1
|
Milligan C, Williams RJ, Singh TP, Bastardi HJ, Esteso P, Almond CS, Gauvreau K, Daly KP. Impact of a positive crossmatch on pediatric heart transplant outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:963-972. [PMID: 38423415 PMCID: PMC11090719 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.02.1457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric heart transplant (HT) candidates experience high waitlist mortality due to a limited donor pool that is constrained in part by anti-HLA sensitization. We evaluated the impact of CDC and Flow donor-specific crossmatch (XM) results on pediatric HT outcomes. METHODS All pediatric HTs between 1999 and 2019 in the OPTN database were included. Donor-specific XM results were sub-categorized based on CDC and Flow results. Primary outcomes were treated rejection in the first year and time to death or allograft loss. Propensity scores were utilized to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS A total of 4,695 pediatric HT patients with T-cell XM data were included. After propensity score adjustment, a positive T-cell CDC-XM was associated with 2 times higher odds of treated rejection (OR 2.29 (1.56, 3.37)) and shorter time to death/allograft loss (HR 1.50 (1.19, 1.88)) compared to a negative Flow-XM. HT recipients who were Flow-XM positive with negative/unknown CDC-XM did not have higher odds of rejection or shorter time to death/allograft loss. An isolated positive B-cell XM was also not associated with worse outcomes. Over the study period XM testing shifted from CDC- to Flow-based assays. CONCLUSIONS A positive donor-specific T-cell CDC-XM was associated with rejection and death/allograft loss following pediatric HT. This association was not observed with a positive T-cell Flow-XM or B-cell XM result alone. The shift away from performing the CDC-XM may result in loss of important prognostic information unless the clinical relevance of quantitative Flow-XM results on heart transplant outcomes is systematically studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Milligan
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan J Williams
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tajinder P Singh
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Heather J Bastardi
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul Esteso
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher S Almond
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Kimberlee Gauvreau
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin P Daly
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dipchand AI, Webber SA. Pediatric heart transplantation: Looking forward after five decades of learning. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14675. [PMID: 38062996 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Heart transplantation has become the standard of care for pediatric patients with end-stage heart disease throughout the world. Since the first transplant was performed in 1967, the number of transplants has grown dramatically with 13 449 pediatric heart transplants being reported to The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) between January 1992 and June 30, 2018. Outcomes have consistently improved over the last few decades, specifically short-term outcomes. Most recent survival data demonstrate that recipients who survive to 1-year post-transplant have excellent long-term survival with more than 60% of those who were transplanted as infants being alive 25 years later. Nonetheless, the rates of graft loss beyond the first year have remained relatively constant over time; driven primarily by our poor understanding and lack of treatments for chronic allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Acute rejection, CAV, graft failure, and infection continue to be the major causes of death within the first 5 years post-transplant. In addition, renal dysfunction, malignancy, and the need for re-transplantation remain as significant issues that require close follow-up. Looking forward, key challenges include improving donor utilization rates (including donation after cardiac death (DCD) and the use of ex vivo perfusion devices), the development of non-invasive biomarkers for rejection, efforts to mitigate the long-term effects of immunosuppression, and prevention of CAV. It is not possible to cover the entire evolution of pediatric heart transplantation over the last five decades, but in this review, we hope to touch on key observations, lessons learned, and practice changes that have advanced the field, as well as glance ahead to the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne I Dipchand
- Department of Paediatrics, Head, Heart Transplant, Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven A Webber
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Pediatrician-in-Chief, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hartje-Dunn C, Blume ED, Bastardi H, Daly KP, Fynn-Thompson F, Gauvreau K, Singh TP. Medium-term Outcomes in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients Managed Using a Steroid Avoidance Immune Suppression Protocol. Transplantation 2024; 108:e8-e14. [PMID: 37788365 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Short-term outcomes using steroid avoidance immune suppression are encouraging in pediatric heart transplant (HT) recipients at low risk of antibody-mediated rejection. We assessed medium-term outcomes in pediatric HT recipients initiated on a steroid avoidance protocol at our institution using surveillance biopsies. METHODS All primary HT recipients during 2006-2020 who did not have a donor-specific antibody were eligible for immune suppression consisting of 5-d Thymoglobulin/steroid induction followed by a tacrolimus-based, steroid-free regimen. We assessed freedom from graft failure (death or retransplant), acute rejection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. RESULTS Overall, 150 of 181 primary HT recipients were eligible for steroid avoidance regimen. Their median age was 8.7 y, 41% had congenital heart disease, 23% were sensitized, and 35% were on a mechanical support. The median follow-up was 6.1 y. Eleven patients (8%) were on maintenance steroids at discharge and 13% at 1 y. Graft survival was 94% at 1 y and 87% at 5 y. Freedom from rejection was 73% at 1 y and 64% at 5 y. Freedom from posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease was 96% at 1 y and 95% at 5 y. Freedom from moderate cardiac allograft vasculopathy was 94% at 5 y. Eight patients developed diabetes. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in 5% of the cohort at 5 y. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric HT recipients at low risk of antibody-mediated rejection have excellent medium-term survival and relatively low incidence of posttransplant morbidities when managed using a steroid avoidance immune suppression protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth D Blume
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Heather Bastardi
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kevin P Daly
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Kimberlee Gauvreau
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Tajinder P Singh
