Randomised clinical trial: vonoprazan versus lansoprazole for the initial relief of heartburn in patients with erosive oesophagitis

The presence of hiatal hernia is a significant predictor for symptomatic recurrence after cessation of vonoprazan therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a long-term observational study

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms frequently recur after cessation of acid blockers. The presence of a hiatal hernia may worsen GERD symptoms and increase the risk of esophageal malignancy. The aim of this study is to clarify the timing and predictors for recurrence of GERD symptoms after cessation of vonoprazan (VPZ) therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study involved 86 patients who underwent cessation of VPZ therapy for symptomatic GERD. Collated data from medical record review included the endoscopic findings and Izumo scale score.

RESULTS

The mean duration of continuous VPZ therapy before cessation was 7.9 months. GERD symptoms requiring the resumption of VPZ therapy recurred in 66 of 86 patients (77%). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that overall recurrence-free rates at 6 months, one and two years after VPZ cessation were 44%, 32% and 23%, respectively. Alcohol use, the presence of a hiatal hernia and long-term therapy for more than six months were identified as significant positive predictors for symptomatic recurrence. Notably, hiatal hernia had the highest hazard ratio in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The recurrence-free rate in patients with a hiatal hernia was much lower at 6 months than in patients without a hiatal hernia (15% and 51%, respectively p = 0.002). After the symptomatic recurrence, GERD symptoms improved significantly after one-month VPZ therapy.

CONCLUSION

The rate of symptomatic recurrence after VPZ cessation in patients with GERD is considerable. Cessation of acid suppression therapy should be cautious in patients with both a hiatal hernia and GERD.

Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors in Treating Erosive Esophagitis: A Meta-analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating erosive esophagitis (EE).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched using predefined search terms up to January 2024. Relevant randomized controlled trials were included. The outcoming were the EE healing rate and treatment-related adverse events incidence.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials involving 4012 patients were included. Patients receiving P-CAB exhibited a significantly better overall healing rate compared with PPI at week 2 [risk ratio (RR) = 1.06], but no statistical difference was observed at week 4 and week 8. Subgroup analysis revealed that P-CAB demonstrated a higher healing rate for patients with Los Angeles (LA) grade C/D, regardless of the assessment at week 2 (RR = 1.17), week 4 (RR = 1.10), or week 8 (RR = 1.08). However, no significant difference was found between PPI and P-CAB for patients with LA grade A/B at week 2, week 4, or week 8. Furthermore, patients treated with P-CAB had lower recurrence rates during maintenance therapy compared with PPI (RR = 0.79). In terms of safety, P-CAB was associated with a lower incidence of headache compared with PPI (RR = 0.32), with no statistical difference found in any treatment-related adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

P-CAB was found to be safe and effective for EE treatment compared with PPI, particularly in 2-week short-term treatment, severe EE (LA grade C/D) treatment, or maintenance therapy. Limitations such as potential heterogeneity among included trials should be considered in the interpretation of these findings.

Treatment Response With Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers Based on Clinical Phenotypes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

Background/Aims

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is typically managed based on the clinical phenotype. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) in patients with various clinical GERD phenotypes.

Methods

Core databases were searched for studies comparing PCABs and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in clinical GERD phenotypes of erosive reflux disease (ERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), PPI-resistant GERD and night-time heartburn. Additional analysis was performed based on disease severity and drug dosage, and pooled efficacy was calculated.

Results

In 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the initial treatment of ERD, the risk ratio for healing with PCABs versus PPIs was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.04-1.13) at 2 weeks and 1.03 (95% CI, 1.00-1.07) at 8 weeks, respectively. PCABs exhibited a significant increase in both initial and sustained healing of ERD compared to PPIs in RCTs, driven particularly in severe ERD (Los Angeles grade C/D). In 3 NERD RCTs, PCAB was superior to placebo in proportion of days without heartburn. Observational studies on PPI-resistant symptomatic GERD reported symptom frequency improvement in 86.3% of patients, while 90.7% showed improvement in PPIresistant ERD across 5 observational studies. Two RCTs for night-time heartburn had different endpoints, limiting meta-analysis. Pronounced hypergastrinemia was observed in patients treated with PCABs.

Conclusions

Compared to PPIs, PCABs have superior efficacy and faster therapeutic effect in the initial and maintenance therapy of ERD, particularly severe ERD. While PCABs may be an alternative treatment option in NERD and PPI-resistant GERD, findings were inconclusive in patients with night-time heartburn.

Efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid inhibitors in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease caused by reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as a first-line therapy to treat GERD. Recently, the potassium-competitive acid inhibitors have been increasingly in use in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of P-CABs in GERD.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web Of Science for publications regarding randomized controlled trials comparing potassium-competitive acid inhibitors to PPI monotherapy or Placebo with respect to efficacy and safety in GERD (until April 2023). The primary outcome was an absence or global symptom improvement and the incidence of adverse events in GERD. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the bias assessment tool recommended in the Cochrane Systematic Assessor's Handbook 5.1.0. We use RevMan 5.3 software for Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 991 screened studies, 14 studies including 4868 participants were analyzed. The ORs for the healing rates of GERD with P-CABs versus PPI/Placebo were 2.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-2.88), additionally, 1.09 (95% CI 1.05-1.14), 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.06) and 1.03 (95% CI 0.99-1.06) in Weeks 2, 4, and 8, respectively. The effectiveness rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (RR 1.73; 95% CI 1.27-2.36). The overall OR of Incidence of adverse events with P-CABs versus PPI/Placebo was 1.08 (95% CI 0.88-1.12). Overall, the risk of bias was low to some concerns. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the study's conclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that potassium-competitive acid inhibitors is non-inferior to PPIs as therapy for patients with GERD. The safety outcomes for potassium-competitive acid inhibitors are similar to those for PPIs.

Evaluating vonoprazan and tegoprazan for gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment in Chinese Healthcare: an EVIDEM framework analysis

BACKGROUND

In Chinese healthcare settings, drug selection decisions are predominantly influenced by the Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee (PTC). This study evaluates two recently introduced potassium-competitive acid blockers, vonoprazan (VPZ) and tegoprazan (TPZ), utilizing the Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking (EVIDEM) framework.

METHODS

The study employed the 10th edition of EVIDEM, which includes a core model with five domains and 13 criteria. Two independent expert panels were involved: the PTC expert panel, tasked with assigning weights using a 5-point scale, defining scoring indicators, examining the evidence matrix, scoring, and decision-making; and the evidence matrix expert panel, responsible for conducting a systematic literature review, creating the evidence matrix, and evaluating the value contributions of VPZ and TPZ.

RESULTS

The analysis estimated the value contributions of VPZ and TPZ to be 0.59 and 0.54, respectively. The domain of 'economic consequences of intervention' showed the most significant variation in value contribution between the two drugs, followed by 'comparative outcomes of intervention' and 'type of benefit of intervention'.

CONCLUSION

Employing the EVIDEM framework, VPZ's value contribution was found to be marginally superior to that of TPZ. The EVIDEM framework demonstrates potential for broader application in Chinese medical institutions.

