New GRAPPA recommendations for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: process, challenges and implementation

Evaluating upadacitinib for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis is an extra-cutaneous manifestation affecting up to 40% of psoriasis patients with multiple therapies recommended by international guidelines including conventional and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as well as biologics. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have emerged as a unique therapeutic target with tofacitinib the first to gain FDA approval in 2017. The non-selectivity of older JAKis increases the risk of off-target effects such as suppression of hemopoiesis hence the rationale for more selective alternatives.

AREAS COVERED

This paper explores the use of upadacitinib (a selective JAK1 inhibitor) for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. It covers its chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety and regulation.

EXPERT OPINION

In our opinion, upadacitinib is set to play an important role in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis as demonstrated by the SELECT-PsA trials especially in patients with poor or non-response to current first-line therapies. It's JAK1 receptor selectivity promises a lower side effect profile compared to the older nonselective JAKis but this will require confirmation with long-term clinical trial data.

Therapiestrategien der Psoriasisarthritis

Bestehende Therapieempfehlungen und deren Limitationen In den letzten Jahren haben sich die Basistherapieoptionen für die Behandlung der Psoriasisarthritis deutlich erweitert. Das Sicherheitsprofil der verfügbaren Therapien ist gut untersucht und für die verschiedenen Präparate bekannt. Verschiedene Empfehlungen zur Auswahl und Steuerung der geeigneten Therapie stehen dem Behandler zur Verfügung. Hierbei finden die Empfehlungen der European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) und der Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) national und international in der Routine Anwendung.

Zugelassene Therapieoptionen zur Behandlung der Psoriasisarthritis csDMARD-Therapien haben im Vergleich zur RA in der PsA-Behandlung eine schlechte Evidenzlage. Für neue Substanzen in den Kategorien tsDMARD und bDMARD liegen höhere Evidenzniveaus vor. Da neue Therapien unterschiedliche Zielstrukturen adressieren, bieten sich zunehmend Chancen der personalisierten und individualisierten Therapieentscheidung. Gerade neue pathophysiologische Erkenntnisse zum Erkrankungsbild und die daraus resultierenden Therapieoptionen, die gezielt spezifische Targets adressieren, bieten Möglichkeiten einer immer differenzierteren und individualisierten medikamentösen Behandlung zur Verbesserung der Versorgung der PsA-Patienten, v. a. mit Fokus auf personalisierte Strategien zur optimalen Behandlung verschiedener Manifestationsformen und -muster.

Randomisierte kontrollierte Studien und deren Relevanz für den Versorgungsalltag Studienendpunkte randomisierter kontrollierter Studien, deren Studiendesign oft aus der rheumatoiden Arthritis entliehen ist, dienen auch aufgrund der großen Heterogenität der Erkrankung kaum als Basis für individuelle Therapieentscheidungen. Ein mehrschrittiges Vorgehen bei der Auswahl eines individualisierten Behandlungsregimes ist wichtig unter Berücksichtigung der klinischen Manifestation, potenzieller Begleiterkrankungen, von Langzeitsicherheitsaspekten, Kontraindikationen, Applikationsformen und nicht zuletzt des Patientenwunschs.

Beneficial Effects of Apremilast on Genital Ulcers, Skin Lesions, and Arthritis in Patients With Behçet's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the clinical efficacy of apremilast for oral ulcers, extra-oral manifestations, and overall disease activity in patients with Behçet's disease (BD).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies assessing the treatment effects of apremilast in BD were included. The odds ratios (ORs) of being symptom free for individual manifestations and mean difference (MD) of Behçet's Disease Current Activity Form (BDCAF) scores were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at 12 and 24 weeks using a random-model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 259 screened articles, eight were included. After 12 weeks of apremilast treatment the OR of symptom-free was as followings: oral ulcers, 45.76 (95% CI, 13.23-158.31); genital ulcers, 4.56 (95% CI, 2.47-8.44); erythema nodosum, 3.59 (95% CI, 1.11-11.61); pseudofolliculitis, 2.81 (95% CI, 1.29-6.15); and arthritis, 3.55 (95% CI, 1.71-7.40). Furthermore, BDCAF scores at 12 weeks were significantly reduced (MD=-1.38; -1.78 to -0.99). However, the proportion of oral-ulcer free patients increased at 24 weeks (OR=14.88; 4.81 to 46.07).

