Imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib: From flat-fixed dosing towards a pharmacokinetically guided personalized dose

Sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the effect of TDM-guided dose optimization on clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib is an oral anticancer drug approved for the treatment of among others gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Previous analyses demonstrated an exposure-response relationship at the standard dose, and minimum target levels of drug exposure have been defined above which better treatment outcomes are observed. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could be used as a tool to optimize the individual dose, aiming at sunitinib trough concentrations ≥37.5 ng/ml for continuous dosing. Nonetheless, data on the added value of TDM-guided dosing on clinical endpoints are currently lacking. Therefore, we evaluate the effect of TDM in patients with advanced and metastatic GIST treated with sunitinib in terms of efficacy and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A TDM-guided cohort was compared to a non-TDM-guided cohort in terms of median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). Also, mPFS between patients with and without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) was compared. Patients in the prospective cohort were included in two studies on TDM-guided dosing (the DPOG-TDM study and TUNE study). The retrospective cohort consisted of patients from the Dutch GIST Registry who did not receive TDM-guided dosing.

RESULTS

In total, 51 and 106 patients were included in the TDM-guided cohort and non-TDM-guided cohort, respectively. No statistical difference in mPFS was observed between these two cohorts (39.4 versus 46.9 weeks, respectively; P = 0.52). Patients who experienced sunitinib-induced DLTs had longer mPFS compared to those who did not (51.9 versus 28.9 weeks, respectively; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support the routine use of TDM-guided dose optimization of sunitinib in patients with advanced/metastatic GIST to improve survival.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in anticancer agents: perspectives of Australian medical oncologists

BACKGROUND

In the development of anticancer agents for solid tumours, body surface area continues to be used to personalise dosing despite minimal evidence for its use over other dosing strategies. With the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other oral targeted anticancer agents, dosing using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is now utilised in many health systems but has had limited uptake in Australia.

AIM

To determine attitudes and barriers to the implementation of TDM among Australian oncologists.

METHODS

A comprehensive questionnaire was developed by the Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group from semistructured interviews of stakeholders. Seventy-nine questions across seven domains were developed with three free-text responses. This was rationalised to 17 questions with three free-text responses for Australian medical oncologists who identified limited experience with TDM.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven responses were received, with 49 clinicians (86%) identifying limited experience of performing TDM in daily practice. Clinicians were positive (62-91% agree/strongly agree across seven questions) about the advantages of TDM. There was a mixed response for cost-effectiveness and scientific evidence being a barrier to implementation, but strong agreement that prospective studies were needed (75% agreed or strongly agreed); that national treatment guidelines would enable practice (80%) and that a 'pharmacology of oncolytics' education programme would be useful (96%) to provide knowledge for dose individualisation.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limited experience of TDM in oncology in Australia, medical oncologists appear positive about the potential benefit to their patients. We have identified three barriers to implementation that could be targeted for increased adoption of TDM in oncology in Australia.

Preliminary Investigation of a Rapid and Feasible Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Method for the Real-Time Estimation of Blood Pazopanib Concentrations

Pazopanib is a multi-kinase inhibitor used to treat advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma and advanced soft tissue tumors; however, side effects such as diarrhea and hypertension have been reported, and dosage adjustment based on drug concentration in the blood is necessary. However, measuring pazopanib concentrations in blood using the existing methods is time-consuming; and current dosage adjustments are made using the results of blood samples taken at the patient's previous hospital visit (approximately a month prior). If the concentration of pazopanib could be measured during the waiting period for a doctor's examination at the hospital (in approximately 30 min), the dosage could be adjusted according to the patient's condition on that day. Therefore, we aimed to develop a method for rapidly measuring blood pazopanib concentrations (in approximately 25 min) using common analytical devices (a tabletop centrifuge and a spectrometer). This method allowed for pazopanib quantification in the therapeutic concentration range (25-50 μg/mL). Additionally, eight popular concomitant medications taken simultaneously with pazopanib did not interfere with the measurements. We used the developed method to measure blood concentration in two patients and obtained similar results to those measured using the previously reported HPLC method. By integrating it with the point of care and sample collection by finger pick, this method can be used for measurements in pharmacies and patients' homes. This method can maximize the therapeutic effects of pazopanib by dose adjustment to control adverse events.

Phenotype versus genotype to optimize cancer dosing in the clinical setting-focus on 5-fluorouracil and tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Cancer medicines often have narrow therapeutic windows; toxicity can be severe and sometimes fatal, but inadequate dose intensity reduces efficacy and survival. Determining the optimal dose for each patient is difficult, with body-surface area used most commonly for chemotherapy and flat dosing for tyrosine kinase inhibitors, despite accumulating evidence of a wide range of exposures in individual patients with many receiving a suboptimal dose with these strategies. Therapeutic drug monitoring (measuring the drug concentration in a biological fluid, usually plasma) (TDM) is an accepted and well validated method to guide dose adjustments for individual patients to improve this. However, implementing TDM in routine care has been difficult outside a research context. The development of genotyping of various proteins involved in drug elimination and activity has gained prominence, with several but not all Guideline groups recommending dose reductions for particular variant genotypes. However, there is increasing concern that dosing recommendations are based on limited data sets and may lead to unnecessary underdosing and increased cancer mortality. This Review discusses the evidence surrounding genotyping and TDM to guide decisions around best practice.

A Score to Predict the Clinical Usefulness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Application to Oral Molecular Targeted Therapies in Cancer

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) involves measuring and interpreting drug concentrations in biological fluids to adjust drug dosages. In onco-hematology, TDM guidelines for oral molecular targeted therapies (oMTTs) are varied. This study evaluates a quantitative approach with a score to predict the clinical usefulness of TDM for oMTTs. We identified key parameters for an oMTT's suitability for TDM from standard TDM recommendations. We gathered oMTT pharmacological data, which covered exposure variability (considering pharmacokinetic (PK) impact of food and proton pump inhibitors), technical intricacy (PK linearity and active metabolites), efficacy (exposure-response relationship), and safety (maximum tolerated dose, and exposure-safety relationship). To assess the validity and the relevance of the score and define relevant thresholds, we evaluated molecules with prospective validation or strong recommendations for TDM, both in oncology and in other fields. By September 1, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 67 oMTTs for onco-hematological indications. Scores ranged from 15 (acalabrutinib) to 80 (sunitinib) with an average of 48.3 and a standard deviation of 15.6. Top scorers included sunitinib, sorafenib, cabozantinib, nilotinib, and abemaciclib. Based on scores, drugs were categorized into low (< 40), intermediate (≥ 40 and < 60), and high (≥ 60) relevance for TDM. Notably, negative controls generally scored around or under 40, whereas positive controls had a high score across different indications. In this work, we propose a quantitative and reproducible score to compare the potential usefulness of TDM for oMTTs. Future guidelines should prioritize the TDM for molecules with the highest score.

