1
|
Assadiasl S, Nicknam MH. Intestinal transplantation: Significance of immune responses. Arab J Gastroenterol 2024; 25:330-337. [PMID: 39289083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajg.2024.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
Intestinal allografts, with many resident immune cells and as a destination for circulating lymphocytes of the recipient, appear to be the most challenging solid organ transplants. The high incidence of acute rejection and frequent reports of fatal graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after intestinal transplantation call for more research to describe the molecular mechanisms involved in the immunopathogenesis of post-transplant complications to define new therapeutic targets. In addition, according to the rapid development of immunosuppressive agents, it is time to consider novel therapeutic approaches in managing treatment-refractory patients with rejection or severe GvHD. Herein, the main immunological challenges before and after intestinal transplant including, brain-dead donor inflammation, acute rejection, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejections, as well as GvHD have been described. Besides, the new immune-based therapies used in experimental and clinical settings to improve tolerance toward intestinal allograft, and cases of operational tolerance have been reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Assadiasl
- Molecular Immunology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Iranian Tissue Bank and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Mohammad Hossein Nicknam
- Molecular Immunology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okamoto T, Ogawa E, Okajima H, Masano Y, Okumura S, Yamamoto M, Uebayashi EY, Suga T, Hiejima E, Yamamoto S, Haga H, Ito T, Hatano E. Deceased donor non-composite split liver and intestinal transplantation for children. Surg Today 2024:10.1007/s00595-024-02923-w. [PMID: 39168880 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02923-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Children with intestinal failure suffer liver damage associated with parenteral nutrition: a condition known as intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), which requires transplantation of both liver and intestine. In many countries, simultaneous transplantation of these two organs is performed using grafts from a deceased donor, but there have been no such cases in Japan, and the details of the procedure are not clear. Recently, we performed simultaneous split liver and intestinal transplantation in two premature infants with IFALD, using organs from identical deceased donors and achieved good results. These are the first two cases of this procedure being performed in Japan. We report these cases and discuss the important aspects of the surgical and perioperative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Okamoto
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Eri Ogawa
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Hideaki Okajima
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kanazawa, 920-0265, Japan
| | - Yuki Masano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Shinya Okumura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Miki Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Elena Yukie Uebayashi
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takenori Suga
- Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Eitaro Hiejima
- Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Shuji Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Hironori Haga
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takashi Ito
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ameyaw PA, Boateng S, Annor EN, Njei B. Impact of Recipient and Donor Body Mass Index on Survival Outcomes After Intestinal Transplantation: A United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis. Ann Transplant 2024; 29:e943994. [PMID: 38978263 PMCID: PMC11299477 DOI: 10.12659/aot.943994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term patient survival after intestinal transplantation (IT) remains low compared with other organ transplants despite years of advancement in clinical experience. While patients with extremely high or low body mass index (BMI) are often considered ineligible for IT, the impact of BMI on post-transplant IT survival remains understudied. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent IT between April 11, 1994, and September 29, 2021. We assessed the association of recipient and donor BMI at transplant with post-transplant mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS A total of 1541 patients were included in our final sample. Of these patients, 806 were females (52.5%) and most were in the normal-weight BMI subgroup (54.2%). Obese class II (mean; 36.8±10.92 years) and underweight patients (mean; 37.6±13.37 years) were significantly younger than patients in other BMI categories. The adjusted multivariate model demonstrated an increased risk of mortality in underweight IT recipients compared to normal-weight IT recipients (aHR=1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.54; P=0.032).There was no significant association between donor BMI categories and survival in IT recipients. CONCLUSIONS Recipient BMI below normal is associated with an increased risk of mortality after intestinal transplantation and represents a potentially modifiable patient characteristic to improve survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prince Addo Ameyaw
- Department of Medicine, Bridgeport Hospital/Yale New Haven Health, Bridgeport, CT, USA
| | - Sarpong Boateng
- Department of Medicine, Bridgeport Hospital/Yale New Haven Health, Bridgeport, CT, USA
| | - Eugene N. Annor
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, IL, USA
| | - Basile Njei
- Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paulo Guzman J, Maklad M, Osman M, Elsherif A, Fujiki M. Updates in induction immunosuppression regimens for intestinal transplantation. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110800. [PMID: 38599892 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johann Paulo Guzman
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mohamed Maklad
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mohammed Osman
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ayat Elsherif
