1
|
Xiao J, Zeng RW, Lim WH, Tan DJH, Yong JN, Fu CE, Tay P, Syn N, Ong CEY, Ong EYH, Chung CH, Lee SY, Koh JH, Teng M, Prakash S, Tan EX, Wijarnpreecha K, Kulkarni AV, Liu K, Danpanichkul P, Huang DQ, Siddiqui MS, Ng CH, Kow AWC, Muthiah MD. The incidence of adverse outcome in donors after living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis of 60,829 donors. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:493-504. [PMID: 38015449 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
The scarcity of liver grafts has prompted developments in living donor liver transplantations (LDLT), with previous literature illustrating similar outcomes in recipients compared to deceased donor transplants. However, significant concerns regarding living donor morbidity and mortality have yet to be examined comprehensively. This study aims to provide estimates of the incidence of various outcomes in living liver donors. In this meta-analysis, Medline and Embase were searched from inception to July 2022 for articles assessing the incidence of outcomes in LDLT donors. Complications in the included studies were classified into respective organ systems. Analysis of incidence was conducted using a generalized linear mixed model with Clopper-Pearson intervals. Eighty-seven articles involving 60,829 living liver donors were included. The overall pooled incidence of complications in LDLT donors was 24.7% (CI: 21.6%-28.1%). The incidence of minor complications was 17.3% (CI: 14.7%-20.3%), while the incidence of major complications was lower at 5.5% (CI: 4.5%-6.7%). The overall incidence of donor mortality was 0.06% (CI: 0.0%-0.1%) in 49,027 individuals. Psychological complications (7.6%, CI: 4.9%-11.5%) were the most common among LDLT donors, followed by wound-related (5.2%, CI: 4.4%-6.2%) and respiratory complications (4.9%, CI: 3.8%-6.3%). Conversely, cardiovascular complications had the lowest incidence among the subgroups at 0.8% (CI: 0.4%-1.3%). This study presents the incidence of post-LDLT outcomes in living liver donors, illustrating significant psychological, wound-related, and respiratory complications. While significant advancements in recent decades have contributed towards decreased morbidity in living donors, our findings call for targeted measures and continued efforts to ensure the safety and quality of life of liver donors post-LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieling Xiao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Jun Hao Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jie Ning Yong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clarissa Elysia Fu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Phoebe Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Biostatistics & Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christen En Ya Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elden Yen Hng Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Charlotte Hui Chung
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shi Yan Lee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Hong Koh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Margaret Teng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Sameer Prakash
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Eunice Xx Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Karn Wijarnpreecha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Anand V Kulkarni
- Department of Liver Transplantation, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Ken Liu
- A.W. Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Australian Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Liver Injury and Cancer Program, Centenary Institute of Cancer Medicine and Cell Biology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pojsakorn Danpanichkul
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Daniel Q Huang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alfred Wei Chieh Kow
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mark D Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giglio MC, Dolce P, Yilmaz S, Tokat Y, Acarli K, Kilic M, Zeytunlu M, Unek T, Karam V, Adam R, Polak WG, Fondevila C, Nadalin S, Troisi RI. Development of a model to predict the risk of early graft failure after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: An ELTR study. Liver Transpl 2023:01445473-990000000-00296. [PMID: 38079264 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Graft survival is a critical end point in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT), where graft procurement endangers the lives of healthy individuals. Therefore, ALDLT must be responsibly performed in the perspective of a positive harm-to-benefit ratio. This study aimed to develop a risk prediction model for early (3 months) graft failure (EGF) following ALDLT. Donor and recipient factors associated with EGF in ALDLT were studied using data from the European Liver Transplant Registry. An artificial neural network classification algorithm was trained on a set of 2073 ALDLTs, validated using cross-validation, tested on an independent random-split sample (n=518), and externally validated on United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data. Model performance was assessed using the AUC, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Graft type, graft weight, level of hospitalization, and the severity of liver disease were associated with EGF. The model ( http://ldlt.shinyapps.io/eltr_app ) presented AUC values at cross-validation, in the independent test set, and at external validation of 0.69, 0.70, and 0.68, respectively. Model calibration was fair. The decision curve analysis indicated a positive net benefit of the model, with an estimated net reduction of 5-15 EGF per 100 ALDLTs. Estimated risks>40% and<5% had a specificity of 0.96 and sensitivity of 0.99 in predicting and excluding EGF, respectively. The model also stratified long-term graft survival ( p <0.001), which ranged from 87% in the low-risk group to 60% in the high-risk group. In conclusion, based on a panel of donor and recipient variables, an artificial neural network can contribute to decision-making in ALDLT by predicting EGF risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Dolce
- Department of Translational Medicine, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Sezai Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Yaman Tokat
- International Liver Center & Acibadem Healthcare Hospitals, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Koray Acarli
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Kilic
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Izmir Kent Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Murat Zeytunlu
- Departments of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Ege University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Tarkan Unek
- Department of General Surgery, Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Narlidere, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Vincent Karam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Univ Paris-Sud, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - René Adam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Univ Paris-Sud, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Constantino Fondevila
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Lucey
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (M.R.L.), the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (K.N.F.), and the Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation (D.P.F.), University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - Katryn N Furuya
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (M.R.L.), the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (K.N.F.), and the Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation (D.P.F.), University of Wisconsin, Madison
| | - David P Foley
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (M.R.L.), the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (K.N.F.), and the Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation (D.P.F.), University of Wisconsin, Madison
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ziogas IA, Kakos CD, Moris DP, Kaltenmeier C, Tsoulfas G, Montenovo MI, Alexopoulos SP, Geller DA, Pomfret EA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopy-assisted versus pure laparoscopic versus robotic living donor hepatectomy. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:1063-1078. [PMID: 36866856 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
The value of minimally invasive approaches for living donor hepatectomy remains unclear. Our aim was to compare the donor outcomes after open versus laparoscopy-assisted versus pure laparoscopic versus robotic living donor hepatectomy (OLDH vs. LALDH vs. PLLDH vs. RLDH). A systematic literature review of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement (up to December 8, 2021). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed separately for minor and major living donor hepatectomy. The risk of bias in nonrandomized studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 31 studies were included. There was no difference in donor outcomes after OLDH versus LALDH for major hepatectomy. However, PLLDH was associated with decreased estimated blood loss, length of stay (LOS), and overall complications versus OLDH for minor and major hepatectomy, but also with increased operative time for major hepatectomy. PLLDH was associated with decreased LOS versus LALDH for major hepatectomy. RLDH was associated with decreased LOS but with increased operative time versus OLDH for major hepatectomy. The scarcity of studies comparing RLDH versus LALDH/PLLDH did not allow us to meta-analyze donor outcomes for that comparison. There seems to be a marginal benefit in estimated blood loss and/or LOS in favor of PLLDH and RLDH. The complexity of these procedures limits them to transplant centers with high volume and experience. Future studies should investigate self-reported donor experience and the associated economic costs of these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Ziogas
