Profiling non-HLA antibody responses in antibody-mediated rejection following heart transplantation

Outcome-based Risk Assessment of Non-HLA Antibodies in Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Current monitoring after heart transplantation (HT) employs repeated invasive endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Although positive EMB confirms rejection, EMB fails to predict impending, subclinical, or EMB-negative rejection events. While non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) antibodies have emerged as important risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection after HT, their use in clinical risk stratification has been limited. A systematic review of the role of non-HLA antibodies in rejection pathologies has the potential to guide efforts to overcome deficiencies of EMB in rejection monitoring.

METHODS

Databases were searched to include studies on non-HLA antibodies in HT recipients. Data collected included the number of patients, type of rejection, non-HLA antigen studied, association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection, and evidence for synergistic interaction between non-HLA antibodies and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (HLA-DSA) responses.

RESULTS

A total of 56 studies met the inclusion criteria. Strength of evidence for each non-HLA antibody was evaluated based on the number of articles and patients in support versus against their role in mediating rejection. Importantly, despite previous intense focus on the role of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA) and anti-angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R) in HT rejection, evidence for their involvement was equivocal. Conversely, the strength of evidence for other non-HLA antibodies supports that differing rejection pathologies are driven by differing non-HLA antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying peri-HT non-HLA antibodies. Current evidence supports the role of non-HLA antibodies in all forms of HT rejection. Further investigations are required to define the mechanisms of action of non-HLA antibodies in HT rejection.

Increase of Cardiac Autoantibodies Against Beta-2-adrenergic Receptor During Acute Cellular Heart Transplant Rejection

BACKGROUND

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) in heart transplant (HTx) recipients may be accompanied by cardiac cell damage with subsequent exposure to cardiac autoantigens and the production of cardiac autoantibodies (aABs). This study aimed to evaluate a peptide array screening approach for cardiac aABs in HTx recipients during ACR (ACR-HTx).

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center observational study, sera from 37 HTx recipients, as well as age and sex-matched healthy subjects were screened for a total of 130 cardiac aABs of partially overlapping peptide sequences directed against structural proteins using a peptide array approach.

RESULTS

In ACR-HTx, troponin I (TnI) serum levels were found to be elevated. Here, we could identify aABs against beta-2-adrenergic receptor (β-2AR: EAINCYANETCCDFFTNQAY) to be upregulated in ACR-HTx (intensities: 0.80 versus 1.31, P = 0.0413). Likewise, patients positive for β-2AR aABs showed higher TnI serum levels during ACR compared with aAB negative patients (10.0 versus 30.0 ng/L, P = 0.0375). Surprisingly, aABs against a sequence of troponin I (TnI: QKIFDLRGKFKRPTLRRV) were found to be downregulated in ACR-HTx (intensities: 3.49 versus 1.13, P = 0.0025). A comparison in healthy subjects showed the same TnI sequence to be upregulated in non-ACR-HTx (intensities: 2.19 versus 3.49, P = 0.0205), whereas the majority of aABs were suppressed in non-ACR-HTx.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study served as a feasibility analysis for a peptide array screening approach in HTx recipients during ACR and identified 2 different regulated aABs in ACR-HTx. Hence, further multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic implications of aAB testing and diagnostic or therapeutic consequences.

Report of the 2022 Banff Heart Concurrent: Focus on non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies in rejection and the pathology of "mixed" rejection

The Banff Heart Concurrent Session, held as part of the 16th Banff Foundation for Allograft Pathology Conference at Banff, Alberta, Canada, on September 21, 2022, focused on 2 major topics: non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and mixed rejection. Each topic was addressed in a multidisciplinary fashion with clinical, immunological, and pathology perspectives and future developments and prospectives. Following the Banff organization model and principles, the collective aim of the speakers on each topic was to • Determine current knowledge gaps in heart transplant pathology • Identify limitations of current pathology classification systems • Discuss next steps in addressing gaps and refining classification system.

The utilization of molecular microscope in management of heart transplant recipients in the era of noninvasive monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring for graft rejection is a fundamental tenet of post-transplant follow-up. In heart transplantation (HT) in particular, rejection has been traditionally assessed with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). EMB has potential complications and noted limitations, including interobserver variability in interpretation. Additional tests, such as basic cardiac biomarkers, cardiac imaging, gene expression profiling (GEP) scores, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and the novel molecular microscope diagnostic system (MMDx) have become critical tools in rejection surveillance beyond standard EMB.