Vonoprazan is superior to lansoprazole for healing of severe but not mild erosive esophagitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Healing rates of severe erosive esophagitis (EE; Los Angeles [LA] Grade C/D) in patients treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is suboptimal (~60-70%). Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is suggested to have better healing rates in patients with severe EE. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg versus lansoprazole 30 mg daily in healing EE, specifically in those with LA Grade C/D.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL on May 24, 2023. Studies that randomized EE patients to vonoprazan 20 mg daily or lansoprazole 30 mg daily and compared healing rates were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. The fixed-effect model was used to obtain the pooled efficacy and safety outcomes. Subgroup analysis was done to compare healing rates in mild (LA Grade A/B) versus severe EE and based on study location.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risks of bias comprising 2208 participants were included. Vonoprazan 20 mg was superior to lansoprazole 30 mg daily in healing severe EE at all weeks (Week 2 RR 1.294 [95% CI 1.169-1.433], Week 4 1.160 [1.059-1.270], and Week 8 1.175 [95% CI 1.107-1.247]), but was similar for mild EE at all weeks (P-interaction < 0.01). Vonoprazan 20 mg was more efficacious than lansoprazole 30 mg at Week 8 in Western versus Asian studies (P-interaction < 0.01). Any, serious, and drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan 20 mg is superior to lansoprazole 30 mg for healing severe EE but not mild EE. Vonoprazan 20 mg daily has a similar safety profile to lansoprazole 30 mg daily.

A Phase III Head-to-Head Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan and Esomeprazole in Treating Patients with Erosive Esophagitis

Background: Fexuprazan (Fexuclue®; Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). This multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, therapeutic confirmatory, phase III study was conducted to assess its efficacy and safety compared with esomeprazole (Nexium®; AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden) in Korean patients with erosive esophagitis (EE). Methods: This study evaluated patients diagnosed with EE at a total of 25 institutions in Korea between 13 December 2018 and 7 August 2019. After voluntarily submitting a written informed consent form, the patients were evaluated using a screening test and then randomized to either of the two treatment arms. The proportion of the patients who achieved the complete recovery of mucosal breaks at 4 and 8 weeks, the proportion of those who achieved the complete recovery of heartburn at 3 and 7 days and 8 weeks, and changes in the GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD-HRQL) scores at 4 and 8 weeks from baseline served as efficacy outcome measures. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and the serum gastrin levels served as safety outcome measures. Results: The study population comprised a total of 231 patients (n = 231) with EE, including 152 men (65.80%) and 79 women (34.20%); their mean age was 54.37 ± 12.66 years old. There were no significant differences in the efficacy and safety outcome measures between the two treatment arms (p > 0.05). Conclusions: It can be concluded that the efficacy and safety of Fexuclue® are not inferior to those of esomeprazole in Korean patients with EE.

The efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in treating erosive esophagitis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Fexuprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). This study aimed to explore the noninferior efficacy and safety of fexuprazan to esomeprazole in treating erosive esophagitis (EE).

METHODS

This was a phase III, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. Patients with endoscopically confirmed EE were randomized to receive fexuprazan 40 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg once a daily for 4-8 weeks. The healing rates of EE, symptom response, GERD-health-related quality life (GERD-HRQL), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were compared between fexuprazan group and esomeprazole group.

RESULTS

A total of 332 subjects were included in full analysis set (FAS) and 311 in per-protocol set (PPS). The healing rates of fexuprazan and esomeprazole groups at 8 weeks were 88.5% (146/165) and 89.0% (145/163), respectively, in FAS and 97.3% (145/149) and 97.9% (143/146), respectively, in PPS. Noninferiority of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole according to EE healing rates at 8 weeks was demonstrated in both FAS and PPS analysis. No significant difference was found between groups in EE healing rates at 4 weeks, symptom responses, and changes of GERD-HRQL. The incidence of drug-related AEs was 19.4% (32/165) in fexuprazan arm and 19.6% (32/163) in esomeprazole arm.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated noninferior efficacy of fexuprazan to esomeprazole in treating EE. The incidence of TEAEs was similar between fexuprazan and esomeprazole. Trial registration number NCT05813561.

The Effect of Tegoprazan on the Treatment of Endoscopic Resection-Induced Artificial Ulcers: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study

Background/Aims

: Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has beneficial effects on acid-related disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer diseases. This study aimed to validate the effect of tegoprazan on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced artificial ulcers.

Methods

: Patients from 16 centers in Korea who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia were enrolled. After ESD, pantoprazole was administered intravenously for 48 hours. The patients were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan or esomeprazole group. Tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg were administered for 4 weeks, after which gastroscopic evaluation was performed. If the artificial ulcer had not healed, the same dose of tegoprazan or esomeprazole was administered for an additional 4 weeks, and a gastroscopic evaluation was performed.

Results

: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in this study. The healing rates of artificial ulcers at 4 weeks were 30.3% (23/76) and 22.1% (15/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.006). At 8 weeks after ESD, the cumulative ulcer healing rates were 73.7% (56/76) and 77.9% (53/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.210). Delayed bleeding occurred in two patients in the tegoprazan group (2.6%) and in one patient in the esomeprazole group (1.5%). Other adverse events were negligible in both groups.

Conclusions

: Tegoprazan showed similar effects on post-ESD artificial ulcer healing in comparison with esomeprazole.

BRAZILIAN CLINICAL GUIDELINE FOR THE THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (BRAZILIAN FEDERATION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, FBG)

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition in Brazil, affecting 12% to 20% of the urban population, with significant implications for patient quality of life and potential for complications.

OBJECTIVE

This paper focuses on the recent update of the Brazilian guidelines for GERD, a necessary revision due to advancements in knowledge and practice since the last publication over a decade ago. The update pays particular attention to the role and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), acknowledging the growing concerns about their long-term use, adverse events, and overprescription.

METHODS

The methodology of the guideline update involved an extensive literature review in multiple languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese), drawing from major databases such as Medline, Embase, and SciELO-Lilacs.

RESULTS

This comprehensive approach resulted in a carefully curated selection of studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, specifically focusing on PPIs and other therapeutic strategies for GERD. The updated guidelines are presented in a user-friendly question-and-answer format, adhering to the PICO system (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) for clarity and ease of interpretation. The recommendations are supported by robust scientific evidence and expert opinions, enhancing their practical applicability in clinical settings. To ensure the reliability and clarity of the recommendations, the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was employed. This system categorizes the strength of recommendations as strong, weak, or conditional and classifies evidence quality as high, moderate, low, or very low. These classifications provide insight into the confidence level of each recommendation and the likelihood of future research impacting these guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The primary aim of these updated guidelines is to offer practical, evidence-based advice for the management of GERD in Brazil, ensuring that healthcare professionals are equipped with the latest knowledge and tools to deliver optimal patient care.

BACKGROUND

•Gastrointestinal specialists rely heavily on guidelines to manage digestive pathologies effectively. The Brazilian clinical guideline for therapeutic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an invaluable tool for these specialists.

BACKGROUND

•It critically analyzes practical aspects of therapy through 12 questions covering a wide range of topics, from behavioral measures to surgical and endoscopic indications.

BACKGROUND

•The recommendations in this guideline are justified using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation), and experienced experts provide comments and suggestions at the end of each question.

Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Versus Proton Pump Inhibitor: A Pilot Study on Comparable Efficacy in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux-Related Cough

Acid inhibitors have been considered in treating gastroesophageal reflux-related cough (GERC). Compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have more potent and durable effects on anti-acid secretion. However, whether vonoprazan and esomeprazole have different therapeutic effects on GERC remains unknown. Patients diagnosed with GERC were enrolled in our study and randomly treated with vonoprazan (20 mg, once daily, P-CAB) or esomeprazole (20 mg, twice daily, PPI) for two months. A prokinetic agent was also administered. Patients were followed up once a month. Cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as the primary outcome, while cough symptom score (CSS) and scores for cough-related quality-of-life or reflux-related symptoms were the secondary endpoints. A total of 50 patients completed the study, with 25 patients in each group. P-CAB and PPI groups showed similar decreases in cough severity VAS and CSS scores after the 2-month treatment (all P < 0.001). For quality-of-life, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score increased significantly from baseline in both groups, but the P-CAB group had greater improvement and a higher LCQ score in month 2 (all P ≤ 0.05). For reflux-related symptoms, the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) score declined substantially over time in the P-CAB group, while the reflux symptom index (RSI) score decreased in both groups. The P-CAB group tended to have a lower HARQ (P = 0.051) and RSI (P = 0.069) scores in month 2. In conclusion, vonoprazan may be comparable to esomeprazole in cough symptom relief in GERC during the 2-month treatment period, but possibly provides better gains on classic reflux symptoms and quality-of-life. The long-term efficacy of P-CABs on GERC may be worth further exploration. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200067089.

Different dosages of vonoprazan for gastroesophageal reflux disease: study protocol for a pragmatic, crossover-cluster, randomized controlled trial with patient preference arms

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan results in more potent acid suppression for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than proton pump inhibitors. It has only been approved for treating erosive esophagitis in China, but 30-40% of GERD patients cannot achieve the goal of treatment with vonoprazan 20 mg daily. This study aims to investigate whether vonoprazan could relieve the symptoms of Chinese patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and whether increased dosage or different times of dosing could increase the response rate of GERD.

METHODS

This study is a pragmatic, open-label, crossover-cluster, randomized controlled trial with patient preference arms. Two thousand eight hundred eighty patients with GERD from 48 hospitals in China will be enrolled. These hospitals will be divided into a compulsory randomization cluster (24 hospitals) and a patient preference cluster (24 hospitals). Patients in the compulsory randomization cluster will be randomized to three regimens according to the crossover-cluster randomization. Patients in the patient preference cluster may choose to receive any regimen if they have a preference; otherwise, patients will be randomly assigned. The three treatment regimens will last 4 weeks, including (1) vonoprazan 20 mg p.o. after breakfast, (2) vonoprazan 20 mg p.o. after dinner, and (3) vonoprazan 20 mg p.o. after breakfast and after dinner. Patients will attend a baseline visit, a 4-week e-diary, a fourth-week visit, and a sixth-month visit online. The primary outcome is the symptom relief rate of all patients after 4-week therapy. Secondary outcomes include the healing rate of EE patients, the severity of symptoms, compliance with the therapy at the fourth-week follow-up visit, recurrent symptoms, and the frequency of self-conscious doctor visits at the sixth-month follow-up visit.

DISCUSSION

This trial will explore the effectiveness of different regimens of vonoprazan that will be implemented with GERD patients in China. The randomization with patient preferences considered and the crossover-cluster component may improve the robustness and extrapolation of study conclusions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2300069857. Registered on 28 March 2023.

PROTOCOL VERSION

February 18, 2023, Version 2.

Efficacy and Safety of Fexuprazan in Patients with Acute or Chronic Gastritis

Background/Aims

Fexuprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that could be of benefit to patients with gastric mucosal injury. The aim of this study was to assess the 2-week efficacy and safety of fexuprazan in patients with acute or chronic gastritis.

Methods

In this study, 327 patients with acute or chronic gastritis who had one or more gastric erosions on endoscopy and subjective symptoms were randomized into three groups receiving fexuprazan 20 mg once a day (q.d.), fexuprazan 10 mg twice a day (b.i.d.), or placebo for 2 weeks. The posttreatment assessments were the primary endpoint (erosion improvement rate), secondary endpoints (cure rates of erosion and edema and improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and subjective symptoms), and drug-related adverse events.

Results

Among the patients, 57.8% (59/102), 65.7% (67/102), and 40.6% (39/96) showed erosion improvement 2 weeks after receiving fexuprazan 20 mg q.d., fexuprazan 10 mg b.i.d., and placebo, respectively. Both fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. showed superior efficacy to the placebo (p=0.017 and p<0.001, respectively). Likewise, both fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. also showed higher erosion healing rates than the placebo (p=0.033 and p=0.010, respectively). No difference was noted in the edema healing rate and the improvement rates for redness, hemorrhage, and subjective symptoms between the fexuprazan and placebo groups. No significant difference was noted in the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

Conclusions

Fexuprazan 20 mg q.d. and 10 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks showed therapeutic efficacy superior to that of placebo in patients with acute or chronic gastritis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04341454).

Vonoprazan versus lansoprazole in erosive esophagitis - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of treatment in erosive esophagitis (EE). An alternative to PPIs in EE is Vonoprazan, a potassium competitive acid blocker. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vonoprazan to lansoprazole.

METHODS

Multiple databases searched through November 2022. Meta-analysis was performed to assess endoscopic healing at two, four and eight weeks, including for patients with severe EE (Los Angeles C/D). Serious adverse events (SAE) leading to drug discontinuation were assessed. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

RESULTS

Four RCTs with 2208 patients were included in the final analysis. Vonoprazan 20 mg once-daily was compared to lansoprazole 30 mg once-daily dosing. Among all patients, at two and eight weeks post-treatment, vonoprazan resulted in significantly higher rates of endoscopic healing as compared to lansoprazole, risk ratios (RR) 1.1, p<0.001 and RR 1.04, p=0.03. The same effect was not observed at four weeks, RR 1.03 (CI 0.99-1.06, I2=0%) following therapy. Among patients with severe EE, vonoprazan resulted in higher rates of endoscopic healing at two weeks, RR 1.3 (1.2-1.4, I2=47%), p=<0.001, at four weeks, RR 1.2 (1.1-1.3, I2=36%), p=<0.001 and at eight weeks post-treatment, RR 1.1 (CI 1.03-1.3, I2=79%), p=0.009. We found no significant difference in the overall pooled rate of SAE and pooled rate of adverse events leading to drug discontinuation. Finally, the overall certainty of evidence for our main summary estimates was rated as high (grade A).

CONCLUSION

Based on limited number of published non-inferiority RCTs, our analysis demonstrates that among patients with EE, vonoprazan 20 mg once-daily dosing achieves comparable and in those with severe EE, higher endoscopic healing rates as compared to lansoprazole 30 mg once-daily dosing. Both drugs have a comparable safety profile.

Effects of Tegoprazan Versus Esomeprazole on Nighttime Heartburn and Sleep Quality in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Aims

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently experience nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbance. Tegoprazan is a new potassium-competitive acid blocker that can rapidly block acid secretion. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of tegoprazan compared with esomeprazole in relieving nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbances.

Methods

Patients with erosive esophagitis, nighttime heartburn, and sleep disturbances were randomized to receive tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to first nighttime heartburn-free interval. The percentage of nighttime heartburn-free days was also compared between the 2 groups.

Results

A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study. Time to the first nighttime heartburn-free interval was shorter with tegoprazan than with esomeprazole but the difference was not statistically significant (1.5 days vs 3 days, P = 0.151). The percentage of nighttime heartburn-free days was higher in the tegoprazan group but the difference was insignificant (57.8% vs 43.1%, P = 0.107). Adverse events occurred in 2 patients. They were mild in severity.