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos D Kakos
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios P Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christof Kaltenmeier
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Martin I Montenovo
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fan Y, Nashan B, Wu X, Zhang H, Shi Y. Prevalence and factors associated with depression and anxiety in living liver donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2023; 173:111443. [PMID: 37562147 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to systematically review the prevalence and factors associated with depression and anxiety in living liver donors after liver transplantation. METHODS Five English language electronic databases and four Chinese language electronic databases were searched from inception to February 2023. Two investigators independently extracted the data and assessed the study quality. The pooled prevalence was calculated using STATA software (version 14.0). We performed a narrative review to summarize the factors associated with depression and anxiety in living liver donors after liver transplantation. The protocol of this study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database, registration number: CRD42021290071. RESULTS This study included 39 articles involving 18,577 participants. The pooled prevalence was 6.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) (4.1-8.9%)] for depression in living liver donors, and 10.0% [95% CI (4.0-18.1%)] for anxiety. Prevalence of clinically significant depressive or anxiety symptoms was higher (15.7% and 17.4%) compared with disorders (2.7% and 2.2%). The prevalence of depression and anxiety was highest within 3 months post-donation. Specifically, female donors, serious postoperative complications, and recipients' poor health/death have been reported as factors having a negative influence on depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Collected evidence showed that the overall prevalence of depression or anxiety of living liver donors was high. Therefore, early detection and timely treatment of psychological disorders are crucial to promote positive psychiatric health outcomes and ensure the quality of life of living liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaru Fan
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Björn Nashan
- Department of Organ Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
| | - Xiaxin Wu
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Haiming Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Beijing Key Laboratory of Tolerance Induction and Organ Protection in Transplantation, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Yuexian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pillai A, Goldaracena N, Rosenblatt R, Verna EC. CAQ Corner: Evaluation and management of living liver donors. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:1118-1128. [PMID: 37243369 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Russell Rosenblatt
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim SH, Kim KH, Cho HD. Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15080. [PMID: 37529969 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the acceptability of donor remnant liver volume (RLV) to total liver volume (TLV) ratio (RLV/TLV) being <30% as safe in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs). METHODS Online databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2022. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model. RESULTS One prospective and seven retrospective studies comprising 1935 patients (164 RLV/TLV <30% vs. 1771 RLV/TLV ≥30%) were included. Overall (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002) and minor (OR = 1.88; 95% CI [1.23, 2.88]; p = .004) morbidities were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002). No significant differences were noted in the major morbidity, biliary complications, and hepatic dysfunction. Peak levels of bilirubin (SMD = .50; 95% CI [.07, .93]; p = .02) and international normalized ratio (SMD = .68; 95% CI [.04, 1.32]; p = .04) were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥ 30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group. No significant differences were noted in the peak alanine transferase and aspartate transaminase levels and hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Considering the safety of the donor as the top priority, the eligibility of a potential liver donor in LDLT whose RLV/TLV is expected to be <30% should not be accepted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Hoon Kim
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. Medical-ethical guidelines: Living donation of solid organs. Swiss Med Wkly 2023; 153:40126. [PMID: 37774384 DOI: 10.57187/smw.2023.40126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
No abstract available.
Collapse
|
9
|
Jesse MT, Jackson WE, Liapakis A, Ganesh S, Humar A, Goldaracena N, Levitsky J, Mulligan D, Pomfret EA, Ladner DP, Roberts JP, Mavis A, Thiessen C, Trotter J, Winder GS, Griesemer AD, Pillai A, Kumar V, Verna EC, LaPointe Rudow D, Han HH. Living donor liver transplant candidate and donor selection and engagement: Meeting report from the living donor liver transplant consensus conference. Clin Transplant 2023:e14954. [PMID: 36892182 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a promising option for mitigating the deceased donor organ shortage and reducing waitlist mortality. Despite excellent outcomes and data supporting expanding candidate indications for LDLT, broader uptake throughout the United States has yet to occur. METHODS In response to this, the American Society of Transplantation hosted a virtual consensus conference (October 18-19, 2021), bringing together relevant experts with the aim of identifying barriers to broader implementation and making recommendations regarding strategies to address these barriers. In this report, we summarize the findings relevant to the selection and engagement of both the LDLT candidate and living donor. Utilizing a modified Delphi approach, barrier and strategy statements were developed, refined, and voted on for overall barrier importance and potential impact and feasibility of the strategy to address said barrier. RESULTS Barriers identified fell into three general categories: 1) awareness, acceptance, and engagement across patients (potential candidates and donors), providers, and institutions, 2) data gaps and lack of standardization in candidate and donor selection, and 3) data gaps regarding post-living liver donation outcomes and resource needs. CONCLUSIONS Strategies to address barriers included efforts toward education and engagement across populations, rigorous and collaborative research, and institutional commitment and resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle T Jesse
- Transplant Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Whitney E Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - AnnMarie Liapakis
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale New Haven Transplant Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Swaytha Ganesh
- Thomas E Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Thomas E Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Josh Levitsky
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Mulligan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Daniela P Ladner
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John P Roberts
- UCSF Department of Surgery, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Alisha Mavis
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Duke University Health, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carrie Thiessen
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - James Trotter
- Transplant Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Adam D Griesemer
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Heath, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology/Transplant, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dianne LaPointe Rudow
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hyosun H Han