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marco I, López-Azor García JC, González Martín J, Severo Sánchez A, García-Cosío Carmena MD, Mancebo Sierra E, de Juan Bagudá J, Castrodeza Calvo J, Hernández Pérez FJ, Delgado JF. De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies after Heart Transplantation: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7474. [PMID: 38068526 PMCID: PMC10707043 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Antibodies directed against donor-specific human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) can be detected de novo after heart transplantation and play a key role in long-term survival. De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) have been associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy, antibody-mediated rejection, and mortality. Advances in detection methods and international guideline recommendations have encouraged the adoption of screening protocols among heart transplant units. However, there is still a lack of consensus about the correct course of action after dnDSA detection. Treatment is usually started when antibody-mediated rejection is present; however, some dnDSAs appear years before graft failure is detected, and at this point, damage may be irreversible. In particular, class II, anti-HLA-DQ, complement binding, and persistent dnDSAs have been associated with worse outcomes. Growing evidence points towards a more aggressive management of dnDSA. For that purpose, better diagnostic tools are needed in order to identify subclinical graft injury. Cardiac magnetic resonance, strain techniques, or coronary physiology parameters could provide valuable information to identify patients at risk. Treatment of dnDSA usually involves plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, immunoadsorption, and ritxumab, but the benefit of these therapies is still controversial. Future efforts should focus on establishing effective treatment protocols in order to improve long-term survival of heart transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Marco
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Juan Carlos López-Azor García
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Madrid, Spain; (J.C.L.-A.G.); (F.J.H.P.)
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- School of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier González Martín
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Andrea Severo Sánchez
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Esther Mancebo Sierra
- Immunology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Javier de Juan Bagudá
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- School of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Javier Castrodeza Calvo
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Juan Francisco Delgado
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
- School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Webber SA, Chin H, Wilkinson JD, Armstrong BD, Canter CE, Dipchand AI, Dodd DA, Feingold B, Lamour JM, Mahle WT, Singh TP, Zuckerman WA, Rossano JW, Morrison Y, Diop H, Demetris AJ, Bentlejewski C, Mohanakumar T, Odim J, Zeevi A. Impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibody on cardiac hemodynamics and graft function 3 years after pediatric heart transplantation: First results from the CTOTC-09 multi-institutional study. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1893-1907. [PMID: 37579817 PMCID: PMC10841212 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study (CTOTC-09) was to assess the impact of "preformed" (at transplant) donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) and first year newly detected DSA (ndDSA) on allograft function at 3 years after pediatric heart transplantation (PHTx). We enrolled children listed at 9 North American centers. The primary end point was pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at 3 years posttransplant. Of 407 enrolled subjects, 370 achieved PHTx (mean age, 7.7 years; 57% male). Pre-PHTx sensitization status was nonsensitized (n = 163, 44%), sensitized/no DSA (n = 115, 31%), sensitized/DSA (n = 87, 24%), and insufficient DSA data (n = 5, 1%); 131 (35%) subjects developed ndDSA. Subjects with any DSA had comparable PCWP at 3 years to those with no DSA. There were also no significant differences overall between the 2 groups for other invasive hemodynamic measurements, systolic graft function by echocardiography, and serum brain natriuretic peptide concentration. However, in the multivariable analysis, persistent first-year DSA was a risk factor for 3-year abnormal graft function. Graft and patient survival did not differ between groups. In summary, overall, DSA status was not associated with worse allograft function or inferior patient and graft survival at 3 years, but persistent first-year DSA was a risk factor for late graft dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Webber
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
| | - Hyunsook Chin
- Rho Federal Systems Division, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - James D Wilkinson
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Charles E Canter
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Anne I Dipchand
- Labatt Family Heart Center, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Debra A Dodd
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Brian Feingold
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jacqueline M Lamour
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - William T Mahle
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tajinder P Singh
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Warren A Zuckerman
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph W Rossano
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yvonne Morrison
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Helena Diop
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Anthony J Demetris
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carol Bentlejewski
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Jonah Odim