Conclusions

Tegoprazan may induce faster relief of nighttime heartburn symptoms and may improve sleep disorders associated with nighttime heartburn. Further large-scale studies are required to validate our findings.

Incidence and type of adverse events in patients taking vonoprazan: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Vonoprazan, a novel acid-suppressive drug, is non-inferior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of gastric acid-related diseases. However, the safety of vonoprazan has not been systematically evaluated yet.

Objectives

To elucidate the incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) in patients taking vonoprazan.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all studies reporting the safety of vonoprazan. The incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, AEs leading to drug discontinuation, and common AEs were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the incidence of AEs between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs.

Results

Seventy-seven studies were included. The pooled incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation were 20, 7, 1, and 1%, respectively. The incidences of any AEs (OR = 0.96, p = 0.66), drug-related AEs (OR = 1.10, p = 0.44), serious AEs (OR = 1.14, p = 0.36), and AEs leading to drug discontinuation (OR = 1.09, p = 0.55) were not significantly different between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs. In subgroup analyses, patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) had higher incidences of any AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation than those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, and artificial ulcer after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), but patients with H. pylori infection had a higher incidence of drug-related AEs than those with PUD, GERD, and artificial ulcer after gastric ESD. The incidence of AEs was higher in patients taking long-term use of vonoprazan than those taking short-term use of vonoprazan.

Conclusion

Vonoprazan is well tolerated and shows similar safety compared to PPIs. The safety of vonoprazan may be primarily influenced by its indications and duration.

Registration

PROSPERO CRD42022314982.

Long-term changes in serum gastrin levels during standard dose vonoprazan therapy

BACKGROUND

Long-term acid suppression during vonoprazan therapy causes hypergastrinemia which may induce gastric mucosal changes such as fundic gland and hyperplastic polyps. The aim of this study is to clarify the long-term changes in serum gastrin levels and risk factors for hypergastrinemia.

METHODS

From July 2016 to April 2020, 48 patients receiving vonoprazan 10 mg once daily for more than one year were reviewed. Serum gastrin level was evaluated by radioimmunoassay in a fasting condition (reference range 37-172 pg/ml).

RESULTS

The baseline median gastrin level was 100 (range, 54-415) pg/ml. The gastrin level over 4 years was 700-1200 pg/ml, which plateaued at 1.5 years. Multivariate analysis revealed factors associated with gastrin levels 12 months after starting vonoprazan and identified severe gastric atrophy as a significant positive risk factor (p = .046). The gastrin level over 4 years in patients with severe gastric atrophy and no atrophy was approximately 900-1500 and 500-1000 pg/ml, respectively. Female gender was also identified as a positive factor, although it was not statistically significant (p = .087). The gastrin level over 4 years in females was approximately 900-1300 pg/ml, greater than in males (500-900 pg/ml).

CONCLUSION

A continued increase in gastrin levels was not found during long-term vonoprazan therapy. Severe gastric atrophy is a significant risk factor for hypergastrinemia.

Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared with esomeprazole in erosive esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Fexuprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, reversibly suppresses the K⁺/H⁺-ATPase enzyme in proton pumps within gastric parietal cells. Fexuprazan’s suppression of gastric acid was maintained in healthy individuals for 24 h in a dose-dependent manner.

AIM

To compare fexuprazan to esomeprazole and establish its efficacy and safety in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE).

METHODS

Korean adult patients with endoscopically confirmed EE were randomized 1:1 to receive fexuprazan 40 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with healed EE confirmed by endoscopy at week 8. The secondary endpoints included the healing rate of EE at week 4, symptom response, and quality of life assessment. Safety profiles and serum gastrin levels were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Of the 263 randomized, 218 completed the study per protocol (fexuprazan 40 mg, n = 107; esomeprazole 40 mg, n = 111). Fexuprazan was non-inferior to esomeprazole regarding the healing rate at week 8 [99.1% (106/107) vs 99.1% (110/111)]. There were no between-group differences in the EE healing rate at week 4 [90.3% (93/103) vs 88.5% (92/104)], symptom responses, and quality of life assessments. Additionally, serum gastrin levels at weeks 4 and 8 and drug-related side effects did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Fexuprazan 40 mg is non-inferior to esomeprazole 40 mg in EE healing at week 8. We suggest that fexuprazan is an alternative promising treatment option to PPIs for patients with EE.

The role of vonoprazan in patients with erosive esophagitis

Acid suppression is the primary therapy for erosive esophagitis (EE). Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are considered as the first-line medication for EE, 10-20% of patients with Los Angeles C and D grade EE do not gain complete mucosal healing and symptom control despite 8-week double-dose PPI treatment. Vonoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), which blocks the H⁺, K⁺-adenosine triphosphatase enzymes in a K⁺-competitive and reversible manner. Vonoprazan exhibits different pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profiles from conventional PPIs, and has a rapid, potent and sustained acid inhibitory effect. In this review, we summarized and discussed current evidence regarding the role of vonoprazan in terms of mucosal healing, maintaining remission and symptom relief for the management of EE, including the initial and maintenance treatment of EE, as well as for PPI-resistant EE patients. Safety concerns and cost-effectiveness analysis of vonoprazan were also mentioned in the article. As a potent and well-tolerated acid blocker, vonoprazan has the potential to become a novel option for the management of EE.

Potassium-competitive acid blockers and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the most commonly used antisecretory medi-cations in the management of reflux illness, virtually eliminate elective surgery for ulcer disease, and relegate anti-reflux surgery to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are inadequately managed by medical therapy. However, PPI medications still leave some therapeutic demands of GERD unmet. Furthermore, up to 40%-55% of daily PPI users have chronic symptoms, due to PPI refractoriness. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) transcend many of the problems and limits of PPIs, delivering quick, powerful, and extended acid suppression and allowing for treatment of numerous unmet needs. Recently, it has become clear that compromised mucosal integrity plays a role in the etiology of GERD. As a result, esophageal mucosal protection has emerged as a novel and potential treatment approach. An increasing body of research demonstrates that when P-CABs are used as primary drugs or add-on drugs (to regular treatment), they provide a considerable extra benefit, particularly in alleviating symptoms that do not respond to PPI therapy.

Network Meta-analysis Comparing Vonoprazan and Proton Pump Inhibitors for Heartburn Symptoms in Erosive Esophagitis

GOALS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the relative efficacy of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on early heartburn symptom resolution in patients with erosive esophagitis.

BACKGROUND

Limited available data directly compare the efficacy of vonoprazan, a first-in-class potassium-competitive acid blocker, with PPIs in erosive esophagitis.

STUDY

We conducted a systematic literature review (in MEDLINE and CENTRAL) and subsequent network meta-analysis according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials in adults with erosive esophagitis treated with vonoprazan or a PPI were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes were heartburn symptom resolution rate on Day 1 and Day 7. The study was performed with all available data, using a random effects model within a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis. For heartburn resolution rate on Day 1 (9 of 10 trials), vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (QD) was superior to placebo (median odds ratio=16.75, 95% credible interval: 2.16-207.80). Point estimates numerically favored vonoprazan 20 mg QD over other comparators. For heartburn resolution rate on Day 7 (10 of 10 trials), vonoprazan 20 mg QD was superior to placebo and other comparators except rabeprazole 20 mg QD. Point estimates numerically favored vonoprazan 20 mg QD over rabeprazole 20 mg QD.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, vonoprazan 20 mg QD was equally effective in heartburn resolution on Day 1, and equally or more effective on Day 7 versus PPIs in adults with erosive esophagitis.