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Belyayev L, Kang J, Sadat M, Loh K, Patil D, Muralidaran V, Khan K, Kaufman S, Subramanian S, Gusev Y, Bhuvaneshwar K, Ressom H, Varghese R, Ekong U, Matsumoto CS, Robson SC, Fishbein TM, Kroemer A. Suppressor T helper type 17 cell responses in intestinal transplant recipients with allograft rejection. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110773. [PMID: 38494386 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intestinal transplant (ITx) rejection is associated with memory T helper type 17 cell (Th17) infiltration of grafted tissues. Modulation of Th17 effector cell response is facilitated by T regulatory (Treg) cells, but a phenotypic characterization of this process is lacking in the context of allograft rejection. METHODS Flow cytometry was performed to examine the expression of surface receptors, cytokines, and transcription factors in Th17 and Treg cells in ITx control (n = 34) and rejection patients (n = 23). To elucidate key pathways guiding the rejection biology, we utilized RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and assessed epigenetic stability through pyrosequencing of the Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR). RESULTS We found that intestinal allograft rejection is characterized by Treg cellular infiltrates, which are polarized toward Th17-type chemokine receptor, ROR-γt transcription factor expression, and cytokine production. These Treg cell subsets have maintained epigenetic stability, as defined by FoxP3-TSDR methylation status, but displayed upregulation of functional Treg and purinergic signaling genes by RNAseq analysis such as CD39, in keeping with suppressor Th17 properties. CONCLUSION We show that ITx rejection is associated with increased polarized cells that express a Th17-like phenotype concurrent with regulatory purinergic markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonid Belyayev
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Jiman Kang
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Mohammed Sadat
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Katrina Loh
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Digvijay Patil
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Vinona Muralidaran
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Khalid Khan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Stuart Kaufman
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Sukanya Subramanian
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Yuriy Gusev
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University Medical Center, 2115 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 110, Washington, DC 20075, USA
| | - Krithika Bhuvaneshwar
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University Medical Center, 2115 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 110, Washington, DC 20075, USA
| | - Habtom Ressom
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20008, USA
| | - Rency Varghese
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20008, USA
| | - Udeme Ekong
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Cal S Matsumoto
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Simon C Robson
- Center for Inflammation Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Thomas M Fishbein
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Alexander Kroemer
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gondolesi GE. History of clinical intestinal transplantation. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110788. [PMID: 38519405 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
The intestines have been considered the "forbidden organ" for years, and intestinal failure became the last organ failure recognized as such in the medical field. The impossibility of providing adequate nutritional support, turned these patients into recipients of just palliative comfort. In the 1960's, parenteral nutrition appeared as the most reasonable replacement therapy, but the initial success obtained with clinical kidney, heart, liver, lung and pancreas transplantation served as background to explore intestinal transplantation. The first clinical report of an isolated intestinal transplant was done by Richard Lillihei in 1967; in 1983, Thomas Starzl, performed the first multi visceral transplant, and in 1990, David Grant performed the first combined liver-intestinal transplant in an adult recipient in Canada. Since then, advances in immunosuppressive therapies and surgical innovations have allowed not only a continuous increase in indications, but also a worldwide application of all procedures, bringing clinical intestinal transplantation to reality. In this historical account, the most important contributions have been summarized, thus describing the steady progress, expansion and novelties developed over the last 56 years, since the first attempt. Clinical intestinal transplantation remains a complex and evolving field; ongoing research and technological advancements will continue shaping its future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel E Gondolesi
- Chief of General Surgery, Chief of Liver, Intestine and Pancreas Transplant, Hospital Universitario, Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garcia J, Oltean M, Rumbo C, Sharkey L, Kaufman SS, Ramos Boluda E, Gupte G, Martinez M, Moon J, Raghu V, Segovia MC, Sudan D, Talbotec C, Varkey J, Gondolesi GE, Mazariegos G, Venick R. Endoscopic Surveillance of the Intestinal Allograft: Recommendations From the Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Association Working Group. Transplantation 2024; 108:827-835. [PMID: 37723639 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal transplant (ITx) rejection lacks a reliable noninvasive biomarker and rejection surveillance relies on serial endoscopies and mucosal biopsies followed by histologic assessment. Endoscopic biopsies are also essential for identifying other ITx-related complications such as infectious, allergic, and inflammatory graft enteritis as well as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease or graft versus host disease. In spite of its central role in ITx, published guidelines on endoscopy and biopsy are lacking and significant variability between centers in terms of timing and technical performance exists. Therefore, an international expert group convened and discussed several aspects related to the surveillance endoscopy after ITx with the aim to summarize and standardize its practice. This article summarizes these considerations on endoscopic ITx monitoring and highlights practices of surveillance and for-cause endoscopy, biopsy techniques, pathologic evaluation, potential risks and complications, outsourcing, and less-invasive monitoring techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Garcia
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Mihai Oltean
- Sahlgrenska Intestinal Failure and Transplant Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carolina Rumbo
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lisa Sharkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Intestinal Failure and Intestinal/Multivisceral Transplant, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Girish Gupte
- Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mercedes Martinez
- Center for Liver Disease and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jang Moon
- Recanati Miller Transplantation Institute, New York, NY
| | - Vikram Raghu
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | - Cécile Talbotec
- Pediatric Gastroenterology-Hepatology-Nutrition, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Jonas Varkey
- Sahlgrenska Intestinal Failure and Transplant Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - George Mazariegos
