Chromogranin A and neurone-specific enolase serum levels as predictors of treatment outcome in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing abiraterone therapy

Perineural Invasion as a Risk Factor For Soft Tissue Progression in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Abiraterone Resistance

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer presents with soft tissue progression (STP) is highly aggressive. We analyzed the risk factor for STP in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who developed abiraterone acetate (AA) resistance.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with mCRPC who received AA between February 2018 and July 2022. STP was defined as recurrent lesions in situ, multiple regional lymph node metastases (mLNM), or visceral metastases. Clinical features of patients with STP were analyzed, and risk factors for STP were further investigated.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (mean age, 75.0 years; median follow-up time, 22.3 months) were included in this study. Twenty-three patients (36.5%) presented STP during follow up, the overall survival (OS) after STP was 4.6 months. The serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) were significantly elevated in patients with STP. Biopsies for 8 patients with STP showed neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC, n = 5) was the major pathological types. Further analysis showed that perineural invasion (PNI) in primary tumor were the independent risk factors (HR = 3.145, P = 0.020) for STP, and PNI was related to the aggressiveness of tumor. Patients with PNI showed shorter castration-resistant progression free survival (median, 23.73 months vs. 25.59 months) and STP progression free survival (median, 19.7 months vs. not reached) compared with patients without PNI.

CONCLUSIONS

STP showed extremely poor prognoses in patients with mCRPC after AA resistance, NEPC is the main pathological type of STP, and PNI in primary tumor was an independent risk factor for STP and indicated poor prognosis of prostate cancer.

Impact of Neuroendocrine Differentiation (NED) on Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Efficacy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A Retrospective Analysis

Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) represents a possible androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) resistance mechanism in metastatic castration resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC). As mCRPC with NED has been excluded from clinical trials evaluating ARPI efficacy, this study investigates the prognostic impact of NED in mCRPC patients treated with ARPIs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 327 mCRPC patient data treated with Enzalutamide or Abiraterone in the first and second or successive lines of treatment. NED was assessed using prostate biopsy samples through immunohistochemical staining. Results: NED was confirmed in 32/327 (9.8%) mCRPC patients. In the overall population, mCRPC with NED showed worse PFS (4.38 vs. 11.48 months HR 2.505 [1.71-3.68] p < 0.05), disease control rate (DCR), and PSA response. In the first line setting, mCRPC with NED demonstrated worse PFS (8.5 vs. 14.9 months HR 2.13 [1.18-3.88], p < 0.05). Similarly, in the second or successive lines, mCRPC with NED showed worse PFS (4.0 vs. 7.5 months HR 2.43 [1.45-4.05] p < 0.05), DCR, PSA response and OS (12.53 vs. 18.03 months HR 1.86 [1.12-3.10] p < 0.05). The adverse impact of NED on PFS was consistence across all subgroups; we also noted a trend of worse PFS in patients with high vs. low NED. Conclusions: In our study, mCRPC with NED treated with Enzalutamide or Abiraterone showed worse clinical outcomes. NED assessment should be considered to optimize treatment decisions in the mCRPC setting.

Small Cell/Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Rare Treatment-Resistant Variant Presenting as Acute Onset Severe Back Pain

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is the most frequent subtype of prostate cancer. Being an androgen-driven disease, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is one of the mainstay treatments for prostatic adenocarcinoma. ADT however can induce androgen resistance and can cause neuroendocrine differentiation of the cells and subsequently can lead to the emergence of neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). NEPC, despite being rare, is very aggressive with a very low survival period. The majority of the NEPC cases are treatment-emergent. There is no definite guideline on screening for the development of NEPC for patients who are on ADT. Our case highlights the lethality and aggressiveness of NEPC and the relationship between ADT and NEPC. More research is needed to compare different imaging techniques for early detection and identification of NEPC and to establish screening protocols for patients at risk of developing NEPC while on ADT.

Neuroendocrine differentiation predicts the therapeutic efficacy of abiraterone and docetaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We aim to explore the predictive value of neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving abiraterone or docetaxel as first-line therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 262 mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone or docetaxel as first-line mCRPC treatment. NED was evaluated using prostate biopsy samples at the time of mCRPC by immunohistochemical staining. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to assess the association between NED and treatment outcomes including PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

NED was confirmed in 100/262 (38.2%) mCRPC patients, with 76/100 (76.0%) and 24/100 (24.0%) men harboring NED < 10% and NED ≥ 10%, respectively. 203/262 (77.5%) and 59/262 (22.5%) patients received abiraterone and docetaxel, respectively. In abiraterone treatment, NED was associated with a significantly shorter median PSA-PFS (mPSA-PFS, 7.5 vs. 10.3-Mo, P < 0.001), median rPFS (mrPFS, 15.9 vs. 19.5-Mo, P = 0.010), and median OS (mOS, 23.2 vs. 34.3-Mo, P = 0.014)). Likewise, for mCRPC patients receiving docetaxel, the positive detection of NED also predicted shorter mPSA-PFS (3.8 vs. 5.9-Mo, P = 0.052), mrPFS (8.4 vs. 20.4-Mo, P = 0.016) and mOS (13.6 vs. 29.0-Mo, P = 0.033). The adverse prognostic trait of NED is consistent in most subgroups. Additionally, patients' survival outcomes deteriorated as the NED proportion grew in both therapies. After propensity score matching, NED-positive patients showed comparable prognosis in abiraterone and docetaxel therapy.

CONCLUSION

For mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone or docetaxel, NED and its proportion were critical predictive factors. NED detection at mCRPC might aid in predicting patients' outcomes and optimizing treatment decisions.