METHODS

This paper describes an illustrative case followed by a review of MMDx within the context of other noninvasive screening modalities for rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest MMDx be used to assist with early detection of rejection in cases of discordance between EMB and other noninvasive studies.

Impact of everolimus plus calcineurin inhibitor on formation of non-HLA antibodies and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: 12-month results from the ATHENA substudy

Background

Non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) antibodies including antibodies targeting Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1R) and Endothelin-1 type A (ETAR) receptors represent a topic of interest in kidney transplantation (KTx). This exploratory substudy evaluated the impact of everolimus (EVR) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine A (CsA) in patients with preformed non-HLA antibodies, potentially associated rejections and/or their impact on renal function over 1 year.

Methods

All eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) before transplantation to receive either EVR/TAC, EVR/CsA, or MPA/TAC regimen. The effect of these regimens on the formation of non-HLA antibodies within one year post de novo KTx and the association with clinical events was evaluated descriptively in randomized (n = 268) population.

Results

At Month 12, in EVR/TAC group, higher incidence of patients negative for AT1R- and ETAR-antibodies (82.2% and 76.7%, respectively) was noted, whereas the incidence of AT1R- and ETAR-antibodies positivity (28.1% and 34.7%, respectively) was higher in the MPA/TAC group. Non-HLA antibodies had no influence on clinical outcomes in any treatment group and no graft loss or death was reported.

Conclusions

The studied combinations of immunosuppressants were safe with no influence on clinical outcomes and suggested minimal exposure of calcineurin inhibitors for better patient management.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT01843348; EudraCT number: 2011-005238-21).

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

The evolving use of biomarkers in heart transplantation: Consensus of an expert panel

In heart transplantation, the use of biomarkers to detect the risk of rejection has been evolving. In this setting, it is becoming less clear as to what is the most reliable test or combination of tests to detect rejection and assess the state of the alloimmune response. Therefore, a virtual expert panel was organized in heart and kidney transplantation to evaluate emerging diagnostics and how they may be best utilized to monitor and manage transplant patients. This manuscript covers the heart content of the conference and is a work product of the American Society of Transplantation's Thoracic and Critical Care Community of Practice. This paper reviews currently available and emerging diagnostic assays and defines the unmet needs for biomarkers in heart transplantation. Highlights of the in-depth discussions among conference participants that led to development of consensus statements are included. This conference should serve as a platform to further build consensus within the heart transplant community regarding the optimal framework to implement biomarkers into management protocols and to improve biomarker development, validation and clinical utility. Ultimately, these biomarkers and novel diagnostics should improve outcomes and optimize quality of life for our transplant patients.

Beyond Adaptive Alloreactivity: Contribution of Innate B Cells to Allograft Inflammation and Rejection

Innate B cells are a heterogeneous group of cells that function in maintaining homeostatic levels of circulating natural antibodies and being the first line of defense against infections. Innate B-1 cells and marginal zone B cells may relocate to lymphoid follicles and differentiate into cytokine and antibody-secreting cells in T-independent and T-dependent manners. Although marginal zone B cells are widely described in humans, the presence of B-1 cells is more controversial. Here, we review the basic features of the innate B-cell subsets identified in mice and their equivalent in humans, as well as their potential roles in transplantation. We summarize the findings of Cascalho and colleagues on the unexpected protective role of tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 13B in regulating circulating levels of protective natural immunoglobulin M, and the studies by Zorn and colleagues on the potential pathogenic role for polyreactive innate B cells infiltrating allograft explants. Finally, we discuss our studies that took a transcriptomic approach to identify innate B cells infiltrating kidney allografts with antibody-mediated rejection and to demonstrate that local antigens within the allograft together with inflammation may induce a loss of B-cell tolerance.

Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report

The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.

Microvascular Inflammation of the Renal Allograft: A Reappraisal of the Underlying Mechanisms

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is associated with poor transplant outcomes and was identified as a leading cause of graft failure after kidney transplantation. Although the hallmark histological features of ABMR (ABMRh), i.e., microvascular inflammation (MVI), usually correlate with the presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs), it is increasingly recognized that kidney transplant recipients can develop ABMRh in the absence of HLA-DSAs. In fact, 40-60% of patients with overt MVI have no circulating HLA-DSAs, suggesting that other mechanisms could be involved. In this review, we provide an update on the current understanding of the different pathogenic processes underpinning MVI. These processes include both antibody-independent and antibody-dependent mechanisms of endothelial injury and ensuing MVI. Specific emphasis is placed on non-HLA antibodies, for which we discuss the ontogeny, putative targets, and mechanisms underlying endothelial toxicity in connection with their clinical impact. A better understanding of these emerging mechanisms of allograft injury and all the effector cells involved in these processes may provide important insights that pave the way for innovative diagnostic tools and highly tailored therapeutic strategies.

