1
|
Schafer R, Dietrich MS, Kennedy HP, Mulvaney S, Phillippi JC. "I had no choice": A mixed-methods study on access to care for vaginal breech birth. Birth 2024; 51:413-423. [PMID: 37968839 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although current recommendations support vaginal breech birth as a reasonable option, access to breech birth in US hospitals is limited. This study explored the experiences of decision-making and perceptions of access to care in people who transferred out of the hospital system to pursue home breech birth. METHODS We conducted a mixed methods study of people with a singleton, term breech fetus who transferred out of the US hospital system to pursue home breech birth. Twenty-five people completed an online demographic and psychosocial survey, and 23 (92%) participated in semi-structured interviews. We used an interpretive description approach informed by situational analysis to analyze qualitative data about participants' experiences and perceived access to care. RESULTS Of 25 individuals who left the hospital system to pursue a home breech birth, most felt denied informed choice (64%) and threatened or coerced into cesarean (68%). The majority reported low or very low autonomy in decision-making (n = 20, 80%) and high decisional satisfaction using validated measures. Many participants felt safer in a hospital setting but were not able to access care for planned vaginal breech hospital birth, despite extensive efforts. Participants felt "backed into a corner" and "forced into homebirth," perceiving a lack of access to safe and respectful care in the hospital system. CONCLUSION Some service users believe that home birth is their only option when they cannot access hospital-based care for vaginal breech birth. Current barriers to care for breech birth limit birthing people's autonomy and may be placing them and their infants at increased risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Schafer
- Division of Advanced Nursing Practice, School of Nursing, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Mary S Dietrich
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Shelagh Mulvaney
- School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Walker S, Spillane E, Stringer K, Trepte L, Davies SM, Bresson J, Sandall J, Shennan A. OptiBreech collaborative care versus standard care for women with a breech-presenting fetus at term: A pilot parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the feasibility of a randomised trial nested within a cohort. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294139. [PMID: 37967120 PMCID: PMC10650999 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OptiBreech collaborative care is a multi-disciplinary care pathway for breech presentation at term, with continuity from a breech specialist midwife, including where chosen, for vaginal breech birth (VBB). Pilot randomised trial using unblinded 1:1 parallel group allocation to OptiBreech versus standard care, within a cohort. Participants were women with a breech-presenting fetus > 33 weeks, at four sites in England, January-June 2022. A two-stage consent process was used. Participants consented to undergo random selection to be offered a 'new care process', with a choice to accept it, or not. Primary objectives were to identify recruitment, acceptance, and attrition rates. Randomisation procedures and potential primary outcomes for a substantive study were also feasibility-tested. 68 women were randomised between January-June 2022. The consent process was acceptable to participants, but randomisation was unacceptable to women who specifically sought OptiBreech care. Two women withdrew due to concerns about sharing personal information. More women planned a VBB when randomised to OptiBreech Care (23.5% vs 0, p = .002, 95% CI = 9.3%,37.8%). Women randomised to OptiBreech care had: lower rates of cephalic presentation at birth (38.2% vs 54.5%), higher rates of vaginal birth (32.4% vs 24.2%), lower rates of in-labour caesarean birth (20.6% vs 36.4%), lower rates of neonatal intensive care (5.9% vs 9.1%), and lower rates of severe neonatal morbidity (2.9% vs 9.1%). Randomisation was stopped on the advice of the steering committee before the planned sample of 104, as lack of access to VBB within standard care prohibited comparison of outcomes. Demand for VBB is sufficient for a cohort study, but comparison of outcomes by 1:1 randomisation is not feasible. OptiBreech care would be best evaluated using stepped wedge cluster randomisation. Funded by the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR300582). Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN 14521381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Women’s and Children’s Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Spillane
- Kingston Maternity, Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Stringer
- Women’s Services, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Trepte
- Women’s and Children’s Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Siân M. Davies
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacana Bresson