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lytrivi ID, Koehl D, Esteso P, Frandsen EL, Gibbons MK, Kirklin JK, Cantor R, Lamour JM, Putschoegl A, Shugh S, Williams RJ, Pearce FB. Contemporary outcomes of pediatric cardiac transplantation with a positive retrospective crossmatch. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14593. [PMID: 37602972 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A positive crossmatch (+ XM) has traditionally been associated with adverse outcomes following pediatric heart transplantation. However, more recent studies suggest that favorable intermediate-term outcomes may be achieved despite a + XM. This study's hypothesis is that children with a + XM have similar long-term survival, but higher rate of complications such as rejection, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and infection, compared to patients with a negative (-) XM. METHODS The Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Registry (PHTS) database was queried from 2010-2021 for all patients <18 years of age with a known XM. Baseline demographics were compared between + XM and - XM groups using appropriate parametric and non-parametric group comparisons. Cox Proportional Hazards Modeling was used to identify risk factors for post-transplant graft loss, rejection, and CAV. RESULTS Of 4599 pediatric heart transplants during the study period, XM results were available for 3914 (85%), of which 373 (9.5%) had a + XM. Univariate analysis showed lower 10-year survival for patients with + XM (HR = 1.3, p = .04). Multivariate analyses revealed no significant difference in 10-year survival in the 2 groups; however, time to first rejection (p = .0001) remained significantly shorter in the + XM group. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric patients transplanted across a + XM experience earlier rejection; however, after multivariate adjustment, + XM is not independently associated with intermediate-term graft loss. The risk of heart transplantation against a + XM must be balanced with the ongoing risk of waitlist mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene D Lytrivi
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Devin Koehl
- Kirklin Institute for Research in Surgical Outcomes, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Paul Esteso
- Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erik L Frandsen
- Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | | | - James K Kirklin
- Kirklin Institute for Research in Surgical Outcomes, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Ryan Cantor
- Kirklin Institute for Research in Surgical Outcomes, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jacqueline M Lamour
- Mount Sinai Medical Center, Kravis Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam Putschoegl
- Children's Hospital of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Svetlana Shugh
- Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital, Hollywood, Florida, USA
| | | | - F Bennett Pearce
- University of Alabama Pediatric Cardiology, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kamsheh AM, Canter CE. Crossing the threshold: Crossmatch-positive heart transplant is a reasonable strategy in highly sensitized pediatric patients. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14610. [PMID: 37705458 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia M Kamsheh
- Pediatric Cardiology, Childrens Pl, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Charles E Canter
- Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rao M, Amouzgar M, Harden JT, Lapasaran MG, Trickey A, Armstrong B, Odim J, Debnam T, Esquivel CO, Bendall SC, Martinez OM, Krams SM. High-dimensional profiling of pediatric immune responses to solid organ transplantation. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:101147. [PMID: 37552988 PMCID: PMC10439249 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplant remains a life-saving therapy for children with end-stage heart, lung, liver, or kidney disease; however, ∼33% of allograft recipients experience acute rejection within the first year after transplant. Our ability to detect early rejection is hampered by an incomplete understanding of the immune changes associated with allograft health, particularly in the pediatric population. We performed detailed, multilineage, single-cell analysis of the peripheral blood immune composition in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients, with high-dimensional mass cytometry. Supervised and unsupervised analysis methods to study cell-type proportions indicate that the allograft type strongly influences the post-transplant immune profile. Further, when organ-specific differences are considered, graft health is associated with changes in the proportion of distinct T cell subpopulations. Together, these data form the basis for mechanistic studies into the pathobiology of rejection and allow for the development of new immunosuppressive agents with greater specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahil Rao
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Transplant Immunology Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Meelad Amouzgar
- Immunology Graduate Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - James T Harden
- Transplant Immunology Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Immunology Graduate Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - M Gay Lapasaran
- Transplant Immunology Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Amber Trickey
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | | | - Jonah Odim
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Carlos O Esquivel
- Transplant Immunology Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Sean C Bendall
- Program in Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Olivia M Martinez
- Transplant Immunology Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Program in Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Sheri M Krams
- Transplant Immunology Lab, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Program in Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ellison M, Mangiola M, Marrari M, Bentlejewski C, Sadowski J, Zern D, Kramer CSM, Heidt S, Niemann M, Xu Q, Dipchand AI, Mahle WT, Rossano JW, Canter CE, Singh TP, Zuckerman WA, Hsu DT, Feingold B, Webber SA, Zeevi A. Immunologic risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant patients by combining HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1110292. [PMID: 36999035 PMCID: PMC10043167 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1110292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatch is a powerful biomarker of rejection. Few studies have explored its use in assessing rejection risk in heart transplant recipients. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of HLA Epitope Mismatch Algorithm (HLA-EMMA) and Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithms can improve risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant recipients. Class I and II HLA genotyping were performed by next-generation sequencing on 274 recipient/donor pairs enrolled in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children (CTOTC). Using high-resolution genotypes, we performed HLA molecular mismatch analysis with HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II, and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Patients without pre-formed donor specific antibody (DSA) (n=100) were used for correlations with post-transplant DSA and antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). Risk cut-offs were determined for DSA and ABMR using both algorithms. HLA-EMMA cut-offs alone predict the risk of DSA and ABMR; however, if used in combination with PIRCHE-II, the population could be further stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The combination of HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II enables more granular immunological risk stratification. Intermediate-risk cases, like low-risk cases, are at a lower risk of DSA and ABMR. This new way of risk evaluation may facilitate individualized immunosuppression and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Ellison
