Short-term efficacy of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis - experience in 130 patients

Predictive Factors for Efficacy of Oral Tacrolimus Induction Therapy in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis Patients: Large Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (TAC), a calcineurin inhibitor, is used for remission induction therapy in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC), with short-term efficacy and related predictive factors shown in previous cohort studies. However, most studies reported data for only a limited number of patients enrolled from a single center. We performed a large multicenter retrospective cohort study to identify factors related to prediction of clinical remission in UC patients treated with oral TAC.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with moderate to severe UC treated with oral TAC as induction therapy at 7 institutions between April 2009 and March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients who received TAC for induction were analyzed, of whom 123 (56.9%) showed clinical remission at week 12. Logistic regression analysis indicated that previous or current use of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antibodies (odds ratio [OR], 0.259; P = .006), and concomitant treatment with 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) at the baseline (OR, 0.268; P = .005) were independent predictive factors correlated with failure of clinical remission, whereas higher levels of C-reactive protein (OR, 1.124; P = .014) predicted achievement of clinical remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this multicenter study clearly indicate the efficacy of TAC induction therapy for patients with moderate to severe UC. Notably, previous or current use of anti-TNF-α antibodies was associated with poor achievement of clinical remission by week 12.

Protective effect of FKBP12 on dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in mice as a tacrolimus receptor

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a multifactorial intestinal disease with a high incidence. In recent years, there has been an urgent need for pleiotropic drugs with a clear biosafety profile. Tacrolimus (TAC) is an immunosuppressant with stronger in vivo effects and better gastrointestinal absorption and is considered a potential treatment for UC. FKBP12 is a mediator of TAC immunosuppression; however, it is unclear whether it can participate in the development of UC in combination with TAC. The purpose of this study is to preliminarily validate the function of FKBP12 by establishing dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced UC model and TAC treatment. The results revealed that TAC was effective in alleviating DSS-induced UC symptoms such as body weight and disease activity index (DAI). TAC significantly protects colonic tissue and attenuates DSS-induced histomorphological changes. In addition, FKBP12 is down-regulated in the intestinal tissue of DSS-induced UC mice and in serum samples of UC patients. In conclusion, our study revealed that FKBP12 may act as a TAC receptor to have anti-inflammatory and protective effects on DSS-induced UC in mice, which will provide a new option for the treatment of UC.

Efficacy of Switching to Adalimumab for Maintenance of Remission Following Induction Therapy with Tacrolimus in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (TAC) effectively induces remission in refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, TAC therapy usually lasts for 3 months. Although azathioprine (AZA) is often used in maintenance therapy, the relapse rate remains high. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) for remission maintenance in patients with UC after induction therapy with TAC.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC who achieved clinical remission after 3 months of TAC therapy with endoscopic non-mucosal healing (Cohort A). After TAC discontinuation, the remission maintenance rate up to 1 year after starting ADA therapy was examined. We retrospectively enrolled patients with UC treated with TAC (Cohort B). Among patients in clinical remission after TAC treatment for 3 months, those who received AZA as remission maintenance therapy after TAC discontinuation constituted the AZA group. Patients in Cohort A who received ADA and AZA as remission maintenance therapy after TAC discontinuation constituted the ADA + AZA group. We compared the remission maintenance rates in the AZA and ADA + AZA groups for up to 5 years after TAC discontinuation.

RESULTS

In Cohort A, of the 46 patients with UC treated with TAC, 17 were eligible for analysis after receiving ADA as remission maintenance therapy. A notable 88.2% (15/17) were still in remission 1 year after starting ADA. The ADA + AZA group (n = 16) exhibited a significantly higher relapse-free rate than the AZA group (n = 26) (p < 0.05; log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

switching to ADA for remission maintenance in patients with refractory UC who achieved clinical remission with TAC is clinically useful.

Prioritization in inflammatory bowel disease therapy

INTRODUCTION

Most guidelines for IBD still recommend step-by-step therapy with initially classic drugs such aminosalicylates (in ulcerative colitis) or steroids but avoid prioritizing certain biological drugs and JAK inhibitors in the complicated course. This review provides an aid to pending therapy decisions.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we analyze the evidence for Crohn's disease as well as ulcerative colitis in order to optimize and 'personalize' the choice of therapy, especially in difficult cases. The relevant publications in Pubmed were identified in a continuous literature review with the key words 'Crohn´s disease' and 'ulcerative colitis.'

EXPERT OPINION

Based on this complex data set following standard therapies steroid-refractory Crohn´s disease should preferentially be treated with combined infliximab plus azathioprine or risankizumab, in second line after their failure with ustekinumab or 7adalimumab. In steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis infliximab plus azathioprine or upadacitinib should be preferred in first line, filgotinib, tofacitinib or ustekinumab in second line. A steroid-dependent course in both diseases requires azathioprine or vedolizumab, in second line infliximab or Janus kinase inhibitors. The conclusions drawn from these complex data may be helpful for individual decision making in daily clinical practice.

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Optimal Strategies for Drug Therapy

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency with considerable morbidity (30% to 40%). Patients with ASUC require hospitalization for prompt medical treatment, and colectomy is considered if medical therapy fails. Corticosteroids remain the primary initial therapy, although one-third of patients do not respond to treatment. Clinical data have indicated that cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and infliximab can be used to treat patients with ASUC who do not respond to intravenous corticosteroids. The effectiveness and safety of sequential therapy have recently been reported; however, the data are not convincing. Importantly, timely decision-making with rescue therapy or surgical treatment is critical to manage ASUC without compromising the health or safety of the patients. In addition, risk stratification and the use of predictive clinical parameters have improved the clinical outcome.of ASUC. Multidisciplinary teams that include inflammatory bowel disease experts, colorectal surgeons, and other medical staff contribute to the better management of patients with ASUC. In this review, we introduce current evidence and present a clinical approach to manage ASUC.

Thiopurine naivety at tacrolimus induction is a predictor of long-term remission in patients with intractable ulcerative colitis who responded to tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

The short-term efficacy of tacrolimus (Tac) for steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) has been demonstrated; however, its long-term outcomes have not been well documented. Thus, this study aimed to clarify the long-term outcomes of patients who achieved Tac-induced remission and identify its predictors.

METHODS

This study included patients with moderate-to-severe active UC who started receiving Tac at our hospital between July 2004 and December 2016. Short-term treatment response was assessed using the Lichtiger index 3 months after starting Tac, and responding patients were further followed up to assess long-term outcomes. The primary endpoint was the relapse-free survival after Tac-induced remission, and the secondary endpoint was the identification of factors associated with relapse after Tac-induced remission.

RESULTS

The cumulative relapse-free survival rate at 10 years after Tac-induced remission was 33.2%. Multivariate analysis revealed that being thiopurine naïve at Tac induction was associated with the absence of relapse (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.22-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of patients who achieved Tac-induced remission maintained long-term remission. Being thiopurine naïve at Tac induction was a predictor of the absence of relapse.