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Sandall
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Shennan
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Department of Women & Children’s Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dasgupta T, Hunter S, Reid S, Sandall J, Shennan A, Davies SM, Walker S. Breech specialist midwives and clinics in the OptiBreech Trial feasibility study: An implementation process evaluation. Birth 2023; 50:596-605. [PMID: 36288483 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attendance of skilled and experienced professionals at breech births has been associated with a reduction in adverse perinatal outcomes. We aimed to determine whether United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) sites could reliably provide attendants with OptiBreech training and/or advanced proficiency (intervention feasibility) and consistent care (fidelity) that meets women's needs (acceptability), with low neonatal admission rates (safety) and recruitment adequate to support a clinical trial (trial feasibility). METHODS Mixed methods implementation evaluation was used. Settings were 13 services in England and Wales. Participants were 82 women requesting support for a vaginal breech birth (VBB) at term. Outcomes were descriptively analyzed. Twenty-one women were interviewed, and transcripts were analyzed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Iterative analysis informed subsequent interviews and the ongoing process of implementation across sites. RESULTS Although we initially suggested multidisciplinary teams, actively recruiting Trusts yielded services where VBB care was provided through a dedicated clinic, organized and delivered primarily by a lead midwife who functioned as a specialist. This model achieved 87.5% fidelity with the intervention's goal of ensuring the attendance of OptiBreech-trained professionals. Neonatal outcomes remained stable, with an admission rate of 5.5%. Women reported care from specialist midwives as highly acceptable, but the model is vulnerable without a strategic effort to develop additional proficient team members. CONCLUSIONS Dedicated clinics coordinated by specialist midwives appear to be an acceptable and feasible implementation strategy to test the safety and effectiveness of proficient team care for VBB in a clinical trial. Back-up arrangements should be maintained while additional members of the team develop proficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tisha Dasgupta
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Hunter
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Independent Lay Members of the Research Team, Peterborough, UK
| | - Sharna Reid
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Independent Lay Members of the Research Team, London, UK
| | - Jane Sandall
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Shennan
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Siân M Davies
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shawn Walker
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Women's and Children's Services, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bresson J, Christie K, Walker S. Not too fast, not too slow: A review of historical trends in vaginal breech time management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 287:216-220. [PMID: 37390754 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM A lack of consistent professional guidance on when to intervene during emergence (buttocks and anus visible at the introitus to birth of the head) in vaginal breech birth (VBB). BACKGROUND Hypoxia and asphyxia are common complications of VBB, especially due to umbilical cord compression around the time of emergence. AIM To gain insight into VBB time management trends, the evidence behind these practices and how they may have influenced outcomes. METHODS Literature review of obstetric textbooks published between 1960 and 2000 contained in the Wellcome Collection and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Library in London. FINDINGS 90 textbooks were reviewed. Recommendations for 'safe' intervals between birth of the umbilicus and the head ranged from 5 to 20 min. Many sources focused only on the time required to deliver the head, with 'up to 10 min' being the most common interval described. The review found no mention of cord compression causing concern earlier in breech births than once the umbilicus itself is delivered, nor any evidence to support the recommendations. DISCUSSION These findings demonstrate a long-term pattern across the second half of the 20th century, whereby birth attendants were urged not to rush emergence nor delay intervention but were given little clear guidance on optimal timings. CONCLUSION Clear, evidence-based guidance should be provided in breech training materials to avoid unnecessary hypoxic injuries, and this guidance should be rigorously evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacana Bresson
- Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London. 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, United Kingdom.
