Real-world experience with available, outpatient COVID-19 therapies in solid organ transplant recipients during the omicron surge

The effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen in hospitalized renal transplant patients with prolonged COVID-19 infection: a multicenter clinical experience

OBJECTIVES

Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) infected COVID-19 for more than 5 days has not been evaluated.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective study, 85 KTRs with COVID-19 were enrolled, including 50 moderate, 21 severe, and 14 critical patients.

RESULTS

The median time from onset to starting NR treatment was 14 (IQR, 11-19) days. Before NR treatment, 96.5% patients reduced use of antimetabolites. They also stopped using calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) 12-24 hours before NR treatment, with CNI concentrations well-controlled during NR treatment. The use of intravenous corticosteroids increased with COVID-19 severity. The median time to reach viral negative conversion was 5 (IQR, 4-8) days for all patients. For moderate and severe COVID-19 patients, they had a low rate of ICU admission (1.4%), exacerbation requiring upgraded oxygen therapy (5.6%), and dialysis (2.8%); no intubation and mechanical ventilation, and no deaths were observed. Patients with critical COVID-19 had a low mortality rate (7.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen including NR for clearing SARS-CoV-2 along with reducing immunosuppressants and using intravenous corticosteroids is associated with lower rates of exacerbation and mortality in KTRs who have moderate to critical SARS-CoV-2 infection and the virus still present after 5 days.

Real-world effectiveness of early anti-SARS therapy in severely immunocompromised COVID-19 outpatients during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant era: a propensity score-adjusted retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of the early treatment for antiviral agents in SARS-CoV-2 infection is closely related to patient comorbidities. Data on effectiveness in immunocompromised patients are limited, with reports involving highly heterogeneous and not well-defined populations. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of treatment in reducing hospitalizations in a real-world cohort of severely immunocompromised COVID-19 outpatients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study of immunocompromised outpatients attended in infectious diseases departments from 1 January to 31 December 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio [(aOR, 95% confidence interval (CI)] for the association between antiviral prescription and outcome (COVID-19-related hospitalization up to Day 90).

RESULTS

We identified 746 immunocompromised outpatients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. After eligibility criteria and PSM, a total of 410 patients were analysed: 205 receiving treatment (remdesivir, sotrovimab or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) and 205 matched controls. Fifty-two patients required at least one COVID-19-related hospitalization 8 (3.9%) versus 44 (21.5%) in the antiviral and matched control cohorts, respectively. There were 13 deaths at 90 days, of which only 4 were COVID-19-related and none in the antiviral treatment group. After adjustment for residual confounders, the use of early therapy was associated with a protective effect on the risk of hospitalization [aOR 0.13 (0.05-0.29)], as was the use of biological immunomodulators [aOR 0.27 (0.10-0.74)], whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [aOR 4.65 (1.09-19.69)] and anti-CD20 use [aOR 2.76 (1.31-5.81)] increased the odds.

CONCLUSIONS

Early antiviral treatment was associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization in ambulatory severely immunocompromised COVID-19 patients.

Management of Kidney Transplant Outpatients With COVID-19: A Single Center Experience

Patients undergoing kidney transplant are at risk of severe COVID-19. Our single-center retrospective analysis evaluated the outcomes of kidney transplant outpatients with COVID-19 who were managed with reduced immunosuppression and treatment with molnupiravir. Between January 2022 and May 2023, we included 93 patients (62 men, average age 56 years), serum creatinine 127 (101-153) µmol/L. Molnupiravir was administered, and immunosuppressive therapy was reduced immediately following the confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR, which was 2 (1-3) days after the onset of symptoms. Only three (3.2%) patients required hospitalization, and one patient died. Acute kidney injury was observed in two patients. During the follow-up period of 19 (15-22) months, there was no significant increase in proteinuria, no acute or new chronic graft rejection, and kidney graft function remained stable; serum creatinine was 124 (106-159) µmol/L post-COVID-19 infection and 128 (101-161) µmol/L at the end of the follow-up period. Our results demonstrate that early initiation of molnupiravir treatment combined with a temporary reduction in immunosuppressive therapy results in favorable clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, with preservation of good graft function and no episodes of graft rejection.

Evaluation of the drug-drug interactions management system for appropriate use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: a retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

While nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV-r) has been positioned as a first-line treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19, it has multiple and significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The use of NMV-r in Japan has been limited compared to the United States. This study aimed to describe the distribution of DDIs with NMV-r and their management in patients with COVID-19 under the control of a management system for the appropriate use of NMV-r.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted at a Japanese university hospital. The management system included a flowchart for selecting antivirals and a list for reviewing DDI management, based on the National Institutes of Health guidelines and the guidance of the Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences. Patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and prescribed NMV-r or molnupiravir (MOV) were included. The primary outcome was DDI management practices, including the selected COVID-19 medications. The secondary outcome included the distribution of DDI classification and the 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

This study included 241 patients (median age of 60 years, 112 [46.5%] females), of whom 126 and 115 received NMV-r and MOV, respectively. Of the 241 patients, 145 (60.2%) received concomitant medications that have DDIs with NMV-r. All 30 patients with severe renal impairment or insufficient details on concomitant medications received MOV. Forty-nine patients with concomitant medications required alternative COVID-19 therapy consideration due to DDIs, of whom 42 (85.7%) patients received MOV. Eighty-one patients had concomitant medications requiring temporary adjustment, of whom 44 (54.3%) patients received NMV-r, and 42 of these patients temporarily adjusted these concomitant medications. Five patients with concomitant medications that can continued by monitoring the effects/adverse effects, of whom 4 (80.0%) patients received NMV-r. Seventy-six patients without concomitant medications requiring DDI management, of whom 71 (93.4%) patients received NMV-r. The 30-day all-cause mortality for eligible patients was 0.9% [95% confidence interval, 0.1-3.1].

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients received appropriate antivirals according to the classification of DDIs, and most patients with concomitant medications requiring temporary adjustment received the recommended DDI management. Our management system is effective in promoting the use of NMV-r in the appropriate patients and managing problematic DDIs.

Oral antivirals for COVID-19 among patients with cancer

PURPOSE

Immunocompromised individuals, such as those diagnosed with cancer, are at a significantly higher risk for severe illness and mortality when infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) than the general population. Two oral antiviral treatments are approved for COVID-19: Paxlovid® (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) and Lagevrio® (molnupiravir). There is a paucity of data regarding the benefit from these antivirals among immunocompromised patients with cancer, and recent studies have questioned their efficacy among vaccinated patients, even those with risk factors for severe COVID-19.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in preventing severe illness and death using our database of 457 patients with cancer and COVID-19 from Brown University-affiliated hospitals.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir and were compared to 45 concurrent controls who received no antiviral treatment despite being eligible to receive it. Administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir was associated with improved survival and lower 90-day all-cause and COVID-19-attributed mortality (p < 0.05) and with lower peak O2 requirements (ordinal odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-2.56).

CONCLUSION

Acknowledging the small size of our sample as a limitation, we concluded that early antiviral treatment might be beneficial to immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with cancer, when infected with SARS-CoV-2. Larger-scale, well-stratified studies are needed in this patient population.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir versus sotrovimab for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) and sotrovimab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

A search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to explore relevant studies from January 2021 to November 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Data analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3.0).

