Comparison of hypersensitivity reactions of intravenous iron: iron isomaltoside-1000 (Monofer® ) versus ferric carboxy-maltose (Ferinject® ). A single center, cohort study

Intravenous iron: an update

Iron deficiency is the most common nutritional deficiency worldwide, with significant adverse health consequences in the presence or absence of anaemia. Total dose intravenous iron replacement is recommended for replacement of iron in patients with severe iron deficiency, especially in the presence of anaemia, intolerance or inefficacy following oral iron, or states of inflammation where upregulation of hepcidin may impair gastrointestinal absorption of iron. Currently, available intravenous iron formulations have been demonstrated to have an excellent overall safety profile, but potential adverse effects, including skin staining, infusion-related reactions and hypophosphataemia, have been described. Knowledge of differences in administration and safety profiles of currently available iron formulations will allow appropriate prescription, counselling, as well as recognition and management of adverse events in patients requiring intravenous iron.

Administration of intravenous iron through a home-based infusion strategy is safe and has high patient acceptance

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To evaluate the safety and patient experience of a hospital-initiated home-based iron infusion service in patients with iron deficiency with or without anaemia.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study, including adult patients who received intravenous iron through a Hospital in The Home service in a single tertiary centre between August 2020 and 2021. A chart review was conducted for documented adverse events (AEs). A telephone survey assessed patient acceptance with three questions on a 5-point Likert scale: (i) How do you perceive the experience of having your infusion given in the home? (ii) Would you like to have the infusion in the same location if you require one in the future? and (iii) Do you feel safe having your infusion at home?

OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of patients experiencing AEs and patient acceptance of a home-based iron infusion strategy.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-seven patients were included (181 ferric carboxymaltose and 16 ferric derisomaltose). Six (3%) patients (2 of 181 patients who received ferric carboxymaltose compared with 4 of 16 patients who received ferric derisomaltose, P < 0.001, Fisher's exact) experienced AEs, mostly headache and pruritus. Most patients who participated in the telephone survey had a positive experience (57/58 (98%)), felt safe (57/58 (98%)) and preferred future infusions to occur at home (52/58 (90%)).

CONCLUSION

A home-based iron infusion strategy was safe and well accepted by patients. Larger studies evaluating the safety profile of different iron formulations in the home setting are required.

Current concepts in preoperative anemia management in obstetrics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of currently recommended treatment approaches for anemia during pregnancy, with a special focus on iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia (IDA).

RECENT FINDINGS

As consistent patient blood management (PBM) guidelines in obstetrics are still lacking, recommendations regarding the timing of anemia screening and the treatment recommendations for iron deficiency and IDA during pregnancy are still controversial. Based on increasing evidence, early screening for anemia and iron deficiency should be recommended at the beginning of each pregnancy. To reduce maternal and fetal burden, any iron deficiency, even without anemia, should be treated as early as possible during pregnancy. While oral iron supplements administered every other day are the standard treatment in the first trimester, the use of intravenous iron supplements is increasingly suggested from the second trimester onwards.

SUMMARY

The treatment of anemia, and more specifically iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy, holds many possibilities for improvement. The fact that the period of risk is known well in advance and thus there is a long optimization phase is per se an ideal prerequisite for the best possible therapy of treatable causes of anemia. Standardization of recommendations and guidelines for screening and treatment of IDA in obstetrics is required for the future. In any case, a multidisciplinary consent is the precondition for a successfully implementation of anemia management in obstetrics to establish an approved algorithm easily enabling detection and treatment of IDA during pregnancy.

Clinical and economic impact of ferric carboxymaltose treatment for iron deficiency in patients stabilized following acute heart failure: a multinational study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate clinical events and evaluate the financial implications of introducing ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) to treat iron deficiency (ID) at discharge in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% in the UK, Switzerland and Italy.

METHODS

A decision analytic cost-offset model was developed to evaluate the costs associated with introducing FCM for all eligible patients in three countries compared to a world without FCM, over a five-year time horizon. Data from AFFIRM-AHF clinical trial were used to model clinical outcomes, using an established cohort state-transition Markov model. Country-specific prevalence estimates were derived using data from real-world studies to extrapolate number of events and consequent cost totals to the population at risk on a national scale.

