British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa) 2018

Expert consensus on unmet needs, referral criteria and treatment goals for hidradenitis suppurativa in Saudi Arabia

Purpose: There is limited information about the diagnosis and treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). This Delphi consensus study was conducted to develop recommendations for the management of HS in the KSA.Methods: The expert panel including 12 dermatologists with extensive experience treating HS patients provided nine consensus statements and recommendations on diagnosis and assessment, management, comorbidities and multidisciplinary approach, and education. The experts also developed clinical questions pertaining to the management of HS and rolled out as a survey to 119 dermatologists practising in the KSA.Results: The topics covered included: referring physicians' awareness of HS; referral criteria for HS; definition of moderate-to-severe HS; treatment goals; definition of treatment success; treatment and biologic initiation; comorbidities and multidisciplinary approach; patient education and awareness of HS. Full consensus (100%) from the expert dermatologists was received on all the topics except referring physicians' awareness of HS, definition of treatment success, and treatment and biologic initiation. The survey results resonated with the expert opinion.Conclusion: As HS is a chronic disease with negative impact on quality-of-life, timely diagnosis and treatment, early identification of comorbid conditions and a multidisciplinary care approach are crucial for effective management of HS.

Oral fusidic acid for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating inflammatory skin disease. Tetracyclines are one of the few therapeutic options recommended for mild-to-moderate disease. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of systemic fusidic acid's (FA) effectiveness in treating HS.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 55 FA therapy cycles (TC, average weekly dose: 6409 mg; range: 5250-9800 mg; 2-12 weeks) in 49 patients. The outcome was evaluated using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scale. Therapy response was defined as any reduction of inflammatory activity without the occurrence of flares. We also characterized adverse events and investigated predictors for treatment success. Results were compared to a matched control group receiving doxycycline.

RESULTS

FA treatment (55 treatment cycles (TC); male: 45.5%; female: 54.5%) showed an overall response rate of 70.9% (39 TC). No worsening was observed. Significantly higher response rates were observed in females (83.3%, P = 0.026) and Hurley I (90.9%, P = 0.008). After multivariate adjustment, higher response rates were associated with the Hurley grade (P = 0.046) but not with gender (P = 0.0174). Adverse reactions (21.8% gastrointestinal symptoms) occurred in 27.3% (15 TC) and 46.7% within the first 4 weeks. Similar results were observed in the doxycycline control group (overall response rate: 76.4%).

CONCLUSION

Oral FA is safe and improves symptoms in most patients. HS patients could benefit from oral FA treatment, especially in case of contraindications or resistance to tetracyclines.

Essentials of hidradenitis suppurativa: a comprehensive review of diagnostic and treatment perspectives

Hidradenitis suppurativa, or acne inversa, is a chronic inflammatory skin condition with recurrent inflammatory nodules, abscesses, subcutaneous tracts, and scars. This condition may cause severe psychological distress and reduce the quality of life for affected individuals. It is considered to have one of the most damaging effects on quality of life of any skin disorder as a result of the discomfort and foul-smelling discharge from these lesions. Although the pathophysiology of HS is still unclear, multiple factors, including lifestyle, genetic, and hormonal factors, have been associated with it. The pathogenesis of HS is very complex and has wide clinical manifestations; thus, it is quite challenging to manage and often requires the use of combination treatments that must be tailored according to disease severity and other patient-specific factors. Although lifestyle changes, weight loss, quitting smoking, topical treatments, and oral antibiotics are adequate for mild cases, the challenge for healthcare professionals is dealing with moderate-to-severe HS, which often does not respond well to traditional approaches. This literature review, consisting of an overview of the various assessment tools and therapy strategies available for the diagnosis and treatment of HS from published literature, aims to be a guide for practicing clinicians in dealing with the complexities associated with this disease.

Evaluating the Internet as a Source of Information for Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of Websites' Content, Insights Into Engagement, and Access

BACKGROUND

The Internet has become the primary information source for patients, with most turning to online resources before seeking medical advice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of online information on hidradenitis suppurativa available to patients.

METHODS

The authors performed an Internet search using the search terms "hidradenitis suppurativa," "hidradenitis suppurativa treatment," "hidradenitis suppurativa surgery," and "acne inversa." They identified the initial 100 websites from Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Websites were evaluated based on the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients instrument.

RESULTS

Of the 300 websites, 95 (31.7%) were incorporated after accounting for the exclusion criteria: duplicate entries, websites not pertinent to the subject matter, websites inaccessible due to location restrictions or necessitating user accounts for access, websites in languages other than English, and websites originating from scientific publications directed at a scientific audience rather than the general population. Ensuring Quality Information for Patients scores ranged from 5 to 30/36, with a median of 17.

CONCLUSION

This analysis unveils a diverse array of websites that could confound patients navigating toward high-caliber resources. These barriers may hinder the access to top-tier online patient information and magnify disparities in referral rates, patient engagement, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life.

Targeted therapy for immune mediated skin diseases. What should a dermatologist know?

BACKGROUND

Molecularly targeted therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKis), have emerged as essential tools in the treatment of dermatological diseases. These therapies modulate the immune system through specific signaling pathways, providing effective alternatives to traditional systemic immunosuppressive agents. This review aims to provide an updated summary of targeted immune therapies for inflammatory skin diseases, considering their pathophysiology, efficacy, dosage, and safety profiles.

METHODS

The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed over the past 10 years, focusing on randomized clinical trials, case reports, and case series related to targeted immune therapies in dermatology. Eligibility criteria were applied, and data were extracted from each study, including citation data, study design, and results.

RESULTS

We identified 1360 non-duplicate articles with the initial search strategy. Title and abstract review excluded 1150, while a full-text review excluded an additional 50 articles. The review included 143 studies published between 2012 and 2022, highlighting 39 drugs currently under investigation or in use for managing inflammatory skin diseases.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The heterogeneity of summarized information limits this review. Some recommendations originated from data from clinical trials, while others relied on retrospective analyses and small case series. Recommendations will likely be updated as new results emerge.

CONCLUSION

Targeted therapies have revolutionized the treatment of chronic skin diseases, offering new options for patients unresponsive to standard treatments. Paradoxical reactions are rarely observed. Further studies are needed to fully understand the mechanisms and nature of these therapies. Overall, targeted immune therapies in dermatology represent a promising development, significantly improving the quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

Formulation and systemic therapy

This is a Specialty Certificate Examination Case on the systemic therapy of hidradenitis suppurativa.

