"I feel reassured, but there is no guarantee." How do women with a future childbearing desire respond to active surveillance of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2? A qualitative study

Human papillomavirus genotypes and risk of persistence and progression in women undergoing active surveillance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2

BACKGROUND

In recent years, active surveillance has been introduced as an alternative to excisional treatment in younger women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 because regression rates are high and excisional treatment is associated with increased risk of preterm birth. However, early identification of women at increased risk of persistence/progression is important to ensure timely treatment. Evidence is limited on biomarkers that may be used to identify women at increased risk of persistence/progression.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe human papillomavirus HPV type-specific persistence/progression in women undergoing active surveillance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a historical cohort study of women aged 23 to 40 years diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 at Aarhus University Hospital from 2000 to 2010. Women were identified through the Danish Pathology Data Bank (DPDB) and were considered as undergoing active surveillance if they had a first record of a cervical biopsy within 2 years after index diagnosis and no loop electrosurgical excision procedure before this. Human papillomavirus genotyping was performed on archived tissue samples using the HPV SPF10-DEIA-LiPA25 system (DNA ELISA [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay] HPV SPF10 kit and RHA HPV SPF10-LiPA25 kit). Persistence/progression was defined as having a record of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade ≥2 in the DPDB determined on the last and worst diagnosis on a biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimen during follow-up. We estimated the relative risk (95% confidence interval) of persistence/progression using a modified Poisson model.

RESULTS

A total of 455 women were included. Two-thirds were aged ≤30 years (73.8%) at index diagnosis, and nearly half had a high-grade index cytology (48.8%). Overall, 52.2% of all women had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade ≥2 during follow-up; 70.5% were human papillomavirus-16-positive and 29.5% were positive for other human papillomavirus types. Human papillomavirus-16 was associated with a significantly higher risk of persistence/progression (relative risk, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.95) compared with non-human papillomavirus-16. The risk of persistence/progression was highest in human papillomavirus-16-positive women with a high-grade index cytology compared with human papillomavirus-16-positive women with a low-grade cytology (relative risk, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.61), whereas no differences were observed across age groups.

CONCLUSION

The highest risk of persistence/progression was observed among human papillomavirus-16-positive women, particularly those with associated high-grade cytology. These findings suggest that early excisional treatment should be considered in this group of women.

Risk of progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in human papillomavirus-vaccinated and unvaccinated women: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Many countries have implemented active surveillance (ie, leaving the lesion untreated) as an option among younger women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 because regression rates are high and excisional treatment increases the risk for preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies. However, early identification of women at increased risk for progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse is important to ensure timely treatment. Because women who have received a human papillomavirus vaccine have a lower risk for cervical cancer, they may have a lower risk for progression of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate if women who received a human papillomavirus vaccine and who are undergoing active surveillance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 are less likely to progress to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse when compared with women who did not receive the vaccine.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a population-based cohort study in Denmark using data from national health registers. We identified all women aged 18 to 40 years who were undergoing active surveillance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020. Women with a previous record of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, hysterectomy, or a loop electrosurgical excision procedure were excluded. Exposure was defined as having received ≥1 dose of a human papillomavirus vaccine at least 1 year before the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 diagnosis. We used cumulative incidence functions to estimate the risk for progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse within 28 months using hysterectomy, emigration, and death as competing events. We used modified Poisson regression to calculate crude and adjusted relative risks of progression during the 28-month surveillance period. Results were stratified by age at vaccination and adjusted for index cytology, disposable income, and educational level.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 7904 women of whom 3867 (48.9%) were vaccinated at least 1 year before a diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2. At the time of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 diagnosis, women who were vaccinated were younger (median age, 25 years; interquartile range, 23-27 years) than those who were not (median age, 29 years; interquartile range, 25-33 years). The 28-month cumulative risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse was significantly lower among women who were vaccinated before the age of 15 years (22.9%; 95% confidence interval, 19.8-26.1) and between the ages of 15 and 20 years (31.5%; 95% confidence interval, 28.8-34.3) when compared with women who were not vaccinated (37.6%; 95% confidence interval, 36.1-39.1). Thus, when compared with women who were not vaccinated, those who were vaccinated before the age of 15 years had a 35% lower risk for progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (adjusted relative risk, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.75), whereas women who were vaccinated between the ages of 15 and 20 years had a 14% lower risk (adjusted relative risk, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.95). For women who were vaccinated after the age of 20 years, the risk was comparable with that among women who were not vaccinated (adjusted relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.09).

CONCLUSION

Women who were vaccinated and who were undergoing active surveillance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 had a lower risk for progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse during 28 months of follow-up when compared with women who were not vaccinated but only if the vaccine was administered by the age of 20 years. These findings may suggest that the human papillomavirus vaccination status can be used for risk stratification in clinical management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2.

Untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and subsequent risk of cervical cancer: population based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the long term risk of cervical cancer in women with untreated (that is, undergoing active surveillance) or immediately treated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2).

DESIGN

Nationwide population based historical cohort study.

