Front-line management of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in adult solid organ recipient patients - A British Society for Haematology Guideline

The IPTA Nashville consensus conference on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation in children: IV-consensus guidelines for the management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in children and adolescents

The International Pediatric Transplant Association convened an expert consensus conference to assess current evidence and develop recommendations for various aspects of care relating to post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) after pediatric solid organ transplantation. This report addresses the outcomes of deliberations by the PTLD Management Working Group. A strong recommendation was made for reduction in immunosuppression as the first step in management. Similarly, strong recommendations were made for the use of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) as was the case for chemotherapy in selected scenarios. In some scenarios, there is uncoupling of the strength of the recommendations from the available evidence in situations where such evidence is lacking but collective clinical experiences drive decision-making. Of note, there are no large, randomized phase III trials of any treatment for PTLD in the pediatric age group. Current gaps and future research priorities are highlighted.

EBV-Related Lymphoproliferative Diseases: A Review in Light of New Classifications

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a prevalent virus that can be detected in the vast majority of the population. Most people are asymptomatic and remain chronically infected throughout their lifetimes. However, in some populations, EBV has been linked to a variety of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs), such as Burkitt lymphoma, classic Hodgkin lymphoma, and other LPDs. T-cell LPDs have been linked to EBV in part of peripheral T-cell lymphomas, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphomas, extranodal nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphomas, and other uncommon histotypes. This article summarizes the current evidence for EBV-associated LPDs in light of the upcoming World Health Organization classification and the 2022 ICC classification.

Successful Treatment of Refractory Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in a Heart Transplant Recipient

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are opportunistic malignancies that complicate the success of hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation. These disorders often arise post-transplant due to the immunosuppression required for minimizing the risk of rejection of donor tissue. First-line treatment of these disorders includes limiting immunosuppression when permissible. Subsequent treatment includes the use of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab), and/or combination chemotherapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment paradigm in many lymphoid malignancies. It is not approved for PTLD due to exclusion of PTLD patients from pivotal clinical trials. Also, its utilization post-transplant can be complex and multidisciplinary care is of utmost importance for successful administration of a potentially curative treatment. We present a 68-year-old patient with history of heart transplant for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, diagnosed with PTLD that was refractory to treatment using current guidelines until successfully receiving CAR T-cell therapy.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders following kidney transplantation: A literature review with updates on risk factors, prognostic indices, screening strategies, treatment and analysis of donor type

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) is a devastating complication of kidney transplantation with an insidious presentation and potential to disseminate aggressively. This review delineates the risk factors, prognostic indexes, screening, current management algorithm and promising treatment strategies for PTLD. Kidneys from both extended criteria donors (ECD) and living donors (LD) are being increasingly used to expand the donor pool. This review also delineates whether PTLD outcomes vary based on these donor sources. While Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a well-known risk factor for PTLD development, the use of T-cell depleting induction agents has been increasingly implicated in aggressive, monomorphic forms of PTLD. Research regarding maintenance therapy is sparse. The international prognostic index seems to be the most validate prognostic tool. Screening for PTLD is controversial, as annual PET-CT is most sensitive but costly, while targeted monitoring of EBV-seronegative patients was more economically feasible, is recommended by the American Society of Transplantation, but is limited to a subset of the population. Other screening strategies such as using Immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor require further validation. A risk-stratified approach is taken in the treatment of PTLD. The first step is the reduction of immunosuppressants, after which rituximab and chemotherapy may be introduced if unsuccessful. Some novel treatments have also shown potential benefit in studies: brentuximab vedotin, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Analysis of LD v DD recipients show no significant difference in incidence and mortality of PTLD but did reveal a shortened time to development of PTLD from transplant. Analysis of SCD vs ECD recipients show a higher incidence of PTLD in the ECD group, which might be attributed to longer time on dialysis for these patients, age, and the pro-inflammatory nature of these organs. However, incidence of PTLD overall is still extremely low. Efforts should be focused on optimising recipients instead. Minimising the use of T-cell depleting therapy while encouraging research on the effect of new immunosuppressants on PTLD, screening for EBV status are essential, while enabling shared decision-making during counselling when choosing kidney donor types and individualised risk tailoring are strongly advocated.