RESULTS

Fifteen retrospective studies involving 13, 306 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and sotrovimab groups in terms of mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28 to 1.38), hospitalization rate (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.22), death or hospitalization rate (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.10), and intensive unit care admission (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.38 to 10.07). In terms of safety, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events (OR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.29 to 9.17).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis showed that nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and sotrovimab have similar effectiveness in treating COVID-19 patients. However, the certainty of evidence supporting these findings is low. High-quality research is needed to better compare these interventions in COVID-19.

Comparison of COVID-19 Hospitalization and Death Between Solid Organ Transplant Recipients and the General Population in Canada, 2020-2022

Background

Solid organ transplant recipients have a high risk of severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A comprehensive understanding of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across multiple waves in the solid organ transplant population and how this compares to the general population is limited. We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked administrative healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada to answer this question.

Methods

We included 15 306 solid organ transplant recipients and 12 160 904 individuals from the general population. Our primary outcome was the rate (per 100 person-years) of severe COVID-19 (ie, hospitalization or death with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test) occurring between January 25, 2020, and November 30, 2022.

Results

Compared with the general population, solid organ transplant recipients had almost a 6 times higher rate of severe COVID-19 (20.39 versus 3.44 per 100 person-years), with almost 5.5 times as high a rate of death alone (4.19 versus 0.77 per 100 person-years). Transplant recipients with severe COVID-19 were substantially younger (60.1 versus 66.5 y) and had more comorbidities. The rate of severe COVID-19 declined over time in the solid organ transplant population, with an incidence rate of 41.25 per 100 person-years in the first wave (January 25, 2020, to August 31, 2020) and 18.41 in the seventh wave (June 19, 2022, to November 30, 2022, Omicron era).

Conclusions

Solid organ transplant recipients remain at high risk of severe outcomes when they are infected with SARS-CoV-2. Resources and strategies to mitigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 exposure are needed in this vulnerable patient population.

Risk factors and multi-pathogen infections in kidney transplant recipients with omicron variant pneumonia: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an elevated risk of progressing to severe infections upon contracting COVID-19. We conducted a study on risk factors and multi-pathogen infections in KTRs with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

METHODS

KTRs were subjected to a thorough etiological evaluation. Whenever feasible, they were also provided with bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage to enable metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), ideally within a 48-hour window post-admission. We performed a retrospective analysis for pathogens and risk factors of KTRs with the COVID-19 virus variant Omicron.

RESULTS

We included thirty patients in our study, with sixteen exhibiting single infection of COVID-19 and fourteen experiencing co-infections, predominantly with Pneumocystis jirovecii. Notably, patients with severe cases demonstrated significantly elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 compared to those with moderate cases (P < 0.05). Furthermore, individuals whose conditions progressed had markedly higher baseline serum creatinine levels than those without such progression (P < 0.05). The presence of heart failure, acute exacerbation of renal dysfunction, and a history of opportunistic infections were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of deterioration and hospital admission due to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, as compared to the control group (P < 0.05). In subsequent follow-up analysis, the all-cause rehospitalization rate was observed to be 21.4%, with Pneumocystis jirovecii infection accounting for half of these cases.

CONCLUSION

Among KTRs, a significant coinfection rate of 47% was observed, with Pneumocystis jirovecii emerging as the predominant pathogen in these cases. The development of heart failure, acute exacerbation of chronic renal dysfunction, and a prior history of opportunistic infections have been identified as potential risk factors that may contribute to clinical deterioration in KTRs. Additionally, Pneumocystis jirovecii infection has been established as a critical factor influencing the rate of all-cause rehospitalization within this patient population.

Assessing antiviral treatment efficacy and risk factors for severe COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients during the Omicron subvariant-dominant period: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and even now that Omicron subvariants have become dominant, cases of severe disease are certain to occur. The aims of this retrospective study were to evaluate the efficacy of antiviral treatment for COVID-19 and to identify risk factors for severe disease in KTRs during Omicron subvariant-dominant periods.

METHODS

A total of 65 KTRs diagnosed with COVID-19 who received antiviral treatment between July 2022 and September 2023 were analyzed. Mild cases received oral molnupiravir (MP) as outpatient therapy, while moderate or worse cases received intravenous remdesivir (RDV) as inpatient therapy. In principle, mycophenolate mofetil was withdrawn and switched to everolimus. We investigated the efficacy of antiviral treatment and compared the clinical parameters of mild/moderate and severe/critical cases to identify risk factors for severe COVID-19.

RESULTS

Among 65 cases, 49 were mild, 6 were moderate, 9 were severe, and 1 was of critical severity. MP was administered to 57 cases; 49 (86%) improved and 8 (14%) progressed. RDV was administered to 16 cases; 14 (87%) improved and 2 (13%) progressed. Seventeen (26%) cases required hospitalization, and none died. Comparisons of the severe/critical group (n = 10) with the mild/moderate group (n = 55) demonstrated that the severe/critical group had a significantly higher median age (64 vs. 53 years, respectively; p = 0.0252), prevalence of diabetes (70% vs. 22%, respectively; p = 0.0047) and overweight/obesity (40% vs. 11%, respectively; p = 0.0393), as well as a significantly longer median time from symptom onset to initial antiviral therapy (3 days vs. 1 day, respectively; p = 0.0026). Multivariate analysis showed that a longer time from symptom onset to initial antiviral treatment was an independent risk factor for severe COVID-19 (p = 0.0196, odds ratio 1.625, 95% confidence interval 1.081-2.441).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that a longer time from symptom onset to initial antiviral treatment is associated with a higher risk of severe COVID-19 in KTRs. Initiating antiviral treatment as early as possible is crucial for preventing severe outcomes; this represents a valuable insight into COVID-19 management in KTRs.

Prevention and treatment strategies for kidney transplant recipients in the context of long-term existence of COVID-19

The sudden outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in early 2020 posed a massive threat to human life and caused an economic upheaval worldwide. Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) became susceptible to infection during the COVID-19 pandemic owing to their use of immunosuppressants, resulting in increased hospitalization and mortality rates. Although the current epidemic situation is alleviated, the long-term existence of COVID-19 still seriously threatens the life and health of KTRs with low immunity. The Omicron variant, a highly infectious but less-pathogenic strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has raised concerns among transplant physicians regarding managing KTRs diagnosed with this variant. However, currently, there are no clear and unified guidelines for caring for KTRs infected with this variant. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the ongoing research on drugs that can treat Omicron variant infections in KTRs and explore the potential of adjusting immunotherapy strategies to enhance their responsiveness to vaccines. Herein, we discuss the situation of KTRs since the emergence of COVID-19 and focus on various prevention and treatment strategies for KTRs since the Omicron variant outbreak. We hope to assist physicians in managing KTRs in the presence of long-term COVID-19 variants.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir versus sotrovimab for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir and sotrovimab in the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, medRxiv, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify relevant evidence up to December 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA).

RESULTS

Our search identified and included 13 studies involving 16166 patients. The meta-analysis revealed a significant difference between the molnupiravir and sotrovimab groups in terms of the mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 3.70). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of hospitalization rate (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.06), death or hospitalization rate (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.81, 2.83), and intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.07, 4.84). In terms of safety, molnupiravir was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.30).

