Modeling the conversion between specific IgE test platforms for nut allergens in children and adolescents

Identification of Potentially Tolerated Fish Species by Multiplex IgE Testing of a Multinational Fish-Allergic Patient Cohort

BACKGROUND

Although recent studies indicated that many fish-allergic patients may safely consume certain fish species, no clinical guidelines are available for identification of the exact species tolerated by specific patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether multiplex immunoglobulin E (IgE) testing reveals potentially tolerated fish through absence of IgE to parvalbumin (PV) and extracts from specific species.

METHODS

Sera from 263 clinically well-defined fish-allergic patients from Austria, China, Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway, and Spain were used in a research version of the ALEX² multiplex IgE quantification assay. Specific IgE to PVs from 10 fish species (9 bony and 1 cartilaginous), and to extracts from 7 species was quantified. The IgE signatures of individual patients and patient groups were analyzed using SPSS and R.

RESULTS

Up to 38% of the patients were negative to cod PV, the most commonly used molecule in fish allergy diagnosis. Forty-five patients (17%) tested negative to PVs but positive to the respective fish extracts, underlining the requirement for extracts for accurate diagnosis. Between 60% (Spain) and 90% (Luxembourg) of the patients were negative to PV and extracts from ray, a cartilaginous fish, indicating its potential tolerance. Up to 21% of the patients were negative to at least 1 bony fish species. Of the species analyzed, negativity to mackerel emerged as the best predictive marker of negativity to additional bony fish, such as herring and swordfish.

CONCLUSIONS

Parvalbumins and extracts from multiple fish species relevant for consumption should be used in fish-allergy diagnosis, which may help identify potentially tolerated species for individual patients.

Four clinical phenotypes of cow’s milk protein allergy based on dairy product specific IgE antibody types in North China

Background

Cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA) is a common allergy. Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated cow’s milk allergy is associated with a high mortality risk and poor prognosis. The study aims to investigate whether there are different clinically CMPA phenotypes in China and to explore the association between CMPA phenotypes and specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies against different dairy products.

Methods

Serum sIgE against different animal milk and cow’s milk products and different milk components was measured by an allergen array. Four CMPA classifications were identified by the presence of serum sIgE: boiled milk-positive, yogurt-positive, buttermilk-positive, and raw milk-positive.

Results

Among the 234 participants included in the study, 9 were boiled milk sIgE-positive, 50 were yogurt sIgE-positive, 17 were buttermilk sIgE-positive, and 158 were only raw milk sIgE-positive. The boiled milk-positive group had the highest levels of raw milk sIgE and casein sIgE antibodies, followed sequentially by the yogurt-positive, buttermilk-positive, and raw milk-positive groups. The boiled milk group observed the highest levels of sIgE against raw milk, casein, α-lactalbumin, and β-lactoglobulin. These levels differed significantly from those in the other three groups. Allergic symptoms were distributed differently among the four study groups. The percentages of allergic patients with gastrointestinal tract symptoms in the above mentioned four groups ranged from high to low, and the percentages of patients with skin symptoms in the four groups ranged from low to high, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on dairy product sIgE antibody levels associated with different milk components and various clinical allergic symptom tendencies, we could distinguish four CMPA phenotypes.

Real-life evaluation of molecular multiplex IgE test methods in the diagnosis of pollen associated food allergy

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of food allergies is challenging, as combining information from specific IgE (sIgE)-sensitization pattern and skin prick tests (SPTs) with clinical history is necessary for a personalized management of allergic patients. The aim of this study was to compare two molecular tests, the ImmunoCAP ISAC (ISAC) and the Allergy Explorer, version 2 (ALEX² ) in the context of pollen food syndrome (PFS) diagnosis in a real-life scenario, to assess the benefit of multiplex testing in PFS patients.

METHODS

Diagnosis of food allergy was performed in 53 patients. Allergen-sIgE concentrations were measured with ISAC and ALEX² . Results for sIgE were statistically compared with each other, with SPT results and with clinical presentation of the patients.