Differentiating Between Epstein-Barr Virus-positive Lymphoid Neoplasm Relapse and Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder After Sex-mismatched Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

After allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), accurate differentiation between donor-derived post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) and relapse of recipient-derived lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) is crucial for determining treatment. Conventional diagnostic approaches for PTLD include histopathological examination, flow cytometry, and chimerism analysis of bulk tumor tissue. However, these methods are inconclusive in cases in which the primary disease is an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive LPD and is of the same lineage as that of the post-HSCT LPD tumor cells. Particularly, in cases where the number of tumor cells in the tissue is low, it is difficult to determine the origin of tumor cells. In this study, we developed a new method to simultaneously detect signals using sex chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunofluorescence staining, and EBV-encoded small RNA in situ hybridization on a single section of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded histopathological specimen. The utility of the method was validated using specimens from 6 cases of EBV-positive LPD after sex-mismatched HSCT that were previously difficult to diagnose, including Hodgkin lymphoma-like PTLD that developed after HSCT for Hodgkin lymphoma and recurrence of chronic active EBV infection. This method successfully preserved the histologic structure after staining and allowed accurate determination of tumor cell origin and lineage at the single-cell level, providing a definitive diagnosis in all cases. This method provides a powerful tool for the diagnosis of LPDs after sex-mismatched HSCT.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in children, adolescents, and young adults

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains a major complication of transplantation. PTLD is a rare entity and very heterogenous making consensus on diagnosis and treatment very challenging. The majority are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) driven, CD20+ B-cell proliferations. PTLD does occur following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but due to the relative short risk period and efficacy of pre-emptive therapy, PTLD following HSCT will not be discussed in this review. This review will focus on the epidemiology, role of EBV, clinical presentation, diagnosis and evaluation and the current and emerging treatment strategies for pediatric PTLD following solid organ transplantation.

HLA-E-restricted immune responses are crucial for the control of EBV infections and the prevention of PTLD

Primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections may cause infectious mononucleosis (IM), whereas EBV reactivations in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients are associated with posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). It is still unclear why only a minority of primary EBV-infected individuals develop IM, and why only some patients progress to EBV+PTLD after transplantation. We now investigated whether nonclassic human leukocyte antigen E (HLA-E)-restricted immune responses have a significant impact on the development of EBV diseases in the individual host. On the basis of a large study cohort of 1404 patients and controls as well as on functional natural killer (NK) and CD8+ T-cell analyses, we could demonstrate that the highly expressed HLA-E∗0103/0103 genotype is protective against IM, due to the induction of potent EBV BZLF1-specific HLA-E-restricted CD8+ T-cell responses, which efficiently prevent the in vitro viral dissemination. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the risk of symptomatic EBV reactivations in immunocompetent individuals as well as in immunocompromised transplant recipients depends on variations in the inhibitory NKG2A/LMP-1/HLA-E axis. We show that EBV strains encoding for the specific LMP-1 peptide variants GGDPHLPTL or GGDPPLPTL, presented by HLA-E, elicit strong inhibitory NKG2A+ NK and CD8+ T-cell responses. The presence of EBV strains encoding for both peptides was highly associated with symptomatic EBV reactivations. The further progression to EBV+PTLD was highly associated with the presence of both peptide-encoding EBV strains and the expression of HLA-E∗0103/0103 in the host. Thus, HLA-E-restricted immune responses and the NKG2A/LMP-1/HLA-E axis are novel predictive markers for EBV+PTLD in transplant recipients and should be considered for future EBV vaccine design.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: Update on treatment and novel therapies

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is rare and heterogeneous lymphoid proliferations that occur as a result of immunosuppression following solid organ transplant (SOT) and haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) with the majority being driven by EBV. Although some histologies are similar to lymphoid neoplasms seen in immunocompetent patients, treatment of PTLD may be different due to difference in pathobiology and higher risk of treatment complications. The most common treatment approach in SOT PTLD after failing immunosuppression reduction (RIS) takes into consideration a risk-stratified sequential algorithm with rituximab +/- chemotherapy based on phase 2 studies. In HSCT PTLD, RIS alone and chemotherapy are usually ineffective making rituximab +/- RIS as the gold standard of frontline treatment. In this review, we give an update on the treatment of PTLD beyond RIS. We highlight the most recent studies that attempted to incorporate more aggressive chemotherapy regimens and novel treatments into the traditional risk-stratified sequential approach. We also discuss the role of EBV-cytotoxic T lymphocytes in treatment of EBV-driven PTLD. Other novel agents with potential role in PTLD will be discussed in addition to the challenges that could arise with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in this population.