CONCLUSION

The current findings indicate that sotrovimab may be more effective than molnupiravir in reducing the mortality rate in COVID-19 patients. However, no statistical difference was observed between the two treatments for other effectiveness outcomes. The certainty of evidence for these findings was rated as low or moderate. Further research is required to provide a better comparison of these interventions in treating COVID-19 patients.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of liver transplant recipients infected by Omicron during the opening up of the dynamic zero-coronavirus disease policy in China: A prospective, observational study

We analyzed the characteristics, risk factors, outcomes, and post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms in liver transplant recipients in China's late 2022 COVID-19 wave. Recipients with COVID-19 were enrolled from December 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023, and followed up until May 31, 2023. Baseline and characteristic data were collected. A total of 930 recipients were included, with a vaccination rate (non-mRNA) of 40.0%. Among 726 (78.1%) recipients with COVID-19, 641 (88.3%) patients were treated at home, 81 (11.2%) patients required hospitalization in general wards, 4 (0.6%) patients required intensive care, and 1 (0.1%) patient died because of COVID-19. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection was related to close contact with confirmed cases (P < .001) and the condition of end-stage kidney disease (P < .046). Older age, male sex, less vaccination, and hypertension were independent risk factors for hospitalization. Fatigue (36.9%) was the most common symptom post-COVID-19, followed by memory loss (35.7%) and sleep disturbance (23.9%). Two doses of vaccines had a protective effect against these post-COVID-19 symptoms (P < .05). During this Omicron outbreak, liver transplant recipients were susceptible to COVID-19, with frequent hospitalization but low mortality. Two doses of non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines could protect against liver transplant recipient hospitalization and post-COVID-19 symptoms.

Updated core competencies in pharmacoepidemiology to inform contemporary curricula and training for academia, government, and industry

PURPOSE

The first paper to specify the core content of pharmacoepidemiology as a profession was published by an ISPE (International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology) workgroup in 2012 (Jones JK et al. PDS 2012; 21[7]:677-689). Due to the broader and evolving scope of pharmacoepidemiology, ISPE considers it important to proactively identify, update and expand the list of core competencies to inform curricula of education programs; thus, better positioning pharmacoepidemiologists across academic, government (including regulatory), and industry positions. The aim of this project was to update the list of core competencies in pharmacoepidemiology.

METHODS

To ensure applicability of findings to multiple areas, a working group was established consisting of ISPE members with positions in academia, industry, government, and other settings. All competencies outlined by Jones et al. were extracted from the initial manuscript and presented to the working group for review. Expert-based judgments were collated and used to identify consensus. It was noted that some competencies could contribute to multiple groups and could be directly or indirectly related to a group.

RESULTS

Five core domains were proposed: (1) Epidemiology, (2) Clinical Pharmacology, (3) Regulatory Science, (4) Statistics and data science, and (5) Communication and other professional skills. In total, 55 individual competencies were proposed, of which 25 were new competencies. No competencies from the original work were dropped but aggregation or amendments were made where considered necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

While many core competencies in pharmacoepidemiology have remained the same over the past 10 years, there have also been several updates to reflect new and emerging concepts in the field.

Characteristics and Outcomes of US Veterans With Immunocompromised Conditions at High Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection With or Without Receipt of Oral Antiviral Agents

OBJECTIVES

Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir were the first oral antiviral agents to demonstrate reduced hospitalization or death in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but patients with immunocompromised conditions were not well-represented. The objective of this study was to characterize and compare the clinical outcomes of US veterans with immunocompromised conditions prescribed oral antivirals with those who did not receive oral antivirals for mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 active infection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, nationwide propensity-matched analysis of US veterans with immunocompromised conditions who developed documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was the composite of any hospitalization or death within 30 days of diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included 30-day comparative rates of (1) any hospitalization, (2) death, (3) intensive care requirement, and (4) subset analyses of outcomes by oral antiviral used and vaccination status.

RESULTS

The composite primary outcome was significantly lower in patients receiving oral antiviral therapy compared with those who did not (23/390 [5.9%] vs 57/390 [14.6%]; odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, .22-.61). This difference was driven largely by fewer deaths in the oral antiviral group (1/390 [0.3%] vs 19/390 [4.9%]; odds ratio, 0.05; 95% confidence interval, .007-.38). There was no significant difference in rate of intensive care requirement. The composite outcome was improved in vaccinated patients (completing the first series or first booster dose) who received oral antiviral agents compared with those who did not receive oral antiviral agents. Compared with those prescribed nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, patients given molnupiravir were older, had a higher incidence of cautions/contraindications, greater prevalence of tobacco use, and more cardiovascular complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was associated with lower incidences of hospitalization or death within 30 days of diagnosis in US veterans with immunocompromised conditions, regardless of vaccination status. These findings support the use of either oral antiviral in this patient population.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Heart Transplant Recipients and Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies: Experience, Lessons Learnt, and Future Challenges

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), including heart transplant (HT) recipients, infected with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at higher risk of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, or death when compared with general population. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have reduced COVID-19-related mortality rates from ~30% in the early pandemic to <3% in 2022 among HT recipients. We performed a retrospective chart review including adult HT recipients at Westchester Medical Center from January 1, 2020 to December 10, 2022, who received anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19, and those who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab for preexposure prophylaxis. Additionally, a comprehensive review of the literature involving SOTRs who received mAbs for COVID-19 was conducted. In this largest single-center study in this population, 42 adult HT recipients received casirivimab/imdevimab (36%), sotrovimab (31%), or bebtelovimab (29%) for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Among these recipients, no infusion-associated adverse effects, progression of disease, COVID-19-associated hospitalizations, or death were noted. Preexposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab was given to 63 HT recipients in a dedicated infusion center (40%), inpatient setting (33%), or at time of annual heart biopsy (27%). No immediate adverse events were noted. There were 11 breakthrough infections, all mild. Overall, the data suggests that HT recipients receiving mAbs have reduced rates of hospitalization, need for intensive care unit care, or death. Use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs in SOTRs is resource intensive and requires a programmatic team approach for optimal administration and to minimize any risk of disparities in their use.

Risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 despite vaccination in patients requiring treatment with immune-suppressive drugs: A nationwide cohort study of US Veterans

BACKGROUND

Patients taking immune-suppressive drugs are at increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), not fully ameliorated by vaccination. We assessed the contributions of clinical and demographic factors to the risk of severe disease despite vaccination in patients taking immune-suppressive medications for solid organ transplantation (SOT), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or psoriasis.