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Madhav A, Bousfield R, Pereira-Dias J, Cormie C, Forrest S, Keane J, Kermack L, Higginson E, Dougan G, Spiers H, Massey D, Sharkey L, Rutter C, Woodward J, Russell N, Amin I, Butler A, Atkinson K, Dymond T, Bartholdson Scott J, Baker S, Gkrania-Klotsas E. A metagenomic prospective cohort study on gut microbiome composition and clinical infection in small bowel transplantation. Gut Microbes 2024; 16:2323232. [PMID: 38439546 PMCID: PMC10936650 DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2323232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Two-thirds of small-bowel transplantation (SBT) recipients develop bacteremia, with the majority of infections occurring within 3 months post-transplant. Sepsis-related mortality occurs in 31% of patients and is commonly caused by bacteria of gut origin, which are thought to translocate across the implanted organ. Serial post-transplant surveillance endoscopies provide an opportunity to study whether the composition of the ileal and colonic microbiota can predict the emergence as well as the pathogen of subsequent clinical infections in the SBT patient population. Five participants serially underwent aspiration of ileal and colonic bowel effluents at transplantation and during follow-up endoscopy either until death or for up to 3 months post-SBT. We performed whole-metagenome sequencing (WMS) of 40 bowel effluent samples and compared the results with clinical infection episodes. Microbiome composition was concordant between participants and timepoint-matched ileal and colonic samples. Four out of five (4/5) participants had clinically significant infections thought to be of gut origin. Bacterial translocation from the gut was observed in 3/5 patients with bacterial infectious etiologies. In all three cases, the pathogens had demonstrably colonized the gut between 1-10 days prior to invasive clinical infection. Recipients with better outcomes received donor grafts with higher alpha diversity. There was an increase in the number of antimicrobial resistance genes associated with longer hospital stay for all participants. This metagenomic study provides preliminary evidence to support the pathogen translocation hypothesis of gut-origin sepsis in the SBT cohort. Ileal and colonic microbiome compositions were concordant; therefore, fecal metagenomic analysis could be a useful surveillance tool for impeding infection with specific gut-residing pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Madhav
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rachel Bousfield
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joana Pereira-Dias
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Claire Cormie
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sally Forrest
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jacqueline Keane
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Leanne Kermack
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ellen Higginson
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gordon Dougan
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Harry Spiers
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Dunecan Massey
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lisa Sharkey
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charlotte Rutter
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeremy Woodward
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neil Russell
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irum Amin
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Butler
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kayleigh Atkinson
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tom Dymond
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Josefin Bartholdson Scott
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen Baker
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas
- Department of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hussan E, Kroemer A, Elsabbagh AM, Khan KM, Yazigi NA, Ekong UD, Subramanian S, Ghobrial SS, Guerra JF, Fishbein TM, Matsumoto CS, Kaufman SS. Idiopathic Ileal Ulceration After Intestinal Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1529. [PMID: 37899780 PMCID: PMC10602531 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Idiopathic ileal ulceration after intestinal transplantation (ITx) has been discussed infrequently and has an uncertain natural history and relation to graft rejection. Herein, we review our experience with this pathology. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 225 ITx in 217 patients with minimum 1 y graft survival. Routine graft endoscopy was conducted up to twice weekly within the first 90 d after ITx, gradually decreasing to once yearly. Risks for ulceration over time were evaluated using Cox regression. Results Of 93 (41%) patients with ulcers, 50 were found within 90 d after ITx mostly via ileoscopy; delayed healing after biopsy appeared causal in the majority. Of the remaining 43 patients with ulcers found >90 d after ITx, 36 were after ileostomy closure. Multivariable modeling demonstrated within 90-d ulcer associations with increasing patient age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.027; P < 0.001) and loop ileostomy (versus Santulli ileostomy; HR, 0.271; P < 0.001). For ulcers appearing after ileostomy closure, their sole association was with absence of graft colon (HR, 7.232; P < 0.001). For ulcers requiring extended anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory therapy, associations included de novo donor-specific antibodies (HR, 3.222; P < 0.007) and nucleotide oligomerization domain mutations (HR, 2.772; P < 0.016). Whole-cohort post-ITx ulceration was not associated with either graft rejection (P = 0.161) or graft failure (P = 0.410). Conclusions Idiopathic ulceration after ITx is relatively common but has little independent influence on outcome; risks include ileostomy construction, colon-free ITx, immunologic mutation, and donor sensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsadig Hussan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Alexander Kroemer
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Ahmed M. Elsabbagh
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Department of Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Khalid M. Khan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Nada A. Yazigi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Udeme D. Ekong
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Sukanya Subramanian
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | | | - Juan-Francisco Guerra
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas M. Fishbein
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Cal S. Matsumoto
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Stuart S. Kaufman