Tacrolimus (FK506) for induction of remission in corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

There are a limited number of treatment options for people with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Animal models of inflammatory bowel disease and uncontrolled studies in humans suggest that tacrolimus may be an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for induction of remission in people with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gut group specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTRP from inception to October 2021 to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCT).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently selected potentially relevant studies to determine eligibility based on the prespecified criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and analysed them using Review Manager Web. The primary outcomes were induction of remission and clinical improvement, as defined by the studies and expressed as a percentage of the participants randomised (intention-to-treat analysis).

MAIN RESULTS

This review included five RCTs with 347 participants who had active ulcerative colitis or ulcerative proctitis. The duration of intervention varied between two weeks and eight weeks. Tacrolimus versus placebo Tacrolimus (oral and rectal) may be superior in achieving clinical remission compared to placebo (oral and rectal) (14/87 participants with tacrolimus versus 1/61 participants with placebo; risk ratio (RR) 3.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 13.73; 3 studies). These results are of low certainty due to imprecision and risk of bias. Tacrolimus (oral and rectal) may be superior for clinical improvement compared to placebo (oral and rectal) (45/87 participants with tacrolimus versus 7/61 participants with placebo; RR 4.47, 95% CI 2.15 to 9.29; 3 studies). These results are of low certainty due to imprecision and risk of bias. The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of tacrolimus (oral and rectal) on serious adverse events compared to placebo (oral and rectal) (2/87 participants with tacrolimus versus 0/61 participants with placebo; RR 2.44, 95% CI 0.12 to 48.77; 3 studies). These results are of very low certainty due to high imprecision and risk of bias. Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin One study compared oral tacrolimus to intravenous ciclosporin, with an intervention lasting two weeks and 113 randomised participants. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tacrolimus on achievement of clinical remission compared to ciclosporin (15/33 participants with tacrolimus versus 24/80 participants with ciclosporin; RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.50). The results are of very low certainty due to risk of bias and high imprecision. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tacrolimus on clinical improvement compared to intravenous ciclosporin (23/33 participants with tacrolimus versus 62/80 participants with ciclosporin; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16). The results are of very low certainty due to risk of bias and imprecision. Tacrolimus versus beclometasone One study compared tacrolimus suppositories with beclometasone suppositories in an intervention lasting four weeks with 88 randomised participants. There may be little to no difference in achievement of clinical remission (16/44 participants with tacrolimus versus 15/44 participants with beclometasone; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.88). The results are of low certainty due to high imprecision. There may be little to no difference in clinical improvement when comparing tacrolimus suppositories to beclometasone suppositories (22/44 participants with tacrolimus versus 22/44 with beclometasone; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.52). The results are of low certainty due to high imprecision. There may be little to no difference in serious adverse events when comparing tacrolimus suppositories to beclometasone suppositories (1/44 participants with tacrolimus versus 0/44 with beclometasone; RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 71.70). These results are of low certainty due to high imprecision. There may be little to no difference in total adverse events when comparing tacrolimus suppositories to beclometasone suppositories (21/44 participants with tacrolimus versus 14/44 participants with beclometasone; RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.55). These results are of low certainty due to high imprecision. No secondary outcomes were reported for people requiring rescue medication or to undergo surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-certainty evidence that tacrolimus may be superior to placebo for achievement of clinical remission and clinical improvement in corticosteroid-refractory colitis or corticosteroid-refractory proctitis. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tacrolimus compared to ciclosporin for achievement of clinical remission or clinical improvement. There may be no difference between tacrolimus and beclometasone for inducing clinical remission or clinical improvement. The cohorts studied to date were small, with missing data sets, offered short follow-up and the clinical endpoints used were not in line with those suggested by regulatory bodies. Therefore, no clinical practice conclusions can be made. This review highlights the need for further research that targets the relevant clinical questions, uses appropriate trial methodology and reports key findings in a systematic manner that facilitates future integration of findings with current evidence to better inform clinicians and patients. Future studies need to be adequately powered and of pertinent duration so as to capture the efficacy and effectiveness of tacrolimus in the medium to long term. Well-structured efficacy studies need to be followed up by long-term phase 4 extensions to provide key outputs and inform in a real-world setting.

Tacrolimus as rescue therapy for steroid-dependent/steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: Experience from tertiary referral center in India

INTRODUCTION

Between 20% and 40% of patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC) are either steroid-refractory UC (SRUC) or steroid-dependent UC (SDUC). Tacrolimus is an oral and relatively inexpensive drug, which has been extensively used in Japan for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent disease.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SDUC/SRUC were treated with tacrolimus 0.05-0.1 mg/kg in this prospective study. Clinical Mayo score (CMS) and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) were evaluated prior to starting the drug and subsequently after 8 weeks. 5-Aminosalicylic acid agents (5-ASA) and immunomodulators were continued if the patients were previously on these drugs. Clinical response at 8 weeks was defined as decrease in CMS by at least 3 points. Clinical remission was defined as CMS ≤2 and combined remission as CMS≤2 with UCEIS <3.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (29 males) with a mean age of 35.1± 12.8 years with predominantly E3 disease (71%) were prospectively evaluated in this study. SDUC and SRUC were diagnosed in 31 and 21 patients, respectively. Seven failed treatment within 8 weeks, four were subjected to surgery, and 3 were switched to infliximab. Forty-two patients continued tacrolimus for 8 weeks. Mean CMS and UCEIS prior to starting tacrolimus were 6 ± 1.1 and 4.8 ± 1.1, respectively. At 8 weeks, median CMS and UCEIS decreased to 2.6 ± 1.7 and 2.7 ± 1.3, respectively. Clinical response was documented in 29 patients (56%) at week 8 whereas clinical remission was seen in 25 patients (48%). Combined clinical and endoscopic remissions were seen in 18 patients (35%). Except for a single  patient who developed reversible renal dysfunction, no other adverse event was  observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that tacrolimus is effective in inducing a clinical response in 56% of patients with SDUC and SRUC. In view of its low cost and safety profile, it may be considered first-line therapy for SDUC/SRUC.

Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a critical review of national and international guideline recommendations

Es gibt zahlreiche nationale und internationale Leitlinien zu chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen, die auf vergleichbarer Evidenz sowie ähnlichen Prozeduren beruhen und daher homogen sein sollten. In dieser kritischen Übersicht wurden die Leitlinienempfehlungen aus Europa (ECCO), Deutschland, Großbritannien, Kanada, den USA und Japan zur Therapie der steroidrefraktären Colitis ulcerosa verglichen. Die meisten Leitlinien unterschieden zwischen moderater/schwerer (ambulanter) und schwerer/fulminanter Colitis in der Klinik. Die Empfehlungen zur ersten Kategorie weisen gravierende Unterschiede auf, während zur Behandlung des stationären Patienten weitgehende Übereinstimmung herrscht. Verschiedene Erklärungen für die Inkonsistenzen werden diskutiert.

Early serum albumin changes in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with tacrolimus will predict clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Oral tacrolimus is a therapeutic agent for moderate to severe steroid-dependent or resistant ulcerative colitis (UC), but remission induction is difficult, and it is necessary to treat the patient while considering the next treatment.

AIM

To examine serum albumin (Alb) level as a prognostic factor for the therapeutic effect of tacrolimus in clinical practice.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with UC treated with tacrolimus at our institution were divided into remission and failure groups (colectomy or switch to biologics), and the biological data at the start of observation and at weeks 1 and 2 were retrospectively examined. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were performed using Alb as a prognostic factor in UC treatment.