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laskowski NM, Brandt G, Tigges-Limmer K, Halbeisen G, Paslakis G. Donor and Donation Images (DDI)-A Scoping Review of What We Know and What We Don't. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12030952. [PMID: 36769600 PMCID: PMC9917729 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Organ transplantation is associated with significant physical and psychological burden for the recipients. Qualitative reports indicate that organ recipients develop donor and donation images (DDI)-conceptions of the donor and/or the organ. A deeper understanding of DDI is needed in the care of transplant recipients. To present the current state of knowledge, we searched for and identified DDI-related publications in PubMed and Scopus. Inclusion criteria were (1) studies addressing transplant recipients, and (2) English or German language. Twenty-one studies of individuals with transplanted hearts, lungs, or kidneys were included in this scoping review. Prevalence for DDI ranged from 6% to 52.3%. DDI occurs both before and after transplantation and includes ideas about the donor as well as whether and how the recipient's personality may be altered by the transplanted organ. Some transplant recipients did indeed report personality changes following transplantation due to the adoption of assumed donor characteristics. One study showed a positive association between the presence of DDI and anxiety scores and one described a coping effect. DDI is understudied and should be systematically assessed to improve care for the vulnerable group of individuals undergoing organ transplantation. Current research gaps and future directions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora M. Laskowski
- University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, Virchowstr. 65, 32312 Luebbecke, Germany
| | - Gerrit Brandt
- University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, Virchowstr. 65, 32312 Luebbecke, Germany
| | - Katharina Tigges-Limmer
- Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Georg Halbeisen
- University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, Virchowstr. 65, 32312 Luebbecke, Germany
| | - Georgios Paslakis
- University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Campus East-Westphalia, Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, Virchowstr. 65, 32312 Luebbecke, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liver Paired Exchange: Programmatic Hopes and Fears. Transplantation 2022; 107:849-854. [PMID: 36445920 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
The dearth of deceased liver donors has created a supply demand gap, necessitating creation of living donor liver transplantation. However, living donor liver transplantation has relied on directed donation, whereby many potential directed donors are rejected based on ABO blood group incompatibility, hepatic size incompatibility, or the need for biliary or arterial reconstruction during transplant surgery. Much like kidney paired exchange, liver paired exchange (LPE) circumvents these incompatibility issues by relying on anonymous, nondirected, or bridge donors that are better anatomical or histological matches for recipients. Although Asia has taken the lead in LPE, the process has only recently been adopted in North America, with the first successful surgery done in the United States in 2019. Our review article sheds light on the process of LPE and the success of LPE in the United States thus far and, additionally, highlights the several logistical and ethical challenges that must be considered as transplant centers adopt and scale up LPE across the United States to address the increased demand for liver allografts.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cheah YL, Heimbach J, Kwon CHD, Pomposelli J, Rudow DL, Broering D, Spiro M, Raptis DA, Roberts JP. Influence of surgical technique in donor hepatectomy on immediate and short-term living donor outcomes - A systematic review of the literature, meta-analysis, and expert panel recommendations. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14703. [PMID: 35538019 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are currently no guidelines pertaining to ERAS pathways in living donor hepatectomy. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify whether surgical technique influences immediate and short-term outcomes after living liver donation surgery. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel (CRD42021260707). Endpoints were mortality, overall complications, serious complications, bile eaks, pulmonary complications, estimated blood loss and length of stay. RESULTS Of the 2410 screened articles, 21 articles were included for final analysis; three observational, 13 retrospective cohort, four prospective cohort studies, and one randomized trial. Overall complications were higher with right versus left hepatectomy (26.8% vs. 20.8%; OR 1.4, P = .010). Donors after left hepatectomy had shorter length of stay (MD 1.4 days) compared to right hepatectomy. There was no difference in outcomes after right donor hepatectomy with versus without middle hepatic vein. We had limited data on the influence of incision type and minimally invasive approaches on living donor outcomes, and no data on the effect of operative time on donor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Left donor hepatectomy should be preferred over right hepatectomy, as it is related to improved donor short-term outcomes (QOE; Moderate | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Right donor hepatectomy with or without MHV has equivalent outcomes (QOE; Moderate | Grade of Recommendation; Strong); no preference is recommended, decision should be based on program's experience and expertise. No difference in outcomes was observed related to incision type, minimally invasive vs. open (QOE; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Weak); no preference can be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yee L Cheah
- Roger L Jenkins Transplant Institute, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, USA
| | - Julie Heimbach
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | - James Pomposelli
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA
| | | | - Dieter Broering
- Organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
- Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - John P Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hendrickse A, Ko J, Sakai T. The care of donors and recipients in adult living donor liver transplantation. BJA Educ 2022; 22:387-395. [PMID: 36132878 PMCID: PMC9482866 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. Hendrickse
- University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - J. Ko
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - T. Sakai
- UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abdel-Khalek EE, Abdel-Wahab M, Elgazzar MH, Khattab MA, El-Gilany AH, Elgouhari HM, Shehta A. Long-term follow-up of living liver donors: A single-center experience. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:1490-1499. [PMID: 35289076 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Living donors are healthy individuals who are exposed to a major surgical procedure during which a major part of their liver is resected. Data on the long-term consequences of living liver donation are scarce. This study examined clinical, laboratory, and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 237 living liver donors and 239 matched controls during 48-168 months of postdonation follow-up. We used the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), version 1. The scores for the four following subscales were higher in nondonors than in donors: physical functioning (p = 0.009), role limitations due to physical health (p = 0.002), energy/fatigue (p < 0.001), and bodily pain (p < 0.001). The scores on the eight subscales of the SF-36 were higher in donors with living recipients than in donors whose recipients died (p < 0.001). Our results suggest that living donor right hepatectomy is safe and results in a postdonation HRQoL similar to that of nondonors in those donors whose recipients are healthy, whereas donors whose recipients die have a lower HRQoL that is significantly negatively correlated with the time since recipient death and improves over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehab E Abdel-Khalek
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
- Liver Transplant Unit, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed H Elgazzar
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud A Khattab
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Minia, Minia, Egypt
| | - Abdel-Hady El-Gilany
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Ahmed Shehta
- Liver Transplant Unit, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fox AN, Liapakis A, Batra R, Bittermann T, Emamaullee J, Emre S, Genyk Y, Han H, Jackson W, Pomfret E, Raza M, Rodriguez-Davalos M, Rubman Gold S, Samstein B, Shenoy A, Taner T, Roberts JP. The use of nondirected donor organs in living donor liver transplantation: Perspectives and guidance. Hepatology 2022; 75:1579-1589. [PMID: 34859474 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Interest in anonymous nondirected living organ donation is increasing in the United States and a small number of transplantation centers are accumulating an experience regarding nondirected donation in living donor liver transplantation. Herein, we review current transplant policy, discuss emerging data, draw parallels from nondirected kidney donation, and examine relevant considerations in nondirected living liver donation. We aim to provide a consensus guidance to ensure safe evaluation and selection of nondirected living liver donors and a schema for just allocation of nondirected grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson N Fox