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weiner J, Llore N, Ormsby D, Fujiki M, Segovia MC, Obri M, Jafri SM, Liggett J, Kroemer AH, Matsumoto C, Moon J, Di Cocco P, Selvaggi G, Garcia J, Ganoza A, Khanna A, Mazariegos G, Wendel D, Reyes J. The First Collective Examination of Immunosuppressive Practices Among American Intestinal Transplant Centers. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1512. [PMID: 37636483 PMCID: PMC10455426 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Unlike other solid organs, no standardized treatment algorithms exist for intestinal transplantation (ITx). We established a consortium of American ITx centers to evaluate current practices. Methods All American centers performing ITx during the past 3 y were invited to participate. As a consortium, we generated questions to evaluate and collect data from each institution. The data were compiled and analyzed. Results Ten centers participated, performing 211 ITx during the past 3 y (range, 3-46; mean 21.1). Induction regimens varied widely. Thymoglobulin was the most common, used in the plurality of patients (85/211; 40.3%), but there was no consensus regimen. Similarly, regimens for the treatment of acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and graft-versus-host disease varied significantly between centers. We also evaluated differences in maintenance immunosuppression protocols, desensitization regimens, mammalian target of rapamycin use, antimetabolite use, and posttransplantation surveillance practices. Maintenance tacrolimus levels, stoma presence, and scoping frequency were not associated with differences in rejection events. Definitive association between treatments and outcomes, including graft and patient survival, was not the intention of this initial collaboration and is prevented by the lack of patient-level data and the presence of confounders. However, we identified trends regarding rejection episodes after various induction strategies that require further investigation in our subsequent collaborations. Conclusions This initial collaboration reveals the extreme heterogeneity of practices among American ITx centers. Future collaboration will explore patient-level data, stratified by age and transplant type (isolated intestine versus multivisceral), to explore the association between treatment regimens and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Weiner
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nathaly Llore
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Dylan Ormsby
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Mark Obri
- Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | | | | | | | - Cal Matsumoto
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Jang Moon
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Gennaro Selvaggi
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Jennifer Garcia
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL
| | - Armando Ganoza
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ajai Khanna
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - George Mazariegos
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Danielle Wendel
- Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Washington Medical Center/Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | - Jorge Reyes
- Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Washington Medical Center/Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zorzetti N, Marino IR, Sorrenti S, Navarra GG, D'Andrea V, Lauro A. Small bowel transplant - novel indications and recent progress. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:677-690. [PMID: 37264646 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2221433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advances in the management of intestinal failure have led to a reduction in the number of intestinal transplants. The number of bowel transplants has been mainly stable even though a slight increase has been observed in the last 5 years. AREAS COVERED Standard indication includes patients with a reasonable life expectancy. Recent progress can be deduced by the increased number of intestine transplants in adults: this is due to the continuous improvement of 1-year graft survival worldwide (without differences in 3- and 5-year) associated with better abdominal wall closure techniques. This review aims to provide an update on new indications and changes in trends of pediatric and adult intestine transplantation. This analysis, which stretches through the past 5 years, is based on a collection of related manuscripts from PubMed. EXPERT COMMENTARY Intestinal transplants should be solely intended for a group of individuals for whom indications for transplantation are clear and both medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed. Nevertheless, many protocols developed over the years have not yet solved the key question represented by the over-immunosuppression. Novel indications and recent progress in the bowel transplant field, minimal yet consistent, represent a pathway to be followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemi Zorzetti
- General Surgery, Ospedale Civile "A. Costa", Alto Reno Terme, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Sorrenti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Vito D'Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Augusto Lauro
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gaynor JJ, Tabbara MM, Ciancio G, Selvaggi G, Garcia J, Tekin A, Vianna R. The Importance Of Avoiding Time-Dependent Bias When Testing The Prognostic Value Of An Intervening Event - Two Acute Cellular Rejection Examples In Intestinal Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2023:S1600-6135(23)00308-8. [PMID: 36871628 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
In testing the prognostic value of the occurrence of an intervening event (clinical event that occurs post-transplant), 3 proper statistical methodologies for testing its prognostic value exist (time dependent covariate, landmark, and semi-Markov modelling methods). However, time-dependent bias has appeared in many clinical reports, whereby the intervening event is statistically treated as a baseline variable (as if it occurred at transplant). Using a single-center cohort of 445 intestinal transplant cases to test the prognostic value of 1st acute cellular rejection (ACR) and severe (grade of) ACR on the hazard rate of developing graft loss, we demonstrate how the inclusion of such time-dependent bias can lead to severe underestimation of the true hazard ratio (HR). The (statistically more powerful) time dependent covariate method in Cox's multivariable model yielded significantly unfavorable effects of 1st ACR (P<.0001; HR=2.492) and severe ACR (P<.0001; HR=4.531). In contrast, when using the time-dependent biased approach, multivariable analysis yielded an incorrect conclusion for the prognostic value of 1st ACR (P=.31, HR=0.877, 35.2% of 2.492) and a much smaller estimated effect of severe ACR (P=.0008; HR=1.589; 35.1% of 4.531). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance of avoiding time-dependent bias when testing the prognostic value of an intervening event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Gaynor
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL.