RESULTS

During the three months observed, 17 (36.2%) patients failed treatment with tacrolimus. A comparison between the failure and remission groups showed a significant difference only in Alb in week 2, and in the week 2/week 0 Alb ratio, which showed the rate of change in Alb. The cut-off value of the week 2/week 0 Alb ratio that predicted failure was 1, and its area under the curve was 0.751 (95%CI: 0.604-0.898). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, a week 2/week 0 Alb ratio ≤ 1 had a significantly higher failure rate than that of > 1; Cox proportional hazard regression analysis also showed that a week 2/week 0 Alb ratio ≤ 1 was an independent prognostic factor for failure within 3 mo after the start of tacrolimus treatment.

CONCLUSION

A week 2/week 0 Alb ratio ≤ 1 predicts failure within 3 mo of tacrolimus administration for UC. High failure risk exists with week 2 Alb values ≤ 1 on admission.

Role of topical tacrolimus in the management of proctitis, perianal manifestations in Crohn's disease, and chronic pouchitis: a systematic review

Several published studies have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of oral and intravenous tacrolimus for the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, little is known about the effectiveness of topical tacrolimus in this patient population. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current state of literature to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rectal administration of topical tacrolimus, in the form of suppository, ointment, and/or enema in patients with ulcerative proctitis, perianal Crohn's disease (CD), and chronic refractory pouchitis. Electronic database searches were conducted in international databases since their inception until February 2020. Study subjects were categorized into three groups: topical tacrolimus for patients with proctitis, perianal CD, and chronic refractory pouchitis. The primary end point of this study was the remission rate. Secondary end points were response rate and the incidence of AEs. Eleven studies were included in the final assessment in this systematic review. This provided information from 188 patients. Tacrolimus was administered topically as suppositories, ointment, or enema. Clinical remission was achieved in 57.1%, 57.14%, and 70.0% in patients with proctitis, fistulizing perianal CD, and chronic pouchitis. The most commonly reported side effect was perianal itching and burning. Reversible nephrotoxicity occurred in a single patient. No clear correlation was found between blood levels and clinical outcomes. Topical tacrolimus is effective for a subset of patients with IBD. The adverse effects were minimal and tolerable. Well-designed randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the appropriate dose and administration method.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease - Non-biological treatment

Nowadays, non-biological treatments remain valuable approaches among the therapeutic armamentarium of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Mesalamine is the core treatment of mild‑to‑moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) and corticosteroids are crucial for the induction of remission of moderate‑to‑severe flares in both UC and Crohn's disease (CD). Even approaches as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, methotrexate, and surgery still have a nuclear position as strategies to induce and/or maintain remission in IBD. Due to their particularities and to the accumulated evidence, each of these strategies conquered peculiar roles in the overall IBD strategy, all of them contributing to better outcomes. This review emphasizes the particular roles that non-biological treatments gained over time: recent mesalamine formulations to increase adhesion rates, higher doses of 5-ASA for high-risk patients, MMX technology to improve drug release and attain higher bowel concentrations, cyclosporine as a bridge to vedolizumab, tacrolimus as a potential alternative to thiopurines or infliximab, azathioprine in combination therapy with infliximab and dubious in monotherapy, and surgery as a mean to a "better end".

Tacrolimus induces short-term but not long-term clinical response in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor commonly used for prophylaxis of rejection in renal and liver transplantation. There are limited but favourable data regarding its possible use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with IBD in clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicentre study in 22 centres in Spain. All adult patients who received oral tacrolimus for luminal or perianal IBD were included. Clinical response was assessed by Harvey-Bradshaw index and partial Mayo score after 3 months. Perianal disease was evaluated by fistula drainage assessment.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three patients were included (mean age 38 years; 51% male; median disease duration 110 months). In ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 58), the partial Mayo score decreased after 3 months from median 6 to 3 (P = 0.0001), whereas in Crohn's disease (CD) (n = 85), the Harvey-Bradshaw index decreased after 3 months from median 9 to 7 (P = 0.011). In CD patients, blood tacrolimus concentrations during induction (>10 ng/mL vs <10 ng/mL; odds ratio 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-0.87) and the concomitant use of thiopurines (odds ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.81) were associated with lower clinical disease activity at 3 months. Of 62 patients with perianal disease, complete closure was observed in 8% (n = 5) of patients with perianal fistulas, with 34% (n = 21) showing partial response. Treatment was maintained for a median of 6 months (IQR, 2-16). After a median clinical follow-up of 24 months (IQR, 15-57), the rate of treatment-related adverse events was 34%, correlating with blood drug concentrations (P = 0.021). Finally, 120 patients (84%) discontinued tacrolimus, usually due to absence or loss of response. Three patients (2%) were subsequently diagnosed with cancer. The overall rate of surgery was 39%, with a 33% colectomy rate in UC.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus shows a clinical benefit in both CD and UC after 3 months of treatment, but its long-term effectiveness and frequent adverse events remain relevant issues in clinical practice.

Tacrolimus Therapy in Steroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Review

Inflammatory bowel diseases are known for a chronic inflammatory process of the gastrointestinal tract and include Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients who are dependent on or resistant to corticosteroids account for about 20% of severe UC patients. Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that has recently been used in the treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Tacrolimus has been demonstrated to have remarkable therapeutic efficacy in UC patients, without increased risk of severe adverse effects such as induction of remission and maintenance therapy. This article reviews the mechanism of action, pharmacogenetics, efficacy, and safety of tacrolimus for patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Simple water-based tacrolimus enemas for refractory proctitis

Background and Aims

Rectal ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) often do not respond to conventional therapies. Oral and suppository tacrolimus are effective but often poorly tolerated or are complex to formulate. Tacrolimus is topically active, water soluble, and has minimal systemic toxicity when administered rectally; we therefore tested a simple tap water‐based enema formulation.

Methods

Tacrolimus powder from 1 mg capsules and tap water in a 60 mL syringe were delivered rectally. The primary end‐point was endoscopic response (UC: MAYO score reduction by one point; CD: improvement in ulcer number and severity). Secondary end‐points included endoscopic remission, clinical response, stool frequency, and rectal bleeding.

Results

Seventeen patients [12 UC, five CD, nine female, median age 31 years] with refractory rectal disease were treated. The majority of patients had failed immunosuppressive therapy [88% thiopurine; 71% biologic therapy]. Initial enemas included 1–4 mg tacrolimus daily and 1–3 mg tacrolimus maintenance three times a week for a median of 20 weeks (range 3–204). Concomitant thiopurine or biologic therapy continued. 94% tolerated therapy. Of 12 UC patients, eight (67%) achieved endoscopic remission, one further patient achieved endoscopic response, and median partial MAYO scores decreased (pre:4 vs. post:2; P = 0.010). Of five CD patients, three (60%) achieved endoscopic response, two (40%) endoscopic remission, and three (60%) clinical response. Stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and C‐reactive protein levels improved. Strictures became endoscopically passable in all four affected patients. No major adverse events were reported, and four patients had disease flare.

Conclusions

Tacrolimus enemas are easy to prepare, well tolerated, effective, and safe. They should be included in the treatment armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease‐related refractory proctitis.