An Optimized LC-MS/MS Method for Quantification of Sunitinib and N -Desethyl Sunitinib in Human Plasma and Its Application for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib (SUN) malate is an oral, multitargeted, tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. SUN has a narrow therapeutic window and high variability in interpatient pharmacokinetic parameters. Clinical detection methods for SUN and N -desethyl SUN limit the application of SUN to therapeutic drug monitoring. All published methods for quantifying SUN in human plasma require strict light protection to avoid light-induced isomerism or the use of additional quantitative software. To avoid these difficult processes in clinical routines, the authors propose a novel method that merges the peaks of the E -isomer and Z -isomer of SUN or N -desethyl SUN into a single peak.

METHODS

The E -isomer and Z -isomer peaks of SUN or N -desethyl SUN were merged into a single peak by optimizing the mobile phases to decrease the resolution of the isomers. A suitable chromatographic column was selected to obtain a good peak shape. Thereafter, the conventional and single-peak methods (SPM) were simultaneously validated and compared according to the guidelines published by the Food and Drug Administration in 2018 and the Chinese Pharmacopoeia in 2020.

RESULTS

The verification results showed that the SPM was superior to the conventional method in the matrix effect and met the requirements for biological sample analysis. SPM was then applied to detect the total steady-state concentration of SUN and N -desethyl SUN in tumor patients who received SUN malate.

CONCLUSIONS

The established SPM makes the detection of SUN and N -desethyl SUN easier and faster without light protection or extra quantitative software, making it more appropriate for routine clinical use. The clinical application results showed that 12 patients took 37.5 mg per day, with a median total trough steady-state concentration of 75.0 ng/mL.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in India: A strength, weakness, opportunity and threats analysis

Over the last three to four decades, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) has shaped itself as therapeutic drug management, an integral component of precision medicine. The practice of TDM is not extensive in India, despite being one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. It is currently limited to a few academic medical centres and teaching hospitals. Apart from the immunosuppressive drugs, several other therapeutic areas, such as anticancer, antifungal, antibiotic and antitubercular, have demonstrated great potential to improve patient outcomes in Indian settings. Factors such as the higher prevalence of nutritional deficiencies, tropical diseases, widespread use of alternative medicines, unalike pharmacogenomics and sparse population-specific data available on therapeutic ranges of several drugs make the population of this subcontinent unique regarding the relevance of TDM. Despite the impact of TDM in clinical science and its widespread application, TDM has failed to receive the attention it deserves in India. This review intends to bring out a strength, weakness, opportunity and threats (SWOT) analysis for TDM in India so that appropriate steps for fostering the growth of TDM could be envisioned. The need of the hour is the creation of a cooperative group including all the stakeholders, such as TDM professionals, clinicians and the government and devising a National Action Plan to strengthen TDM. Nodal TDM centres should be established, and pilot programmes should be rolled out to identify the thrust areas for TDM in the country, capacity building and creating awareness to integrate TDM into mainstream clinical medicine.

Therapeutic drug monitoring to personalize dosing of imatinib, sunitinib, and pazopanib: A mixed methods study on barriers and facilitators

BACKGROUND

Personalized dosing based on measurement of individual drug levels and adjusting the dose accordingly can improve efficacy and decrease unnecessary toxicity of oncological treatment. For imatinib, sunitinib, and pazopanib, this therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing is, however, not routinely used, despite accumulating evidence favoring individualized dosing. Therefore, we aimed to identify and quantify (potential) barriers and facilitators in TDM-guided dosing for imatinib, sunitinib, and pazopanib.

METHODS

We performed a mixed methods study among all stakeholders involved: patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs), pharmaceutical companies, and health insurance companies. During the first qualitative part of this study, we performed semi-structured individual interviews and one focus group interview to identify all (potential) barriers and facilitators, and during the second quantitative part of this study, we used a web-based survey to quantify these findings. The interviews addressed the six domains of the implementation of change model of Grol and Wensing: (1) the innovation itself; (2) the HCP; (3) the patient; (4) social context; (5) organizational context; and (6) finances, law, and governance.

RESULTS

In the qualitative study, we interviewed 20 patients, 18 HCPs and 10 representatives of pharmaceutical and health insurance companies and identified 72 barriers and 90 facilitators. In the quantitative study, the survey was responded by 66 HCPs and 58 patients. Important barriers were on the domain of the HCP, such as a lack of experience with TDM (36.4%), on the domain of the patient, such as lack of awareness of TDM (39.7%), and the processing time for measurement and interpretation of the TDM result (40.9%) (organizational domain). Important facilitators were education of HCPs (95.5%), education of patients (87.9%) and facilitating an overview of when and where TDM measurements are being performed (86.4%).

CONCLUSION

We identified and quantified important barriers and facilitators for the implementation of TDM-guided dosing for imatinib, sunitinib, and pazopanib. Based on our results, the implementation strategy should mainly focus on educating both HCPs and patients and on the organizational aspect of TDM.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Kinase Inhibitors in Oncology

Although kinase inhibitors (KI) frequently portray large interpatient variability, a 'one size fits all' regimen is still often used. In the meantime, relationships between exposure-response and exposure-toxicity have been established for several KIs, so this regimen could lead to unnecessary toxicity and suboptimal efficacy. Dose adjustments based on measured systemic pharmacokinetic levels-i.e., therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-could therefore improve treatment efficacy and reduce the incidence of toxicities. Therefore, the aim of this comprehensive review is to give an overview of the available evidence for TDM for the 77 FDA/EMA kinase inhibitors currently approved (as of July 1st, 2023) used in hematology and oncology. We elaborate on exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationships for these kinase inhibitors and provide practical recommendations for TDM and discuss corresponding pharmacokinetic targets when possible.

Novel Approaches to Characterize Individual Drug Metabolism and Advance Precision Medicine

Interindividual variability in drug metabolism can significantly affect drug concentrations in the body and subsequent drug response. Understanding an individual's drug metabolism capacity is important for predicting drug exposure and developing precision medicine strategies. The goal of precision medicine is to individualize drug treatment for patients to maximize efficacy and minimize drug toxicity. While advances in pharmacogenomics have improved our understanding of how genetic variations in drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) affect drug response, nongenetic factors are also known to influence drug metabolism phenotypes. This minireview discusses approaches beyond pharmacogenetic testing to phenotype DMEs-particularly the cytochrome P450 enzymes-in clinical settings. Several phenotyping approaches have been proposed: traditional approaches include phenotyping with exogenous probe substrates and the use of endogenous biomarkers; newer approaches include evaluating circulating noncoding RNAs and liquid biopsy-derived markers relevant to DME expression and function. The goals of this minireview are to 1) provide a high-level overview of traditional and novel approaches to phenotype individual drug metabolism capacity, 2) describe how these approaches are being applied or can be applied to pharmacokinetic studies, and 3) discuss perspectives on future opportunities to advance precision medicine in diverse populations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This minireview provides an overview of recent advances in approaches to characterize individual drug metabolism phenotypes in clinical settings. It highlights the integration of existing pharmacokinetic biomarkers with novel approaches; also discussed are current challenges and existing knowledge gaps. The article concludes with perspectives on the future deployment of a liquid biopsy-informed physiologically based pharmacokinetic strategy for patient characterization and precision dosing.

