Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose/Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Screening Tool for the Detection of Malignant Transformation in Individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are the leading cause of death in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. They can result from premalignant neurofibromas, including neurofibromas with atypia and atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential. Some phenotypic characteristics have been described as associated with their development. The aim of this study was to outline our use of whole-body positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/magnetic resonance imaging in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1, especially in the screening of asymptomatic individuals with a higher risk of developing an MPNST, and to study its impact on neurofibroma classification (malignant vs premalignant) and MPNST staging over time. Individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 who underwent a positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/magnetic resonance imaging between 2017 and 2021 were included, analyzing separately the screened population. Maximum standard uptake value and diffusion-weighted imaging were assessed. Biopsy/surgery confirmed the diagnosis. In all, 345 positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/magnetic resonance imaging were performed in 241 patients, including 149 asymptomatic (62%) but at-risk patients. Eight MPNSTs in 8 screened individuals (5%), 6 neurofibromas with atypia in 4 individuals (3%), and 29 atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential in 23 individuals (15%) were diagnosed. Over time, the proportion of grade 3 MPNST and the malignant/premalignant ratio in screened individuals significantly decreased (P = .03 and P < .001, respectively). This study emphasizes the diagnostic and screening performances of whole-body positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/magnetic resonance imaging in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1.

A core outcome domain set to assess cutaneous neurofibromas related to neurofibromatosis type 1 in clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) are considered one of the highest burdens of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). To date, no medical treatment can cure cNF or prevent their development. In that context, there is an urgent need to prepare and standardize the methodology of future trials targeting cNF.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to develop a core outcome domain set suitable for all clinical trials targeting NF1-associated cNF.

METHODS

The validated approach of this work consisted of a three-phase methodology: (i) generating the domains [systematic literature review (SLR) and qualitative studies]; (ii) agreeing (three-round international e-Delphi consensus process and working groups); and (iii) voting.

RESULTS

(i) The SLR and the qualitative studies (three types of focus groups and a French e-survey with 234 participants) resulted in a preliminary list of 31 candidate items and their corresponding definitions. (ii) A total of 229 individuals from 29 countries participated in the first round of the e-Delphi process: 71 patients, relatives or representatives (31.0%), 130 healthcare professionals (HCPs, 56.8%) and 28 researchers, representatives of a drug regulatory authority, industry or pharmaceutical company representatives or journal editors (12.2%). The overall participation rate was 74%. After round 2, five candidate items were excluded. Between rounds 2 and 3, international workshops were held to better understand the disagreements among stakeholders. This phase led to the identification of 19 items as outcome subdomains. (iii) The items were fused to create four outcome domains ('clinical assessment', 'daily life impact', 'patient satisfaction' and 'perception of health') and prioritized. The seven items that did not reach consensus were marked for the research agenda. The final core outcome domain set reached 100% of the votes of the steering committee members.

CONCLUSIONS

Although numerous outcomes can be explored in studies related to cNF in NF1, the present study offers four outcome domains that should be reported in all trial studies, agreed on by international patients, relatives and representatives of patients; HCPs; researchers, representatives of drug regulatory authorities or pharmaceutical companies and journal editors. The next step will include the development of a set of core outcome measurement instruments to further standardize how these outcomes should be assessed.

cNF-Skindex in Adults Living with Neurofibromatosis 1: Severity Strata in France and Validation in United States Adults

Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) contribute to the impairment of QOL in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. The cNF-Skindex, validated in a French population, specifically assesses the cNF-related QOL. In this study, we first defined severity strata using an anchoring approach on the basis of patient's burden. In total, 209 patients answered the anchor question and the cNF-Skindex. We tested the agreement among the three strata, generated by all potential couples of cut-off values of the cNF-Skindex and the three strata defined in the anchor question. The cut-off values 12 and 49 provided the highest Kappa value (κ = 0.685, 95% confidence interval = 0.604-0.765). Second, we validated the score and the strata in a United States population using the answers provided by 220 French and 148 United States adults. In the multivariable linear regression analysis, the country of origin was not a factor associated with the score (P = 0.297). The number of cNF along the different severity strata was similar between the French and the United States populations. In conclusion, stratification constitutes a powerful tool to better interpret the cNF-Skindex in daily practice and in clinical trials. This study validates its use in two populations that together constitute a large cohort of patients willing to participate in clinical research.

Quality of life in neurofibromatosis 1: development and validation of a tool dedicated to cutaneous neurofibromas in adults

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF), present in 95% of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), are considered as one of the greatest medical burden because of physical disfigurement. No specific score evaluates their impact on quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVE

To develop a specific score assessing cNF-related QoL.

METHODS

Through a multidisciplinary workshop including 10 patients, 3 expert-in-NF1 physicians, 3 health care workers (nurses and psychologist) and 1 methodologist, the French version of the Skindex-16 was modified by adding 3 items. The new cNF-Skindex was validated among patients with NF1 recruited in the ComPaRe online cohort, in France (N=284). Construct validity was assessed by comparing it with the EQ-5D-5L, its visual analog scale and the MYMOP2 and by assessing its association with patients' characteristics. Reliability was assessed by a test-retest. An English version of the tool was developed using a back forward translation.

RESULTS

A total of 228 individuals with NF1, with cNF answered the 19-item questionnaire. These items fitted into 3 domains: emotions, symptoms, functioning. One was dropped during analysis because >90% responders were not concerned. The cNF-Skindex significantly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L (N=193) and MYMOP2 (N=210) indicating good external validity: rs 0.38 (p<0.001), and 0.58 (p<0.001) respectively. Having >50 cNF was the only independent variable associated with the total score cNF-Skindex (β=15.88, 95%CI 6.96 - 24.81, p=0.001), and with the 3 sub-scores: "functioning" (β=2.65, 95%CI 0.71 - 4.59, p=0.008), "emotions" (β=17.03, 95%CI 4.11 - 29.96, p=0.010) and "symptoms" (β=3.90, 95%CI 1.95 - 5.85, p<0.001). Test-retest reliability (N=133) found an ICC at 0.96 demonstrating good reproducibility.

CONCLUSION

The cNF-Skindex demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. The global and sub-scores were increased with higher number of cNF arguing for its use in further trials aiming to reduce their number or prevent their development. Cross-cultural validation and evaluation of its responsiveness are the next steps.