SETTING

Danish healthcare registries.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with CIN2 diagnosed in 1998-2020 and aged 18-40 years at diagnosis, who had either active surveillance or immediate treatment with large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). Women with a previous record of CIN2 or worse or LLETZ were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

A Weibull survival model for interval censored time-to-event data was used to estimate the cumulative risk of cervical cancer. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to adjust estimates for age, index cytology, calendar year, and region of residence.

RESULTS

The cohort included 27 524 women with CIN2, of whom 12 483 (45%) had active surveillance and 15 041 (55%) had immediate LLETZ. During follow-up, 104 cases of cervical cancer were identified-56 (54%) in the active surveillance group and 48 (46%) in the LLETZ group. The cumulative risk of cervical cancer was comparable across the two groups during the active surveillance period of two years. Thereafter, the risk increased in the active surveillance group, reaching 2.65% (95% confidence interval 2.07% to 3.23%) after 20 years, whereas it remained stable in the LLETZ group at 0.76% (0.58% to 0.95%).

CONCLUSIONS

Undergoing active surveillance for CIN2, thereby leaving the lesion untreated, was associated with increased long term risk of cervical cancer compared with immediate LLETZ. These findings show the importance of continued follow-up of women having active surveillance.

Impact of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and treatment on IVF/ICSI outcomes

STUDY QUESTION

Does treatment selection for cervical lesions affect the outcome of IVF/ICSI?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There was no difference in pregnancy outcome between treated and untreated groups, or between different types of IVF/ICSI treatment.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and HPV-induced cervical lesions are associated with decreased fertility, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) treatment may increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Between 2018 and 2020, 190 women with infertility who had abnormal HPV screening or cytology results prior to IVF/ICSI, and were diagnosed with CIN2/CIN3 by colposcopy biopsy at a tertiary hospital, were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study with follow-up until 31 December 2021.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Patients with infertility who were diagnosed with CIN2/CIN3 by colposcopy biopsy were divided into the treatment and expectant management groups. The treatment group was divided into two intervention subgroups: the ablative therapy group and the surgical treatment group. The baseline data, number of oocytes retrieved, and rates of fertilization, high-quality embryos, positive serum HCG, clinical pregnancy, abortion, live birth, and cumulative pregnancy were compared among groups.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Among the 190 patients included in the study, 152 were diagnosed with CIN2, and 38 patients had CIN3. There was no significant difference in the baseline data between the treatment and expectant groups. The time from confirmed lesions to the onset of gonadotrophin administration in the surgical treatment group was significantly longer than in the ablative therapy group and the expectant group (P = 0.007 and P = 0.024, respectively). For the treatment and expectant groups, respectively, the average number of oocytes retrieved (12.95 ± 8.77; 13.32 ± 9.16), fertilization rate (71.01 ± 23.86; 64.84 ± 26.24), and high-quality embryo rate (48.93 ± 30.72; 55.17 ± 34.13) did not differ, and no differences were detected between the different treatment subgroups. There were no differences among groups in rates of HCG positivity, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth, or cumulative pregnancy. The live birth rate in the surgical treatment group was slightly higher than that in the expectant groups (77.78% versus 66.67%), but the difference was not statistically significant. The 3-year cumulative pregnancy rates in the surgical treatment and expectant groups were 58.19% and 64.00%, respectively.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This is a retrospective study, which by nature can include selection bias, and the number of cases in the expectant group was <30, which may result in a false-negative result owing to the small sample size.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

For patients with CIN2/CIN3, the treatment of cervical lesions does not affect the outcome of IVF/ICSI. Patients with CIN2 can enroll for IVF/ICSI cycles, with close follow-up to prevent the progression of cervical lesions, in order to avoid further delay in starting ART. For patients with CIN3, ovulation induction and embryo cryopreservation can be initiated as soon as possible after cervical lesions are treated, and frozen-thawed embryo transfer can be carried out 9-12 months later.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was funded by the Key Clinical Projects of the Peking University Third Hospital (to Y.W., BYSYZD2021014). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Distinct mechanism of cervical cancer cell death caused by the investigational new drug SHetA2

Drug-targetable vulnerabilities of cancer cells include their dependence on heat shock proteins (HSPs) to support elevated mitochondrial metabolism and counteract cell death factors. The investigational new drug SHetA2 targets these vulnerabilities in ovarian and endometrial cancer cells by disrupting complexes of the mortalin HSP with its client proteins (mitochondrial support proteins, metabolic enzymes, p53) leading to mitochondrial leakage of cytochrome c and apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Our objective was to evaluate the roles of mitochondrial damage and another SHetA2-target HSP protein, cytoplasmic heat shock cognate 70 (hsc70), in the mechanism of SHetA2 killing of cervical cancer cells. Cervical cancer cells responded to SHetA2 with excessive mitophagy that did not deter AIF leakage into the cytoplasm. Then, hsc70 was unable to prevent cytoplasmic AIF nuclear translocation and promotion of DNA damage and cell death, because SHetA2 disrupted hsc70/AIF complexes. The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis found that overexpression of hsc70, but not mortalin, was associated with worse cervical cancer patient survival. Use of specific inhibitors documented that AIF and mitophagy, but not caspases, contributed to the mechanism of SHetA2-induced cell death in cervical cancer cells. As validation, excessive mitophagy and lack of caspase activation were observed in SHetA2-inhibited xenograft tumors.