Framework for Implementing Individualised Dosing of Anti-Cancer Drugs in Routine Care: Overcoming the Logistical Challenges

Precision medicine in oncology involves identifying the 'right drug', at the 'right dose', for the right person. Currently, many orally administered anti-cancer drugs, particularly kinase inhibitors (KIs), are prescribed at a standard fixed dose. Identifying the right dose remains one of the biggest challenges to optimal patient care. Recently the Precision Dosing Group established the Accurate Dosing of Anti-cancer Patient-centred Therapies (ADAPT) Program to address individualised dosing; thus, use existing anti-cancer drugs more safely and efficiently. In this paper, we outline our framework, based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, with a simple 6-step process and strategies which have led to the successful implementation of the ADAPT program in South Australia. Implementation strategies in our 6-step process involve: (1) Evaluate the evidence and identify the cancer drugs: Literature review, shadowing other experts, establishing academic partnerships, adaptability/flexibility; (2) Establishment of analytical equipment for drug assays for clinical purposes: assessment for readiness, accreditation, feasibility, obtaining formal commitments, quality assurance to all stakeholders; (3) Clinical preparation and education: educational material, conducted educational meetings, involve opinion leaders, use of mass media, promote network weaving, conduct ongoing training; (4) Blood collection, sample preparation and analyses: goods received procedures, critical control points (transport time); (5) Interpret and release results with recommendations: facilitate the relay of clinical data to providers; (6) Clinical application: providing ongoing consultation, identify early adopters, identify, and prepare champions. These strategies were selected from the 73 implementation strategies outlined in the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. The ADAPT program currently provides routine plasma concentrations for patients on several orally administered drugs in South Australia and is currently in its evaluation phase soon to be published. Our newly established framework could provide great potential and opportunities to advance individualised dosing of oral anti-cancer drugs in routine clinical care.

A hybrid SERS sensing platform constructed by porous carbon/Ag nanoparticles for efficient imatinib detection in bio-environment

Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a rapid and non-destructive spectral detection technique, and has been widely implemented on trace-level molecule detection. In this work, a hybrid SERS substrate constructed by porous carbon film and silver nanoparticles (PCs/Ag NPs) was developed and then used for imatinib (IMT) detection in bio-environment. The PCs/Ag NPs was prepared by direct carbonizing the gelatin-AgNO₃ film in the air atmosphere, and an enhancement factor (EF) of 10⁶ was achieved with R6G as the Raman reporter. Hereafter, this SERS substrate was used as the label-free sensing platform to detect the IMT in the serum, and the experimental results indicate that the substrate is conducive to eliminating the interference from the complex biological molecules in the serum, and the characteristic Raman peaks belonging to IMT (10^-4 M) are accurately resolved. Furthermore, the SERS substrate was used to trace the IMT in the whole blood, the trace of ultra-low concertation of IMT is rapidly discovered without any pretreatment. Thus, this work finally suggests that the proposed sensing platform provides a rapid and reliable method for IMT detection in the bio-environment and offers a potential for its application in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Risk Factors for Palbociclib-Induced Early Developing Neutropenia in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the risk factors for palbociclib-induced grade 4 or grade 3 neutropenia (NP) requiring dose reduction or delayed treatment in patients with HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer in the first 3 cycles (early grade 3/4 NP) and whether the early developing grade 3/4 NP affects progression-free survival.

METHODS

A retrospective study using electronic medical records was conducted on patients who received palbociclib for metastatic breast cancer between January 2018 and August 2022. The early grade 3/4 NP risk factors were evaluated with univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median progression-free survival (PFS) to analyze the effect of early grade 3/4 NP on treatment.

RESULTS

Out of the 264 patients included in this study, 173 (65.6%) experienced early grade 3/4 NP. A total of four models were applied for multivariable analysis to identify early grade 3/4 NP-developing factors. Low baseline ANC, WBC, PLT, and BSA were significant risk factors for early grade 3/4 NP; baseline ANC < 3700/mm³, WBC < 6.30 × 10⁹/mm³, PLT < 230 × 10⁹/mm³, and BSA < 1.58 m² increased the risk by approximately 4.0-fold, 3.7-4.0-fold, 2.1-fold, and 2.0-fold, respectively. Early grade 3/4 NP did not affect PFS (p = 0.710), although patients with early grade 3/4 NP had more frequent dose reductions or treatment delays.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results, low baseline ANC, WBC, PLT, and BSA were associated with early grade 3/4 NP. Patients with risk factors require careful monitoring, and this study is expected to help predict NP, which may appear in early treatment.

A strategy for low-cost portable monitoring of plasma drug concentrations using a sustainable boron-doped-diamond chip

On-site monitoring of plasma drug concentrations is required for effective therapies. Recently developed handy biosensors are not yet popular owing to insufficient evaluation of accuracy on clinical samples and the necessity of complicated costly fabrication processes. Here, we approached these bottlenecks via a strategy involving engineeringly unmodified boron-doped diamond (BDD), a sustainable electrochemical material. A sensing system based on a ∼1 cm² BDD chip, when analysing rat plasma spiked with a molecular-targeting anticancer drug, pazopanib, detected clinically relevant concentrations. The response was stable in 60 sequential measurements on the same chip. In a clinical study, data obtained with a BDD chip were consistent with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry results. Finally, the portable system with a palm-sized sensor containing the chip analysed ∼40 μL of whole blood from dosed rats within ∼10 min. This approach with the 'reusable' sensor may improve point-of-monitoring systems and personalised medicine while reducing medical costs.

Dose optimization strategy of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: From clinical trials to real-life settings

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment prospects of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have changed markedly. This innovation can lengthen the long-term survival of patients suffering from CML. However, long-term exposure to TKIs is accompanied by various adverse events (AEs). The latter affect the quality of life and compliance of patients with CML, and may lead to serious disease progression (and even death). Recently, increasing numbers of patients with CML have begun to pursue a dose optimization strategy. Dose optimization may be considered at all stages of the entire treatment, which includes dose reduction and discontinuation of TKIs therapy. In general, reduction of the TKI dose is considered to be an important measure to reduce AEs and improve quality of life on the premise of maintaining molecular responses. Furthermore, discontinuation of TKIs therapy has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe for about half of patients with a stable optimal response and a longer duration of TKI treatment. This review focuses mainly on the latest research of dose optimization of imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib in CML clinical trials and real-life settings. We consider dose reduction in newly diagnosed patients, or in optimal response, or for improving AEs, either as a prelude to treatment-free remission (TFR) or as maintenance therapy in those patients unable to discontinue TKIs therapy. In addition, we also focus on discontinuation of TKIs therapy and second attempts to achieve TFR.

Personalized Dose of Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Results from a Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Purpose

Imatinib is the first-line treatment for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after surgery. However, its pharmacokinetic profile varies remarkably between individuals and has not been well characterized in postoperative Chinese patients with GIST. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model and recommend appropriate doses for different patients to achieve the target trough concentration in such a population.

Patients and Methods

A total of 110 surgically treated GIST patients were enrolled, of which 85 were applied to conduct a PPK analysis with a nonlinear mixed-effect model and 25 for external validation of the model. Demographic and biomedical covariates, as well as six single nucleotide polymorphisms were tested to explore the sources of variation in pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to establish the initial dosing regimens.

