficacy and to provide direction to the field to advance medication development that is consistent with current NIH 'sex as a biological variable' (SABV) policy. To that end, we reviewed major classes of abused substances (nicotine, alcohol, cocaine, cannabis, opioids) demonstrating that, sex and gender have not been well-considered in addiction medication development research. However, when adequate data on sex and gender differences have been evaluated (i.e., in tobacco cessation), clinically significant differences in response have been identified between women and men. Across the other drugs of abuse reviewed, data also suggest sex and gender may be predictive of outcome for some agents, although the relatively low representation of women in clinical research samples limits making definitive conclusions. We recommend the incorporation of sex and gender into clinical care guidelines and improved access to publicly available sex-stratified data from medication development investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry A. McKee
- Yale School of Medicine, 2 Church St South, Suite 109, New Haven, CT 06519 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bahji A, Meyyappan AC, Hawken ER, Tibbo PG. Pharmacotherapies for cannabis use disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2021; 97:103295. [PMID: 34062288 PMCID: PMC8881089 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the efficacy and acceptability of pharmacotherapies for cannabis use disorder (CUD). METHODS We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis, searching five electronic databases for randomized placebo-controlled trials of individuals diagnosed with CUD receiving pharmacotherapy with or without concomitant psychotherapy. Primary outcomes were the reduction in cannabis use and retention in treatment. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, discontinuation due to adverse events, total abstinence, withdrawal symptoms, cravings, and CUD severity. We applied a frequentist, random-effects Network Meta-Analysis model to pool effect sizes across trials using standardized mean differences (SMD, g) and rate ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS We identified a total of 24 trials (n=1912, 74.9% male, mean age 30.2 years). Nabilone (d=-4.47 [-8.15; -0.79]), topiramate (d=-3.80 [-7.06; -0.54]), and fatty-acid amyl hydroxylase inhibitors (d=-2.30 [-4.75; 0.15]) reduced cannabis use relative to placebo. Dronabinol improved retention in treatment (RR=1.27 [1.02; 1.57]), while topiramate worsened treatment retention (RR=0.62 [0.42; 0.91]). Gabapentin reduced cannabis cravings (d=-2.42 [-3.53; -1.32], while vilazodone worsened craving severity (d=1.69 [0.71; 2.66]. Buspirone (RR=1.14 [1.00; 1.29]), venlafaxine (RR=1.78 [1.40; 2.26]), and topiramate (RR=9.10 [1.27; 65.11]) caused more adverse events, while topiramate caused more dropouts due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Based on this review, some medications appeared to show promise for treating individual aspects of CUD. However, there is a lack of robust evidence to support any particular pharmacological treatment. There is a need for additional studies to expand the evidence base for CUD pharmacotherapy. While medication strategies may become an integral component for CUD treatment one day, psychosocial interventions should remain the first line given the limitations in the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anees Bahji
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
| | - Arthi Chinna Meyyappan
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Centre for Neurosciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Providence Care Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Emily R Hawken
- Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Centre for Neurosciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Providence Care Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Philip G Tibbo
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada; Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McPherson KL, Tomasi DG, Wang GJ, Manza P, Volkow ND. Cannabis Affects Cerebellar Volume and Sleep Differently in Men and Women. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:643193. [PMID: 34054601 PMCID: PMC8155508 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There are known sex differences in behavioral and clinical outcomes associated with drugs of abuse, including cannabis. However, little is known about how chronic cannabis use and sex interact to affect brain structure, particularly in regions with high cannabinoid receptor expression, such as the cerebellum, amygdala, and hippocampus. Based on behavioral data suggesting that females may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of chronic cannabis use, we hypothesized lower volumes in these regions in female cannabis users. We also hypothesized poorer sleep quality among female cannabis users, given recent findings highlighting the importance of sleep for many outcomes related to cannabis use disorder. Methods: Using data from the Human Connectome Project, we examined 170 chronic cannabis users (>100 lifetime uses and/or a lifetime diagnosis of cannabis dependence) and 170 controls that we attempted to match on age, sex, BMI, race, tobacco use, and alcohol use. We performed group-by-sex ANOVAs, testing for an interaction in subcortical volumes, and in self-reported sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Questionnaire Inventory). Results: After controlling for total intracranial volume and past/current tobacco usage, we found that cannabis users relative to controls had smaller cerebellum volume and poorer sleep quality, and these effects were driven by the female cannabis users (i.e., a group-by-sex interaction). Among cannabis users, there was an age of first use-by-sex interaction in sleep quality, such that females with earlier age of first cannabis use tended to have more self-reported sleep issues, whereas this trend was not present among male cannabis users. The amygdala volume was smaller in cannabis users than in non-users but the group by sex interaction was not significant. Conclusions: These data corroborate prior findings that females may be more sensitive to the neural and behavioral effects of chronic cannabis use than males. Further work is needed to determine if reduced cerebellar and amygdala volumes contribute to sleep impairments in cannabis users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine L. McPherson
