1
|
Weinmann S, Rawlings A, Koppolu P, Rosales AG, Prado YK, Schmidt MA. Herpes zoster diagnosis and treatment in relation to incident dementia: A population-based retrospective matched cohort study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296957. [PMID: 38271405 PMCID: PMC10810473 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that some infectious diseases, such as herpes zoster (HZ), are associated with elevated risk of subsequent dementia, while certain anti-viral medications are associated with lower risk. We sought to evaluate associations between HZ diagnosis and treatment with incident dementia in a large, retrospective matched cohort. METHODS Using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes in electronic medical records, we identified members of Kaiser Permanente Northwest age 50 and older from 2000-2019 with a HZ diagnosis during this period. A comparison group without HZ diagnosis was individually matched 3:1 on age at HZ diagnosis date (index date), sex, and membership length prior to index date. We excluded subjects with dementia diagnosed before the index date. Antiherpetic medication was identified using pharmacy fills 1 month before to 12 months after the index date. We employed survival analysis to examine the associations between dementia and HZ diagnosis and antiherpetic medication, adjusting multivariable models for demographic and clinical factors. We stratified on age and sex and conducted a sensitivity analysis with a 5-year lag period. RESULT The study included 101,328 persons, 25,332 with HZ. Over a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 6,000 developed dementia. HZ diagnosis was not associated with higher hazard of dementia (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.05) in the primary analysis. Among persons with HZ diagnoses, the HR for receipt of any antiherpetic medication was 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.90) in univariate analysis and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-1.00) after adjustment for demographic and clinical factors. Dementia was not associated with trends in duration of medication use or cumulative dose. CONCLUSIONS We found little evidence for an association between HZ diagnosis and dementia overall. Antiherpetic medication prescribed around the time of HZ diagnosis was statistically associated with lower risk of subsequent dementia in some but not all analyses and subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Weinmann
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Andreea Rawlings
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Padma Koppolu
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - A. Gabriela Rosales
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Yolanda K. Prado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Mark A. Schmidt
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li H, Li Y, Liu J, Liu J, Han J, Yang L. Vaccination reduces viral load and accelerates viral clearance in SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant-infected patients. Ann Med 2023; 55:419-427. [PMID: 36862600 PMCID: PMC9991402 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2166681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate vaccine effectiveness in relieving symptoms in patients with the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant. METHODS In this retrospective study, 31 patients did not receive any vaccine (non-vaccination, NV), 21 patients received 1-dose of inactivated vaccine (one-dose vaccination, OV), and 60 patients received at least 2-dose inactivated vaccine (two-dose vaccination, TV). The baseline data, clinical outcomes and vaccination information were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Patients in the OV group were younger than those in the other two groups (p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference in any of the other baseline data among the three groups. The TV group showed higher IgG antibody levels and cycle threshold values of SARS-CoV-2 than the NV and OV groups (p < 0.01), and time to peak viral load was shorter in the TV group (3.5 ± 2.3 d) than in the NV (4.8 ± 2.8 d) and OV groups (4.8 ± 2.9 d, p = 0.03). The patients in the TV group (18%) showed a higher recovery rate without drug therapy (p < 0.001). Viral clearance time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the TV group than in the NV and OV groups (p < 0.01), and there were no significant differences in these parameters between the OV and NV groups, but IgG values were higher in the OV group (p = 0.025). No severe complications occurred in this study. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that 2-dose vaccination can reduce viral load and accelerate viral clearance in patients with the delta variant and enhance the protection afforded by IgG antibodies in vivo.Key MessagesIn this study, our results shows that two-dose vaccination can reduce viral loads and accelerate viral clearance, and two-dose vaccination enhance the protection of IgG antibodies in vivo; however, one-dose vaccination did not confer protective effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongxia Li
- Department of Medical Administration, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yanzi Li
- Department of Medical Administration, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Junhui Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jianlin Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jianfeng Han