Results

A one-compartment model was established in postoperative GIST patients. The red blood cell count (RBC) and ABCG2 rs2231142 were observed to have a significant effect on the clearance of imatinib. The typical values estimated by the final model were 9.72 L/h for clearance (CL/F) and 229 L for volume of distribution (V/F). Different from the fixed dose regimen of 400 mg each day, patients carrying rs2231142 heterozygous type and with a lower level of RBC (2.9 × 10¹²/L), 300 mg imatinib daily is enough to achieve the target trough concentration. When RBC rises to 4.9 × 10¹²/L, 500 mg daily is recommended. For patients with rs2231142 GG genotype, 500 mg a day is required at RBCs of 3.9 × 10¹²/L and 4.9 × 10¹²/L.

Conclusion

RBC and rs2231142 contribute to the pharmacokinetic variation of imatinib and personalized dose recommendations based on patient characteristics may be necessary.

Association between anlotinib trough plasma concentration and treatment outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Efficacy and toxicities of anlotinib (ANL) show large inter-patient variation, which may partly be explained by differences in ANL exposure. Exposure-response/toxicities relationship have not been investigated for ANL. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the association between the trough plasma concentration (C_trough) of ANL and treatment outcomes in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC who started third-line or further ANL alone therapy between January 2021 and October 2022. This study examined the ANL C_trough and clinical response evaluation at day 43 after initiation of ANL treatment. We evaluated the association between the ANL C_trough and clinical efficacy and toxicities. Additionally, this study defined patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) as responder. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve combined with Youden index was identify the potential threshold value of ANL C_trough for the responder.

Results

52 patients were evaluated for analyses. The median ANL C_trough was 11.45ng/ml (range, 3.69-26.36 ng/ml). The ANL C_trough values in the PR group (n=6, 15.51 ng/ml (range, 8.19-17.37 ng/ml)) was significantly higher than in the PD group (n=8, 7.44 ng/ml (range, 5.41-14.69 ng/ml), p=0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC_ROC) was 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.93; p=0.022) and threshold value of ANL C_trough predicting responder was 10.29 ng/ml (sensitivity 65.9% and specificity 87.5%, the best Youden index was 0.53). The disease control rate (DCR) was 84.6%, and DCR was significantly higher in the high-exposure group (≥10.29ng/ml) than low-exposure group (<10.29ng/ml) (96.67% vs 68.18%, p=0.005). Although there was no significant difference in ANL C_trough between grade ≥ 3 and grade ≤2 toxicities, the incidence of any grade hand-foot syndrome (70.0% vs 36.36%, p=0.016) and thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation (53.33% vs 22.73%, p =0.026) was significantly higher in the high-exposure group compared with the low-exposure group.

Conclusions

Considering these results, we propose that maintaining ANL C_trough ≥ 10.29ng/ml was important for achieving the response in advanced NSCLC patients treated with ANL.

Considering the Oral Bioavailability of Protein Kinase Inhibitors: Essential in Assessing the Extent of Drug-Drug Interaction and Improving Clinical Practice

Protein kinase inhibitors share pharmacokinetic (PK) pathways among themselves. They are all metabolized by several cytochromes P450 (CYP). For most of them, CYP3A4 is the predominant metabolic pathway. However, their oral bioavailability differs. For example, the oral bioavailability of imatinib has been estimated at nearly 100%, but that of ibrutinib averages 3% due to its high hepatic first-pass effect. Overall, the smaller the oral bioavailability, the larger its interindividual PK variability. Indeed, for drugs with low oral bioavailability, the extent of their absorption is an additional cause (along with elimination variability) of differences in drug exposure among patients. The impact of drug-drug interaction (DDI) also differs between drugs with low or high oral bioavailability. We describe and explain why the impact of CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers is much greater for protein kinase inhibitors with low oral bioavailability. The effect of food on protein kinase inhibitors and DDIs corresponding to plasma protein binding will also be considered. Finally, the benefits of these concepts in clinical practice (including therapeutic drug monitoring) will be discussed. Overall, our main objective was to apply fundamental PK concepts to understanding the main clinical issues of these oral anticancer drugs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for cytotoxic anticancer drugs: Principles and evidence-based practices

Cytotoxic drugs are highly efficacious and also have low therapeutic index. A great degree of caution needs to be exercised in their usage. To optimize the efficacy these drugs need to be given at maximum tolerated dose which leads to significant amount of toxicity to the patient. The fine balance between efficacy and safety is the key to the success of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. However, it is possibly more rewarding to obtain that balance for this class drugs as the frequency of drug related toxicities are higher compared to the other therapeutic class and are potentially life threatening and may cause prolonged morbidity. Significant efforts have been invested in last three to four decades in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) research to understand the relationship between the drug concentration and the response achieved for therapeutic efficacy as well as drug toxicity for cytotoxic drugs. TDM evolved over this period and the evidence gathered favored its routine use for certain drugs. Since, TDM is an expensive endeavor both from economic and logistic point of view, to justify its use it is necessary to demonstrate that the implementation leads to perceivable improvement in the patient outcomes. It is indeed challenging to prove the utility of TDM in randomized controlled trials and at times may be nearly impossible to generate such data in view of the obvious findings and concern of compromising patient safety. Therefore, good quality data from well-designed observational study do add immense value to the scientific knowledge base, when they are examined in totality, despite the heterogeneity amongst them. This article compiles the summary of the evidence and the best practices for TDM for the three cytotoxic drug, busulfan, 5-FU and methotrexate. Traditional use of TDM or drug concentration data for dose modification has been witnessing a sea change and model informed precision dosing is the future of cytotoxic drug therapeutic management.

Pazopanib-Induced Liver Injury in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Report of Two Cases

We report two cases of pazopanib (PAZ)-induced liver injury in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The first patient was a 70-year-old female who was diagnosed with right renal cell carcinoma and showed tumor embolism in the inferior vena cava. PAZ was started but discontinued after about one month due to a grade four liver injury. The second patient was a 60-year-old male who was diagnosed with left renal cell carcinoma and suspected multiple lung metastases. PAZ was started following a laparoscopic left radical nephrectomy but was stopped after about a month due to a grade three liver injury. We analyzed the plasma PAZ concentrations for treatment evaluation. High plasma PAZ concentrations were observed in both patients after PAZ treatment began. Severe liver injury after PAZ administration may be associated with high plasma PAZ concentrations; hence, we should reduce PAZ dosage early. We also recommend monitoring plasma PAZ concentrations, if possible, so that physicians can either reduce the dosage or discontinue treatment to avoid further liver damage.

