Solid organ transplantation from hepatitis B virus-positive donors: consensus guidelines for recipient management

Vaccines and Vaccine Response in the Small Bowel Transplant Patient

Vaccines should be regularly administered and their efficiency controlled, before and after intestinal transplantation. The household and health care providers should also be immunized, to further prevent transmission. Universal vaccination providing " herd immunity" should be enforced. Recommendations are given about timing, indications, and contraindications of each individual vaccine, before and after transplantation.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

The Spread Pattern of New Practice in Liver Transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Introducing new liver transplantation (LT) practices, like unconventional donor use, incurs higher costs, making evaluation of their prognostic justification crucial. This study reexamines the spread pattern of new LT practices and its prognosis across the United States.

METHODS

The study investigated the spread pattern of new practices using the UNOS database (2014-2023). Practices included LT for hepatitis B/C (HBV/HCV) nonviremic recipients with viremic donors, LT for COVID-19-positive recipients, and LT using onsite machine perfusion (OMP). One year post-LT patient and graft survival were also evaluated.

RESULTS

LTs using HBV/HCV donors were common in the East, while LTs for COVID-19 recipients and those using OMP started predominantly in California, Arizona, Texas, and the Northeast. K-means cluster analysis identified three adoption groups: facilities with rapid, slow, and minimal adoption rates. Rapid adoption occurred mainly in high-volume centers, followed by a gradual increase in middle-volume centers, with little increase in low-volume centers. The current spread patterns did not significantly affect patient survival. Specifically, for LTs with HCV donors or COVID-19 recipients, patient and graft survivals in the rapid-increasing group was comparable to others. In LTs involving OMP, the rapid- or slow-increasing groups tended to have better patient survival (p = 0.05) and significantly improved graft survival rates (p = 0.02). Facilities adopting new practices often overlap across different practices.

DISCUSSION

Our analysis revealed three distinct adoption groups across all practices, correlating the adoption aggressiveness with LT volume in centers. Aggressive adoption of new practices did not compromise patient and graft survivals, supporting the current strategy. Understanding historical trends could predict the rise in future LT cases with new practices, aiding in resource distribution.

Utilization of Hepatitis B viremic donors (NAT+) leads to improved kidney transplant access for older adult recipients with little to no wait time

BACKGROUND

Though the use of Hepatitis B viremic (HBV) donor kidneys may be a safe alternative to improve access to transplantation, there has not been wide acceptance of this practice. In this study, we determined the safety and effectiveness of HBV NAT (+) donor kidneys in a protocolized manner in an older adult population.

METHODS

Over a 3-year period, 16 decreased donor kidney transplants were performed with HBV NAT+ kidneys. Recipients of HBV NAT+ kidneys were treated with entecavir started pre-operatively and continued for 52 weeks.

RESULTS

HBV NAT+ kidneys were preferentially used in older (68 ± 5 vs. 64 ± 9 years; p = .01) recipients with less dialysis time (93.8% < 5 years vs. 67% <5 years; p = .03). In this cohort, 3/16 had detectable HBV PCR 1-week post-transplant, but all were negative at 9- and 12-months. Calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was slightly decreased 12-months post-transplant. Post-transplant outcomes in an age-matched cohort showed no difference in rates of delayed graft function, readmission within 30 days, and graft loss or death within 6 months of transplant (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

Transplants with HBV NAT+ donor kidneys in a pre-emptive treatment protocol allow for increased safe access to transplantation in older adult recipients with little or no dialysis time.

An Anatomically Complicated Living Donor Kidney Transplantation from Hepatitis B Surface Antigen-Positive Donor to Negative Recipient With Size Discrepancy

The deficiency of organ donors remains a barrier to kidney transplantation. Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) can overcome graft shortage, resulting in better outcomes. Many efforts are being made to expand the donor pool, such as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donors to negative recipients and anatomically complicated donor kidneys with size discrepancies. We report a case in which we overcame various problems in LDKT. The recipient was a 56-year-old, 106-kg, HBsAg negative male with diabetic nephropathy. The donor was a 63-year-old female, 56-kg, hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier with dual renal arteries. Preoperative antiviral medication was provided to the donor for negative conversion of HBV-DNA. The recipient was given HBV vaccination (antihepatitis B antibody: 2.25-36.16 mIU/mL). Anti-HBV immunoglobulin was intraoperatively administered to prevent transmission. The donor and recipient had an absolute weight difference (50 kg). In addition, the donor's kidney had a main and an accessory artery in the upper pole, which were anastomosed to the recipient's right external iliac and inferior epigastric artery, respectively. Follow-up serum creatinine levels decreased. Doppler ultrasonography showed good vascular flow within the reference range of the resistive index. The recipient's follow-up HBV-DNA titer was negative with antiviral medication. We successfully performed LDKT from an HBV-positive donor to a negative recipient by perioperative antiviral treatment and overcame a significant size discrepancy and anatomic challenges by preserving even a small portion of the kidney graft.

Use and Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-positive Grafts for Kidney or Heart Transplantation in the United States From 1999 to 2021

BACKGROUND

The gap between demand and supply for solid organ transplants requires strategies to expand the donor pool. Successful use of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive grafts has been reported in liver transplantation.

METHODS

In this United Network for Organ Sharing database (January 1999 to June 2021) retrospective cohort study, outcomes of kidney transplant (KT) or heart transplant (HT) recipients with HBV donor grafts (hepatitis B surface antigen and/or for HBV nucleic acid test-positive) were examined. Propensity score matching was performed for HBV-positive to negative graft recipients (1:5 for renal transplantation and 1:10 for HT).

RESULTS

Of 448 HBV-positive donors with 896 kidneys, 352 kidneys (39.3%) and 56 hearts (12.5%) were transplanted. Of these, 312 kidneys (88.6%) and 45 hearts (80.3%) were transplanted in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative recipients. Ten-year graft survival was 47.1% and 49% (log-rank P = 0.353), and patient survival was 58% and 59% ( P = 0.999) for KT recipients. Similar figures among HT recipients were 41.9% and 38.9% for graft survival ( P = 0.471), and 54.3% and 61.2% for patient survival ( P = 0.277). Subgroup analyses in recipients with HBV nucleic acid test-positive grafts irrespective of antibodies to HBV core antigen-positive status, and recipients negative for anti-HBs (548 renal transplantation and 209 HT) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we are limited by lack of available data on posttransplant anti-HBV treatment, the study observations suggest that using HBV-positive grafts is a reasonable strategy to expand the donor pool among candidates waiting for KT or HT.