- Department of Administrative Office, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.,Department of Administrative Office, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weinberg AR, Caeg CO, DePalma R, Hernandez F, Rogers JH, Ibrahim HN, Bynon SJ, Nigo M. COVID-19 Vaccine Seroresponse Based on The Timing of The Primary Series; Pre- versus Post-Renal Transplantation. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e15072. [PMID: 37434417 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses a serious risk to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal transplant. While COVID-19 vaccination is recommended before transplant, there are limited data comparing vaccine timing. Our aim is to evaluate serological responses to COVID-19 vaccines pre- and post-renal transplant and the durability of antibody levels. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the antibody response of adult renal transplant recipients who had received at least a primary series of the COVID-19 vaccine. The patients were divided into two groups based on the timing; pre- or post-transplant. Antibody titer levels were evaluated at least 4 weeks after vaccination for each group. Titer durability was assessed by calculating the median titer level of individuals. RESULTS A total of 139 patients were identified between January 2019 and April 2022. Twenty-nine patients were excluded because of previous COVID-19 infection, and 15 patients were excluded each for insufficient vaccine doses and lack of titer data. Forty patients were included for the pre-transplant group and 40 for post-transplant. The number of pre-transplant patients who developed antibodies (39 patients, 97.5%) was significantly greater than the number of post-transplant patients (21 patients, 52.5%) with p < .01. The median post-vaccination titer levels were significantly greater in the pre-transplant group up to 5 months after vaccination (p < .05). The pre-transplant group's titers seemed sustained even after renal transplantation. CONCLUSION Vaccinating renal transplant patients before transplant results in increased achievement of seroresponse, higher levels of antibody titers, and sustained titers following transplant. Larger and prospective studies are warranted to confirm the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy R Weinberg
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Calvin O Caeg
- Transplant Center, Memorial Hermann Hospital Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robyn DePalma
- Transplant Center, Memorial Hermann Hospital Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Frances Hernandez
- Transplant Center, Memorial Hermann Hospital Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jackson H Rogers
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hassan N Ibrahim
- Division of Immunology and Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Steve J Bynon
- Division of Immunology and Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Masayuki Nigo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aggarwal J, Nguyen KT, Campbell ML, Shiau S, Shendell DG. Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Case Status among New Jersey Secondary Educational Professionals. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1667. [PMID: 38005999 PMCID: PMC10674534 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccine hesitancy remains a societal problem, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Jersey (NJ) Safe Schools Program provides work-based learning training to supervisory-level career-technical-vocational education teachers and administrators who have to consider varied state and local mandates concerning COVID-19 vaccination and exemptions. METHODS In early 2022, we distributed an online survey via PsychData to individuals trained between 2014 and 2022 to understand NJ teachers' practices and concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccines. Overall, 269 completed the survey. We stratified data by vaccination status, number of doses, booster status, age, teaching experience, gender, race, county of work, and COVID-19 diagnosis status. RESULTS Overall, results suggested differences in COVID-19-related concerns, including access to, perceptions of, and confidence in COVID-19 vaccines and COVID-19-related practices. About 90.7% received the initial vaccine; 77.7% received the booster. About half the participants had received a positive COVID-19 diagnosis by the time of the survey; they were less likely to get the vaccine or booster if they had received the initial vaccine. CONCLUSIONS Data suggested differences in levels of COVID-19-related concerns and confidence in, or importance of, vaccines when comparing different demographic factors and vaccination practices. The data informs efforts to understand factors affecting vaccine hesitancy among educational professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhi Aggarwal
- NJ Safe Schools Program, Rutgers School of Public Health (SPH), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA (M.L.C.); (D.G.S.)
| | - Kimberly T. Nguyen
- NJ Safe Schools Program, Rutgers School of Public Health (SPH), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA (M.L.C.); (D.G.S.)
| | - Maryanne L. Campbell
- NJ Safe Schools Program, Rutgers School of Public Health (SPH), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA (M.L.C.); (D.G.S.)
| | - Stephanie Shiau
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Rutgers School of Public Health (SPH), Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA;
| | - Derek G. Shendell
- NJ Safe Schools Program, Rutgers School of Public Health (SPH), Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA (M.L.C.); (D.G.S.)