Effect of Concomitant Proton Pump Inhibitors with Pazopanib on Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

The absorption of pazopanib depends on gastric pH. PPIs are frequently prescribed for cancer patients to modify gastric acidity, decreasing pazopanib absorption. The aim of our study was, retrospectively, to investigate the impact of PPIs on the clinical efficacy and safety of pazopanib in a cohort of patients treated in our health center. Of the 147 patients who were included retrospectively, 79 (54%) did not take PPIs concomitantly with pazopanib (cohort 1), while 68 (46%) patients did take PPIs concomitantly with pazopanib (cohort 2). The efficacy parameters were lower in patients taking pazopanib and PPIs: the i/tumor response was statistically different between the two cohorts (p = 0.008), in particular, with 19% vs. 3% of the objective response and 24% vs. 43% of progression in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively; ii/median overall survival was 17.6 (95% CI: 12.5−32.8) months in cohort 1 and 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.9−18.6) in cohort 2 (HR = 1.7 [95% CI: 1.2−2.5]; p < 0.006); on multivariable analysis, overall survival was associated with performance status, PPI intake, tumor location, hemoglobin, and PMN/lymphocyte ratio. In contrast, the dose reduction for toxicity and severe adverse events were (non-significantly) less frequent in cohort 1. To conclude, our study shows that combining PPIs with pazopanib has an adverse effect on overall survival. The clinical modifications that were observed are in line with a decrease in pazopanib absorption due to PPIs. This co-medication should be avoided.

DCBLD2 regulates vascular hyperplasia by modulating the platelet derived growth factor receptor-β endocytosis through Caveolin-1 in vascular smooth muscle cells

DCBLD2 is a neuropilin-like transmembrane protein that is up-regulated during arterial remodeling in humans, rats, and mice. Activation of PDGFR-β via PDGF triggers receptor phosphorylation and endocytosis. Subsequent activation of downstream signals leads to the stimulation of phenotypic conversion of VSMCs and arterial wall proliferation, which are common pathological changes in vascular remodeling diseases such as atherosclerosis, hypertension, and restenosis after angioplasty. In this study, we hypothesized that DCBLD2 regulates neointimal hyperplasia through the regulation of PDGFR-β endocytosis of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) through Caveolin-1 (Cav-1). Compared with wild-type (WT) mice or control littermate mice, the germline or VSMC conditional deletion of the Dcbld2 gene resulted in a significant increase in the thickness of the tunica media in the carotid artery ligation. To elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms, VSMCs were isolated from the aorta of WT or Dcbld2-/- mice and were stimulated with PDGF. Western blotting assays demonstrated that Dcbld2 deletion increased the PDGF signaling pathway. Biotin labeling test and membrane-cytosol separation test showed that after DCBLD2 was knocked down or knocked out, the level of PDGFR-β on the cell membrane was significantly reduced, while the amount of PDGFR-β in the cytoplasm increased. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that after DCBLD2 gene knock-out, the binding of PDGFR-β and Cav-1 in the cytoplasm significantly increased. Double immunofluorescence staining showed that PDGFR-β accumulated Cav-1/lysosomes earlier than for control cells, which indicated that DCBLD2 gene knock-down or deletion accelerated the endocytosis of PDGF-induced PDGFR-β in VSMCs. In order to confirm that DCBLD2 affects the relationship between Cav-1 and PDGFR-β, proteins extracted from VSMCs cultured in vitro were derived from WT and Dcbld2-/- mice, whereas co-immunoprecipitation suggested that the combination of DCBLD2 and Cav-1 reduced the bond between Cav-1 and PDGFR-β, and DCBLD2 knock-out was able to enhance the interaction between Cav-1 and PDGFR-β. Therefore, the current results suggest that DCBLD2 may inhibit the caveolae-dependent endocytosis of PDGFR-β by anchoring the receptor on the cell membrane. Based on its ability to regulate the activity of PDGFR-β, DCBLD2 may be a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Feasibility of therapeutic drug monitoring of sorafenib in patients with liver or thyroid cancer

INTRODUCTION

Sorafenib is a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and desmoid fibromatosis. As high inter-individual variability exists in exposure, there is a scientific rationale to pursue therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We investigated the feasibility of TDM in patients on sorafenib and tried to identify sub-groups in whom pharmacokinetically (PK) guided-dosing might be of added value.

METHODS

We included patients who started on sorafenib (between October 2017 and June 2020) at the recommended dose of 400 mg BID or with a step-up dosing schedule. Plasma trough levels (C_trough) were measured at pre-specified time-points. Increasing the dose was advised if C_trough was below the target of 3750 ng/mL and toxicity was manageable.

RESULTS

A total of 150 samples from 36 patients were collected. Thirty patients (83 %) had a C_trough below the prespecified target concentration at a certain time point during treatment. Toxicity from sorafenib hampered dosing according to target C_trough in almost half of the patients. In 11 patients, dosing was adjusted based on C_trough. In three patients, this resulted in an adequate C_trough without additional toxicity four weeks after the dose increase. In the remaining eight patients, dose adjustment based on C_trough did not result in a C_trough above the target or caused excessive toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM for sorafenib is not of added value in daily clinical practice. In most cases, toxicity restricts the possibility of dose escalations.

Targeting the Akt/PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway for complete eradication of keloid disease by sunitinib

Keloid disease is a nodular lesion, tumor-like but not cancerous, and characterized of excessive proliferation of fibroblasts and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) components. This condition often causes itching, pain and cosmetic disfigurement, significantly reducing patient quality of life. To date, no universally effective therapies are available, possibly due to inadequate understanding of keloid pathogenesis. As an oral small-molecule inhibitor of certain tyrosine kinase receptors, sunitinib has shown significant therapeutic effects in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, it has never been tested if keloid therapy can be effective for the management of keloids. This study thus aims to explore the potential of sunitinib for keloid treatment. Keloid-derived fibroblasts (KFs) were successfully isolated and demonstrated proliferative advantage to normal skin-derived fibroblasts (NFs). Additionally, sunitinib showed specific cytotoxicity and inhibition of invasion, and induced cell cycle arrest and significant apoptosis in KFs. These effects were accompanied by complete suppression of ECM component expression, including collagen types 1 and 3, upregulation of autophagy-associated LC3B and significant suppression of the Akt/PI3K/mTOR pathway. Moreover, a keloid explant culture model was successfully established and used to test the therapeutic efficacy of sunitinib on keloid formation in nude mice. Sunitinib was found to induce complete regression of keloid explant fragments in nude mice, showing significantly higher therapeutic efficacy than the most commonly used intralesional drug triamcinolone acetonide (TAC). These data suggest that sunitinib effectively inhibits keloid development through suppression of the Akt/PI3K/mTOR pathway and thus can be potentially developed as a monotherapy or combination therapy for the effective treatment of keloid disease.

Novel Pharmacological Treatment Options in Pediatric Glioblastoma-A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Childhood glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor in children that has a very poor prognosis. Standard therapy includes surgery, irradiation and chemotherapy with temozolomide. So far, there is no effective drug treatment for pediatric glioblastoma patients. This systematic review aims to outline currently available data on novel pharmacological treatment options. None of the included phase II studies showed any benefit regarding overall survival or a prolongation of stable disease. New genomic technologies discovered the biologic heterogeneity of these tumors, demanding more individualized immunotherapeutic and targeted approaches. Autoimmune modulated therapies and further targeting of tumor-specific receptors provide promising preclinical results. Clinical trials aligned to the tumor characteristics are needed to establish effective new therapeutic approaches.