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) Center for Liver Disease and Transplanation NY Presbyterian HospitalColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and SurgeonsNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - AnnMarie Liapakis
- Yale-New Haven Health Transplanation CenterYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Ramesh Batra
- Yale-New Haven Health Transplanation CenterYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Therese Bittermann
- Penn Transplant InstitutePenn MedicinePerelman School of Medicine Unniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Juliet Emamaullee
- University of Southern California (USC) Transplant InstituteKeck School of Medicine of USCLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Sukru Emre
- Yale-New Haven Health Transplanation CenterYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Yuri Genyk
- University of Southern California (USC) Transplant InstituteKeck School of Medicine of USCLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Hyosun Han
- University of Southern California (USC) Transplant InstituteKeck School of Medicine of USCLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Whitney Jackson
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and EducationUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraColoradoUSA
| | - Elizabeth Pomfret
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and EducationUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineAuroraColoradoUSA
| | - Muhammad Raza
- Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Susan Rubman Gold
- Yale-New Haven Health Transplanation CenterYale University School of MedicineNew HavenConnecticutUSA
| | - Benjamin Samstein
- Weill Cornell Medicine Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation NY Presbyterian HospitalWeill Cornell School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Akhil Shenoy
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) Center for Liver Disease and Transplanation NY Presbyterian HospitalColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and SurgeonsNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Timucin Taner
- Mayo Clinic Transplant CenterMayo Clinic College of MedicineRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - John P Roberts
- Organ Transplant ProgramUniversity of California San Francisco (UCSF) HealthUCSF School of MedicineSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sakai T, Ko JS, Crouch CE, Kumar S, Choi GS, Hackl F, Han DH, Kaufman M, Kim SH, Luzzi C, McCluskey S, Shin WJ, Sirianni J, Song KW, Sullivan C, Hendrickse A. Perioperative management of living donor liver transplantation: Part 2 - Donors. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14690. [PMID: 35477939 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation method has become a widely practiced and established transplantation option for adult patients suffering with end-stage liver disease, and it has successfully helped address the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplantation Anesthesiologists jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of adult live liver donors undergoing donor hemi-hepatectomy. The goal of the review is to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live donors. We featured the current status, donor selection process, outcomes and complications, surgical procedure, anesthetic management, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, avoidance of blood transfusion, and considerations for emergency donation. Recent surgical advances, including laparoscopic donor hemi-hepatectomy and robotic laparoscopic donor surgery, are also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuro Sakai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin Sangwook Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cara E Crouch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sathish Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Florian Hackl
- Department of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of HBP Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Michael Kaufman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Seong Hoon Kim
- Organ Transplantation Center, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Carla Luzzi
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart McCluskey
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Won Jung Shin
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joel Sirianni
- Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ki Won Song
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cinnamon Sullivan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Adrian Hendrickse
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
BAYAM G, PAMUK G, AKSOY H, ZEYTUNLU M, ÖNGEL K. CANLI KARACİĞER DONÖRLERİNDE YAŞAM KALİTESİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNIVERSITESI TIP FAKÜLTESI DERGISI 2021. [DOI: 10.17517/ksutfd.983125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: In this study, it was aimed to examine the effect of transplantation on physical, mental and psychosocial health of donors by evaluating the quality of life of living liver donors after transplantation.
Methods: The study was conducted with three groups at XXXX University Faculty of Medicine Organ Transplantation and Research Center. 43 living donors from 2017 and 43 living donors from 2007-2016 who underwent liver transplantation were randomly selected to participate in the study. Also 43 control subjects were selected randomly from the community. The study was conducted by a single interviewer between 01.02.2018 and 31.05.2018 by telephone or e-mail. The socio-demographic data questionnaire, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HADS) prepared by the researchers were applied to all participants.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 38.04 ± 9.84 years, and of these participants 48.1% (n= 62) of them were female. When donors and control group were evaluated in terms of their quality of life, no significant difference was found between physical role, energy(vitality) and mental health subgroups(p> 0.05). However, donors have a better quality of life in physical functioning, emotional aspect, social functioning, pain and general health subgroups. It was detected that the quality of life was not affected by age, gender, marital status, educational status, economic status, job loss, comorbidity or disturbance by presence of operational scar. Only sexual problems and the loss of the recipient’s life were observed to have a negative impact on the quality of life. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of anxiety and depression (p
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gizem BAYAM
- IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE
| | - Gülseren PAMUK
- IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE
| | - Hilal AKSOY
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine
| | - Murat ZEYTUNLU
- EGE UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF SURGICAL MEDICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY
| | - Kurtuluş ÖNGEL
- IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sonnenberg EM, Lee-Riddle GS, Walls DO, Caicedo JC, Jackson WE, Hughes L, Ladner DP, Liapakis A, Pomfret EA, Sarkar M, Selzner N, Torres AM, Abt PL, Olthoff KM. Pregnancy Outcomes After Living Liver Donation: A Multi-Institutional Study. Liver Transpl 2021; 27:1262-1272. [PMID: 33993632 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Nearly half of living liver donors in North America are women of child-bearing age. Fetal and maternal outcomes after donation are unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of female living liver donors (aged 18-50 years at donation) from 6 transplant centers. Participants were surveyed about their pregnancies and fertility. Outcomes were compared between predonation and postdonation pregnancies. Generalized estimating equations were clustered on donor and adjusted for age at pregnancy, parity, and pregnancy year. Among the 276 donors surveyed, 151 donors responded (54.7% response rate) and reported 313 pregnancies; 168/199 (68.8%) of the predonation pregnancies and 82/114 (71.9%) of the postdonation pregnancies resulted in live births, whereas 16.6% and 24.6% resulted in miscarriage, respectively. Women with postdonation pregnancies were older (32.0 versus 26.7 years; P < 0.001) and more frequently reported abnormal liver enzymes during pregnancy (3.5% versus 0.0%; P = 0.02) and delivery via cesarean delivery (35.4% versus 19.7%; P = 0.01). On adjusted analysis, there was no difference in cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.98-6.08), miscarriage (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.78-3.24), combined endpoints of pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.36-4.49), or intrauterine growth restriction and preterm birth (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.19-4.3). Of the 49 women who attempted pregnancy after donation, 11 (22.5%) self-reported infertility; however, 8/11 (72.7%) eventually had live births. Aside from increased reporting of abnormal liver enzymes and cesarean deliveries, there was no significant difference in pregnancy outcomes before and after living liver donation. One-fifth of women who attempt pregnancy after liver donation reported infertility, and although the majority went on to successful live births, further exploration is needed to understand the contributing factors. Future research should continue to monitor this patient-centered outcome across a large cohort of donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grace S Lee-Riddle