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Histocompatibility Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: M. Ellison,
| | - M. Mangiola
- Transplant Institute, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - M. Marrari
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - C. Bentlejewski
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - J. Sadowski
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Histocompatibility Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - D. Zern
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Histocompatibility Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | | - S. Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - M. Niemann
- Research and Development, PIRCHE AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - Q. Xu
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - A. I. Dipchand
- Labatt Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W. T. Mahle
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - J. W. Rossano
- Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - C. E. Canter
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - T. P. Singh
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - W. A. Zuckerman
- Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - D. T. Hsu
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, United States
| | - B. Feingold
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - S. A. Webber
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - A. Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies: A Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk consensus document. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:115-132. [PMID: 36695614 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Although anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are commonly measured in clinical practice and their relationship with transplant outcome is well established, clinical recommendations for anti-HLA antibody assessment are sparse. Supported by a careful and critical review of the current literature performed by the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 working group, this consensus report provides clinical practice recommendations in kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplantation based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The recommendations address 3 major clinical problems in transplantation and include guidance regarding posttransplant DSA assessment and application to diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics: (1) the clinical implications of positive posttransplant DSA detection according to DSA status (ie, preformed or de novo), (2) the relevance of posttransplant DSA assessment for precision diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and for treatment management, and (3) the relevance of posttransplant DSA for allograft prognosis and risk stratification. This consensus report also highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical investigations and trials in the future that will further refine the clinical utility of posttransplant DSA assessment, leading to improved transplant management and patient care.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yamamoto T, Pearson DS, Ababneh EI, Harris C, Nissaisorakarn P, Mahowald GK, Heher YK, Elias N, Markmann JF, Lewis GD, Riella LV. Case report: Successful simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation across a positive complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch. FRONTIERS IN NEPHROLOGY 2022; 2:1047217. [PMID: 37675007 PMCID: PMC10479575 DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2022.1047217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Preformed donor-specific antibodies are associated with a higher risk of rejection and worse graft survival in organ transplantation. However, in heart transplantation, the risk and benefit balance between high mortality on the waiting list and graft survival may allow the acceptance of higher immunologic risk donors in broadly sensitized recipients. Transplanting donor-recipient pairs with a positive complement dependent cytotoxic (CDC) crossmatch carries the highest risk of hyperacute rejection and immediate graft loss and is usually avoided in kidney transplantation. Herein we report the first successful simultaneous heart-kidney transplant with a T- and B-cell CDC crossmatch positive donor using a combination of rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, bortezomib and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction followed by eculizumab therapy for two months post-transplant. In the year following transplantation, both allografts maintained stable graft function (all echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fractions ≥ 65%, eGFR>60) and showed no histologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection. In addition, the patient has not developed any severe infections including cytomegalovirus or BK virus infection. In conclusion, a multitarget immunosuppressive regimen can allow for combined heart/kidney transplantation across positive CDC crossmatches without evidence of antibody-mediated rejection or significant infection. Longer follow-up will be needed to further support this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Yamamoto
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Daniel S. Pearson
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Emad I. Ababneh
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Cynthia Harris
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Grace K. Mahowald
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yael K. Heher
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Nahel Elias
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - James F. Markmann
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gregory D. Lewis
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Leonardo V. Riella
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Frandsen EL, Banker KA, Mazor RL, McMullan DM, Law YM, Kemna MS, Albers EL, Hong BJ, Friedland-Little JM. Waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of critically ill infants awaiting heart transplantation managed without ventricular assist device support. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14308. [PMID: 35587026 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infants listed for heart transplant are at high risk for waitlist mortality. While waitlist mortality for children has decreased in the current era of increased ventricular assist device use, outcomes for small infants supported by ventricular assist device remain suboptimal. We evaluated morbidity and survival in critically ill infants listed for heart transplant and managed without ventricular assist device support. METHODS Critically ill infants (requiring ≥1 inotrope and mechanical ventilation or ≥2 inotropes without mechanical ventilation) listed between 2008 and 2019 were included. During the study period, infants were managed primarily medically. Mechanical circulatory support, specifically extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, was utilized as "rescue therapy" for decompensating patients. RESULTS Thirty-two infants were listed 1A, 66% with congenital heart disease. Median age and weight at listing were 2.2 months and 4.4 kg, with 69% weighing <5 kg. At listing, 97% were mechanically ventilated, 41% on ≥2 inotropes, and 25% under neuromuscular blockade. Five patients were supported by ECMO after listing. A favorable outcome (transplant or recovery) was observed in 84%. One-year posttransplant survival was 92%. Infection was the most common waitlist complication occurring in 75%. Stroke was rare, occurring in one patient who was supported on ECMO. Renal function improved from listing to transplant, death, or recovery (eGFR 70 vs 87 ml/min/1.73m2 , p = .001). CONCLUSION A strategy incorporating a high threshold for mechanical circulatory support and acceptance of prolonged mechanical ventilation and neuromuscular blockade can achieve good survival and morbidity outcomes for critically ill infants listed for heart transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik L Frandsen