| | - Marina M Tabbara
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Gaetano Ciancio
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Gennaro Selvaggi
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Jennifer Garcia
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Akin Tekin
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| | - Rodrigo Vianna
- Miami Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu G, Liu C, Ma N, Zhou X, Zhao L, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liang T. Successful combined auxiliary partial liver and intestinal transplantation in two highly sensitized, cross-match positive patients. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14865. [PMID: 36416299 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) creates an immunological barrier to intestinal transplantation (ITx). Current desensitization therapies are limited and ineffective in the most highly sensitized patients. A co-transplanted whole liver transplant can protect a kidney, heart, or intestinal allograft from antibody-mediated injury. Whether an auxiliary partial liver allograft provides effective protection for highly sensitized intestinal transplant recipients is unknown. METHODS Two patients with strong HLA donor-specific antibody at high titer against their deceased donors underwent combined auxiliary partial liver and ITx across a positive cross-match. The left lateral lobes from the combined-graft recipients and the right liver lobes from the deceased donors were transplanted as a domino procedure to other four patients. RESULTS Two combined-graft recipients have had an uneventful postoperative course without major complications at a 12- and 24-month follow-up, respectively. Intestinal graft function has been excellent with no evidence of humoral or cellular rejection. While a positive cross-match turned negative, titers of donor-specific HLA antibodies gradually declined over time after transplant. The left liver lobes procured from the combined-graft recipients were successfully transplanted into two pediatric patients (age 1.9, 2.4 years) and the right lobes from two deceased donors were successfully transplanted into two adult patients. All transplant procedures went well, without post-operative complications related to the splitting technique. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that an auxiliary liver transplant can effectively protect a co-transplanted intestinal allograft against rejection and suggest that this combined procedure may serve as a useful therapeutic adjunct for a highly sensitized intestinal transplant candidate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guosheng Wu
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chaoxu Liu
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Nan Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xile Zhou
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Long Zhao
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuntao Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wentong Zhang
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang University Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen CB, Chugh S, Fujiki M, Radhakrishnan K. Overview of Physical, Neurocognitive, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Pediatric Intestinal Failure and Transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2022; 24:145-155. [PMID: 36040624 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-022-00848-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Intestinal failure and transplantation may significantly impact physical, neurocognitive, and psychosocial development in pediatric patients. Currently, there is a paucity of literature on the effects of intestinal failure and transplantation on these aspects of development. This article will review the current literature and discuss the short and long-term impacts as well as interventions to improve clinical outcomes in children with intestinal failure or those undergoing transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS Psychological disorders, neurodevelopmental delay, and social maladaptation are frequently encountered in this patient population. While the main focus is often on medical management, equal emphasis should be placed on other aspects of development such as increasing social support and improving school performance. The transition to adulthood also presents many obstacles for patients and healthcare providers should anticipate challenges such as childbirth, employment, and raising a family. The pre-operative, perioperative, and post-operative periods all represent opportunities for medical intervention. Frequent monitoring of physical, psychosocial, and neurocognitive status helps to improve clinical outcomes and long-term quality of life. Future research should emphasize continued development of multidisciplinary programs and specialized services to help address the physical and psychosocial needs of children with intestinal failure as well as transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles B Chen
- Department of Child Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, 400 N. Keene St, 65201, Columbia, MO, USA.
| | - Shreeya Chugh
- Department of Child Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, 400 N. Keene St, 65201, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Masato Fujiki
- Center for Gut Rehabilitation and Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, 44195, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kadakkal Radhakrishnan
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, 44195, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dogra H, Hind J. Innovations in Immunosuppression for Intestinal Transplantation. Front Nutr 2022; 9:869399. [PMID: 35782951 PMCID: PMC9241336 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.869399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
It has been 57 years since the first intestinal transplant. An increased incidence of graft rejection has been described compared to other solid organ transplants due to high immunogenicity of the bowel, which in health allows the balance between of dietary antigen with defense against pathogens. Expanding clinical experience, knowledge of gastrointestinal physiology and immunology have progress post-transplant immunosuppressive drug regimens. Current regimes aim to find the window between prevention of rejection and the risk of infection (the leading cause of death) and malignancy. The ultimate aim is to achieve graft tolerance. In this review we discuss advances in mucosal immunology and technologies informing the development of new anti-rejection strategies with the hope of improved survival in the next generation of transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Graft Versus Host Disease After Intestinal Transplantation: A Single-center Experience. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e731. [PMID: 34291153 PMCID: PMC8291352 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is an uncommon but highly morbid complication of intestinal transplantation (ITx). In this study, we reviewed our 17-y experience with GVHD focusing on factors predicting GVHD occurrence and survival. Methods. Retrospective review of 271 patients who received 1 or more ITx since program inception in 2003 with survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Results. Of 271 patients, 28 developed GHVD 34 (18–66) d after ITx presenting with rash or rash with fever in 26, rectosigmoid disease in 1, and hemolysis in 1; other sites, mainly rectosigmoid colon, were involved in 13. Initial skin biopsy demonstrated classic findings in 6, compatible findings in 14, and no abnormalities in 2. Additional sites of GVHD later emerged in 14. Of the 28 patients, 16 died largely from sepsis, the only independent hazard for death (hazard ratio [HR], 37.4181; P = 0.0008). Significant (P < 0.0500) independent hazards for occurrence of GVHD in adults were pre-ITx functional intestinal failure (IF) (HR, 15.2448) and non-IF diagnosis (HR, 20.9952) and early post-ITx sirolimus therapy (HR, 0.0956); independent hazards in children were non-IF diagnosis (HR, 4.3990), retransplantation (HR, 4.6401), donor:recipient age ratio (HR, 7.3190), and graft colon omission (HR, 0.1886). Variant transplant operation was not an independent GVHD hazard. Conclusions. Initial diagnosis of GVHD after ITx remains largely clinical, supported but not often confirmed by skin biopsy. Although GVHD risk is mainly recipient-driven, changes in donor selection and immunosuppression practice may reduce incidence and improve survival.
