Flow-based basophil activation test in immediate drug hypersensitivity. An EAACI task force position paper

Physiochemical and functional evaluation of the first-in-class anti-cancer IgE antibody drug, MOv18, through process development and good manufacturing practice production

Antibodies used for cancer therapy are monoclonal IgGs, but tumor-targeting IgE antibodies have shown enhanced effector cell potency against cancer in preclinical models. Research-grade recombinant IgE antibodies have been generated and studied for several decades. The recent Phase 1 clinical trial of the first-in-class MOv18 IgE, however, necessitated the inaugural process development and scaled manufacture of a recombinant IgE to clinical quality standards. During the process development and scaled Good Manufacturing Practice production, we demonstrate the retention of glycosylation state, biophysical profile, and functional characteristics of MOv18 IgE, including Fc-mediated mast cell degranulation and tumor cell killing. Assessment of manufacturing parameters shows expected pH, purity, concentration, and stability properties, as well as below threshold levels of known biological manufacturing contaminants. We confirm the suitability of the pipeline described for generating intact, functionally active, clinical-grade material for this novel therapeutic class as an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), with comparable characteristics to the original research-grade antibody. Furthermore, we screened patient blood ex vivo for potential type I hypersensitivity reaction to MOv18 IgE, using the basophil activation test, to identify patients not predicted to be hypersensitive to MOv18 IgE administration. This study supports the production of functionally active clinical grade (IMP) recombinant IgE and paves the way for the development of a new therapeutic antibody class for a range of antigenic specificities and disease settings.

Flow cytometry-based basophil and mast cell activation tests in allergology: State of the art

The major challenge in allergy diagnosis is development of accessible and reliable diagnostics that can predict the clinical outcome following exposure to culprit allergen(s) or cross-reactive molecules and identification of safer alternatives than the current state-of-the-art methods. There is accumulating evidence that flow-based analyses for the quantification of activated basophils and mast cells subsequent to in vitro challenge (the basophil and mast cell activation test [BAT/MAT] or basophil activation test [BAT] and mast cell activation test [MAT]) could meet the diagnostic requirements for IgE-dependent allergies, drug hypersensitivities, and subsets of autoimmune urticaria. Furthermore, the BAT and MAT have found application in research and other nondiagnostic fields. However, appropriate use of the BAT and MAT requires understanding of the diversity of the source materials used and degranulation metrics to ensure correct test performance and interpretation of results. In this review, we provide the main applications and limitations of the BAT and MAT, as performed thus far.

Basophil activation test; User's manual

Immediate allergic responses, orchestrated by basophils and mast cells, are pivotal in severe allergic reactions. The flow cytometry-based Basophil Activation Test (BAT) is a clinically important assay for testing allergic reactions using CD63 and CD203c as endpoints. The test measures the concentration dependent response to the allergens providing a functional readout of the patients' allergies. BAT is presently in clinical use within the Unites States as well as several other countries for the diagnosis and monitoring of allergies, most commonly against food allergens. This article details assay validation, both analytical and clinical with reference to existing regulations/recommendations through CAP, CLIA, NYS and CLSI on issues including accuracy, precision, linearity, reportable range, reference range, analytical sensitivity & specificity, pre-analytical considerations, the utility of the assay in diagnosis or monitoring and interpretation of the results; and the assay's limitations. The BAT plays a crucial role in assessing patient suitability for food challenges and therapies such as oral immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy or omalizumab and can aid in predicting treatment outcomes. We further review the current research on advancing the test, focused on improvements in its clinical utility. Continuous efforts are warranted for enhanced regulatory oversight and comprehensive clinical validation, ensuring BAT's seamless integration into diverse clinical settings.

Basophil activation test is a complementary tool in the diagnosis of immediate reactions to platinum salts and taxanes

BACKGROUND

Delabelling pathways offer confirmatory diagnosis and can prevent unnecessary second-line therapies or drug desensitization procedures after chemotherapeutic hypersensitivity reactions (CHT-HSRs). However, these pathways rely on risky in vivo tests. Data on whether in vitro tests could be helpful are scarce. We assessed the role of basophil activation test (BAT) in the diagnosis of HSRs to platin salts (PSs) and taxanes (TXs) in a well-defined population featuring varied endophenotypes and severities of HSRs.