- Pediatric Cardiology, Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, California, United States
| | - Katherine A Banker
- Division of Critical Care, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert L Mazor
- Division of Critical Care, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - D Michael McMullan
- Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yuk M Law
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mariska S Kemna
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Erin L Albers
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borah J Hong
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Donovan DJ, Richmond ME, Bacha EA, Addonizio LJ, Zuckerman WA. Association between homograft tissue exposure and allosensitization prior to heart transplant in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14201. [PMID: 34889487 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical repair for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) often incorporates homograft tissue or other foreign material that can lead to allosensitization. We sought to identify the relationship between pre-sensitization prior to heart transplant and exposure to homograft tissue in CHD patients. METHODS Retrospective chart review of all CHD patients who underwent heart transplant at a major pediatric transplant center between 1/1/2011-3/31/18. Operative records determined use of homograft tissue or foreign material. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) and LuminexTM single-antigen bead (SAB) testing results were reviewed. Statistical analysis determined odds of pre-sensitization in patients exposed to homograft tissue. RESULTS Fifty-six CHD patients underwent transplant during the review period. Thirteen patients (23%) were pre-sensitized by PRA>10%. By SAB testing, 33 patients (59%) developed any anti-HLA antibody >0 MFI, 30 patients (54%) >2000 MFI, and 19 patients (34%) >6000 MFI. Patients with homografts were more likely to be pre-sensitized by PRA (OR = 7.31, p = .007), and to have developed any anti-HLA antibody at various levels, >0 (OR = 4.52, p = .034), >2000 (OR = 8.59, p = .003), and >6000 (OR = 8.50, p = .004). Of patients with homografts, those pre-sensitized by PRA had longer exposure times (9.80 vs 4.96 years, p = .025). There was no difference in exposure time with relation to pre-sensitization by SAB testing. CONCLUSIONS Previous exposure to homograft tissue appears to increase the odds of pre-sensitization by either the PRA or SAB testing. Longer exposure time to homograft tissue prior to transplant is associated with increased pre-sensitization at transplant as determined by PRA, though not by SAB testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis J Donovan
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc E Richmond
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emile A Bacha
- Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Linda J Addonizio
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Warren A Zuckerman
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mangiola M, Ellison M, Marrari M, Bentlejewski C, Sadowski J, Zern D, Niemann M, Feingold B, Webber S, Zeevi A, Dipchand AI, Lamour JM, Mahle WT, Rossano JW, Scheel JN, Singh TP, Zuckerman WA. Immunologic Risk Stratification of Pediatric Heart Transplant Patients by Combining Hlamatchmaker and PIRCHE-II. J Heart Lung Transplant 2022; 41:952-960. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
15
|
Menteer J, Goldbeck C, Herrington C, Yanni G, Emamaullee JA. Immunologic and Survival Benefits of Combined Heart-liver Transplantation in Children. Transplantation 2021; 105:e107-e108. [PMID: 34416752 PMCID: PMC8932196 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jondavid Menteer
- Heart Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Cameron Goldbeck
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Organ Transplant Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Cynthia Herrington
- Heart Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - George Yanni
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Juliet A. Emamaullee
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Abdominal Organ Transplant Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Decline of increased risk donor offers increases waitlist mortality in paediatric heart transplantation. Cardiol Young 2021; 31:1228-1237. [PMID: 34429175 DOI: 10.1017/s104795112100353x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased risk donors in paediatric heart transplantation have characteristics that may increase the risk of infectious disease transmission despite negative serologic testing. However, the risk of disease transmission is low, and refusing an IRD offer may increase waitlist mortality. We sought to determine the risks of declining an initial IRD organ offer. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a retrospective analysis of candidates waitlisted for isolated PHT using 20072017 United Network of Organ Sharing datasets. Match runs identified candidates receiving IRD offers. Competing risks analysis was used to determine mortality risk for those that declined an initial IRD offer with stratified Cox regression to estimate the survival benefit associated with accepting initial IRD offers. Overall, 238/1067 (22.3%) initial IRD offers were accepted. Candidates accepting an IRD offer were younger (7.2 versus 9.8 years, p < 0.001), more often female (50 versus 41%, p = 0.021), more often listed status 1A (75.6 versus 61.9%, p < 0.001), and less likely to require mechanical bridge to PHT (16% versus 23%, p = 0.036). At 1- and 5-year follow-up, cumulative mortality was significantly lower for candidates who accepted compared to those that declined (6% versus 13% 1-year mortality and 15% versus 25% 5-year mortality, p = 0.0033). Decline of an IRD offer was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio for mortality of 1.87 (95% CI 1.24, 2.81, p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS IRD organ acceptance is associated with a substantial survival benefit. Increasing acceptance of IRD organs may provide a targetable opportunity to decrease waitlist mortality in PHT.