| | - Keelie Christie
- School of Healthcare, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
| | - Shawn Walker
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Sciences, King's College London. 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walker S, Spillane E, Stringer K, Meadowcroft A, Dasgupta T, Davies SM, Sandall J, Shennan A. The feasibility of team care for women seeking to plan a vaginal breech birth (OptiBreech 1): an observational implementation feasibility study in preparation for a pilot trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:80. [PMID: 37173798 PMCID: PMC10175899 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01299-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND OptiBreech Care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term, including where chosen, physiological breech birth attended by professionals with advanced training and/or proficiency. We aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing OptiBreech team care prior to proceeding with a planned pilot randomised controlled trial. METHODS Our design was an observational implementation feasibility assessment across England and Wales, January 2021-June 2022. Our objectives were to determine whether Trusts could provide attendants with advanced training (implementation feasibility), who deliver protocol-consistent care (fidelity), within existing resources (costs), while maintaining low neonatal admission rates (safety) and adequate recruitment rates (trial feasibility). Participants included women > 37 weeks pregnant with a breech-presenting foetus, requesting support for a vaginal breech birth following standard counselling, and staff involved in the study. No randomisation occurred in this first stage of feasibility work. RESULTS Thirteen National Health Service sites were recruited. A total of 82 women planned births in the study. Sites with a breech specialist midwife recruited at double the rate of sites without (0.90/month, 95% CI 0.64-1.16 vs 0.40, 95% CI 0.12-0.68). Referrals into the study came from midwives (46%), obstetricians (34%) and women themselves (20%). Vaginal births were attended by staff with OptiBreech training at 87.5% (35/40, 95% CI 0.732-0.958) and by staff who met additional proficiency criteria at 67.5% (27/40, 95% CI 0.509-0.814). Fidelity criteria were more consistently met by staff who also met proficiency criteria. There were four neonatal admissions (4.9%, 4/82), including one serious adverse outcome (1.2%, 1/82). CONCLUSIONS A prospective observational cohort of OptiBreech collaborative care, which could potentially support nested or cluster randomisation, appears feasible in sites willing to establish a dedicated clinic and strategically develop further proficient members of staff, with back-up plans for supporting rapidly progressing births. Randomisation procedures remain to be feasibility tested. It is funded by the NIHR (NIHR300582).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
- Women's and Children's Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Rd, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
| | - Emma Spillane
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Galsworthy Road, Surrey, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 7QB, UK
| | - Kate Stringer
- Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Surrey Hospital, Canada Avenue, Redhill, RH1 5RH, UK
| | - Amy Meadowcroft
- Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Oldham Hospital, Rochdale Road, Oldham, Greater Manchester, OL1 2JH, UK
| | - Tisha Dasgupta
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Siân M Davies
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jane Sandall
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Andrew Shennan
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roy R, Gray C, Prempeh-Bonsu CA, Walker S. What are women's experiences of seeking to plan a vaginal breech birth? A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:4. [PMID: 37881467 PMCID: PMC10593332 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13329.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Guidelines for breech management at term emphasise choice and informed decision-making. Despite this, the choice of vaginal breech birth (VBB), is not always available or accessible. We aimed to describe the experiences of women seeking a VBB as reported in primary research and to offer strategies for improving this experience that are grounded in evidence. Methods We conducted a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of the results, using grounded theory analysis methods (PROSPERO registration CRD42021262380), with literature published between January 2000 and February 2022. Seven databases were searched. Our review included literature about women with breech presentation, who sought a planned or unplanned VBB. Studies considering only experiences of alternative management (e.g. caesarean, external cephalic version), and those investigating healthcare workers' experiences were excluded. Covidence systematic review software was used for screening and quality assessment. Qualitative data were extracted using NVivo software (20.5.0). Data were analysed through an iterative process based on constant comparison methods, with an iterative and reflexive code generation process. Codes were then arranged into 'categories of experience', which gave rise to over-arching themes. Results Our review included 19 studies. We present one overarching theory: 'Women who wish to plan a vaginal breech birth seek connected autonomy'. Our schematic, depicting this theory, includes seven main categories of experience: paternalistic healthcare; emotional turmoil; judgement and self-doubt; mother vs society: refusing to conform; isolated but united by breech; welcomed direction; and supported self-determination and self-efficacy. Conclusions Women seeking to plan a VBB feel vulnerable and wish to connect with capable and confident healthcare providers. To meet their needs, services should be designed so that they can connect with clinicians who are willing and able to support their autonomy. Services should also seek to limit their exposure to disrespectful and judgemental interactions with healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritika Roy