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and Justice, Rutgers School of Public Health (SPH), Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among New Jersey Teachers and Impacts of Vaccination Information Dissemination. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020466. [PMID: 36851344 PMCID: PMC9967281 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy continues to be prevalent in the United States, especially in relation to the COVID-19 vaccines and its boosters, which have been made increasingly available for public use as the pandemic has progressed. There continues to be concern surrounding the safety and health of secondary or high school education professionals as they transition back to in-person learning and working opportunities. The present study highlights how information dissemination regarding the COVID-19 vaccine has varied among New Jersey secondary or high school teachers throughout the pandemic. The survey was completed online through the PsychData platform by 269 participants between March and July 2022. Participants received the opportunity to complete the survey via email. Afterwards, data were exported and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SAS 9.4 Analytics Software and stratified by various clinical and demographic-based variables. While trusted agencies and media outlets identified by participants varied, most participants identified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (65.4%), primary care providers (37.5%), and state health departments (28.6%) as their top trusted sources for information related to COVID-19 vaccines. Overall, COVID-19 vaccination advocacy and educational efforts should continue across the state of New Jersey and elsewhere, especially as more variants emerge and boosters become available.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vinson AJ, Anzalone AJ, Sun J, Dai R, Agarwal G, Lee SB, French E, Olex A, Ison MG, Mannon RB. The risk and consequences of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients relative to non-immunosuppressed controls. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2418-2432. [PMID: 35674237 PMCID: PMC9348256 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with breakthrough COVID (BTCo) after two doses of mRNA vaccination compared to the non-immunocompromised/immunosuppressed (ISC) general population, are not well described. In a cohort of adult patients testing positive for COVID-19 between December 10, 2020 and April 4, 2022, we compared the cumulative incidence of BTCo in a non-ISC population to SOT recipients (overall and by organ type) using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) including data from 36 sites across the United States. We assessed the risk of complications post-BTCo in vaccinated SOT recipients versus SOT with unconfirmed vaccination status (UVS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression. BTCo occurred in 4776 vaccinated SOT recipients over a median of 149 days (IQR 99-233), with the highest cumulative incidence in heart recipients. The relative risk of BTCo was greatest in SOT recipients (relative to non-ISC) during the pre-Delta period (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.80-3.08). The greatest relative benefit with vaccination for both non-ISC and SOT cohorts was in BTCo mortality (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.36-0.39 for non-ISC; HR 0.67, 95% 0.57-0.78 for SOT relative to UVS). While the relative benefit of vaccine was less in SOT than non-ISC, SOT patients still exhibited significant benefit with vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J. Vinson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
| | - Alfred J. Anzalone
- Department of Neurological Sciences University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, Maryland USA
| | - Ran Dai
- Department of Biostatistics University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
| | - Gaurav Agarwal
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama USA
| | - Stephen B. Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases (Regina) University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
| | - Evan French
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia USA
| | - Amy Olex
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia USA
| | - Michael G. Ison
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, Illinois USA
| | - Roslyn B. Mannon
- Division of Nephology, Department of Medicine University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
| | - N3C consortium
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
- Department of Neurological Sciences University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
- Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, Maryland USA
- Department of Biostatistics University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases (Regina) University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, Illinois USA
- Division of Nephology, Department of Medicine University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Packham A, Spence N, Goodman A. Evolving role of novel COVID-19 Medicine Delivery Units. INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/ihj-2022-000135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
8
|
Marcelin JR, Pettifor A, Janes H, Brown ER, Kublin JG, Stephenson KE. COVID-19 Vaccines and SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in the Era of New Variants: A Review and Perspective. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac124. [PMID: 35493113 PMCID: PMC8992234 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have yielded definitive prevention and major reductions in morbidity and mortality from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, even in the context of emerging and persistent variants of concern. Newer variants have revealed less vaccine protection against infection and attenuation of vaccine effects on transmission. COVID-19 vaccines still likely reduce transmission compared with not being vaccinated at all, even with variants of concern; however, determining the magnitude of transmission reduction is constrained by the challenges of performing these studies, requiring accurate linkage of infections to vaccine status and timing thereof, particularly within households. In this review, we synthesize the currently available data on the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on infection, serious illness, and transmission; we also identify the challenges and opportunities associated with policy development based on this data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine R Marcelin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha Nebraska, USA
| | | | - Holly Janes
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Brown
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - James G Kublin
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Kathryn E Stephenson
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|