Cytomegalovirus DNAemia and risk of mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Analysis from the Spanish Hematopoietic Transplantation and Cell Therapy Group

CMV reactivation during pretransplantation evaluation: a novel risk factor for posttransplantation CMV reactivation

ABSTRACT

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease occurs occasionally before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and is associated with poor post-HCT outcomes; however, the impact of pre-HCT CMV reactivation is unknown. Pre-HCT CMV reactivation was assessed in HCT candidates from the preemptive antiviral therapy (2007-2017) and letermovir prophylaxis (2018-2021) eras. CMV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) surveillance was routinely performed during the pre-HCT workup period, and antiviral therapy was recommended according to risk of progression to CMV disease. Risk factors for pre-HCT CMV reactivation were characterized, and the associations of pre-HCT CMV reactivation with post-HCT outcomes were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. A total of 1694 patients were identified, and 11% had pre-HCT CMV reactivation 14 days (median; interquartile range [IQR], 6-23) before HCT. Lymphopenia (≤0.3 × 103/μL) was the strongest risk factor for pre-HCT CMV reactivation at multiple PCR levels. In the preemptive therapy era, patients with pre-HCT CMV reactivation had a significantly increased risk of CMV reactivation by day 100 as well as CMV disease and death by 1 year after HCT. Clearance of pre-HCT CMV reactivation was associated with a lower risk of post-HCT CMV reactivation. Similar associations with post-HCT CMV end points were observed in a cohort of patients receiving letermovir prophylaxis. Pre-HCT CMV reactivation can be routinely detected in high-risk HCT candidates and is a significant risk factor for post-HCT CMV reactivation and disease. Pre-HCT CMV DNA PCR surveillance is recommended in high-risk HCT candidates, and antiviral therapy may be indicated to prevent post-HCT CMV reactivation.

Epidemiology, treatment patterns, and disease burden of cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients in selected countries outside of Europe and North America: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease impacts morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. This systematic review summarized data on the epidemiology, management, and burden of CMV post-HCT outside of Europe and North America.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for observational studies and treatment guidelines in HCT recipients across 15 selected countries from Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East (search period: 1 January 2011-17 September 2021). Outcomes included incidence of CMV infection/disease, recurrence, risk factors, CMV-related mortality, treatments, refractory, resistant CMV, and burden.

RESULTS

Of 2708 references identified, 68 were eligible (67 studies and one guideline; 45/67 studies specific to adult allogeneic HCT recipients). The rates of CMV infection and disease within 1 year of allogeneic HCT were 24.9%-61.2% (23 studies) and 2.9%-15.7% (10 studies), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 19.8%-37.9% of cases (11 studies). Up to 10% of HCT recipients died of CMV-related causes. In all countries, first-line treatment for CMV infection/disease involved intravenous ganciclovir or valganciclovir. Conventional treatments were associated with serious adverse events such as myelosuppression (10.0%) or neutropenia only (30.0%, 39.8%) and nephrotoxicity (11.0%) (three studies), frequently leading to treatment discontinuation (up to 13.6%). Refractory CMV was reported in 2.9%, 13.0%, and 28.9% of treated patients (three studies) with resistant CMV diagnosed in 0%-10% of recipients (five studies). Patient-reported outcomes and economic data were scarce.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CMV infection and disease post-HCT is high outside of North America and Europe. CMV resistance and toxicity highlight a major unmet need with current conventional treatments.

Effectiveness of letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A global systematic review

OBJECTIVE(S)

Letermovir (LET), a novel antiviral, has largely supplanted more traditional preemptive therapy (PET) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) patients. Use of LET demonstrated efficacy against placebo in phase III randomized controlled trials, but is considerably more expensive than PET. This review aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of LET in preventing clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) for allo-HCT recipients and related outcomes.

DESIGN

A systematic literature review was performed using an a priori protocol using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2010 to October 2021.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: LET compared with PET, CMV-related outcomes, patients aged 18 years or older, and English language-only articles. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study characteristics and outcomes.