Prognostic Significance of Chromogranin A Expression in the Initial and Second Biopsies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) characterized by the expression of neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A (CgA), is frequently observed in advanced prostate cancer (PCa), the prognostic significance of which is still controversial. Here we specifically addressed the issue of the potential prognostic value of CgA expression in advanced-stage PCa patients with distant metastases and its change over time from metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). CgA expression was assessed immunohistochemically in initial biopsies of mHSPC, as well as in second biopsies of mCRPC in sixty-eight patients, and its correlation with prognosis (together with conventional clinicopathologic parameters) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. We found that CgA expression was an independent adverse prognostic factor for both mHSPC (CgA positivity ≥ 1%, HR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.04-4.26, p = 0.031) and mCRPC (CgA ≥ 10%, HR = 20.19, 95% CI: 3.04-329.9, p = 0.008). CgA positivity generally increased from mHSPC to mCRPC and was a negative prognosticator. The assessment of CgA expression may help with the clinical evaluation of advanced-stage patients with distant metastases.

Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Detection and Prediction

Prostate cancer (PCa) causes deaths worldwide, ranking second after lung cancer. Bone metastasis (BM) frequently results from advanced PCa, affecting approximately 90% of patients, and it also often results in severe skeletal-related events. Traditional diagnostic methods for bone metastases, such as tissue biopsies and imaging, have substantial drawbacks. This article summarizes the significance of biomarkers in PCa accompanied with BM, including (1) bone formation markers like osteopontin (OPN), pro-collagen type I C-terminal pro-peptide (PICP), osteoprotegerin (OPG), pro-collagen type I N-terminal pro-peptide (PINP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and osteocalcin (OC); (2) bone resorption markers, including C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), bone sialoprotein (BSP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP), deoxypyridinoline (D-PYD), pyridoxine (PYD), and C-terminal pyridinoline cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP); (3) prostate-specific antigen (PSA); (4) neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A (CgA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and pro-gastrin releasing peptide (ProGRP); (5) liquid biopsy markers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), microRNA (miRNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and exosomes. In summary, some of these markers are already in widespread clinical use, while others still require further laboratory or clinical studies to validate their value for clinical application.

Dynamic assessment of serum chromogranin A and treatment response with abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

Elevated serum chromogranin A (CGA) is associated with intrinsic or treatment-related neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Fluctuations in serum CGA during treatment of mCRPC have had conflicting results. We analyzed the impact of (i) rising serum CGA and (ii) baseline CGA/PSA ratio during treatment to identify associations with abiraterone acetate (AA) therapy.

METHODS

Between June 2013 and August 2015, 92 men with mCRPC were enrolled in a prospective trial with uniform serum CGA processing performed before initiating abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) and serially after 12 weeks of AA/P treatments. Serum CGA was measured using a homogenous automated immunofluorescent assay. Patients receiving proton pump inhibitors or with abnormal renal function were excluded due to possible false elevations of serum CGA (n = 21 excluded), therefore 71 patients were analyzed. All patients underwent a composite response assessment at 12-weeks. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox Regression models were used to calculate the association with time-to-treatment failure analyses and overall survival.

RESULTS

An increase in chromogranin was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52, p = 0.0181). The median CGA/PSA ratio was 7.8 (2.6-16.0) and an elevated pretreatment CGA/PSA ratio above the median was associated with a lower risk of treatment failure (HR: 0.54 p value = 0.0185). An increase in CGA was not found to be associated with OS (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.42-1.21, p = 0.207). An elevated baseline CGA/PSA ratio was not associated with OS (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.37-1.03, p = 0.062). An increase in PSA after 12 weeks of treatment was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure (HR: 4.14, CI: 2.21-7.73, p = < 0.0001) and worse OS (HR: 2.93, CI: 1.57-4.45, p = < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We show that an increasing chromogranin on AA/P and an elevated baseline CGA/PSA in patients with mCRPC were associated with a favorable response to AA/P with no changes in survival. There may be limited clinical utility in serum CGA testing to evaluate for lethal NED as AA/P did not induce lethal NED in this cohort. This highlights that not all patients with an increasing CGA have a worse OS.

Plasma progastrin-releasing peptide level shows different predictive profiles for treatment response by androgen receptor axis-targeted agents in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The neuroendocrine (NE) pathway cannot be ignored as a mechanism for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) progression. The neuromediator, gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) may be involved in the aberrant activation of the normal androgen receptor (AR) and increased AR variants. This study focused on plasma levels of progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and examined the treatment outcomes with androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents.

METHODS

One hundred patients with metastatic CRPC were enrolled. Enzalutamide (ENZ) or abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) were administered to 50 patients each in a nonrandomized manner as a first-line or later choice. Plasma ProGRP levels were determined using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, and data were collected prospectively. The study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and survival estimates.

RESULTS

In the ENZ series, ProGRP levels correlated with the maximum PSA change from baseline (high ProGRP: -34.5% vs. low ProGRP: -85.7% p = .033). PSA progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic/symptomatic (r/s) PFS, and overall survival (OS) in patients with high ProGRP were significantly worse than those in patients with low ProGRP (median PSA-PFS: 3.3 vs. 10.0 months, p = .001, r/s PFS: 5.0 vs. 15.0 months, p < 0.001, and OS 17.5 vs. 49.0 months, p < .001, respectively). In addition, ProGRP showed an independent predictive value for all survival estimates in multivariate analyses. In the AA/P series, ProGRP levels did not correlate with the PSA change or predict PSA-PFS and r/s PFS, but they maintained a significant difference in OS (19.0 vs. 48.0 months, p = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma ProGRP provides a consistent predictive value for OS in metastatic CRPC patients who underwent therapy with ARAT agents. Meanwhile, ProGRP showed different predictive profiles for PSA- and r/s PFS between ENZ and AA/P. These findings clinically suggest a mechanism for CRPC progression involving the NE pathway via the GRP. The underlying mechanism of different predictive profiles by the ARAT agent should be explored in future research.