- School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Cecilia Gray
- School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | | | - Shawn Walker
- Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
- Women and Children's Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW10 9NH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spillane E, Walker S, McCourt C. Optimal time intervals for vaginal breech births: a case-control study. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2022; 2:45. [PMID: 36811097 PMCID: PMC7614205 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13297.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Breech births are associated with a high rate of hypoxic injury, in part due to cord occlusion during emergence. Maximum time intervals and guidelines oriented toward earlier intervention have been proposed in a Physiological Breech Birth Algorithm. We wished to further test and refine the Algorithm for use in a clinical trial. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a London teaching hospital, including 15 cases and 30 controls, during the period of April 2012 to April 2020. Our sample size was powered to test the hypothesis that exceeding recommended time limits is associated with neonatal admission or death. Data collected from intrapartum care records was analysed using SPSS v26 statistical software. Variables were intervals between the stages of labour and various stages of emergence (presenting part, buttocks, pelvis, arms, head). The chi-square test and odds ratios were used to determine association between exposure to the variables of interest and composite outcome. Multiple logistic regression was used to test the predictive value of delays defined as non-adherence the Algorithm. Results Logistic regression modelling using the Algorithm time frames had an 86.8% accuracy, a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 92.3% for predicting the primary outcome. Delays between umbilicus and head >3 minutes (OR: 9.508 [95% CI: 1.390-65.046] p=0.022) and from buttocks on the perineum to head >7 minutes (OR: 6.682 [95% CI: 0.940-41.990] p=0.058) showed the most effect. Lengths of time until the first intervention were consistently longer among the cases. Delay in intervention was more common among cases than head or arm entrapment. Conclusion Emergence taking longer than the limits recommended in the Physiological Breech Birth algorithm may be predictive of adverse outcomes. Some of this delay is potentially avoidable. Improved recognition of the boundaries of normality in vaginal breech births may help improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Spillane
- Maternity Services, Kingston NHS Foundation Trust, Kingston upon Thames, London, KT2 7QB, UK
| | - Shawn Walker
- Women and Children's Health, King's College London, 10th floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
- Women and Children's Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK
| | - Christine McCourt
- Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, City, University of London, 1 Myddleton Street, London, EC1R 1UB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morris SE, Sundin D, Geraghty S. Women’s experiences of breech birth decision making: An integrated review. Eur J Midwifery 2022; 6:2. [PMID: 35118350 PMCID: PMC8784975 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/143875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Currently, caesarean section is the primary mode of birth for a breech presenting fetus, leading to a deskilling of clinicians and limitation of birth choices for women. The aim of this review is to present a synthesized summary of existing literature related to women’s experiences of breech birth mode decision-making. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was conducted in April 2021, utilizing five databases to identify and obtain peer-reviewed articles meeting the predetermined selection criteria. RESULTS Four major categories were synthesized from the integrated review: 1) Women who desire a vaginal birth may experience a range of negative emotions such as feelings of disempowerment, loss, uncertainty and a sense of isolation; 2) Women who experience a breech presentation at term experience significant pressures to conform to expectations of medical professionals and their families due to perceptions of risk related to breech birth; 3) Breech birth decision-making in a limiting system; and 4) Overall satisfaction with the decision to plan a vaginal breech birth. CONCLUSION Women with a breech presenting fetus at term experience a complex range of emotions and internal and external pressures due to perceptions of risk around breech birth. Midwives were seen as helpful throughout the breech experience. The reduced caesarean section rate for breech, observed in studies exploring specialized care pathways or dedicated services, could reduce the incidence of Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E. Morris
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