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David O Walls
- Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Juan C Caicedo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Whitney E Jackson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, and the Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and Education, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Lisa Hughes
- Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Daniela P Ladner
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Department of Surgery and the Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research and Education, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Monika Sarkar
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ana Marie Torres
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter L Abt
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kim M Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Flaig C, Humar A, Kirshner E, Hughes C, Ganesh S, Tevar A, Steel JL. Post-operative outcomes in anonymous living liver donors: What motivates individuals to donate to strangers. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14438. [PMID: 34292636 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Anonymous living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a strategy to address the shortage of available transplantable livers; however, few studies have been conducted on this population. The objective of this study was to describe the motivations and medical, psychosocial, and financial outcomes of anonymous living liver donors. Between 2010-2019, 116 anonymous living liver donors were evaluated, 59 (51.7%) of whom proceeded to surgery. A subset of 21 anonymous donors were matched to biologically/emotionally related donors according to age, gender, race, and duration since surgery. A medical chart review and post-surgical interviews were performed to assess medical and financial outcomes. The primary motivation for donors was an unselfish desire to help others (43, 72.9%). A total of 13 (22%) anonymous donors experienced complications. Of these, 7 (11.9%) were grade I Clavien-Dindo classification, 5 (8.5%) grade II, and 1 was grade III (1.7%); and no patients had grade IV-V Clavien-Dindo complications. Increased anxiety was reported by 3 (5.1%) donors, and one donor reported clinical levels of depression (1.7%). Within the matched controls, anonymous donors were not significantly different to biologically/emotionally related donors with regard to surgical complications, psychosocial, or financial outcomes. Allowing a greater number of anonymous donors may facilitate the reduction of the waitlist for liver transplant candidates. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Flaig
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Surgery.,University of Pittsburgh Department of Psychology
| | - Abhinav Humar
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Surgery
| | - Emily Kirshner
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Surgery
| | | | - Swaytha Ganesh
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Surgery
| | - Amit Tevar
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Surgery
| | - Jennifer L Steel
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Surgery.,University of Pittsburgh Department of Psychology.,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mental Health and Well-Being of Solid Organ Transplant Donors. The Forgotten Sacrifices. TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology2030026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In light of a global organ shortage, living donor transplantation has become increasingly relevant as an alternative to deceased donor transplantation. While current research has revolved around the medical aspects of transplantation, there remains a paucity of literature regarding the quality of life (QOL) of living donors. Hence, this review aims to provide a comprehensive outline of the current landscape of living liver and kidney transplantation, with a focus on the mental health and wellbeing of donors. As highlighted in previous studies, organ donation has a significant impact on both physical and mental aspects of donor wellbeing, with marked deteriorations occurring in the short term. Furthermore, other qualitative aspects such as financial burden contribute greatly to donor distress, reflecting a need for improved donor care. To address these pertinent issues, recommendations for a successful transplant program are detailed in this review, which encompasses psychological and social aspects of donor care throughout the donation process. Further research can be done on the impact of recipient deaths on donor QOL and appropriate interventions. Overall, given the selfless sacrifices of living donors, the care of their mental wellbeing is essential. Therefore, greater emphasis should be placed on the provision of adequate psychosocial support for them.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ng CH, Lim WH, Lim XC, Xiao J, Tan DJH, Syn N, Ho CS, Kow AWC, Tan EXX, Fung J, Muthiah MD. A Meta-Analysis on the Incidence of Donor Related Depression after Liver Transplant. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2061-2070. [PMID: 34273136 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is increasing, yet gaps exist in the understanding of psychological wellbeing of donors after liver transplant. This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for donor-related depression after liver transplantation. METHODS A search was conducted on Medline and Embase database. Articles assessing incidence of depression in LDLT donors were included. Incidence was pooled after Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation. For risk factors, dichotomous variables were analyzed with generalized linear model while a conventional meta regression with logit transformation was conducted for continuous variables. RESULTS Of 1,069 abstracts, 40 articles underwent full-text review. 17 articles were included. The pooled incidence of depression among 1,888 LT donors was 7.66% (CI: 4.47% - 12.80%). Depression rates were significantly higher in Asian compared to Western studies (RR: 1.73, CI: 1.19 - 2.52, p=0.0039). Female gender (p<0.001), Caucasian ethnicity (p=0.047), employment status (p<0.001) and lower education levels (p=0.044) were significantly associated with depression. Donor relationship with recipients was not a significant risk factor. CONCLUSIONS LDLT remains a core aspect of the treatment of end-stage liver disease. However, the high depression rates after LT suggest that there remains room for improvement in the care of donors' mental health post-transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xiong Chang Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jieling Xiao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Jun Hao Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Biostatistics & Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore
| | - Cyrus Sh Ho
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alfred Wei Chieh Kow
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore.,Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital.,Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Eunice Xiang Xuan Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Fung
- Division of Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Mark Dhinesh Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Erdogan MA, Ucar M, Ozgul U, Erdogan S, Colak YZ, Ozhan O, Yaman R, Ugur Y, Aydemir S, Parlakpinar H. Preoperative and Postoperative Endogenous Melatonin and Anxiety Levels and Their Correlation in Living Liver Donors. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2021. [PMID: 34269646 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2021.0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES High anxiety levels may lead to mental and physical changes that may affect quality of life. Melatonin has anxiolytic properties. It has been reported that administration of melatonin reduces anxiety. In this study, we examined the preoperative and postoperative anxiety levels of living liver donors and the correlation between anxiety levels and endogenous melatonin levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective clinical study included 56 living liver donors who underwent right hepatectomy (39 women, 17 men; average age of 29 ± 7 years). The anxiety levels were evaluated by using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Test with a form for this test used to measure the current state of anxiety score and another form used to measure the underlying anxiety score of the patient. These forms were applied preoperatively and postoperatively. Blood samples were taken simultaneously for melatonin levels. Melatonin levels were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography. Our primary outcomes were to determine the preoperative and postoperative endogenous melatonin and anxiety levels of living liver donors and to investigate their correlations. RESULTS A statistically significant difference was observed between preoperative and postoperative state of anxiety scores. The preoperative and postoperative underlying anxiety scores were similar. A statistically significant difference was found between the preoperative endogenous melatonin level and postoperative endogenous melatonin level. A significant correlation was not observed between the preoperative and postoperative current and underlying anxiety levels or endogenous melatonin levels. CONCLUSIONS Living liver donors had high anxiety levels during the preoperative and postoperative periods. A significant decrease was identified in the postoperative hour 24 endogenous melatonin level. These results may lay the foundation for interventions that can identify emotional changes as well as control and improve the mental health of living liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Ali Erdogan
