What do Vitiligo Impact Scale‐22 scores mean? Studying the clinical interpretation of scores using an anchor‐based approach

'Substantial clinical benefit' and 'substantial clinical worsening' cutoff of Vitiligo Impact Scale (VIS)-22 change scores

Patient-centric outcome measures focus on clinically meaningful change in various aspects of disease, including severity, quality of life and psychological distress. The minimal important change (MIC) is a commonly used threshold of patient-reported outcome measures, representing the smallest difference that is considered significant by the patient and/or physician. However, it has been suggested that MIC is too low a bar for determining treatment success, and alternative thresholds such as substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) may be preferred.

Impact of Vitiligo on Quality of Life in Patients of Skin of Color and Its Correlation With Clinical Severity Assessment Scores Utilizing Disease Specific Scores: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of disease severity of vitiligo is exigent as it is a psychosomatic ailment. VIDA (vitiligo disease activity score) and VASI (vitiligo area severity index) were previously used for this evaluation. Recently, the introduction of two vitiligo specific tools, vitiligo impact scale (VIS)-22 and Vitiligo Quality of Life Index (VitiQoL) has aided in assessing the quality of life (QOL) in a pertinent manner.

OBJECTIVES

To measure the QOL in vitiligo using disease specific indices (VitiQoL and VIS-22), to assess their relationship with disease severity (VASI and VIDA) and to determine the correlation between QOL scores (VIS-22 and VitiQoL).

METHODS

This observational cross-sectional study included 195 patients with vitiligo, and their disease severity was calculated using VASI and VIDA scoring. Patients were asked to fill questionnaires for assessing the QOL using validated tools i.e. VIS-22 and VitiQoL.

RESULTS

Significant correlation was demonstrated between both QOL scores and VASI score (P value 0.001) with slightly higher values for VitiQoL (r = 0.824) than with VIS 22 (r = 0.693). Both scores exhibited a significant association with VIDA score (P value < 0.001). Moreover, statistically significant correlation was found between VIS-22 and VitiQoL, thereby proving the concordance between these scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The study infers that QOL seemed to be remarkably dependent on the clinical severity scores and that higher disease activity corresponds to poorer QOL. It is imperative to precisely assess burden of vitiligo and the impairments caused by it in order to aid multi-modality management and allow more standardized research.

cNF-Skindex in Adults Living with Neurofibromatosis 1: Severity Strata in France and Validation in United States Adults

Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) contribute to the impairment of QOL in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. The cNF-Skindex, validated in a French population, specifically assesses the cNF-related QOL. In this study, we first defined severity strata using an anchoring approach on the basis of patient's burden. In total, 209 patients answered the anchor question and the cNF-Skindex. We tested the agreement among the three strata, generated by all potential couples of cut-off values of the cNF-Skindex and the three strata defined in the anchor question. The cut-off values 12 and 49 provided the highest Kappa value (κ = 0.685, 95% confidence interval = 0.604-0.765). Second, we validated the score and the strata in a United States population using the answers provided by 220 French and 148 United States adults. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, the country of origin was not a factor associated with the score (P = 0.297). The number of cNF along the different severity strata was similar between the French and the United States populations. In conclusion, stratification constitutes a powerful tool to better interpret the cNF-Skindex in daily practice and in clinical trials. This study validates its use in two populations that together constitute a large cohort of patients willing to participate in clinical research.

Meaning of Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16) severity score bands: a cross-sectional online study in the UK

OBJECTIVE

To assign clinical meanings to the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16) scores through the development of score bands using the anchor-based approach.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional online study recruited participants through UK-based patient support groups, research support platforms (HealthWise Wales, Autism Research Centre-Cambridge University database, Join Dementia Research) and through social service departments in Wales.

PARTICIPANTS

Family members/partners (aged ≥18 years) of patients with different health conditions.

INTERVENTION

Family members/partners of patients completed the FROM-16 questionnaire and a Global Question (GQ).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Various FROM-16 band sets were devised as a result of mapping of mean, median and mode of the GQ scores to FROM-16 total score, and receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve cut-off values. The band set with the best agreement with GQ based on weighted kappa was selected.