METHODS

Veterans Health Administration electronic health records were used to identify patients diagnosed with RA, IBD, psoriasis, or SOT who had been vaccinated against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, were subsequently infected, and had received immune-suppressive drugs within 3 months before infection. The association of severe (defined as hypoxemia, mechanical ventilation, dexamethasone use, or death) versus non-severe COVID-19 with the use of immune-suppressive and antiviral drugs and clinical covariates was assessed by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Severe COVID-19 was more common in patients with SOT (230/1011, 22.7%) than RA (173/1355, 12.8%), IBD (51/742, 6.9%), or psoriasis (82/1125, 7.3%). Age was strongly associated with severe COVID-19, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.04 (CI 1.03-1.05) per year. Comorbidities indicating chronic brain, heart, lung, or kidney damage were also associated with severity, aOR 1.35-2.38. The use of glucocorticoids was associated with increased risk (aOR 1.66, CI 1.39-2.18). Treatment with antivirals was associated with reduced severity, for example, aOR 0.28 (CI 0.13-0.62) for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

CONCLUSION

The risk of severe COVID-19 despite vaccination is substantial in patients taking immune-suppressive drugs, more so in patients with SOT than in patients with inflammatory diseases. Age and severe comorbidities contribute to risk, as in the general population. Oral antivirals were very beneficial but not widely used.

Oral antivirals for COVID-19 among patients with cancer

Purpose

Immunocompromised individuals, such as those diagnosed with cancer, are at a significantly higher risk for severe illness and mortality when infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) than the general population. Two oral antiviral treatments are approved for COVID-19: Paxlovid® (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) and Lagevrio® (molnupiravir). There is a paucity of data regarding the benefit from these antivirals among immunocompromised patients with cancer, and recent studies have questioned their efficacy among vaccinated patients, even those with risk factors for severe COVID-19.

Methods

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in preventing severe illness and death using our database of 457 patients with cancer and COVID-19 from Brown University-affiliated hospitals. 67 patients received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir and were compared to 56 concurrent controls who received no antiviral treatment despite being eligible to receive it.

Results

Administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir was associated with improved survival and lower 90-day all-cause and COVID-19-attributed mortality (p<0.05) and with lower peak O2 requirements (ordinal odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-2.56).

Conclusion

Acknowledging the small size of our sample as a limitation, we concluded that early antiviral treatment might be beneficial to immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with cancer, when infected with SARS-CoV-2. Larger-scale, well-stratified studies are needed in this patient population.

Sotrovimab in solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite widespread implementation of vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) can remain particularly vulnerable to this disease. The present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of sotrovimab in the treatment of SOTRs with COVID-19.

Methods

A search was performed of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar to gather relevant evidence through July 25, 2023. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias tool. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (ver. 3.0, Biostat) was employed for data analysis.

Results

Ten studies, involving a total of 1,569 patients, were included. The meta-analysis revealed significant differences between the patients administered sotrovimab and those treated with the standard of care. These differences were observed in mortality rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.67), hospitalization rate (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.62), the need for supplemental oxygen therapy (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51), and the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.70). However, no significant difference was observed between sotrovimab and other treatments regarding the rates of hospitalization or ICU admission (P>0.05). Regarding safety, sotrovimab was associated with a lower rate of adverse events compared to the absence of sotrovimab (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.86).

Conclusions

These results suggest that sotrovimab may improve efficacy outcomes among SOTRs with COVID-19. Nevertheless, additional high-quality trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Respiratory viral infections including COVID-19 in solid organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Respiratory viral infections are prevalent and contribute to significant morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We review updates from literature on respiratory viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in the SOT recipient.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the wider availability and use of molecular diagnostic tests, our understanding of the epidemiology and impact of respiratory viruses in the SOT population continues to expand. While considerable attention has been given to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the advances in prevention and treatment strategies of SARS-CoV-2 offered valuable insights into the development of new therapeutic options for managing other respiratory viruses in both the general and SOT population.

SUMMARY

Respiratory viruses can present with a diverse range of symptoms in SOT recipients, with potentially associated acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. The epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and treatment and preventive strategies for clinically significant RNA and DNA respiratory viruses in SOT recipients are reviewed. This review also covers novel antivirals, immunologic therapies, and vaccines in development for various community-acquired respiratory viruses.

Therapeutic strategy in the transplanted patient

The SARS-CoV-2 infection prognosis has dramatically changed as a result of population vaccination and the surge of omicron. However, there are still specific populations at risk of progression to severe diseases that require hospitalization or even at risk of death. The kidney transplant population is one of them. Consequently, when compatible symptoms appear, an early diagnosis should be sought in order to start specific antiviral treatment as soon as possible to avoid clinical deterioration of the patient. Antivirals have shown, in transplant patients, a decrease in the rate of hospitalization and death, especially with their early administration.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients: Experience with molnupiravir

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) constitute one of the groups at highest risk for the development of severe COVID-19. However, evidence on the effectiveness of treatments for SARS-CoV-2 infection in this group of patients is scarce. Molnupiravir is an orally administered antiviral drug that has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing the risk of progression to severe COVID-19 in high-risk outpatients, mainly in the unvaccinated population. Although its effectiveness is lower than that of other antivirals, on many occasions it is the only therapeutic option in transplant recipients given the absence of pharmacological interactions with immunosuppressive treatment, the oral route of administration and the good safety profile.

Oral Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Literature Review with a Focus on Real-World Evidence

Vaccines remain the cornerstone of medical prevention and are highly effective in reducing the risk of severe disease and death due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In the context of expanding the therapeutic armamentarium against COVID-19, molnupiravir (Lagevrio) and ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid) were developed, constituting the first effective oral treatments against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In this narrative review, we retrospectively inquired into the clinical trials and real-world studies investigating the efficacy of these agents. Overall, clinical trials and real-world studies have demonstrated the efficacy of both agents in reducing hospitalization and death rates in COVID-19 patients. As per current recommendations, their use is suggested in patients with mild to moderate symptoms who are at high risk of developing severe disease. Nevertheless, limited data exist regarding their efficacy in specific subpopulations, such as immunocompromised patients, those with severe kidney disease, pregnant women, and children.

Molnupiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 in immunocompromised participants: efficacy, safety, and virology results from the phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled MOVe-OUT trial

PURPOSE

Immunocompromised patients have a potentially increased risk for progression to severe COVID-19 and prolonged replication of SARS-CoV-2. This post hoc analysis examined outcomes among immunocompromised participants in the MOVe-OUT trial.

METHODS

In phase 3 of MOVe-OUT, non-hospitalized at-risk adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 were randomized to receive molnupiravir 800 mg or placebo twice daily for 5 days. Immunocompromised participants were identified based on prior/concomitant medications and/or medical history. All-cause hospitalization/death, adverse events, SARS-CoV-2 titers, infectivity, and RNA sequences were compared between immunocompromised participants who received molnupiravir or placebo and with non-immunocompromised participants.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of 1408 participants were considered immunocompromised. Compared to placebo, fewer molnupiravir-treated immunocompromised participants were hospitalized/died through Day 29 (22.6% [7/31] vs. 8.3% [2/24]), with fewer adverse events (45.2% [14/31] vs. 25.0% [6/24]). A larger mean change from baseline in SARS-CoV-2 RNA was observed with molnupiravir compared to placebo in non-immunocompromised participants (least squares mean [LSM] difference Day 5:  - 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]  - 0.47 to  - 0.15), while the mean change was comparable between treatment groups in immunocompromised participants (LSM difference Day 5: 0.23, 95% CI  - 0.71 to 1.17). Molnupiravir treatment was associated with increased clearance of infectious virus. Increased errors in viral nucleotide sequences in post-baseline samples compared to placebo support molnupiravir's mechanism of action and were not associated with observation of novel treatment-emergent amino acid substitutions in immunocompromised participants.