CONCLUSION

The currently accumulated data indicates an improvement in mucocutaneous and articular symptoms by short-term apremilast treatment in patients with BD.

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, 52-week phase IIb study

Objectives

To evaluate efficacy and safety of the anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody tildrakizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb study, patients with active PsA were randomised 1:1:1:1:1 to tildrakizumab 200 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); tildrakizumab 200, 100 or 20 mg Q12W; or placebo Q4W. Patients receiving tildrakizumab 20 mg or placebo switched to tildrakizumab 200 mg Q12W at W24; treatment continued to W52. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients with ACR20 response (≥20% improvement by American College of Rheumatology criteria) at W24. Secondary efficacy endpoints were assessed without adjustment for multiplicity. Safety was evaluated from treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results

391/500 patients screened were randomised and treated. At W24, 71.4%–79.5% of tildrakizumab-treated versus 50.6% of placebo-treated patients achieved ACR20 (all p<0.01). Patients receiving tildrakizumab versus placebo generally achieved higher rates of ACR50, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C reactive protein <3.2, minimal disease activity and 75%/90%/100% improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index responses at W24 and through W52. Improvement in dactylitis and enthesitis was not observed; results were mixed for other outcomes. Responses in patients switched to tildrakizumab 200 mg at W24 were consistent with treatment from baseline. TEAEs and serious TEAEs occurred in 64.5% and 3.3%, respectively, of all patients through W52 and were comparable among treatment arms.

Conclusions

Tildrakizumab treatment significantly improved joint and skin manifestations of PsA other than dactylitis and enthesitis. Treatment was generally well tolerated through W52. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02980692.

Axial Psoriatic Arthritis: A Distinct Clinical Entity in Search of a Definition

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis is a well-recognized manifestation with a prevalence between 12.5% and 78%. This huge heterogeneity is due to the different criteria used by authors to define psoriatic arthritis with axial involvement combining clinical features with radiographic evidence of disease. Specific genetic and clinical attributes of axial psoriatic arthritis might differentiate it from axial spondyloarthritis with concurrent skin psoriasis. Few studies address the specific management. The purpose of this review is to acknowledge the current understanding of axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis and highlight the need for a definition to facilitate research and clinical recognition.

[Treatment of psoriatic arthritis : Are there differential indications?]

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a very heterogeneous immune-mediated disease that usually involves skin and joints but can also affect entheses and extra-articular structures during the disease course. Furthermore, it can also be linked with other associated diseases. Therefore, the individualized selection of an effective and patient-oriented treatment must be carried out taking the extent of various manifestations of the PsA itself and also of other influencing factors into consideration. Various recommendations for selection and control of the suitable treatment of PsA are available for clinical use. The recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) are the two recommendations that are frequently used and internationally acknowledged. Both recommendations were updated in 2016. Specific German treatment recommendations are currently missing. In analogy to the treat-to-target strategy for rheumatoid arthritis, at least minimal disease activity (MDA) should be achieved in PsA patients with the use of specific therapeutic interventions if remission as the maximum therapeutic goal cannot be reached. New treatment options, which target different specific molecules, offer possibilities for a more differentiated personalized medicinal treatment for improvement of the care of PsA patients. This particularly applies to a focus on personalized strategies for optimal treatment of various manifestation forms and patterns.

Long-term efficacy and safety of netakimab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Results of phase II open-label extension clinical study BCD-085-2-ext

Netakimabis original monoclonal antibody against IL-17. This article outlines the key results of a phase II open-label extension trial of netakimab 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

The main aim of the trial is to estimate efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of long-term treatment with netakimab 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Materials and methods. The BCD-085-2-ext study is a comparative, open-label phase 2 clinical study of the effi - cacy and safety of netakimab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had finished BCD-085-2 (NCT02762994) trial. Main efficacy endpoints includePASI75, PASI90, PASI100, sPGA = 0–1 on week 38 of the trial, long-term PASI75/90/100 retention, efficacy keeping after switch from once every 2 week regimen to once every 4 week regimen. Safety endpoints include adverse events, serious adverse events number and their profile.

Results. 103 patients were included. PASI75 at week 38 was reached by 98.06 %, PASI90 — by 92.23 %, PASI100 — by 59.22 % of patients. There were no cases of serious adverse event, early with drawal due to adverse events and cases of grade 4 toxicity according to CTCAE 4.03. There were no cases of binding antibodies to netakimab during the 38 weeks of the study.