Abstract

Background: Pediatric glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive central nervous system tumor in children that has dismal prognosis. Standard of care is surgery with subsequent irradiation and temozolomide. We aimed to outline currently available data on novel pharmacological treatments for pediatric GBM. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase, including reports published in English from 2010 to 2021. We included randomized trials, cohort studies and case series. Phase I trials were not analyzed. We followed PRISMA guidelines, assessed the quality of the eligible reports using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and the RoB-2 tool and registered the protocol on PROSPERO. Results: We included 6 out of 1122 screened reports. All six selected reports were prospective, multicenter phase II trials (five single-arm and one randomized controlled trial). None of the investigated novel treatment modalities showed any benefit regarding overall or progression free survival. Conclusions: To date, the role of pharmacological approaches regarding pediatric GBM remains unclear, since no novel treatment approach could provide a significant impact on overall or progression free survival. Further research should aim to combine different treatment strategies in large international multicenter trials with central comprehensive diagnostics regarding subgrouping. These novel treatment approaches should include targeted and immunotherapeutic treatments, potentially leading to a more successful outcome.

Nintedanib overcomes drug resistance from upregulation of FGFR signaling and imatinib-induced KIT mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Drug resistance remains a major challenge in the clinical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). While acquired on‐target mutations of mast/stem cell growth factor receptor (KIT) kinase is the major resistance mechanism, activation of alternative signalling pathways may also play a role. Although several second‐ and third‐generation KIT kinase inhibitors have been developed that could overcome some of the KIT mutations conferring resistance, the low clinical responses and narrow safety window have limited their broad application. The present study revealed that nintedanib not only overcame resistance induced by a panel of KIT primary and secondary mutations, but also overcame ERK‐reactivation‐mediated resistance caused by the upregulation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) activity. In preclinical models of GISTs, nintedanib significantly inhibited the proliferation of imatinib‐resistant cells, including GIST‐5R, GIST‐T1/T670I and GIST patient‐derived primary cells. In addition, it also exhibited dose‐dependent inhibition of ERK phosphorylation upon FGF ligand stimulation. In vivo antitumour activity was also observed in several xenograft GIST models. Considering the well‐documented safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of nintedanib, this finding provides evidence for the repurposing of nintedanib as a new therapy for the treatment of GIST patients with de novo or acquired resistance to imatinib.

Case Report: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Induced Lymphadenopathy in Desmoid Tumor Patients

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are nowadays a valuable treatment of desmoid tumors, a rare mesenchymal neoplasm. Although many side effects of imatinib and pazopanib, commonly or rarely occurring, have been described, reactional lymphadenopathy has not yet been reported. In this publication, we report two cases of patients with desmoid tumors, treated with pazopanib and imatinib, who developed reactional lymphadenopathy. As this side effect is presented as a newly formed mass, it can result in new diagnostic questions and added imaging tests and can even lead to discontinuation of the treatment. This report may help the clinicians facing similar problems adopt a "watch and wait" approach.

Intra-Tumoral Pharmacokinetics of Pazopanib in Combination with Radiotherapy in Patients with Non-Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

There is a lack of understanding whether plasma levels of anticancer drugs (such as pazopanib) correlate with intra-tumoral levels and whether the plasma compartment is the best surrogate for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to quantify pazopanib concentrations in tumor tissue, to assess the correlation between tumor concentrations and plasma concentrations and between tumor concentrations and efficacy. In this clinical trial, non-metastatic STS patients were treated with neo-adjuvant concurrent radiotherapy and pazopanib. Plasma samples and tumor biopsies were collected, and pazopanib concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-four evaluable patients were included. The median pazopanib tumor concentration was 19.2 µg/g (range 0.149-200 µg/g). A modest correlation was found between tumor concentrations and plasma levels of pazopanib (ρ = 0.41, p = 0.049). No correlation was found between tumor concentrations and percentage of viable tumor cells (p > 0.05); however, a trend towards less viable tumor cells in patients with high pazopanib concentrations in tumor tissue was observed in a categorical analysis. Possible explanations for the lack of correlation might be heterogeneity of the tumors and timing of the biopsy procedure.

External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models of imatinib in adults diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukaemia

AIMS

Imatinib is considered the standard first-line treatment in newly diagnosed patients with chronic-phase myeloid leukaemia (CML). Several imatinib population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models have been developed. However, their predictive performance has not been well established when extrapolated to different populations. Therefore, this study aimed to perform an external evaluation of available imatinib popPK models developed mainly in adult patients, and to evaluate the improvement in individual model-based predictions through Bayesian forecasting computed by each model at different treatment occasions.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted through PubMed and Scopus to identify popPK models. Therapeutic drug monitoring data collected in adult CML patients treated with imatinib was used for external evaluation, including prediction- and simulated-based diagnostics together with Bayesian forecasting analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen imatinib popPK studies were included for model-performance evaluation. A total of 99 imatinib samples were collected from 48 adult CML patients undergoing imatinib treatment with a minimum of one plasma concentration measured at steady-state between January 2016 and December 2020. The model proposed by Petain et al showed the best performance concerning prediction-based diagnostics in the studied population. Bayesian forecasting demonstrated a significant improvement in predictive performance at the second visit. Inter-occasion variability contributed to reducing bias and improving individual model-based predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

Imatinib popPK studies developed in Caucasian subjects including α1-acid glycoprotein showed the best model performance in terms of overall bias and precision. Moreover, two imatinib samples from different visits appear sufficient to reach an adequate model-based individual prediction performance trough Bayesian forecasting.

Association of sunitinib concentration and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with a 2-week-on and 1-week-off schedule

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Sunitinib is used as a first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The primary aim of this study was to determine the optimal total sunitinib (sunitinib plus N-desethyl sunitinib) trough concentration for the alternative dosing schedule: 2-week-on and 1-week-off schedule (2/1 schedule).

METHODS

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with the 2/1 schedule of sunitinib, whose total sunitinib concentrations were available, were recruited for this study. Out of 19 patients, 17 whose sunitinib dosage was not changed until the measurement of drug concentration were eligible for the analysis of the relationship between total sunitinib concentration and clinical outcome. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters in 19 patients were estimated via the Bayesian analysis.

RESULTS

The onset of severe (grade ≥3) adverse effects among 17 patients during 3 weeks as a first course of sunitinib therapy was observed in 7 (41.2%) patients. The median total sunitinib concentration in patients with severe adverse effects was significantly higher compared with that in patients without severe adverse effects [median: 119 (113-131) vs. 87.8 (77.4-102) ng/mL, p = 0.01]. According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis of the onset of severe adverse effects, the cut-off value of the total sunitinib concentration was 108 ng/mL. Patients with a total sunitinib concentration lower than 108 ng/mL had a longer time to first dose reduction or withdrawal due to adverse effects compared with those with a total sunitinib concentration of 108 ng/mL or higher (p = 0.03). The probability without treatment failure was not significantly different between the two concentration groups. In addition, the estimated sunitinib apparent oral clearance (CL/F) was significantly lower in the severe adverse effects group. Our simulation demonstrated that 0.67-time dose is needed for patients with approximately 90.0 ng/mL of sunitinib concentration on day 7 to maintain the concentration at the same level as the patients with higher CL/F.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Maintaining the total sunitinib trough concentrations of less than 108 ng/mL is safe to avoid the onset of serious adverse effects without increasing the treatment failure in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with the 2/1 schedule of sunitinib.