Trends in antibiotic prescriptions for hidradenitis suppurativa from 2015 to 2021

Antibiotic use in hidradenitis suppurativa is decreasing, while the use of adalimumab, glucagon-like peptide agonists and spironolactone increased between 2015 and 2021.

A review of surgical and reconstructive techniques for hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory follicular dermatological condition that typically affects the intertriginous and anogenital regions of the apocrine gland-bearing skin. The management of this chronic and recurring disease necessitates a combination of lifestyle changes, medication, and surgical approaches to achieve the best possible outcomes. While medical treatments are recommended for this multimodal disease, surgical therapy, which is the gold standard of treatment for HS, has proven to be the most effective treatment because it provides long-lasting local disease control, reduces the recurrence of lesions, and ensures complete healing of lesions. In the last decade, there has been exponential growth in research into various surgical techniques and reconstructive care, enabling patients to have more surgical options. There is a wide range of surgical management procedures available, such as incision and drainage, deroofing, excisional surgery, carbon dioxide laser therapy, and skin tissue-sparing excision with electrosurgical peeling. Among these surgical procedures, wide surgical excision is the best option since it can eradicate all the affected lesions. Meanwhile, the preferred approach to reconstruction at various anatomical locations remains debatable. Here, we review a variety of surgical treatments and reconstructive techniques for HS, particularly various flap techniques for the axillary, gluteal, and inframammary regions.

What support is available for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa to stop smoking and maintain a healthy weight? A guide for clinicians

Guidelines on hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) recommend that patients with obesity be advised to lose weight and people who smoke be advised to quit as a first-line management step. This article aims to inform dermatologists about the various weight loss and smoking cessation services available. We hope that this knowledge can empower clinicians to advise patients with HS on how to access the right support to achieve these goals.

Deroofing: A safe, effective and well-tolerated procedure in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a recurrent, debilitating, chronic disorder of the pilosebaceous unit. Although advances in HS treatment have been made, more than 45% of patients remain dissatisfied with systemic treatment, and more than one-third are dissatisfied with surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVES

A prospective, observational study on the deroofing procedures in HS with special attention paid to patient satisfaction and complications.

METHODS

HS lesions were assessed clinically and by the use of ultrasound. Patients reported outcomes, including pain, itch and satisfaction, were measured at 24 h post-surgery by a numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. Additionally, the timeline of objective wound closure reported by patients in (weeks), in addition to the need for any analgesics use, were both evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean closure time of the post-deroofing wound was assessed as 4.4 ± 1.9 weeks. A statistically longer time was necessary for complete closure in males than in females (4.9 ± 2.2 weeks and 3.9 ± 1.6 weeks, respectively; p = 0.046). The closure time correlated positively yet weakly with the HS tunnel's width (r = 0.27, p = 0.016) and length (r = 0.228, p = 0.044). Patients assessed mean pain at 24 h post-op as mild with 0.7 ± 1.2 points according to NRS, with no differences between sexes. Similarly, itch in the first 24 h was assessed as mild with 1.8 ± 1.1 points, without differences between sexes. No pain, itch or adverse events were reported after 1 week following deroofing. Moreover, no cases of wound infection were reported. An overall patient satisfaction was assessed as 9.9 ± 0.4 points (range 9-10 points).

CONCLUSION

Deroofing is an easy, effective and safe dermatosurgical procedure that does not require surgical experience or operating theatre. It is associated with no complications and very low post-op pain and should be part of holistic HS management.

Topical and Intralesional Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Topical and intralesional (IL) treatments may be considered the first-line therapy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS); however, the evidence supporting their use is limited. The aim of our review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of topical and IL treatments in patients with HS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a systematic review of the current medical literature available following the PICO(T) method. And including all types of studies (Study type [T]) of individuals with HS of any sex, age, and ethnicity (Population [P]) who received any topical or IL treatment for HS (Intervention [I]) compared to placebo, other treatments, or no treatment at all (Comparator [C]), and reported efficacy and/or safety outcomes (Outcomes [O]). Two outcomes were defined: quality of life and the no. of patients with, at least, one adverse event. The search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase databases; study selection was performed based on pre-defined criteria. The risk of bias was determined in each study.

RESULTS

We obtained a total of 11,363 references, 31 of which met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 1143 patients with HS, 62% of whom were women. A total of 10, 8, 6, 2, and 5 studies, respectively, evaluated the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT), glucocorticoids, resorcinol, topical antibiotics, and other interventions. Most articles were case series (n=25), with only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and one cohort study. RCTs showed improvement in disease activity with topical clindamycin and botulinum toxin (BTX) vs placebo, and PDT with methylene blue (MB) niosomal vs free MB; however, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide was not superior to placebo. The risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in two RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The quality of evidence supporting the use of topical, or IL treatments is low. However, it supports the use of topical clindamycin, PDT, and BTX. Well-designed RCTs with standardized outcomes and homogeneous populations of patients and lesions are needed to support decision-making in the routine clinical practice.

Topical and Intralesional Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Topical and intralesional (IL) treatments may be considered the first-line therapy in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS); however, the evidence supporting their use is limited. The aim of our review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of topical and IL treatments in patients with HS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a systematic review of the current medical literature available following the PICO(T) method. And including all types of studies (Study type [T]) of individuals with HS of any sex, age, and ethnicity (Population [P]) who received any topical or IL treatment for HS (Intervention [I]) compared to placebo, other treatments, or no treatment at all (Comparator [C]), and reported efficacy and/or safety outcomes (Outcomes [O]). Two outcomes were defined: quality of life and the no. of patients with, at least, one adverse event. The search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases; study selection was performed based on pre-defined criteria. The risk of bias was determined in each study.

RESULTS

We obtained a total of 11,363 references, 31 of which met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 1143 patients with HS, 62% of whom were women. A total of 10, 8, 6, 2, and 5 studies, respectively, evaluated the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT), glucocorticoids, resorcinol, topical antibiotics, and other interventions. Most articles were case series (n=25), with only five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and one cohort study. RCTs showed improvement in disease activity with topical clindamycin and botulinum toxin (BTX) vs placebo, and PDT with methylene blue (MB) niosomal vs free MB; however, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide was not superior to placebo. The risk of bias was low in three RCTs and high in two RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The quality of evidence supporting the use of topical, or IL treatments is low. However, it supports the use of topical clindamycin, PDT, and BTX. Well-designed RCTs with standardized outcomes and homogeneous populations of patients and lesions are needed to support decision-making in the routine clinical practice.

Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with or without a Split-Thickness Skin Graft in the Surgical Management of Axillary Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) alone or with the addition of a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) are 2 reconstructive options available after surgical excision of axillary hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The aim of this study was to retrospectively examine patients undergoing these treatments and to assess clinical and patient-related outcome measures. Methods: A single-centre, retrospective analysis was conducted, evaluating surgical excision of axillary HS, with STSG and NPWT, or NPWT alone. Data collected included No. of post-operative clinic visits, time to heal, size of wound, disease recurrence, follow-up time, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (PAINVAS2), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), and Dermatology Visual Analogue Scale (DERMVAS). Two-tailed t-test and Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon U-tests were used to assess for significant relationships. Results: One hundred five patients were included in the study, 44 who received NPWT alone, and 61 who received NPWT + STSG. There was no significant difference in follow-up time (P = .934) or No. of follow-up appointments between groups (P = .287). There was a significant difference in time to heal between groups, with STSG + NPWT observing a mean time of 2.77 months and NPWT alone observing a mean time of 4.40 months (P = .0006). There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups. Conclusion: There is no difference in patient-reported outcomes with the addition of an STSG to NPWT after surgical excision of HS. Wide excision and use of NPWT alone is an effective procedure for the treatment of axillary HS.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Online Documents Readability: An Analysis Including 23 European Languages

Purpose

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a complex disease with the vast burden to patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate readability of online electronic materials dedicated to HS.

Patients and Methods

The terms "hidradenitis suppurativa" and "acne inversa" translated into 23 official European Union languages were searched with Google. For each language, first 50 results were assessed for suitability. Included materials were focused on patient's education, had no barriers and were not advertisements. If both terms generated the same results, duplicated materials were excluded from the analysis. Origin of the article was categorized into non-profit, online-shop, dermatology clinic or pharmaceutical company class. Readability was evaluated with Lix score.

Results

A total of 458 articles in 22 languages were evaluated. The overall mean Lix score was 57 ± 9. This classified included articles as very hard to comprehend. Across all included languages significant differences in Lix score were revealed (P < 0.001). No significant differences across all origin categories and Lix scores were observed (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Despite the coverage of HS on the Internet, its complexity made it hard to comprehend. Dermatologist should ensure readable, barrier-free online educational materials. With adequate Google promotion, these would be beneficial for both physicians and patients.

Low referral rate of overweight/obese patients with hidradenitis suppurativa to weight-management services: a missed opportunity?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors. Referral of overweight/obese patients with HS to weight-management (WM) services is advised as this may help reduce HS disease severity and cardiovascular risk. A retrospective observational study of 50 patients with HS attending a specialist HS clinic was conducted to assess general practitioner referral patterns of overweight/obese patients with HS for WM. Forty-two patients (84%) were classified as overweight or obese. None of 6 overweight patients and none of 18 obese class 1 patients had been referred to WM prior to dermatology referral, while only 2 of 10 (20%) obese class 2 and 3 of 8 (38%) obese class 3 patients had been referred. The overall WM referral rate for overweight/obese patients was only 12% (n = 5/42). The low referral rate suggests that further efforts are required to diagnose overweight/obesity in primary care, improve the provision of WM services and educate medical professionals that HS is a weight-related comorbidity.

Comparative efficacy and therapeutic positioning of biologics in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a challenging inflammatory skin condition. Recently, many different biologics have been tested for HS, but the paucity of head-to-head comparative trials makes it difficult to determine the real value of each biological intervention. We aimed to determine the relative efficacy among biologics in treating moderate-to-severe HS throughout a network meta-analysis (NMA) and, to identify which pathogenetic pathways may be the most appropriate to target. Methods We comprehensively identified studies in 3 databases and clinicaltrials.gov. The eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on the efficacy of moderate-to-severe HS. Results The NMA comprised 13 studies comprising 14 interventions on 2,748 participants in the network. The NMA showed the odds of achieving the clinical response were significantly superior with adalimumab (RR: 0.37, 95% CI = 0.06-0.63), adalimumab QW (RR: 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.87), MAB1p (RR: 1.33, 95% CI = 0.03-3.12), secukinumab (RR: 0.25, 95% CI = 0.11-0.47) and secukinumabQ2W (RR: 0.24, 95% CI = 0.1-0.46) compared to placebo. Conclusion Based on the NMA, inhibiting tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a with adalimumab appears to be the best strategy, followed by the blockade of IL--17 with secukinumab. Data for bimekizumab and CJM112 are promising. Infliximab has inconsistent clinical response, and more data are necessary to confirm this molecule as a potential third-line therapy in HS. The blockade of IL-23 and CD5a pathways is not relevant, or at least the current evidence is insufficient to recommend further investigation of guselkumab, risankizumab, and vilobelimab in phase III trials.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study (THESEUS): a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful disease affecting flexures and other skin regions, producing nodules, abscesses and skin tunnels. Laser treatment targeting hair follicles and deroofing of skin tunnels are standard HS interventions in some countries but are rarely offered in the UK.

OBJECTIVES

To describe current UK HS management pathways and influencing factors to inform the design of future randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

THESEUS was a nonrandomized 12-month prospective cohort study set in 10 UK hospitals offering five interventions: oral doxycycline 200 mg daily; oral clindamycin and rifampicin both 300 mg twice daily for 10 weeks, extended for longer in some cases; laser treatment targeting hair follicles; deroofing; and conventional surgery. The primary outcome was the combination of clinician-assessed eligibility and participant hypothetical willingness to receive each intervention. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants selecting each intervention as their final treatment option; the proportion who switch treatments; treatment fidelity; and attrition rates. THESEUS was prospectively registered on the ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN69985145.