Collapse
|
17
|
Fu HY, Wang YC, Tsao CI, Yu SH, Chen YS, Chou HW, Chi NH, Wang CH, Hsu RB, Huang SC, Yu HY, Chou NK. Outcome of urgent desensitization in sensitized heart transplant recipients. J Formos Med Assoc 2021; 121:969-977. [PMID: 34340891 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Sensitization, the presence of preformed anti-human antibody in recipients, restricts access to ABO-compatible donors in heart transplant. Desensitization therapy works by reducing preformed antibodies to increase the chances of a negative crossmatch or permit safe transplantation across positive crossmatch. There is no consensus regarding the desensitization protocol in cardiac patients, and the outcome of desensitization remains under debate. METHODS Twenty-five consecutive sensitized heart transplant recipients received perioperative desensitization in our institution from 2012 to 2019. One-year patient survival and graft rejection rate were analyzed and compared between sensitized recipients and non-sensitized recipients. RESULTS Within the first year after transplant, patient survival in sensitized recipients was 76%. Infection was the major cause of death. The cumulative incidence of rejection was 8% for antibody-mediated rejection and 16% for acute cellular rejection. No significant difference in 1-year survival or rejection rate could be demonstrated between sensitized and nonsensitized recipients. CONCLUSION Acceptable early outcomes in patient survival and graft rejection could be anticipated in sensitized heart transplant recipients under a perioperative algorithm using complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch- or panel-reactive antibody-directed urgent immunomodulation strategies, while infection remains the major concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsun-Yi Fu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-I Tsao
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sz-Han Yu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Sharng Chen
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Heng-Wen Chou
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nai-Hsin Chi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hsien Wang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ron-Bin Hsu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Chien Huang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsi-Yu Yu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nai-Kuan Chou
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, School of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Amdani S. Failing Fontan-heart or heart-liver transplant: The jury is (still) out? J Heart Lung Transplant 2021; 40:1020. [PMID: 34175233 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shahnawaz Amdani
- Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ubeda Tikkanen A, Berry E, LeCount E, Engstler K, Sager M, Esteso P. Rehabilitation in Pediatric Heart Failure and Heart Transplant. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:674156. [PMID: 34095033 PMCID: PMC8170027 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.674156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Survival of pediatric patients with heart failure has improved due to medical and surgical advances over the past decades. The complexity of pediatric heart transplant patients has increased as medical and surgical management for patients with congenital heart disease continues to improve. Quality of life in patients with heart failure and transplant might be affected by the impact on functional status that heart failure, heart failure complications or treatment might have. Functional areas affected might be motor, exercise capacity, feeding, speech and/or cognition. The goal of rehabilitation is to enhance and restore functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. Some of these rehabilitation interventions such as exercise training have been extensively evaluated in adults with heart failure. Literature in the pediatric population is limited yet promising. The use of additional rehabilitation interventions geared toward specific complications experienced by patients with heart failure or heart transplant are potentially helpful. The use of individualized multidisciplinary rehabilitation program that includes medical management, rehabilitation equipment and the use of physical, occupational, speech and feeding therapies can help improve the quality of life of patients with heart failure and transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Ubeda Tikkanen
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Emily Berry
- Department of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Erin LeCount
- Department of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Services, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Katherine Engstler
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Meredith Sager
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Augmentative Communication Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Paul Esteso
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Butler A, Chapman G, Johnson JN, Amodeo A, Böhmer J, Camino M, Davies RR, Dipchand AI, Godown J, Miera O, Pérez-Blanco A, Rosenthal DN, Zangwill S, Kirk R. Behavioral economics-A framework for donor organ decision-making in pediatric heart transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13655. [PMID: 31985140 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The high discard rate of pediatric donor hearts presents a major challenge for children awaiting heart transplantation. Recent literature identifies several factors that contribute to the disparities in pediatric donor heart usage, including regulatory oversight, the absence of guidelines on pediatric donor heart acceptance, and variation among transplant programs. However, a likely additional contributor to this issue are the behavioral factors influencing transplant team decisions in donor offer scenarios, a topic that has not yet been studied in detail. Behavioral economics and decision psychology provide an excellent foundation for investigating decision-making in the pediatric transplant setting, offering key insights into the behavior of transplant professionals. We conducted a systematic review of published literature in pediatric heart transplant related to behavioral economics and the psychology of decision-making. In this review, we draw on paradigms from these two domains in order to examine how existing aspects of the transplant environment, including regulatory oversight, programmatic variation, and allocation systems, may precipitate potential biases surrounding donor offer decisions. Recognizing how human decision behavior influences donor acceptance is a first step toward improving utilization of potentially viable pediatric donor hearts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jens Böhmer
- The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Ryan R Davies
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Children's Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anne I Dipchand
- Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Justin Godown
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Oliver Miera
- Department of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Richard Kirk
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Children's Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection is a major clinical challenge that limits graft survival. Various modalities of treatment have been reported in small studies in paediatric heart recipients. A novel approach is to use complement-inhibiting agents, such as eculizumab, which inhibits cleavage of C5 to C5a thereby limiting the formation of membrane attack complex and terminal complement-mediated injury of tissue-bound antibodies. This medical modality of treatment has theoretical advantages but the collective experience in its use in the solid organ transplant community remains small. We add to this experience by combining 14 cases from 6 paediatric heart centres in this descriptive study.