RESULTS

A total of 4413 family members/partners (male=1533, 34.7%; female=2858, 64.8%; Prefer not to say=16, 0.4%; other=6, 0.14%) of people with a health condition (male=1994, 45.2%; female=2400, 54.4%; Prefer not to say=12, 0.3%; other=7, 0.16%) completed the online survey: mean FROM-16 score=15.02 (range 0-32, SD=8.08), mean GQ score=2.32 (range 0-4, SD=1.08). The proposed FROM-16 score bandings are: 0-1=no effect on the quality of life of family member; 2-8=small effect on family member; 9-16=moderate effect on family member; 17-25=very large effect on family member; 26-32=extremely large effect on family member (weighted kappa=0.60).

CONCLUSION

The FROM-16 score descriptor bands provide new information to clinicians about interpreting scores and score changes, allowing better-informed treatment decisions for patients and their families. The score banding of FROM-16, along with a short administration time, demonstrates its potential to support holistic clinical practice.

Quality of life measurement in vitiligo. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes with external experts

Members of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient Oriented Outcomes reviewed the instruments available for health-related (HR) QoL assessment in vitiligo and together with external vitiligo experts (including representatives of the EADV Vitiligo Task Force) have made practical recommendations concerning the assessment of QoL in vitiligo patients. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was the most frequently used HRQoL instrument, making comparison of results between different countries possible. Several vitiligo-specific instruments were identified. The vitiligo Impact Scale (VIS) is an extensively validated vitiligo-specific HRQoL instrument with proposed minimal important change and clinical interpretation for VIS-22 scores. VIS-22 was developed for use in India, where there are some specific cultural beliefs concerning vitiligo. The EADV Task Force on QoL and Patient Oriented Outcomes recommends use of the DLQI and the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) as dermatology-specific instruments in vitiligo. There is a strong need for a valid (including cross-cultural validation) vitiligo-specific instrument that can be either a new instrument or the improvement of existing instruments. This validation must include the proof of responsiveness.

The humanistic burden of vitiligo: a systematic literature review of quality-of-life outcomes

Despite historical mischaracterization as a cosmetic condition, patients with the autoimmune disorder vitiligo experience substantial quality-of-life (QoL) burden. This systematic literature review of peer-reviewed observational and interventional studies describes comprehensive evidence for humanistic burden in patients with vitiligo. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane databases were searched through February 10, 2021, to qualitatively assess QoL in vitiligo. Two independent reviewers assessed articles for inclusion and extracted data for qualitative synthesis. A total of 130 included studies were published between 1996 and 2021. Geographical regions with the most studies were Europe (32.3%) and the Middle East (26.9%). Dermatology-specific instruments, including the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; 80 studies) and its variants for children (CDLQI; 10 studies) and families (FDLQI; 4 studies), as well as Skindex instruments (Skindex-29, 15 studies; Skindex-16, 4 studies), were most commonly used to measure humanistic burden. Vitiligo-specific instruments, including the Vitiligo-specific QoL (VitiQoL; 11 studies) instrument and 22-item Vitiligo Impact Scale (VIS-22; 4 studies), were administered in fewer studies. Among studies that reported total scores for the overall population, a majority revealed moderate or worse effects of vitiligo on patient QoL (DLQI, 35/54 studies; Skindex, 8/8 studies; VitiQoL, 6/6 studies; VIS-22, 3/3 studies). Vitiligo also had a significant impact on the QoL of families and caregivers; 4/4 studies reporting FDLQI scores indicated moderate or worse effects on QoL. In general, treatment significantly (P < 0.05) improved QoL, but there were no trends for types or duration of treatment. Among studies that reported factors significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with reduced QoL, female sex and visible lesions and/or lesions in sensitive areas were most common. In summary, vitiligo has clinically meaningful effects on the QoL of patients, highlighting that greater attention should be dedicated to QoL decrement awareness and improvement in patients with vitiligo.

Evaluation of the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms in Patients with Vitiligo in China

Background

Vitiligo is a common, acquired depigmenting disorder. The pathogenesis is not clear, neuropsychological factors may be involved. Vitiligo will affect the individual’s physical and psychological health, leading to different levels of psychological behavior problems. However, there are few research on psychological symptoms in patients with vitiligo in China.

