1
|
You J, Ganann R, Wilson M, Carusone SC, MacNeil M, Whitmore C, Dafel A, Dhamanaskar R, Ling E, Dingman L, Falbo AT, Kirk M, Luyckx J, Petrie P, Weldon D, Boothe K, Abelson J. Public Engagement in Health Policy-Making for Older Adults: A Systematic Search and Scoping Review. Health Expect 2024; 27:e70008. [PMID: 39188109 PMCID: PMC11347750 DOI: 10.1111/hex.70008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As the world's population ages, there has been increasing attention to developing health policies to support older adults. Engaging older adults in policy-making is one way to ensure that policy decisions align with their needs and priorities. However, ageist stereotypes often underestimate older adults' ability to participate in such initiatives. This scoping review aims to describe the characteristics and impacts of public engagement initiatives designed to help inform health policy-making for older adults. METHODS A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature (English only) describing public engagement initiatives in health policy-making for older adults was conducted using six electronic databases, Google and the Participedia website. No geographical, methodological or time restrictions were applied to the search. Eligibility criteria were purposefully broad to capture a wide array of relevant engagement initiatives. The outcomes of interest included participants, engagement methods and reported impacts. RESULTS This review included 38 papers. The majority of public engagement initiatives were funded or initiated by governments or government agencies as a formal activity to address policy issues, compared to initiatives without a clear link to a specific policy-making process (e.g., research projects). While most initiatives engaged older adults as target participants, there was limited reporting on efforts to achieve participant diversity. Consultation-type engagement activities were most prevalent, compared to deliberative and collaborative approaches. Impacts of public engagement were frequently reported without formal evaluations. Notably, a few articles reported negative impacts of such initiatives. CONCLUSION This review describes how public engagement practices have been conducted to help inform health policy-making for older adults and the documented impacts. The findings can assist policymakers, government staff, researchers and seniors' advocates in supporting the design and execution of public engagement initiatives in this policy sector. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Older adult partners from the McMaster University Collaborative for Health and Aging provided strategic advice throughout the key phases of this review, including developing a review protocol, data charting and synthesis and interpreting and presenting the review findings. This collaborative partnership was an essential aspect of this review, enhancing its relevance and meaningfulness for older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeonghwa You
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI)McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
| | | | - Michael Wilson
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and ImpactMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
- McMaster Health ForumHamiltonCanada
| | - Soo Chan Carusone
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI)McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
- McMaster Collaborative for Health and AgingHamiltonCanada
| | | | | | - Andrea Dafel
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI)McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
| | - Roma Dhamanaskar
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI)McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
| | - Eugenia Ling
- School of NursingMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
| | - Lance Dingman
- McMaster Collaborative for Health and AgingHamiltonCanada
| | - A. Tina Falbo
- McMaster Collaborative for Health and AgingHamiltonCanada
| | - Michael Kirk
- McMaster Collaborative for Health and AgingHamiltonCanada
| | - Joyce Luyckx
- McMaster Collaborative for Health and AgingHamiltonCanada
| | | | - Donna Weldon
- McMaster Collaborative for Health and AgingHamiltonCanada
| | - Katherine Boothe
- Department of Political ScienceMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA)McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
| | - Julia Abelson
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI)McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA)McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Riet-Nales DA, van den Bemt B, van Bodegom D, Cerreta F, Dooley B, Eggenschwyler D, Hirschlérova B, Jansen PAF, Karapinar-Çarkit F, Moran A, Span J, Stegemann S, Sundberg K. Commentary on the EMA reflection paper on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:1500-1514. [PMID: 35141926 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Older people are often affected by impaired organ and bodily functions resulting in multimorbidity and polypharmacy, turning them into the main user group of many medicines. Very often, medicines have not specifically been developed for older people, causing practical medication problems for them like limited availability of easy to swallow formulations, easy to open packaging and dosing instructions for enteral administration. In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published a reflection paper 'Pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population', which discusses how the emerging needs of an ageing European population can be addressed by medicines regulation. The paper intends to help industry to better consider the needs of older people during pharmaceutical/clinical medicines development