RESULTS

Using ISAC as reference test for sIgE measurements, the average sensitivity of ALEX² for PR-10 allergens was 83.2% and the average specificity 88.0%. If only low sIgE concentrations were included, the sensitivity was 60.8% and the specificity 91.1%. Apple and hazelnut sensitizations were confirmed in most patients by concordance of sIgE and SPT results. Significant correlations were shown between clinical symptoms and Mal d 1- and Gly m 4-sIgE levels measured by both tests and for Cor a 1-sIgE levels measured by ALEX² . In eight patients, profilin related symptoms were supported by Hev b 8-sensitization.

CONCLUSION

Multiplex testing is beneficial to understand patient-specific individual sensitization profiles and to providing personalized management recommendations. In the future, custom-designed test kits might enable reducing costs of multiplex testing for specific patient groups without compromising the diagnostic value.

Feasibility of the ALEX multiplex platform in the diagnosis of nut allergy from a Mediterranean population

BACKGROUND

ALEX multiplex platform has been recently commercialized but its clinical utility as quantitative technique respect to ImmunoCAP-singleplex as the reference method has not yet been confirmed on patients suffering from nut allergy and co-sensitization to different nuts.

METHODS

58 serum samples from patients with nut allergy from a Mediterranean population were assayed in parallel by ALEX-multiplex and ImmunoCAP-singleplex techniques. Patients were diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and positive skin prick tests (SPTs). The following whole extracts were compared between both techniques: walnut, hazelnut, peanut, almond, pistachio and sunflower seed; besides the recombinant Pru p 3. A qualitative and quantitative study was carried out.

RESULTS

Both techniques had similar sensitivities respect to whole extracts from walnut, hazelnut and peanut as well as to Pru p 3 (p > 0.05). However for whole extracts from almond, pistachio and sunflower seed the sensitivity obtained by ALEX was much lower than ImmunoCAP (9.09 % vs 88.63 %; 14.81 vs 70.37 %; and 8.51 % vs 88.88 %; respectively). The concordance between both techniques showed only a substantial agreement for Pru p 3 (k = 0.791); moderate agreement for hazelnut and peanut (k = 0.550 and k = 0.544, respectively); fair agreement for walnut (k = 0.386) and poor agreement for almond, pistachio and sunflower seed (k < 0.2). Quantitative analysis showed that ImmunoCAP for walnut, peanut and sunflower seed had higher mean values than ALEX. Relationships were significant for all specific IgE levels except to for almond, pistachio and sunflower seed.

CONCLUSIONS

ALEX platform is a suitable technique to patients with nut allergy from the Mediterranean area except to for those suffering from allergy to almond, pistachio and sunflower seed.

Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase is a biomarker of severe anaphylaxis in children

BACKGROUND

There is limited ability to predict the severity of allergic reactions in children. Data derived predominantly from adults have implicated the platelet-activating factor pathway as a potential contributor to severe anaphylaxis. In this study, we sought to prospectively assess involvement of key components of the platelet-activating factor pathway in pediatric patients with anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Forty-six pediatric patients (<18 years) presenting with acute anaphylaxis were assessed. Anaphylaxis severity was graded and serum anaphylaxis markers were measured acutely and in 36 children who returned for follow-up >4 weeks after their acute presentation. These markers were compared with pediatric laboratory reference sera.

RESULTS

Severe anaphylaxis was experienced by 12/46 (26%) and mild-moderate anaphylaxis in 34/46 (74%) children. Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) activity was inversely associated with severe anaphylaxis: 9/12 children with severe anaphylaxis had reduced PAF-AH activity as compared with 14/34 with mild-moderate anaphylaxis (p < .05). Furthermore, 3/3 children who required intensive care had markedly reduced mean PAF-AH (nmol/ml/min) (13.73, 95%CI: 7.42-20.03) versus 20/23 who required ward/emergency department care (17.81, 95%CI: 16.80-18.83; p < .05). In children with anaphylaxis, PAF-AH during acute anaphylaxis was unchanged relative to the child's basal levels (mean, 17.26, 95%CI: 16.10-18.42 vs 17.50, 95%CI: 16.21-18.78, p = .63) and was lower than healthy pediatric controls (mean 19.21; 95%CI:18.21-20.21; p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Decreased serum PAF-AH activity is a biomarker of severe anaphylaxis. Levels of this enzyme do not change from basal levels during acute anaphylaxis. Our results show that PAF-AH is a biomarker of anaphylaxis severity in children. This key regulatory enzyme may modulate susceptibility to severe anaphylaxis.