- King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Deborah Sundin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | - Sadie Geraghty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mattiolo S, Spillane E, Walker S. Physiological breech birth training: An evaluation of clinical practice changes after a one-day training program. Birth 2021; 48:558-565. [PMID: 34160107 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The "physiological breech birth" one-day training program is based on evidence about the physiology of breech births and how clinicians learn breech skills. Previous evaluations have demonstrated positive effects on confidence and knowledge, but the training's effect on clinical practice and outcomes is unknown. METHODS A mixed-methods evaluation was conducted in eight National Health Service hospitals in England and Northern Ireland. Changes in confidence and knowledge were assessed using pretraining and post-training surveys. Mode of birth and maternal birth positions were evaluated using audit data covering one year before the training and one year after, for all singleton vaginal breech births at term. FINDINGS A total of 263 participants completed the surveys. Confidence in managing breech births in both upright and supine positions significantly increased, as did participant knowledge. Audited data for 1402 women were collected. Overall vaginal birth rates remained similar in both periods. Among singleton vaginal breech births >37 weeks, the use of upright birthing positions increased significantly (P = .002). The study was not powered to detect differences in other outcomes, but pilot data were collected to inform the design of future studies. CONCLUSIONS Increase in use of upright birthing positions suggests that physiological breech birth training is likely to lead to clinical practice changes, which may help support maternal choice in line with current guidance. However, provision of a one-day training program did not change overall vaginal breech birth rates. Adequately powered research is needed to determine effects of clinical practice changes on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Mattiolo
- Women's and Children's Health, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals, Epsom, UK
| | - Emma Spillane
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kingston, UK
| | - Shawn Walker
- Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.,Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Casteels M, Podevyn K, Vanoverschelde H, Louwen F. Implementation of a breech program in a Belgian obstetric team. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 158:432-438. [PMID: 34735728 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To stimulate obstetric centers to start training in breech counseling and selection and performing vaginal breech deliveries. METHODS The different steps that were needed to roll out a breech program, are described: the "walking" epidural (PIEB protocol), the breech consultation with a structured counseling tool, and training of the whole team (gynecologists, midwives, anesthesiologists, and pediatricians). We describe below the results of 111 women who were counseled at the breech consultation, in the period May 2019 to August 2021. RESULTS In all, 86.5% of patients (n= 96) with a singleton term breech met the criteria for a vaginal breech delivery; 77% of this group (n= 74) accepted a planned vaginal breech delivery. Of this group, 54% (n=40) had a successful vaginal breech delivery, 27% (n=20) ended up in a secondary cesarean section, and 19% (n=14) had a planned cesarean section. CONCLUSION We were able to roll out a successful breech program, including vaginal breech delivery, in a safe way. The breech consultation is the most essential part of the process. Training of the whole team is mandatory. The results of the first 2 years are encouraging to continue this program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine Casteels
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kathleen Podevyn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Frank Louwen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Morris S, Geraghty S, Sundin D. Breech presentation management: A critical review of leading clinical practice guidelines. Women Birth 2021; 35:e233-e242. [PMID: 34253466 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM Clinical practice guidelines are designed to guide clinicians and consumers of maternity services in clinical decision making, but recommendations are often consensus based and differ greatly between leading organisations. BACKGROUND Breech birth is a divisive clinical issue, however vaginal breech births continue to occur despite a globally high caesarean section rate for breech presenting fetuses. Inconsistencies are known to exist between clinical practice guidelines relating to the management of breech presentation. AIM The aim of this review was to critically evaluate and compare leading obstetric clinical practice guidelines related to the management of breech presenting fetuses. METHODS Leading obstetric guidelines were purposively obtained for review. Analysis was conducted using the International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE) Guideline Quality Checklist and reviewing the content of each guideline. FINDINGS Antenatal care recommendations and indications for Caesarean Section were relatively consistent between clinical guidelines. However, several inconsistencies were found among the other recommendations in terms of birth mode counselling, intrapartum management and the basis for recommendations. DISCUSSION Inconsistencies noted in the clinical practice guidelines have the potential to cause issues related to valid consent and create confusion among clinicians and maternity consumers. CONCLUSION Clinical practice guidelines, which focus on the risks of a Vaginal Breech Birth without also discussing the risks of a Caesarean Section when a breech presentation is diagnosed, has the potential to sway clinician attitudes and impact birth mode decision-making in maternity consumers. To respect pregnant women's autonomy and fulfil the legal requirements of consent, clinicians should provide balanced counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Morris