Conclusion. The first Russian original IL-17 inhibitor netakimabis promising modern medicine for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treatment. Netakimabshowed high efficacy, favorable safety profile and low immunogenicity during one year of the treatment.

Netakimab — new IL-17а inhibitor: 12-week results of phase III clinical study BCD-085-7/PLANETA in patients with moderate-tosevere plaque psoriasis

Netakimab, the original monoclonal antibody against IL-17A, is an innovative drug for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in patients who have indications for systemic therapy or phototherapy. Netakimab was approved in Russian Federation, registration certificate number ЛП-005439 from 04.04.2019. This article outlines the first 12-week results of a phase III clinical trial in patients with psoriasis.

Materials and methods. The BCD-085-7 study (PLANETA) is a comparative, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical study of the efficacy and safety of netakimab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. This review presents the results of the first 12 weeks. The study is ongoing at the moment, the total duration of treatment for each patient is 3 years (154 weeks). Patients were randomized in a ratio of 2:2:1 into one of three arms: group 1 received netakimab subcutaneously at a dose of 120 mg once a week for the first three weeks (induction) and then once every 2 weeks up to week 10, group 2 received netakimab subcutaneously at a dose of 120 mg once a week for the first three weeks (induction) and then once every 4 weeks up to week 10, group 3 received a placebo subcutaneously on day 1 at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 10. In order to maintain a double-blind design, placebo was administered to patients in group 2 at weeks 4 and 8.

Results. Both netakimab groups showed a significant superiority over placebo (p < 0.001) and the absence of statistically significant differences between the two regimens of therapy (p > 0.05) across all endpoints. PASI 75 at week 12 was reached by 77.65 % of patients using netakimab once every 2 weeks and 83.33 % of patients using netakimab once every 4 weeks (ITT population). The rate of clear and almost clear skin (sPGA 0–1) was reached by 81.18 and 79.76 % of patients using netakimab once every 2 weeks and once every 4 weeks, respectively. The safety assessment showed no statistically significant differences between the groups, the incidence rate of adverse events in netakimab arms was not higher than in the placebo arm. There were no cases of early withdrawal due to adverse events and cases of grade 4 toxicity according to CTCAE 4.03. During the 12 weeks of the study, one serious adverse event was registered in group 2 (pneumonia grade 3), which was recovered without any consequences. The immunogenicity assessment showed binding antibodies formation at week 12 in one patient who received BCD-085 every 2 weeks. Neutralizing antibodies were not detected. Conclusion. Netakimab showed high efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis, more than 80 % of patients achieved PASI 75 and sPGA 0–1 (clear and almost clear skin) by the week 12 of treatment. The drug showed a favorable safety profile and low immunogenicity. Based on the study results the regimen once a week during the first 3 weeks (induction), then once every 4 weeks was chosen for medical use in patients with psoriasis.

Tofacitinib for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are inflammatory immune-mediated conditions which can cause considerable disability and reduced quality of life. Management can be complex as clinical heterogeneity may lead to different treatment pathways. Tofacitinib is a novel, oral Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor with proven efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. Areas covered: This review analyzes recent studies of tofacitinib in psoriatic disease treatment. The relevant literature was identified using clinicaltrials.gov, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Tofacitinib efficacy was demonstrated in PsA by the OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond phase-III studies, and received FDA and EMA approval. Tofacitinib was superior to placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the OPT Pivotal 1 and 2, OPT Retreatment studies, but FDA approval was declined for this indication based on issues of clinical efficacy and long-term safety. Expert commentary: Tofacitinib is an important oral drug for the treatment of PsA. However, the long-term safety data require further evaluation. Tofacitinib and other JAK inhibitors show potential to broaden the treatment options in PsA and other inflammatory conditions.