RESULTS

The recruitment target of 150 participants was met after 18 months, in July 2021, with two pauses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline demographics reflected the HS secondary care population: average age 36 years, 81% female, 20% non-White, 64% current or ex-smokers, 86% body mass index ≥ 25, 68% with moderate disease, 19% with severe disease and 13% with mild disease. Laser was the intervention with the highest proportion (69%) of participants eligible and willing to receive treatment, then deroofing (58%), conventional surgery (54%), clindamycin and rifampicin (44%), and doxycycline (37%). Laser was ranked first choice by the greatest proportion of participants (41%). Attrition rates were 11% and 17% after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Concordance with doxycycline was 52% after 3 months due to lack of efficacy, participant choice and adverse effects. Delays with procedural interventions were common, with only 43% and 26% of participants starting laser and deroofing, respectively, after 3 months. Uptake of conventional surgery was too small to characterize the intervention. Switching treatment was uncommon and there were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

THESEUS has established laser treatment and deroofing for HS in the UK and demonstrated their popularity with patients and clinicians for future RCTs.

Very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (Acne Inversa): an effective and safe tool for improvement of the clinical severity of disease. Results of a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), an inflammatory-based dermatological condition often associated with obesity, poses significant challenges in management. The very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) has shown efficacy in addressing obesity, related metabolic disorders, and reducing chronic inflammation. However, its effects on HS remain underexplored. In this prospective pilot study, we aimed to investigate the impact of a 28-day active phase of VLCKD on HS in a sample of treatment-naive women with HS and excess weight.

METHODS

Twelve women with HS and overweight or obesity (BMI 27.03 to 50.14 kg/m2), aged 21 to 54 years, meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria and agreeing to adhere to VLCKD, were included. Baseline lifestyle habits were assessed. The Sartorius score was used to evaluate the clinical severity of HS. Anthropometric parameters (waist circumference, weight, height, and body mass index), body composition via bioelectrical impedance analysis, levels of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), and derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (dROMs) were assessed at baseline and after 28 days of the active phase of VLCKD.

RESULTS

VLCKD led to general improvements in anthropometric parameters and body composition. Notably, a significant reduction in the Sartorius score was observed after the intervention (Δ%: - 24.37 ± 16.64, p < 0.001). This reduction coincided with significant decreases in TMAO (p < 0.001), dROMs (p = 0.001), and oxLDL (p < 0.001) levels. Changes in the Sartorius score exhibited positive correlations with changes in TMAO (p < 0.001), dROMs (p < 0.001), and oxLDL (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The 28-day active phase of VLCKD demonstrated notable improvements in HS severity and associated metabolic markers, highlighting the potential utility of VLCKD in managing HS and its association with metabolic derangements in women with overweight or obesity.

Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) consensus recommendations for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory follicular disease characterized by painful, recurrent, inflamed lesions most commonly occurring in the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. HS can inflict immense physical and psychological impact on patients who suffer from this distressing disease. Management of HS generally requires combining various medical and procedural treatment modalities; however, the disease is often recalcitrant to conventional treatments. In light of recent evidence supporting the effectiveness of biologic agents in the treatment of HS, the Taiwanese Dermatological Association established an expert panel of nine dermatologists to develop consensus statements aimed to provide up-to-date evidence-based guidance in optimizing HS patient management in Taiwan. The recommendations described in the statements were summarized in a management algorithm in terms of general care, topical treatment, systemic treatment, and procedural treatment.

Hidradenitis suppurativa tarda: defining an understudied elderly population

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, devastating, multifactorial skin disease. Patients generally develop HS after puberty and the prevalence of the disease is assumed to decrease with higher age. Data outside the usual age range are limited, especially for elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics and associated comorbidities among the elderly HS population.

METHODS

Data were collected through a population-wide survey-based study within the Lifelines Cohort Study in the Netherlands. The clinical characteristics of elderly patients with HS (≥ 60 years) were compared with an adult population (< 60 years) with HS. The comorbidities in elderly patients with HS were compared with those of a non-HS sex- and age-matched elderly population in a 1 : 4 ratio. HS in the elderly was defined as active HS in patients aged 60 years and older. Within the HS elderly group, two subgroups were defined, late-onset HS (HS developed after 60 years of age) and persistent HS (HS developed from a younger age but continuing after 60 years of age).

RESULTS

Within the Lifelines cohort 209 elderly patients with HS were identified as well as an adult (< 60 years) group with HS (n = 793) and a non-HS sex- and age-matched control elderly group (n = 810). The prevalence of HS among the elderly bootstrap analysis population was 0.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.2]. A significantly higher age of HS symptom onset was found compared with the adult HS group: respectively, 40 vs. 23 years (odds ratio 1.056, 95% CI 1.05-1.07). Among the elderly HS cohort (in the Discussion, the HS tarda cohort) a female : male ratio of 1.7 : 1.0 and a higher family history for HS were found. Moreover, elderly patients with HS had a significantly higher risk of having HS-associated comorbidities compared with the sex- and age-matched controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HS in the elderly is not rare. Among the elderly a shift from female predominance towards a lower female : male ratio in HS is observed. In addition, HS in the elderly showed significant variation in age of onset and involved body areas. Moreover, elderly patients with HS were more susceptible to multimorbidity. Finally, we propose defining HS in the elderly as 'HS tarda' and subdividing it as late-onset and persistent HS tarda.

Drug survival of metformin in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

Despite there being published studies on the survival of oral retinoids and biological drugs in people with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), there is little scientific evidence on the use of metformin in this setting. We conducted a single-centre, retrospective cohort study in Spain, between January 2015 and December 2021 to determine the drug survival of metformin at 12 months in people with HS in a real-world setting. We concluded that drug survival of metformin is relatively long: half the patients were still on the drug after 1 year of treatment and one in five patients were still on the drug after 2 years.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study: the THESEUS prospective cohort study

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterised by recurrent inflammatory lesions and skin tunnels in flexural sites such as the axilla. Deroofing of skin tunnels and laser treatment are standard hidradenitis suppurativa interventions in some countries but not yet introduced in the United Kingdom.

Objective

To understand current hidradenitis suppurativa management pathways and what influences treatment choices to inform the design of future randomised controlled trials.

Design

Prospective 12-month observational cohort study, including five treatment options, with nested qualitative interviews and an end-of-study consensus workshop.

Setting

Ten United Kingdom hospitals with recruitment led by dermatology and plastic surgery departments.

Participants

Adults with active hidradenitis suppurativa of any severity not adequately controlled by current treatment.