An update of pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of vonoprazan in acid-related disorders

INTRODUCTION

Patients with acid-related disorders (ARDs) of the upper digestive tract remain highly prevalent and need to be continuously investigated to improve their management.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a summary of the most recent advancements in the treatment of ARDs with particular focus on the new drugs available to overcome the unmet needs of traditional therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Proton pump inhibitors remain the best therapy in treating ARDs, but a consistent proportion of these patients continues to present mucosal lesions or to experience symptoms despite treatment. These cases pertain mainly to the most severe forms of erosive esophagitis or to non-erosive reflux disease. Also, the increasing rate of patients with H. pylori infection not responding to eradication therapy represents a difficult clinical condition. The recent advent of a new class of antisecretory drugs, such as the potassium competitive acid blockers and, among them the most studied vonoprazan, which are characterized by a better pharmacological profile than PPIs (rapid onset of action, longer lasting acid suppression, control of nocturnal acidity), has the potential to overcome the above-mentioned unmet needs. More research should be done to assess their efficacy in Western populations and their safety in patients treated in the long term.

Influence of daily versus alternate-day dosing of vonoprazan on intragastric pH, serum gastrin, and the antiplatelet function of clopidogrel : Influence of alternate-day dosing of vonoprazan

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, inhibits gastric acid secretion and attenuates the antiplatelet function of clopidogrel more potently than esomeprazole. We investigated whether alternate-day dosing of vonoprazan might avoid this interaction with clopidogrel while providing sufficient gastric acid inhibition.

METHODS

Following 24 h of pH monitoring (control regimen), 12 healthy volunteers received three regimens (clopidogrel-only regimen: clopidogrel 75 mg daily [q.d.]; vonoprazan alternate-day regimen: vonoprazan 10 mg every other day [q.o.d.] + clopidogrel 75 mg q.d.; vonoprazan daily regimen: vonoprazan 10 mg q.d. + clopidogrel 75 mg q.d.) for 14 days in a randomized open-label crossover manner. Intragastric pH monitoring was performed for 24 h on day 13 in the clopidogrel-only and vonoprazan q.d. regimens and for 48 h on days 13 and 14 in the vonoprazan q.o.d. regimen. Serum gastrin and inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) were measured before the commencement of pH monitoring in each regimen.

RESULTS

Twelve volunteers completed the study. Equivalent median IPA values in the q.o.d. and q.d. regimens were measured (21.8% and 25%, respectively) and were significantly lower than that with the clopidogrel-only regimen (40.8%). The median pH4 holding time ratio for the vonoprazan q.o.d. regimen (49.7%) was superior to that of the clopidogrel-only regimen (18.4%), but was significantly inferior to that of the vonoprazan q.d. regimen (77.0%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Alternate-day administration of vonoprazan could not prevent the interaction between vonoprazan and clopidogrel, and acid inhibition was inferior to that with vonoprazan daily administration. Alternate-day administration of vonoprazan thus appears to be of questionable clinical utility.

A study for every second day administration of vonoprazan for maintenance treatment of erosive GERD (ESD von GERD): a multicenter randomized cross-over study

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan is a potassium competitive acid blocker used to treat erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with stronger, more stable acid-suppressing effects than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study clarified the usefulness and superiority of vonoprazan administered every second day over PPIs in the maintenance therapy of erosive GERD.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, two-period randomized cross-over study. Patients were randomized to either the vonoprazan-lansoprazole (VP-LZ) group, who were given vonoprazan 10 mg for the first 4 weeks and then lansoprazole 15 mg for the next 4 weeks both administered once every second day, or the lansoprazole-vonoprazan (LZ-VP) group, who were treated in reverse. GERD symptoms were compared using symptom diaries, the frequency scale for symptoms of GERD (FSSG), and the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS).

RESULTS

We enrolled 122 patients between December 2017 and May 2019. Symptoms were well controlled in vonoprazan administration and lansoprazole administration were 93.6% and 82.1%, respectively, with a significant difference on McNemar's test (P = 0.003). During the second 4 weeks, 94.4% and 76.7% of patients in the VP-LZ and LZ-VP groups, respectively, were well controlled following for ≥ 6 consecutive days a week (P = 0.009). During the first 4 weeks, 96.7% and 80.0% of patients were well controlled with < 1 weekly in the VP-LZ and LZ-VP groups, respectively, during the first 4 weeks (P = 0.007). GERD symptoms, assessed via FSSG and GSRS, significantly decreased with vonoprazan administration once every second day.

CONCLUSIONS

Vonoprazan administered once every second day could be an effective alternative to PPIs in the maintenance treatment of erosive GERD (UMIN000030393).

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021

In Japan, with the increasing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and growing public interest, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology issued Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for GERD (1st edition) in 2009 and a revised 2nd edition in 2015. A number of studies on GERD were subsequently conducted in Japan and abroad, and vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), became available for the first time in Japan in February 2015. The revised 3rd edition (Japanese edition), which incorporates new findings and information, was published in April 2021. These guidelines are summarized herein, particularly sections related to the treatment of GERD. The important clinical issues addressed in the present revision are (i) the introduction of treatment algorithms that classify GERD into reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease, (ii) the clarification of treatment algorithms based on to the severity of reflux esophagitis, and (iii) the positioning of vonoprazan in the treatment for GERD. The present guidelines propose vonoprazan as the initial/maintenance treatment for severe reflux esophagitis. They also recommend vonoprazan or PPI as an initial treatment for mild reflux esophagitis and recommended PPI and proposed vonoprazan as maintenance treatment. These updated guidelines offer the best clinical strategies for GERD patients in Japan and hope that they will be of global use for the diagnosis and treatment for GERD.

Vonoprazan for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Research advances

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common gastrointestinal disease that can be effectively treated by drugs alone. Proton pump inhibitors are the currently mainstay drugs for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, but are insufficiently effective. Vonoprazan, which is a new type of drug that inhibits gastric acid secretion, has been employed for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In this article, we comprehensively review the current evidence regarding clinical efficacy and safety of vonoprazan for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease to guide the clinical decision.

Treatment strategies for reflux esophagitis including a potassium-competitive acid blocker: A cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common condition, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstays of treatment. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of PPIs. A potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), vonoprazan (VPZ), was recently introduced, which may provide clinical benefits. This study was performed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of alternative long-term strategies including continuous and discontinuous treatment with VPZ for the management of reflux esophagitis in Japan.

METHODS

A health state transition model was developed to capture the long-term management of reflux esophagitis. Four different strategies were compared: (a) intermittent PPI using lansoprazole (LPZ); (b) intermittent P-CAB; (c) maintenance PPI using LPZ; and (d) maintenance P-CAB.

RESULTS

Intermittent P-CAB was the most cost-effective, and the number of days for which medication was required with this strategy was fewest. Maintenance PPI was more efficacious, but more costly than intermittent P-CAB. Maintenance P-CAB was more efficacious, but more costly than maintenance PPI. Co-payments were higher for maintenance PPI than for intermittent P-CAB, and for maintenance P-CAB than for maintenance PPI, which were considered reasonable for the majority of patients to improve symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent P-CAB appears to be the strategy of choice for the majority of reflux esophagitis patients in clinical practice. If a patient is not satisfied with the symptom control of the current strategy, switching to a more effective strategy appears to be a reasonable option for the majority of patients.