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Dardo G. Tomasi
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Gene-Jack Wang
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Peter Manza
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Nora D. Volkow
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lees R, Hines LA, D'Souza DC, Stothart G, Di Forti M, Hoch E, Freeman TP. Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for cannabis use disorder and mental health comorbidities: a narrative review. Psychol Med 2021; 51:353-364. [PMID: 33536109 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720005449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug worldwide, and it is estimated that up to 30% of people who use cannabis will develop a cannabis use disorder (CUD). Demand for treatment of CUD is increasing in almost every region of the world and cannabis use is highly comorbid with mental disorders, where sustained use can reduce treatment compliance and increase risk of relapse. In this narrative review, we outline evidence for psychosocial and pharmacological treatment strategies for CUD, both alone and when comorbid with psychosis, anxiety or depression. Psychosocial treatments such as cognitive behavioural therapy, motivational enhancement therapy and contingency management are currently the most effective strategy for treating CUD but are of limited benefit when comorbid with psychosis. Pharmacological treatments targeting the endocannabinoid system have the potential to reduce cannabis withdrawal and cannabis use in CUD. Mental health comorbidities including anxiety, depression and psychosis hinder effective treatment and should be addressed in treatment provision and clinical decision making to reduce the global burden of CUDs. Antipsychotic medication may decrease cannabis use and cannabis craving as well as psychotic symptoms in patients with CUD and psychosis. Targeted treatments for anxiety and depression when comorbid with CUD are feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Lees
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Lindsey A Hines
- Population Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Deepak Cyril D'Souza
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Marta Di Forti
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eva Hoch
- Cannabinoid Research and Treatment Group, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tom P Freeman
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mariani JJ, Pavlicova M, Jean Choi C, Basaraba C, Carpenter KM, Mahony AL, Brooks DJ, Bisaga A, Naqvi N, Nunes EV, Levin FR. Quetiapine treatment for cannabis use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 218:108366. [PMID: 33153828 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKROUND Pharmacotherapy for cannabis use disorder (CUD) is an important unmet public health need. METHODS In a 12-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, the efficacy of quetiapine (300 mg nightly) for the treatment of CUD was tested in 130 outpatients. Weekly cannabis use was categorized into three groups: heavy use (5-7 days), moderate use (2-4 days) and light use (0-1 days). RESULTS At baseline both groups were considered heavy users (using days per week: median = 7.0; interquartile range (IQR): 6.5-7.0; daily dollar value: median = $121.4; IQR: 73.8-206.3). The week-by-treatment interaction was marginally significant (χ2(2) = 5.56, P = .06). With each week, the odds of moderate compared to heavy use significantly increased in the quetiapine group (OR=1.17, P < .0001), but not significantly in the placebo group (OR=1.05, P = .16). The odds of light versus heavy use did not significantly differ over time (P = .12). Treatment was also associated with reduced cannabis withdrawal symptoms by 10.4% each week (95% CI: 8.9-11.8). No serious adverse events occurred during the study and no evidence of development of a movement disorder was detected. Adverse effects were not significantly different between the quetiapine and placebo treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS The use of quetiapine to treat CUD was associated with an increased likelihood of heavy frequency use transitioning to moderate use, but not light use. The clinical significance of reductions in cannabis use, short of abstinence warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Mariani
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Martina Pavlicova
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - C Jean Choi
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division of Mental Health Data Science, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Cale Basaraba
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division of Mental Health Data Science, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Kenneth M Carpenter
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Amy L Mahony
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Daniel J Brooks
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Adam Bisaga