Interventions

Oral doxycycline 200 mg once daily; oral clindamycin and rifampicin, both 300 mg twice daily for 10 weeks initially; laser treatment targeting the hair follicle (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet or alexandrite); deroofing; and conventional surgery.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who are eligible, and hypothetically willing, to use the different treatment options. Secondary outcomes included proportion of participants choosing each of the study interventions, with reasons for their choices; proportion of participants who switched treatments; treatment fidelity; loss to follow-up rates over 12 months; and efficacy outcome estimates to inform outcome measure instrument responsiveness.

Results

Between February 2020 and July 2021, 151 participants were recruited, with two pauses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up rates were 89% and 83% after 3 and 6 months, decreasing to 70% and 44% at 9 and 12 months, respectively, because pandemic recruitment delays prevented all participants reaching their final review. Baseline demographics included an average age of 36 years, 81% female, 20% black, Asian or Caribbean, 64% current or ex-smokers and 86% with a raised body mass index. Some 69% had moderate disease, 19% severe disease and 13% mild disease. Regarding the study's primary outcome, laser treatment was the intervention with the highest proportion (69%) of participants who were eligible and hypothetically willing to receive treatment, followed by deroofing (58%), conventional surgery (54%), the combination of oral clindamycin and rifampicin (44%) and doxycycline (37%). Considering participant willingness in isolation, laser was ranked first choice by the greatest proportion (41%) of participants. The cohort study and qualitative study demonstrated that participant willingness to receive treatment was strongly influenced by their clinician. Fidelity to oral doxycycline was only 52% after 3 months due to lack of effectiveness, participant preference and adverse effects. Delays receiving procedural interventions were common, with only 43% and 26% of participants commencing laser therapy and deroofing, respectively, after 3 months. Treatment switching was uncommon and there were no serious adverse events. Daily pain score text messages were initiated in 110 participants. Daily responses reduced over time with greatest concordance during the first 14 days.

Limitations

It was not possible to characterise conventional surgery due to a low number of participants.

Conclusion

The Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study established deroofing and laser treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the United Kingdom and developed a network of 10 sites for subsequent hidradenitis suppurativa randomised controlled trials.

Future work

The consensus workshop prioritised laser treatment and deroofing as interventions for future randomised controlled trials, in some cases combined with drug treatment.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN69985145.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/35/64) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 30. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

What should a surgeon know about hidradenitis suppurativa?

Otherwise known as Verneuil's disease, hidradenitis suppurative (HS) is a severe dermatosis of heterogeneous appearance affecting 1% of the population. Its pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, inflammatory disorder and environmental elements. Its diagnosis is based on the association of three clinical characteristics: characteristic lesions, typical localizations, and the chronic and recurrent nature of the lesions. Given its diversified aspects, diagnosis can be difficult to achieve. As its manifestations often include abscesses, it is important for the surgeon to know how to detect this pathology. The development of biologics has improved treatment of this disease, treatment that necessitates a multidisciplinary medical and surgical approach involving dermatologists and proctologists as well as surgeons. The objective of this report is to synthesize what a surgeon will need to know so as effectively treat HS patients.

Assessing unmet needs in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

The diagnosis and management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) varies greatly between providers, often resulting in gaps in care including diagnostic delays and poor outcomes. As dermatologists strive to improve HS management, understanding patient perspectives is key. This study aims to characterize existing gaps in HS care as understood through patients' experiences. This study recruited adult patients with a diagnosis of HS seen at dermatology practices affiliated with Northwestern University. Data were collected through participant surveys and three semi-structured focus groups. Focus group meetings were transcribed verbatim and data were abstracted into themes using conventional content analysis. Six final themes were abstracted after review of 20 pages of transcribed conversation. Four themes centered on improved medical management of HS (access to care, disease-modifying therapies, symptom treatment, prevention of treatment-related adverse events). Two themes centered on supportive care (mental health support, specialized daily wear products). Limitations of this study include single-center recruitment and recall bias introduced by the focus group format. This study identifies six unmet needs for patients with HS and highlights the efficacy of a virtual format for research, conversation, and possibly clinical engagement. Moreover, multiple themes underscore the need for further collaboration across specialties in managing HS.

Treatment Strategies in Neutrophilic Dermatoses: A Comprehensive Review

Neutrophilic dermatoses (NDs) are a group of noninfectious disorders characterized by the presence of a sterile neutrophilic infiltrate without vasculitis histopathology. Their physiopathology is not fully understood. The association between neutrophilic dermatoses and autoinflammatory diseases has led some authors to propose that both are part of the same spectrum of diseases. The classification of NDs depends on clinical and histopathological features. This review focuses on the recent developments of treatments in these pathologies.

Opportunity for significant reduction in risk of major adverse cardiac events with screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors in hidradenitis suppurativa

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) have a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors and are at increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Routine screening for risk factors is recommended but the benefit of this in risk reduction has not been evaluated. In this study of 117 patients attending hospital-based services for HS, there was a high burden of undiagnosed cardiovascular disease risk factors. Risk factor optimization significantly reduced 10-year risk of MACE.

Shorter time to initiation of biologic therapy in the setting of a hidradenitis suppurativa specialty clinic

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic condition with a significant psychological and physical burden but a paucity of effective treatments. Early intervention with adalimumab improves disease outcomes. Two previous studies in Denmark and Northern Ireland have identified a time of 8.2 and 2.9 years, respectively, from first HS systemic/dermatology consultation to commencing a biologic. We aimed to evaluate the time from disease onset and from first specialty HS clinic review to the initiation of biologic therapy. We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients on biologic treatment for HS. The mean diagnostic delay was 12.4 years. The mean time from disease onset to biologic initiation was 14.8 years. Prior to a biologic, patients received a median of 3.3 treatments from the specialty HS clinic. The median time to biologic from first presentation at the specialty HS clinic was 1 year. This is shorter than the therapeutic delay reported in dermatology clinics in Denmark and Northern Ireland, providing evidence on the importance of specialized HS treatment. However, to make an impact with specialized HS care and earlier biologic initiation, diagnostic delay needs to be reduced.