RESULTS

The cost-offset modeling demonstrated that FCM is projected to be a cost-saving intervention in all three country settings over a five-year time horizon. Savings were driven primarily by reduced hospitalizations and avoided cardiovascular deaths, with net cost savings of -£14,008,238, -CHF25,456,455 and -€105,295,146 incurred to the UK, Switzerland and Italy, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Although AFFIRM-AHF was a multinational trial, efficacy data per country was not sufficiently large to enable country-specific analysis, therefore overall clinical parameters have been assumed to apply to all countries.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides further evidence of the potential cost savings achievable by treating ID with FCM at discharge in patients hospitalized for AHF with LVEF <50%. The value of FCM treatment within the healthcare systems of the UK, Switzerland and Italy was demonstrated even within a limited time frame of one year, with consistent cost savings indicated over a longer term.

Evaluation of Minimal Optimal Dose of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia and Risk of Transient Hyperferritinemia

BACKGROUND

Iron supplementation is administered orally or intravenously to treat iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) "Ferinject®" is an intravenous (IV) iron preparation that has emerged as a safe therapeutic option for treating IDA in the past decade.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of carboxymaltose in a cohort of patients with IDA not responding to oral therapy.

METHODS

This 12-month retrospective study included 106 patients with IDA, with-or without bariatric surgery, who received (single or multiple doses) of Carboxymaltose 500mg/10mL. Data points included patients' demographics, baseline data for Hb, platelet, ferritin, and MCV pre-and at 1, 2, and 3 months following different doses of IV-Carboxymaltose. Changes in Hb, MCV, platelets, and ferritin levels were recorded in response to Carboxymaltose to assess the optimal dose, risk of hyperferritinemia, and hypophosphatemia.

RESULTS

At three months (95 days) follow-up, the median change pre-and post-therapy in hemoglobin was from 9.5 to 11.9g/dL (p < 0.01), MCV 73.6-80.5fL (p < 0.01), and ferritin 5.3-93.8ng/mL. A significant difference was observed between platelet count of patients who underwent bariatric surgery and those who did not. An optimal ferritin response (>30ng/mL) was observed in 87.8% of patients who received first dose, and none of the full three doses showed no response. 37% of patients who received two doses developed hyperferritinemia. Serum phosphate levels were assessed in 28 cases, and hypophosphatemia was observed in 25% of these patients.

CONCLUSION

Carboxymaltose is a reliable option for IDA. IV-FCM therapy helps achieve significant improvement in hemoglobin concentration and MCV from the first dose carrying a low reversible risk of hyperferritinemia following multiple doses. An interesting finding of this study is the discovery of a population of IDA patients requiring periodic assessment for iron reinfusion to sustain normal levels, mostly post-bariatric surgery. Changes in serum phosphate levels reported to occur consecutively with FCM treatment should be further studied.

Association of iron infusion reactions with ABO blood type

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine risk factors for iv iron infusion-related reactions (IRR), and identify strategies for iron repletion after IRR.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated in the classical hematology clinic at Yale Cancer Center (n = 330 consecutive patients) from 2016 to 2021, who received iv ferumoxytol (60.3%), iron sucrose (14.8%), or iron dextran (10.9%).

RESULTS

The iv iron IRR was noted in 58 (17.6%) patients, 62.1% of whom had previously tolerated iv iron. The severity of IRR was mild in 22, moderate in 23, and severe in 11 patients. Most (72.4%) patients who experienced IRR tolerated a subsequent iv iron infusion. On multivariable analysis, a history of non-medication allergies was associated with greater odds of IRR (odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-3.87, p = .01). No patients with type AB blood, and few with type A blood (n = 6), had IRR; compared to type A or AB together, patients with type B (OR 5.00, 95% CI: 1.56-16.06, p = .007) or type O (OR 3.71, 95% CI: 1.44-9.55, p = .007) blood had greater odds of IRR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights a possible association of blood type with iv iron IRR; prospective studies with larger patient numbers are warranted to explore this association.

Safety and efficacy of a single total dose infusion (1020 mg) of ferumoxytol

Purpose:

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common type of anemia. A single dose infusion of intravenous (IV) iron is a convenient treatment option. Ferumoxytol is an IV formulation of iron that is typically given in two doses of 510 mg each. Utilizing a single dose of 1020 mg over 15 min has previously been described as safe and effective. In July 2018, we began to administer a single 1020 mg dose of ferumoxytol to patients needing IV iron replacement at the North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System. To evaluate the impact of this change, a utilization review was conducted.