CONCLUSION

Although the study population was small, these data suggest that molnupiravir treatment for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in non-hospitalized immunocompromised adults is efficacious and safe and quickly reduces infectious SARS-CoV-2.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04575597.

Efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection after lung transplantation: a two center cohort study during the omicron era

PURPOSE

Lung transplant (LTx) recipients are at risk for poor outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of patients receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab and cilgavimab after LTx.

METHODS

All LTx recipients with outpatient visits from February 28th to October 31st, 2022 at two German centers were included. Baseline characteristics were recorded and patients followed until November 30rd, 2022. Infections with SARS-CoV-2, disease severity, and COVID-19-associated death were compared between patients with and without PrEP.

RESULTS

In total, 1438 patients were included in the analysis, and 419 (29%) received PrEP. Patients receiving PrEP were older and earlier after transplantation, had lower glomerular filtration rates, and lower levels of SARS-CoV-2-S antibodies. In total, 535 patients (37%) developed SARS-CoV-2 infection during a follow-up of median of 209 days. Fewer infections occurred in patients with PrEP during the study period (31% vs. 40%, p = 0.004). Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after PrEP occurred in 77 patients (19%). In total, 37 infections (8%) were severe or critical. No difference in severity of COVID-19 was observed between patients with and without PrEP. There were 15 COVID-19-associated deaths (n = 1 after PrEP). Compared to matched controls, there was a non-significant difference towards a lower risk for moderate to critical COVID-19 (p 0.184).

CONCLUSION

The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was lower in LTx recipients with PrEP. Despite being at higher risk for worse outcome severity of COVID-19 and associated mortality were similar in patients with and without PrEP.

Successful treatment of a case of COVID-19 pneumonia following kidney transplantation using paxlovid and tocilizumab

BACKGROUND

Since its initial detection in 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia has rapidly spread throughout the world in a global pandemic. However, reports of COVID-19 pneumonia among patients following kidney transplantation have been limited and no uniform treatment guidelines for these patients have yet to be established.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we report the case of a 39-year-old patient recovering from kidney transplantation who contracted perioperative COVID-19 pneumonia that was successfully controlled with oral paxlovid and a single intravenous drip infusion of tocilizumab following the discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs.

CONCLUSION

Given the rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections, clinicians should be aware of the potential for more cases of COVID-19 among patients following kidney transplantation and be familiar with appropriate treatment options and likely clinical outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) in the treatment of COVID-19: An updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Our study is aimed to access the efficacy and safety outcomes for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients treated with Paxlovid. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, databases were used to retrieve articles from 1 January 2020 to 1 January 2023. Article screening, quality evaluation and data extraction were completed and cross-checked. The meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were conducted using RevMan, StataMP, and TSA software. A total of 42 original articles were included. Overall meta-analysis results showed that for death, hospitalisation, death or hospitalisation, emergency department (ED) visit, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and extra oxygen requirement outcomes, every odds ratio (OR) was <1 and p < 0.05. For rebound outcome, the OR was >1 and p > 0.05. For adverse events (AEs) outcome, the OR was >1 and p < 0.05. In conclusion, Paxlovid effectively reduced the risks of death, hospitalisation, death or hospitalisation, ED visit, ICU admission, and extra oxygen requirement. There was no significant statistical difference considering rebound, but people should pay attention to possible AEs. However, for rebound and AEs outcomes, observations in certain subgroups suggested conclusions contrary to the overall meta-analysis. Trial sequential analysis indicated these two outcomes have a risk of false negative or false positive conclusions, so additional original studies are needed for further validation.

What Is the Efficacy of Sotrovimab in Reducing Disease Progression and Death in People with COVID-19 during the Omicron Era? Answers from a Real-Life Study

(1) Introduction: Since May 2021, sotrovimab has been available in Italy for early treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to prevent disease progression. However, some in vitro studies have questioned its efficacy on Omicron variants. Therefore, we aim to further investigate the efficacy of sotrovimab in real-life settings. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective study collecting medical records of people with SARS-CoV-2 infection evaluated in the infectious diseases units of Sassari, Foggia, and Bari, Italy. We included people with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with sotrovimab and people who did not receive any treatment in 2022. The primary study outcome was to evaluate the efficacy of sotrovimab in reducing disease progression (defined as the necessity of starting oxygen supplementation) and COVID-19-related death. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the safety of sotrovimab. (3) Results: We included 689 people; of them, 341 were treated with sotrovimab, while 348 did not receive any treatment. Overall, we registered 161 (23.4%) disease progressions and 65 (9.4%) deaths, with a significant difference between treated and not-treated people (p < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression, increasing age [OR for ten years increasing age 1.23 (95%CI 1.04-1.45)] was associated with a higher risk of disease progression. In addition, cardiovascular disease [OR 1.69 (1.01-2.80), fever [OR 3.88 (95%CI 2.35-6.38)], and dyspnea [OR 7.24 (95%CI 4.17-12.58)] were associated with an increased risk of disease progression. In contrast, vaccination [OR 0.21 (95%CI 0.12-0.37)] and sotrovimab administration [OR 0.05 (95%CI 0.02-0.11)] were associated with a lower risk of developing severe COVID-19. Regarding mortality, people with older age [OR for ten years increasing age 1.36 (95%CI 1.09-1.69)] had a higher risk of death. In addition, in the multivariate analysis, cardiovascular disease lost statistical significance, while people on chemotherapy for haematological cancer [OR 4.07 (95%CI 1.45-11.4)] and those with dyspnea at diagnosis [OR 3.63 (95%CI 2.02-6.50)] had an increased risk of death. In contrast, vaccination [OR 0.37 (95%CI 0.20-0.68)] and sotrovimab treatment [OR 0.16 (95%CI 0.06-0.42)] were associated with lower risk. Only two adverse events were reported; one person complained of diarrhoea a few hours after sotrovimab administration, and one had an allergic reaction with cutaneous rash and itching. (4) Conclusions: Our study showed that sotrovimab treatment was associated with a reduction of the risk of disease progression and death in SARS-CoV-2-infected people, 70% of whom were over 65 years and a with high vaccination rate, with excellent safety. Therefore, our results reinforce the evidence about the efficacy and safety of sotrovimab during the Omicron era in a real-world setting.

Evaluation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 monoclonal antibodies in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients across three major coronavirus disease 2019 variant waves

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to impact immunocompromised populations including solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown effectiveness in reducing COVID-19-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in SOTRs at different time frames in the COVID-19 pandemic; however, less data exist on the impact of mAbs for SOTRs across variant waves and with the advent of available COVID-19 vaccines.

METHODS

This retrospective study included SOTR outpatients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and received mAbs from December 2020 to February 2022 (n = 233); using in-house sequencing of clinical samples, we monitored the emergence of Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants. The primary outcome was a composite of 29-day COVID-19-related hospitalizations and ED visits. Prespecified secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary endpoint; for patients requiring hospitalization post-mAb administration, we describe their inpatient treatment.