Chromogranin A: a useful biomarker in castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The natural history of prostate cancer (PC) almost always evolves to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) status, sometimes comprising pure or mixed neuroendocrine prostate cancers (NEPC) differentiation. In CRPC, monitoring using only prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not optimal since neuroendocrine differentiated cells do not secrete PSA. Thus, monitoring with PSA and chromogranin A (CgA) may be useful. This review aims to evaluate evidence for the usefulness of CgA assessments during the monitoring of prostate cancer.

METHOD

This review was based on three recent meta-analysis concerning CgA and prostate cancer. Further data were obtained from PubMed and Embase databases by searches using keywords, including chromogranin A and prostate cancer.

RESULTS

CgA levels remain largely unchanged during the early PC evolution. The development of NEPC is characterised by lower PSA secretion and increased CgA secretion. Data supporting the prognostic value of high CgA baseline levels for survival are contrasting and scarce. However, increasing CgA levels early during treatment of metastatic (m)CRPC suggests resistance to treatment and predicts shorter survival, particularly in men with high baseline levels of CgA levels. In men with mCRPC, the first-line chemotherapy may be more appropriate than other agents when baseline CgA levels are high. Also, increasing CgA levels during treatment may indicate disease progression and may warrant a change of therapy.

CONCLUSION

CgA monitoring at baseline and regularly during mCRPC management may be useful for monitoring disease evolution. An increased CgA baseline levels and increasing CgA levels may assist physicians with choosing and modifying therapy.

Serum prolactin level as a predictive factor for abiraterone response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To investigate the prognostic value and potential therapeutic target of the baseline serum hormones in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with abiraterone.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in patients with mCRPC receiving abiraterone acetate (AA) from July 2016 to September 2020. Patients who had serum hormone tests within 2 weeks before AA treatment were included. Univariate analysis and Cox regression were performed to evaluate the correlation of sex hormones with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Prolactin (PRL) expression in the clinical specimens was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Bone metastases were quantified by automated Bone Scan Index (aBSI).

RESULTS

The study included 61 patients with a median follow-up of 19.0 months. Patients with lower baseline PRL levels (median) responded better to AA than those with higher baseline PRL levels as indicated by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction (PSA90, 66.7% vs. 25.8%, p = 0.001), PFS (19.6 vs. 7.9 months), and OS (52.8 vs. 19.2 months). Cox regression adjusted for clinical factors also confirmed that baseline PRL level was an independent predictive factor for PFS (hazard ratio = 1.096, p = 0.007). Prostatic PRL expression increased as the disease progressed. PRL expression was also detected in biopsy samples from bone metastasis but not in normal bone tissue, and the serum PRL levels were positively correlated with aBSIs (r = 0.28, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum PRL levels are predictive of response to AA in patients with mCRPC. Serum PRL levels are positively correlated with the volume of metastatic bone disease.

Serum levels of neuron-specific enolase as a prognostic factor for disease progression in patients with GET/NEN in the pancreas and the small intestine

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) concentrations as a prognostic factor in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and to determine the relationship between NSE and clinicopathological features. Serum NSE levels were measured in 179 NEN patients before treatment. It was found that NSE levels in patients with a primary pancreatic location were higher compared to patients with a small intestine lesion (P = 0.015). NSE levels were significantly higher in patients with primary pancreatic location with histological grade G2 compared with the group with low-grade G1 (P = 0.047). Patients with initial liver involvement showed significantly higher NSE levels compared to patients with tumour location in the pancreas (P = 0.009). Statistical analysis confirmed that higher NSE levels were associated with disease progression (P = 0.001) in both the overall study group and in patients with tumours in the pancreas and small intestine. During treatment monitoring, an increase in median NSE concentrations was observed in patients with persistent progression with subsequent blood draws, and a decrease in NSE concentrations was observed in patients with disease stabilisation. We showed that NSE concentrations have prognostic value for progression-free survival in addition to primary liver involvement. In conclusion, the most important results of the study include the demonstration of an association between NSE concentrations and clinical status, which confirms its usefulness in patient monitoring and as a potential predictive indicator for progression-free survival in patients with NENs.

Dynamic plasticity of prostate cancer intermediate cells during androgen receptor-targeted therapy

Treatment-emergent small cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t-SCNC) is associated with an epithelial lineage switch from an androgen receptor (AR)-positive to neuroendocrine (NE)-marker-positive status. Understanding the potential for reversibility of this aggressive disease state has been hampered by the paucity of models suitable for studying rate-limiting, transitional, or intermediate tumor cell subpopulations. We define a dual reporter model that measures acute transcriptional changes in response to castration or AR targeting agents. We identify steady-state transcriptional heterogeneity in AR and NE biomarkers, including intermediate subpopulations that are coordinately high for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and neuron-specific enoclase (NSE) promoter activity. In the presence of castration or AR inhibitors, intermediate cells were necessary and sufficient for therapy-induced conversion of human PC cells to an NSE-high transcriptional status. Using hormone add-back studies, treatment-induced PSA-NSE transcriptional plasticity was reversible in PTEN-deficient PC cells but not in the presence of secondary genetic driver genes, including MYCN.