Therapeutic Efficacy and Adverse Events of Tacrolimus in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Only a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and some uncontrolled trials have reported the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of tacrolimus (Tac) in patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic efficacy and AEs of Tac in patients with CD.

METHODS

We investigated studies reporting the therapeutic efficacy of Tac in patients with CD from 1950 until December 2017. Study subjects were categorized into three groups: systemic administration of Tac for patients with luminal CD (Group 1); systemic administration of Tac for patients with perianal CD (Group 2); and topical administration of Tac for patients with localized CD (Group 3). The primary endpoint of this study was the remission rate. Secondary endpoints were partial response rate, factors related to remission, and the incidence of AEs.

RESULTS

The remission rate of Group 1, 2, and 3 was 37.1, 32.0, and 22.7%, respectively. The partial response rate of those was 42.3, 42.9, and 44.3%, respectively. In addition, the incidence of AEs of those was 50.9, 65.5, and 40.0%, respectively. No life-threatening AEs were observed in any study.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that Tac therapy was effective for subpopulation of CD patients and that the incidence of AEs was tolerable. Therefore, Tac therapy should be considered an option for patients with CD. However, there have been few well-designed RCTs on this subject and further studies are required.

Appropriate Timing of Discontinuation of Tacrolimus Therapy for Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tacrolimus is very effective at inducing remission in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis. However, the optimal time-point for the discontinuation of tacrolimus is controversial because administration of tacrolimus for > 3 months is currently not approved for insurance reimbursement in Japan. We conducted this study to determine the optimal time of discontinuation of tacrolimus in patients with ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Of 38 patients who received tacrolimus as remission induction therapy for refractory active ulcerative colitis between 2009 and 2018, this study included 21 patients who received tacrolimus for ≥ 3 months before being switched to thiopurines. These patients were divided into two groups for analysis: the confirmed switch (CS) group (n = 13), in which tacrolimus was switched to azathioprine after endoscopic confirmation of mucosal improvement, and the mandatory switch (MS) group (n = 8), in which tacrolimus was switched to a thiopurine agent without endoscopic confirmation of improvement.

RESULTS

The relapse rates after the switch to azathioprine were 23% and 88% in the CS and MS groups, respectively (p = 0.0075). No patient of the CS group underwent surgery, while 50% of patients of the MS group underwent surgery (p = 0.0117). The cumulative event-free rates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 92%, 92%, and 65%, respectively, in the CS group and 15%, 15%, and 0%, respectively, in the MS group (p < 0.0001). The incidence rate of adverse reactions was 31% in the CS group and 13% in the MS group, but there were no serious adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems preferable to discontinue tacrolimus after endoscopic confirmation of mucosal healing. However, attention should be paid to the potential occurrence of adverse reactions associated with long-term tacrolimus therapy.

A comprehensive review and update on ulcerative colitis. Dis Mon 2019;65:100851. [PMID: 30837080 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2019.02.004]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorder of the colon that causes continuous mucosal inflammation extending from the rectum to the more proximal colon, with variable extents. UC is characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. UC was first described by Samuel Wilks in 1859 and it is more common than Crohn's disease worldwide. The overall incidence and prevalence of UC is reported to be 1.2-20.3 and 7.6-245 cases per 100,000 persons/year respectively. UC has a bimodal age distribution with an incidence peak in the 2nd or 3rd decades and followed by second peak between 50 and 80 years of age. The key risk factors for UC include genetics, environmental factors, autoimmunity and gut microbiota. The classic presentation of UC include bloody diarrhea with or without mucus, rectal urgency, tenesmus, and variable degrees of abdominal pain that is often relieved by defecation. UC is diagnosed based on the combination of clinical presentation, endoscopic findings, histology, and the absence of alternative diagnoses. In addition to confirming the diagnosis of UC, it is also important to define the extent and severity of inflammation, which aids in the selection of appropriate treatment and for predicting the patient's prognosis. Ileocolonoscopy with biopsy is the only way to make a definitive diagnosis of UC. A pathognomonic finding of UC is the presence of continuous colonic inflammation characterized by erythema, loss of normal vascular pattern, granularity, erosions, friability, bleeding, and ulcerations, with distinct demarcation between inflamed and non-inflamed bowel. Histopathology is the definitive tool in diagnosing UC, assessing the disease severity and identifying intraepithelial neoplasia (dysplasia) or cancer. The classical histological changes in UC include decreased crypt density, crypt architectural distortion, irregular mucosal surface and heavy diffuse transmucosal inflammation, in the absence of genuine granulomas. Abdominal computed tomographic (CT) scanning is the preferred initial radiographic imaging study in UC patients with acute abdominal symptoms. The hallmark CT finding of UC is mural thickening with a mean wall thickness of 8 mm, as opposed to a 2-3 mm mean wall thickness of the normal colon. The Mayo scoring system is a commonly used index to assess disease severity and monitor patients during therapy. The goals of treatment in UC are three fold-improve quality of life, achieve steroid free remission and minimize the risk of cancer. The choice of treatment depends on disease extent, severity and the course of the disease. For proctitis, topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) drugs are used as the first line agents. UC patients with more extensive or severe disease should be treated with a combination of oral and topical 5-ASA drugs +/- corticosteroids to induce remission. Patients with severe UC need to be hospitalized for treatment. The options in these patients include intravenous steroids and if refractory, calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus) or tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies (infliximab) are utilized. Once remission is induced, patients are then continued on appropriate medications to maintain remission. Indications for emergency surgery include refractory toxic megacolon, colonic perforation, or severe colorectal bleeding.

Tacrolimus Suppositories in Therapy-Resistant Ulcerative Proctitis

Background

Ulcerative proctitis may often be managed with topical salicylates or steroids alone, but in some patients, symptoms are persistent and severe. We analyzed the efficacy of tacrolimus suppositories in patients who had proven refractory to combined topical and systemic treatment.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, ulcerative colitis activity index (CAI), side effects, co-medication and drug levels were assessed in 43 patients with distal ulcerative colitis who received suppositories containing 2 mg of tacrolimus b.i.d. as add-on medication.

Results

A total of 23 patients with ulcerative proctitis presented to follow-up within ≤50 days (mean 27.0 days) after suppositories were started. A decrease in CAI (from 8.0 to 5.5 points) was observed and 52.3% reached clinical remission (CAI ≤4). In total, 43 patients were available for analysis, of whom 9 had inflammation of the sigmoid colon as well. For the entire cohort, the median treatment duration was 76 days; 60% were in remission on the last documented visit. Serum measurements revealed a substantial tacrolimus level with a mean of 5.5 ng/mL. We observed one case of mild reversible acute kidney injury.

Conclusions

In ulcerative proctitis, adding tacrolimus suppositories can be an effective and safe option when topical mesalazine, corticoid formulations and concomitant oral or parenteral medications have failed.

The treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative proctitis is defined as a mucosal inflammation limited to the rectum. Ulcerative proctitis is responsible for distressing symptoms and alteration of patient quality of life. Effective treatment is important to prevent or delay proximal extension of the disease and to improve quality of life. Refractory ulcerative proctitis is defined as the failure of topical and oral 5-aminosalicylic acid and corticosteroids. Medical management of refractory ulcerative proctitis may be challenging as there is little evidence regarding drug efficacy in this clinical situation. Data are currently available for azathioprine, topical tacrolimus and anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies as rescue treatment for refractory ulcerative proctitis. Other biologics may be of benefit despite a lack of dedicated clinical trials. Ultimately, experimental therapies such as epidermal growth factor enemas, appendectomy or fecal transplantation may be tried before restorative proctocolectomy with J pouch anastomosis, which has demonstrated good results with regards to clinical remission and quality of life.

Tacrolimus therapy in moderate to subacute ulcerative proctocolitis: a large single-centre cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the 'real world' effectiveness of tacrolimus therapy for refractory ulcerative proctocolitis (UC).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using prospectively collated clinical data.

SETTING

A single district general hospital in Kent, UK. Clinical decisions and regular monitoring were undertaken by a single expert in inflammatory bowel disease.

PATIENTS

All patients started on tacrolimus between January 2010 and August 2016 at Tunbridge Wells Hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

Following failure of conventional medication, tacrolimus was commenced at 0.5 mg/kg twice daily. Drug trough levels of 5-20 ng/mL were targeted. Other immunomodulation was stopped and steroids were weaned over 4-6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment duration was measured for each patient. If the drug was stopped, the rationale, including specific side effects, was recorded. The patient's subsequent management plan was noted.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were started on tacrolimus (range: 18-85, median: 36 years). Disease extent included proctitis to pancolitis. Twenty-five patients derived no benefit. Four patients responded, but drug side effects necessitated withdrawal. Eighteen of these 29 patients (62%) underwent surgery. One patient, who had previously responded, stopped the drug after becoming pregnant (healthy subsequent birth). Therefore, 5 of 35 patients (14%) remain on tacrolimus with sustained clinical response, ranging from 6 to 76 (median: 32) months of treatment. Treatment was most effective for proctosigmoiditis. There were no other demographic or biological markers for success.

CONCLUSIONS

In line with UK and European guidelines, tacrolimus can be beneficial for refractory UC. With appropriate monitoring, it appears treatment can be continued safely long term.

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Tacrolimus versus Infliximab for Active Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

This narrative review was to determine which medication, tacrolimus (TAC) or infliximab (IFX), is safer and more effective in the management of active UC. Our literature search identified 5 studies directly comparing the outcomes of TAC versus IFX for active UC. A review of the 5 studies was undertaken.

SUMMARY

The incidence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between the TAC and IFX groups. The short-term clinical remission and response rates and the colectomy-free rates were similar between the groups. TAC was usually withdrawn at week 12 and, therefore, the long-term efficacy of TAC could not be properly evaluated. The majority of patients in the IFX group maintained clinical remission in the long-term. The efficacy of IFX as second-line salvage therapy after failure of TAC appeared to be favourable, but the efficacy of TAC after failure of IFX was questionable. Key Messages: Both TAC and IFX appeared to be equally safe and effective in the short-term for patients with active UC. For the moment, treatment choice, TAC or IFX, should be guided by physician and centre experience. Randomised controlled trials are urgently warranted to rigorously compare the efficacy of TAC versus IFX for active UC.

ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 1236C/T polymorphism significantly affects the therapeutic outcome of tacrolimus in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Tacrolimus is now considered to be one of the main therapeutic options for refractory ulcerative colitis. Both cytochrome P-450 3A5 (CYP3A5) and ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) associated with tacrolimus metabolism are known to have several genetic polymorphisms. However, it remains controversial whether these polymorphisms affect the therapeutic efficacy for ulcerative colitis. We aimed to investigate the influence of both CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms on the efficacy of tacrolimus in ulcerative colitis treatment under the tight dose-adjusting strategy.

METHODS

Sixty-one Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis treated with tacrolimus were enrolled retrospectively. Tacrolimus treatment was performed using the tight dose-adjusting strategy. Genotyping for CYP3A5*3, ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>A,T, and 3435C>T were performed, and the clinical outcomes at 12 weeks after the initiation of tacrolimus were compared among the genotypes.

RESULTS

There was no association between the CYP3A5 genotypes and therapeutic efficacy. In contrast, a significant association was observed with the ABCB1 1236C > T polymorphism and therapeutic efficacy. The ABCB1 1236CC+CT groups (n = 41) had a significantly higher response rate (73% vs 35%; P = 0.004) and remission rate (61% vs 20%; P = 0.002) than the TT group (n = 20). The multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed that ABCB1 1236C>T was identified as an independent factor associated with remission.

CONCLUSIONS

ABCB1 1236C>T polymorphism significantly affects the therapeutic efficacy of tarcolimus at 12 weeks under the tight dose-adjusting treatment for ulcerative colitis.

Rapid Induction Therapy with Oral Tacrolimus in Elderly Patients with Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Can Easily Lead to Elevated Tacrolimus Concentrations in Blood: A Report of 5 Cases

Case series

Patient: —

Final Diagnosis: Ulcerative colitis

Symptoms: Diarrhea • hematochezia

Medication: Tacrolimus

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology

EFFICACY OF TACROLIMUS FOR INDUCTION OF REMISSION IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that shows that calcineurin inhibitors may be useful for the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of tacrolimus for remission induction in this setting is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a systematic review on the existing evidence regarding the clinical efficacy of tacrolimus for the induction of remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken from 1966 to August 2016 using MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and the Cochrane Library. The following MeSH terms were used: "Inflammatory Bowel Diseases" or "Ulcerative Colitis" and "Calcineurin Inhibitors" or "Tacrolimus" or "FK506". Studies performed in adult ulcerative colitis patients that evaluated the clinical efficacy of tacrolimus for the induction of remission were considered for revision. A meta-analysis was performed with those included studies that were also placebo-controlled and randomized. Clinical response as well as clinical remission and mucosal healing were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 755 references were identified, from which 22 studies were finally included. Only two of them were randomized, placebo-controlled trials. A total of 172 patients were evaluated. A significantly lower risk of failure in clinical response was found for tacrolimus versus placebo [RR 0.58 (0.45-0.73)]; moreover, a lower risk of failure in the induction of remission was also found versus placebo [RR 0.91 (0.82-1)].

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus seems to be a valid therapeutic alternative for the induction of remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases are common in Europe, with prevalences as high as 1 in 198 persons (ulcerative colitis) and 1 in 310 persons (Crohn's disease).

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent articles retrieved by a search in PubMed and in German and European guidelines and Cochrane reviews of controlled trials.

RESULTS

Typically, the main clinical features of inflammatory bowel diseases are diarrhea, abdominal pain, and, in the case of ulcerative colitis, peranal bleeding. These diseases are due to a complex immunological disturbance with both genetic and environmental causes. A defective mucosal barrier against commensal bowel flora plays a major role in their pathogenesis. The diagnosis is based on laboratory testing, ultrasonography, imaging studies, and, above all, gastrointestinal endoscopy. Most patients with Crohn's disease respond to budesonide or systemic steroids; aminosalicylates are less effective. Refractory exacerbations may be treated with antibodies against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or, more recently, antibodies against integrin, a protein of the cell membrane. In ulcerative colitis, aminosalicylates are given first; if necessary, steroids or antibodies against TNF-α or integrin are added. Maintenance therapy to prevent further relapses often involves immunosuppression with thiopurines and/or antibodies. Once all conservative treatment options have been exhausted, surgery may be necessary.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases requires individually designed therapeutic strategies and the close interdisciplinary collaboration of internists and surgeons.