Sorting out the Relationship between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Sleep

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most common conditions encountered by primary care physicians, gastroenterologists, foregut surgeons and otolaryngologists. While approximately 50% of patients experience nocturnal reflux symptoms, the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleep is often overlooked. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the current understanding of this relationship and its clinical implications. Recent studies pertaining to the association between GERD and sleep with focus on sleep disturbances, obstructive sleep apnea, extraesophageal manifestations of GERD and treatment are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a close relationship between GERD and sleep disturbances, but the nature of this relationship remains to be elucidated. Similarly, new data supports the association between GERD and obstructive sleep apnea, but whether this association is independent of confounding risk factors remains unresolved. Extraesophageal manifestations due to nocturnal GERD are primarily respiratory and can be explained by microaspiration and vagally-induced bronchospasm. Treatment of nocturnal GERD, both pharmacologically and surgically, improves sleep quality. Conversely, pharmacologic treatment of sleep disorders can improve nocturnal GERD symptoms. There is a bi-directional relationship between GERD and sleep. GERD is associated with various sleep disturbances. Sleep deficiency can exacerbate GERD. There is an association between extraesophageal manifestations and nocturnal GERD. Treatment directed towards GERD can improve sleep experience, and treatment directed to improve sleep can improve GERD symptoms.

Evaluations of Gastric Acid Pocket Using Novel Vertical 8-Channel pH Monitoring System and Effects of Acid Secretion Inhibitors

Background/Aims

The gastric acid pocket has an important role in gastroesophageal reflux disease development. In this study, we utilized a novel 8-channel pH monitoring system with sensor intervals of 1 cm on the vertical axis for evaluation of postprandial gastric acid pocket in healthy Japanese adults, as well as the effects of vonoprazan and rabeprazole.

Methods

Twelve healthy volunteers without Helicobacter pylori infection were enrolled. A catheter was inserted transnasally and positioned under X-ray guidance, then postprandial acid pocket formation was monitored over time in a sitting position. Thereafter, acid pocket changes were assessed following administration of vonoprazan (20 mg) or rabeprazole (20 mg).

Results

The gastric acid pocket was successfully measured by use of the present system in 10 cases, while failure occurred in 2 because of inappropriate catheter positioning. Observed acid pockets were visualized with a mean length of 2.2 ± 0.4 channels on the top layer of food contents approximately 20 minutes after finishing a meal. There were some variations for lasting time of the acid pocket. Complete elimination within 3 hours after administration of vonoprazan was noted in all cases. Likewise, following administration of rabeprazole, the acid pocket was eliminated in 7 cases, while acidity was reduced though the pocket remained observable in 3.

Conclusions

Gastric acid pocket observations were possible using our novel vertical 8-channel sensor catheter. The present findings showed that vonoprazan strongly suppressed acid secretion within a short period, suggesting its effectiveness for gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment.

Efficacy of vonoprazan 10 mg compared with 20 mg for the initial treatment in patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of vonoprazan 10 mg compared with 20 mg in patients with erosive esophagitis.

METHOD

Seventy-three patients with erosive esophagitis were randomly divided into two groups either vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 37) or 10 mg (n = 36). They were administered each dose for 4 weeks as the initial treatment followed by maintenance treatment with 10 mg for 8 weeks. The primary endpoints were mucosal healing rate and symptom relief at 4 weeks. The secondary endpoint was symptom relief at 12 weeks after the maintenance treatment. Mucosal healing was assessed endoscopically, and symptom relief was assessed using the FSSG score.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, the endoscopic healing rates of the 20 mg and 10 mg groups were 94.6% and 94.4%, respectively. The FSSG scores of the 20 mg and 10 mg groups were significantly decreased in both treatment groups from 13 (4-39) to 4 (0-25) and 14 (4-40) to 3 (0-29), respectively. At 12 weeks, the scores further decreased to 2 (0-13) and 2 (0-26), respectively. The vonoprazan 10 mg group showed a similar therapeutic effect to the 20 mg group in mucosal healing at 4 weeks and in symptom relief throughout the study period. When stratified by esophagitis grading, these findings were still demonstrated in grade A/B patients but not in grade C/D patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that initial treatment with vonoprazan 10 mg might be useful especially in patients with mild erosive esophagitis. Large controlled studies are warranted to confirm our investigation.

Application of potassium competitive acid blockers in acid-related diseases

Acid-related diseases (ARDs) are common chronic diseases of the digestive system. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have become the first-line drugs for the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, PPIs display some limitations in clinical application, such as short half-life, slow action, insufficient acid inhibition, pharmacological effects affected by CYP2C19 gene polymorphism, and nocturnal acid breakthrough, which lead to insufficient symptom remission of ARDs, as well as refractoriness, relapse, and even direct decline in health-related quality of life and increased economic burden. Potassium competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are a class of novel anti-secretory drugs, which can overcome the limitations of traditional PPIs and show satisfactory acid inhibition effect and safety in clinical application. They may become a new strategy to solve the unsatisfied medical needs in the treatment of ARDs, but their potential adverse reactions remain to be monitored. In this article, we review the challenges in the treatment of acid-related diseases, and the advantages and prospects of P-CABs in the prevention and treatment of ARDs.

Pharmacological Management of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease: An Update of the State-of-the-Art

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent, chronic disorder, whose knowledge remains limited and the management of these patients changes continuously. This review provides a summary of the most recent advancements in the pathogenesis of this disease and the new drugs introduced into the market to overcome some of the unmet needs of traditional therapies. Nowadays, the most fruitful diagnostic examinations are 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring, which allows us to separate true NERD from esophageal functional disorders and high-resolution manometry, which helps to exclude the existence of motility disorders sharing the same symptoms of GERD. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain the first-choice therapy in the treatment of GERD, but a consistent proportion of these patients continue to experience symptoms despite their intake. These cases pertain mainly to the subpopulation with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and represent very challenging clinical situations, because it is mandatory to understand the reasons for PPI failure. The management of these difficult patients requires necessarily to test them and avoid the use of empiric treatments that are often unsuccessful, costly and potentially dangerous. Recently, several new drugs have been used to increase the defensive properties of this mucosa with promising results in randomized clinical trials.

Direct Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan Versus Proton-Pump Inhibitors for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder, and is typically treated with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) as the recommended first-line therapy. Recently, a new potassium-competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, was launched in Japan. It is uncertain whether the standard dose of vonoprazan 20 mg is superior to that of PPIs for GERD, so a direct comparison of the therapeutic effects and adverse events between vonoprazan 20 mg and PPIs is needed.

METHODS

MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were chosen as the literature sources. Randomized controlled trials for vonoprazan 20 mg and PPIs published in English were searched. Data from studies meeting the eligibility criteria were extracted individually by two researchers and compared to maintain consistency.

RESULTS

Fifty-six articles were identified in the databases, and one study was manually searched and added to the analysis, ultimately yielding six eligible studies. For the main analysis, the risk ratios (RR) of efficacy and adverse events between vonoprazan and PPIs were 1.06 (0.99-1.13) and 1.08 (0.96-1.22), respectively. Subgroup analysis for patients with severe esophagitis at baseline showed significantly higher results for vonoprazan than lansoprazole, with an RR of 1.14 (1.06-1.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that vonoprazan is non-inferior to PPIs as therapy for patients with GERD. Subgroup analysis indicates that vonoprazan is more effective than PPIs for patients with severe erosive esophagitis. The safety outcomes for vonoprazan are similar to those for PPIs.