- Edith Cowan University; King Edward Memorial Hopsital.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Morris S, Geraghty S, Sundin D. Development of a Breech-Specific Integrated Care Pathway for Pregnant Women: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e23514. [PMID: 33620329 PMCID: PMC7943339 DOI: 10.2196/23514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of an integrated care pathway with multidisciplinary input to standardize and streamline care for pregnant women experiencing breech presentation at 36 or more weeks of gestation poses several challenges because of the divisive and contentious nature of the phenomenon. Although many clinicians are interested in obtaining the skills required to safely support women desiring a vaginal breech birth, the primary trend in most health care facilities is to recommend a cesarean section. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to discuss the mixed methods approach used in a doctoral study conducted to generate new knowledge regarding women's experiences of breech birth in Western Australia and professional recommendations regarding the care of women experiencing breech presentation close to or at term. This study was designed to inform the development of an integrated care pathway for women experiencing a breech presentation. This mixed methods approach situated within the pragmatic paradigm was determined to be the optimal way for incorporating multidisciplinary recommendations with current clinical practice guidelines and consumer feedback. METHODS A mixed methods study utilizing semistructured interviews, an electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) study, and clinical practice guideline appraisal was conducted to generate new data. The interviews were designed to provide insights and understanding of the experiences of women in Western Australia who are diagnosed with a breech presentation. The e-Delphi study explored childbirth professionals' knowledge, opinions, and recommendations for the care of women experiencing breech presentation close to or at term. The clinical practice guideline appraisal will examine the current national and professional breech management and care guidelines. This study has the potential to highlight areas in practice that may need improvement and enable clinicians to better support women through what can be a difficult time. RESULTS Data collection for this study began in November 2018 and concluded in March 2020. Data analysis is currently taking place, and the results will be disseminated through publication when the analysis is complete. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study will guide the development of an integrated care pathway for women experiencing a breech presentation close to or at term, with the hope of moving toward standardized breech care for women in Western Australia. This study protocol has the potential to be used as a research framework for future studies of a similar nature. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/23514.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Morris
- King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, Australia.,Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Derisbourg S, Costa E, De Luca L, Amirgholami S, Bogne Kamdem V, Vercoutere A, Zhang WH, Alexander S, Buekens PM, Englert Y, Pintiaux A, Daelemans C. Impact of implementation of a breech clinic in a tertiary hospital. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:435. [PMID: 32727421 PMCID: PMC7391516 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03122-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of breech presentation in single pregnancies at term is between three to 5 %. In order to support eligible women in their choice of mode of delivery, a dedicated breech clinic with a care pathway was developed in December 2015 in a tertiary referral centre in Brussels. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the vaginal birth rate before and after the introduction of a dedicated breech clinic. The secondary objective was to compare the early neonatal outcomes before and after the breech clinic was introduced. METHODS This was a single centre retrospective and prospective study. The inclusion criteria were term (from 37 weeks), singleton fetus and breech presentation at delivery. The exclusion criteria were suspected intrauterine growth restriction, severe fetal malformations and intrauterine fetal demise. We used a composite outcome as an indicator of neonatal morbidity and mortality. RESULTS After the introduction of the breech clinic, we observed a significant increase in planned vaginal delivery from 7.4% (12/162) to 53.0% (61/115) (OR: 13.5; 95% CI: 6.7-27.0). The effective vaginal breech delivery rate (planned and unexpected) significantly increased from 4.3% (7/162) pre-implementation of breech clinic to 43.5% (50/115) post-implementation (OR: 17.0; 95% CI: 7.3-39.6). Neonatal outcomes were not statistically different between the before and after periods. CONCLUSION The introduction of a dedicated breech clinic has led to an increase in vaginal deliveries for breech babies without adversely affecting neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Derisbourg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium.