Down-regulation of ABCB1 by Collateral Sensitivity Drugs Reverses Multidrug Resistance and Up-regulates Enolase I

The emergence of drug resistance remains an obstacle in the clinical treatment of cancer. Recent developments in the studies of drug resistance have identified compounds such as verapamil and tamoxifen that specifically target ABCB1-expressing multidrug resistant (MDR) cells, through an ATP-dependent ROS-generating mechanism. In this report, we demonstrate that treatment of ABCB1-expressing multidrug resistant cells (CHORC5 or MDA-Doxo400) or individual clones of the latter with sub-lethal concentrations of tamoxifen or verapamil down-regulates ABCB1 protein and mRNA expression in surviving clones. Consequently, tamoxifen- and verapamil-treated cells show increased sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs (e.g., colchicine and doxorubicin) and decreased sensitivity to collateral sensitivity drugs (e.g., verapamil and tamoxifen). Importantly, we show for the first time that down-regulation of ABCB1 expression resulting from tamoxifen treatment and CRISPR-knockout of ABCB1 expression up-regulate α-enolase (enolase I) protein levels and activity. These findings demonstrate a possible effect of ABCB1 expression on the metabolic homeostasis of MDR cells. Moreover, given the use of tamoxifen to prevent the recurrence of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, the findings of this study may be clinically important in modulating activity of other drugs.

Serum markers change for intraocular metastasis in renal cell carcinoma

Objective: Renal cell carcinoma is prone to early metastasis. In general, intraocular metastasis (IOM) is not common. In the present study, we studied the relationship between different biochemical indicators and the occurrence of IOM in renal cancer patients, and identified the potential risk factors.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 214 patients with renal cell carcinoma from October 2001 to August 2016 was carried out. The difference and correlation of various indicators between the two groups with or without IOM was analyzed, and binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors of IOM in renal cancer patients. The diagnostic value of each independent related factor was calculated according to the receiver operating curve (ROC).

Results: The level of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in renal cell carcinoma patients with IOM was significantly higher than that in patients without IOM (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in alkaline phosphatase (ALP), hemoglobin (Hb), serum calcium concentration, α fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA-125 etc. between IOM group and non-IOM (NIOM) group (P>0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that NSE was an independent risk factor for IOM in renal cell carcinoma patients (P<0.05). ROC curve shows that the factor has high accuracy in predicting IOM, and the area under the curve (AUC) is 0.774. The cut-off value of NSE was 49.5 U/l, the sensitivity was 72.2% and the specificity was 80.1%.

Conclusion: NSE concentration is a risk factor for IOM in patients with renal cell cancer. If the concentration of NSE in the patient’s body is ≥49.5 U/l, disease monitoring and eye scans should be strengthened.

Use of Chromogranin A for Monitoring Patients With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the role of serum chromogranin A (CgA) in monitoring disease status and treatment response in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs).

METHODS

We included posttherapy pNENs patients with measured serum CgA levels who underwent 68Ga-labeled tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid-peptide positron emission tomography (PET) imaging between April 2017 and January 2020. Serum CgA levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Tumor response was assessed according to the PET response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients with 101 events were included in this study. Serum CgA levels were significantly higher in patients with active disease and metastasis. The optimal cutoff values for CgA for active and metastatic pNENs diagnosis after treatment were 52.39 (77.8% sensitivity, 80.7% specificity) and 60.18 ng/mL (73.9% sensitivity, 73.1% specificity), respectively. Based on 18 patients with serial CgA measurements and PET imaging, the optimal changes in CgA levels for predicting disease remission and progression were a 28.5% decrease (71.4% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity) and a 21.0% increase (100.0% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that serum CgA levels are associated with disease status and treatment response and may thus provide a helpful biomarker for the monitoring and clinical management of patients with pNENs.

Evaluation of Blood-based Biomarkers for Prediction of Response in Carboplatin-treated Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Carboplatin-containing treatment regimens demonstrate moderate efficacy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of carboplatin in relation to blood-based parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for 20 patients with mCRPC who received carboplatin in a single center.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 3.8 months (95%CI=1.5-7.1), median progression-free survival was 1.7 months. We observed two partial remissions (PR, 10%), four stable diseases (SD, 20%) and 14 disease progressions (PD, 70%), resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 30%. A doubling of NSE (neurone specific enolase) values was associated with a 19% absolute higher response rate (95%CI=14-23, p=0.027). All other laboratory parameters failed as predictive markers of response to carboplatin. In univariate Cox regression analysis, only NSE was significantly associated with impaired PFS (HR=0.7, 95%CI=0.56-0.96, p=0.030).

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin showed moderate efficacy against mCRPC in this unselected population of patients and NSE levels may help to predict the success of this treatment.

Undesirable Status of Prostate Cancer Cells after Intensive Inhibition of AR Signaling: Post-AR Era of CRPC Treatment

Recent advances in prostate cancer (PC) research unveiled real androgen receptor (AR) functions in castration-resistant PC (CRPC). Moreover, AR still accelerates PC cell proliferation via the activation of several mechanisms (e.g., mutation, variants, and amplifications in CRPC). New-generation AR signaling-targeted agents, inhibiting extremely the activity of AR, were developed based on these incontrovertible mechanisms of AR-induced CRPC progression. However, long-term administration of AR signaling-targeted agents subsequently induces the major problem that AR (complete)-independent CRPC cells present neither AR nor prostate-specific antigen, including neuroendocrine differentiation as a subtype of AR-independent CRPC. Moreover, there are few treatments effective for AR-independent CRPC with solid evidence. This study focuses on the transformation mechanisms of AR-independent from AR-dependent CRPC cells and potential treatment strategy for AR-independent CRPC and discusses them based on a review of basic and clinical literature.