ALEX versus ISAC multiplex array in analyzing food allergy in atopic children

ALEX multiplex array is a relatively new multiplex allergy test which analyses more than 120 allergen extracts and 170 molecular components. ISAC is the most used and studied multiplex array to date, offering 112 molecular components. In ten atopic children with multiple food allergies good agreement was observed between ALEX and ISAC sIgE results for nearly all shared food components. Presence of larger number of allergens in ALEX could help clinicians to improve personalized dietary advice. However more positive sensitizations with unknown clinical relevance were found by ALEX, potentially increasing clinical complexity. Pediatric allergists should be aware of this, especially in young atopic children with (severe) eczema who have not introduced all sorts of food yet.

A comprehensive comparison between ISAC and ALEX2 multiplex test systems

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of type I hypersensitivity is based on anamnesis, provocation as well as blood- and skin testing. Multiplex specific IgE (sIgE) testing enables determination of sIgE antibodies against multiple recombinant or purified natural allergen components. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the novel ALEX^2® (Allergy Explorer, ALEX² test introduced on the market November 2019) multiplex platform and to compare it with the ImmunoCAP ISAC^® test system.

METHODS

Serum samples of 49 patients, routinely determined with ISAC, were selected based on positive results covering in total most of the 112 ISAC components. Cohen's kappa, negative percent agreement (NPA), and positive percent agreement (PPA) of ALEX² data compared to ISAC data (as a non-reference standard) were computed for those allergen components present on both platforms (n=103). Furthermore, in some samples sIgE results against allergen extracts and/or -components tested with either ImmunoCAP^® (ThermoFisher) or IMMULITE^® (Siemens) were available and compared to ALEX² results.

RESULTS

The overall agreement between ISAC and ALEX² common allergen components was 94%. NPA and PPA were respectively 95 and 90%. Kappa values differed for specific allergen groups and varied between 0.60 and 0.92 showing moderate to almost perfect agreement. Of the qualitative discrepancies between ALEX² and ISAC, 59% were related to weak positive results i.e. results under 1 kUA/L or 1 ISU, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The method comparison between ISAC and ALEX² multiplex tests showed a high concordance for those allergen components present on both platforms.

Multiplex component-based allergen macroarray test is useful to predict clinical reactivity to tree nuts in children

BACKGROUND

In tree nut (TN) allergy, singleplex tests showed the diagnostic utility of rAna o 3, rCor a 14/nCor a 9, and nJug r 1/nJug r 4 for cashew/pistachio, hazelnut, and walnut allergies, respectively. However, disadvantages of the tests include high costs and excessive blood sampling in multi-sensitized patients, and a limited number of components. We investigated the utility of a multiplex macroarray (i.e., the ALEX² test) in TN allergy.

METHODS

In 169 children, skin prick test, the component- and extract-specific IgEs of TNs were investigated for clinical reactivity and tolerance.