METHODS

We conducted a 3-year-long multicentric, prospective study with 121 suspected-immediate CHT-HSR patients. The allergy workup included clinical history (initial reaction based on Type I, cytokine release syndrome, and mixed phenotype's symptoms and if unable to fit in any of these, as "indeterminate"), skin testing (ST), and drug provocation testing (DPT), provided risk assessment was favorable. Final diagnosis classified patients as "hypersensitive," "non-hypersensitive," or "inconclusive." We performed BAT using CD63 and CD203c as activation markers in patients and controls. Patients underwent DPT regardless of BAT results to prevent bias.

RESULTS

ST positivity significantly correlated with skin involvement, Type I phenotype, cancer recurrence, and lifetime exposures before reactions. DPTs were negative in all indeterminate phenotype patients (p = .02) and those considered low-risk, whereas they were negative in 62% moderate-risk patients. 55% were confirmed as hypersensitive (mainly Type I reactions, p < .0001), 24% as non-hypersensitive (mainly TXs and indeterminate phenotypes), and 21% as inconclusive. BAT showed 79% sensitivity in Type I IgE-mediated reactions to PSs with a high correlation to ST.

CONCLUSIONS

BAT is a promising tool for delabelling and endotyping CHT-HSRs, especially Type I reactions to PSs, possibly identifying patients at risk of positive DPT. ST seems useful in confirming CHT-HSRs, especially PS-induced reactions, and DPT remains the gold standard, being essential even in moderate-risk patients.

Allergy to PEG (polyethylene glycol) - sensitivity of basophil activation test with COVID-19 mRNA-vaccine BNT162B2

Basophil activation test (BAT) with COVID-19 mRNA vaccine seems particularly suitable for detecting sensitization to polyethylene glycol (PEG) in patients with PEG allergy. It was the aim of this study to determine the cutoffs for BAT using BNT162B2 (Comirnaty®) in a larger group of PEG allergic patients and controls. 10 PEG allergic patients and 10 controls were studied. BAT was performed using anti-CCR3 for basophil identification and anti-CD63 to assess basophil activation. Incubations with BNT162B2 at four different concentrations were performed. Basophil activation was significantly higher in PEG allergic patients compared to controls at the higher concentrations used. ROC curves showed best results with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 100% with a cutoff of 5% CD63+ basophils at a concentration of 4.5 µg/ml. Controls showed no positive results. In our group of PEG allergic patients, a concentration of 4.5 µg/ml BNT162B2 with a cutoff of 5% CD63+ basophils was the most suitable condition for identifying patients with a sensitization to PEG. Allergological work-up of PEG allergic patients including BAT with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles might play a role in the future when these substances will be used for other vaccines and cancer immunotherapies.

Applications of basophil activation test in paediatric allergic diseases

Basophilic granulocytes, containing and releasing histamine after a specific allergy stimulation, are directly involved in IgE-mediated allergic reactions. CD63 is a transmembrane protein of secretory lysosomes of basophils and its upregulation is related with the release of histamine to the extracellular space during IgE-mediated allergic reactions. Basophil activation test (BAT) measures the activation of circulating basophils upon the in vitro stimulation of living blood cells with specific allergens. Such a test is particularly safe and reproducible and has recently emerged as a new promising diagnostic tool for allergic diseases. BAT can be used to diagnose food allergy and represents a promising alternative to oral food challenge tests, especially in children as it is less invasive, safer, and cheaper than the gold standard tests. As a biomarker of tolerance and reactivity, it is also useful to monitor natural resolution and clinical response to immune-modulatory treatments. Regarding drug allergies, BAT is even the only possible applicable diagnostic tool for allergy reactions to some drugs, because of the lack of alternative test, or given that those commonly used are unreliable, or equivocal. Additionally, BAT allows to screen patients with more active urticarial and identify Hymenoptera-allergic patients with negative venom-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E. In respiratory allergic diseases, BAT can facilitate the diagnosis of local allergic rhinitis and evaluate basophil allergen sensitivity in allergic asthma. Although IgE-sensitization in allergic asthma is usually demonstrated by skin prick test and specific IgE, those tests do not predict the clinical allergy contribution to asthma pathogenesis. To date, the potential of BAT in the diagnostic work-up of allergic diseases is well established, but a better standardization of its use is needed. This narrative review summarizes the state-of-the-art BAT technology and applications in pediatric allergic diseases, focusing on immune-related mechanisms and the BAT real clinical utility.

Basophil FceRI expression-A management tool in anti-IgE treatment of allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

Immune-based therapy targeting immunoglobulin E (IgE), anti-IgE treatment, has emerged as an adjunct treatment for children with severe allergic asthma. After start of anti-IgE treatment, an effect of the treatment cannot be monitored by Total-IgE, because current methods measure both bound and free IgE molecules. Basophil activation test may be very useful for monitoring anti-IgE treatment efficacy. The objective of this paper is to evaluate if basophil activation test is applicable in regulating the anti-IgE treatment.