Expert Consensus on the Characteristics of Patients with Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (EBV+ PTLD) for Whom Standard-Dose Chemotherapy May be Inappropriate: A Modified Delphi Study

INTRODUCTION

Following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or solid organ transplantation, patients are at risk of developing Epstein-Barr virus-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (EBV⁺ PTLD), which is an ultra-rare and potentially lethal hematologic malignancy. Common treatments for EBV⁺ PTLD include rituximab alone or combined with chemotherapy. Given specific considerations for this population, including severity of the underlying condition requiring transplant, the rigors of the transplant procedure, as well as risks to the transplanted organ, there is a group of patients with EBV⁺ PTLD for whom chemotherapy may be inappropriate; however, there is limited information characterizing these patients. This study aimed to reach expert consensus on the key characteristics of patients for whom chemotherapy may be inappropriate in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus among clinicians with expertise treating EBV⁺ PTLD. Articles identified in a targeted literature review guided the development of round 1 and 2 topics and related statements. The consensus threshold for round 1 statements was 75.0%. If consensus was achieved in round 1, the statement was not discussed further in round 2. The consensus thresholds for round 2 were moderate (62.5-75.0%), strong (87.5%), or complete (100.0%).

RESULTS

The panel was composed of a total of eight clinicians (seven hematologists/hemato-oncologists) from six European countries. The panel generated a final list of 43 consensus recommendations on the following topics: terminology used to describe patients for whom chemotherapy may be inappropriate; demographic characteristics; organ transplant characteristics; comorbidities that preclude the use of chemotherapy; EBV⁺ PTLD characteristics; and factors related to treatment-related mortality and morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified Delphi panel successfully achieved consensus on key topics and statements that characterized patients with EBV⁺ PTLD for whom chemotherapy may be inappropriate. These recommendations will inform clinicians and aid in the treatment of EBV⁺ PTLD.

Diagnosis and management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease following solid organ transplantation in children, adolescents, and young adults

Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD) remains a major complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT) in pediatric patients. The majority are Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) driven CD20⁺ B-cell proliferations responsive to reduction to immunosuppression and anti-CD20 directed immunotherapy. This review focusses on the epidemiology, role of EBV, clinical presentation, current treatment strategies, adoptive immunotherapy and future research in EBV + PTLD in pediatric patients.

New concepts in EBV-associated B, T, and NK cell lymphoproliferative disorders

EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) include conditions of B, T, and NK cell derivation with a wide clinicopathological spectrum ranging from indolent, self-limiting, and localized conditions to highly aggressive lymphomas. Since the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) lymphoma classification, progress has been made in understanding the biology of the EBV-associated LPDs. The diagnostic criteria of EBV+ mucocutaneous ulcer and lymphomatoid granulomatosis have been refined, and a new category of EBV-positive polymorphic B cell LPD was introduced to encompass the full spectrum of EBV-driven B cell disorders. The differential diagnosis of these conditions is challenging. This report will present criteria to assist the pathologist in diagnosis. Within the group of EBV-associated T and NK cell lymphomas, a new provisional entity is recognized, namely, primary nodal EBV+ T or NK cell lymphoma. The EBV + T and NK cell LPDs in children have undergone major revisions. In contrast to the 2016 WHO classification, now four major distinct groups are recognized: hydroa vacciniforme (HV) LPD, severe mosquito bite allergy, chronic active EBV (CAEBV) disease, and systemic EBV-positive T cell lymphoma of childhood. Two forms of HV LPD are recognized: the classic and the systemic forms with different epidemiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis. The subclassification of PTLD, not all of which are EBV-positive, remains unaltered from the 2016 WHO classification. This review article summarizes the conclusions and the recommendations of the Clinical Advisory Committee (CAC), which are summarized in the International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms.