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Donors for pediatric heart transplantation are accepted based on variety of donor factors. There is wide variability in practice across centers and lack of evidence to guide standardized approach for some donor characteristics. This article reviews current practice and evidence for donor evaluation in pediatric heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki Singh
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Muhammad Aanish Raees
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Farhan Zafar
- The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Despite advancements in transplant immunosuppression and techniques for managing critically ill patients awaiting heart transplantation, children who are immunologically sensitized to human leukocyte antigen remain at increased risk for morbidity and mortality, both while awaiting and after heart transplant. In this review we will discuss the epidemiology of sensitization, review the immunologic basis and methods of human leukocyte antigen antibody detection, describe outcomes for sensitized pediatric transplant candidates, and consider both pre- and post-transplant management options for sensitized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik L Frandsen
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Erin L Albers
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The difficult to transplant patient: Challenges and opportunities. PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2019.101131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
25
|
Edwards JJ, Seliktar N, White R, Heron SD, Lin K, Rossano J, Monos D, Sesok-Pizzini D, O'Connor MJ. Impact and predictors of positive response to desensitization in pediatric heart transplant candidates. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38:1206-1213. [PMID: 31672220 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Desensitization, the process of reducing anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT), has unclear efficacy in pediatric HT candidates. METHODS Pediatric HT candidates listed at our institution between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Sensitization was defined as the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥ 10% with ≥ 1 a strong positive antibody. The desensitization response was defined as a ≥ 25% reduction in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for ≥ 90% of the strong positive antibodies on follow-up panel reactive antibody (PRA) testing before waitlist removal, HT, or death (data available for 13 patients). RESULTS The HT candidates were categorized as sensitized receiving desensitization therapy (ST, n = 14), sensitized not receiving therapy (SNT, n = 18), or non-sensitized (n = 55). A desensitization response was observed in 8 (62%) of the ST upon repeat PRA testing, with the ST responders receiving more doses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (8 vs 2, p < 0.05). The anti-HLA class I antibodies were particularly resistant for non-responders (p = 1.9 × 10-4). The combination of homograft and ventricular assist device was more sensitizing than either alone (p = 3.1 × 10-4). However, these sensitization risk factors did not impact the desensitization response. The ST was associated with a higher likelihood of remaining listed and a longer waitlist time without substantially impacting the HT rate, waitlist mortality, or early post-HT outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Most ST patients had a favorable response to desensitization, with a dose-dependent response observed for IVIG. The anti-HLA class likely impacts the ST response, whereas traditional sensitization risk factors had no impact on the response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J Edwards
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | | | - Rachel White
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven D Heron
- Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kimberly Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph Rossano
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Dimitri Monos
- Immunogenetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Deborah Sesok-Pizzini
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew J O'Connor
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Godown J, Kirk R, Joong A, Lal AK, McCulloch M, Peng DM, Scheel J, Davies RR, Dipchand AI, Miera O, Gossett JG. Variability in donor selection among pediatric heart transplant providers: Results from an international survey. Pediatr Transplant 2019; 23:e13417. [PMID: 31081171 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
There is considerable variability in donor acceptance practices among adult heart transplant providers; however, pediatric data are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess donor acceptance practices among pediatric heart transplant professionals. The authors generated a survey to investigate clinicians' donor acceptance practices. This survey was distributed to all members of the ISHLT Pediatric Council in April 2018. A total of 130 providers responded from 17 different countries. There was a wide range of acceptable criteria for potential donors. These included optimal donor-to-recipient weight ratio (lower limit: 50%-150%, upper limit: 120%-350%), maximum donor age (25-75 years), and minimum acceptable left ventricular EF (30%-60%). Non-US centers demonstrated less restrictive donor selection criteria and were willing to accept older donors (50 vs 35 years, P < 0.001), greater size discrepancy (upper limit weight ratio 250% vs 200%, P = 0.009), and donors with a lower EF (45% vs 50%, P < 0.001). Recipient factors were most influential in the decision to accept marginal donors including recipients requiring ECMO support, ventilator support, and highly sensitized patients with a negative XM. However, programmatic factors impacted the decision to decline marginal donors including recent programmatic mortalities and concerns for programmatic restrictions from regulatory bodies. There is significant variation in donor acceptance practices among pediatric heart transplant professionals. Standardization of donor acceptance practices through the development of a consensus statement may help to improve donor utilization and reduce waitlist mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Godown
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Richard Kirk
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Anna Joong
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ashwin K Lal
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Michael McCulloch
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Virginia Children's Hospital, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - David M Peng
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Janet Scheel
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan R Davies
- Department of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Anne I Dipchand
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Oliver Miera
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jeffrey G Gossett
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Does the Canadian allocation system for highly sensitized patients work? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2019; 24:239-244. [PMID: 31090630 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The number of sensitized heart transplant candidates is rising. Highly sensitized patients are disadvantaged because they encounter longer waiting times to heart transplant. Strategies to reduce their waiting times include waitlist prioritization and desensitization therapies. The purpose of this review is to describe the listing category for highly sensitized patients in the Canadian allocation system, examine the advantages and limitations of this strategy and provide an approach to the management of the highly sensitized patient awaiting heart transplant. RECENT FINDINGS Analysis of data from the United Network of Organ Sharing shows that the incidence of death or removal from the waitlist in patients listed for heart transplant increases as the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) increases and is independent of medical urgency. In the Canadian allocation system, patients with cPRA more than 80% have a similar incidence of death on the waitlist as less sensitized patients, suggesting they survive to be transplanted. Furthermore, prioritizing and transplanting highly sensitized patients has been associated with acceptable post-transplant outcomes. SUMMARY The Canadian allocation system prioritizes highly sensitized patients to increase equity and access to transplantation while maintaining good post-transplant outcomes. Not all highly sensitized patients can wait for an organ, even if prioritized. A pragmatic individualized approach would consider the medical stability of the patient, the likelihood of transplant with a negative crossmatch and then determine whether waitlist prioritization or desensitization is the more appropriate strategy.