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between tacrolimus and infliximab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a single center experience

OBJECTIVE

Both tacrolimus (Tac) and infliximab (IFX) are effective for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of both drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 46 patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were treated either by Tac (n = 21) or IFX (n = 25). We compared the remission and response rates for 10 weeks between the two groups. In patients who achieved a clinical response, the subsequent relapse rate was compared. The overall adverse events were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The remission and response rates at week 10 did not differ between patients treated with Tac (67% and 86%, respectively) and patients treated with IFX (76% and 92%, respectively). Among 41 patients showing a clinical response, eight of 23 patients treated with IFX and eight of 18 patients treated with Tac showed a subsequent relapse. The risk of relapse was not different between the two groups. While no serious adverse events were observed, the incidence of adverse events was higher in patients treated with Tac than in those treated with IFX.

CONCLUSION

Tac and IFX may be equally efficacious for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with UC while minor adverse events are more frequent with the former treatment.

Review article: acute severe ulcerative colitis - evidence-based consensus statements

BACKGROUND

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis.

AIM

To develop consensus statements based on a systematic review of the literature of the management of ASUC to improve patient outcome.

METHODS

Following a literature review, the Delphi method was used to develop the consensus statements. A steering committee, based in Australia, generated the statements of interest. Three rounds of anonymous voting were carried out to achieve the final results. Acceptance of statements was pre-determined by ≥80% votes in 'complete agreement' or 'agreement with minor reservation'.

RESULTS

Key recommendations include that patients with ASUC should be: hospitalised, undergo unprepared flexible sigmoidoscopy to assess severity and to exclude cytomegalovirus colitis, and be provided with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and intravenous hydrocortisone 100 mg three or four times daily with close monitoring by a multidisciplinary team. Rescue therapy such as infliximab or ciclosporin should be started if insufficient response by day 3, and colectomy considered if no response to 7 days of rescue therapy or earlier if deterioration. With such an approach, it is expected that colectomy rate during admission will be below 30% and mortality less than 1% in specialist centres.

CONCLUSION

These evidenced-based consensus statements on acute severe ulcerative colitis, developed by a multidisciplinary group, provide up-to-date best practice recommendations that improve and harmonise management as well as provide auditable quality assessments.

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Therapy for Active Ulcerative Colitis; A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] experience a severe flare requiring steroid therapy to avoid colectomy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of tacrolimus as a rescue therapy for active UC.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies assessing the efficacy of tacrolimus for active UC. Outcomes included short- and long-term clinical response, colectomy free rates, and rate of adverse events in randomised controlled trials [RCTs] and observational studies.

RESULTS

Two RCTs comparing high trough concentration [10-15ng/ml] versus placebo [n = 103] and 23 observational studies [n = 831] were identified. Clinical response at 2 weeks was significantly higher with tacrolimus compared with placebo (risk ratio [RR] = 4.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.09-10.17, p = 0.15 x 10(-3)] among RCTs. Rates of clinical response at 1 and 3 months were 0.73 [95% CI = 0.64-0.81] and 0.76 [95% CI = 0.59-0.87], and colectomy-free rates remained high at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months [0.86, 0.84, 0.78, and 0.69, respectively] among observational studies. Among RCTs, adverse events were more frequent compared with placebo [RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.20-3.37, p = 0.83 x 10(-2)], but there was no difference in severe adverse events [RR = 3.15, 95% CI = 0.14-72.9, p = 0.47]. Severe adverse events were rare among observational studies [0.11, 95% CI = 0.06-0.20].

CONCLUSIONS

In the present meta-analysis, tacrolimus was associated with high clinical response and colectomy-free rates without increased risk of severe adverse events for active UC.

The Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity More Accurately Reflects Clinical Outcomes and Long-term Prognosis than the Mayo Endoscopic Score

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) and the Mayo endoscopic score (Mayo ES) are used to evaluate ulcerative colitis (UC) severity. This study compared UCEIS and the Mayo ES for evaluating UC severity and outcomes in patients undergoing remission induction during routine clinical practice with the aim of predicting medium- to long-term prognosis.

METHODS

Forty-one UC patients who received colonoscopy before and after tacrolimus remission induction therapy were included. An index of clinical activity and endoscopic findings scored by both the UCEIS and the Mayo ES were determined. Changes in UCEIS and Mayo ES before and after induction therapy were compared.

RESULTS

The mean UCEIS improved from 6.2±0.9 to 3.4±2.1 (p < 0.001). Based on the UCEIS, a significant reduction was reached in both the response and the remission groups. In contrast, the Mayo ES did not reflect a significant change in the response group. The discrepancy appeared to be due to ulcers becoming smaller and shallower during the early stages of mucosal healing; the Mayo ES seems to miss these early changes. In other words, whereas the UCEIS indicates improvements when ulcers shrink, the Mayo ES does not distinguish deep ulcers from shallow ulcers and is 3 (severe UC) for both deep and shallow ulcers. Additionally, better UCEIS strata after induction therapy were associated with lower incidences of colectomy (p = 0.0001) or relapse (p = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

The UCEIS accurately reflects clinical outcomes and predicts the medium- to long-term prognosis in UC patients undergoing induction therapy. These findings should support decision-making in clinical practice settings.

A Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Therapeutic Outcomes of Infliximab- versus Tacrolimus-Based Strategies for Steroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Background/Aims. Antitumor necrosis factor antibodies and calcineurin inhibitors have shown good therapeutic efficacy for steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Although some studies have compared the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) and cyclosporin A, there are no published studies comparing IFX and tacrolimus (Tac). This study aimed to compare therapeutic efficacies between IFX- and Tac-based strategies for steroid-refractory UC. Methods. Between July 2009 and August 2013, 95 patients with steroid-refractory UC received either IFX (n = 48) or Tac (n = 47) in our hospital. In the IFX group, the patients continued to receive maintenance treatment with IFX. In the Tac group, patients discontinued Tac treatment up to 3 months and subsequently received thiopurine. We retrospectively compared the therapeutic outcomes between the groups. Results. There was no significant difference in the colectomy-free rate, clinical remission rate, and clinical response rate at 2 months between the groups. However, relapse-free survival was significantly higher in the IFX group than in the Tac group (p < 0.001; log-rank test). The proportions of serious adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion. The findings of our study showed that IFX and Tac have similar short-term therapeutic efficacy for steroid-refractory UC. Maintenance treatment with IFX, however, yields better long-term outcomes than Tac-thiopurine bridging treatment.

Long-term Outcomes in Steroid-refractory Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Tacrolimus Alone or in Combination with Purine Analogues

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Tacrolimus is recommended for the treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Concomitantly started purine analogues (PAs) are used for the maintenance of remission, though their therapeutic relevance remains uncertain. Here we studied the role of PAs in the long-term outcome of steroid-refractory UC after tacrolimus treatment.

METHODS

In five centres, charts of tacrolimus-treated UC patients with a steroid-refractory moderate to severe course were reviewed. Long-term efficacy was determined by colectomy rates and clinical remission in cases of colectomy-free survival for 3 months.