Donor Viral Hepatitis and Liver Transplantation

Despite increasing numbers of organ transplants completed each year, there continues to be an organ shortage in liver transplantation. This has led to the utilization of previously discarded or "marginal" allografts, such as those from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV). The advent of direct acting antivirals and nucleos(t)ide analogs has allowed these allografts to be safely transplanted regardless of the recipients' hepatitis status with comparable graft and patient survival. Recent advances have even allowed usage of actively viremic donors with similar graft and patient outcomes. This article presents an overview of the use of HCV positive and HBV positive allografts.

Kidney Transplantation From Brain-Dead Donors With Hepatitis B or C in South Korea: A 2015 to 2020 Korean Organ Transplantation Registry Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

According to the current Center for Korean Network for Organ Sharing guidelines for kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors with hepatitis B or C infection, organs from hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HbsAg+) or anti-hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) donors can only be transplanted into HBsAg+ or anti-HCV+ recipients. We aimed to confirm the status and the outcomes of kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors with hepatitis B or C virus in Korea.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all kidney transplantations from brain-dead donors in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry database between January 2015 and June 2020, divided into 3 groups according to donor hepatitis status. Finally, kidney transplantations from 80 HBV+, 12 HCV+, and 2013 HBV-/HCV- donors were included.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed in the recipient characteristics and the transplant outcomes except the waiting time (HBV+ to HBV-/HCV-, P < .001; HCV+ to HBV-/HCV-, P = .10; HBV+ to HCV+P = .95). Five-year graft survival rates of the HBV+, HCV+, and HBV-/HCV- recipients were 95%, 83%, and 85%, respectively (HBV+ to HCV+, P = .22; HCV+ to HBV-/HCV-, P = .81; HBV+ to HBV-/HCV-, P = .02). Five-year patient survival rates of the HBV+, HCV+, and HBV-/HCV- recipients were 95%, 100%, and 76%, respectively (HBV+ to HCV+, P = .61; HCV+ to HBV-/HCV-, P = .13; HBV+ to HBV-/HCV-, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

HBV+/HCV+ brain-dead donor kidney transplantation outcomes were comparable to HBV-/HCV-. South Korea should consider conditionally permitting transplantation from HBV+ or HCV+ donors to HBV- or HCV- recipients to accumulate new data and conduct further studies.

Comparative Survival Analysis of Dialysis and Renal Transplantation in HBV-Infected End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

The potential risks and benefits of kidney transplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) have been a subject of debate. This study aimed to provide real-world data on the relative risks of death and clinical outcomes associated with kidney transplantation in this context.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database from 1997 to 2013, extracting cohorts of patients who are HBV-infected ESRD. The main outcome measure was overall survival, whereas the secondary measure was the relative risk of death and survival benefit through propensity-score matching (1:1).

RESULTS

Of the 4895 patients who are HBV-infected with ESRD, 172 renal transplant recipients were enrolled for analysis. There was a numeric trend towards higher overall survival rates in renal transplant recipients, although this was not statistically significant (P = .057). A significant survival benefit was observed in the renal transplant group if the follow-up was longer than one year (P = 0.007). The relative risks of death among renal transplant recipients were initially higher at 2.0 times that of patients on chronic dialysis, presenting in a hyperbolic pattern with equal risks at 462 days. The likelihood of survival became equal until 1649 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that kidney transplantation may be a viable option for patients who are HBV-infected with ESRD, given the significant improvement in quality of life and reduction of death risks observed four to five years after successful transplantation. This real-world data can help clinicians make informed decisions regarding the management of ESRD in patients who are HBV-infected.

Novel Assays to Solve the Clinical and Scientific Challenges of Chronic Hepatitis B

Chronic infection with Hepatitis B is a common, incurable, and deadly infection. Despite inexpensive laboratory tests for diagnosis and management that have been established for decades, the worldwide rate of diagnosis is only ∼10%, and ∼5% of people are under treatment. Novel assays have been developed to improve linkage to care by providing more flexible approaches to determine a patient's health status. Other assays have been established to better investigate intrahepatic host-virus interactions to support clinical trials for cure research. This review outlines the clinical and scientific challenges still to be solved and the upcoming methods used to address them.

Expanding the donor pool: Kidney transplantation from serum HBV DNA or HBeAg-positive donors to HBsAg-negative recipients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

HBsAg-positive (HBsAg[+]) donors are rarely accepted for kidney transplantation (KT), especially when the donor is also HBV DNA-positive (HBV DNA[+]) or HBeAg-positive (HBeAg[+]) serologically. This study aimed to report kidney transplant outcomes from HBsAg(+) donors to HBsAg(-) recipients.

METHODS

Consecutive cases were retrospectively identified from 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2020. KTs from HBsAg(-)/HBcAb-positive (HBcAb[+]) donors to HBcAb(-) recipients were selected as the control group. The primary outcomes were de novo HBV infection (DNH), graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

We identified 105 HBsAg(-) recipients who received HBsAg(+) kidneys and 516 HBcAb(-) recipients who received HBcAb(+) kidneys. A higher DNH rate was observed after receiving HBsAg(+) kidneys than after receiving HBcAb(+) kidneys after a median follow-up of 23.0 months (4/105[3.8%] vs. 2/516[0.4%], p = .009). All four infected recipients receiving HBsAg(+) kidneys had HBsAg clearance after treatment. Graft and patient survival were comparable between the groups (p = .630, p = .910). The DNH rates were 0/22(0%), 3/70(4.3%) and 1/13(7.7%) after receiving HBsAg(+), HBV DNA(+) and HBeAg(+) kidneys, respectively (p = .455). The DNH rate was lower if the donor had received antiviral treatment (4/42[9.5%] vs. 0/63[0%], p = .023). HBsAb(-) recipients had a higher DNH incidence than HBsAb(+) recipients (3/25[12.0%] vs. 1/80[1.3%], p = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of HBsAg(+) donors contributed to comparable graft and patient survival, but HBV DNA(+) or HBeAg(+) donors and HBsAb(-) recipients maybe associated with a higher risk of HBV infection. These findings help expand the donor pool and emphasize the role of donor antiviral treatment and recipient HBV immunity in establishing optimal prophylactic regimens.