Therapeutic potential of thymoquinone in combination therapy against cancer and cancer stem cells

The long-term success of standard anticancer monotherapeutic strategies has been hampered by intolerable side effects, resistance to treatment and cancer relapse. These monotherapeutic strategies shrink the tumor bulk but do not effectively eliminate the population of self-renewing cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are normally present within the tumor. These surviving CSCs develop mechanisms of resistance to treatment and refuel the tumor, thus causing cancer relapse. To ensure durable tumor control, research has moved away from adopting the monotreatment paradigm towards developing and using combination therapy. Combining different therapeutic modalities has demonstrated significant therapeutic outcomes by strengthening the anti-tumor potential of monotreatment against cancer and cancer stem cells, mitigating their toxic adverse effects, and ultimately overcoming resistance. Recently, there has been growing interest in combining natural products from different sources or with clinically used chemotherapeutics to further improve treatment efficacy and tolerability. Thymoquinone (TQ), the main bioactive constituent of Nigella sativa, has gained great attention in combination therapy research after demonstrating its low toxicity to normal cells and remarkable anticancer efficacy in extensive preclinical studies in addition to its ability to target chemoresistant CSCs. Here, we provide an overview of the therapeutic responses resulting from combining TQ with conventional therapeutic agents such as alkylating agents, antimetabolites and antimicrotubules as well as with topoisomerase inhibitors and non-coding RNA. We also review data on anticancer effects of TQ when combined with ionizing radiation and several natural products such as vitamin D3, melatonin and other compounds derived from Chinese medicinal plants. The focus of this review is on two outcomes of TQ combination therapy, namely eradicating CSCs and treating various types of cancers. In conclusion, the ability of TQ to potentiate the anticancer activity of many chemotherapeutic agents and sensitize cancer cells to radiotherapy makes it a promising molecule that could be used in combination therapy to overcome resistance to standard chemotherapeutic agents and reduce their associated toxicities.

Clinical-Based vs. Model-Based Adaptive Dosing Strategy: Retrospective Comparison in Real-World mRCC Patients Treated with Sunitinib

Different target exposures with sunitinib have been proposed in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, such as trough concentrations or AUCs. However, most of the time, rather than therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), clinical evidence is preferred to tailor dosing, i.e., by reducing the dose when treatment-related toxicities show, or increasing dosing if no signs of efficacy are observed. Here, we compared such empirical dose adjustment of sunitinib in mRCC patients, with the parallel dosing proposals of a PK/PD model with TDM support. In 31 evaluable patients treated with sunitinib, 53.8% had an empirical change in dosing after treatment started (i.e., 46.2% decrease in dosing, 7.6% increase in dosing). Clinical benefit was observed in 54.1% patients, including 8.3% with complete response. Overall, 58.1% of patients experienced treatment discontinuation eventually, either because of toxicities or progressive disease. When choosing 50-100 ng/mL trough concentrations as a target exposure (i.e., sunitinib + active metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib), 45% patients were adequately exposed. When considering 1200-2150 ng/mL.h as a target AUC (i.e., sunitinib + active metabolite N-desethyl sunitinib), only 26% patients were in the desired therapeutic window. TDM with retrospective PK/PD modeling would have suggested decreasing sunitinib dosing in a much larger number of patients as compared with empirical dose adjustment. Indeed, when using target trough concentrations, the model proposed reducing dosing for 61% patients, and up to 84% patients based upon target AUC. Conversely, the model proposed increasing dosing in 9.7% of patients when using target trough concentrations and in 6.5% patients when using target AUC. Overall, TDM with adaptive dosing would have led to tailoring sunitinib dosing in a larger number of patients (i.e., 53.8% vs. 71-91%, depending on the chosen metrics for target exposure) than a clinical-based decision. Interestingly, sunitinib dosing was empirically reduced in 41% patients who displayed early-onset severe toxicities, whereas model-based recommendations would have immediately proposed to reduce dosing in more than 80% of those patients. This observation suggests that early treatment-related toxicities could have been partly avoided using prospective PK/PD modeling with adaptive dosing. Conversely, the possible impact of model-based adapted dosing on efficacy could not be fully evaluated because no clear relationship was found between baseline exposure levels and sunitinib efficacy measured at 3 months.

Exploratory analysis of target concentration of lenvatinib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate exposure-toxicity/efficacy relationship of lenvatinib by determining its target trough concentration for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational study, 28 HCC patients who had been treated with lenvatinib were enrolled between August 2018 and April 2020. We evaluated the association between the trough lenvatinib concentration and occurrence of grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Additionally, we estimated the association of the trough lenvatinib concentration with responder status (disease control; complete response, partial response, or stable disease), and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The mean trough lenvatinib concentration was significantly higher in the group with grade ≥ 3 toxicity (n = 15) than in the group with grade ≤ 2 toxicity (n = 13). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the threshold values of the trough lenvatinib concentrations for predicting grade ≥ 3 toxicities and responder status were 71.4 ng/mL [area under the curve (AUC) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.00; p < 0.05] and 36.8 ng/mL (AUC 0.95, 95% CI 0.85-1.00; p < 0.05), respectively. Lenvatinib concentrations of 36.8-71.4 ng/mL resulted in longer PFS than concentrations < 36.8 ng/mL and ≥ 71.4 ng /mL [median 13.3 months (36.8-71.4 ng/mL) vs. 3.5 months (< 36.8 ng/mL) and 7.8 months (≥ 71.4 ng /mL), respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Considering these results, we propose that the target trough concentration of lenvatinib could be 36.8-71.4 ng/mL for maintaining disease control status and reducing grade ≥ 3 toxicity in the treatment of HCC.

VOTRAGE study: Phase I dose-escalation study of pazopanib in unfit older patients

BACKGROUND

Pazopanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor given at the approved dose of 800 mg orally once daily (OD), but often requiring individual dose adjustment due to toxicity. Limited data is available to guide prescription in older patients especially the unfit according to geriatric assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

VOTRAGE is a 3 + 3 dose-escalation, open-label phase I trial of continuous OD oral administration of pazopanib to evaluate safety, PK and PD data in unfit older patients with advanced solid tumors. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). PK data were compared with those obtained in younger adult patients in a population PK analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with a median age of 82.5 years (range 75-91) were included in three dosing cohorts (400, 600, and 800 mg daily). Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed in five patients at 800 mg and one DLT at 600 mg in six evaluable patients. MTD was defined as level 2 dose (600 mg). Individual oral clearance was not correlated with age. A relationship was observed between the occurrence of DLT and pazopanib plasma exposure. Decreased oral bioavailability of pazopanib when given with proton-pump inhibitors was confirmed in this group of patients.

CONCLUSION

We recommend performing geriatric assessment in patients older than 75 and starting pazopanib at 600 mg per day in unfit older patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring appears very helpful in this population.