Obesity and hidradenitis suppurativa: targeting meta-inflammation for therapeutic gain

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory condition of the pilosebaceous unit. The typical patient with HS is characterized as someone with obesity, who smokes and who has nodules, abscesses and/or draining tunnels predominantly distributed in intertriginous skin. It has been established that lifestyle and genetic factors are the main pathophysiological drivers of HS. In this critical review, we explore the interrelatedness of meta-inflammation, obesity and HS and discuss if and how this relationship may be manipulated for a therapeutic end.

Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease in Hospitalized Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with several comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. These comorbidities are also risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet little is known about the risk of CKD in HS patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to study the prevalence of CKD in HS patients.

METHODS

Cross-sectional population-based study using the United States National Inpatient Sample database between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012 was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 23,767 hospital admissions for HS patients and 95,068 admissions for age- and gender-matched controls. The prevalence of CKD in HS patients was 6.3% (1,497/23,767) compared to non-HS controls which was 4.3% (4,052/95,068). The association of CKD was strongest in HS patients, who were ≥60 years old, 16.9% (475/2,811), male 7.3% (695/9,556), obese 7.8% (407/5,209), diabetic 12.5% (890/7,105), hyperlipidemic 13.3% (416/3,126), and had cardiovascular diseases 12.5% (631/5,045). The crude odds ratio of CKD in HS patients was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.420-1.605) compared to non-HS patients. The association remained significant after adjusting for important covariates with adjusted odds ratio of CKD in HS patients of 1.1 (95% CI: 1.014-1.176) compared to non-HS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that there is a possible association of HS with CKD. Any signs of CKD should be assessed by a nephrologist as early diagnosis can hopefully prevent further progression.

Hidradenitis suppurativa and psoriasis: the odd couple

Psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa are chronic inflammatory skin diseases that can develop together, negatively impacting on the patient's quality of life. We aimed to review the most up-to-date information regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation and possible therapeutical choices in patients with both psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa, thus linking these two autoimmune and autoinflammatory conditions. A narrative review of articles dating from 2017 to 2022 has been performed using the PubMed database. We analyzed the case reports and case series found in the literature regarding patients who suffered from both psoriasis and HS. Psoriasis arose before hidradenitis suppurativa in the majority of cases, while only a minority of them had hidradenitis suppurativa before psoriasis. Interestingly, some patients suffered from paradoxical hidradenitis suppurativa following biological therapy administered to treat the already present psoriasis. Lastly, new biological drugs have been marketed with great success for the outcome of psoriasis, but similar progress did not happen for hidradenitis. Novel therapeutic approaches and lines of research are needed for the treatment of these pathologies, even if concomitant, in order to improve patient's quality of life.

Systemic Antibiotic Therapy in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review on Treatment Landscape and Current Issues

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, and inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful, deep-seated, nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts in sensitive areas of the body, including axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. Antibiotics represent the first-line pharmacological treatment of HS because of their anti-inflammatory properties and antimicrobial effects. This narrative review summarizes the most significant current issues on the role of systemic antibiotics in the management of HS, critically analyzing the main limits of their use (antibiotic resistance and toxicity). Although, in the last decades, several cytokines have been implicated in the pathomechanism of HS and the research on the use of novel biologic agents in HS has been intensified, antibiotics remain a valid therapeutic approach. Future challenges regarding antibiotic therapy in HS comprise their use in association with biologics in the management of acute flare or as a bridge therapy to surgery.

Metformin Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Effect on Metabolic Parameters, Inflammation, Cardiovascular Risk Biomarkers, and Immune Mediators

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a common cutaneous and systemic inflammatory disease with a significant impact on mental health and quality of life. It is associated with obesity, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular (CV) disease, and increased all-cause mortality. Metformin is used frequently in HS treatment and is effective for some patients. The mechanism of action of metformin in HS is unknown. A case-control study of 40 patients with HS (20 on metformin and 20 controls) was conducted to assess differences in metabolic markers, inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP], serum adipokines, and CV risk biomarkers), and serum immune mediators. Body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance (77%), and metabolic syndrome (44%) were high overall, but not significantly different between the groups. This highlights the need for co-morbidity screening and management. A significant reduction in fasting insulin and a trend towards a reduction in insulin resistance were identified in the metformin group compared with pre-treatment levels. CV risk biomarkers were significantly favourable in the metformin group (lymphocytes, monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio). CRP was lower in the metformin group but was not statistically significant. Adipokines were dysregulated overall but were not different between the two groups. Serum IFN-γ, IL-8, TNF-α, and CXCL1 trended lower in the metformin group but did not reach significance. These results suggest that metformin improves CV risk biomarkers and insulin resistance in patients with HS. When the results of this study are considered alongside other studies in HS and related conditions, it is likely that metformin also has beneficial effects on metabolic markers and systemic inflammation in HS (CRP, serum adipokines, and immune mediators), warranting further research.

[Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa]

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory dermatosis characterized by the presence of inflammatory nodules and abscesses in the apocrine gland-rich areas that may progress to suppurative fistulas and scars. Despite being considered one of the dermatological conditions with the greatest impact on patient quality of life, it is often underdiagnosed. Hidradenitis suppurativa, especially in its severe forms, is associated with numerous comorbidities, so a holistic and multidisciplinary perspective is crucial for the management of these patients. The therapeutic approach is complex and challenging. The medical treatment options are diverse and must be adapted to clinical presentation and disease severity. Surgical therapy should be considered as an adjuvant to medical treatment, particularly in refractory cases and in the presence of scars or anatomical and/or functional mutilation. These recommendations reflect the main aspects of the management of the patient with hidradenitis suppurativa and are addressed to all healthcare professionals who take part in their follow-up.

The impact of hidradenitis suppurativa on professional life

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects intertriginous skin.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent of work ability and productivity impairment as a result of HS in Germany.