A quick algorithmic review on management of viral infectious diseases in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients

Pediatric solid organ transplant is a life-saving procedure for children with end-stage organ failure. Viral infections are a common complication following pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT), which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Pediatric solid organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk of viral infections due to their immunosuppressed state. The most commonly encountered viruses include cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), adenoviruses, and BK polyomavirus. Prevention strategies include vaccination prior to transplantation, post-transplant prophylaxis with antiviral agents, and preemptive therapy. Treatment options vary depending on the virus and may include antiviral therapy and sometimes immunosuppression modification. This review provides a Quick Algorithmic overview of prevention and treatment strategies for viral infectious diseases in pediatric solid organ transplant recipient.

Lifetime Risk of Hepatorenal Events Assessed in Longitudinal Cohort of Renal Transplant Recipients with HBV Infection

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is a treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, the impact of nucleos(t)ide analogues usage on the clinical outcomes in HBV-infected ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplantation is not well understood. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with HBV infection using real-world data to provide insight into the disease course over time.

METHODS

A nationwide retrospective longitudinal population-level cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database. The study evaluated patient and allograft survival and kidney-related and liver-related events and identified factors contributing to these events.

RESULTS

Of the 4838 renal transplant recipients in the study, there were no significant differences in graft survival between the HBV-infected and non-infected groups (P = .244). However, the HBV-infected group had suboptimal patient survival compared to the non-infected group (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival, 1.80; 95% CI 1.40-2.30; P < .001). Diabetes mellitus was associated with a higher re-dialysis rate (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.38-2.12; P < .001) regarding kidney-associated events. For liver-associated events, HBV-infected status (HR, 9.40; 95% CI, 5.66-15.63; P < .001), and age >60 years (HR, 6.90; 95% CI, 3.14-15.19; P < .001) were associated with increased incidence of liver cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis B-infected renal transplant recipients have comparable graft survival but inferior patient survival outcomes due to pre-existing diseases and increasing liver-related complications. The findings of this study can help optimize treatment strategies and improve long-term outcomes for this patient population.

South Asian Transplant Infectious Disease Guidelines for Solid Organ Transplant Candidates, Recipients, and Donors

These guidelines discuss the epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, posttransplant prophylaxis, monitoring, and management of endemic infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates, recipients, and donors in South Asia. The guidelines also provide recommendations for SOT recipients traveling to this region. These guidelines are based on literature review and expert opinion by transplant physicians, surgeons, and infectious diseases specialists, mostly from South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka) as well as transplant experts from other countries. These guidelines cover relevant endemic bacterial infections (tuberculosis, leptospirosis, melioidosis, typhoid, scrub typhus), viral infections (hepatitis A, B, C, D, and E; rabies; and the arboviruses including dengue, chikungunya, Zika, Japanese encephalitis), endemic fungal infections (mucormycosis, histoplasmosis, talaromycosis, sporotrichosis), and endemic parasitic infections (malaria, leishmaniasis, toxoplasmosis, cryptosporidiosis, strongyloidiasis, and filariasis) as well as travelers' diarrhea and vaccination for SOT candidates and recipients including travelers visiting this region. These guidelines are intended to be an overview of each topic; more detailed reviews are being published as a special supplement in the Indian Journal of Transplantation .

Age-related decline in anti-HBV antibodies in vaccinated kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is indicated for all end stage kidney disease patients, including all solid organ transplant candidates. Maintenance of adequate immunity is especially important for immunosuppressed solid organ recipients who are at increased risk for donor or community acquired HBV. The impact of age and immunosuppression on long-term maintenance of HBV immunity postvaccination has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of 96 kidney transplant recipients, transplanted between July 2012 and December 2020, who had Hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) levels measured pretransplantation and 1-year posttransplantation. We compared the change in HBsAb levels stratified by patient's age (<45, 45-60, and >60) and by whether or not the patient received lymphocyte depleting induction therapy.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrate that HBsAb IgG levels vary by age group, decreased significantly at 1-year posttransplant (p < .0001) and were significantly lower in the older cohort (p = .03). Among recipients who received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction (rATG), the log HbsAb levels were significantly lower in the older age group (2.15 in age <45, 1.75 in age 45-60 and 1.47 in age >60, p = .01). Age group (p = .004), recipient HBcAb status (p = .002), and rATG (p = .048) were independently associated with >20% reduction in log HBsAb levels posttransplant.

CONCLUSION

Significant declines in HBsAb levels occur postkidney transplantation, especially in older individuals, thus placing exposed older kidney transplant recipients at greater risk of HBV infection and associated complications.

Transplanting hepatitis B surface antigen-positive livers in the United States: Outcomes and opportunities

Livers from donors with positive hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAg+) have been used to expand the donor pool; however, outcome data are limited. We aim to evaluate survival following liver transplant (LT) from HBsAg+ donors. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, we identified HBsAg+ donors used for LT from 2009 to 2020. We used Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression to compare post-LT survival in hepatitis B virus-negative recipients who utilized HBsAg+ donors to propensity-matched cohorts who utilized other types of donors. From 2009-2020, 70 patients received HBsAg+ livers, and 58 of them did not carry a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus. The 1- and 3-year post-LT survival for hepatitis B virus-negative patients who received livers from HBsAg+ donors were 96.6% and 91.4%, respectively, with no statistical differences compared with patients who received livers from hepatitis C virus viremic donors (96.5%/93.0%, P = .961/.427), donation after cardiac death donors (93.0%/86.0%, P = .651/.598), average-risk donors (89.5%/86.0%, P = 0.264/0.617), and a combination of extended-criteria donors, including donation after cardiac death, donor age over 70, and graft with greater than 30% steatosis (93.0%/91.2%, P = .621/.785). Recipients of HBsAg+ livers have similar post-LT survival compared with those receiving other types of grafts. Increasing the utilization of HBsAg+ livers could safely expand the donor pool.

Hepatitis B prophylaxis among recipients of a hepatitis B core antibody positive liver transplant

OBJECTIVE

Using organs from donors with a history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has expanded the pool for solid organ transplant. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of HBV postexposure prophylaxis among recipients of a hepatitis B core antibody positive (HBcAb+) liver transplant and compare post-transplant outcomes with those who received a hepatitis B core antibody negative (HBcAb-) liver transplant.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center cohort analysis of liver transplant recipients at our institution. All adult liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2014, and August 30, 2020, were reviewed for inclusion. Recipients of an HBcAb+ organ who were administered antiviral therapy were matched 1:2 with recipients of an HBcAb- organ using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was breakthrough HBV infection. Secondary outcomes included graft survival, patient survival, and allograft rejection. Postexposure prophylaxis strategies for HBV were also assessed. Outcomes were analyzed for the first 12 months after transplant.

