1
|
Strauss D, de la Salle S, Sloshower J, Williams MT. Research abuses against people of colour and other vulnerable groups in early psychedelic research. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2021; 48:medethics-2021-107262. [PMID: 34253622 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
There is a growing resurgence in the study of psychedelic medicines for the treatment of mental health and substance use disorders. However, certain early investigations are marred by questionable research methods, abuses against research participants, and covert Central Intelligence Agency financial involvement. The purpose of this study was to understand how and to what extent people of colour and other vulnerable populations, specifically, individuals who were incarcerated or incapacitated due to mental health issues (inpatients with psychotic disorders), were exploited during the first wave of psychedelic research in the USA (1950-1980). To do so, we reviewed available empirical publications according to current ethical standards. Variables of interest included race and ethnicity of participants, population vulnerability, drug administration conditions, informed consent and undue influence. Our findings draw attention to the history of research abuses against people of colour in Western psychedelic research. In light of these findings, we urge a call-to-action to current psychedelic researchers to prioritise culturally inclusive and socially responsible research methods in current and future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Strauss
- Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jordan Sloshower
- Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Psychiatry, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Employees are often considered a vulnerable research population due to concerns about consent and confidentiality, but there is insufficient guidance regarding their ethical inclusion in research. In the context of Covid-19, frontline health care workers comprise a particularly relevant research population in light of their risks of viral exposure and psychological strain, among other factors. They may therefore be targeted for research conducted at their place of employment and benefit from participating in such research. Beyond Covid-19, there are other circumstances in which health care workers may be considered for inclusion in research conducted by or with the involvement of their colleagues and employers. As investigators, sponsors, institutional review boards, and others assess the ethical permissibility of these scenarios, as well as relevant protections, we recommend systematic consideration of social and scientific value, validity, fairness, risks and benefits, voluntary consent, respect, and independent review. There is often good reason to specifically target health care workers for inclusion in Covid-19 research (beyond convenience), and they should not be excluded from research offering the prospect of direct benefit. However, additional safeguards may be necessary in employer-based research to avoid scientific bias, promote voluntariness, and solicit stakeholder input. Research personnel should be permitted to enroll in their own Covid-19 studies only when participation offers them the prospect of unique benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Fernandez Lynch
- John Russell Dickson, MD Presidential Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Dawn Lundin
- Director of clinical research compliance at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Emma A Meagher
- Professor of medicine and pharmacology, vice dean and clinical research officer, and senior associate vice provost for human research at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smilan LE. The Revised Common Rule and Mental Illness: Enduring Gaps in Protections. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE 2020; 46:413-444. [PMID: 33413011 DOI: 10.1177/0098858820975532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa E Smilan
- Lisa E. Smilan, Visiting Scholar, Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; J.D., George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C.; LL.M., specialization in health law, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, Baltimore, MD; Member, National Institutes of Health Intramural Institutional Review Board, Bethesda, MD. The opinions here expressed are those of the Author and completely independent of the National Institutes of Health. The Author thanks Ellen Wright Clayton for supporting this scholarship and for comments on earlier drafts. Thanks, also, to Leslie Meltzer Henry for her guidance and encouragement, and both Richard Bonnie and Xuemei Ding for their hospitality at the University of Virginia and for facilitating access to university libraries. Finally, thanks to the anonymous peer reviewers for their observations, probing questions, and helpful suggestions, and AJLM editors Jessa Boubker and Sharon Jaquez for their dedication and meticulous care in preparing this Article for publication
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bulkley JE, O'Keeffe-Rosetti M, Wendel CS, Davis JV, Danforth KN, Harrison TN, Kwan ML, Munneke J, Brooks N, Grant M, Leo MC, Banegas M, Weinmann S, McMullen CK. The effect of multiple recruitment contacts on response rates and patterns of missing data in a survey of bladder cancer survivors 6 months after cystectomy. Qual Life Res 2019; 29:879-889. [PMID: 31811594 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02379-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Bladder Cancer Quality of Life Study collected detailed and sensitive patient-reported outcomes from bladder cancer survivors in the period after bladder removal surgery, when participation in survey research may present a burden. This paper describes the study recruitment methods and examines the response rates and patterns of missing data. METHODS Detailed surveys focusing on quality of life, healthcare decision-making, and healthcare expenses were mailed to patients 5-7 months after cystectomy. We conducted up to 10 follow-up recruitment calls. We analyzed survey completion rates following each contact in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics, and patterns of missing data across survey content areas. RESULTS The overall response rate was 71% (n = 269/379). This was consistent across patient clinical characteristics; response rates were significantly higher among patients over age 70 and significantly lower among racial and ethnic minority patients compared to non-Hispanic white patients. Each follow-up contact resulted in marginal survey completion rates of at least 10%. Rates of missing data were low across most content areas, even for potentially sensitive questions. Rates of missing data differed significantly by sex, age, and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS Despite the effort required to participate in research, this population of cancer survivors showed willingness to share detailed information about quality of life, health care decision-making, and expenses, soon after major cancer surgery. Additional contacts were effective at increasing participation. Response patterns differed by race/ethnicity and other demographic factors. Our data collection methods show that it is feasible to gather detailed patient-reported outcomes during this challenging period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna E Bulkley
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA.
| | - Maureen O'Keeffe-Rosetti
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA
| | | | - James V Davis
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA
| | - Kim N Danforth
- Kaiser Permanente Department of Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Teresa N Harrison
- Kaiser Permanente Department of Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Marilyn L Kwan
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Julie Munneke
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Neon Brooks
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA
| | - Marcia Grant
- City of Hope/Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA
| | - Matthew Banegas
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA
| | - Sheila Weinmann
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA
| | - Carmit K McMullen
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227-1110, USA
| |
Collapse
|