Cross-sectional multicenter observational study of psoriatic arthritis in Japanese patients: Relationship between skin and joint symptoms and results of treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis with as yet unclear pathophysiology. This retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in 19 facilities in western Japan and aimed to identify patients' characteristics and factors that affect the results of treatment with biologic agents. Of 2116 patients with psoriasis, 285 (13.5%) had PsA. Skin manifestations preceded joint manifestations in 69.8%, the onset was simultaneous in 17.2%, whereas PsA preceded skin manifestations in 2.5%. Peripheral arthritis was most common, occurring in 73.7%, compared with axial disease in 21.8%, enthesitis in 23.5% and dactylitis in 35.4%. Patients with severe skin manifestations were significantly younger at onset (P = 0.02) and more frequently had axial disease (P < 0.01). Biologic agents were used in 206 patients (72.3%), anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antibodies being prescribed first to 157 of them. Anti-TNF-α antibodies were continued by 105 participants and discontinued by 47, the remaining five patients being lost to follow up. Patients who discontinued anti-TNF-α antibodies were significantly older than those who continued (55 vs 51 years, P = 0.04) and significantly older at onset of joint manifestations (50 vs 44 years, P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients over 50 years significantly more frequently terminated anti-TNF-α antibodies (P < 0.01). In conclusion, patients with PsA and severe skin manifestations have earlier onset and axial disease, which seriously impacts on quality of life. Anti-TNF-α antibodies were generally effective enough to continue but less so in patients aged over 50 years. Further detailed research is needed.

Secukinumab for psoriatic arthritis: comparative effectiveness versus licensed biologics/apremilast: a network meta-analysis

AIM

A network meta-analysis using randomized controlled trial data compared psoriatic arthritis (PsA) outcomes (American College of Rheumatology [ACR], Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] and Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria [PsARC] response rates) at 12-16 weeks for secukinumab, adalimumab, apremilast, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab and ustekinumab.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Trials were identified by systematic review. Separate networks were developed for the full-study populations, biologic-naive patients and biologic-experienced patients.

RESULTS

In the full populations, secukinumab, adalimumab, golimumab and infliximab demonstrated the highest ACR response rates. Secukinumab and infliximab demonstrated the highest PASI response rates, and infliximab and etanercept demonstrated the highest PsARC response rates.

CONCLUSION

In the full populations, secukinumab demonstrated good efficacy across all outcomes. All treatments for active PsA included in this comprehensive network meta-analysis demonstrated superiority to placebo.

Liver Illness and Psoriatic Patients

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin affecting approximately 2% of the world's population. Systemic treatments, including methotrexate and cyclosporin, are associated with potential hepatotoxicity, due to either direct liver damage or immunosuppression or both immunomediated and a direct liver injury; therefore, treatment of patients with psoriasis poses a therapeutic challenge. The aim of this minireview is to help clinicians in the management of psoriatic patients who develop signs of liver dysfunction. To find relevant articles, a comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane with appropriate combinations of the following keywords being considered: viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, psoriasis, hepatotoxicity, drug toxicity, cholestasis, and autoimmune liver diseases.

[Therapy of Psoriasis Arthritis Taking into Account New Treatment Options]

Therapy of Psoriasis Arthritis Taking into Account New Treatment Options Abstract. Psoriatic arthritis occurs in about 20-30 % of patients with psoriasis. The disease is heterogeneous and can involve a variety of the distinct anatomical sites. The choice of medication depends on the type and the severity of clinical features. The recommendations of EULAR and GRAPPA serve as a guide for the choice of medication, which is used in sequential treatment steps. This is presented in our review in usable, simplified terms. Potential comorbidities leading to contraindication for certain treatments are considered. We present new and highly effective treatments, based on the pathogenesis of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, targeting the IL-23/IL-17 pathway.

Rebound in Measures of Disease Activity and Symptoms in Corrona Registry Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Who Discontinue Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy after Achieving Low Disease Activity

OBJECTIVE

Rebound may occur in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who discontinue TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy in low disease activity (LDA).

METHODS

Using physician and patient reports, we quantified rebound following TNFi discontinuation [defined as Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score > 10 or TNFi restart] and time to rebound in adults with PsA in LDA (CDAI score ≤ 10) at TNFi discontinuation.

RESULTS

Rebound occurred in 73% (69/94) of patients soon after discontinuation (median time to rebound 8.0 mos, 95% CI 6.0-12.0).

CONCLUSION

Rebound occurred frequently in patients with PsA after TNFi discontinuation. TNFi discontinuation after achieving LDA should be carefully considered.