RESULTS

We identified 156 patients (median age 34 years) with a median Lichtiger score of 12 (4-17) and pancolitis (E3) in 65% (101). The Kaplan-Meier curve for colectomy-free survival after month 3 showed a benefit in the PA group (p = 0.02). In patients treated with PA clinical remission was achieved in 82% (65/79) vs 67% (39/58) in those not treated with PA (p = 0.02). Time to colectomy was 2 years (median, 0.7-5.8) in the PA group and 0.8 years (0.3-4.7) in the group not treated with PAs (p = 0.02). Time to relapse was 1.2 years (median, 0.3-6.2) in patients with PA treatment and 0.5 years (0.3-3.9) in those without PA treatment (p = 0.05). Overall, clinical remission was achieved in 67% (104/156) of patients. Colectomy was performed in 29% (45/156) 0.5 years (median, 0.04-5.79) after initiation of tacrolimus. Ten (6%) patients had to stop tacrolimus due to adverse events and two (without PA treatment) died.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the efficacy of tacrolimus in steroid-refractory UC. Purine analogues appear to be beneficial for the long-term outcome of these patients.

Medical Therapy of Active Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Medical therapy of mild and moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) of any extent is evidence-based and standardized by national and international guidelines. However, patients with steroid-refractory UC still represent a challenge.

Methods

A literature search using PubMed (search terms: ulcerative colitis, therapy, new, 1-2008-2015) resulted in 821 publications. For the current article, 88 citations were extracted including 36 randomized controlled studies, 18 reviews, and 8 meta-analyses.

Results

In steroid-refractory UC, early intensive therapy using anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies or the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus is indicated in any case to prevent progression to a toxic megacolon and/or to avoid proctocolectomy. In patients with chronic disease activity, treatment with anti-TNF antibodies has a higher level of evidence than azathioprine therapy and should therefore be preferred. However, there is a subgroup of UC patients who may achieve prolonged steroid-free remission on azathioprine monotherapy. The importance of vedolizumab, a newly registered inhibiting antibody against integrin, has not yet been fully clarified since direct comparison studies are lacking, in particular in relation to anti-TNF antibodies.

Conclusion

There is a great need for additional innovative therapies, especially in cases of primary non-response or secondary loss of response to anti-TNF antibodies. New small molecules (Janus kinase inhibitors) are promising with an acceptable safety profile and efficacy in UC. Further, strategies that target the intestinal microbiome are currently considered for patients with active or relapsing UC, and may in the future open up new therapeutic options.

Tacrolimus for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Two randomized controlled trials and a number of retrospective studies have assessed the therapeutic effect of tacrolimus in UC patients. These studies showed that tacrolimus has excellent short-term efficacy in corticosteroid-refractory patients, with the rates of clinical response ranging from 61% to 96%. However, the long-term prognosis of patients treated with tacrolimus is disappointing, and almost 50% of patients eventually underwent colectomy in long-term follow-up. Tacrolimus can achieve mucosal healing in 40-50% of patients, and this is associated with a favorable long-term prognosis. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antibodies are another therapeutic option in corticosteroid-refractory patients. A prospective head-to-head comparative study of tacrolimus and infliximab is currently being performed to determine which treatment is more effective in corticosteroid-refractory patients. Several retrospective studies have demonstrated that switching between tacrolimus and anti-TNF-α antibody therapy was effective in patients who were refractory to one of the treatments. Most adverse events of tacrolimus are mild; however, opportunistic infections, especially pneumocystis pneumonia, are the most important adverse events, and these should be carefully considered during treatment. Several issues on tacrolimus treatment in UC patients remain unsolved (e.g., use of tacrolimus as remission maintenance therapy). Further controlled studies are needed to optimize the use of tacrolimus for the treatment of UC.

Tacrolimus for remission induction in ulcerative colitis: Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 and 1 predict long-term prognosis

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus has shown efficacy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus as remission induction therapy and assess medium to long-term outcomes in patients who achieve remission.

METHODS

Forty-four ulcerative colitis patients who were treated with tacrolimus in three institutes during 2009-2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Short-term efficacy was based on the clinical activity index and the Mayo endoscopic subscores. Clinical activity index≤4 meant clinical remission, while Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 or 1 meant mucosal healing. Medium to long-term prognosis was based on relapse free survival in relation to the Mayo endoscopic subscore and duration of tacrolimus therapy in patients who achieved remission.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, clinical remission was achieved in 29 of 44 patients (65.9%). Thirty-two patients received endoscopic evaluations, and mucosal healing rate was 43.8%. Among patients with clinical remission, mucosal healing rate was 60.9%. Relapse-free survival at 6, 12, and 24 months were 66%, 56%, and 50%, respectively, and was higher in patients on long-term tacrolimus (over 4 months, P=0.03), and patients with better endoscopic subscore (P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Mucosal healing observed within 12 weeks or after a longer duration of tacrolimus therapy was associated with significantly better remission maintenance time.

Tacrolimus or infliximab for severe ulcerative colitis: short-term and long-term data from a retrospective observational study

Objective

Treatment of severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is challenging. Although the efficacy of tacrolimus (TAC) and infliximab (IFX) have been evaluated in patients with severe UC, the safety and efficacy levels of sequential therapies (TAC→IFX/IFX→TAC) in these patients remain unclear. The aim of this study was to assess short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with severe UC treated with TAC and IFX.

Methods

From October 2001 to February 2014, 29 patients with consecutive severe UC treated with TAC or IFX were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up duration was 27 months (range 0.5–118 months). The primary end point was short-term outcomes at 8 weeks after induction of TAC (TAC group, n=22) or IFX (IFX group, n=7). The secondary end point included long-term outcomes and colectomy-free survival. The clinical response was evaluated based on a partial Mayo score.

Results

The clinical remission (CR) rate at 8 weeks in the TAC and IFX groups was 63.6% and 71.4%, respectively. In 13 of the 29 patients (10 in the TAC group, 3 in the IFX group), sequential therapies were used in their clinical courses. In 9 of these 13 patients (6 in the TAC group, 3 in the IFX group), CR was achieved and maintained by sequential therapies. Overall cumulative colectomy-free survival was 79.3% at 118 months.

Conclusions

TAC and IFX had similar effects on remission induction in patients with severely active UC. Sequential therapies could rescue patients with UC who failed initial treatment with TAC or IFX. In clinical practice, sequential therapies might be deliberately performed.

Effects of oral tacrolimus as a rapid induction therapy in ulcerative colitis

AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of rapid induction therapy with oral tacrolimus without a meal in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.

METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Between May 2010 and August 2012, 49 steroid-refractory UC patients (55 flare-ups) were consecutively enrolled. All patients were treated with oral tacrolimus without a meal at an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg per day. The dose was adjusted to maintain trough whole-blood levels of 10-15 ng/mL for the first 2 wk. Induction of remission at 2 and 4 wk after tacrolimus treatment initiation was evaluated using Lichtiger’s clinical activity index (CAI).