Mechanisms and markers of resistance to androgen signaling inhibitors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Next-generation androgen signaling inhibitors such as abiraterone and enzalutamide are widely used for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Unfortunately, baseline and acquired resistance to these treatments is commonly observed. In the last few years, significant effort has been devoted to uncover the molecular mechanisms and predictive markers of resistance. These analyses identified various DNA (single nucleotide variations, amplifications) and RNA variants (e.g., the splice variant AR-V7) of androgen receptor in association with resistance to abiraterone and enzalutamide therapies. Additionally, androgen receptor independent resistance mechanisms were also described. Some of these alterations can be detected in tumor tissues and/or in liquid biopsies of prostate cancer patients and therefore may serve as predictive biomarkers. According to the diversity of potential resistance mechanisms, it appears that a combination of markers representing various resistance mechanisms may provide better performance as single markers. In the present review, we summarize the most important androgen receptor dependent and independent resistance mechanisms and pay attention to methodological details. Recent data has highlighted that some of the resistance mechanisms to next-generation antiandrogen agents are associated with a better response to other therapies, we give an overview on currently ongoing clinical studies evaluating this promising aspect.

The prognostic value of serum MMP-7 levels in prostate cancer patients who received docetaxel, abiraterone, or enzalutamide therapy

OBJECTIVES

The rapidly changing treatment landscape in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) calls for biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We recently identified MMP-7 as a potential serum marker for the prediction of response and survival in mCRPC patients who received docetaxel (DOC) chemotherapy. Here, we aimed to test this finding in an independent patient cohort and in addition to explore the prognostic potential of serum MMP-7 in abiraterone (ABI) or enzalutamide (ENZA) treated patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

MMP-7 levels were measured in 836 serum samples from 320 mCRPC patients collected before and during DOC (n = 95), ABI (n = 140), or ENZA (n = 85) treatment by using the ELISA method. Results were correlated with clinical and follow-up data.

RESULTS

MMP-7 baseline levels were similar between the 3 treatment groups. In the ABI and ENZA cohorts, baseline MMP-7 levels were lower in patients with prior radical prostatectomy (P = 0.058 and P = 0.041, respectively). Baseline MMP-7 levels above the median were associated with shorter overall survival for the DOC (P = 0.001) and ENZA (P = 0.006) cohorts. Multivariable analyses in the DOC and ENZA cohorts revealed that high pretreatment MMP-7 level is an independent risk factor for patients' survival. In addition, in DOC-treated patients with high baseline MMP-7 level, marker decrease at the third DOC cycle was associated with improved survival. Patients with high baseline MMP-7 levels had better survival when treated with ABI compared to DOC or ENZA.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the prognostic value of pretreatment MMP-7 serum level and its changes as independent predictors of survival in DOC-treated mCRPC patients. In addition, high MMP-7 was a negative predictor in ENZA-treated but not in ABI-treated patients. These results warrant further research to confirm the predictive value of serum MMP-7 and to explore the potential mechanistic involvement of MMP-7 in DOC and ENZA resistance of mCRPC patients.

Abiraterone vs. docetaxel for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A microsimulation model

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to determine whether androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with abiraterone acetate (AA) or ADT with docetaxel chemotherapy (DC) resulted in improved quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) among men with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and the cost effectiveness of the preferred strategy using decision analytic techniques.

METHODS

A microsimulation model with a lifetime time horizon was constructed. Our primary outcome was QALYs. Secondary outcomes included cost, incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), unadjusted overall survival (OS), rates of second- and third-line therapy, and adverse events. A systematic literature review was used to generate probabilities and utilities to populate the model. The base case was a 65-year-old patient with de novo mCSPC.

RESULTS

A total of 100 000 microsimulations were generated. Initial AA resulted in a gain of 0.45 QALYs compared to DC (3.36 vs. 2.91 QALYs) with an ICER of $276 251.82 per QALY gained with initial AA therapy. Median crude OS was 51 months with AA and 48 months with DC. Overall, 46.6% and 42.6% of patients received second-line therapy and 8.7% and 7.9% patients received third-line therapy in the AA and DC groups, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events were experienced in 17.6% of patients receiving initial AA and 22.3% of patients receiving initial DC.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ADT with AA results in a gain in QALYs and crude OS compared to DC, AA therapy is not a cost-effective treatment strategy to apply uniformly to all patients. The availability of AA as a generic medication may help to close this gap. The ultimate choice should be based on patient and tumor factors.

Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with Neuroendocrine Transformation and BRCA 1 Germ-Line Mutation: A Case Report and Literature Review

A 63-year-old man with a significantly high prostate-specific antigen level was diagnosed via pathology to have advanced prostate adenocarcinoma due to multiple lung metastases. He was then treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) comprising bicalutamide and goserelin. Only after 6 months of stable disease, the cancer progressed and the drug was changed to abiraterone; however, no significant therapeutic effect was observed and the disease was considered as castration-resistant prostate cancer. The histopathologic analysis of the biopsied metastatic lymph node confirmed small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and genetic testing revealed BRCA1 germ-line mutation. The oral PARP inhibitor olaparib was used and achieved a partial tumor response over a period of 2.5 months. Meanwhile, palliative radiotherapy was performed for pain control in the sacrococcygeal region with complete symptom relief. The combination chemotherapy strategy of etoposide and cisplatin was used after the failure of olaparib and achieved pain alleviation in the left leg. The patient received one cycle of this chemotherapy strategy and eventually died of a rapid tumor progression, respiratory failure, and heart failure on April 27, 2019.