Methods:

Outcomes of all patients who received ferumoxytol injections in the 6 months prior to and after the dosing strategy change were analyzed. A total of 140 patients, who received 270 separate IV ferumoxytol infusions, were included in the analysis.

Results:

No significant difference in safety was observed, with one infusion reaction occurring in each group (p = 1.00). Efficacy also appeared equivalent with no significant difference between the change in hemoglobin for those who received a single 1020 mg dose versus those who received two 510 mg doses (p = 0.764). As expected, those who received a single total dose infusion of 1020 mg had less clinic utilization (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

In summary, ferumoxytol administered as a 1020 mg single dose infusion was more convenient and should be considered a safe and effective treatment option for IDA.

Oral iron supplementation with ferric maltol in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Iron deficiency is common in patients with pulmonary hypertension [1, 2]. The underlying pathomechanisms are complex and include impaired iron absorption, elevated hepcidin levels, augmented gastrointestinal loss and reduced availability from the reticuloendothelial system [1, 3, 4]. In patients with pulmonary hypertension, iron deficiency is associated with aggravated symptoms and an increased mortality risk [3, 5].

Oral ferric maltol was well tolerated and effective in patients with pulmonary hypertension and iron deficiency anaemia. Restoration of iron stores corrected anaemia and resulted in improved right ventricular function and exercise tolerancehttps://bit.ly/2zMwvxc

Reported Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions after Intravenous Iron Administration in the European Economic Area (EEA) Before and After Implementation of Risk Minimization Measures

INTRODUCTION

Severe hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) such as anaphylaxis are of great clinical concern because of their life-threatening potential. The adverse events attributable to intravenous iron products include HSRs. An investigation by the European Medicines Agency presented in late 2013 resulted in the implementation of risk minimization measures (RMMs).

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the number of severe HSRs reported for intravenous iron substances related to exposure for the 4-year periods before and after this implementation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective pharmacoepidemiologic study with a case-population design. We obtained information from the safety surveillance database EudraVigilance on spontaneously reported severe HSRs using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms "anaphylactic reaction/shock" and "anaphylactoid reaction/shock". Exposure was estimated using IQVIA MIDAS sales data in European economic area countries.

RESULTS

Reporting rates for individual products were heterogenous, and the implementation of RMMs appeared to have no clear impact. Reporting rates remained low for the full study period for iron sucrose (0.03-0.20) and ferric gluconate (0.02-0.14) and were higher at the beginning and lower at the end of the study period for ferric carboxymaltose (1.47-0.18). No clear trend was detected for iron dextran (range 0.22-2.80) and iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 (range 0-7.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Future research is needed to investigate whether the wide variability in reporting rates for severe HSRs associated with these intravenous iron products are due to potential differences in the safety profiles of these substances.

Evaluation of the reported rates of hypersensitivity reactions associated with iron dextran and ferric carboxymaltose based on global data from VigiBase™ and IQVIA™ MIDAS® over a ten-year period from 2008 to 2017

Objectives: It is hypothesized that the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) may be lower with ferric carboxymaltose than iron dextran because of its non-dextran carbohydrate moiety. This study compares the risk of HSRs between iron dextran and ferric carboxymaltose.Methods: This was a retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study with a case-population design covering 2008-2017. Global exposure data were estimated using IQVIA™ sales data. Spontaneously reported HSR data were retrieved from the World Health Organization database (VigiBase™) using different search criteria including: the Standardized MedDRA® Query (SMQ) 'Anaphylactic reaction'; type I-IV HSR terms; narrow terms for anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions; and cases with a fatal outcome.Results: Total exposure in 100 mg doses was 117.3 million for iron dextran and 84.2 million for ferric carboxymaltose. The relative risk (with 95% confidence interval) for ferric carboxymaltose versus iron dextran was 4.18 (3.88-4.50) for SMQ Anaphylactic reaction; 12.9 (9.90-16.7) for type I-IV HSRs; 1.72 (1.45-2.04) for anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions; and 1.92 (1.24-2.99) for death.Conclusion: The risk of spontaneously reported HSRs was consistently higher with ferric carboxy-maltose than with iron dextran over the period 2008-2017. Thus, this study does not support that dextran-free intravenous irons are associated with fewer HSRs than iron dextran.