RESULTS

A low percentage of SOTRs treated with mAb required hospitalization or an ED visit (14.6% overall); this did not differ across COVID-19 variants (p = .152). Hospitalization and ED visits did not significantly differ between abdominal and cardiothoracic SOTRs. For hospitalized patients, the majority received treatment with corticosteroids and few required intensive care unit (ICU) care.

CONCLUSION

Among SOTR outpatients with mild or moderate COVID-19 symptoms, early administration of mAb minimizes the need for hospital care. For patients requiring hospitalization, corticosteroids were common but patients experienced low rates of oxygen supplementation and ICU care. Use of mAbs in SOTRs should be considered early in the disease when therapy is available.

Impact of B Cell Depletion on COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplant recipients are patients at high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to being on immunosuppressive therapy. B cell depletion therapy, including rituximab, is an important strategy for ABO-incompatible transplants. However, knowledge about the effect of B cell depletion therapy on COVID-19 is lacking. Thirty kidney transplant recipients who developed COVID-19 were included in this study. To examine the impact of B cell depletion therapy, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between the background of the patients and the clinical outcome. Of the 30 patients, 13 received B cell depletion therapy. The median time between transplant and onset of COVID-19 was 6.1 years after transplantation; however, nine cases remained markedly depleted of CD19(+) cells (<4.0%). The patients were assigned to the normal (n = 21) and depletion groups (n = 9). Progression rates in the depletion and normal groups were 55.6% and 9.5%, respectively (p = 0.014). Furthermore, the survival rate was significantly lower in the depletion group (100% in the normal group vs. 66.7% in the depletion group; p = 0.021). B cell depletion therapy may have long-term effects and increase the risk of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.

Nirmatrelvir and ritonavir combination: an antiviral therapy for COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in late November 2021 presaged yet another stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Paxlovid, a co-packaged dosage form of two antiviral drugs (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir) developed by Pfizer, received its first FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and conditional marketing by European Medical Agency in patients at high risk of developing severe COVID-19.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the timeline of the drug nirmatrelvir from its discovery to authorization by FDA. After 1 year of its authorization, numerous studies and reports on paxlovid's use and post-use consequences are available. This review summarizes the complete journey of paxlovid from its development, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory approvals, ongoing clinical trials, and safety measures, followed by discussions on recent updates on drug-drug interactions, adverse effects, and relapse of COVID-19.

EXPERT OPINION

Paxlovid, a new oral antiviral therapy for COVID-19, has shown promising results in clinical trials and has the potential to be effective against the pandemic, particularly for individuals at high risk of severe illness. Comorbidity usage and pharmacovigilance will play a significant stake in the future of paxlovid development. Second-generation Mpro inhibitors play an important role in the upcoming problems associated with COVID-19.

Protective Effect of Vaccine Doses and Antibody Titers Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Patients undergoing kidney transplantation have a poor response to vaccination and a higher risk of disease progression of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The effectiveness of vaccine doses and antibody titer tests against the mutant variant in these patients remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a single medical center according to vaccine doses and immune responses before the outbreak. Among 622 kidney transplant patients, there were 77 patients without vaccination, 26 with one dose, 74 with two doses, 357 with three, and 88 with four doses. The vaccination status and infection rate proportion were similar to the general population. Patients undergoing more than three vaccinations had a lower risk of infection (odds ratio = 0.6527, 95% CI = 0.4324-0.9937) and hospitalization (odds ratio = 0.3161, 95% CI = 0.1311-0.7464). Antibody and cellular responses were measured in 181 patients after vaccination. Anti-spike protein antibody titer of more than 1,689.3 BAU/mL is protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio = 0.4136, 95% CI = 0.1800-0.9043). A cellular response by interferon-γ release assay was not correlated with the disease (odds ratio = 1.001, 95% CI = 0.9995-1.002). In conclusion, despite mutant strain, more than three doses of the first-generation vaccine and high antibody titers provided better protection against the omicron variant for a kidney transplant recipient.

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Adult Cardiac Transplantation: Impact, Interventions, and Implications

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adult heart transplantation. We highlight the decline in the number of adult transplantations performed throughout the pandemic as a consequence of restrictions imposed on individual programs and hospitals. There were challenges to maintaining cardiac transplant activity at multiple levels, including organ donation in intensive care units, logistical difficulties with organ procurement, and rapidly changing resource considerations at health system and jurisdictional levels. We also review the impact of COVID-19 on cardiac transplant recipients. Despite the high rates of morbidity and mortality observed during the initial phases of the pandemic among heart transplant patients infected with COVID-19, the availability of effective vaccines, pre-exposure prophylaxis, and specific antiviral therapies have drastically improved outcomes over time. Vaccines have proven to be safe and effective in reducing infections and illness severity, but specific considerations in the immunocompromised solid organ transplant population apply, including the need for additional booster doses to achieve sufficient immunisation. We further outline the strong rationale for vaccination before transplantation wherever possible. Finally, the COVID-19 response created a number of barriers to safe and efficient post-transplantation care. Given the need for frequent evaluation and monitoring, especially in the first several months after cardiac transplantation, the pandemic provided the impetus to improve virtual care delivery and explore noninvasive rejection surveillance through gene expression profiling. We hope that lessons learned will allow us to prepare and pivot effectively during future pandemics and health care emergencies.

SARS-CoV-2 spike codon mutations and risk of hospitalization after antispike monoclonal antibody therapy in solid organ transplant recipients

Neutralizing antispike monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies were highly efficacious in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalization. While severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants may harbor spike protein mutations conferring reduced in vitro susceptibility to these antibodies, the effect of these mutations on clinical outcomes is not well characterized. We conducted a case-control study of solid organ transplant recipients who received an antispike mAb for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and had an available sample from initial COVID-19 diagnosis for genotypic sequencing. Patients whose SARS-CoV-2 isolate had at least one spike codon mutation conferring at least fivefold decreased in vitro susceptibility were classified as resistant. Overall, 9 of 41 patients (22%) had at least one spike codon mutation that confers reduced susceptibility to the antispike mAb used for treatment. Specifically, 9 of 12 patients who received sotrovimab had S371L mutation that was predicted to confer a 9.7-fold reduced susceptibility. However, among 22 patients who required hospitalization, 5 had virus with resistance mutation. In contrast, among 19 control patients who did not require hospitalization, 4 also had virus-containing resistance mutations (p > 0.99). In conclusion, spike codon mutations were common, though mutations that conferred a 9.7-fold reduced susceptibility did not predict subsequent hospitalization after treatment with antispike mAb.

Comparative efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) with molnupiravir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To end this, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar were systematically searched to collect relevant evidence up to February 15, 2023. The risk of bias was evaluated using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Eighteen studies involving 57 659 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in terms of all-cause mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.67), all-cause hospitalization rate (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.54-0.69), death or hospitalization rate (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99), and negative polymerase chain reaction conversion time (mean difference = -1.55, 95% CI: -1.74 to -1.37). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of COVID-19 rebound (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.71-1.07). In terms of safety, although the incidence of any adverse events was higher in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir group (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.57-4.06), no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in terms of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.69-2.00). The present meta-analysis demonstrated the significant superiority of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir over molnupiravir in improving clinical efficacy in COVID-19 patients during the prevalence of Omicron variant. These findings, however, need to be further confirmed.