- From the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ong JQL, Lim LJH, Ho RCM, Ho CSH. Depression, anxiety, and associated psychological outcomes in living organ transplant donors: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2021; 70:51-75. [PMID: 33721612 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
With increasing demands for living organ donations, understanding the prevalence of depression and anxiety, which are the commonest psychiatric disorders in donors following organ transplantation, will serve to improve psychiatric care to safeguard donors' mental wellbeing. This descriptive systematic review examines all observational studies in English investigating prevalence of depression and anxiety in adult transplant donors using bibliographic databases. Sixty-two papers were included (kidney, n = 25; liver, n = 25; bone marrow, n = 7; uterus, n = 2; lung, n = 1; kidney and lung concurrently, n = 2). Post-transplantation depression and anxiety prevalence rates (Depression: 0-46.9%, Anxiety: 0-66.7%) did not differ significantly from pre-transplantation and were largely comparable to the general population. Other psychiatric disorders observed included bipolar disorder, conversion disorder, adjustment disorder and sleep disorder. Other psychological outcomes observed included lower quality of life, lower satisfaction of life and regret after donation. Pre-donation risk factors such as poor physical/psychological health status, and post-donation risk factors such as complicated post-surgical recovery and poor physical/psychological health in recipients were identified, predisposing donors to poor psychological outcomes. Individuals with risk factors should be monitored and provided with social support, psychoeducation, psychotherapy and long-term follow up. Future studies should adopt consistent methodological approaches to improve comparability between various studies. More research investigating poor psychological outcomes in other organ donors besides kidney and liver donors, donors who have past psychiatric history, unrelated and parent donors is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Q L Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Roger C M Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Institute of Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cyrus S H Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Takatsuki M, Hidaka M, Natsuda K, Adachi T, Ono S, Hamada T, Kugiyama T, Ito S, Kanetaka K, Eguchi S. Prevention of delayed gastric emptying after living donor left hepatectomy. Asian J Surg 2021; 44:1274-1277. [PMID: 33750679 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is uncomfortable complication after left hepatectomy. The aim of this study is to show our strategy to prevent DGE after living donor left hepatectomy. METHODS The cases were divided into 3 groups as without any prevention (control group), prevented DGE with putting omentum between the liver and pylorus (O group), and with putting a Seprafilm (S group). The incidence of DGE and the CT finding 1 month after surgery were retrospectively compared between the groups. RESULTS The incidence of DGE was significantly decreased in O and S group than control group (P < 0.05, Fisher's test). In S group, fluid collection along the cutting surface of the liver was observed on CT significantly more than other groups, but the incidence of bile leakage was adversely less in S groups than other groups, meaning that collected fluid in S group were presumed as the ascites without bile. CONCLUSION Omentum patching and Seprafilm were equally effective to prevent DGE after living donor left hepatectomy, and Seprafilm might be better because it is more physiologic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuhisa Takatsuki
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
| | - Masaaki Hidaka
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Koji Natsuda
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Ono
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takashi Hamada
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tota Kugiyama
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Ito
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kengo Kanetaka
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Patel MS, Mohamed Z, Ghanekar A, Sapisochin G, McGilvray I, Sayed BA, Reichman T, Selzner M, Gross JA, Galvin Z, Bhat M, Lilly L, Cattral M, Selzner N. Living donor liver paired exchange: A North American first. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:400-404. [PMID: 32524750 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Paired organ exchange can be used to circumvent living donor-recipient ABO incompatibilities. Herein, we present the first case of successful liver paired exchange in North America. This 2-way swap required 4 simultaneous operations: 2 living donor hepatectomies and 2 living donor liver transplants. A nondirected anonymous living donor gift initiated this domino exchange, alleviating an ABO incompatibility in the other donor-recipient pair. With careful attention to ethical and logistical issues, paired liver exchange is a feasible option to expand the donor pool for incompatible living liver donor-recipient pairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhukar S Patel
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zubaida Mohamed
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian McGilvray
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Blayne A Sayed
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Trevor Reichman
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Markus Selzner
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jed A Gross
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zita Galvin
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mamatha Bhat
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Les Lilly
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark Cattral
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shi Y, Liu C, Zhang H, Huang Y, Sun M, Wang W, Shang S. Changes in the quality of life of living liver donors: A meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 109:103586. [PMID: 32531567 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehending the physical, psychological, social benefits, and harm associated with liver donation is critical in promoting practices to maintain donors' long-term health. However, changes in quality of life among living liver donors pre- and post-donation have not been established. OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies examined the quality of life changes among living liver donors pre- and post-donation. METHODS PubMed, Embase, CINHAL with full text, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses were mainly searched for full-text articles from inception till December 2018 to identify studies assessing the quality of life of living liver donors. The methodological quality of the included studies was examined. The quality of life post-donation at five assessment points, ≤1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and ≥ 24 months were compared with the pre-donation, respectively. RESULTS The search yielded 2215 records, and a total of 15 articles (13 studies) with 715 donors were included in this meta-analysis. Physical functioning scores at ≤1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and ≥24 months post-donation were significantly lower than pre-donation [overall standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.67, 95% CI: -0.86, -0.49; p ≤]. Significantly higher level of pain was found at 3-month post-donation (SMD, -1.05; 95% CI: -1.26, -0.85; p < 0.00001). Also, a significantly higher level of anxiety was found at 3-month post-donation (SMD, -0.29; 95%CI: -0.51, -0.07; p = 0.01), but there were no significant changes in general psychological state and depression. A significant reduction in donors' social quality of life (SMD, -2.61; 95%CI: -4.75, 0.48; p = 0.02) was found at ≤1-month post-donation, and recovery to pre-donation levels occurred at 3 months post-donation. CONCLUSIONS Living liver donation was associated with a decline in physical functioning, which was sustained for longer than 2 years post-donation. Impaired social and psychological quality of life affected donors for 1-3 months after their donation. The quality of life of living liver donors has become a pressing issue requiring more attention from doctors and nurses within the transplant team. However, multicenter, prospective, and longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the long-term safety of living liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexian Shi