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Nasir Naqvi
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Edward V Nunes
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Frances R Levin
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Division on Substance Use Disorders, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kondo KK, Morasco BJ, Nugent SM, Ayers CK, O'Neil ME, Freeman M, Kansagara D. Pharmacotherapy for the Treatment of Cannabis Use Disorder: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172:398-412. [PMID: 32120384 DOI: 10.7326/m19-1105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a growing concern, and evidence-based data are needed to inform treatment options. PURPOSE To review the benefits and risks of pharmacotherapies for the treatment of CUD. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and clinical trial registries from inception through September 2019. STUDY SELECTION Pharmacotherapy trials of adults or adolescents with CUD that targeted cannabis abstinence or reduction, treatment retention, withdrawal symptoms, and other outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and confirmed by a second. Study quality was dually assessed, and strength of evidence (SOE) was determined by consensus according to standard criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS Across 26 trials, the evidence was largely insufficient. Low-strength evidence was found that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) do not reduce cannabis use or improve treatment retention. Low- to moderate-strength evidence was found that buspirone does not improve outcomes and that cannabinoids do not increase abstinence rates (moderate SOE), reduce cannabis use (low SOE), or increase treatment retention (low SOE). Across all drug studies, no consistent evidence of increased harm was found. LIMITATIONS Few methodologically rigorous trials have been done. Existing trials are hampered by small sample sizes, high attrition rates, and heterogeneity of concurrent interventions and outcomes assessment. CONCLUSION Although data on pharmacologic interventions for CUD are scarce, evidence exists that several drug classes, including cannabinoids and SSRIs, are ineffective. Because of increasing access to and use of cannabis in the general population, along with a high prevalence of CUD among current cannabis users, an urgent need exists for more research to identify effective pharmacologic treatments. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (PROSPERO: CRD42018108064).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karli K Kondo
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.K.K., B.J.M., S.M.N., M.E.O., D.K.)
| | - Benjamin J Morasco
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.K.K., B.J.M., S.M.N., M.E.O., D.K.)
| | - Shannon M Nugent
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.K.K., B.J.M., S.M.N., M.E.O., D.K.)
| | - Chelsea K Ayers
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (C.K.A., M.F.)
| | - Maya E O'Neil
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.K.K., B.J.M., S.M.N., M.E.O., D.K.)
| | - Michele Freeman
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (C.K.A., M.F.)
| | - Devan Kansagara
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (K.K.K., B.J.M., S.M.N., M.E.O., D.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Depressive symptoms and cannabis use in a placebo-controlled trial of N-Acetylcysteine for adult cannabis use disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2020; 237:479-490. [PMID: 31712969 PMCID: PMC7024037 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05384-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Depression is common among individuals with cannabis use disorder (CUD), particularly individuals who present to CUD treatment. Treatments that consider this comorbidity are essential. OBJECTIVES The goal of this secondary analysis was to examine whether N-acetylcysteine (NAC) reduced depressive symptoms among adults (age 18-50) with CUD (N = 302) and whether the effect of NAC on cannabis cessation varied as a result of baseline levels of depression. Bidirectional associations between cannabis use amount and depression were also examined. METHODS Data for this secondary analysis were from a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (NIDA CTN) multi-site clinical trial for CUD. Adults with CUD (N = 302) were randomized to receive 2400 mg of NAC daily or matched placebo for 12 weeks. All participants received abstinence-based contingency management. Cannabis quantity was measured by self-report, and weekly urinary cannabinoid levels (11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol) confirmed abstinence. Depressive symptoms were measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS Depressive symptoms did not differ between the NAC and placebo groups during treatment. There was no significant interaction between treatment and baseline depression predicting cannabis abstinence during treatment. Higher baseline depression was associated with decreased abstinence throughout treatment and a significant gender interaction suggested that this may be particularly true for females. Cross-lagged panel models suggested that depressive symptoms preceded increased cannabis use amounts (in grams) during the subsequent month. The reverse pathway was not significant (i.e., greater cannabis use preceding depressive symptoms). CONCLUSIONS Results from this study suggest that depression may be a risk factor for poor CUD treatment outcome and therefore should be addressed in the context of treatment. However, results do not support the use of NAC to concurrently treat co-occurring depressive symptoms and CUD in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01675661.