METHODS

A prospective, multicentre, epidemiological, noninterventional study of patients with HS was conducted. Medical history, medical examination performed by dermatologists and patient-reported outcomes [Work Ability Index (WAI) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)] were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 481 patients with HS included in the study, 99% were below the current statutory retirement age. In total, 53·3% of patients were working full time, 16·8% part time and 7·3% had retired. The unemployment rate was 12·6%, two times higher than in the general German population. Medical leave because of HS, within the last 6 months, was reported in 41·4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 36·9-46·0], with a duration of 39·3 days on average (95% CI 32·4-46·1). The mean HS-related WPAI absenteeism was 13.3% (95% CI 9·7-16·8), and the loss in productivity because of HS during working hours (WPAI presenteeism) was 25.2% (95% CI 21·8-28·6). Presenteeism was associated with HS disease severity. Overall work impairment because of HS was 33·4% (95% CI 29·3-37·6). The WAI score for patients was 32·2, ∼20% lower than for the average German employee. Only 62·8% of patients were relatively certain that they would be able to perform their work in the coming 2 years. Being more depressed and having more severe pain were associated with lower work ability and overall work impairment. The estimated annual loss of gross value added because of HS for Germany was ∼€12.6 billion (€3.3 billion related to a lower employment rate, €3.5 billion related to absenteeism and €5.8 billion related to presenteeism).

CONCLUSIONS

HS leads to a substantial decrease in work ability and productivity and considerable loss of gross value added. Impairment during working hours correlates with disease severity, underlining the socioeconomic importance of early and adequate treatment. Furthermore, decreased work ability and productivity is linked to depressed mood and severe pain, aspects that need more attention in patient care.

Overview and comparison of the clinical scores in hidradenitis suppurativa: A real-life clinical data

Introduction

Partly due to its clinical heterogeneity, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is difficult to score accurately; illustrated by the large number of disease scores. In 2016, a systematic review by Ingram et al. reported the use of about thirty scores, and since then, this number has increased further. Our aim is twofold: to provide a succinct but detailed narrative review of the scores used to date, and to compare these scores with each other for individual patients.

Materials and methods

The review of the literature was done among articles in English and French, on Google, Google scholar, Pubmed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane. To illustrate the differences between scores, data from some Belgian patients included in the European Registry for HS were selected. A first series of patients compares the severity of the following scores: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, three versions of Sartorius score (2003, 2007, 2009), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA), International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4), Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (SAHS), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Index (HSSI), Acne Inversa Severity Index (AISI), the Static Metascore, and one score that is not specific to HS: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A second set of patients illustrates how some scores change over time and with treatment: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, Sartorius 2003, Sartorius 2007, HS-PGA, IHS4, SAHS, AISI, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), the very new iHS4-55, the Dynamic Metascore, and DLQI.

Results

Nineteen scores are detailed in this overview. We illustrate that for some patients, the scores do not predictably and consistently correlate with each other, either in an evaluation of the severity at a time-point t, or in the evaluation of the response to a treatment. Some patients in this cohort may be considered responders according to some scores, but non-responders according to others. The clinical heterogeneity of the disease, represented by its many phenotypes, seems partly to explain this difference.

Conclusion

These examples illustrate how the choice of a score can lead to different interpretations of the response to a treatment, or even potentially change the results of a randomized clinical trial.

Rifampin-moxifloxacin-metronidazole combination therapy for severe Hurley stage 1 hidradenitis suppurativa: prospective short-term trial and 1-year follow-up in 28 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Severe Hurley stage 1 hidradenitis suppurativa (HS1) is a difficult-to-treat form of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerance of the oral combination of rifampin (10 mg/kg once daily)/moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily)/metronidazole (250-500 mg 3 times daily) (RMoM) treatment strategy in patients with severe HS1.

METHODS

Prospective, open-label, noncomparative cohort study in 28 consecutive patients. Nineteen patients were treated for 6 weeks by RMoM, followed by 4 weeks of rifampin/moxifloxacin alone, then by cotrimoxazole after remission. Moxifloxacin was replaced by pristinamycin (1 g 3 times daily) in 9 patients because of contraindications or intolerance. The primary endpoint was a Sartorius score of 0 (clinical remission) at week 12.

RESULTS

The median Sartorius score dropped from 14 to 0 (P = 6 × 10^-6) at week 12, with 75% of patients reaching clinical remission. A low initial Sartorius score was a prognosis factor for clinical remission (P = .049). The main adverse effects were mild gastrointestinal discomfort, mucosal candidiasis, and asthenia. At 1 year of follow-up, the median number of flares dropped from 21/year to 1 (P = 1 × 10^-5).

LIMITATIONS

Small, monocentric, noncontrolled study.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete and prolonged remission can be obtained in severe HS1 by using targeted antimicrobial treatments.

Cannabinoid Compounds as a Pharmacotherapeutic Option for the Treatment of Non-Cancer Skin Diseases

The endocannabinoid system has been shown to be involved in various skin functions, such as melanogenesis and the maintenance of redox balance in skin cells exposed to UV radiation, as well as barrier functions, sebaceous gland activity, wound healing and the skin's immune response. In addition to the potential use of cannabinoids in the treatment and prevention of skin cancer, cannabinoid compounds and derivatives are of interest as potential systemic and topical applications for the treatment of various inflammatory, fibrotic and pruritic skin conditions. In this context, cannabinoid compounds have been successfully tested as a therapeutic option for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia, atopic and seborrhoeic dermatitis, dermatomyositis, asteatotic and atopic eczema, uraemic pruritis, scalp psoriasis, systemic sclerosis and venous leg ulcers. This review provides an insight into the current literature on cannabinoid compounds as potential medicines for the treatment of skin diseases.

Pain measurement in painful skin conditions and rheumatoid arthritis randomized controlled trials: a scoping review to inform pain measurement in hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Pain is the most common and bothersome symptom experienced by people with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and has been prioritized as an outcome domain by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC).

OBJECTIVES

To perform a scoping review of pain measurement in randomized control trials (RCTs) of painful skin conditions (PSCs) and use of the pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in rheumatoid arthritis RCTs, to inform the efforts of HISTORIC to reach consensus on how to measure pain intensity in HS trials.

METHODS

A search was conducted on several publication databases. Inclusion criteria were RCTs with a minimum of 10 participants that measured pain intensity.

RESULTS

Pain NRS and VAS were used in 68% of PSC trials. Respectively, 77% and 87% of PSC and rheumatoid arthritis RCTs did not specify the recall window. The commonest recall window in PSCs when specified was 24 h. In total, 33% of PSC trials assessed maximum pain intensity and 3% average pain intensity, while 87% of rheumatoid arthritis trials did not provide details. Pain data were reported as mean difference by 76% of PSC trials and 75% of rheumatoid arthritis trials. Respectively, 10% and 11% of PSC and rheumatoid arthritis studies reported pain as the percentage of patients reaching a desirable state and only 1% and 2% reported number needed to treat.