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Chunxia Liu
- Department of urinary surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, 100161, Beijing, China
| | - Haiming Zhang
- Liver Transplantation Center; Clinical Center for Pediatric Liver Transplantation; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
| | - Yaqi Huang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Meng Sun
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wenru Wang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Shaomei Shang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mathur AK, Hong BA, Goodrich NP, Xing J, Warren PH, Gifford KA, Merion RM, Ojo AO. Satisfaction with life and depressive symptoms in living organ donors and non‐donors: New insights from the National Living Donor Assistance Center. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13838. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amit K. Mathur
- Transplant Surgery Mayo Clinic Phoenix AZ USA
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Mayo Clinic Phoenix Phoenix AZ USA
| | - Barry A. Hong
- Psychiatric Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA
| | | | - Jiawei Xing
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health Ann Arbor MI USA
| | | | | | | | - Akinlolu O. Ojo
- Medical School Administration, University of Kansas School of Medicine Kansas KS USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shizuku M, Kamei H, Kimura H, Kurata N, Jobara K, Yoshizawa A, Ishizuka K, Okada A, Kishi S, Ozaki N, Ogura Y. Clinical Features and Long-Term Outcomes of Living Donors of Liver Transplantation Who Developed Psychiatric Disorders. Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e918500. [PMID: 32001667 PMCID: PMC7011571 DOI: 10.12659/aot.918500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the field of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), it is important to ensure donor's psychological well-being. We report on clinical features and long-term outcomes of LDLT donors who developed psychiatric disorders after their donor operations. Additionally, we compare patient backgrounds, as well as surgical and perioperative aspects between LDLT donors with and without postoperative psychiatric complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between November 1998 and March 2018, we identified 254 LDLT donors at our hospital. Among these, we investigated those who had newly developed psychiatric complications and required psychiatric treatment after donor operation. RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 4 years. Sixty-five donors were lost to follow-up. Eight donors (3.1%) developed postoperative psychiatric complications, including major depressive disorder in 4, panic disorder in 2, conversion disorder and panic disorder in 1, and adjustment disorder in 1. The median duration from donor surgery to psychiatric diagnosis was 104.5 days (range, 12 to 657 days) and the median treatment duration was 18 months (range, 3 to 168 months). Of those, 3 donors required psychiatric treatment over 10 years, and 4 donors remained under treatment. The duration of hospital stay after donor operation was significantly longer and perioperative complications with Clavien classification greater than grade IIIa were more frequent in donors with psychiatric complications than in those without psychiatric complications (P=0.02 and P=0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment for psychiatric disorders by psychiatrists and psychologists are important during LDLT donor follow-up. Minimization of physiological complications might be important to prevent postoperative psychiatric complications in LDLT donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Shizuku
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.,Department of Transplantation and Endocrine Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hideya Kamei
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Kimura
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Kurata
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kanta Jobara
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Yoshizawa
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kanako Ishizuka
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Aoi Okada
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shinichi Kishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Norio Ozaki
- Department of Psychiatry, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Ogura
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Goldaracena N, Jung J, Aravinthan AD, Abbey SE, Krause S, Pritlove C, Lynch J, Wright L, Selzner N, Stunguris J, Greig P, Ghanekar A, McGilvray I, Sapisochin G, Ng VL, Levy G, Cattral M, Grant D. Donor outcomes in anonymous live liver donation. J Hepatol 2019; 71:951-959. [PMID: 31279899 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Death rates on liver transplant waiting lists range from 5%-25%. Herein, we report a unique experience with 50 anonymous individuals who volunteered to address this gap by offering to donate part of their liver to a recipient with whom they had no biological connection or prior relationship, so called anonymous live liver donation (A-LLD). METHODS Candidates were screened to confirm excellent physical, mental, social, and financial health. Demographics and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Qualitative interviews after donation examined motivation and experiences. Validated self-reported questionnaires assessed personality traits and psychological impact. RESULTS A total of 50 A-LLD liver transplants were performed between 2005 and 2017. Most donors had a university education, a middle-class income, and a history of prior altruism. Half were women. Median age was 38.5 years (range 20-59). Thirty-three (70%) learned about this opportunity through public or social media. Saving a life, helping others, generativity, and reciprocity for past generosity were motivators. Social, financial, healthcare, and legal support in Canada were identified as facilitators. A-LLD identified most with the personality traits of agreeableness and conscientiousness. The median hospital stay was 6 days. One donor experienced a Dindo-Clavien Grade 3 complication that completely resolved. One-year recipient survival was 91% in 22 adults and 97% in 28 children. No A-LLD reported regretting their decision. CONCLUSIONS This is the first and only report of the characteristics, motivations and facilitators of A-LLD in a large cohort. With rigorous protocols, outcomes are excellent. A-LLD has significant potential to reduce the gap between transplant organ demand and availability. LAY SUMMARY We report a unique experience with 50 living donors who volunteered to donate to a recipient with whom they had no biological connection or prior relationship (anonymous living donors). This report is the first to discuss motivations, strategies and facilitators that may mitigate physical, social and ethical risk factors in this patient population. With rigorous protocols, anonymous liver donation and recipient outcomes are excellent; with appropriate clinical expertise and system facilitators in place, our experience suggests that other centers may consider the procedure for its significant potential to reduce the gap between transplant organ demand and availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Goldaracena
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Judy Jung
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Aloysious D Aravinthan
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; NDDC, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Susan E Abbey
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sandra Krause
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cheryl Pritlove
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Applied Health Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joanna Lynch
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Linda Wright
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stunguris
- Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul Greig
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian McGilvray
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vicky Lee Ng
- Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gary Levy
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark Cattral
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Grant
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Transplant and Regenerative Medicine Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fisher RA. Anonymous live liver donor: the Good Samaritan Stranger. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 16:650-651. [PMID: 31501587 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-019-0207-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Fisher