RESULTS

Twenty-four HBcAb+ patients were matched to 48 HBcAb- patients. There were no documented cases of breakthrough HBV infection. Patient and graft survival was similar between both groups. Seven HBcAb+ patients (29%) experienced an episode of rejection within the first year compared with zero HBcAb- patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study suggest that current strategies for HBV postexposure prophylaxis are effective. Patient and graft survival rates at 30 days after transplant were similar to institutional reported values. Rejection was more prominent in the HBcAb+ group.

Management of Hepatitis C Virus and Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the Setting of Kidney Disease

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection poses unique challenges in patients with kidney disease. Direct-acting antivirals have been a major breakthrough in eradicating HCV infection, and several pangenotypic regimens are available for patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis with high cure rates and no need for dose adjustment. Direct-acting antiviral therapy alone can treat HCV-associated cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis; concurrent antiviral and immunosuppressive therapy is needed for cases of severe, organ-threatening manifestations of cryoglobulinemia. Immunosuppression may be needed for HBV-associated kidney disease (polyarteritis nodosa or membranous nephropathy) when there is evidence of severe immune-mediated injury while weighing the risk of potential viral activation. Most HBV antiviral agents need to be dose-adjusted in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis, and drug-drug interactions need to be carefully evaluated in patients with kidney transplants. Considerations for accepting HCV- and HBV-infected donors for kidney transplantation are discussed.

Vaccination with HepB-CpG vaccine in individuals undergoing immune suppressive drug therapy

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressed patients are a targeted group for HBV vaccination but suboptimal antibody responses occur when traditional recombinant vaccines are used.

METHODS

We tested an FDA approved immune adjuvanted HBV vaccine (HEPLISAV--B® or HepB-CpG) in medically immune suppressed individuals. HepB-CpG was given to 10 patients taking biologic agents or anti-rejection therapy. Each received vaccine at time 0 and week 4 with a third dose at week 12 if anti-HBs remained less than 10 mIU/mL.

RESULTS

Seroprotective anti-HBs developed in 70 % of participants by week 24. Those taking biologic agents responded more rapidly and a third dose was generally needed in those transplanted. By week 24, most taking biologics but only 2 of 6 on anti-rejection treatment had antibody levels exceeding 100 mIU/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Seroprotective anti-HBs developed in 70 % with HepB-CpG. Antibody responses were more rapid in those taking biologic agents but a third dose improved antibody responses in transplanted participants.

Maximize Donor Cornea Use in a Hepatitis B Endemic Area via Serology Matching

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the rationality of the allocation guidelines in a hepatitis B endemic area that uses corneas from hepatitis B donors.

METHODS

Under Taiwan's current guidelines, corneas donated from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)(+) donors can be allocated to HBsAg(+) or hepatitis B surface antibody recipients. From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, corneas donated to National Taiwan University Hospital were divided into HBsAg(+), HBsAg(-)/hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)(+), and HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(-) groups. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA extracted from corneoscleral rims was quantified by polymerase chain reaction and correlated with donor serum HBsAg, anti-HBc, and HBV DNA. Recipients of HBV DNA(+) grafts were called back for serology and serum HBV DNA tests.

RESULTS

The corneoscleral HBV DNA of 170 corneas (113 donors) was quantified, of which 45 corneas were from 28 HBsAg(+) donors, 87 were from 57 HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) donors, and 38 were from 28 HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(-) donors, and HBV DNA was detected in 80.0%, 9.2%, and 0% of the corneoscleral rims in each group. Donor anti-HBc(+) provided the highest sensitivity (1.00) and negative predictive value (1.00) for corneoscleral HBV DNA. Twenty-eight of 40 recipients (70%) using HBV DNA(+) grafts were called back, and none developed hepatitis in follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 55.5 mo.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor anti-HBc should be tested routinely with HBsAg. Allocating corneas from HBsAg(+) or anti-HBc(+) donors to HBsAg(+) or hepatitis B surface antibody recipients maximizes cornea usage from hepatitis B donors without compromising transplant safety in a hepatitis B endemic setting.

Incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of HBV reactivation in non-liver solid organ transplant recipients with resolved HBV infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines do not recommend routine antiviral prophylaxis to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in non-liver solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with resolved HBV infection, even in anti-hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs)-negative recipients and those receiving intense immunosuppression. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of HBV reactivation in non-liver SOT recipients.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched up to December 31, 2022. Clinical studies reporting HBV reactivation in non-liver SOT recipients were included. Case reports, case series, and cohort studies with a sample size of less than 10 patients were excluded. Random-effects analysis was used for all meta-analyses. We included 2,913 non-liver SOT recipients with resolved HBV infection from 16 retrospective cohort studies in the analysis. The overall HBV reactivation rate was 2.5% (76/2,913; 95% confidence interval [95% CI 1.6%, 3.6%]; I2 = 55.0%). Higher rates of reactivation were observed in recipients with negative anti-HBs (34/421; 7.8%; 95% CI [5.2%, 10.9%]; I2 = 36.0%) by pooling 6 studies, experiencing acute rejection (13/266; 5.8%; 95% CI [2.3%, 14.5%]; I2 = 63.2%) by pooling 3 studies, receiving ABO blood type-incompatible transplantation (8/111; 7.0%; 95% CI [2.9%, 12.7%]; I2 = 0%) by pooling 3 studies, receiving rituximab (10/133; 7.3%; 95% CI [3.4%, 12.6%]; I2 = 0%) by pooling 3 studies, and receiving anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG, 25/504; 4.9%; 95% CI [2.5%, 8.1%]; I2 = 49.0%) by pooling 4 studies. Among recipients with post-transplant HBV reactivation, 11.0% (7/52; 95% CI [4.0%, 20.8%]; I2 = 0.3%) developed HBV-related hepatic failure, and 11.0% (7/52; 95% CI [4.0%, 20.8%]; I2 = 0.3%) had HBV-related death. Negative anti-HBs (crude odds ratio [OR] 5.05; 95% CI [2.83, 9.00]; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), ABO blood type-incompatible transplantation (crude OR 2.62; 95% CI [1.05, 6.04]; p = 0.040; I2 = 0%), history of acute rejection (crude OR 2.37; 95% CI [1.13, 4.97]; p = 0.022; I2 = 0%), ATG use (crude OR 3.19; 95% CI [1.48, 6.87]; p = 0.003; I2 = 0%), and rituximab use (crude OR 3.16; 95% CI [1.24, 8.06]; p = 0.016; I2 = 0%) increased the risk of reactivation. Adjusted analyses reported similar results. Limitations include moderate heterogeneity in the meta-analyses and that most studies were conducted in kidney transplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-liver SOT recipients with resolved HBV infection have a high risk of HBV-related hepatic failure and HBV-related death if HBV reactivation occurs. Potential risk factors for HBV reactivation include rituximab use, anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin use, anti-HBs negative status, acute rejection history, and ABO blood type-incompatible transplantation. Further research on monitoring and routine antiviral prophylaxis of non-liver SOT recipients at higher risk of HBV reactivation is required.