Collapse
|
17
|
Fukai M, Nakayabu T, Ohtani S, Shibata K, Shimada S, Sakamoto S, Fuda H, Furukawa T, Watanabe M, Hui SP, Chiba H, Shimamura T, Taketomi A. The Phenolic Antioxidant 3,5-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl Alcohol (DHMBA) Prevents Enterocyte Cell Death under Oxygen-Dissolving Cold Conditions through Polyphyletic Antioxidant Actions. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10091972. [PMID: 34064340 PMCID: PMC8124816 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cold preservation in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is not enough to maintain the viability of the small intestine, due to the oxidative stress. The novel phenolic antioxidant 3,5-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl alcohol (DHMBA) has dual properties to reduce oxidative stress, radical scavenging, and antioxidant protein induction, in other cells. This study was designed to determine whether DHMBA reduces cold preservation injury of enterocytes, and to identify the effector site. Enterocytes were subjected to 48-h cold preservation under atmosphere in UW solution (±DHMBA), and then returned to normal culture to replicate reperfusion of the small intestine after cold preservation. At the end of cold preservation (ECP) and at 1, 3, 6, and 72 h after rewarming (R1h, R3h, R6h, and R72h), we evaluated cell function and the injury mechanism. The results showed that DHMBA protected mitochondrial function mainly during cold preservation, and suppressed cell death after rewarming, as shown by the MTT, ATP, mitochondrial membrane potential, LDH, and lipid peroxidation assays, together with enhanced survival signals (PI3K, Akt, p70S6K) and induction of antioxidant proteins (HO-1, NQO-1, TRX-1). We found that DHMBA mitigates the cold-induced injury of enterocytes by protecting the mitochondria through direct and indirect antioxidative activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moto Fukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Nishi 7, Kita 15, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan; (T.N.); (S.O.); (K.S.); (S.S.); (S.S.); (A.T.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-11-7065927; Fax: +81-11-7177515
| | - Takuya Nakayabu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Nishi 7, Kita 15, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan; (T.N.); (S.O.); (K.S.); (S.S.); (S.S.); (A.T.)
| | - Shintaro Ohtani
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Nishi 7, Kita 15, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan; (T.N.); (S.O.); (K.S.); (S.S.); (S.S.); (A.T.)
| | - Kengo Shibata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Nishi 7, Kita 15, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan; (T.N.); (S.O.); (K.S.); (S.S.); (S.S.); (A.T.)
| | - Shingo Shimada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Nishi 7, Kita 15, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan; (T.N.); (S.O.); (K.S.); (S.S.); (S.S.); (A.T.)
| | - Soudai Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Nishi 7, Kita 15, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan; (T.N.); (S.O.); (K.S.); (S.S.); (S.S.); (A.T.)
| | - Hirotoshi Fuda
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Nishi5, Kita12, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Hokkaido, Japan; (H.F.); (T.F.); (M.W.); (S.-P.H.); (H.C.)
| | - Takayuki Furukawa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Nishi5, Kita12, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Hokkaido, Japan; (H.F.); (T.F.); (M.W.); (S.-P.H.); (H.C.)
| | - Mitsugu Watanabe
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Nishi5, Kita12, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Hokkaido, Japan; (H.F.); (T.F.); (M.W.); (S.-P.H.); (H.C.)
- Watanabe Oyster Laboratory Co. Ltd., 490-3, Shimoongata-cho, Hachioji 190-0154, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shu-Ping Hui
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Nishi5, Kita12, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Hokkaido, Japan; (H.F.); (T.F.); (M.W.); (S.-P.H.); (H.C.)
| | - Hitoshi Chiba
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Nishi5, Kita12, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0812, Hokkaido, Japan; (H.F.); (T.F.); (M.W.); (S.-P.H.); (H.C.)