by summarising data on the most relevant topics, providing early suggestions on how to move forward and prompting expert discussions and studies into knowledge gaps. Topics include patient acceptability, (dis)advantages of an administration route, formulation, dosage form, packaging, dosing device and user instruction. While the paper is directed at older people and the pharmaceutical industry, the reflections are also relevant to younger patients with similar disease-related needs and of value to other stakeholders parties, e.g., healthcare professionals, academics, patients and caregivers, as the paper makes clear what can be expected from industry and where collaborative work is needed. This commentary provides an overview of the different steps in the development of the reflection paper, discusses points considered most controversial and/or subject to (multidisciplinary) expert discussions and indicates their value for real world clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A van Riet-Nales
- Department of Chemical Pharmaceutical Assessments, Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bart van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - David van Bodegom
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leyden Academy on Vitality and Ageing, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Francesca Cerreta
- Scientific Evidence Generation Department, Human Medicines Division, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Brian Dooley
- Quality and Safety of Medicines Department, Human Medicines Division, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Blanka Hirschlérova
- Department of Pharmaceutical Assessment of Chemical and Herbal Products, State Institute for Drug Control (SUKL), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Paul A F Jansen
- Department of Chemical Pharmaceutical Assessments, Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Geriatric Department, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy in Old Persons (EPHOR), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Abigail Moran
- Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK
| | - Jan Span
- Department of Chemical Pharmaceutical Assessments, Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sven Stegemann
- Institute of Process and Particle Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
| | - Katarina Sundberg
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Biotechnology, Swedish Medical Products Agency (MPA), Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stegemann S, van Riet‐Nales D, de Boer A. Demographics in the 2020s-Longevity as a challenge for pharmaceutical drug development, prescribing, dispensing, patient care and quality of life. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:1899-1903. [PMID: 32939841 PMCID: PMC7495272 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Stegemann
- Institute of Process and Particle EngineeringGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Riet-Nales DA, Sundberg K, de Boer A, Hirschlérova B. Developing patient-centric medicines for older people: Reflections from the draft EMA paper on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:2008-2013. [PMID: 32830323 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased global longevity requires a re-evaluation of current structures in society to adapt to the consequential demographic shift. As (very) old people are prone to impaired human organ and body functions resulting in, for example, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, hospitalisation and problems in medication management, it is increasingly acknowledged that re-evaluations should include the suitability of pharmaceutical patient care as one of the cornerstones of public health. Following the 2011 European Medicines Agency (EMA) Geriatric Strategy, in 2017 the EMA published the draft "Reflection paper on the pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population". The draft paper was opened for public consultation and specific attention and feedback (either supportive or with a proposal for revision) was asked on three design aspects: tablet breaking, drug administration through enteral feeding tubes and medication management. Following publication, the draft paper was presented at two public conferences attended by participants from different disciplines. This manuscript is intended to draw the attention of different stakeholder parties to the urgent need to collaborate on the emerging issues arising from increasing longevity and multimorbidity, and especially those associated with pharmaceutical patient care and drug product design, including the need for collaborative research into existing or emerging knowledge gaps. The manuscript focuses on the three aforementioned aspects of pharmaceutical development (tablet breaking, drug administration through enteral feeding tubes and medication management) as these highly relate to medication safety and efficacy and constitute persistent and typical challenges for older people, caregivers and healthcare professionals in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A van Riet-Nales
- Medicines Evaluation Board, DVRN: International Collaboration Center, ADB: Chair of MEB, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Katarina Sundberg
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Biotechnology, Swedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anthonius de Boer
- Medicines Evaluation Board, DVRN: International Collaboration Center, ADB: Chair of MEB, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Blanka Hirschlérova
- Department of Pharmaceutical Assessment of Chemical and Herbal Products, State Institute for Drug Control, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|