RESULTS

The predictors (AUC = 0.962-0.749) of clinical reactivity to cashew, pistachio, hazelnut, and walnut were rPis v 1/rAna o 3, rPis v 1/rAna o 3/nPis v 2/nPis v 3, rCor a 14/nCor a 11/nCor a 9, and nJug r 1/nJug r 2/nJug r 6/nJug r 4, respectively. More than 93% of the patients with clinical reactivity to pistachio/cashew, hazelnut and walnut had positivity of (≥0.3 kU_A/L) rPis v 1/rAna o 3, rCor a 14 and nJug r 1/nJug r 2, respectively. The highest accuracies of clinical reactivity to culprit nut were obtained with combination of rPis v 1, sIgE and SPT positivities for cashew/pistachio, rPis v 1 ≥ 1.0 kU_A/L for pistachio, rCor a 14 ≥ 1.0 kU_A/L for hazelnut and combination of nJug r 1 and nJug r 2 positivities for walnut, respectively. Also, higher concentrations of rPis v 1 (≥15.0 kU_A/L), rCor a 14 (≥5.0 kU_A/L) and nJug r 1/nJug r 2 (≥15.0 kU_A/L) had %100 specificity and PPV in predicting clinical reactivity to cashew, hazelnut and walnut, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiplex macroarray test is useful and reliable in the diagnosis of TN allergy in children, confirms and expands existing knowledge, and can be used as a stand-alone tool in the bottom-up diagnostic approach.

Validation of a commercial allergen microarray platform for specific immunoglobulin E detection of respiratory and plant food allergens

BACKGROUND

As the use of multiplex-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) detection methods becomes increasingly widespread, proper comparative validation assessments of emerging new platforms are vital.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and technical performance of a newly introduced microarray platform, Allergy Explorer (ALEX) (MacroArray Diagnostics), in the diagnosis of pollen (cypress, grass, olive), dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), mold (Alternaria alternata), fruit (apple, peach), and nut (walnut, hazelnut and peanut) allergies and to compare it with those of the ImmunoCAP Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC) 112 microarray and the ImmunoCAP singleplex method (ThermoFisher Scientific).

METHODS

We enrolled 153 patients with allergy and 16 controls without atopy. The sIgE assays were conducted using ISAC112, ALEX version 2 (ALEX2), and ImmunoCAP for whole extracts and major components. Technical validation of ALEX2 was performed by measuring repeatability and interassay, interbatch, and interlaboratory reproducibility.

RESULTS

When measured globally (detection by 1 or more allergen components), ALEX2 had adequate sensitivity and specificity for most of the allergens studied, comparable in general with that of ISAC112 (except for olive pollen and walnut) and similar to that of ImmunoCAP whole extract measurements. Component-by-component analysis revealed comparable results for all techniques, except for Ole e 1 and Jug r 3, in both ISAC112 and ImmunoCAP comparisons, and Alt a 1, when compared with ISAC112. Continuous sIgE levels correlate with sIgE by ImmunoCAP. Good reproducibility and repeatability were observed for ALEX2.

CONCLUSION

ALEX2 has sound technical performance and adequate diagnostic capacity, comparable in general with that of ISAC112 and ImmunoCAP.

The Major Peanut Allergen Ara h 2 Produced in Nicotiana benthamiana Contains Hydroxyprolines and Is a Viable Alternative to the E. Coli Product in Allergy Diagnosis

Peanut allergy is a potentially life-threatening disease that is mediated by allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies. The major peanut allergen Ara h 2, a 2S albumin seed storage protein, is one of the most dangerous and potent plant allergens. Ara h 2 is posttranslationally modified to harbor four disulfide bridges and three hydroxyprolines. These hydroxyproline residues are required for optimal IgE-binding to the DPYSPOHS motifs representing an immunodominant IgE epitope. So far, recombinant Ara h 2 has been produced in Escherichia coli, Lactococcus lactis, Trichoplusia ni insect cell, and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast expression systems, which were all incapable of proline hydroxylation. However, molecular diagnosis of peanut allergy is performed using either natural or E. coli-produced major peanut allergens. As IgE from the majority of patients is directed to Ara h 2, it is of great importance that the recombinant Ara h 2 harbors all of its eukaryotic posttranslational modifications. We produced hydroxyproline-containing and correctly folded Ara h 2 in the endoplasmic reticulum of leaf cells of Nicotiana benthamiana plants, using the plant virus-based magnICON® transient expression system with a yield of 200 mg/kg fresh biomass. To compare prokaryotic with eukaryotic expression methods, Ara h 2 was expressed in E. coli together with the disulfide-bond isomerase DsbC and thus harbored disulfide bridges but no hydroxyprolines. The recombinant allergens from N. benthamiana and E. coli were characterized and compared to the natural Ara h 2 isolated from roasted peanuts. Natural Ara h 2 outperformed both recombinant proteins in IgE-binding and activation of basophils via IgE cross-linking, the latter indicating the potency of the allergen. Interestingly, significantly more efficient IgE cross-linking by the N. benthamiana-produced allergen was observed in comparison to the one induced by the E. coli product. Ara h 2 from N. benthamiana plants displayed a higher similarity to the natural allergen in terms of basophil activation due to the presence of hydroxyproline residues, supporting so far published data on their contribution to the immunodominant IgE epitope. Our study advocates the use of N. benthamiana plants instead of prokaryotic expression hosts for the production of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2.