- Department of Nutrition, Sapporo University of Health Sciences, 1-15, 2 chome, Nakanumanishi4jou, Higashi-ku, Sapporo 007-0894, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Shimamura
- Division of Organ Transplantation, Central Clinical Facilities, Hokkaido University Hospital, Nishi5 Kita14, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8648, Hokkaido, Japan;
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Nishi 7, Kita 15, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan; (T.N.); (S.O.); (K.S.); (S.S.); (S.S.); (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Weiner J, Svetlicky N, Kang J, Sadat M, Khan K, Duttargi A, Stovroff M, Moturi S, Kara Balla A, Hyang Kwon D, Kallakury B, Hawksworth J, Subramanian S, Yazigi N, Kaufman S, Pasieka HB, Matsumoto CS, Robson SC, Pavletic S, Zasloff M, Fishbein TM, Kroemer A. CD69+ resident memory T cells are associated with graft-versus-host disease in intestinal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1878-1892. [PMID: 33226726 PMCID: PMC10364625 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a common, morbid complication after intestinal transplantation (ITx) with poorly understood pathophysiology. Resident memory T cells (TRM ) are a recently described CD69+ memory T cell subset localizing to peripheral tissue. We observed that T effector memory cells (TEM ) in the blood increase during GvHD and hypothesized that they derive from donor graft CD69+TRM migrating into host blood and tissue. To probe this hypothesis, graft and blood lymphocytes from 10 ITx patients with overt GvHD and 34 without were longitudinally analyzed using flow cytometry. As hypothesized, CD4+ and CD8+CD69+TRM were significantly increased in blood and grafts of GvHD patients, alongside higher cytokine and activation marker expression. The majority of CD69+TRM were donor derived as determined by multiplex immunostaining. Notably, CD8/PD-1 was significantly elevated in blood prior to transplantation in patients who later had GvHD, and percentages of HLA-DR, CD57, PD-1, and naïve T cells differed significantly between GvHD patients who died vs. those who survived. Overall, we demonstrate that (1) there were significant increases in TEM at the time of GvHD, possibly of donor derivation; (2) donor TRM in the graft are a possible source; and (3) potential biomarkers for the development and prognosis of GvHD exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Weiner
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Nina Svetlicky
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Jiman Kang
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Mohammed Sadat
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Khalid Khan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Anju Duttargi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Merrill Stovroff
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Sangeetha Moturi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Abdalla Kara Balla
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Dong Hyang Kwon
- Department of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Bhaskar Kallakury
- Department of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Jason Hawksworth
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.,Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sukanya Subramanian
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Nada Yazigi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Stuart Kaufman
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Helena B Pasieka
- Division of Dermatology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Cal S Matsumoto
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Simon C Robson
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven Pavletic
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Michael Zasloff
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Thomas M Fishbein
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Alexander Kroemer
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kroemer A, Belyayev L, Khan K, Loh K, Kang J, Duttargi A, Dhani H, Sadat M, Aguirre O, Gusev Y, Bhuvaneshwar K, Kallakury B, Cosentino C, Houlihan B, Diaz J, Moturi S, Yazigi N, Kaufman S, Subramanian S, Hawksworth J, Girlanda R, Robson SC, Matsumoto CS, Zasloff M, Fishbein TM. Rejection of intestinal allotransplants is driven by memory T helper type 17 immunity and responds to infliximab. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1238-1254. [PMID: 32882110 PMCID: PMC8049508 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation (ITx) can be life-saving for patients with advanced intestinal failure experiencing complications of parenteral nutrition. New surgical techniques and conventional immunosuppression have enabled some success, but outcomes post-ITx remain disappointing. Refractory cellular immune responses, immunosuppression-linked infections, and posttransplant malignancies have precluded widespread ITx application. To shed light on the dynamics of ITx allograft rejection and treatment resistance, peripheral blood samples and intestinal allograft biopsies from 51 ITx patients with severe rejection, alongside 37 stable controls, were analyzed using immunohistochemistry, polychromatic flow cytometry, and reverse transcription-PCR. Our findings inform both immunomonitoring and treatment. In terms of immunomonitoring, we found that while ITx rejection is associated with proinflammatory and activated effector memory T cells in the blood, evidence of treatment efficacy can only be found in the allograft itself, meaning that blood-based monitoring may be insufficient. In terms of treatment, we found that the prominence of intra-graft memory TNF-α and IL-17 double-positive T helper type 17 (Th17) cells is a leading feature of refractory rejection. Anti-TNF-α therapies appear to provide novel and safer treatment strategies for refractory ITx rejection; with responses in 14 of 14 patients. Clinical protocols targeting TNF-α, IL-17, and Th17 warrant further testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kroemer
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Leonid Belyayev
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC,Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
| | - Khalid Khan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Katrina Loh
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jiman Kang
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Anju Duttargi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Harmeet Dhani
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Mohammed Sadat
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Oswaldo Aguirre
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Yuriy Gusev
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Krithika Bhuvaneshwar
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics (ICBI), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Bhaskar Kallakury
- Department of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Christopher Cosentino
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Brenna Houlihan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jamie Diaz
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC,Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sangeetha Moturi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Nada Yazigi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Stuart Kaufman
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Sukanya Subramanian
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Jason Hawksworth
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC,Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
| | - Raffaele Girlanda
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Simon C. Robson
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cal S. Matsumoto
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Michael Zasloff
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas M. Fishbein