Antibody Responses to Minor Histocompatibility Antigens After Solid Organ Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major barrier to long-term graft survival following solid organ transplantation (SOT). Major histocompatibility antigens mismatched between donor and recipient are well-recognized targets of humoral alloimmunity in SOT and thought to drive most cases of AMR. In contrast, the implication of minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAs) in AMR has not been fully investigated, and their clinical relevance remains controversial. Recent technological advances, allowing for genome-wide comparisons between donors and recipients, have uncovered novel, polymorphic mHA targets with potential influence on the graft outcome following SOT. Here, we review these latest studies relating to mHAs and discuss their clinical significance.

Shotgun Immunoproteomics for Identification of Nonhuman Leukocyte Antigens Associated With Cellular Dysfunction in Heart Transplant Rejection

BACKGROUND

The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant consensus panel notes that too little data exist regarding the role of non-HLA in allograft rejection. We developed a novel shotgun immunoproteomic approach to determine the identities and potential roles non-HLA play in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplant recipients.

METHODS

Serum was collected longitudinally from heart transplant recipients experiencing AMR in the absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (n = 6) and matched no rejection controls (n = 7). Antidonor heart affinity chromatography columns were formed by recipient immunoglobulin G immobilization at transplantation, acute rejection, and chronic postrejection time points. Affinity chromatography columns were used to capture antigens from individual patient's donor heart biopsies collected at transplantation. Captured proteins were subjected to quantitative proteomic analysis and the longitudinal response was calculated.

RESULTS

Overlap in antigen-specific response between AMR and non-AMR patients was only 8.3%. In AMR patients, a total of 155 non-HLAs were identified, with responses toward 43 high prevalence antigens found in ≥50% of patients. Immunofluorescence staining for representative high prevalence antigens demonstrated that their abundance increased at acute rejection, correlating with their respective non-HLA antibody response. Physiological changes in cardiomyocyte and endothelial cell function, following in vitro culture with patient immunoglobulin G, correlated with response toward several high prevalence antigens.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates a novel high-throughput strategy to identify clinically relevant non-HLA from donor endomyocardial biopsy. Such a technique has the potential to improve understanding of longitudinal timing of antigen-specific responses and their cause and effect relationship in graft rejection.

Transcriptomic heterogeneity of antibody mediated rejection after heart transplant with or without donor specific antibodies

BACKGROUND

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) is an increasingly studied cause of graft failure after heart transplantation. AMR diagnosis previously required the detection of circulating donor specific antibodies (DSA); however, the most recent criteria only require pathological findings. This classification defined a subset of patients with AMR, yet without known antibodies. Here, we sought to evaluate differences in the transcriptome profile associated with different types of AMR.

METHODS

RNA sequencing was used on endomyocardial biopsies to analyze and compare transcriptomic profiles associated with different subtypes of AMR defined by immunopathological and histopathological findings, as well as the presence or absence of DSA. Gene expression profiles were characterized for each diagnostic group.

RESULTS

The most divergent gene expression profiles were observed between patients with or without DSA. AMR subtypes associated with DSA showed expression of signature genes involved in monocyte activation and response to interferon. There was also substantial difference between the transcriptomic profiles of AMR defined by histopathological and immunopathological findings, the latter being associated with expression of mucin genes. In contrast, there was no differential RNA expression between patients with pAMR1i without DSA and those without AMR. Likewise, no differential expression was observed between patients with pAMR1h with DSA and pAMR2.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our studies reveal different expression profiles in endomyocardial biopsies in relation to some key criteria used to diagnose AMR. These findings support the view that the diagnosis of AMR encompasses several phenotypes that may rely on distinct mechanisms of injury.

The role of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: a complex deliberation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is tremendous interest in understanding when, if, and how non-HLA antibodies contribute to allograft injury. Numerous non-HLA target antigens have been identified and sensitization to these targets have been associated with delayed allograft function, rejection, and allograft failure. This review focuses on the clinical utility of HLA antibody testing, highlighting the strengths and limitations of current clinical studies, and the need for defining characteristics to inform non-HLA antibody pathogenicity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical studies continue to show associations between non-HLA antibodies and rejection and reduced allograft survival across multiple transplanted organ types. The worst clinical outcomes continue to be observed among recipients testing positive for both non-HLA and donor-specific HLA antibodies. Mechanistic insights from both animal and clinical studies support a model in which tissue injury accompanied by an inflammatory environment influence non-HLA antibody formation and pathogenicity.