Collapse
|
13
|
Brabete AC, Greaves L, Hemsing N, Stinson J. Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis in Cannabis Treatment Outcomes: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17030872. [PMID: 32019247 PMCID: PMC7037030 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
There is evidence that sex- and gender-related factors are involved in cannabis patterns of use, health effects and biological mechanisms. Women and men report different cannabis use disorder (CUD) symptoms, with women reporting worse withdrawal symptoms than men. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of cannabis pharmacological interventions for women and men and the uptake of sex- and gender-based analysis in the included studies. Two reviewers performed the full-paper screening, and data was extracted by one researcher. The search yielded 6098 unique records—of which, 68 were full-paper screened. Four articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. From the randomized clinical studies of pharmacological interventions, few studies report sex-disaggregated outcomes for women and men. Despite emergent evidence showing the influence of sex and gender factors in cannabis research, sex-disaggregated outcomes in pharmacological interventions is lacking. Sex- and gender-based analysis is incipient in the included articles. Future research should explore more comprehensive inclusion of sex- and gender-related aspects in pharmacological treatments for CUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea C. Brabete
- Centre of Excellence for Women´s Health, E311-4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada; (L.G.); (N.H.); (J.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-514-621-8601
| | - Lorraine Greaves
- Centre of Excellence for Women´s Health, E311-4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada; (L.G.); (N.H.); (J.S.)
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Natalie Hemsing
- Centre of Excellence for Women´s Health, E311-4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada; (L.G.); (N.H.); (J.S.)
| | - Julie Stinson
- Centre of Excellence for Women´s Health, E311-4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada; (L.G.); (N.H.); (J.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nielsen S, Sabioni P, Gowing L, Le Foll B. Pharmacotherapies for Cannabis Use Disorders: Clinical Challenges and Promising Therapeutic Agents. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2020; 258:355-372. [PMID: 31375922 DOI: 10.1007/164_2019_258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This chapter reviews pharmacotherapies that have been trialled for cannabis dependence, identifying those that warrant further research and those of little or uncertain value. A diverse range of medicines have been tested, representing a broad range of pharmacological strategies. These include tetrahydrocannabinol preparations, various types of antidepressant, anxiolytics, a glutamatergic modulator and the neuropeptide oxytocin. Cannabinoid agonists warrant further research. For the FAAH inhibitor PF-04457845, oxytocin, varenicline and gabapentin, although there is a signal to indicate further research is warranted, these medications do not yet have sufficient evidence to support clinical use, and larger, longer-term trials are needed in representative treatment-seeking populations. Special populations that warrant consideration are those with cannabis dependence and concurrent mental health conditions and those that develop dependence through therapeutic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Nielsen
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Pamela Sabioni
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Linda Gowing
- Discipline of Pharmacology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Acute Care Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Departments of Family and Community Medicine, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haney M, Cooper ZD, Bedi G, Herrmann E, Comer SD, Reed SC, Foltin RW, Levin FR. Guanfacine decreases symptoms of cannabis withdrawal in daily cannabis smokers. Addict Biol 2019; 24:707-716. [PMID: 29659126 DOI: 10.1111/adb.12621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The α2a-adrenergic agonist, lofexidine, reduced cannabis withdrawal-related sleep disruption in the laboratory, but side effects (e.g. fatigue, hypotension) limit its utility as a treatment for cannabis use disorder. This study tested the potential efficacy and tolerability of a daily bedtime administration of the FDA-approved α2a-adrenergic agonist, guanfacine, in a human laboratory model of cannabis use disorder. Daily, nontreatment-seeking cannabis smokers (13M, 2F) completed a within-subject study comprising two 9-day inpatient study phases. Each phase tested the effects of daily placebo or immediate-release guanfacine (2 mg) on cannabis intoxication (5.6 percent THC; 2 days), withdrawal (4 days of abstinence) and subsequent 'relapse' (3 days of cannabis self-administration). Ratings of mood, sleep, cardiovascular effects, food intake, psychomotor performance and cannabis self-administration were assessed. An outpatient phase preceded each inpatient phase for medication clearance or dose induction. Under placebo medication conditions, cannabis abstinence produced significant withdrawal, including irritability, sleep disruption and anorexia. Guanfacine reduced ratings of irritability and improved objective measures of sleep during cannabis withdrawal relative to placebo but did not reduce cannabis self-administration. Guanfacine was well tolerated with little evidence of fatigue and only small decreases in blood pressure: no dose was held due to hypotension. Thus, a single daily administration of guanfacine at bedtime improved sleep and mood during cannabis withdrawal relative to placebo. This positive signal supports further studies varying the guanfacine dose, formulation or frequency of administration, or combining it with other medications to increase the likelihood of having an impact on cannabis use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Haney