Revaprazan prevented indomethacin-induced intestinal damages by enhancing tight junction related mechanisms

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly prescribed medications for alleviating pain and inflammation but may cause gastrointestinal tract damage. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) prevent NSAID-induced gastric damage but may aggravate intestinal damage via dysbiosis and intestinal permeability alteration. Currently, there is growing interest regarding the influence of potassium competitive acid blockers (PCAB) on NSAID-induced enteropathy. Here, we investigated the relative changes in indomethacin-induced enteropathy by combining indomethacin with pantoprazole (as PPI) or revaprazan (as PCAB). We examined intestinal permeability-related molecular changes in in vitro Caco-2 cell models and in an in vivo indomethacin-induced enteropathy rat model. Indomethacin alone or in combination with pantoprazole significantly increased relative lucifer yellow dye flux and decreased relative trans-epithelial electrical resistance and tight junction protein (TJP) expression compare to normal cells. In contrast, indomethacin combined with revaprazan significantly preserved TJPs compare to indomethacin-treated cells. MLC phosphorylation, Rho activation, and ERK activation responsible for TJP were significantly increased by indomethacin alone or a combination of indomethacin and pantoprazole but not by a combination of indomethacin and revaprazan. Intestinal damage scores significantly increased with indomethacin and pantoprazole combination but not with indomethacin and revaprazan combination. Indomethacin and pantoprazole combination significantly activated Rho-GTPase, p-MLC, and p-ERK but significantly decreased TJP expression. However, indomethacin and revaprazan combination significantly preserved TJPs and inactivated Rho-GTPase, MLC, and ERK. Hence, revaprazan rather than PPIs should be co-administered with NSAIDs to mitigate NSAID-induced intestinal damage.

Is a proton-pump inhibitor necessary after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms? A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the efficacy of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in the management of esophageal ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of PPI in ulcer healing following ESD for superficial esophageal neoplasms, using a propensity score analytic approach.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single referral center. Between April 2005 and August 2015, 199 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal cancer and esophageal dysplasia underwent ESD. For patients with PPI administration, intravenous PPI therapy was commenced immediately after ESD, and oral PPI was administered daily from post-operative day 3, until ulcer healing was identified. We compared the remnant-ulcer rate at 4 weeks after esophageal ESD between the PPI administration and non-PPI groups, using propensity scores and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

RESULTS

After exclusions, a total of 88 patients were analyzed. The remnant-ulcer rate at 4 weeks after ESD was 25.5% (12/47) and 14.6% (6/41) in the PPI administration and non-PPI groups (p = 0.21). After adjusting for background factors using IPTW, the risk of a remnant ulcer in the PPI administration group was not decreased significantly compared with that in the non-PPI group [odds ratio (OR) = 2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-7.97, p = 0.15]. Furthermore, PPI therapy did not decrease significantly the remnant-ulcer rate on logistic regression analysis after adjusting for the propensity score (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 0.69-8.32, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

PPI administration does not promote ulcer healing after ESD for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The Potential Benefits of Vonoprazan as Helicobacter pylori Infection Therapy

Helicobacter pylori infection is a severe global health problem that is closely associated with acid-related diseases and gastric malignancies. Eradicating H. pylori is strongly recommended for lowering peptic ulcer recurrence and preventing gastric cancer. The current approved H. pylori eradication regimen combines a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with two antibiotics. Unfortunately, this regimen failed to meet expectations mostly due to antibiotic resistance and insufficient gastric acid suppression. Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, showed promising results as a PPI replacement. Vonoprazan inhibits gastric acid secretion by acting as a reversible competitive inhibitor against potassium ions and forming disulfide bonds with the cysteine molecule of H⁺/K⁺-ATPase. Vonoprazan has superior pharmacological characteristics over PPI, such as no requirement for acid activation, stability in acidic conditions, shorter optimum acid suppression period, and resistance to cytochrome P (CYP)2C19 polymorphism. Several comparative randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses revealed the superiority of vonoprazan in eradicating H. pylori, notably the resistant strains. The adverse effect caused by vonoprazan is long-term acid suppression that may induce elevated gastrin serum, hypochlorhydria, and malabsorption. All vonoprazan studies have only been conducted in Japan. Further studies outside Japan are necessary for universally conclusive results.

Design characteristics of comparative effectiveness trials for the relief of symptomatic dyspepsia: A systematic review

Background

Dyspepsia represents a symptom domain rather than a diagnostic condition and covers a wide range of complex, underlying pathophysiologies that are not well understood. The review explores comparative effectiveness interventions for the treatment of symptomatic dyspepsia along a pragmatic-explanatory continuum. The aim is to identify relevant design characteristics applicable to future upper gastrointestinal comparative effectiveness research employing integrative medicine.

Methods

Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and WHO Clinical Trials were systematically searched until January 2019. Included articles were original research with two or more comparative intervention arms for the primary outcome; relief of symptomatic dyspepsia. Evaluation of the studies was conducted using the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS-2) tool.

Results

Thirty-six articles were included in the review. A total of 68 Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs), utilizing 50 different formats were deployed across the studies. The appraisal process revealed eligibility, flexibility in adherence, flexibility in delivery and organization domains further aligned towards an explanatory design.

Conclusion

This review identified three design characteristics relevant for future comparative effectiveness research for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders in a community setting. Extensive exclusion eligibility criteria limited the generalization of comparative effectiveness study results by removing sub-groups of the target populations more at risk of dyspeptic symptoms. The requirement for entry endoscopy was found to be common and not always pragmatically justifiable. Development of validated PROMs appropriate for a generic application to upper gastrointestinal disorders would be advantageous for future comparative effectiveness research within integrative medicine.

Pharmacologic treatment of GERD: Where we are now, and where are we going?

The introduction of acid inhibition in clinical practice has revolutionized the management of acid-related diseases, leading to the virtual abolition of elective surgery for ulcer disease and relegating antireflux surgery to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) not adequately managed by medical therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the antisecretory drugs of choice for the treatment of reflux disease. However, these drugs still leave some unmet clinical needs in GERD. PPI-refractoriness is common, and persistent symptoms are observed in up to 40-55% of daily PPI users. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) clearly overcome many of the drawbacks and limitations of PPIs, achieving rapid, potent, and prolonged acid suppression, offering the opportunity to address many of the unmet needs. In recent years, it has been increasingly recognized that impaired mucosal integrity is involved in the pathogenesis of GERD. As a consequence, esophageal mucosal protection has emerged as a new, promising therapeutic avenue. When P-CABS are used as add-on medications to standard treatment, a growing body of evidence suggests a significant additional benefit, especially in the relief of symptoms not responding to PPI therapy. On the contrary, reflux inhibitors are considered a promise unfulfilled, and prokinetic agents should only be used on a case-by-case basis.