Limited Sampling Strategy for Determination of Ibrutinib Plasma Exposure: Joint Analyses with Metabolite Data

Therapeutic drug monitoring of ibrutinib is based on the area under the curve of concentration vs. time (AUC_IBRU) instead of trough concentration (C_min,ss) because of a limited accumulation in plasma. Our objective was to identify a limited sampling strategy (LSS) to estimate AUC_IBRU associated with Bayesian estimation. The actual AUC_IBRU of 85 patients was determined by the Bayesian analysis of the full pharmacokinetic profile of ibrutinib concentrations (pre-dose T0 and 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h post-dose) and experimental AUC_IBRU were derived considering combinations of one to four sampling times. The T0–1–2–4 design was the most accurate LSS (root-mean-square error RMSE = 11.0%), and three-point strategies removing the 1 h or 2 h points (RMSE = 22.7% and 14.5%, respectively) also showed good accuracy. The correlation between the actual AUC_IBRU and C_min,ss was poor (r² = 0.25). The joint analysis of dihydrodiol-ibrutinib metabolite concentrations did not improve the predictive performance of AUC_IBRU. These results were confirmed in a prospective validation cohort (n = 27 patients). At least three samples, within the pre-dose and 4 h post-dose period, are necessary to estimate ibrutinib exposure accurately.

Individualized Management of Blood Concentration in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal tumor, and surgical resection is the first choice for the treatment of the disease, but since the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib (IM), the prognosis of the disease has undergone revolutionary changes. According to the current version of the guidelines, most GIST patients receive a fixed dose without taking into account their own individual differences, resulting in a wide difference in blood concentration, adverse reactions and prognosis. With more studies on the relationship between blood drug concentrations and prognosis, the concept of individualized therapy has been paid more attention by researchers. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has also been made available for the research field of GIST targeted therapy. How to reduce the incidence of drug resistance and adverse reactions in patients with GISTs has become the focus of the current research. This article reviews the common monitoring methods and timing of TKIs blood concentration, the reasonable range of blood drug concentration, the toxic or adverse effects caused by high blood drug concentration, some possible factors affecting blood drug concentration and recent research progress, in order to discuss and summarize the treatment strategy of individual blood drug concentration, improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the adverse effects as much as possible.

Pharmacokinetically guided dosing has the potential to improve real-world outcomes of pazopanib

It remains unclear whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of pazopanib improves treatment outcomes in routine clinical practice. We did a prospective cohort study to evaluate the benefits of TDM for pazopanib therapy in real-world practice. Among 25 patients with pharmacokinetically guided dosing, only 5 (20%, 95% confidence interval 6.8-40.7%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. However, 5 (41.7%, 95% confidence interval 15.2-72.3%) of historical controls including 12 patients not receiving such a strategy experienced adverse events leading to early termination. PK-guided dosing significantly increased median time-to-treatment discontinuation (252 vs 74 days, P = .012) with reduced toxicity and improved overall survival (not reached vs 313 days, P = .002) relative to conventional dosing in the control group. In conclusion, PK-guided dose adaptation through the use of TDM has the potential to improve treatment outcomes of pazopanib in routine clinical practice, warranting larger, randomized studies.

The analysis of 3-year adjuvant therapy with imatinib in patients with high-risk molecular profiled gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated in routine practice

INTRODUCTION

The real-world data on adjuvant imatinib therapy in high-risk primary GIST are scarce.

METHODS

We have analysed the data of 107 consecutive patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) after resection treated with adjuvant imatinib (for planned 3 years with initial dose 400 mg daily, started not later than 4 months after operation) in 6 oncological centres in 2013-2018. All patients were required to have high risk of recurrence (at least 50% according to NCCN/AFIP criteria), known mutational status to exclude PDGFRA D842V mutants and KIT/PDGFRA-wild type cases from therapy without any further selection. Median follow-up time was 27 months.

RESULTS

The most common primary localization of GIST was small bowel (63 patients; 59%), followed by the stomach (40 patients; 37%). The majority of GIST cases harboured exon 11 KIT mutations (88 cases, 82%), 11 cases had exon 9 KIT mutations (10%), 8 had other KIT/PDGFRA mutations potentially sensitive to imatinib. Forty patients (37%) finished 3-year adjuvant imatinib therapy as planned, 48 (45%) still continue therapy, 5 (4.5%) patients had finished adjuvant therapy prematurely due to toxicity, 6 (6%) due to disease progression on treatment and 8 (7.5%) due to other reasons. The disease relapse was detected in 19 patients, of them in 5 cases in exon 9 KIT mutants (45%), and 14 cases in patients with exon 11 KIT mutations (11%) [p < 0.01]. Estimated 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate is 78%.

CONCLUSIONS

The early results of adjuvant therapy with imatinib in routine practice outside clinical trials in high-risk mutation-driven GIST patients only confirm high efficacy of this therapy with better tolerability than in clinical trials. We found overrepresentation of exon 9 KIT mutants and ruptured tumors in a group of patients with disease relapse.

On precision dosing of oral small molecule drugs in oncology

Personalization of oral small molecule anticancer drug doses based on individual patient blood drug levels, also known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), has the potential to significantly improve the effectiveness of treatment by maximizing drug efficacy and minimize toxicity. However, this option has not yet been widely embraced by the oncology community. Some reasons for this include increased logistical complexity of dose individualization, the lack of clinical laboratories that measure small molecule drug concentrations in support of patient care, and the lack of reimbursement of costs. However, the main obstacle may be the lack of studies clearly demonstrating that monitoring of oral small molecule anticancer drug levels actually improves clinical outcomes. Without unequivocal evidence in support of TDM-guided dose individualization, especially demonstration of improved survival with TDM in randomized controlled trials, wide acceptance of this approach by oncologists and reimbursement by insurance companies is unlikely, and patients may continue to suffer as a result of receiving incorrect drug doses. This article reviews the current status of TDM of oral small molecule drugs in oncology and intends to provide strategic insights into the design of studies for evaluating the utility of TDM in this clinical context.

Imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib: From flat-fixed dosing towards a pharmacokinetically guided personalized dose

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are anti‐cancer drugs that target tyrosine kinases, enzymes that are involved in multiple cellular processes. Currently, multiple oral TKIs have been introduced in the treatment of solid tumours, all administered in a fixed dose, although large interpatient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability is described. For imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib exposure‐treatment outcome (efficacy and toxicity) relationships have been established and therapeutic windows have been defined, therefore dose optimization based on the measured blood concentration, called therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), can be valuable in increasing efficacy and reducing the toxicity of these drugs.

In this review, an overview of the current knowledge on TDM guided individualized dosing of imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib for the treatment of solid tumours is presented. We summarize preclinical and clinical data that have defined thresholds for efficacy and toxicity. Furthermore, PK models and factors that influence the PK of these drugs which partly explain the interpatient PK variability are summarized. Finally, pharmacological interventions that have been performed to optimize plasma concentrations are described. Based on current literature, we advise which methods should be used to optimize exposure to imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.