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Medical Center New York NY USA
| | - Ziva D. Cooper
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Medical Center New York NY USA
| | - Gillinder Bedi
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Medical Center New York NY USA
| | - Evan Herrmann
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Medical Center New York NY USA
| | - Sandra D. Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Medical Center New York NY USA
| | - Stephanie Collins Reed
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Medical Center New York NY USA
| | - Richard W. Foltin
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Medical Center New York NY USA
| | - Frances R. Levin
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Medical Center New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, cannabis use is prevalent and widespread. There are currently no pharmacotherapies approved for treatment of cannabis use disorders.This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in the Cochrane Library in Issue 12, 2014. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapies as compared with each other, placebo or no pharmacotherapy (supportive care) for reducing symptoms of cannabis withdrawal and promoting cessation or reduction of cannabis use. SEARCH METHODS We updated our searches of the following databases to March 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs involving the use of medications to treat cannabis withdrawal or to promote cessation or reduction of cannabis use, or both, in comparison with other medications, placebo or no medication (supportive care) in people diagnosed as cannabis dependent or who were likely to be dependent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We included 21 RCTs involving 1755 participants: 18 studies recruited adults (mean age 22 to 41 years); three studies targeted young people (mean age 20 years). Most (75%) participants were male. The studies were at low risk of performance, detection and selective outcome reporting bias. One study was at risk of selection bias, and three studies were at risk of attrition bias.All studies involved comparison of active medication and placebo. The medications were diverse, as were the outcomes reported, which limited the extent of analysis.Abstinence at end of treatment was no more likely with Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) preparations than with placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.52; 305 participants; 3 studies; moderate-quality evidence). For selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants, mixed action antidepressants, anticonvulsants and mood stabilisers, buspirone and N-acetylcysteine, there was no difference in the likelihood of abstinence at end of treatment compared to placebo (low- to very low-quality evidence).There was qualitative evidence of reduced intensity of withdrawal symptoms with THC preparations compared to placebo. For other pharmacotherapies, this outcome was either not examined, or no significant differences was reported.Adverse effects were no more likely with THC preparations (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.17; 318 participants; 3 studies) or N-acetylcysteine (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.23; 418 participants; 2 studies) compared to placebo (moderate-quality evidence). For SSRI antidepressants, mixed action antidepressants, buspirone and N-acetylcysteine, there was no difference in adverse effects compared to placebo (low- to very low-quality evidence).There was no difference in the likelihood of withdrawal from treatment due to adverse effects with THC preparations, SSRIs antidepressants, mixed action antidepressants, anticonvulsants and mood stabilisers, buspirone and N-acetylcysteine compared to placebo (low- to very low-quality evidence).There was no difference in the likelihood of treatment completion with THC preparations, SSRI antidepressants, mixed action antidepressants and buspirone compared to placebo (low- to very low-quality evidence) or with N-acetylcysteine compared to placebo (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.21; 418 participants; 2 studies; moderate-quality evidence). Anticonvulsants and mood stabilisers appeared to reduce the likelihood of treatment completion (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.92; 141 participants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence).Available evidence on gabapentin (anticonvulsant), oxytocin (neuropeptide) and atomoxetine was insufficient for estimates of effectiveness. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is incomplete evidence for all of the pharmacotherapies investigated, and for many outcomes the quality of the evidence was low or very low. Findings indicate that SSRI antidepressants, mixed action antidepressants, bupropion, buspirone and atomoxetine are probably of little value in the treatment of cannabis dependence. Given the limited evidence of efficacy, THC preparations should be considered still experimental, with some positive effects on withdrawal symptoms and craving. The evidence base for the anticonvulsant gabapentin, oxytocin, and N-acetylcysteine is weak, but these medications are also worth further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Nielsen
- Monash UniversityMonash Addiction Research CentrePeninsula CampusMcMahons RoadFrankstonVICAustralia3199
| | - Linda Gowing