Recent Advances in Adult Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

PTLD is a rare but severe complication of hematopoietic or solid organ transplant recipients, with variable incidence and timing of occurrence depending on different patient-, therapy-, and transplant-related factors. The pathogenesis of PTLD is complex, with most cases of early PLTD having a strong association with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and the iatrogenic, immunosuppression-related decrease in T-cell immune surveillance. Without appropriate T-cell response, EBV-infected B cells persist and proliferate, resulting in malignant transformation. Classification is based on the histologic subtype and ranges from nondestructive hyperplasias to monoclonal aggressive lymphomas, with the most common subtype being diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-like PTLD. Management focuses on prevention of PTLD development, as well as therapy for active disease. Treatment is largely based on the histologic subtype. However, given lack of clinical trials providing evidence-based data on PLTD therapy-related outcomes, there are no specific management guidelines. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis, histologic classification, and risk factors of PTLD. We further focus on common preventive and frontline treatment modalities, as well as describe the application of novel therapies for PLTD and elaborate on potential challenges in therapy.

Modified risk-stratified sequential treatment (subcutaneous rituximab with or without chemotherapy) in B-cell Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after Solid organ transplantation (SOT): the prospective multicentre phase II PTLD-2 trial

The prospective multicentre Phase II PTLD-2 trial (NCT02042391) tested modified risk-stratification in adult SOT recipients with CD20-positive PTLD based on principles established in the PTLD-1 trials: sequential treatment and risk-stratification. After rituximab monotherapy induction, patients in complete remission as well as those in partial remission with IPI < 3 at diagnosis (low-risk) continued with rituximab monotherapy and thus chemotherapy free. Most others (high-risk) received R-CHOP-21. Thoracic SOT recipients who progressed (very-high-risk) received alternating R-CHOP-21 and modified R-DHAOx. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) in the low-risk group. The PTLD-1 trials provided historical controls. Rituximab was applied subcutaneously. Of 60 patients enrolled, 21 were low-risk, 28 high-risk and 9 very-high-risk. Overall response was 45/48 (94%, 95% CI 83–98). 2-year Kaplan–Meier estimates of time to progression and overall survival were 78% (95% CI 65–90) and 68% (95% CI 55–80) – similar to the PTLD-1 trials. Treatment-related mortality was 4/59 (7%, 95% CI 2–17). In the low-risk group, 2-year EFS was 66% (95% CI 45–86) versus 52% in the historical comparator that received CHOP (p = 0.432). 2-year OS in the low-risk group was 100%. Results with R-CHOP-21 in high-risk patients confirmed previous results. Immunochemotherapy intensification in very-high-risk patients was disappointing.

Incidence and outcomes of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after 5365 solid-organ transplants over a 20-year period at two UK transplant centres

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication of solid-organ transplantation (SOT). We present the incidence and outcomes of PTLD in a cohort of 5365 SOT recipients over a 20-year period at two UK transplant centres. With a median follow-up of 7.7 years, 142 of 5365 patients have developed PTLD. Cumulative incidence was 18% at five years after multivisceral transplant and 1%-3% at five years following the other SOT types. Twenty-year cumulative incidence was 2%-3% following liver and heart transplantation and 10% following kidney transplantation. Median overall survival (OS) following SOT was 16 years, which is significantly reduced compared with the age-adjusted UK population. There is relatively high early mortality following diagnosis of PTLD and only patients surviving two years regained a longer-term survival approaching the non-PTLD SOT cohort. Of 90 patients with monomorphic PTLD, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 66 were treated with first-line rituximab monotherapy and 24 received first-line rituximab plus chemotherapy. Up-front rituximab monotherapy does not appear to compromise OS, but the number of patients dying from non-lymphoma causes before and after treatment remains high with both treatment approaches. Multivariate analysis of all 90 monomorphic PTLD patients identified an International Prognostic Index (IPI) of 3+ as the strongest pretreatment variable associating with inferior one-year OS.