Evaluation of the Reported Rates of Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions Associated with Ferric Carboxymaltose and Iron (III) Isomaltoside 1000 in Europe Based on Data from EudraVigilance and VigiBase™ between 2014 and 2017

Introduction

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are among the known adverse events of intravenous (i.v.) iron products. Of these, particularly severe HSRs such as anaphylaxis are of great clinical concern due to their life-threatening potential.

Methods

This was a retrospective pharmacoepidemiological study with a case-population design evaluating the number of reported severe HSRs following administration of the two i.v. iron products—ferric carboxymaltose and iron (III) isomaltoside 1000—in relation to exposure in European countries from January 2014 to December 2017. Exposure to both products was estimated using IQVIA MIDAS sales data in European countries. Information on spontaneously reported severe HSRs was obtained from and analysed separately for the two established safety surveillance databases EudraVigilance and VigiBase™ using the MedDRA^® Preferred Terms anaphylactic reaction, anaphylactic shock, anaphylactoid reaction and anaphylactoid shock associated with administration of either product.

Results

Between 2014 and 2017, the reporting rate of severe HSRs per 100,000 defined daily doses (100 mg dose equivalents of iron) varied from 0.3 to 0.5 for ferric carboxymaltose and from 2.4 to 5.0 for iron (III) isomaltoside 1000. The reporting rate ratio for iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 versus ferric carboxymaltose was between 5.6 (95% CI 3.5–9.0) and 16.2 (95% CI 9.4–27.8).

Conclusions

Findings suggest that iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 is associated with a higher reporting rate of severe HSRs related to estimated exposure than ferric carboxymaltose in European countries. Future research investigating the occurrence of severe HSRs associated with i.v. ferric carboxymaltose and iron (III) isomaltoside 1000 is needed to broaden the evidence for benefit-risk assessment.

Iron III isomaltose induced hypersensitivity reaction

Iron isomaltose is considered as safe form of iron with no test dose recommended. Here, we are describing the case of a patient who experienced allergic reaction with this formulation of iron. A 35-year-old South Asian woman experienced allergic reaction, she had mild wheeze on examination of chest. She was given intranasal oxygen at 2 L/min. She was given intravenous acetaminophen 1 g for pain relief, 45.4 mg intravenous chlorphenaramine and intravenous 100 mg hydrocortisone. Within half an hour, all her symptoms improved and her hypoxia resolved. Her chest wheezing also disappeared. Iron isomaltose, although relatively safe, can cause allergic reaction. Intravenous iron can cause allergic reaction therefore it should be administered at the facility where trained staff is present so that necessary treatment can be given in case of hypersensitivity reaction.

Comparison of hypersensitivity reactions of intravenous iron: iron isomaltoside-1000 (Monofer® ) versus ferric carboxy-maltose (Ferinject® ). A single center, cohort study

AIMS

Intravenous iron supplementation is widely used to treat iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia when oral iron administration is ineffective or poorly tolerated. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) during infusions are rare, but can be life-threatening. This study aimed to compare the risk for HSRs with the intravenous administration of iron isomaltoside-1000 and ferric carboxymaltose for the treatment of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia.

METHODS

This was a single-centre cohort study. Nurses and physicians were instructed to fill out an HSR registration form with every administration of intravenous iron. HSRs were distinguished into serious and non-serious HSRs using the Ring and Messmer classification.

RESULTS

HSRs occurred in 18/836 (2.1%) ferric carboxymaltose and 43/496 (8.7%) iron isomaltoside-1000 administrations. The crude risk for HSRs was 75% lower after ferric carboxymaltose treatment (RR = 0.248, 95% CI: 0.145-0.426, P < 0.0001). The risk for grade II HSRs was 88% lower after ferric carboxymaltoside (RR = 0.123, 95% CI: 0.051-0.294). The likelihood of HSRs was 3.4 times higher after the administration of iron isomaltoside-1000 (95% CI: 1.910-6.093, P < 0.0001). Regardless of the type of intravenous iron, patients with comorbidities have a factor 3.6 higher risk (95% CI: 1.899-6.739, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ferric carboxymaltose is associated with a 75% lower risk for HSRs compared with iron isomaltoside-1000 in our population. The presence of a comorbidity raises the likelihood of an HSR by a factor of three regardless of the type of intravenous iron infusion. Further research is needed to clarify the underlying mechanism in various patient groups.