- University of AdelaideDiscipline of PharmacologyFrome RoadAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia5005
| | - Pamela Sabioni
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of TorontoTranslational Addiction Research Laboratory33 Russell StreetTorontoONCanada
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of TorontoTranslational Addiction Research Laboratory33 Russell StreetTorontoONCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee DC, Schlienz NJ, Peters EN, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Strain EC, Vandrey R. Systematic review of outcome domains and measures used in psychosocial and pharmacological treatment trials for cannabis use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 194:500-517. [PMID: 30530238 PMCID: PMC7038155 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is prevalent and demand for treatment is increasing, yet few individuals engage in formal treatment and the efficacy of established interventions for CUD is modest. Existing clinical trials evaluating psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for CUD have incorporated a wide variety of measures for assessing cannabis use outcomes, including abstinence, self-reported frequency and quantity used, withdrawal, use/dependence severity, and other psychosocial outcomes. The heterogeneity of measures and outcomes has limited quantitative analyses of the comparative effectiveness of existing interventions. The purpose of this systematic review is to: 1) identify and characterize approaches for measuring cannabis use in existing CUD intervention trials, including abstinence, frequency and quantity of use, and 2) summarize measures used to assess treatment efficacy in other outcome domains (e.g., cannabis use severity, psychosocial functioning, cannabis withdrawal), and provide a platform for future research to evaluate which outcome measures are most likely to reflect treatment efficacy and clinically significant improvement in other outcome domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin C Lee
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Nicolas J Schlienz
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erica N Peters
- Battelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle Memorial Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert H Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Dennis C Turk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eric C Strain
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ryan Vandrey
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mouhamed Y, Vishnyakov A, Qorri B, Sambi M, Frank SMS, Nowierski C, Lamba A, Bhatti U, Szewczuk MR. Therapeutic potential of medicinal marijuana: an educational primer for health care professionals. Drug Healthc Patient Saf 2018; 10:45-66. [PMID: 29928146 PMCID: PMC6001746 DOI: 10.2147/dhps.s158592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
With the proposed Canadian July 2018 legalization of marijuana through the Cannabis Act, a thorough critical analysis of the current trials on the efficacy of medicinal marijuana (MM) as a treatment option is necessary. This review is particularly important for primary care physicians whose patients may be interested in using MM as an alternative therapy. In response to increased interest in MM, Health Canada released a document in 2013 for general practitioners (GPs) as an educational tool on the efficacy of MM in treating some chronic and acute conditions. Although additional studies have filled in some of the gaps since the release of the Health Canada document, conflicting and inconclusive results continue to pose a challenge for physicians. This review aims to supplement the Health Canada document by providing physicians with a critical yet concise update on the recent advancements made regarding the efficacy of MM as a potential therapeutic option. An update to the literature of 2013 is important given the upcoming changes in legislation on the use of marijuana. Also, we briefly highlight the current recommendations provided by Canadian medical colleges on the parameters that need to be considered prior to authorizing MM use, routes of administration as well as a general overview of the endocannabinoid system as it pertains to cannabis. Lastly, we outline the appropriate medical conditions for which the authorization of MM may present as a practical alternative option in improving patient outcomes as well as individual considerations of which GPs should be mindful. The purpose of this paper is to offer physicians an educational tool that provides a necessary, evidence-based analysis of the therapeutic potential of MM and to ensure physicians are making decisions on the therapeutic use of MM in good faith.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Mouhamed
- Graduate Diploma & Professional Master in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Andrey Vishnyakov
- Graduate Diploma & Professional Master in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Bessi Qorri
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Manpreet Sambi
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - SM Signy Frank
- Graduate Diploma & Professional Master in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Catherine Nowierski
- Graduate Diploma & Professional Master in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Anmol Lamba
- Graduate Diploma & Professional Master in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Umrao Bhatti
- Graduate Diploma & Professional Master in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Myron R Szewczuk