| | - E Costa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - L De Luca
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - S Amirgholami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - V Bogne Kamdem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - A Vercoutere
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - W H Zhang
- Research Laboratory for Human Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, CP 597, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - S Alexander
- Perinatal Epidemiology and Reproductive Health Unit, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research Centre, Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - P M Buekens
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Y Englert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
- Research Laboratory for Human Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, CP 597, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - A Pintiaux
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - C Daelemans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, B-1070, Bruxelles, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Attitudes towards breech management among a team of maternity clinicians in Australia undertaking breech training. Women Birth 2020; 33:e348-e356. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
15
|
Walker S, Spillane E. Face-to-pubes rotational maneuver for bilateral nuchal arms in a vaginal breech birth, resolved in an upright maternal position: A case report. Birth 2020; 47:246-252. [PMID: 32128883 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A physiological breech birth is one in which the woman is encouraged to remain active throughout her labor and able to assume the position of her choice for the birth. Use of this strategy within the United Kingdom National Health Service has led to the use of innovative maneuvers to relieve obstruction when women give birth in upright positions, for example, kneeling or standing. This includes use of the face-to-pubes rotational maneuver to relieve extended nuchal arm(s). In this paper, we report a case where the face-to-pubes rotational maneuver was used to relieve bilateral nuchal arm entrapment in a breech birth. METHODS Single-case study. We aimed to generate an in-depth understanding of how this maneuver works and how professionals decide to use it by exploring its use in a real-life context. RESULTS The face-to-pubes rotational maneuver appears to be an effective method of relieving nuchal arm entrapment when used by experienced hands. In cases of bilateral nuchal arm entrapment, elevation to a higher station may be necessary to dis-impact the arms above the pelvic inlet before the fetus can be rotated. After face-to-pubes rotation and release of arms, the head should be realigned in an occiput anterior position for delivery. CONCLUSION The face-to-pubes rotational maneuver can be taught for resolution of nuchal arms in an upright position. Parents should be informed of the availability or not of a specialist midwife trained in physiological breech birth, as this may be important to their decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.,Consultant Breech Specialist Midwife, Women's and Children's Services, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Emma Spillane
- Birth Centre Lead and Breech Specialist Midwife, Maternity Services, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Leeman L. State of the breech in 2020: Guidelines support maternal choice, but skills are lost…. Birth 2020; 47:165-168. [PMID: 32128861 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Leeman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Emma Spillane believes midwives and obstetricians need to acquire more skills and knowledge on breech birth—here's why
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Spillane
- Lead midwife for birth centre, continuity and breech service, St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; co-director and training co-ordinator, Breech Birth Network, CIC
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
What if something goes wrong? A grounded theory study of parents’ decision-making processes around mode of breech birth at term gestation. Midwifery 2019; 78:114-122. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
19
|
Walker S, Batinelli L, Rocca-Ihenacho L, McCourt C. 'Keeping birth normal': Exploratory evaluation of a training package for midwives in an inner-city, alongside midwifery unit. Midwifery 2018; 60:1-8. [PMID: 29454244 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES to gain understanding about how participants perceived the value and effectiveness of 'Keeping Birth Normal' training, barriers to implementing it in an along-side midwifery unit, and how the training might be enhanced in future iterations. DESIGN exploratory interpretive. SETTING inner-city maternity service. PARTICIPANTS 31 midwives attending a one-day training package on one of three occasions. METHODS data were collected using semi-structured observation of the training, a short feedback form (23/31 participants), and focus groups (28/31 participants). Feedback form data were analysed using summative content analysis, following which all data sets were pooled and thematically analysed using a template agreed by the researchers. FINDINGS We identified six themes contributing to the workshop's effectiveness as perceived by participants. Three related to the workshop design: (1) balanced content, (2) sharing stories and strategies and (3) 'less is more.' And three related to the workshop leaders: (4) inspiration and influence, (5) cultural safety and (6) managing expectations. Cultural focus on risk and low prioritisation of normal birth were identified as barriers to implementing evidence-based practice supporting normal birth. Building a community of practice and the role of consultant midwives were identified as potential opportunities. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE a review of evidence, local statistics and practical skills using active educational approaches was important to this training. Two factors not directly related to content appeared equally important: catalysing a community of practice and the perceived power of workshop leaders to influence organisational systems limiting the agency of individual midwives. Cyclic, interactive training involving consultant midwives, senior midwives and the multidisciplinary team may be recommended to be most effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Laura Batinelli
- City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho
- City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christine McCourt
- City, University of London, Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|