RESULTS: The mean CAI was 12.6 ± 3.6 at onset. Within the first 7 d, 93.5% of patients maintained high trough levels (10-15 ng/mL). The CAI significantly decreased beginning 2 d after treatment initiation. At 2 wk, 73.1% of patients experienced clinical responses. After tacrolimus initiation, 31.4% and 75.6% of patients achieved clinical remission at 2 and 4 wk, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION: Rapid induction therapy with oral tacrolimus shortened the time to achievement of appropriate trough levels and demonstrated a high remission rate 28 d after treatment initiation. Rapid induction therapy with oral tacrolimus appears to be a useful therapy for the treatment of refractory UC.

Role in calcineurin inhibitors for inflammatory bowel disease in the biologics era: when and how to use

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, which is the 2 major forms of inflammatory bowel disease, are chronic relapsing and remitting inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. During the last 30 years, the therapy for patients with refractory inflammatory bowel diseases is still challenging despite the fact that morbidity and mortality rates have been obviously reduced. The conventional management with corticosteroids has been modified by the introduction of calcineurin inhibitors and biologics. In this review, we focus on role in calcineurin inhibitors for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the currently clinical practice.

Therapeutic peptides in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic peptides in inflammatory bowel diseases essentially comprise cytokines affecting immune response, growth factors and monoclonal antibodies directed against key targets of mucosal inflammation, in particular, tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a). The latter have revolutionized standard medical treatment which previously was restricted to mesalamine, corticosteroids or classical immunosuppressants.

AREAS COVERED

We review current evidence of the use of the so-called biologicals, including the well-established TNF-a antagonists and novel peptides and monoclonal antibodies developed for these diseases. The focus is on controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses, if available. Limitations and biases of these studies are important but tend to be ignored. Safety is also an important issue with opportunistic infections and lymphoma as relevant risks. There is significant heterogeneity between different countries, guidelines and opinions within the scientific community regarding clinical indications, even apart from pharmacoeconomics and reimbursement.

EXPERT OPINION

TNF blockers have greatly extended medical options in inflammatory bowel diseases. Their more or less extensive use in nearly all patients or only a few selected indications is a matter of debate. It proved difficult to reproduce this success with other antibody targets as well as with immunomodulatory cytokines and growth factors. The most promising novel peptide is vedolizumab, an antibody against α4β7 integrin.

Efficacy of salvage therapy and its effect on operative outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of salvage therapy, and to identify risk factors of operative complications among hospitalized ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 88 UC patients hospitalized at our center between April 2010 and November 2012. We compared characteristics of corticosteroid-refractory patients treated with calcineurin inhibitor and those with infliximab as second-line therapy. Furthermore, we compared the characteristics of operative and nonoperative patients. The association between perioperative treatments and complications was also investigated.

RESULTS

Calcineurin inhibitor and infliximab were used in 42 and 22 patients, respectively. We found no difference in the clinical background between them. Efficacy rates were 67 and 50%, respectively. Eight out of 10 nonresponders of each treatment were treated with the other drug as third-line therapy. The efficacy rates of calcineurin inhibitor and infliximab as the third-line therapy were 75 and 50%, respectively. Operative patients had more severe disease (87.5 vs. 31%, p < 0.01), higher Lichtiger score (14.1 vs. 11.5, p < 0.01), higher Rachmilewitz endoscopic index (10.5 vs. 8.4, p < 0.01), higher C-reactive protein (7.6 vs. 4.0, p = 0.015) and lower serum albumin (3.1 vs. 3.6, p = 0.014) than nonoperative patients. Complications were observed in 7 out of 16 (44 %) operative patients. Postoperative complications were not increased even when patients were treated with second- or third-line therapy. However, the complication rate in corticosteroid users was 54.5 (6/11) and 20% (1/5) in nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

Third-line salvage therapy is effective and tolerable in carefully selected UC patients. Perioperative use of corticosteroids may lead to more adverse outcomes.

Tacrolimus induction followed by maintenance monotherapy is useful in selected patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis refractory to prior treatment

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus in refractory ulcerative colitis often serves as a bridge to long-term maintenance therapy with thiopurines. Our aim was to review efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in active ulcerative colitis resistant to conventional therapies, including anti-tumour necrosis factor.

METHODS

Charts of consecutive outpatients with refractory ulcerative colitis, in whom tacrolimus was orally administered as a 12 week-induction (target trough levels 10-15ng/mL) followed by a maintenance therapy (target trough levels 5-10ng/mL), were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical remission and response at weeks 4, 12 and 52 as well as adverse events within 1-year therapy were reported.

RESULTS

Twelve (40%) and six (20%) of the 30 patients included (14 males, mean age 37.1±1.4 years) achieved a clinical remission and response, respectively, at week 12. Three responders to tacrolimus initiation experienced drug-related adverse events requiring discontinuation. Among the 18 remaining initial responders who tolerated tacrolimus, 8 (27%) were in clinical remission at week 52, whereas the remainder either experienced adverse events requiring drug withdrawal (n=4) or relapsed (n=6). Overall adverse events were recorded in 14 patients (46%), mainly finger tremor and urinary infections.

CONCLUSION

Oral monotherapy with tacrolimus may be a valuable long-term therapeutic option in selected patients with moderate-to-severe active refractory ulcerative colitis.

Optimization of the treatment with immunosuppressants and biologics in inflammatory bowel disease

Many placebo controlled trials and meta-analyses evaluated the efficacy of different drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including immunosuppressants and biologics. Their use is indicated in moderate to severe disease in non responders to corticosteroids and in steroid-dependent patients, as induction and maintainance treatment. Infliximab, as well as cyclosporine, is considered a second line therapy in the case of severe ulcerative colitis, or non-responders to intravenous corticosteroids. An adequate dosage and duration of therapy with thiopurines should be reached before evaluating their efficacy. Methotrexate is a valid option in patients with Crohn's disease but its use is confined to patients who are intolerant or non-responders to thiopurines. Evidence for the use of methotrexate in ulcerative colitis is insufficient. The use of thalidomide and mycophenolate mofetil is not recommended in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, these treatments could be considered in case of failure of all other therapeutic options. In patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis, refractory to thiopurines, the use of tacrolimus is considered an alternative to biologics. An increase of the dose or a decrease in the interval of administration of biological treatment could be useful in the presence of an incomplete clinical response. In the case of primary failure of an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha a switch to another one should be considered. Data on the efficacy of combination therapy are up to now insufficient to consider this strategy in all IBD patients. The final outcome of the treatment should be considered the clinical remission, with mucosa healing, and not the clinical response. The evaluation of serum concentration of thiopurine methyl transferase activity, thiopurine metabolites, biologic serum levels and antibiologic antibodies could be useful for the management of the treatment but it has not been routinely applied in clinical practice. The evidence of high risk development of lymphoma and cutaneous malignancies should be considered in patients treated with immunosuppressants and biologics for a long period.

[Treatment of severe ulcerative colitis flares]

The treatment of severe ulcerative colitis remains a challenge for gastroenterologists. A not inconsiderable number of patients will experience severe flares throughout their lives and will require hospitalization. Mortality in severe ulcerative colitis is still high and consequently treatment must be aggressive, avoiding delays in rescue therapies or even surgery. The aim of this review was to describe the medical treatment of severe ulcerative colitis, highlighting recent therapeutic advances.