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baker NL, Gray KM, Sherman BJ, Morella K, Sahlem GL, Wagner AM, McRae-Clark AL. Biological correlates of self-reported new and continued abstinence in cannabis cessation treatment clinical trials. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018; 187:270-277. [PMID: 29698894 PMCID: PMC5959795 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The agreement between self-reported cannabis abstinence with urine cannabinoid concentrations in a clinical trials setting is not well characterized. We assessed the agreement between various cannabinoid cutoffs and self-reported abstinence across three clinical trials, one including contingency management for abstinence. METHODS Three cannabis cessation clinical trials where participants reported use and provided weekly urine samples for cannabis and creatinine concentration measurements were included. Bootstrapped data were assessed for agreement between self-reported 7+ day abstinence and urine cannabinoid tests using generalized linear mixed effects models for clustered binary outcomes. One study implemented contingency management for cannabis abstinence. Four hundred and seventy-three participants with 3787 valid urine specimens were included. Urine was analyzed for 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and creatinine using immunoassay methods Biological cutoffs of 50, 100, and 200 ng/ml, as well as changes in CN normalized THCCOOH (25%/50% decrease), were assessed for agreement with self-reported abstinence during the three clinical trials. RESULTS Agreement between measured THCCOOH and self-reported abstinence increases with increasing cutoff concentrations, while the agreement with self-reported non-abstinence decreases with increasing cutoff concentrations. Combining THCCOOH cutoffs with recent changes in CN-THCCOOH provides a better agreement in those self-reporting abstinence. Participants in the studies that received CM for abstinence had a lower agreement between self-reported abstinence and returned to use than those in studies that did not have a contingency management component. CONCLUSION Using combinations of biological measurements and self-reported abstinence, confirmation of study related abstinence may be verifiable earlier and with greater accuracy than relying on a single measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel L. Baker
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 303, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Kevin M. Gray
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Brian J. Sherman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Kristen Morella
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon Street, Suite 303, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Gregory L. Sahlem
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Amanda M. Wagner
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Aimee L. McRae-Clark
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cooper ZD, Craft RM. Sex-Dependent Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: A Translational Perspective. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018; 43:34-51. [PMID: 28811670 PMCID: PMC5719093 DOI: 10.1038/npp.2017.140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 206] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Recent policy changes have led to significant increases in the use of cannabis for both medical and recreational purposes. Although men are more likely to endorse past month cannabis use and are more frequently diagnosed with Cannabis Use Disorder relative to women, a growing proportion of medical cannabis users are reported to be women. The increased popularity of cannabis for medical purposes and the narrowing gap in prevalence of use between men and women raises questions regarding sex-dependent effects related to therapeutic efficacy and negative health effects of cannabis and cannabinoids. The objective of this review is to provide a translational perspective on the sex-dependent effects of cannabis and cannabinoids by synthesizing findings from preclinical and clinical studies focused on sex comparisons of their therapeutic potential and abuse liability, two specific areas that are of significant public health relevance. Hormonal and pharmacological mechanisms that may underlie sex differences in the effects of cannabis and cannabinoids are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziva D Cooper
- Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca M Craft
- Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Current State of Pharmacological Treatments for Cannabis Use Disorder and Withdrawal. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018; 43:173-194. [PMID: 28875989 PMCID: PMC5719115 DOI: 10.1038/npp.2017.212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) commonly occurs and carries a notable economic and functional burden at both individual and societal levels. While there are no clearly efficacious medication treatments for CUD, 20 years of committed and high-quality research in the human laboratory and clinical settings have resulted in medications with demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of cannabis withdrawal, the ability to reduce cannabis use, and results that point to promising future work. The current state of pharmacology research for CUD highlights the need to consider particular characteristics of patients, such as gender, impulsivity, and severity of cannabis use, when selecting a medication in the off-label treatment of CUD or cannabis withdrawal. As a field, the body of work also exposes some areas in need of improvement in study design, selection of outcome measures, interpretation of results, and the overall process of evaluating candidate medications. Coming to a consensus as a field and addressing these gaps in future research will likely lend itself to further advances in improving the lives of patients with CUD.