Current knowledge on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small-bowel damage: a comprehensive review

Recent advances in small-bowel endoscopy such as capsule endoscopy have shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) frequently damage the small intestine, with the prevalence rate of mucosal breaks of around 50% in chronic users. A significant proportion of patients with NSAIDs-induced enteropathy are asymptomatic, but some patients develop symptomatic or complicated ulcers that need therapeutic intervention. Both inhibition of prostaglandins due to the inhibition of cyclooxygenases and mitochondrial dysfunction secondary to the topical effect of NSAIDs play a crucial role in the early process of injury. As a result, the intestinal barrier function is impaired, which allows enterobacteria to invade the mucosa. Gram-negative bacteria and endogenous molecules coordinate to trigger inflammatory cascades via Toll-like receptor 4 to induce excessive expression of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α and to activate NLRP3 inflammasome, a multiprotein complex that processes pro-interleukin-1β into its mature form. Finally, neutrophils accumulate in the mucosa, resulting in intestinal ulceration. Currently, misoprostol is the only drug that has a proven beneficial effect on bleeding small intestinal ulcers induced by NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin, but its protection is insufficient. Therefore, the efficacy of the combination of misoprostol with other drugs, especially those targeting the innate immune system, should be assessed in the next step.

Cost-utility analysis of a 'vonoprazan-first' strategy versus 'esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-first' strategy in GERD

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be treated using a vonoprazan-first strategy (first-line treatment with vonoprazan), or esomeprazole-first/rabeprazole-first strategies (first-line treatment with proton-pump inhibitors [PPIs], esomeprazole/rabeprazole, followed by a switch to vonoprazan). This cost-utility analysis used long-term simulation modeling to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a vonoprazan-first strategy compared with the esomeprazole-first and rabeprazole-first strategies.

METHODS

A Markov simulation model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan-first, esomeprazole-first, and rabeprazole-first strategies, comprising healing and maintenance therapies, over 5 years (4-week cycles). Healing therapy began with the administration of a normal dose of drug per real-world practice. If patients were not healed endoscopically, either a longer duration of healing therapy was provided (vonoprazan), the dose was increased (rabeprazole), or patients were switched to vonoprazan (immediately for esomeprazole, and after dose-escalation for rabeprazole, respectively). Healed patients received maintenance (lower/same dose as healing therapy). Recurrence resulted in re-challenge with healing therapy. Transition probabilities were derived from the results of indirect comparisons (network meta-analysis) and costs calculated from the Japanese payer perspective. Outcomes were defined as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with utilities based on published values.

RESULTS

Expected costs of the vonoprazan-, esomeprazole-, and rabeprazole-first strategies were ¥36,194, ¥76,719, and ¥41,105, respectively, over 5 years. QALY gains for vonoprazan-first strategy versus the esomeprazole- and rabeprazole-first strategies were 0.014 and 0.003, respectively. Both estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were dominant and robust to two sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Vonoprazan-first strategy increased QALYs and appeared to be cost-effective for GERD patients compared with the esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-first strategies.

Relationship between night reflux and sleep disturbance in elderly patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

The reflux symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) seriously affect the quality of life of patients. Daytime reflux is obvious, but the duration of reflux is short, which has little impact on the quality of life. Although the frequency of nocturnal regurgitation is low, its duration is long, which seriously affects the sleep quality of patients. Therefore, GERD nocturnal regurgitation has become one of clinical research hotspots and an important problem to be solved.

AIM

To observe the relationship between night reflux and sleep disturbance in elderly patients with GERD in a tertiary hospital.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty elderly patients with gastroesophageal reflux admitted to the Second Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang Province from February 2017 to August 2019 were selected as subjects for investigation of the incidence of nocturnal reflux symptoms, manifestations of sleep disorders, and the relationship between nocturnal reflux and sleep disorders.

RESULTS

Of 240 cases of GERD included, 36 (15.0%) had no nocturnal reflux and 204 (85.0%) had. In the past 1 mo, nocturnal reflux developed on average once a week or less in 34 (16.67%) of 204 patients with nocturnal reflux, twice a week in 78 (38.24%), and > 2 times in 52 (25.49%). Of 36 cases without nocturnal reflux symptoms, 9 (25.0%) had a sleep disorder, while all 204 (100.0%) cases with nocturnal reflux suffered from a sleep disorder. The incidence of sleep disorder was significantly higher in patients with nocturnal reflux than in those without (P < 0.05). Approximately 77.94% of the patients had decreased sleep quality. Daytime residual effect was found in 70.10% of patients. Sleep latency was prolonged in 55.88% of patients. When the latency was prolonged, the time to sleep was mainly 30-40 min. The total sleep time was shortened in 53.92% of patients, most of whom had a sleep time of 4-5 h. Among the 204 GERD patients, 106 (51.96%) needed drug therapy for nocturnal reflux, including 36 (33.96%) patients taking rabeprazole orally, 20 (18.87%) taking omeprazole orally, 30 (28.30%) taking cimetidine orally, and 20 (18.87%) taking sleeping pills orally, with an effective rate of 96.23% (102/106).

CONCLUSION

Nocturnal reflux may be one of the reasons affecting sleep disorders in elderly GERD patients. Proton pump inhibitor therapy can be administered in clinical practice.

A comparison between dexlansoprazole modified release-based and lansoprazole-based nonbismuth quadruple (concomitant) therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a prospective randomized trial

Purpose

Steadily maintaining high intra-gastric PH is the major factor for successful Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) eradication. It is important to search for a stronger PPI. Dexlansoprazole MR is a dual delayed release formulation PPI taken once daily which is capable of maintaining longer duration of high intra-gastric PH. It is very effective in treating gastroesophageal disease but reports on H, pylori eradication is very rare. This study sought to compare dexlansoprazole MR-based concomitant treatment and lansoprazole-based concomitant treatment in H. pylori infection and to investigate the factors that affect the eradication rates.

Methods

Two hundred two participants with H. pylori infection were included and randomly assigned to seven days of dexlansoprazole MR-based concomitant therapy (dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg once daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily; DACM group) or a seven days of lansoprazole-based concomitant therapy (lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily; LACM group). The participants were asked to perform urea breath tests eight weeks later.

Results

The eradication rates in the DACM group were 86.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 77.8%–92.2%] in the ITT analysis and 90.6% (95% CI: 82.9%–95.6%) in the PP analysis, respectively, as compared with 90.1% (95% CI: 82.6%–95.2%) and 92.6% (95% CI: 85.5%–96.9%) (p=0.384 and p=0.572, respectively) in the LACM group for the same analyses. The adverse event rates were 11.5% in the DACM group and 10.2% in the LACM group (p=0.779).

Conclusion

As a first-line H. pylori treatment regimen, dexlansoprazole MR-based concomitant therapy attained a successful eradication rate of 90%, which was non inferior to that of lansoprazole-based concomitant treatment.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT03829150.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/AJ1z88nc4uI

The potential role of potassium-competitive acid blockers in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is primarily a motor disorder, but its pathogenesis is multifactorial. Although gastric acid secretion is usually normal in GERD patients, treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has become the standard of care, despite increasing awareness of their shortcomings. In this article, a new class of antisecretory drugs (namely potassium-competitive acid blockers, P-CABs), developed to overcome these limitations, is discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

P-CABs block the K exchange channel of the proton pump, resulting in rapid, competitive, reversible inhibition of acid secretion. These drugs offer a more rapid elevation of intragastric pH than PPIs, while maintaining similar antisecretory effect, the duration of which is dependent on half-life and can be prolonged with extended release formulations. Thus, P-CABs offer advances in the treatment of GERD including rapid heartburn relief, faster and more reliable healing of severe grades of erosive esophagitis, as a consequence of better control of nighttime acid secretion than PPIs.

SUMMARY

P-CABs overcome many of the drawbacks of PPIs. The unique antisecretory effects of vonoprazan might be especially useful in the long-term treatment of patients with Barrett's esophagus.