An Update on the Prognostic and Predictive Serum Biomarkers in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Serum biomarkers are molecules produced by normal and abnormal cells. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is an example of a serum biomarker used widely in the diagnosis and prognostication of prostate cancer. PSA has its limitations as it is organ- but not cancer-specific. The aim of this review is to summarize the current published data on the potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) that can be used in conjunction with PSA. These biomarkers include microRNAs, androgen receptor variants, bone metabolism, neuroendocrine and metabolite biomarkers, and could guide treatment selection and sequence in an era where we strive to personalized therapy.

Emerging promising biomarkers for treatment decision in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is one of the most common causes of death in males. Even if treatment is often of curative intent in early stages of the disease, up to 50% of patients relapse after primary therapy. Moreover, 10% to 15% of patients present in a primary metastatic stage of disease. In the past years the treatment landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer expanded due to the development of second-generation antiandrogens (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide), chemotherapeutic agents and radium-223. With the availability of several therapeutic lines, we are now confronted with the problem of choosing the most suitable therapy in each state of disease. As often observed in clinical routine, prostate specific antigen is not sufficient for early prediction of a therapy response. Furthermore, biomarkers for prediction of the optimal first-line therapy are badly needed in order to avoid primary resistance. Therefore, the present short review article gives an overview of currently available clinical and preclinical biomarkers for treatment response to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer therapeutic agents with the aim of providing support for a personalized decision-making process in everyday use.

Comprehensive analysis of serum chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase levels in localized and castration-resistant prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess chromogranin A (CGA) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels and changes in these at different stages of prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCA).

METHODS

Overall, 1095 serum samples from 395 patients, divided into three treatment groups, were analysed; the radical prostatectomy (RP) cohort (n = 157) included patients with clinically localized PCA, while the docetaxel (DOC) and the abiraterone (ABI)/enzalutamide (ENZA) cohorts included 95 and 143 patients, respectively, with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. CGA, NSE and total PSA levels were measured using the KRYPTOR method.

RESULTS

Baseline CGA and NSE levels were higher in castration-resistant (DOC and ABI/ENZA cohorts) than in hormone-naïve, clinically localized PCA (P < 0.001). High baseline CGA levels were independently associated with poor overall survival in both the DOC and the ABI/ENZA cohorts, with a stronger association in the ABI/ENZA cohort. In the ABI/ENZA cohort, a > 50% CGA increase at 3 months was associated with poor survival, especially in patients with high baseline CGA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The two- to threefold higher neuroendocrine marker levels in castration-resistant compared to hormone-naïve PCA support the presence of neuroendocrine transdifferentiation under androgen deprivation therapy. Our results showed patients with high baseline CGA levels who experienced a further CGA increase during ABI and ENZA treatment had the poorest prognosis. Serum CGA levels could help in tailoring and monitoring therapy in advanced PCA.

Prognostic role of chromogranin A in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A meta-analysis

We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of chromogranin A (CgA) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for citations published prior to September 2017 that described CgA and CRPC and performed a standard meta-analysis on survival outcomes. Our meta-analysis included eight eligible studies with 686 patients. The results were as follows: progression-free survival (PFS) was associated with CgA level (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-4.14, P = 0.0006); PFS was relative to CgA change (HR = 9.22, 95% CI: 3.03-28.05, P < 0.0001); and overall survival (OS) was relative to CgA level (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.15-1.87, P = 0.002). When we divided the patients into two groups according to therapy status, the result for OS relative to CgA level was an HR of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.09-1.45, P = 0.001) in the first-line hormonal therapy group, and an HR of 2.33 (95% CI: 1.40-3.89, P = 0.001) in the second-line hormonal therapy or chemotherapy group. This meta-analysis indicated that a high CgA level had a negative influence on OS and PFS in CRPC patients. In addition, CRPC patients with a rising CgA had a shorter PFS. Further studies are needed to verify the prognostic value of CgA in CRPC.

Neuroendocrine differentiation markers guide treatment sequence selection in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the value of the serum neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) markers in helping to select the best treatment sequence of abiraterone acetate (AA) and docetaxel-prednisone (DP) in mCRPC.

METHODS

Eighty-eight mCRPC patients were identified (42 in the DP-to-AA group and 46 in the AA-to-DP group). The serum levels of NED markers were measured before the first-line treatment in 88 patients and also before and after DP therapy in 38 patients. We determined their impact on OS, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and PSA-PFS.

RESULTS

In men with an elevation of at least one NED marker (n = 46) before the first-line treatment, those who received AA and then DP had significantly better worse OS (21.7 months [95% CI 21.0-22.4] vs 19.9 months (95% CI 15.3-24.5); P = 0.023. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, treatment sequencing selection (selecting DP-AA rather than AA-DP) independently predicted OS (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, P = 0.035) in patients with an elevation of at least one NED marker. However, in the subgroup without NED marker elevation, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between AA-DP and DP-AA groups (all P > 0.05). In the group with continued NED marker evaluation during DP treatment, patients with higher baseline NED markers and obtaining PSA response to DP were more inclined to experience NED markers decline.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated pretreatment serum NED markers might indicate mCRPC patients would get better clinical outcomes from DP-AA than AA-DP. In contrast, those without NED marker elevation had similar outcomes regardless of which agent was chosen first. mCRPC patients with elevated NED markers and chemotherapy response were more inclined to obtain NED markers decline during DP therapy, which could account for this phenomenon.