A Review of the Use of Secukinumab for Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, seronegative spondyloarthropathy associated with psoriasis (PsO). Treatment options range from non-pharmacologic measures to NSAIDS, DMARDs, and biologics, depending on patient presentation. Secukinumab (Cosentyx©) is a new biologic treatment option that was approved for use in treating adult patients with PsA in October 2016. Our paper explores the clinical trial evidence available for secukinumab to examine its safety and efficacy as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of PsA. While indirect comparisons of indicate that secukinumab is as effective as other treatment options, further studies directly comparing available treatments will be necessary to establish its place in treatment guidelines. As these and other trials are conducted, the evidence produced will further elucidate the clinical potential of secukinumab as a treatment option for patients with rheumatologic disease.

Incorporating the patient's perspective in outcomes research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Incorporation of the patients' perspective in clinical research is critical to ensure that outcomes measured reflect those, which matter most to patients. This review summarizes recent efforts to include the patients' perspective in the development of outcome measures and the importance of encouraging patient participation in decision-making and self-management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the inclusion of fatigue as a patient-endorsed core outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) trials, OMERACT has been instrumental in advocating for patient involvement in the development of core domains and instruments; current endeavors include cultivating an understanding of remission through the eyes of patients and gaining a sense of how to measure features of pain and 'stiffness' deemed as important to patients. The concept of remission was further explored in RA patients, highlighting a common goal of returning to normality; additionally, various tools have been developed to assess for unmet needs in rheumatology patients. Advances have also been made in the development and revision of patient-centered core measures in rheumatologic diagnoses outside of RA.

SUMMARY

Incorporating the patients' perspective is now considered an essential feature in outcomes research. Future research should focus on how best to involve patients in specific research activities.

[Psoriatic arthritis : Current therapeutic standards]

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous immune-mediated disease that usually involves the skin and joints but can also affect the entheses, spine and other extra-articular structures. Furthermore, it can be coupled with associated comorbidities. The selection of a patient-oriented and effective therapy is based on the extent of various manifestations of the disease as well as further influencing factors. Various recommendations for selection and control are available for deciding on a suitable treatment. The recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) are most frequently used and are internationally acknowledged. Both recommendations were updated in 2016. German treatment recommendations are currently lacking. In analogy to the treat-to-target strategy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, minimal disease activity should at least be achieved with the therapeutic intervention used if remission as the therapeutic target cannot be reached. New treatment options, which target different molecules, provide possibilities for a more differentiated therapy for improvement in the treatment of PsA patients.

Prologue: 2016 Annual Meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)

The 2016 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) was held in Miami, Florida, USA, and attended by rheumatologists, dermatologists, and representatives of biopharmaceutical companies and patient groups. As in previous years, GRAPPA members held a symposium for trainees to discuss their research in psoriatic disease with experts in the field. A strategic planning session was convened by the Steering Committee this year to review the work of GRAPPA since its inception in 2003. Other subjects featured during the annual meeting included a partnership with KPMG LLP (UK) to conduct interviews at research centers worldwide to analyze the process of care in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA); a discussion of the effects of interleukin 17–related pathways on the skin and joints in psoriasis and PsA; summaries of recently published treatment recommendations and related guides; 4 separate discussions of psoriasis patient examinations; updates from working groups in the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and the International Dermatology Outcome Measures; a discussion of patient centricity from GRAPPA’s patient research partners; and an update of research and educational projects from GRAPPA. In this prologue, we introduce the papers that summarize that meeting.

Incorporating the patient's perspective in outcomes research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Incorporation of the patients' perspective in clinical research is critical to ensure that outcomes measured reflect those, which matter most to patients. This review summarizes recent efforts to include the patients' perspective in the development of outcome measures and the importance of encouraging patient participation in decision-making and self-management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the inclusion of fatigue as a patient-endorsed core outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) trials, OMERACT has been instrumental in advocating for patient involvement in the development of core domains and instruments; current endeavors include cultivating an understanding of remission through the eyes of patients and gaining a sense of how to measure features of pain and 'stiffness' deemed as important to patients. The concept of remission was further explored in RA patients, highlighting a common goal of returning to normality; additionally, various tools have been developed to assess for unmet needs in rheumatology patients. Advances have also been made in the development and revision of patient-centered core measures in rheumatologic diagnoses outside of RA.

SUMMARY

Incorporating the patients' perspective is now considered an essential feature in outcomes research. Future research should focus on how best to involve patients in specific research activities.