SUMMARY

Immune triggers that lead to non-HLA antibody formation and pathogenicity are complex and poorly understood. The ability of non-HLA antibodies to mediate allograft injury may depend upon their affinity and strength (titer), target specificity, density of the target antigen, and synergy with donor-specific HLA antibodies.

Novel biomarkers useful in surveillance of graft rejection after heart transplantation

Heart transplantation (HTx) is considered the gold-standard therapy for the treatment of advanced heart failure (HF). The long-term survival in HTx is hindered by graft failure which represents one of the major limitations of the long-term efficacy of HTx. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and the evaluation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are currently considered the essential diagnostic tools for surveillance of graft rejection. Recently, new molecular biomarkers (including cell-free DeoxyriboNucleic Acid, exosomes, gene profiling microarray, nanostring, reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, proteomics and immune profiling by quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence) provide useful information on mechanisms of graft rejection. The ambitious role of a similar change of perspective is aimed at a better and longer graft preservation.

Donor-recipient Matching in Heart Transplantation

Heart transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage Heart Failure (HF). Due to the shortage of organs for transplantation and the occurrence of perioperative complications, a key problem is donor matching, which should result in increased survival and improved quality of life for patients. The success of this procedure depends on various parameters such as gender, weight, ABO blood group and Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) system of both the recipient and the donor. Furthermore, non-HLA antigens may also be valuable in donor-recipient matching. The aim of this article is to summarize the recent knowledge on the impact of various factors on accurate donor-recipient matching to heart transplantation.

Association of vimentin antibody and other non-HLA antibodies with treated antibody mediated rejection in heart transplant recipients

Non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies have been implicated in heart transplantation rejection. However, targets of non-HLA antibodies remain elusive. Here, we utilized a panel of multiplex beads-based assay to determine the specificity of non-HLA antibodies following heart transplantation. We utilized a selected cohort of recipients who did not have HLA donor specific antibodies, but were diagnosed with antibody mediated rejection and treated for antibody mediated rejection. We found the presence of vimentin antibody was associated with treated antibody mediated rejection. Our results suggest that, in heart transplant recipients who are suspected of AMR but in the absence of HLA donor specific antibodies, non-HLA antibodies should be examined.

Non-invasive cardiac allograft rejection surveillance: reliability and clinical value for prevention of heart failure

Allograft rejection-related acute and chronic heart failure (HF) is a major cause of death in heart transplant recipients. Given the deleterious impact of late recognized acute rejection (AR) or non-recognized asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection on short- and long-term allograft function improvement of AR surveillance and optimization of action strategies for confirmed AR can prevent AR-related allograft failure and delay the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, which is the major cause for HF after the first posttransplant year. Routine non-invasive monitoring of cardiac function can improve both detection and functional severity grading of AR. It can also be helpful in guiding the anti-AR therapy and timing of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs). The combined use of EMBs with non-invasive technologies and methods, which allow detection of subclinical alterations in myocardial function (e.g., tissue Doppler imaging and speckle-tracking echocardiography), reveal alloimmune activation (e.g., screening of complement-activating donor-specific antibodies and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA) and help in predicting the imminent risk of immune-mediated injury (e.g., gene expression profiling, screening of non-HLA antibodies, and circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA), can ensure the best possible surveillance and management of AR. This article gives an overview of the current knowledge about the reliability and clinical value of non-invasive cardiac allograft AR surveillance. Particular attention is focused on the potential usefulness of non-invasive tools and techniques for detection and functional grading of early and late ARs in asymptomatic patients. Overall, the review aimed to provide a theoretical and practical basis for those engaged in this particularly demanding up-to-date topic.

Impact and production of Non-HLA-specific antibodies in solid organ transplantation

Organ transplantation is an effective way to treat end-stage organ disease. Extending the graft survival is one of the major goals in the modern era of organ transplantation. However, long-term graft survival has not significantly improved in recent years despite the improvement of patient management and advancement of immunosuppression regimen. Antibody-mediated rejection is a major obstacle for long-term graft survival. Donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies were initially identified as a major cause for antibody-mediated rejection. Recently, with the development of solid-phase-based assay reagents, the contribution of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation starts to be appreciated. Here, we review the role of most studied non-HLA antibodies, including angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁ R), K-α-tubulin and vimentin antibodies, in the solid organ transplant, and discuss the possible mechanism by which these antibodies are stimulated.