The impact of long-term exposure to tacrolimus on chronic kidney disease after lung transplantation: A retrospective analysis from a single transplantation center

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive and irreversible complication in lung transplant patients who have received long-term treatment with tacrolimus. This study aimed to verify long-term tacrolimus exposure values in CKD progression.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of adult lung transplant recipients performed at our center between 2012 and October 2015. Patients who completed the 5-year follow-up period were enrolled in this study. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m².

RESULTS

Eighty patients were analyzed. Compared with baseline (109 ± 38.1 mL/min/1.73 m2), the average eGFR values of our patients gradually decreased during the fifth-year post transplantation (46.5%, 58.3 ± 28.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), and the decline in eGFR values was particularly pronounced in the first year (31.2%, 74.6 ± 28.91 mL/min/1.73 m2). Moreover, 10 (12.7%), 21 (26.9%), 24 (31.2%), 28 (41.2%), and 48 (60%) patients had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² at 3, 6, 1, 3, and 5 years after lung transplantation (LT), respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between tacrolimus dose and eGFR 6 months after LT (P = 0.0414). We found no correlation between the serum tacrolimus concentration and CKD progression.

CONCLUSION

eGFR constantly decreased and the incidence of CKD increased during the 5-year follow-up period after LT. The tacrolimus dose had a significant negative correlation with eGFR at 6 months after LT. Meanwhile, whole-blood tacrolimus trough concentrations were not correlated with eGFR decline. When possible, lower dosing within 1 year after LT can reduce potential nephrotoxic side effects.

Hepatitis B in Heart Transplant Donors and Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Expanding the heart donor pool to include patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) could help ameliorate the organ shortage in heart transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the management and recipient outcomes of D+/R- and D-/R+ heart transplants.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies published on heart transplants involving HBV+ donors and/or HBV+ recipients. A comparison was performed between two groups where heart transplants were performed a) D+/R- (n = 98) versus b) D-/R+ (n = 65).

RESULTS

Overall, 13 studies were selected, comprising 163 patients. Mean patient age was 55 y (95% CI: 39, 78) and 79% (69, 86) were male. Active post-transplant HBV infection requiring antiviral treatment occurred in 11% (1, 69) of D+/R- recipients and 33% (9, 71) of D-/R+ recipients. Post-transplant antiviral therapy was given to 80% (6, 100) of D+/R- recipients compared to 72% (42, 90) of D-/R+ recipients (P = 0.84). Hepatitis-related mortality was observed in no D+/R- recipients and 7% (2, 27) of D-/R+ recipients. Survival 1-y post-transplant was comparable between both groups at 83% (83, 92) and 81% (61, 92) for D+/R- and D-/R+ transplants, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review found that HBV D+/R- heart transplantation was associated with fewer active hepatitis infections and lower hepatitis-related mortality than D-/R+ transplantation, with comparable survival at 1 y. Additional studies utilizing HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT) to compare outcomes with HBsAg+ and anti-HBc+ donors are crucial to reach more definitive conclusions about the risk of donor-derived infections in this context.

Evaluation of an Abnormal Liver Panel After Liver Transplantation

Abnormal liver tests are common after liver transplantation. The differential diagnosis depends on the clinical context, particularly the time course, pattern and degree of elevation, and donor and recipient factors. The perioperative period has distinct causes compared with months and years after transplant, including ischemia-reperfusion injury, vascular thrombosis, and primary graft nonfunction. Etiologies seen beyond the perioperative period include biliary complications, rejection, infection, recurrent disease, and non-transplant-specific causes. The evaluation begins with a liver ultrasound with Doppler as well as appropriate laboratory testing and culminates in a liver biopsy if the imaging and laboratory testing is unrevealing.

Hepatitis B Blood Donor Screening Data: An Under-Recognized Resource for Canadian Public Health Surveillance

Hepatitis B surveillance is essential to achieving Canada's goal of eliminating hepatitis B by 2030. Hepatitis B rates, association of infection with vaccine age-eligibility, and risk factors were analyzed among 1,401,603 first-time Canadian blood donors from 2005 to 2020. Donors were classified as having likely chronic or likely resolved/occult infections based on hepatitis B surface antigen, anti-hepatitis B core antigen, and hepatitis B nucleic acid test results. Likely chronically infected and control donors (ratio 1:4) participated in risk-factor interviews. The 2019 rate of likely chronic infection was 61.9 per 100,000 (95% CI 46.5-80.86) and 1449.5 per 100,000 for likely resolved/occult infections (95% CI 1370.7-1531.7). Likely chronic infections were higher in males (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.7-3.7) and the vaccine-ineligible birth cohort (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.6-2.2). The main risk factors were living with someone who had hepatitis (OR 12.5; 95% CI 5.2-30.0) and ethnic origin from a high-prevalence country (OR 8.4; 95% CI 5.9-11.9). Undiagnosed chronic hepatitis B may be more prevalent in Canada than currently determined by traditional passive hepatitis B reporting. Blood donor data can be useful in informing hepatitis B rates and evaluating vaccination programs in Canada.