Plasma androgen receptor and serum chromogranin A in advanced prostate cancer

Recently, mixed forms between adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) have emerged that are characterized by persistent androgen receptor (AR)-signalling and elevated chromogranin A (CgA) levels. The main aim of this study was to analyze castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide, assessing progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) in association with circulating AR and CgA. AR aberrations were analyzed by droplet digital PCR in pre-treatment plasma samples collected from two biomarker protocols [197 patients from a retrospective study (REC 2192/2013) and 59 from a prospective trial (REC 6798/2015)]. We subdivided patients into three groups according to CgA by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In the primary cohort, plasma AR gain and mutations (p.L702H/p.T878A) were detected in 78 (39.6%) and 16 (8.1%) patients, respectively. We observed a significantly worse PFS/OS in patients with higher-CgA than in patients with normal-CgA, especially those with no AR-aberrations. Multivariable analysis showed AR gain, higher-CgA and LDH levels as independent predictors of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.16, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.50-3.12, p < 0.0001, HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.06-2.84, p = 0.026, and HR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.45-3.13, p = 0.0001, respectively) and OS (HR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.15-2.57, p = 0.008, HR = 3.63, 95% CI 2.13-6.20, p < 0.0001, and HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.54-3.48, p < 0.0001, respectively). These data were confirmed in the secondary cohort. Pre-treatment CgA detection could be useful to identify these mixed tumors and would seem to have a prognostic role, especially in AR-normal patients. This association needs further evaluation in larger prospective cohorts.

Serum chromogranin-A-based prognosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prognostic value of serum chromogranin-A (CGA) in a two-cohort study of men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and to compare with circulating tumor cells (CTCs)-based prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A two-cohort-based evaluation for serum CGA for prognostication in CRPC stage was performed using a screening cohort of 256 men with mCRPC and an independent validation cohort of 92 men with mCRPC. In both cohorts, men receiving proton pump inhibitors and those with non-castrate levels of testosterone (>50 ng/dl) were excluded. Serum CGA was measured in a homogeneous automated immunofluorescent assay using time-resolved amplified cryptate emission. In the validation cohort, CTC enumeration was also performed using the FDA-cleared CELLSEARCH® CTC test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used for prognostic association of serum CGA and CTC counts with overall survival.

RESULTS

In the screening cohort, 200 men were eligible for analysis. The median serum CGA was 100.3 ng/mL (interquartile range: 67-161.3) and 34/200 were above the reference range. In the subset of men with Gleason scores ≥ 8, elevated CGA was associated with shorter overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.19, p = 0.017]. In the validation cohort for 71 men eligible for analysis, the median serum CGA was 90 ng/mL (interquartile range: 55-156) and 31/71 patients had an elevated CGA. 51% of patients had a Gleason score ≥ 8 and 66/71 patients had CTCs enumerated with 26/66 with a CTC count ≥ 5 per 7.5 ml blood sample (unfavorable). Both elevated serum CGA (HR: 1.91, p = 0.043) and unfavorable CTC counts (HR: 2.97, p = 0.0012) were adversely associated with overall survival and patients with ≥ 5 CTCs and elevated serum CGA had the shortest overall survival (HR: 3.76, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Elevated serum CGA was negatively associated with OS in men with mCRPC. Serum CGA represents a prognostic biomarker that may complement CTC enumeration.

The role of serum neuron-specific enolase in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review of the recent literature

In this systematic review, we evaluated the value of serum concentrations of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) in order to clarify the possible role of NSE in the diagnosis, management, treatment and monitoring of PCa. A comprehensive search of the recent literature was conducted to find relevant data on the role of NSE in PCa. Two hundred and eighty-two records were revealed, and 19 articles including 1,772 patients with PCa (either confirmed or suspected) were selected. After reviewing the articles, the major result was that elevated serum NSE appears to correlate with prognosis in advanced PCa, particularly in patients with progressive and metastatic castration-resistant PCa. Based on the existing literature, the role of serum NSE in PCa patients should be further evaluated.

Prognostic value of chromogranin A in patients with GET/NEN in the pancreas and the small intestine

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the chromogranin A (CgA) determination in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the digestive system and to analyse the association between concentration of the marker and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Serum concentrations of CgA were determined before the treatment in 131 patients with NENs, including patients with tumours located in the pancreas, the small intestine, caecum, appendix and in the colon. No significant associations were identified in CgA concentrations between the control group and patients with NENs in appendix and colon. In patients with NENs of the pancreas and NENs of the small intestine and caecum, increased CgA levels were associated with lymph node involvement, distant metastases and a baseline liver involvement. Analyses revealed significantly higher CgA concentrations in patients with active disease compared to those without symptoms of NEN. In patients with NENs of the pancreas, CgA concentration was correlated with tumour grade and Ki67. Significantly higher CgA levels were also found in patients who died compared to those who lived. Analyses of PFS and OS revealed that CgA concentration was not a prognostic factor in patients with NENs of the pancreas. In patients with NENs of the small intestine and caecum, increased CgA concentrations are independent, poor prognostic factors for both PFS and OS. In conclusion, in patients with NENs in pancreas, CgA levels are associated with disease progression, while in patients with NENs in small intestine and caecum, its concentration is a predictive indicator for PFS and OS.

Establishment and characterization of two cabazitaxel-resistant prostate cancer cell lines

Once castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) become resistant for cabazitaxel treatment, the patients are obliged to best supportive care. Therefore, the elucidation of the mechanism of the cabazitaxel-resistance and the conquest are important themes to improve the prognosis of the patients. Then we tried to establish cabazitaxel-resistant CRPC cell lines and characterized them. We established two cabazitaxel-resistant cell lines, PC-3-TxR/CxR and DU145-TxR/CxR from PC-3-TxR and DU145-TxR cell lines previously we established. PC-3-TxR/CxR and DU145-TxR/CxR cells became resistant for cabazitaxel by 11.8-fold and 4.4-fold, respectively. The TxR/CxR cells showed cabazitaxel-resistant using SCID mice in vivo. Although expression of multi-drug resistance gene 1 (MDR1) was up-regulated in DU145-TxR compared with DU145 cells, it was not up-regulated in DU145-TxR/CxR cells any more. In contrast, expression of MDR1 gene was up-regulated in PC-3-TxR compared with PC-3 cells and it was further up-regulated in PC-3-TxR/CxR compared with PC-3-TxR cells. Comparison of cDNA microarray between PC-3-TxR and PC-3-TxR/CxR cells or between DU145-TxR and DU145-TxR/CxR cells revealed that many genes were up-regulated or down-regulated. Finally, knockdown of MDR1 recovered the sensitivity to cabazitaxel not only in PC-3-TxR/CxR cells but also DU145-TxR/CxR cells. Together, regulation of MDR1 gene is important for conquest of the cabazitaxel-resistance.

Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts the combined clinical outcome after sequential therapy with abiraterone and docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antitumor effect of abiraterone (AA) followed by docetaxel-prednisone (DP) or vice versa in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients, and explored factors that might predict combined PSA-PFS, combined rPFS and OS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed mCRPC patients treated with sequential therapy using DP followed by AA or vice versa. Patients who had received enzalutamide or cabazitaxel were excluded. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). The combined PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), combined radiographic PFS (rPFS), and OS of AA-to-DP were compared to the reverse sequence using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank statistics. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors that were associated with combined PSA-PFS, combined rPFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 104 mCRPC patients who began treatment between 2013 and 2017 were identified: 42 were in the DP-to-AA group and 62 were in the AA-to-DP group. There was no significant difference of baseline clinical characteristics between AA-to-DP and DP-to-AA group. In addition, there was no significant difference in combined PSA-PFS (AA-to-DP: 12.5 [11.4-13.6] vs DP-to-AA: 13.2 [10.9-15.5] months [P = 0.127]), combined rPFS (AA-to-DP: 12.2 [10.9-13.4] vs DP-to-AA: 11.2 [8.9-13.5] months [P = 0.183]) and OS (AA-to-DP: 23.3 [19.7-26.9] vs DP-to-AA: 22.9 [22.1-23.7] months [P = 0.213]) between the two treatment sequences in Kaplan-Meier analysis. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, high systematic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) level, which was calculated by P (platelet) × N (neutrophil)/L(lymphocyte), remained significant predictors of OS, combined rPFS and combined PSA-PFS.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we did not observe differences in clinical outcomes based on alternative sequencing of AA and DP in mCRPC patients. The ability to tolerate side effects and patient preference may be used to determine the treatment sequencing. In addition, high pretreatment SII level is a negative independent prognosticator of survival outcomes in mCRPC with sequential therapy using DP followed by AA or vice versa, which might guide clinicians select the best treatment.

Prognostic nutritional index predicts initial response to treatment and prognosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone

OBJECTIVE

To determine if prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and its variation could predict initial response to treatment and prognosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with Abiraterone (AA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One-hundred-twelve chemotherapy pretreated or chemotherapy-naive patients were scheduled for systemic treatment with AA. PNI levels were measured before and after one month of AA treatment. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictive factors of initial response to AA treatment. Univariable and Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors that were associated with PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). The Harrell concordance index with variables only or combined PNI data were used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Eighty-one (72.3%) of 112 patients showed initial response to AA treatment, in which 15 experienced PSA flare during AA treatment. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, high baseline PNI level, PSA level decrease during the first month of AA treatment and PNI level elevation during the first month of AA treatment were significantly correlated with initial response to AA treatment. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, low PNI level remained significant predictors of OS, rPFS and PSA-PFS. The estimated c-index of the multivariate model for OS increased from 0.82 without PNI to 0.83 when PNI added.

CONCLUSION

Independent of PSA level variation, PNI level elevation during the first month of AA treatment and high baseline PNI level were significantly correlated with initial response to AA treatment. In addition, low pretreatment PNI level is a negative independent prognosticator of survival outcomes in mCRPC treated with AA and also increases the accuracy of established prognostic model.

Influence of abiraterone acetate on neuroendocrine differentiation in chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine the influence of abiraterone Acetate (AA) on neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

We conducted an analysis in 115 chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients who would be treated with chemotherapy. The serum levels of chromogranin A (CgA), neurone-specific enolase (NSE) were measured in 67 mCRPC patients without AA treatment and 48 patients after the failure of AA treatment, in which these markers were also measured in 34 patients before and after 6 months of AA treatment. Comparative t-test was used to evaluate the serial changes of serum NED markers during AA treatment and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test the influence of AA treatment on NED.

RESULTS

Serum CgA were NSE were evaluated to be above the upper limit of normal (ULN) in 56 (48.7%) and 29 (25.2%) patients before chemotherapy. In 34 patients with serial evaluation, serum CgA level of 14 patients and NSE of 14 patients increased after the failure of AA treatment. There was no significant difference of NED markers (CgA or NSE variation (P = 0.243) between at baseline and after the failure of AA treatment. Compared with the CgA elevation group in the first 6 months of AA treatment and baseline supranormal CgA group, the CgA decline group, and baseline normal CgA group has a much longer median PSA PFS (14.34 vs 10.00 months, P < 0.001, and 14.23 vs 10.30 months, P = 0.02) and rPFS, respectively (18.33 vs 11.37 months, P < 0.001, and 17.10 vs 12.07 months, P = 0.03). In logistic univariate analysis, AA treatment and its duration were not independent factors influencing NED.

CONCLUSIONS

We hypothesized that AA might not significantly lead to progression of NED of mCRPC in general. Furthermore, we found there was heterogeneity in changes of NED markers in different mCRPC patients during AA treatment. Serial CgA and NSE evaluation might help clinicians guide clinical treatment of mCRPC patients.