From Allergen Molecules to Molecular Immunotherapy of Nut Allergy: A Hard Nut to Crack

Peanuts and tree nuts are two of the most common elicitors of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy. Nut allergy is frequently associated with systemic reactions and can lead to potentially life-threatening respiratory and circulatory symptoms. Furthermore, nut allergy usually persists throughout life. Whether sensitized patients exhibit severe and life-threatening reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis), mild and/or local reactions (e.g., pollen-food allergy syndrome) or no relevant symptoms depends much on IgE recognition of digestion-resistant class I food allergens, IgE cross-reactivity of class II food allergens with respiratory allergens and clinically not relevant plant-derived carbohydrate epitopes, respectively. Accordingly, molecular allergy diagnosis based on the measurement of allergen-specific IgE levels to allergen molecules provides important information in addition to provocation testing in the diagnosis of food allergy. Molecular allergy diagnosis helps identifying the genuinely sensitizing nuts, it determines IgE sensitization to class I and II food allergen molecules and hence provides a basis for personalized forms of treatment such as precise prescription of diet and allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). Currently available forms of nut-specific AIT are based only on allergen extracts, have been mainly developed for peanut but not for other nuts and, unlike AIT for respiratory allergies which utilize often subcutaneous administration, are given preferentially by the oral route. Here we review prevalence of allergy to peanut and tree nuts in different populations of the world, summarize knowledge regarding the involved nut allergen molecules and current AIT approaches for nut allergy. We argue that nut-specific AIT may benefit from molecular subcutaneous AIT (SCIT) approaches but identify also possible hurdles for such an approach and explain why molecular SCIT may be a hard nut to crack.

Basophil activation test shows high accuracy in the diagnosis of peanut and tree nut allergy: The Markers of Nut Allergy Study

BACKGROUND

Peanut and tree nut allergies are the most important causes of anaphylaxis. Co-reactivity to more than one nut is frequent, and co-sensitization in the absence of clinical data is often obtained. Confirmatory oral food challenges (OFCs) are inconsistently performed.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) in diagnosing peanut and tree nut allergies.

METHODS

The Markers Of Nut Allergy Study (MONAS) prospectively enrolled patients aged 0.5-17 years with confirmed peanut and/or tree nut (almond, cashew, hazelnut, pistachio, walnut) allergy or sensitization from Canadian (n = 150) and Austrian (n = 50) tertiary pediatric centers. BAT using %CD63⁺ basophils (SSClow/CCR3pos) as outcome was performed with whole blood samples stimulated with allergen extracts of each nut (0.001-1000 ng/mL protein). BAT results were assessed against confirmed allergic status in a blinded fashion to develop a generalizable statistical model for comparison to extract and marker allergen-specific IgE.

RESULTS

A mixed effect model integrating BAT results for 10 and 100 ng/mL of peanut and individual tree nut extracts was optimal. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.98 for peanut, 0.97 for cashew, 0.92 for hazelnut, 0.95 for pistachio, and 0.97 for walnut. The BAT outperformed sIgE testing for peanut or hazelnut and was comparable for walnut (AUROC 0.95, 0.94, 0.92) in a sub-analysis in sensitized patients undergoing OFC.

CONCLUSIONS

Basophil activation test can predict allergic clinical status to peanut and tree nuts in multi-nut-sensitized children and may reduce the need for high-risk OFCs in patients.