METHODS

A case series of 20 children with IgE-mediated severe allergic asthma were treated according to guidelines with anti-IgE (Omalizumab). Blood samples were drawn for total IgE, specific IgE, number of IgE receptors (FcεRI) and basophil sensitivity were measured at baseline before anti-IgE treatment and 4 months after initiation of anti-IgE treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 19 out of 20 children had statistically significant and clinically relevant effects of anti-IgE treatment on symptom score, lung function and medication. All 20 children had a significant reduction in basophil allergen sensitivity and the number of IgE receptors (FcεRI) on blood basophils. Anti-IgE treatment was found to be well controlled by measuring basophil allergen sensitivity and FceRI density on blood basophils.

CONCLUSION

This cohort study demonstrates a promising method, measuring basophil allergen sensitivity and in particular blood basophil FceRI density, concerning the monitoring of anti-IgE treatment in different clinical situations. There are no randomized controlled trials evaluating this method in clinical settings.

Optimization of Basophil Activation Test in the Diagnosis and Qualification for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in Children with Respiratory Allergy to the House Dust Mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus

The aim of this study was to optimize a basophil activation test in the detection of allergy to the house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in children with allergic respiratory diseases. This study involved 32 cases, 13 girls and 19 boys aged 4-17 years, with perennial asthma or allergic rhinitis caused by D. pteronyssinus. The control group consisted of 13 girls and 19 boys aged 4-17 years with seasonal allergic asthma or rhinitis provoked by Timothy or birch pollen. House dust mite (HDM) allergy was excluded in the controls based on their medical history, skin prick test (SPT) results and sIgE determination. In all patients, a basophil activation test (BAT) was performed with five dilutions of D. pteronyssinus allergen (the dilution series ranged from 22.5 to 0.00225 ng/mL). The results were analyzed by using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to determine the optimal allergen concentrations, outcome measures and cut-off points that would differentiate most accurately between HDM-allergic and non-allergic patients. As a "gold standard", criteria for allergen-specific immunotherapy with D. pteronyssinus or respective pollens were applied by an experienced pediatric allergist following the guidelines of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. The highest diagnostic efficiency was yielded by the protocol assuming a cut-off value of 9.76% activated basophils after activation with a single allergen concentration of 2.25 ng/mL (sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 100%). This protocol yielded 3 (4.7%) misclassifications, all false negative, when compared with the "gold standard". There was a strong correlation with the BAT results at 22.5, 2.25 and 0.225 ng/mL (respectively r = 0.90 and r = 0.78, p < 0.001), as well as between the BAT at 2.25 ng/mL and SPT (r = 0.82, p < 0.001) and between the SPT and sIgE levels (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). High cross-reactivity between D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae was confirmed based on the BAT at 22.5 ng/mL (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the BAT showed very good concordance with the result of a meticulous process of decision-making that combined validated allergy tests (SPT, sIgE) with expert guidelines, specialist knowledge and experience. Facing the risk of the incorrect qualification of patients for costly, long-lasting and potentially risky allergen-specific immunotherapy, the inclusion of a basophil activation test into diagnostic process seems fully justified.

IgE-Mediated Cannabis Allergy and Cross-Reactivity Syndromes: A Roadmap for Correct Diagnosis and Management

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

With increased access and decriminalization of cannabis use, cases of IgE-dependent cannabis allergy (CA) and cross-reactivity syndromes have been increasingly reported. However, the exact prevalence of cannabis allergy and associated cross-reactive food syndromes (CAFS) remains unknown and is likely to be underestimated due to a lack of awareness and insufficient knowledge of the subject among health care professionals. Therefore, this practical roadmap aims to familiarize the reader with the early recognition and correct management of IgE-dependent cannabis-related allergies. In order to understand the mechanisms underlying these cross-reactivity syndromes and to enable personalized diagnosis and management, special attention is given to the molecular diagnosis of cannabis-related allergies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The predominant signs and symptoms of CA are rhinoconjunctivitis and contact urticaria/angioedema. However, CA can also present as a life-threatening condition. In addition, many patients with CA also have distinct cross-reactivity syndromes, mainly involving fruits, vegetables, nuts and cereals. At present, five allergenic components of Cannabis sativa (Can s); Can s 2 (profilin), Can s 3 (a non-specific lipid protein), Can s 4 (oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2 oxygen), Can s 5 (the Bet v 1 homologue) and Can s 7 (thaumatin-like protein) have been characterized and indexed in the WHO International Union of Immunological Sciences (IUIS) allergen database. However, neither of them is currently readily available for diagnosis, which generally starts by testing crude extracts of native allergens. The road to a clear understanding of CA and the associated cross-reactive food syndromes (CAFS) is still long and winding, but well worth further exploration.