Use and outcomes of hepatitis B virus-positive grafts in orthotopic liver transplantation in the United States from 1999 to 2021

The demand for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is projected to increase, which indicates a need to expand the liver donor pool. We aimed to investigate the use of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive grafts and the outcomes of recipients undergoing OLT with HBV-positive grafts. We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing all deceased donors and OLT recipients in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database from January 1999 through March 2021. Donor HBV status was positive if hepatitis B surface antigen was positive or HBV nucleic acid testing was detectable. Recipients of HBV-positive allografts were matched 1:5 to recipients of HBV-negative allografts based on recipient and donor age, transplant year, recipient sex, donation after circulatory death, recipient location, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at transplant. Among the 185,212 potential donors, 422 (0.2%) were HBV positive, and 265 (63%) of the HBV-positive grafts were transplanted (14 of 265 [5.3%] in HBV-positive recipients). The overall discard rate for HBV-positive donors of 37.2% (157/422) remained significantly higher than the discard rate for HBV-negative donors of 26.5% (49,026/185,212) during the study period ( p  < 0.001). Recipients of HBV-positive ( n = 209) grafts had similar mortality (log-rank, p = 0.47) and graft loss (log-rank, p = 0.72) rates to the matched recipients of HBV-negative allografts ( n = 1045). The 3-year graft survival rate was 77.9% for the HBV-positive group and 79.7% in the matched HBV-negative group. Based on this analysis, transplant recipients of HBV-positive liver allografts do not experience increased rates of mortality or graft loss. One strategy that may help expand the donor pool and lower the waitlist mortality rate is using HBV-positive allografts.

Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation using grafts from donors with active hepatitis B virus replication: a multicenter cohort study

Purpose

Liver grafts from donors with HBV infection contributed to expanding the donor pool under the hepatitis B immunoglobulin and antiviral agents (nucleos(t)ide analogues) in the HBV-endemic area. We report long-term outcomes of liver transplantations (LTs) using grafts from donors with active or chronic HBV infection.

Methods

Overall, 2,260 LTs performed in 3 major hospitals in Seoul from January 2000 to April 2019 were assessed for inclusion. Twenty-six grafts (1.2%) were obtained from HBsAg (+), HBeAb (+), or HBcAb (+) donors, and recipient outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. Donor and recipient demographics and transplantation outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Sixteen deceased donor LTs were performed using active HBsAg (+) grafts. Ten other LTs were sourced from 10 living donors. There was no significant difference in survival in patients who received deceased donor LTs compared with that in those who underwent LT with non-hepatitis virus-infected grafts. Fourteen patients who were followed up for >5 years were stable, and no difference in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate was observed 5 years after transplantation between transplants from donors with and those without HBV.

Conclusion

Considering long-term outcomes, liver grafts from donors with active HBV replication can be safely used for LT.

Donor heart selection: Evidence-based guidelines for providers

The proposed donor heart selection guidelines provide evidence-based and expert-consensus recommendations for the selection of donor hearts following brain death. These recommendations were compiled by an international panel of experts based on an extensive literature review.

Exploring predisposing factors and pathogenesis contributing to injuries of donor lungs

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the only therapeutic strategy for patients with incurable lung diseases. However, its use has been severely limited by the narrow donor pool and potential concerns of inferior quality of donor lungs, which are more susceptible to external influence than other transplant organs. Multiple insults, including various causes of death and a series of perimortem events, may act together on donor lungs and eventually culminate in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after transplantation as well as other poor short-term outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the predisposing factors contributing to injuries to the donor lungs, specifically focusing on the pathogenesis of these injuries and their impact on post-transplant outcomes. Additionally, various maneuvers to mitigate donor lung injuries have been proposed.

EXPERT OPINION

The selection criteria for eligible donors vary and may be poor discriminators of lung injury. Not all transplanted lungs are in ideal condition. With the rapidly increasing waiting list for LTx, the trend of using marginal donors has become more apparent, underscoring the need to gain a deeper understanding of donor lung injuries and discover more donor resources.

HBV-positive and HIV-positive organs in transplantation: A clinical guide for the hepatologist

Organ transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage organ disease, a severe condition associated with a high risk of waitlist mortality. It is primarily limited by a shortage of available organs. Maximising available donors can increase access to transplantation. Transplantation from donors positive for HBV and HIV has increased in many countries. However, antiviral therapies need to be readily available for recipients after transplantation to prevent possible reactivation of the virus following the administration of immunosuppressive therapies. Furthermore, the intentional transmission of a virus has practical, ethical, and clinical implications. In this review, we summarise the current research, focusing on grafts from donors positive for the HBV surface antigen, antibodies against the HBV core antigen, and HIV, to help hepatologists and physicians interested in transplantation to select the best antiviral and/or prophylactic regimens for after transplantation.

Approaches to pretransplant vaccination

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to summarize new data and perspectives in pretransplant vaccination, with a particular focus on COVID-19 vaccination and vaccination requirements.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pretransplant vaccination produces superior markers of immunity and is expected to have greater clinical benefit, compared with posttransplant vaccination. As such, efforts are underway to identify and characterize barriers to pretransplant vaccination, with a particular focus on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Unfortunately, vaccine hesitancy is common in transplant patients, often motivated by individual side effect and safety concerns. COVID-19 vaccination requirements have been implemented in some centres, informed by ethical principles, including beneficence, utility and justice.

SUMMARY

Barriers to pretransplant vaccination can be understood in three categories: hard stops, including issues of vaccine availability, eligibility, safety and feasibility; soft stops, including issues of convenience, prioritization and care coordination; and volitional stops related to vaccine hesitancy and refusal. All of these barriers present opportunities for improvement based on recent data.

Utilization of hepatitis B virus surface antigen positive grafts in liver transplantation: A matched study based on a national registry cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Donor shortage has become worldwide limitation in liver transplantation (LT). Use of hepatitis B virus surface antigen positive (HBsAg+) donors could be an alternative source of donor organs. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of LT using HBsAg+ liver grafts and associated long-term outcome.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adults LT registered in the database of the China Liver Transplant Registry between January 2015 and September 2018. By propensity score matching (1:1), 503 eligible patients who received HBsAg+ liver grafts were compared with 503 matched patients who received HBsAg- liver grafts.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 81.52%, 72.04%, and 66.65% in HBsAg+ donor group, which were comparable with 83.93%, 77.27%, and 65.73% in HBsAg- donor group (P = 0.222). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were also comparable between the two groups (81.49%, 71.45%, and 67.26% vs 83.62%, 77.11%, and 65.81%, respectively, P = 0.243). Most main complications were not increased in HBsAg+ donor group except for the retaining of HBsAg positivity after LT. Furthermore, transplanting HBsAg+ liver grafts did not result in inferior outcomes either in HBsAg+ or HBsAg- recipients. The risk of tumor recurrence after LT was not increased in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of using HBsAg+ liver grafts were comparable with those of HBsAg- liver grafts. Our study provided strong evidence for the safe use of HBsAg+ grafts in LT to expand the donor liver pool.

Use of Hepatitis B Viremic donors in kidney transplant recipients: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Utilization of Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected kidney allografts represents an opportunity to bridge the gap between organ supply and demand. Highly efficacious vaccines and anti-viral therapies allow these allografts to be transplanted with negligible risk to the recipient.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the prophylactic strategies and related clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who received a kidney from an HBV viremic donor.