Collapse
|
28
|
Dipchand AI, Webber S, Mason K, Feingold B, Bentlejewski C, Mahle WT, Shaddy R, Canter C, Blume ED, Lamour J, Zuckerman W, Diop H, Morrison Y, Armstrong B, Ikle D, Odim J, Zeevi A. Incidence, characterization, and impact of newly detected donor-specific anti-HLA antibody in the first year after pediatric heart transplantation: A report from the CTOTC-04 study. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:2163-2174. [PMID: 29442424 PMCID: PMC6092243 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Revised: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Data on the clinical importance of newly detected donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (ndDSAs) after pediatric heart transplantation are lacking despite mounting evidence of the detrimental effect of de novo DSAs in solid organ transplantation. We prospectively tested 237 pediatric heart transplant recipients for ndDSAs in the first year posttransplantation to determine their incidence, pattern, and clinical impact. One-third of patients developed ndDSAs; when present, these were mostly detected within the first 6 weeks after transplantation, suggesting that memory responses may predominate over true de novo DSA production in this population. In the absence of preexisting DSAs, patients with ndDSAs had significantly more acute cellular rejection but not antibody-mediated rejection, and there was no impact on graft and patient survival in the first year posttransplantation. Risk factors for ndDSAs included common sensitizing events. Given the early detection of the antibody response, memory responses may be more important in the first year after pediatric heart transplantation and patients with a history of a sensitizing event may be at risk even with a negative pretransplantation antibody screen. The impact on late graft and patient outcomes of first-year ndDSAs is being assessed in an extended cohort of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. I. Dipchand
- Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - S. Webber
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - B. Feingold
- Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - W. T. Mahle
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
| | - R. Shaddy
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C. Canter
- St Louis Children’s Hospital, St Louis, MO
| | | | - J. Lamour
- Montefiore Children’s Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - H. Diop
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | - J. Odim
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - A. Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zuckerman WA, Zeevi A, Mason KL, Feingold B, Bentlejewski C, Addonizio LJ, Blume ED, Canter CE, Dipchand AI, Hsu DT, Shaddy RE, Mahle WT, Demetris AJ, Briscoe DM, Mohanakumar T, Ahearn JM, Iklé DN, Armstrong BD, Morrison Y, Diop H, Odim J, Webber SA. Study rationale, design, and pretransplantation alloantibody status: A first report of Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children-04 (CTOTC-04) in pediatric heart transplantation. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:2135-2147. [PMID: 29446208 PMCID: PMC6093810 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies are associated with worse outcomes after organ transplantation. Among sensitized pediatric heart candidates, requirement for negative donor-specific cytotoxicity crossmatch increases wait times and mortality. However, transplantation with positive crossmatch may increase posttransplantation morbidity and mortality. We address this clinical challenge in a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of children listed for heart transplantation (Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children-04 [CTOTC-04]). Outcomes were compared among sensitized recipients who underwent transplantation with positive crossmatch, nonsensitized recipients, and sensitized recipients without positive crossmatch. Positive crossmatch recipients received antibody removal and augmented immunosuppression, while other recipients received standard immunosuppression with corticosteroid avoidance. This first CTOTC-04 report summarizes study rationale and design and relates pretransplantation sensitization status using solid-phase technology. Risk factors for sensitization were explored. Of 317 screened patients, 290 were enrolled and 240 underwent transplantation. Core laboratory evaluation demonstrated that more than half of patients were anti-HLA sensitized. Greater than 80% of sensitized patients had class I (with or without class II) HLA antibodies, and one-third of sensitized patients had at least 1 HLA antibody with median fluorescence intensity of ≥8000. Logistic regression models demonstrated male sex, weight, congenital heart disease history, prior allograft, and ventricular assist device are independent risk factors for sensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Warren A. Zuckerman
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbia University Medical
Center, New York, NY
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,
Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Brian Feingold
- Department of Pediatrics and Clinical and Translational Science,
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Carol Bentlejewski
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,
Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Linda J. Addonizio
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbia University Medical
Center, New York, NY
| | - Elizabeth D. Blume
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Boston Children’s
Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Charles E. Canter
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University School of
Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Anne I. Dipchand
- Labatt Family Heart Center, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for
Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daphne T. Hsu
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital at
Montefiore, Bronx, NY
| | - Robert E. Shaddy
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William T. Mahle
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Healthcare of
Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
| | - Anthony J. Demetris
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center,
Pittsburgh, PA
| | - David M. Briscoe
- Transplant Research Program, Division of Pediatric Nephrology,
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Joseph M. Ahearn
- Department of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh,
PA
| | - David N. Iklé
- Rho Federal Systems Division, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Yvonne Morrison
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Helena Diop
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jonah Odim
- Transplantation Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Steven A. Webber
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Monroe Carrell Jr.
Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|