Association of Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir with reduced mortality and sepsis in hospitalized omicron patients: a territory-wide study

This study evaluates the association between antivirals (Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir) and all-cause and respiratory mortality and organ dysfunction among high-risk COVID-19 patients during an Omicron outbreak. Two cohorts, Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir versus control and Molnupiravir versus control, were constructed with inverse probability treatment weighting to balance baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of their use with all-cause mortality, respiratory mortality, and all-cause sepsis (a composite of circulatory shock, respiratory failure, acute liver injury, coagulopathy, and acute liver impairment). Patients recruited were hospitalized and diagnosed with the COVID-19 Omicron variant between February 22, 2022 and April 15, 2022, and followed up until May 15, 2022. The study included 17,704 patients. There were 4.67 and 22.7 total mortalities per 1000 person-days in the Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir and control groups respectively before adjustment (weighted incidence rate ratio, - 18.1 [95% CI - 23.0 to - 13.2]; hazard ratio, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.11-0.29]). There were 6.64 and 25.9 total mortalities per 1000 person-days in the Molnupiravir and control groups respectively before adjustment (weighted incidence rate ratio per 1000 person-days, - 19.3 [95% CI - 22.6 to - 15.9]; hazard ratio, 0.23 [95% CI 0.18-0.30]). In all-cause sepsis, there were 13.7 and 35.4 organ dysfunction events per 1000 person-days in the Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir and control groups respectively before adjustment (weighted incidence rate ratio per 1000 person-days, - 21.7 [95% CI - 26.3 to - 17.1]; hazard ratio, 0.44 [95% CI 0.38-0.52]). There were 23.7 and 40.8 organ dysfunction events in the Molnupiravir and control groups respectively before adjustment (weighted incidence ratio per 1000 person-days, - 17.1 [95% CI, - 20.6 to - 13.6]; hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI 0.58-0.69]). Among COVID-19 hospitalized patients, use of either Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir or Molnupiravir compared with no antiviral use was associated with a significantly lower incidence of 28-days all-cause and respiratory mortality and sepsis.

Real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, and sotrovimab on preventing hospital admission among higher-risk patients with COVID-19 in Wales: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, and sotrovimab with no treatment in preventing hospital admission or death in higher-risk patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the community.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of non-hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 using the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank.

SETTING

A real-world cohort study was conducted within the SAIL Databank (a secure trusted research environment containing anonymised, individual, population-scale electronic health record (EHR) data) for the population of Wales, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients with COVID-19 in the community, at higher risk of hospitalization and death, testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 16th December 2021 and 22nd April 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, and sotrovimab given in the community by local health boards and the National Antiviral Service in Wales.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause admission to hospital or death within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Cox proportional hazard model with treatment status (treated/untreated) as a time-dependent covariate and adjusted for age, sex, number of comorbidities, Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation, and vaccination status. Secondary subgroup analyses were by treatment type, number of comorbidities, and before and on or after 20th February 2022, when omicron BA.1 and omicron BA.2 were the dominant subvariants in Wales.

RESULTS

Between 16th December 2021 and 22nd April 2022, 7013 higher-risk patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Of these, 2040 received treatment with molnupiravir (359, 17.6%), nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (602, 29.5%), or sotrovimab (1079, 52.9%). Patients in the treatment group were younger (mean age 53 vs 57 years), had fewer comorbidities, and a higher proportion had received four or more doses of the COVID-19 vaccine (36.3% vs 17.6%). Within 28 days of a positive test, 628 (9.0%) patients were admitted to hospital or died (84 treated and 544 untreated). The primary analysis indicated a lower risk of hospitalization or death at any point within 28 days in treated participants compared to those not receiving treatment. The adjusted hazard rate was 35% (95% CI: 18-49%) lower in treated than untreated participants. There was no indication of the superiority of one treatment over another and no evidence of a reduction in risk of hospitalization or death within 28 days for patients with no or only one comorbidity. In patients treated with sotrovimab, the event rates before and on or after 20th February 2022 were similar (5.0% vs 4.9%) with no significant difference in the hazard ratios for sotrovimab between the time periods.

CONCLUSIONS

In higher-risk adult patients in the community with COVID-19, those who received treatment with molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, or sotrovimab were at lower risk of hospitalization or death than those not receiving treatment.

COVID-19 Management Strategies in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk of severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). If left untreated, it results in high rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission and death. Early diagnosis of COVID-19 is essential to ensure the early administration of therapeutics. Treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 with remdesivir, ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, or an anti-spike neutralizing monoclonal antibody may prevent progression to severe and critical COVID-19. Among patients with severe and critical COVID-19, treatment with intravenous remdesivir and immunomodulation is recommended. This review article discusses strategies in the management of solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19.

Clinical efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies in preventing hospitalisation and mortality among patients infected with Omicron variants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Until now, the treatment protocols for COVID-19 have been revised multiple times. The use and approval of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for COVID-19 treatment represent exceptional achievements in modern science, technology and medicine. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron evasion of pre-existing immunity represents a serious public health problem nowadays. This systematic review with meta-analysis provided comprehensive and up-to-date evidence of the clinical efficacy of therapeutic anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs against Omicron subvariants in COVID-19 patients and included 10 articles. The prevalence of hospitalisation among Omicron-positive patients treated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs was 2.8% (89/3169) while it controls (Omicron-positive patients treated with other therapies) 11% (154/1371). There was a statistically significantly different number of hospitalisations between the two studied groups in favour of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs treated group. (OR = 0.56, 95% CI OR = 0.41-0.77, p < 0.001, respectively). Eight deaths (0.30%) out of 2619 Omicron-positive patients occurred in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs treated group, while in the control group (Omicron-positive patients treated with other therapies), 27 patients died out of 1401 (1.93%). There was a significantly different number of deaths between the two studied groups in favour of Omicron-positive patients treated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs (OR = 0.38, 95% CI OR = 0.17-0.85, p = 0.020). Using sotrovimab in treating Omicron-positive patients indicated a reduction of hospitalisation and mortality for 49% and 89% in favour of sotrovimab, respectively (OR = 0.51, 95% CI OR = 0.34-0.79, p = 0.002; OR = 0.11, 95% CI OR = 0.03-0.39, p = 0.001). We could only provide evidence of the positive impact in reducing hospitalisation and mortality rates when anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs were used to treat patients infected with Omicron variants BA.1 or BA.2 and not on other Omicron variants.

Real-World Study on Effectiveness of Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir–Ritonavir in Unvaccinated Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases with Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection Managed in Out-Patient Setting

While molnupiravir (MOV) and nirmatrelvir–ritonavir (NMV-r) were developed for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 infection, there has been a lack of data on the efficacy among unvaccinated adult patients with chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis. A territory-wide retrospective cohort study was conducted in Hong Kong to investigate the efficacy of MOV and NMV-r against severe outcomes of COVID-19 in unvaccinated adult patients with chronic respiratory diseases. A total of 3267 patients were included. NMV-r was effective in preventing respiratory failure (66.6%; 95% CI, 25.6–85.0%, p = 0.007), severe respiratory failure (77.0%; 95% CI, 6.9–94.3%, p = 0.039) with statistical significance, and COVID-19 related hospitalization (43.9%; 95% CI, −1.7–69.0%, p = 0.057) and in-hospital mortality (62.7%; 95% CI, −0.6–86.2, p = 0.051) with borderline statistical significance. MOV was effective in preventing COVID-19 related severe respiratory failure (48.2%; 95% CI 0.5–73.0, p = 0.048) and in-hospital mortality (58.3%; 95% CI 22.9–77.4, p = 0.005) but not hospitalization (p = 0.16) and respiratory failure (p = 0.10). In summary, both NMV-r and MOV are effective for reducing severe outcomes in unvaccinated COVID-19 patients with chronic respiratory diseases.

Efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, medRxiv, and Google Scholar were searched to identify the relevant evidence up to November 10, 2022. The reference lists of key studies were also scanned to find additional records. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane tools for assessing the risk of bias. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 3.0 was employed for data analysis. Twenty-three studies involving 314 353 patients were included in the analysis. The findings of the meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the Paxlovid and no-Paxlovid groups in terms of mortality rate (odds ratio [OR] = 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14-0.45), hospitalization rate (OR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.24-0.69), polymerase chain reaction negative conversion time (mean difference [MD] = -2.46; 95% CI: -4.31 to -0.61), and hospitalization or death rate (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.06-0.46). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of COVID-19 rebound (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.67-1.04), emergency department visit (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.45-1.24), intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.13-1.01), and adverse events (OR = 2.20; 95% CI: 0.42-11.47). The results of the present study support the efficacy and safety of Paxlovid in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Further research is needed to investigate the COVID-19 rebound after Paxlovid treatment.

COVID-19 associated acute transplant failure after AB0-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation - a case report

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppressive therapy is associated with an increased risk of severe courses of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with frequently delayed viral clearance. We report a case of an acute kidney transplant failure in persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with absolute B-cell depletion after administration of rituximab for AB0-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 34-year-old unvaccinated patient is diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection four months after kidney transplantation. With only mild symptoms and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 44 ml/min/1.73 m², therapy with molnupiravir was initially given. Within the next eight weeks, transplant biopsies were performed for acute graft failure. These showed acute T-cell rejection with severe acute tubular epithelial damage with only mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (BANFF cat. 4 IB), and borderline rejection (BANFF cat. 3). A therapy with prednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulins was performed twice. With unchanged graft failure, the third biopsy also formally showed BANFF cat. 4 IB. However, fluorescence in situ hybridization detected SARS-CoV-2 viruses in large portions of the distal tubules. After nine weeks of persistent COVID-19 disease neither anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG nor a SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immune response could be detected, leading to the administration of sotrovimab and remdesivir. Among them, SARS-CoV-2 clearance, detection of IgG, and improvement of graft function were achieved.

CONCLUSION

Lack of viral clearance can lead to complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection with atypical manifestations. In kidney transplant patients, before initiating therapy, the differential diagnoses of "rejection" and "virus infection" should be weighed against each other in an interdisciplinary team of nephrologists, infectious diseases specialists and pathologists.

Clinical Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients during the Omicron Wave

At the start of the pandemic, liver transplant recipients (LTR) were at high risk of developing severe COVID-19. Here, the outcomes of breakthrough infections in fully vaccinated LTR (n = 98) during the Omicron wave were assessed. In most patients, a mild disease course was observed, but 11 LTR (11.2%) required hospitalization for COVID-19-related complications. All patients survived. The LTR requiring hospitalization were older (67 years vs. 54 years; p < 0.001), had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (9 vs. 5; p < 0.001), and a lower anti-S RBD titer (Roche Elecsys) prior to infection (508.3 AU/mL vs. 2044 AU/mL; p = 0.03). Long-lasting symptoms for ≥4 weeks were reported by 37.5% of LTR (30/80). Risk factors in LTR included female sex (p = 0.01; Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) (1.5-16.5)) and dyspnea (p = 0.009; OR = 7.2 (95% CI (1.6-31.6)) during infection. Post-infection high anti-S RBD antibody levels were observed in LTR, and healthy controls (HC), while the cellular immune response, assessed by interferon-gamma release assay (EUROIMMUN), was significantly lower in LTR compared with HC (p < 0.001). In summary, in fully vaccinated LTR, SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections during the Omicron wave led to mild disease courses in the majority of patients and further boosted the humoral and cellular hybrid anti-SARS-CoV-2-directed immune response. While all patients survived, older and multimorbid LTR with low baseline antibody titers after vaccination still had a substantial risk for a disease course requiring hospitalization due to COVID-19-related complications.

COVID-19 in kidney transplantation-implications for immunosuppression and vaccination

COVID-19 pandemic continues to challenge the transplant community, given increased morbidity and mortality associated with the disease and poor response to prevention measures such as vaccination. Transplant recipients have a diminished response to both mRNA and vector-based vaccines compared to dialysis and the general population. The currently available assays to measure response to vaccination includes commercially available antibody assays for anti-Spike Ab, or anti- Receptor Binding Domain Ab. Positive antibody testing on the assays does not always correlate with neutralizing antibodies unless the antibody levels are high. Vaccinations help with boosting polyfunctional CD4+ T cell response, which continues to improve with subsequent booster doses. Ongoing efforts to improve vaccine response by using additional booster doses and heterologous vaccine combinations are underway. There is improved antibody response in moderate responders; however, the ones with poor response to initial vaccination doses, continue to have a poor response to sequential boosters. Factors associated with poor vaccine response include diabetes, older age, specific immunosuppressants such as belatacept, and high dose mycophenolate. In poor responders, a decrease in immunosuppression can increase response to vaccination. COVID infection or vaccination has not been associated with an increased risk of rejection. Pre- and Post-exposure monoclonal antibodies are available to provide further protection against COVID infection, especially in poor vaccine responders. However, the efficacy is challenged by the emergence of new viral strains. A recently approved bivalent vaccine offers better protection against the Omicron variant.

What Is New in Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19 in Renal Transplant Patients? A Report from an ESOT Meeting on the Topic

I should highlight that this manuscript is not a formal review on the topic, but a report from an ESOT meeting held on 22 June 2022. The assumption of immunosuppressants exposes kidney transplant recipients to the risk of infections, including COVID-19 infection. A transplant patient having COVID-19 infection raises several questions, including whether the immunosuppressive therapy should be reduced with the consequent risk of favoring acute rejections. Patient vaccination before transplantation is probably the gold standard to avoid the risk of COVID-19 infection after transplantation. In the case of transplant patients, three measures may be undertaken: vaccination, use of monoclonal antibodies and use of therapeutic antiviral small molecules. Concerning vaccination, it is still debated which one is the best and how many doses should be administered, particularly considering the new variants of the virus. The onset of virus variants has stimulated researchers to find new active vaccines. In addition, not all transplant patients develop antibodies. An alternative prophylactic measure to be principally used for patients that do not develop antibodies after vaccination is the use of monoclonal antibodies. These drugs may be administered as prophylaxis or in the early stage of the disease. Finally, the small antiviral molecules may be used again as prophylaxis or treatment. Their major drawbacks are their interference with immunosuppressive drugs and the fact that some of them cannot be administered to patients with low eGFR.