Collapse
|
22
|
Hill KP, Palastro MD, Gruber SA, Fitzmaurice GM, Greenfield SF, Lukas SE, Weiss RD. Nabilone pharmacotherapy for cannabis dependence: A randomized, controlled pilot study. Am J Addict 2017; 26:795-801. [PMID: 28921814 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We assessed the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of nabilone, a cannabinoid agonist, to treat cannabis dependence. METHODS Eighteen adults with DSM-IV cannabis dependence were randomized to receive either 2 mg/day of nabilone (n = 10) or placebo (n = 8) for 10 weeks in addition to medication management. Twelve participants, six in each group, completed treatment. The safety and tolerability of nabilone was assessed at each visit. Any side effects from nabilone or the placebo were documented. Cannabis use outcomes were assessed via self-report of days of use and twice-weekly urine cannabinoid tests; secondary outcomes included cannabis craving and anxiety. RESULTS We assessed safety and tolerability at each study visit. A total of eight adverse events, all mild or moderate, were reported in two participants in the nabilone group, and six events were reported in four participants in the placebo group during study treatment. A total of eight adverse events were reported in two participants in the nabilone group and six events were reported in four participants in the placebo group during study treatment. All reported adverse events were rated mild-to-moderate. There were no side effects deemed serious enough to be classified as an FDA-defined serious adverse event. In general, participants in both groups reported reduced cannabis use according to self-report over the course of the study, although these reductions were not statistically discernible. Moreover, there was no difference in cannabis use between the nabilone group and the placebo group as measured by self-report. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Nabilone pharmacotherapy was safe and well-tolerated in participants with cannabis dependence. Future studies might evaluate a higher dose of nabilone to determine its effects on cannabis use outcomes in participants with cannabis dependence. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE There remains a clear need for additional pharmacotherapy trials for cannabis dependence, and nabilone remains a candidate for such trials. (Am J Addict 2017;26:795-801).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin P Hill
- Division of Addiction Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts
| | | | - Staci A Gruber
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts
| | - Garrett M Fitzmaurice
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts
| | - Shelly F Greenfield
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts
| | - Scott E Lukas
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts
| | - Roger D Weiss
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Copeland J, Pokorski I. Progress toward pharmacotherapies for cannabis-use disorder: an evidence-based review. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2016; 7:41-53. [PMID: 27217809 PMCID: PMC4862355 DOI: 10.2147/sar.s89857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cannabis is the most widely used and variably regulated drug in the world, with increasing trends of use being reported in the US, Australia, Asia, and Africa. Evidence has shown a decrease in the age of commencement of cannabis use in some developed countries and a prolongation of risk of initiation to cannabis use beyond adolescence among more recent users. Cannabis use is associated with numerous health risks and long-term morbidity, as well as risk of developing cannabis-use disorders. Cannabis users infrequently seek professional treatment, and normally do so after a decade of use. Cannabis-use disorders are currently treated using a selection of psychosocial interventions. Severity of withdrawal is a factor that increases the risk of relapse, and is the target of pharmacotherapy studies. Currently, there is no approved pharmacotherapy for cannabis-use disorders. A number of approaches have been examined, and trials are continuing to find a safe and effective medication with little abuse liability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Copeland
- UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Izabella Pokorski
- UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|