OUTCOME MEASURES

CMV viremia, csCMVi, CMV end-organ disease, graft-versus-host-disease, all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 233 abstracts were screened, with 30 included in this review. Randomized trials demonstrated efficacy of LET prophylaxis in preventing csCMVi. Observational studies demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness of LET prophylaxis compared with use of PET alone. All studies with a comparator group resulted in lower rates of csCMVi for patients using LET. Included studies varied widely by CMV viral load threshold cutoff and CMV test units, limiting synthesis of results owing to high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

LET reduces risk of csCMVi, but lack of standardized clinical definitions on how to evaluate csCMVi and related outcomes largely prevent synthesis of results. Clinicians must consider this limitation in the context of evaluating the effectiveness of LET to other antiviral therapies, especially for patients at risk of late-onset CMV. Future studies should focus on prospective data collection through registries and concordance of diagnostic definitions to mitigate study heterogeneity.

Letermovir for Prophylaxis and Pre-emptive Therapy of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Paediatric Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a frequent event in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to eventual progress to end-organ disease. Letermovir prophylaxis for CMV infections has become a standard of care in adult HCT recipients due to its efficacy and high tolerability. However, it is not yet approved for paediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE

In a retrospective single-centre observational study we evaluated the use of letermovir for prophylaxis or pre-emptive treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in seropositive paediatric HCT recipients receiving the compound outside of clinical trials. The primary endpoint was CMV reactivation requiring a change of medication.

METHODS

A total of 17 patients (seven female/ten male; median age 12.2 [range 3.5-19] years, median body weight 39.5 [range 15-63] kg; median follow-up time 463.7 [range 41-1022] days) were identified who were started on oral (14) or intravenous (3) followed by oral (2) letermovir shortly after neutrophil engraftment at doses determined on the basis of age, weight, and concomitant cyclosporine use.

RESULTS

Five patients had no evidence of viral replication (prophylactic use), while 12 patients had varying extents of viral replication (pre-emptive therapy). A change of therapy was required in one patient due to a sustained increase in CMV viral load, and in two patients, letermovir was stopped without later reactivation after initiation of palliative care for recurrent leukaemia. Of the 14 patients who completed treatment, 3 had evidence of transient viral replication after end of treatment that required no further antiviral treatment. No patients (of 17) discontinued letermovir due to an adverse event.

CONCLUSION

Letermovir was effective in controlling CMV infection in seropositive paediatric allogeneic HCT recipients and was overall well tolerated. Pending completion of the still ongoing paediatric investigation plans, letermovir will be an important adjunct to our options for control of infectious complications in this special population.

Features of cytomegalovirus infection and evaluation of cytomegalovirus-specific T cells therapy in children’s patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective single-center study

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a critical cause of mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), despite improvement by pre-emptive antivirus treatment. CMV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CMV-CTL) are universally used and proven well-tolerance after allo-HSCT in adult clinical trials. However, it is not comprehensively evaluated in children’s patients. Herein, we conducted a retrospective study to determine the risk factors of CMV infection and evaluation of CMV-CTL in children patients who underwent allo-HSCT. As result, a significantly poor 5-year overall survival was found in the CMV infection group (87.3 vs. 94.6%, p=0.01). Haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) was identified as an independent risk factor for CMV infection through both univariate and multivariate analyses (p<0.001, p=0.027, respectively). Furthermore, the cumulative incidence of CMV infection was statistically higher in the haplo-HSCT group compared to the HLA-matched donor group (44.2% vs. 21.6%, p<0.001). Finally, the overall response rate of CMV-CTL was 89.7% (26/29 patients) in CMV infection after allo-HSCT. We concluded that CMV infection following allo-HSCT correlated with increased mortality in children’s patients, and haplo-HSCT was an independent risk factor for CMV infection. Adoptive CMV-CTL cell therapy was safe and effective in pediatric patients with CMV infection.

Risk Factors for CMV Viremia and Treatment-Associated Adverse Events Among Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes substantial morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There are limited data on risk factors for CMV viremia and the safety of antiviral medications used to treat CMV in children.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of children who underwent HSCT between 2000 and 2016. We used log-logistic regression to evaluate associations between clinical characteristics and CMV-free survival at 100 days after HSCT. We compared the incidences of laboratory-defined adverse events (AEs) during treatment with ganciclovir and foscarnet.