RESULTS

Eight patients received an allograft from an HBV viremic deceased kidney donor between January 1, 2017 and December 4, 2020. All recipients were immune to hepatitis B with a surface antibody titer greater than or equal to 10 mIU/mL (range: 12 - >1000 mIU/mL). After transplant, 62.5% demonstrated HBV core antibody seroconversion at an average of 47.4 ± 28.5 days post-transplant. Anti-viral prophylaxis was initiated in 87.5% of patients; 62.5% preemptively during the transplant admission (range 1-3 days post-transplant) and 25% following HBcAb seroconversion (range 45-304 days post-transplant). Of the four patients who were started on entecavir preemptively, two subsequently core converted. These two patients had an HBV surface antibody less than 100 mIU/mL at the time of transplant. None of the recipients converted to HBV surface antigen positivity. The average estimated glomerular filtration rate was 41 ± 19 mL/min/1.73m² , and there were no significant elevations in liver enzymes through one year post-transplant.

CONCLUSION

The use of HBV viremic kidney allografts may represent an additional source of transplant organs; however, more studies are needed to better elucidate the optimal protective strategies for these recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Utilization of HCV viremic donors in kidney transplantation: a chance or a threat?

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice in end-stage renal disease. The main issue which does not allow to utilize it fully is the number of organs available for transplant. Introduction of highly effective oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) enabled transplantation of HCV viremic organs to naive recipients. Despite an increasing number of reports on the satisfying effects of using HCV viremic organs, including kidneys, they are more often rejected than those from HCV negative donors. The main reason is the presence of HCV viremia and not the quality of the organ. The current state of knowledge points to the fact that a kidney transplant from an HCV nucleic acid testing positive (NAT+) donor to naive recipients is an effective and safe solution to the problem of the insufficient number of organs available for transplantation. It does not, however, allow to draw conclusions as to the long-term consequence of such an approach. This review analyzes the possibilities and limitations of the usage of HCV NAT + donor organs. Abbreviations: DAA: direct-acting antivirals; HCV: hepatitis C virus; NAT: nucleic acid testing; OPTN: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network; KDIGO: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes; Ab: antigen; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; D: donor; R: recipient; CMV: cytomegalovirus; HBV: hepatitis B virus; UNOS: United Network for Organ Sharing; PHS: Public Health Service; EBR/GZR: elbasvir/grazoprevir; SVR: sustained virologic response; RAS: resistance-associated substitutions; SOF: soforbuvir; GLE/PIB: glecaprevir/pibrentasvir; ACR: acute cellular rejection; AR: acute rejection; DSA: donor-specific antibodies; KTR: kidney transplant recipients; AASLD: American Association for the Study of Liver Disease; IDSA: Infectious Diseases Society of America; PPI: proton pump inhibitors; CKD: chronic kidney disease; GN: glomerulonephritis; KAS: The Kidney Allocation system.

Evaluation of donor heart for transplantation

Cardiac transplantation is considered the gold-standard treatment option for patients suffering from end-stage heart failure refractory to maximum medical therapy. A major determinant of graft function and recipient survival is a comprehensive evaluation of the donor allograft. Challenges arise when designing and implementing an evidence-based donor evaluation protocol due to the number of influential donor-specific characteristics and the complex interactions that occur between them. Here, we present our systematic approach to donor evaluation by examining the impact that relevant donor variables have on graft function and recipient outcomes.

Use of Hepatitis B Virus-Positive Organs in Organ Transplantation

The significant morbidity and mortality of people with end-stage renal, liver, heart, and lung diseases in need of transplantation provides rationale for use of organs from donors who are hepatitis B positive. The recipient's hepatitis B status plays a key role in defining the prophylactic strategy. The availability of safe and effective therapies (hepatitis B antivirals and hepatitis B immune globulin) has contributed to the safety of using hepatitis B-positive donors. The outcomes in both liver and nonliver solid organ transplant recipients given hepatitis B-positive organs have been excellent if appropriate prophylactic therapies provided.

Expanding the Donor Pool: First Use of Hepatitis B Virus Nat Positive Solid Organ Allografts Into Seronegative Recipients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the 1-year safety and effectiveness of HBV Nucleic Acid Test positive (HBV NAT+) allografts in seronegative kidney transplant (KT) and liver transplant (LT) recipients.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Despite an ongoing organ shortage, the utilization of HBV NAT+ allografts into seronegative recipients has not been investigated.

METHODS

From January 2017 to October 2020, a prospective cohort study was conducted among consecutive KT and LT recipients at a single institution. Primary endpoints were post-transplant HBV viremia, graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

With median follow-up of 1-year, there were no HBV-related complications in the 89 HBV NAT+ recipients. Only 9 of 56 KTs (16.1%) and 9 of 33 LTs (27.3%) experienced post-transplant HBV viremia at a median of 185 (KT) and 269 (LT) days postoperatively. Overall, viremic episodes resolved to undetected HBV DNA after a median of 80 days of entecavir therapy in 16 of 18 recipients. Presently, 100% of KT recipients and 93.9% of LT recipients are HBV NAT- with median follow-up of 13 months, whereas 0 KT and 8 LT (24.2%) recipients are HBV surface antigen positive indicating chronic infection. KT and LT patient and allograft survival were not different between HBV NAT+ and HBV NAT- recipients (P > 0.05), whereas HBV NAT+ KT recipients had decreased waitlist time and pretransplant duration on dialysis (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series describing the transplantation of HBV NAT+ kidney and liver allografts into HBV seronegative recipients without chronic HBV viremia or decreased 1-year patient and graft survival. Increasing the utilization of HBV NAT+ organs in nonviremic recipients can play a role in decreasing the national organ shortage.

Hepatitis B Virus/Hepatitis D Virus-Coinfected Liver Transplant Candidate Receiving Hepatitis B Virus-Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Positive Allograft and Treated With High-Dose Hepatitis B Immune Globulin

Liver transplantation (LT) for patients with hepatitis D virus (HDV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection is uncommon in the United States. Previous case reports described poor outcomes when hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive grafts are transplanted in HBV/HDV-coinfected recipients. However, LT from an HBsAg-negative/HBV-deoxyribonucleic acid–positive donor in an HBV/HDV-coinfected recipient has not been reported. We describe the clinical course and management of an HBV/HDV-coinfected recipient who had LT from an HBsAg-negative/HBV-deoxyribonucleic acid–positive deceased donor and was treated with high-dose hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with an oral tenofovir alafenamide.