CONCLUSIONS

While pain NRS and VAS are standard methods to measure pain intensity in PSCs, key details such as the recall window are often omitted and there is no consensus on how to report pain NRS data. What is already known about this topic? Pain is the most burdensome symptom experienced by patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and has been prioritized as an outcome domain by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). What does this study add? Our review shows substantial variation in how pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and visual analogue scale are utilized in clinical trials. This variation restricts meta-analysis of pain intensity results. There is a need for consensus regarding the recall window for pain NRS and maximum vs. average pain, and whether current pain should be measured.

Real-World Considerations of Candidacy for Biologics in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory skin disease that is often recalcitrant to multiple treatments. In determining biologic candidacy for patients with HS, we propose a paradigm shift away from Hurley staging and towards consideration of other variables. Biologics represent a long-term treatment option for HS that may serve as a disease-modifying agent. These medications are typically initiated in patients with moderate to severe disease, which, based on inclusion criteria in clinical trials, is often defined as Hurley stage II or III disease, at which point irreversible tissue damage has already occurred. In real-world clinical settings, these considerations include treatments tried and failed, predicted disease trajectory, disease characteristics beyond lesion type, impact of disease on patients' functional status and quality of life, and patient comorbidities, venturing away from the limitations of Hurley stage designations. Future clinical trials may benefit from inclusion of recalcitrant Hurley stage I patients, which may then re-shape treatment guidelines and insurance coverage and improve patient access to biologic treatments.

Anogenital Crohn's Disease and Granulomatosis: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metastatic Crohn's disease is an extraintestinal cutaneous manifestation characterised by non-specific inflammatory lesions anatomically separate from the gut; genital involvement is rare. We conducted a systematic review of anogenital Crohn's disease and granulomatosis, to provide a synthesis of epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted via MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database from inception to December 1, 2020. Two investigators extracted and analysed study data. Response and remission were defined as partial improvement or complete resolution of symptoms and examination findings, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 9381 screened studies, 185 articles, [410 cases: 273 female, 137 male] were included. The predominant clinical features were oedema, ulcers, fissures, and hypertrophic lesions. Adults and children present similarly. Luminal Crohn's disease was diagnosed in nearly 80% of cases including 45-80% patients without gastrointestinal symptoms (time to inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] from anogenital Crohn's disease diagnosis [range] -43 to 11 years). Antibiotics, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy were the most frequently prescribed agents. At final follow-up, non-response, response, and remission rates were 37/304 [12%], 267/304 [88%], and 114/304 [38%], respectively. Oedema was associated with a poor response to topical therapy. Greater response rates to anti-TNF therapy were seen in patients prescribed concomitant immunomodulation [24/25, 96% vs 67/90, 74%, p = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

We provide an illustrative summary of the clinical presentation and treatment effectiveness of this rare, under-recognised condition, and a proposed algorithm for approach and management. Prospective studies with longer follow-up are required to define optimal treatment strategies.

Biologics and Small Molecule Inhibitors for Treating Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) vary among different countries, and several biologics and small molecule inhibitors have been tested for treating moderate-to-severe HS over the past few years. However, treatment guidelines for HS vary among different countries.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to exam the efficacy and serious adverse events (SAEs) of biologics and small-molecule inhibitors in treating moderate-to-severe HS. Binary outcomes were presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs with a total of 2076 participants on nine biologics and three small-molecule inhibitors for treating moderate-to-severe HS, including adalimumab, anakinra, apremilast, avacopan, bimekizumab, CJM112, etanercept, guselkumab, IFX-1, INCB054707, infliximab, and MABp1. The meta-analysis revealed only adalimumab (RR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.44-2.17) and bimekizumab (RR 2.25, 95% CI, 1.03-4.92) achieved significant improvement on hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR), and adalimumab was superior to placebo in achieving dermatology life quality index (DLQI) 0/1 (RR 3.97; 95% CI, 1.70-9.28). No increase in SAEs was found for all included active treatments when compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab and bimekizumab are the only two biologics effective in achieving HiSCR with acceptable safety profile, whereas adalimumab is the only biologic effective in achieving DLQI 0/1.

Surgical Treatment in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory disorder of follicular occlusion with pubertal onset that presents as painful inflammatory nodules, sinus tracts, and tunnelling in apocrine-gland-rich areas, such as the axilla, groin, lower back, and buttocks. The disease course is complicated by contractures, keloids, and immobility and is often associated with a low quality of life. It is considered a disorder of follicular occlusion with secondary inflammation, though the exact cause is not known. Management can often be unsatisfactory and challenging due to the chronic nature of the disease and its adverse impact on the quality of life. A multidisciplinary approach is key to prompt optimal disease control. The early stages can be managed with medical treatment, but the advanced stages most likely require surgical intervention. Various surgical options are available, depending upon disease severity and patient preference. In this review an evidence-based outline of surgical options for the treatment of HS are discussed. Case reports, case series, cohort studies, case-control studies, and Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT)s available in medical databases regarding surgical options used in the treatment of HS were considered for the review presented in a narrative manner in this article.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study (THESEUS): protocol for a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful, inflammatory skin disease with estimates of prevalence in the European population of 1%-2%. Despite being a relatively common condition, the evidence base for management of HS is limited. European and North American management guidelines rely on consensus for many aspects of treatment and within the UK variations in management of HS have been identified. The HS James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) published a top 10 list of future HS research priorities including both medical and surgical interventions. The aims of the THESEUS study are to inform the design of future HS randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and to understand how HS treatments are currently used. THESEUS incorporates several HS PSP research priorities, including investigation of oral and surgical treatments. Core outcome domains have been established by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC) and THESEUS is designed to validate instruments to measure the domains.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The THESEUS study is a prospective observational cohort study. Participants, adults with active HS of any severity, will be asked to select one of five HS treatment options that is appropriate for their HS care. Participants will be allocated to their chosen treatment intervention and followed for a period of up to 12 months. Outcomes will be assessed at 3-monthly intervals using HISTORIC core outcome instruments. Video recordings of the surgical and laser operations will provide informational and training videos for future trials. Nested mixed-methods studies will characterise the interventions in clinical practice, understand facilitators and barriers to recruitment into future HS RCTs and examine patients' and clinicians' perspectives on HS treatment choices.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN69985145.