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rutter CS, Russell NK, Sharkey LM, Amin I, Butler AJ. Decline in renal function following intestinal transplant: is the die cast at 3 months? Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14249. [PMID: 33565629 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study reports the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) after intestinal transplant (IT) at a single, adult center in the United Kingdom. METHODS A retrospective review of IT was undertaken. Methods of renal function assessment pre-transplant were compared. Post-transplant renal function and renal sparing strategies were analyzed. RESULTS There was a 30% variation (p < .001) in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and normalized GFR at assessment. In the first 3 months post-transplant, there was a 40% decline in eGFR which was irreversible. Liver inclusion was not protective with similar eGFR at 3 months (60 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) compared with IT (55 ml/min/1.73 m2 ). The rate of decline in the first 2 months was less in multivisceral transplant (MVT; 21%) than IT (52%) suggesting surgical magnitude did not contribute. Thirty percentage of recipients had acute cellular rejection post-transplant; 58% of these were in the first 3 months with a higher proportion in MVT (64%) than IT (27%). Tacrolimus exposure did not correlate with decline in renal function over the first 3 months post-transplant. CONCLUSION We demonstrated a 40% decline in renal function within 3 months post-IT which was irreversible despite renal sparing strategies. Early intervention should be considered in patients with an acute decline in this post-transplant period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte S Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Neil K Russell
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lisa M Sharkey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irum Amin
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew J Butler
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Moon JI, Zhang H, Waldron L, Iyer KR. "Stoma or no stoma": First report of intestinal transplantation without stoma. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:3550-3557. [PMID: 32431016 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Recent data suggest that frequent endoscopy and biopsy without evidence of graft dysfunction does not appear to confer survival advantage after intestinal transplantation. After abandoning protocol surveillance, endoscopic examination was decreased significantly at our center. These observations led us to question the need for stoma creation in intestinal transplantation. Herein, we report clinical outcomes of intestinal transplantation without stoma, compared to conventional transplant with stoma. Data analysis was limited to adult intestinal transplantation without liver allograft between 2015 and 2018. We compared patient and graft survival, frequency of endoscopic evaluation, episodes of acute rejection, nutritional therapy, and renal function between "Control group (with stoma)," n = 18 grafts in 16 patients and "Study group (without stoma)," n = 16 grafts in 15 patients. Overall outcome was similar between the 2 groups with respect to graft and patient survival, episodes of acute rejection, and its response to treatment. Nutritional outcomes were similar in both groups. Fewer antidiarrheal medications were required in the study group, but this did not translate into demonstrable gains in preservation of renal function, despite an apparent trend to improvement. Intestinal transplantation without stoma appears to be an acceptable practice model without obvious adverse impact on outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jang I Moon
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Recanati Miller Transplantation Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hongbin Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, Institute for Implementation Science and Population Health, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Levi Waldron
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, Institute for Implementation Science and Population Health, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kishore R Iyer
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Recanati Miller Transplantation Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Solar H, Doeyo M, Ortega M, De Barrio S, Olano E, Moreira E, Buncuga M, Manzur A, Crivelli A, Gondolesi G. Postsurgical Intestinal Rehabilitation Using Semisynthetic Glucagon‐Like Peptide‐2 Analogue (sGLP‐2) at a Referral Center: Can Patients Achieve Parenteral Nutrition and sGLP‐2 Independency? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020; 45:1072-1082. [DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hector Solar
- Intestinal Failure, Rehabilitation and Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Translational Medicine, Transplantation and Bioengineering Research Institute (IMeTTyB) Favaloro University Buenos Aires Argentina
| | - Mariana Doeyo
- Intestinal Failure, Rehabilitation and Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Translational Medicine, Transplantation and Bioengineering Research Institute (IMeTTyB) Favaloro University Buenos Aires Argentina
| | - Mariana Ortega
- Intestinal Failure, Rehabilitation and Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Translational Medicine, Transplantation and Bioengineering Research Institute (IMeTTyB) Favaloro University Buenos Aires Argentina
| | - Silvia De Barrio
- Nutritional Support and Malabsorptive Disorders Unit San Martin Hospital La Plata Argentina
| | - Estela Olano
- Special Nutrition Unit Maciel Hospital Montevideo Uruguay
| | | | - Martin Buncuga
- Nutritional Support Unit Delta Hospital Rosario Argentina
| | - Alejandra Manzur
- Organ and Tissue Transplant Department Central Hospital Mendoza Argentina
| | - Adriana Crivelli
- Intestinal Failure, Rehabilitation and Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Translational Medicine, Transplantation and Bioengineering Research Institute (IMeTTyB) Favaloro University Buenos Aires Argentina
| | - Gabriel Gondolesi
- Intestinal Failure, Rehabilitation and Transplant Unit, Favaloro Foundation University Hospital Buenos Aires Argentina
- Translational Medicine, Transplantation and Bioengineering Research Institute (IMeTTyB) Favaloro University Buenos Aires Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Immunologic Complications and Graft Survival in Crohn's Disease and NOD2 Mutant Non-Crohn's Disease Adult Recipients Following Intestine Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e556. [PMID: 32607422 PMCID: PMC7266359 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite improved outcomes in the modern era of targeted immunotherapy, intestinal failure and chronic parenteral nutrition remains a significant burden for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) worldwide. Transplantation is a key component of management when a patient with CD suffers from life-threatening complications of parenteral nutrition. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) mutation is a risk factor for both development of CD and intestinal allograft rejection.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Transplantation of the islets of Langerhans or the pancreas aims to restore blood sugar control. We review both forms of transplantation in children. RECENT FINDINGS Allogenic islet transplantation typically in to the liver via the portal vein may be a potential alternative to pancreas transplantation in the future. Autologous islet transplantation after total pancreatectomy is effective for debilitating symptoms of recurrent and chronic pancreatitis. Chronic pancreatitis in children is most often related to genetic mutations but is otherwise similar to adults with eventual exocrine and endocrine failure. Removal of the pancreas ameliorates pain, and islet transplantation preserves endocrine function to the extent allowed by the damage sustained by the pancreas from chronic inflammation. Despite the complexity of the operative procedure, the outcome of total pancreatectomy and autologous islet transplantation in children has been excellent including quality of life.
Collapse
|