Influence of donor and recipient hepatitis B virus infection on long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The demand for transplantable kidneys continues to outstrip supply, and the risk of donor-derived infection limits utilization. The effect of donor or recipient HBV status, defined by surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity, on long-term survival outcomes of kidney transplant (KT) is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data from 2000 to 2019. We identified three cohorts based on donor (D) or recipient (R) HBsAg status: D-R, D-R+, and D+R-. Pairwise comparisons of patient survival (PS) and all-cause graft survival (GS) after propensity score matching were performed to assess the effect of HBV infection in KT recipients.

RESULTS

Our findings showed that there were no statistically significant differences in PS and GS among D-R, D-R+, and D+R-groups, nor was the patient or GS different between donor and recipient HBsAg+ status. Finally, in 2019 kidney discard rates were 15% higher for HBsAg+ deceased donors compared to HBsAg- donors.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg+ status was not associated with worse PS or GS after KT. Prior to broadly advocating utilization of HbsAg+ kidneys, further studies assessing KT recipient morbidity and safety are necessary.

Cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes of liver transplantation using hepatitis B core antibody-positive grafts with hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis in Korea

Background/Aims

Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive donors are used as an extended donor pool, and current guidelines recommend the usage of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) as prophylaxis for preventing de novo hepatitis B virus infection (DNH). We analyzed the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of liver transplantation (LT) patients receiving anti-HBc-positive grafts and evaluated the risk of DNH when hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy was used as prophylaxis. We also compared the cost-effectiveness of HBIG and NAs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 457 patients with anti-HBc-positive grafts and 898 patients with anti-HBc-negative grafts who underwent LT between January 2001 and December 2018. We compared recipient characteristics according to the anti-HBc status of the donor, and compared the costs of using NAs for the rest of the patient’s life and using HBIG to maintain hepatitis B surface antibody titers above 200 IU/L.

Results

The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 87.7%, 73.5%, and 67.7%, respectively, in patients with anti-HBc-positive grafts, and 88.5%, 77.4%, and 70.3%, respectively, in patients with anti-HBc-negative grafts (P=0.113). Among 457 recipients with anti-HBc-positive grafts, 117 (25.6%) were non-HBV recipients. The overall incidence of DNH was 0.9%. When using HBIG under insurance coverage, the cumulative cost was lower compared with using NA continuously without insurance coverage in Korea.

Conclusions

Anti-HBc-positive grafts alone do not affect patient survival or graft survival. HBIG monoprophylaxis has good outcomes for preventing DNH, and the patient’s long-term cost burden is low in Korea because of the national insurance system in this cohort.

2020 position statement and recommendations of the European Liver and Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA): management of hepatitis B virus-related infection before and after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis of HBV recurrence is critical after liver transplantation in HBV patients. Despite new prophylactic schemes, most European LT centres persist on a conservative approach combining hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ides analogues (NA).

AIM

This setting prompted the European Liver Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA) to look for a consensus on the prevention of HBV recurrence.

METHODS

Based on a 4-round Delphi process, ELITA investigated 16 research questions and established 50 recommendations.

RESULTS

Prophylaxis should be driven according to 3 simplified risk groups: Low and high virological risk patients, with undetectable and detectable HBV DNA pre-LT, respectively, and special populations (HDV, HCC, poorly adherent patients). In low-risk patients, short-term (4 weeks) combination of third-generation NA+ HBIG, or third generation NA monotherapy can be considered as prophylactic options. In high-risk patients, HBIG can be discontinued once HBV DNA undetectable. Combined therapy for 1 year is advised. HBV-HCC patients should be treated according to their virological risk. In HDV/HBV patients, indefinite dual prophylaxis remains the gold standard. Full withdrawal of HBV prophylaxis following or not HBV vaccination should only be attempted in the setting of clinical trials. Organs from HBsAg+ve donors may be considered after assessment of risks, benefits, and patient consent. They should not be used if HDV is present. In poorly adherent patients, dual long-term prophylaxis is recommended. Budget impact analysis should be taken into account to drive prophylactic regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

These ELITA recommendations should stimulate a more rational and homogeneous approach to HBV prophylaxis across LT programs.

Kidney transplant from donors with hepatitis B: A challenging treatment option

Utilizing kidneys from donors with hepatitis B is one way to alleviate the current organ shortage situation. However, the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission remains a challenge that undermines the chance of organs being used. This is particularly true with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive donors despite the comparable long-term outcomes when compared with standard donors. To reduce the risk of HBV transmission, a comprehensive approach is needed. This includes assessment of donor risk, optimal allocation to the proper recipient, appropriate immunosuppressive regimen, optimizing the prophylactic therapy, and post-transplant monitoring. This review provides an overview of current evidence of kidney transplants from donors with HBsAg positivity and outlines the challenge of this treatment. The topics include donor risk assessment by adopting the nucleic acid test coupled with HBV DNA as the HBV screening, optimal recipient selection, importance of hepatitis B immunity, role of nucleos(t)ide analogues, and hepatitis B immunoglobulin. A summary of reported long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation and proposed criteria to utilize kidneys from this group of donors was also defined and discussed.

Antiviral prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation: Current concepts

The advance in treatment against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with the development of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) with high genetic barrier to resistance, including entecavir and tenofovir, has improved clinical outcomes of patients transplanted for HBV infection, by preventing HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) effectively. Currently, after LT, the combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and a high-barrier NA is considered as the standard of care for prophylaxis against HBV recurrence. However, because of the high cost of intravenous high-dose HBIG, other routes of HBIG administration, such as intramuscular or subcutaneous, have come to the foreground. In addition, several transplant centres tend to use a NA as monoprophylaxis, following a short post-LT period of HBIG and NA combination. Lately, studies using HBIG-free prophylactic regimens with entecavir or tenofovir have shown promising outcomes in preventing HBV recurrence, mostly regarding patients with undetectable HBV DNA at the time of LT. Although vaccination against HBV has been an attractive prophylactic approach, its efficacy has been controversial. Moreover, further studies are needed regarding long-term outcomes of complete withdrawal anti-HBV prophylaxis. For patients transplanted for HBV/HDV co-infection, combined regimen should be administered for a longer period post-LT. Finally, the use of grafts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors is safe for HBV-negative recipients, with the administration of lifelong antiviral prophylaxis.