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Transplant Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ryu S, Yoon SC, Hong KE, Kim JM. Psychosocial Issues Related to Donor's Decision-Making in Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Ann Transplant 2019; 24:576-583. [PMID: 31624226 PMCID: PMC6820347 DOI: 10.12659/aot.916340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the detailed motives, concerns, and psychological defensiveness of living liver donor candidates in a Korean population. Material/Methods We analyzed data of 102 donor candidates obtained from routine psychosocial evaluation for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using descriptive methods. Donor candidates completed 2 questionnaires regarding their motivations and concerns, as well as a validity scale, the K scale from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. Results Donor candidates were more likely to cite family-related issues (77.5% to 94.1%) including well-being of the whole family and family affection as the reasons for their liver donation rather than personal motives (38.2% to 57.8%). Donors were also more likely to concern about the recipient’s survival and recovery (52.9% to 58.8%) rather than their own difficulties such as surgical complications and occupational disadvantages (19.6% to 38.2%). Twenty-six donors (25.5%) took a psychologically defensive attitude (T-score of K scale ≥65) during the pre-donation evaluation. Psychologically defensive donors expressed a significantly lower level of concern about liver donation compared to non-defensive donors (P<0.01). Conclusions We need to pay more attention to the family-related issues and psychological defensiveness of living liver donor candidates when evaluating psychosocial status before LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seunghyong Ryu
- Department of Mental Health Research, National Center for Mental Health, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Se Chang Yoon
- Department of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ki Eun Hong
- Department of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Male Offspring Living-related Donor Liver: Really a Matter of Concern? Transplantation 2019; 104:907-908. [PMID: 31568400 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
33
|
Abu-Gazala S, Olthoff KM. Current Status of Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States. Annu Rev Med 2019; 70:225-238. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-051517-125454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was introduced in response to the shortage of deceased donor liver grafts. The number of adult living donor transplants is increasing due to improved outcomes and increasing need. Advantages of LDLT include optimization of the timing of transplant, better organ quality, and lower rates of recipient mortality compared to staying on the wait list for deceased donor liver transplant. Donor safety remains the major focus when considering LDLT. Recent advancements have supported the increased use of LDLT to help decrease wait list death and improve long-term survival of transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Abu-Gazala
- Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
| | - Kim M. Olthoff
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4283, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Prevalence and Predictors of Patient-Reported Long-term Mental and Physical Health After Donation in the Adult-to-Adult Living-Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study. Transplantation 2018; 102:105-118. [PMID: 28885494 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospective and longitudinal studies have examined liver donors' medical outcomes beyond the first 1 to 2 years postdonation. There is no analogous longitudinal evidence on long-term psychosocial outcomes, including patient-reported clinically significant mental health problems and perceptions of physical well-being. We examined prevalence, descriptive characteristics, and predictors of diagnosable mental health conditions and self-reported physical health problems, including fatigue and pain, in the long-term years after liver donation. METHODS Donors from 9 centers who initially completed telephone interviews at 3 to 10 years postdonation (mean, 5.8 years; SD, 1.9) were reinterviewed annually for 2 years using validated measures. Outcomes were examined descriptively. Repeated-measures regression analyses evaluated potential predictors and correlates of outcomes. RESULTS Of 517 donors initially interviewed (66% of those eligible), 424 (82%) were reassessed at least once. Prevalence rates of major depression and clinically significant pain were similar to general population norms; average fatigue levels were better than norms. All prevalence rates showed little temporal change. Anxiety and alcohol use disorder rates exceeded normative rates at 1 or more assessments. Longer postdonation hospitalization, female sex, higher body mass index, concerns about donation-related health effects, and burdensome donation-related financial costs were associated with increased risk for most outcomes (P's < 0.05). Men were at higher risk for alcohol use disorder (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Anxiety and alcohol use disorders were more common than would be expected; they may warrant increased research attention and clinical surveillance. Surveillance for long-term problems in the areas assessed may be optimized by targeting donors at higher risk based on identified predictors and correlates.
Collapse
|
35
|
Butt Z, DiMartini AF, Liu Q, Simpson MA, Smith AR, Zee J, Gillespie BW, Holtzman S, Ladner D, Olthoff K, Fisher RA, Hafliger S, Freise CE, Mandell MS, Sherker AH, Dew MA. Fatigue, Pain, and Other Physical Symptoms of Living Liver Donors in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:1221-1232. [PMID: 29698577 PMCID: PMC6153054 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about living liver donors' perceptions of their physical well-being following the procedure. We collected data on donor fatigue, pain, and other relevant physical outcomes as part of the prospective, multicenter Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study consortium. A total of 271 (91%) of 297 eligible donors were interviewed at least once before donation and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after donation using validated measures when available. Repeated measures regression models were used to identify potential predictors of worse physical outcomes. We found that donors reported more fatigue immediately after surgery that improved by 2 years after donation, but not to predonation levels. A similar pattern was seen across a number of other physical outcomes. Abdominal or back pain and interference from their pain were rated relatively low on average at all study points. However, 21% of donors did report clinically significant pain at some point during postdonation study follow-up. Across multiple outcomes, female donors, donors whose recipients died, donors with longer hospital stays after surgery, and those whose families discouraged donation were at risk for worse physical well-being outcomes. In conclusion, although not readily modifiable, we have identified risk factors that may help identify donors at risk for worse physical outcomes for targeted intervention. Liver Transplantation 00 000-000 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeeshan Butt
- Departments of Medical Social Sciences, Surgery, & Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Northwestern University, Chicago IL
| | - Andrea F. DiMartini
- Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA
| | - Qian Liu
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mary Ann Simpson
- Department of Transplantation, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
| | - Abigail R. Smith
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI,Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jarcy Zee
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Susan Holtzman
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC
| | - Daniela Ladner
- Departments of Medical Social Sciences, Surgery, & Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Northwestern University, Chicago IL
| | - Kim Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert A. Fisher
- Division of Transplantation, The Transplant Institute Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | | | - Chris E. Freise
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Averell H. Sherker
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mary Amanda Dew
- Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abu-Gazala S, Olthoff KM. Status of Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation in the United States: Results from the Adult-To-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2018; 47:297-311. [PMID: 29735025 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant Cohort Study (A2ALL). The findings show that the number of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplants is consistently increasing. Living donor liver transplantation has an important benefit for patients with acute liver failure, does not compromise donor safety, and has lower rates of acute cellular rejection in biologically related donor and recipient. The conclusions from the A2ALL consortium have been critical in transplant advancement, supporting increased use to help decrease waitlist death and improve long-term survival of transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Abu-Gazala
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Unit, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Kiryat Hadassah, POB 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
| | - Kim M Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
|