Methods

Adult patients with vitiligo were selected in convenient sampling method from March 2019 to November 2019 from the dermatology clinic. They were evaluated by the DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index), SCL-90 (Symptom Checklist-90), SADS (Social Avoidance and Distress Scale) and MCMQ (Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire).

Results

The DLQI score was 7.56 ± 6.11, which was in the third level. The SCL-90 score of patients with vitiligo was 136.44 ± 39.19, significantly higher than the Chinese norms (P < 0.05), and it mainly manifested as interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety and phobia, which may be affected by the patient’s gender, marital status, severity of disease, stage and location of skin lesions. The total score of SADS in patients was 10.30 ± 6.38. The total score and scores in all dimensions of SADS were significantly higher than the Chinese norms (all P < 0.05), which were related with the patient’s gender, educational attainment, severity, type and stage of skin lesions. For MCMQ, the facing score was significantly lower than the Chinese norms (P < 0.05), and the avoiding and yielding scores were significantly higher than the Chinese norms (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In China, vitiligo affects the patient’s quality of life to varying degrees, resulting in a series of psychological and behavioral problems. We should actively concern and improve the psychological health status and behavior of patients, and multidisciplinary treatment strategies and education about vitiligo should be given to the patients.

Psychosocial burden of lichen planus pigmentosus is similar to vitiligo, but greater than melasma: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary-care center in north India

BACKGROUND

Lichen planus pigmentosus can have a negative impact on the quality of life; however, this has not been studied in detail.

OBJECTIVES

To study the quality of life in patients with lichen planus pigmentosus and compare it with patients with vitiligo and melasma.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary-care center in north India from January 2018 to May 2019. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with lichen planus pigmentosus (n = 125), vitiligo (n = 113) and melasma (n = 121) completed the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire and answered a global question on the effect of disease on their lives. In addition, patients with vitiligo completed the Vitiligo Impact Scale (VIS)-22 questionnaire, while those with lichen planus pigmentosus and melasma filled a modified version of VIS-22.

RESULTS

The mean DLQI scores in patients with lichen planus pigmentosus, vitiligo and melasma were 10.9 ± 5.95, 9.73 ± 6.51 and 8.39 ± 5.92, respectively, the difference being statistically significant only between lichen planus pigmentosus and melasma (P < 0.001). The corresponding mean modified VIS-22/VIS-22 scores were 26.82 ± 11.89, 25.82 ± 14.03 and 18.87 ± 11.84, respectively. This difference was statistically significant between lichen planus pigmentosus and melasma, and between vitiligo and melasma (P < 0.001 for both). As compared to vitiligo, patients with lichen planus pigmentosus had a significantly greater impact on "symptoms and feelings" domain (P < 0.001) on DLQI, and on "social interactions" (P = 0.02) and "depression" (P = 0.04) domains on VIS-22. As compared to melasma, patients with lichen planus pigmentosus had significantly higher scores for "symptoms and feelings," "daily activities," "leisure" and "work and school" domains of DLQI, and all domains of VIS-22. Female gender was more associated with impairment in quality of life in patients with lichen planus pigmentosus, while lower education, marriage, younger age and increasing disease duration showed a directional trend.

LIMITATIONS

Use of DLQI and modified version of VIS-22 scales in the absence of a pigmentary disease-specific quality-of-life instrument.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lichen planus pigmentosus have a significantly impaired quality of life. The psychosocial burden of lichen planus pigmentosus is quantitatively similar to that of vitiligo, but significantly greater than melasma.

The Impact of Vitiligo on Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-Being in a Nepalese Population

The authors collected demographics and assessed the impact of vitiligo using Vitiligo Quality of Life (VitiQoL) and Vitiligo Impact Scale (VIS), followed by a focused survey and semistructured interviews with 22 participants in midwestern Nepal. VitiQoL and VIS scales did not indicate a large impact on quality of life; however, through interviews/focused surveys, participants expressed unhappiness/worry, problems in finding partners, securing employment, and social discrimination due to their skin lesions. These stressors are highlighted along with lack of proper physician counseling and vitiligo-related myths, which create psychosocial distress that may not be given priority in underdeveloped countries like Nepal.