RESULTS

Among 969 children, the median (interquartile range) age was 6.5 (3.1-11.5) years, and 80% underwent allogeneic HSCT. Two hundred forty-four (25%) children developed CMV viremia. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98), male sex (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99), non-Black, non-White race (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87), umbilical cord blood donor source (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.97), and CMV seropositivity (R-/D+: OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.41; R+/D-: OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.21; R+/D+: OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.15) were associated with lower odds of 100-day CMV-free survival. Compared with foscarnet, ganciclovir was associated with lower incidences of thrombocytopenia (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97), electrolyte AEs (IRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.75), endocrine AEs (IRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.79), and renal AEs (IRR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

CMV viremia occurred commonly among children after HSCT, and ganciclovir and foscarnet were associated with distinct toxicity profiles among children with CMV infection. These findings should be considered when developing CMV prevention and treatment strategies for children after HSCT.

Revisiting the Role of γδ T Cells in Anti-CMV Immune Response after Transplantation

Gamma delta (γδ) T cells form an unconventional subset of T lymphocytes that express a T cell receptor (TCR) consisting of γ and δ chains. Unlike conventional αβ T cells, γδ T cells share the immune signature of both the innate and the adaptive immunity. These features allow γδ T cells to act in front-line defense against infections and tumors, rendering them an attractive target for immunotherapy. The role of γδ T cells in the immune response to cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been the focus of intense research for several years, particularly in the context of transplantation, as CMV reactivation remains a major cause of transplant-related morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie CMV immune responses could enable the design of novel γδ T cell-based therapeutic approaches. In this regard, the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and single-cell TCR sequencing have allowed in-depth characterization of CMV-induced TCR repertoire changes. In this review, we try to shed light on recent findings addressing the adaptive role of γδ T cells in CMV immunosurveillance and revisit CMV-induced TCR reshaping in the era of NGS. Finally, we will demonstrate the favorable and unfavorable effects of CMV reactive γδ T cells post-transplantation.

Assessment of the association between cytomegalovirus DNAemia and subsequent acute graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: A multicenter study from the Spanish hematopoietic transplantation and cell therapy group

The potential role of active CMV infection in promoting acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (aGvHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a matter of debate. We further addressed this issue conducting a retrospective, observational, multicenter study of 632 patients subjected to allogeneic peripheral blood HSCT at 20 Spanish centers. Monitoring of CMV DNA load in plasma or whole blood was performed by real-time PCR assays. Cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia was 48.9% (95% CI, 45%-52.9%), of any grade aGvHD, 45.6; 95% (CI, 41.3%-50.1%), and of grade II-IV aGvHD, 30.7 (95% CI, 24.9%-36.4%). Overall, development of CMV DNAemia at any level resulted in an increased risk of subsequent all grade (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.08 - 1.76; P = .009) or grade II-IV (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.22 - 2.06; P = .001) aGvHD. The increased risk of aGvHD linked to prior occurrence of CMV DNAemia was similar to the above when only clinically significant episodes were considered for the analyses (HR for all grade aGvHD, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.13 - 1.91; P = .041, and HR for grade II-IV aGvHD, 1.53; 95% CI. 1.13-1.81; P = .04). The CMV DNA doubling time in blood was comparable overall in episodes of CMV DNAemia whether followed by aGvHD or not. Whether CMV replication is a surrogate risk marker of aGvHD or it is causally involved is an important question to be addressed in future experimental research.

Clinical outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients developing Cytomegalovirus DNAemia prior to engraftment

There is limited information on the impact of CMV DNAemia episodes developing prior to engraftment (pre-CMV DNAemia) on clinical outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This issue was addressed in the current retrospective multicenter study including 878 patients. All participant centers used preemptive antiviral therapy strategies for prevention of CMV disease. CMV DNA load in blood was monitored by real-time PCR assays. A total of 144 patients (cumulative incidence 16.5%, 95% CI, 14%-19%) had an episode of pre-CMV DNAemia at a median of 10 days after allo-HSCT. Patients who developed pre-CMV DNAemia had a significantly higher (P = < 0.001) probability of recurrent episodes (50%) than those who experienced post-CMV DNAemia (32.9%); Nevertheless, the incidence of CMV disease was comparable (P = 0.52). Cumulative incidences of overall mortality (OM) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1-year after allo-HSCT were 32% (95% CI, 29-35%) and 23% (95% CI 20-26%), respectively. The risk of OM and NRM in adjusted models appeared comparable in patients developing a single episode of CMV DNAemia, regardless of whether it occurred before or after engraftment, in patients with pre- and post-engraftment CMV DNAemia episodes or in those without CMV DNAemia.