Basophil Activation Test Is Inferior to Provocation Test in Diagnosing Aspirin Hypersensitivity

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic of aspirin (ASA) hypersensitivity is largely based on provocation tests. However, they have significant limitations including influence of medications, necessity of hospitalization, and safety issues. Basophil activation test (BAT) seems to be a promising in vitro alternative. It has already proven to be a useful tool for diagnosing IgE-mediated allergy to certain food and airborne allergens as well as insects venoms. The aim of the study was to assess performance of BAT in diagnosing aspirin hypersensitivity in comparison with current golden standard (oral provocation test, OPT).

METHODS

The study group comprised 148 adult patients with suspicion of aspirin hypersensitivity, including 51 (36%) with chronic urticaria, 73 (51%) with asthma, and 55 (39%) with chronic sinusitis. The control group was 10 healthy adult patients who used NSAIDs during preceding year with good tolerance. BAT with ASA was conducted in all the participants. Additionally, in the study group, OPT was performed with cumulative dose of 1,000 mg of ASA.

RESULTS

Out of 148 study group participants, 114 underwent BAT and ASA provocation with conclusive results acquired in both tests. In this group, the threshold for positive BAT was 4.9%. Sensitivity and specificity of BAT were found to be 55.9% and 75%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 77% and a negative predictive value of 54%. The highest sensitivity (78%) was found in subgroup patients with chronic urticaria, while specificity was highest in the subgroup with chronic respiratory diseases (87%).

CONCLUSION

Despite significant advantages of BAT such as safety, no influence of drugs, and objectivity, its performance makes it inferior to current standard in ASA hypersensitivity.

Mast cell versus basophil activation test in allergy: Current status

In the past two decades, we witnessed the evolution of the basophil activation test (BAT) from mainly research applications to a potential complementary diagnostic tool to document IgE-dependent allergies. However, BAT presents some technical weaknesses. Around 10%-15% of tested patients are non-responders, BAT can be negative immediately post-reaction and the use of fresh basophils, ideally analysed within 4 h of collection, restricts the number of tests that can be performed per sample. The need for fresh basophils is especially limiting when conducting batch analyses and interlaboratory comparisons to harmonize BAT methodology. These limitations significantly hinder the wider application of BAT and urge the development of alternative testing, such as the mast cell activation test (MAT). The essential difference between BAT and MAT is the heterogeneity of the starting material used to perform the assays. Mast cells are tissue-resident, so cannot be easily accessed. Current alternative sources for functional studies are generating primary human mast cells, differentiated from donor progenitor cells, or using immortalized mast cell lines. Hence, the methodological approaches for MAT are not only vastly different from BAT, but also different among MAT protocols. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of BAT and MAT assays, dedicating special attention to elucidating the key differences between the cellular sources used and provides an overview of studies hitherto performed comparing BAT and MAT in the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food and drug allergies.

Knowledge mapping and global trends of drug hypersensitivity from 2013 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

Drug hypersensitivity is a major global public health issue with a significant increase in prevalence in populations. Here, we provide a deep insight into the frontier hotspot and future direction in the field of drug hypersensitivity.

METHODS

A knowledge map is portrayed based on publications related to drug hypersensitivity from Web of Science Core Collection using CiteSpace. Co-occurrence relationships of countries, institutes, authors, journals, references, and keywords are constructed. According to the co-occurrence relationships, hotspots and future trends are overviewed.

RESULTS

The United States ranked first in the world and China with the second highest publications was the only developing country. Torres, Mayorga, and Blanca were highly productive authors. Harvard University was the institution with the most research publications. Keywords co-occurrence analysis suggested applications in emerging causes, potential mechanisms, and clinical diagnosis as the research hotspots and development frontiers.

CONCLUSION

Research on drug hypersensitivity is in a rapid development stage and an emerging trend in reports of anaphylaxis to polyethylene glycols is identified. Developing algorithms for understanding the standardization process of culprit drugs, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic methods will be the focus of future direction. In addition, a better understanding of the mechanisms to culprit drugs with immunological precise phenotypic definitions and high-throughput platforms is needed.